13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•233 views
The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential inaccuracies or biases that can exist in blogs, wikis, and other open content due to a lack of oversight or verification of author qualifications.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![The World Wide Web ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Is my source credible?
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources for research. It defines a credible source as one that can be trusted, is agreed upon by other sources, is up-to-date, comes from a respected author or organization, provides clear information about the author/organization, and is not biased. It notes that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone so its accuracy cannot be guaranteed, while .edu, .org, and .gov websites tend to be more credible. It provides tips for evaluating sources like checking copyright dates, references, and professionalism of the website.
Information literacy
Information literacy is a set of skills that allow people to recognize when information is needed and to locate, evaluate, and effectively use that information. These skills are important for students to develop so they can validate information from the internet. The document provides tips for evaluating websites, such as checking the domain name and extension, looking at authorship and links, and examining the content. It directs readers to additional resources on information literacy.
Reliable resources powerpoint
This document discusses reliable and unreliable sources for research. Reliable sources include books, peer-reviewed journals and articles, dissertations, and websites ending in .edu or .gov as these are often from educational institutions or government agencies. Unreliable sources like Wikipedia can be used as a starting point but require confirmation from reliable sources, as the information may not be thoroughly vetted. Blogs, personal websites, and commercial websites with agendas are also generally unreliable. The document provides guidelines for evaluating source reliability based on author credentials, evidence used, and potential biases.
Source Credibility
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources. It provides signs that a source is or isn't credible, including if it is written by an expert, peer-reviewed, published by a reputable organization, has transparency around authorship and purpose, and isn't outdated. It also examines domains like .edu, .gov and .org to provide clues about the publisher and discusses evaluating Wikipedia articles for credibility based on editing policies and quality indicators. The overall message is to carefully examine sources using these criteria before relying on the information.
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part I
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part IOffice of Instructional Development at Dawson College
This document provides an overview of applying new technologies in education with a hands-on approach. It discusses key concepts related to the internet, World Wide Web 1.0 and 2.0, evaluating online resources, using tools like Google Maps, and sharing information through services such as Google Docs, Flickr, YouTube, and Dropbox. The document is intended to be covered over two sessions on January 14th and February 4th that will allow participants to gain experience using these technologies in a classroom setting.Amarillo College Creery TLC Library Instruction PowerPoint Fall 2015
This PowerPoint was created for the Fall 2015 TLC Class taught by Luci Creery. Creator: Jana Comerford, Amarillo College Library
Searchthewebtutorial2014
This document provides tips for evaluating information found on the web. It discusses that the quality of websites varies greatly as the web is uncontrolled. It suggests evaluating websites based on factors like author credentials, date of publication, potential biases, accuracy and purpose. Recommended sources include subject directories, search engines like Google which can be refined, and .gov, .edu sites which are usually reliable. The document stresses the importance of fact checking online information against books and articles verified by experts.
Finding credible sources
The document discusses finding credible sources for research. It emphasizes that using multiple perspectives from a variety of reliable sources helps develop a well-rounded argument. Primary sources are original works, while secondary sources analyze or discuss primary sources. The document cautions against solely using Google, Wikipedia, or top search results, as these may not always be trustworthy. It provides tips for evaluating websites like checking the author's credentials, date of publication, and presence of biases. Databases through the school are presented as a better option than open web searches, as they only contain vetted, credible sources.
Recommended
Is my source credible?
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources for research. It defines a credible source as one that can be trusted, is agreed upon by other sources, is up-to-date, comes from a respected author or organization, provides clear information about the author/organization, and is not biased. It notes that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone so its accuracy cannot be guaranteed, while .edu, .org, and .gov websites tend to be more credible. It provides tips for evaluating sources like checking copyright dates, references, and professionalism of the website.
Information literacy
Information literacy is a set of skills that allow people to recognize when information is needed and to locate, evaluate, and effectively use that information. These skills are important for students to develop so they can validate information from the internet. The document provides tips for evaluating websites, such as checking the domain name and extension, looking at authorship and links, and examining the content. It directs readers to additional resources on information literacy.
Reliable resources powerpoint
This document discusses reliable and unreliable sources for research. Reliable sources include books, peer-reviewed journals and articles, dissertations, and websites ending in .edu or .gov as these are often from educational institutions or government agencies. Unreliable sources like Wikipedia can be used as a starting point but require confirmation from reliable sources, as the information may not be thoroughly vetted. Blogs, personal websites, and commercial websites with agendas are also generally unreliable. The document provides guidelines for evaluating source reliability based on author credentials, evidence used, and potential biases.
