This document discusses measuring innovation in the public sector. It outlines several surveys conducted since 2008 to measure innovation among public sector organizations, moving away from comparing the public and private sectors to focus on policy-relevant issues for the public sector. The document also discusses policy interests in public sector innovation and future topics for survey research, such as identifying transformative innovations, measuring beneficial outcomes, and linking innovation capabilities to governance models.
Presentation at the UKIS User Group event held at BEIS on the 20th March 2017. Barriers to innovation.Methods, evidence and
implications for data collection.
Presentation at the UKIS User Group event held at BEIS on the 20th March 2017. Barriers to innovation.Methods, evidence and
implications for data collection.
Existing and well-functioning regional or national innovation systems designed to support scienceand
technology-based innovation have to be further developed in order to be able to meet new
challenges from emerging global markets for technology and new forms of global knowledgesharing.
Across all countries, governments have recently been involved in research and education;
hence a need for new knowledge and new business skills will also have to be in the focus of
governmental interest. Governments have constantly been called upon to react accordingly and to
adopt innovation-friendly framework conditions. New policy tools have been created to be able to
better meet this challenge.
The regional dimension has also become of increasing significance. Nowadays, regions have come
up with own innovation strategies considering the individual regional strengths instead of spreading
public investments thinly across several frontier technology research fields and, as a consequence,
not making much of an impact.
Innovation policy has to acknowledge that traditional boundaries between manufacturing and
services are increasingly being blurred. The success of manufacturing depends, for instance, very
much on innovative services, such as design, marketing and logistics as well as on product related
after-sales services, and vice versa. More and more service providers are manufacturing goods
that build upon or are related to their service portfolio or distribution channels. But regional and
industrial development policies and tools are still not sufficiently taking account of these changes.
Service innovation is in fact a driver for growth and structural change across the entire economy. It
helps to make the entire economy more productive and provides fuel for innovation in other
industries. It even has the potential to create new growth poles and to lead markets that have a
macro-economic impact.
The so called systematic innovation policy approach, which has recently been introduced in many
industrialised countries, is based on the assumption that an effective innovation policy has to
improve all determinants that influence a given sector-specific innovation system.
The indicator-based Analysis of National Innovation Systems Approach (ANIS), developed by the
Institute for Innovation and Technology (iit Berlin) includes a comprehensive examination and
evaluation of the status of national innovation systems. It is mainly intended for emerging and
developing countries for which standard innovation benchmarking and monitoring approaches
might not be sufficient as statistical data is often missing or outdated. Policy-makers of these
countries can benefit from clear advice on how to overcome weaknesses within their national
innovation system and to identify determinants of specific relevance.
ENoLL President Tuija Hirvikoski presented the European Network of Living Lab's vision on global opportunities through Living Labs at Cantillon 2017 event that was hosted in Ireland. Content of the presentation:
- strategy of Living Labs, how Living Labs work, ENoLL memberhsip and the 11th wave
- OI2 (open innovation)
- OpenLivingLab Days 2017
- LLs as Local Open Innovation
Ecosystems
- Living Lab examples (Finland - Laurea UAS)
EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY: POLICY EXPERIMENTATION FOR P...Totti Könnölä
The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation TEKES and the Finnish Innovation Fund SITRA organised in autumn 2016 an international workshop to compile international research data on developing ecosystems. Totti Könnölä, CEO of Insight Foresight Institute, presented the paper “Co-creating Pan-European Innovation Ecosystems: reflections from the EIT”.
Industrial Policy for New Growth Areas and
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
Research workshop in Helsinki 28.-29. November 2016
Convenors: Timo Hämäläinen, Sitra and Antonio
Andreoni, SOAS University of London
Organizers: Sitra, Tekes & MEE
Invited lecture
Libraries Advocating for Open Access: Best Practices and Lessons LearntIryna Kuchma
Best practices and lessons learnt from national and institutional open access (OA) advocacy campaigns in EIFL partner countries to reach out to research communities. Recommendations are based on 11 case studies showcasing successful national and institutional campaigns in Eastern Europe and Africa (in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, Ukraine, Botswana, Ghana, Malawi, Sudan and Zimbabwe). The campaigns resulted in increased understanding and awareness about OA. Most transferable elements that made the projects succeed (strategies, tactics and tools) are described.