Source Credibility
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources. It provides signs that a source is or isn't credible, including if it is written by an expert, peer-reviewed, published by a reputable organization, has transparency around authorship and purpose, and isn't outdated. It also examines domains like .edu, .gov and .org to provide clues about the publisher and discusses evaluating Wikipedia articles for credibility based on editing policies and quality indicators. The overall message is to carefully examine sources using these criteria before relying on the information.
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part I
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part IOffice of Instructional Development at Dawson College
This document provides an overview of applying new technologies in education with a hands-on approach. It discusses key concepts related to the internet, World Wide Web 1.0 and 2.0, evaluating online resources, using tools like Google Maps, and sharing information through services such as Google Docs, Flickr, YouTube, and Dropbox. The document is intended to be covered over two sessions on January 14th and February 4th that will allow participants to gain experience using these technologies in a classroom setting.Amarillo College Creery TLC Library Instruction PowerPoint Fall 2015
This PowerPoint was created for the Fall 2015 TLC Class taught by Luci Creery. Creator: Jana Comerford, Amarillo College Library
Searchthewebtutorial2014
This document provides tips for evaluating information found on the web. It discusses that the quality of websites varies greatly as the web is uncontrolled. It suggests evaluating websites based on factors like author credentials, date of publication, potential biases, accuracy and purpose. Recommended sources include subject directories, search engines like Google which can be refined, and .gov, .edu sites which are usually reliable. The document stresses the importance of fact checking online information against books and articles verified by experts.
Finding credible sources
The document discusses finding credible sources for research. It emphasizes that using multiple perspectives from a variety of reliable sources helps develop a well-rounded argument. Primary sources are original works, while secondary sources analyze or discuss primary sources. The document cautions against solely using Google, Wikipedia, or top search results, as these may not always be trustworthy. It provides tips for evaluating websites like checking the author's credentials, date of publication, and presence of biases. Databases through the school are presented as a better option than open web searches, as they only contain vetted, credible sources.
FSU SLIS InfoSvcs Wk 3 - Web Search & Evaluation
The document discusses evaluating online sources and provides examples of search techniques using Google and Bing to find information on topics like Martin Luther King Jr. and conversions between measurements. It also covers evaluating the credibility of websites and using subject specific search engines or limiting searches to particular domains or file types.
Assessing websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, clues are provided on aspects to examine, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, determining when the information was published, and understanding the intended audience and purpose of the content. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and relevance for research.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Additional tips include checking URLs for clues about the domain, considering print and subscription sources, and evaluating blogs based on the author, content, comments, updates, and biases addressed. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than settling for those that are "good enough" and to keep in mind that source quality affects the evaluation of their own work.
Evaluating Websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for classroom use. It introduces the CRAAP test for critical evaluation, which considers currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. It discusses evaluating domains like .com, .org, and .edu. It also gives examples of determining a website's authority and accuracy through examining the author's credentials, publisher, citations, and more. The goal is to help teachers develop students' skills in critically analyzing online information sources.
Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research
This document discusses criteria for evaluating the trustworthiness and reliability of information found on websites:
Credibility refers to the qualifications and trustworthiness of the source of the information. Accuracy means the information is consistent with other reliable sources and not obviously false. Bias/objectivity examines whether all viewpoints are represented or if the purpose is to entertain, persuade, or inform. Timeliness considers how recently the information was published and whether outdated information would impact its usefulness. Relevance evaluates whether the information is appropriate for the intended audience and topic.
Finding Credible Web Sources
The document provides tips for finding credible web resources. It recommends using academic databases that contain peer-reviewed articles, as these have been examined by experts before publication. It distinguishes between primary and secondary sources, noting primary sources are original documents while secondary sources analyze or respond to primary sources. The document also notes that the domain name (e.g. .edu, .gov) can indicate the credibility of a website and that readers should be aware of potential biases.
Informationliteracy
The document provides information on evaluating the credibility of internet resources. It discusses several key factors to consider, including authority, currency, objectivity, accuracy, and appearance. Authority refers to the qualifications of the author or organization. Currency addresses how recently the content was updated. Objectivity means presenting multiple viewpoints without bias. Accuracy means the information can be verified elsewhere. Appearance considers design elements like ads, navigation, and accessibility. Examples are given of both reputable and questionable websites based on an analysis of these factors.
Credibility
This document discusses credibility and provides tips for finding credible information online. It defines credibility as having accuracy, coverage, objectivity, and an authoritative source. The document recommends two credible databases for biographical information, Biography.com from the Biography Channel and the Academy of Achievement. It notes that databases are trustworthy, organized, time-saving, and full of information. It also provides login credentials for the ABC Clio and Britannica Online databases.