Societal Impact
Nicolas Robinson Garcia, INGENIO (UPV-CSIC), Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain / Daniel Torres-Salinas, Universidad de Navarra and Universidad de Granada (EC3metrics & Medialab UGR), Spain
Recently there is an increasing pressure on the development of indicators and methodologies that can offer evidences of the societal impact of researchers’ activity. This presentation will offer a comprehensive overview on the definition of societal impact, types of impact, and the attribution problem when searching for potential indicators. A special attention will be given to altmetric indicators and their potential role in tracing social engagement and its relation with societal impact. Examples of potential uses and current lines of work will be presented.
***************************
Scientometric procedures are increasingly used to analyse developments and trends in science and technology. Decisions to be taken often have severe implications. Consequently data handling, indicator construction and interpretation require competent expert knowledge, which is currently only available to a limited extent for all stakeholders in Central Europe not the least due to lacking training opportunities. Responding to the lack of a pertinent scientometrics education (especially in German speaking countries) and to the increasing demand (particularly of research quality managers), the University of Vienna (A), the German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies - DZHW (D) and the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (B) joined cooperatively to found the European Summer School for Scientometrics (esss) in 2010.
Dr Katrien Maes, Chief Policy Officer with the League of European Research Un...IrishHumanitiesAlliance
From the IHA Impact in the Humanities event 8 June held in QUB and co-sponsored by InterTradeIreland.
Panel Two: Impact in Horizon 2020 and the EU
How is Impact conceptualised and captured at the EU level, in programmes such as Horizon 2020, and how does this affect academics, research officers and policy makers at the national level?
OECD bibliometric indicators: Selected highlights, April 2024innovationoecd
This document summarizes bibliometric indicators from the OECD based on data from Elsevier's Scopus database. It shows trends in scientific publication output, citation rates, collaboration, and mobility for countries and regions from 2011-2022. It also includes perspectives on artificial intelligence research and research related to long term challenges like environmental science and energy. The data can be explored further using the OECD's STI.Scoreboard platform (https://oe.cd/sti-scoreboard) and OECD Data Explorer (https://data-explorer.oecd.org) bibliometric datasets.
Presentation of the OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023innovationoecd
OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023: Enabling Transitions in Times of Disruption.
Find out more and access the publication at https://www.oecd.org/sti/science-technology-innovation-outlook/
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Countries across the OECD have developed ambitious plans for STI policy to contribute to socio-technical transitions as the world recovers from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. These plans contain a broad variety of policy goals and instruments designed to support STI in a changing global environment, to tackle new and growing challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and to apply new tools and approaches to STI policy making, especially digital tools, that emerged in the context of the pandemic.
Analysis of scientific publishing activity: Key findings, December 2021innovationoecd
OECD bibliometric data has been updated and now includes preliminary data for 2020. The indicators are based on Scopus Custom Data, Elsevier, Version 5.2021.
Find out more about OECD work on scientometrics and bibliometrics at https://oe.cd/scientometrics
Recommandation du Conseil de l'OCDE sur l'amélioration de l'accès aux données...innovationoecd
Optimiser les bénéfices intersectoriels et transfrontières de l'accès aux données et de leur partage, tout en protégeant les droits des parties prenantes
Recommandation adoptée en octobre 2021. En savoir plus : https://oe.cd/easd21fr
OECD Council Recommendation on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Datainnovationoecd
Maximising the cross-sectoral and cross-border benefits of data access and sharing while protecting the rights of stakeholders
Recommendation adopted in October 2021. Find our more at https://oe.cd/easd21
2020.01.12 OECD STI Outlook launch - Impacts of COVID-19: How STI systems res...innovationoecd
On January 12, join OECD iLibrary, the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation, and ACRL/Choice for a presentation of the key findings from the new STI Outlook, followed by a conversation with OECD STI Director Andrew Wyckoff and RAND Corporation Senior Policy Researcher Marjory Blumenthal about the implications for research and innovation in the US.
Read more at https://oe.cd/STIO21-EES
Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity November 2019 event photo bookinnovationoecd
Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity: Encouraging Digital Security Innovation, London, 14-15 November 2019. Programme and event information available at oe.cd/gfdsp
Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity December 2018 event photo bookinnovationoecd
These photos were taken at the first meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Digital Security for Prosperity, held on 13-14 December 2018 in Paris, France. The Global Forum brings together experts and policy makers to foster regular sharing of experiences and good practice on digital security risk and its management, as well as mutual learning and convergence of views on digital security for economic and social prosperity. It is an international multilateral and multidisciplinary setting for all stakeholder communities. Global Forum website: oe.cd/gfdsp
#GFDSP
Participants at the December 2018 event examined the roles and responsibilities of actors for digital security and cybersecurity, with a focus on good practice for the governance of digital security risk in organisations, and improving digital security of technologies throughout their lifecycle.
The event included speakers from:
- Cybersecurity agencies of France (ANSSI), Germany (BSI), Israel (INCD), United States (DHS CISA), Malaysia, European Union (ENISA)
- Ministries from Brazil (Foreign Affairs), France (Foreign Affairs), Germany (Foreign Affairs), Japan (Min. of Economy, Trade and Industry - METI, Min. of Internal Affairs and Communication - MIC), Mexico (Instituto Federal de
Telecomunicaciones), Netherlands (Economic Affairs and Climate Policy), Norway (Min. of Local Government and Modernisation), United Kingdom (Dept. of Culture, Media, and Sports - DCMS), United States (Dept. of Commerce, Dept. of Homeland Security - DHS)
- Business: A.P. Møller – Maersk, Airbus, Deutsche Telekom, Intel, Microsoft, TÜV SÜD, YesWeHack.
- Civil society, Academia, Technical community (incl. CERT Brazil)
- Other organisations: Federation of European Risk Management Associations (FERMA), Digital Infrastructure Netherlands Foundation (DINL), FS-ISAC, Internet Society ISOC & Online Trust Alliance OTA, BEUC, CEPS, BIAC, CSISAC, ITAC
Other key speakers included:
- Angel Gurría, Secretary-General, OECD
- Guillaume Poupard, Director General, Agence Nationale de la Sécurité des Systèmes d'Information, ANSSI, France
- Pascal Andrei, Chief Security Officer, Airbus
- Arne Schönbohm, President, Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Germany
- Bruce Schneier, Author
- Marietje Schaake, Member of European Parliament
- Henri Verdier, Ambassador for Digital Affairs, France
- Ambassador Thomas Fitschen, Special Representative for Cyber Foreign Policy and
Cybersecurity, Germany
- Matthew Travis, Deputy Director, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), United States
- Carlos da Fonseca, Head of the Information Society Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Brazil
The Oslo Manual is the international reference guide for collecting and using data on innovation. In this new 4th edition, published in October 2018, the manual has been updated to take into account a broader range of innovation-related phenomena as well as the experience gained from recent rounds of innovation surveys in OECD countries and partner economies and organisations.
OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017: Setting the foundations for the digital tr...innovationoecd
The Digital Economy Outlook 2017 shows how Internet infrastructure and usage varies across countries and firms in the OECD area. It looks at policy implications of the digital transformation as well as a wide array of trends. Report available at http://oe.cd/deo2017 - See also the OECD Going Digital project: www.oecd.org/going-digital
OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017: Presentation at Global Parliamentary Netwo...innovationoecd
The Digital Economy Outlook 2017 shows how Internet infrastructure and usage varies across countries and firms in the OECD area. It looks at policy implications of the digital transformation as well as a wide array of trends. Report available at http://oe.cd/deo2017
Presentation for the OECD Telecommunication and Broadcasting Review of Mexico...innovationoecd
4 years after Mexico overhauled its telecommunication and broadcasting sectors with a major legal and regulatory reform, a new OECD Review assesses the impact on communication markets, businesses and households. It recommends further measures for the telecommunication and broadcasting sectors to build on this progress and ensure Mexico reaps maximum benefits from the digital transformation. Gabriela Ramos, the OECD Chief of Staff, G20 Sherpa and Special Advisor to the Secretary-General, presented the OECD Telecommunication and Broadcasting Review of México 2017 along with Andrew Wyckoff, Director of Science, Technology and Innovation, OECD, Communications and Transport Minister Gerardo Ruiz Esparza and Federal Telecommunications Institute President Commissioner Gabriel Oswaldo Contreras Saldívar on 31 August 2017 at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Mexico City.
As Europe's leading economic powerhouse and the fourth-largest hashtag#economy globally, Germany stands at the forefront of innovation and industrial might. Renowned for its precision engineering and high-tech sectors, Germany's economic structure is heavily supported by a robust service industry, accounting for approximately 68% of its GDP. This economic clout and strategic geopolitical stance position Germany as a focal point in the global cyber threat landscape.
In the face of escalating global tensions, particularly those emanating from geopolitical disputes with nations like hashtag#Russia and hashtag#China, hashtag#Germany has witnessed a significant uptick in targeted cyber operations. Our analysis indicates a marked increase in hashtag#cyberattack sophistication aimed at critical infrastructure and key industrial sectors. These attacks range from ransomware campaigns to hashtag#AdvancedPersistentThreats (hashtag#APTs), threatening national security and business integrity.
🔑 Key findings include:
🔍 Increased frequency and complexity of cyber threats.
🔍 Escalation of state-sponsored and criminally motivated cyber operations.
🔍 Active dark web exchanges of malicious tools and tactics.
Our comprehensive report delves into these challenges, using a blend of open-source and proprietary data collection techniques. By monitoring activity on critical networks and analyzing attack patterns, our team provides a detailed overview of the threats facing German entities.
This report aims to equip stakeholders across public and private sectors with the knowledge to enhance their defensive strategies, reduce exposure to cyber risks, and reinforce Germany's resilience against cyber threats.
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
1. Measuring innovation in the public sector
Anthony Arundel Australian Innovation Research Centre, University of Tasmania
and UNU-MERIT, University of Maastricht
Carter Bloch Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy (CFA),
Aarhus University
Barry Ferguson Australian Innovation Research Centre, University of Tasmania
OECD Blue Sky III
Ghent, Belgium
September 19-21, 2016, Ghent
3. 31 MAY 2016
AARHUS
UNIVERSITYAU
Pre 2010:
1.Object-based studies
2.‘business practices’ studies
3.Surveys of municipalities with some questions on innovation
4.UK audit commission survey of innovation in UK local
agencies
2008 – 2009 MEPIN
survey in Scandinavia
first large-scale
dedicated innovation
survey, approx 2,500
responses from CEOs
2010 Innobarometer
survey of all EU
member states,
3,700 responses
from CEOs
2011 SOS survey in
Australia, innovation
module, 6,000
responses from all job
levels
2012 APSII pilot
survey in Australia,
344 responses from
senior managers
2015/16 survey of
Australian/NZ universities,
573 responses from senior
managers
4. 31 MAY 2016
AARHUS
UNIVERSITYAU
Since MEPIN - General trend over time away from
the Oslo Manual guidelines, except for similarities in
questions on innovation types and sections
(information sources, collaboration, obstacles etc.)
Why? Shift from public-private comparison to
policy focus on public sector
Surveys need to address policy-relevant issues
for the public sector
MEPIN (2008/09) – Initial focus on comparison of
innovation in public and private sector
5. 31 MAY 2016
AARHUS
UNIVERSITYAU
POLICY INTERESTS
How innovation occurs – what encourages
innovation and good outcomes?
Use of design-thinking (co-creation), other strategies to
support innovation development
Is there an inclusive innovation culture and if yes, how does
this influence innovation activities and outcomes?
Is innovation mostly ‘bottom-up’ or ‘top-down’ and which
one of these two approaches works best?
Is there a systemic innovation strategy, and if not, how to
build one?
6. 31 MAY 2016
AARHUS
UNIVERSITYAU
POLICY INTERESTS…
How does diffusion and the up-take of good practice
occur?
Can we identify incremental and transformative
innovations?
What are the obstacles?
Effect of a risk-averse culture – what tools can managers
use to work around this, or must managers embrace risk?
Innovating in response to a crisis or funding cuts?
Lack of incentives, staff resistance, resources
7. 31 MAY 2016
AARHUS
UNIVERSITYAU
FUTURE TOPICS FOR SURVEY RESEARCH ON
PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION
How to identify transformative (disruptive)
innovation?
Can we get better measures of innovation outcomes
(particularly beneficial ones)
Can we identify innovations that span organisations?
Includes a systemic innovation strategy
Can we link innovation capabilities to governance
models?
We need more research on risk aversion and on the
diffusion of best practice innovations