Website Validity
This document discusses S.P.I.D.E.R., a method for evaluating the validity and reliability of websites. S.P.I.D.E.R. stands for Source, Purpose, Information, Domain, Educational value, and Reliability. It provides guidelines for analyzing the source and author of a website, the purpose and potential biases, the relevance and currency of information, implications of the domain extension, depth and quality of content, and whether the same information can be found on other reliable sites. The document also warns that search engine rankings do not guarantee a site's validity and that Wikipedia should be used cautiously as a source for school projects.
Searching the Internet
This document provides guidance for students on effectively searching the internet. It discusses preparing searches by making lists of relevant terms and excluding unwanted terms. Boolean operators like AND, OR, and NOT can be used to combine search terms. Students are advised to evaluate websites for accuracy, authority, and currency before using the information. Proper citation of internet sources is also covered, including examples of in-text citations and works cited entries. Overall, the document emphasizes the importance of planning searches in order to find high-quality information efficiently.
Research power point for students
This document provides guidance on effective internet searching strategies. It discusses defining your search topic, identifying appropriate search locations, developing effective search queries, and evaluating the credibility of sources. Key recommendations include planning your search offline first by identifying questions and keywords. When searching, consider specialized databases and directories instead of only major search engines. Techniques for evaluating sources include examining the URL, domain, author credentials, and date of publication. Sources should be cross-referenced from different credible locations.
Website Evaluation Presentation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and quality in order to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite for school assignments. It recommends using the Five W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - as a framework to analyze the author's credentials, purpose of site, date of publication, domain type, and sources cited. Students are reminded to consider more than one website and also use print resources, as the quality of sources impacts teachers' evaluation of student work. Being a careful evaluator is important for making informed decisions.
Website Evaluation
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, questions are provided to help assess different aspects, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, understanding biases present, and verifying facts through other sources. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and credibility for research.
Online Searching Tips
This document summarizes online searching tips presented by Mindy McAdams from the University of Florida. It discusses advanced search options on Google, evaluating the trustworthiness of websites, investigating website sources, top-level domains, open directories, the Wayback Machine, health information resources, blog searching, and using critical thinking to evaluate online information.
Evaluating websites edit
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for research purposes. It discusses looking at the credibility and authority of the author, accuracy and reliability of the information, date of publication, and sources cited. Some factors to consider include the purpose of the site, biases, and what the URL reveals about the domain and organization responsible for the site. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than just accepting sources at face value.
Wiki credibility
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of Wikipedia articles. It provides the CARS method for evaluation, which stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. Credibility can be evaluated by looking at whether articles have citations and were recently edited. Accuracy is suggested by recent edits and flags for articles needing improvement. Reasonableness is questioned if articles are flagged as biased. Support is indicated by other articles linking to it and viewing edit histories. Protected pages that require special permission to edit are also likely more credible.
Cruz s professional ethics student lesson powerpoint
This document outlines a lesson plan for teaching digital literacy and responsibility to students. It covers topics such as plagiarism, citations, copyright, privacy, and challenges to library materials. The teacher provides definitions and examples of these concepts, as well as lists online resources for students to reference. The goal is for students to properly utilize information from other sources in their schoolwork.
13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential deception from websites, blogs, and wikis and emphasizes the need to approach online information with care and scrutiny.
11 2 t4_chapter11powerpoint
The document discusses the power and importance of language. It explains that language can be used to describe, define concepts, and shape cultural norms. Descriptions, definitions, and acceptable language can vary based on context and culture. Language can also be used to mislead through ambiguity, loaded words, propaganda, and hate speech. However, language also has the power to transform society for good when used to inspire, uplift, and call people to action for positive change.
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
The document discusses different types of logical relationships between categorical propositions:
1) Contraries are propositions that cannot both be true but could both be false, with one being necessarily false if the other is true.
2) Subcontraries are propositions that cannot both be false but could both be true, with one being necessarily true if the other is false.
3) Contradictories are propositions that cannot both be true or both be false.
It also discusses inferences that can be drawn between categorical propositions, including subalternation, obversion, conversion, and contraposition.
Prayer for Poverty, Chastity and Obedience
The document contains three prayers requesting different gifts from God. The first prayer asks for the gift of poverty and to reveal any excessive attachments that prevent a complete "Yes" to God. It asks to learn to rely on God's presence rather than material comforts. The second prayer asks for the gift of chastity and purity to strengthen the body, spirit and soul. The third prayer requests the gift of obedience to listen to God's will and live in obedience through contemplation and service.
Preachers of Grace, Witnesses to the Resurrection
A presentation on Mary Catherine Hilkert, OP's article
A course requirement on the Spirituality of the Preacher (2nd semester 2012-13)
More Related Content
What's hot
FSU SLIS InfoSvcs Wk 3 - Web Search & Evaluation
The document discusses evaluating online sources and provides examples of search techniques using Google and Bing to find information on topics like Martin Luther King Jr. and conversions between measurements. It also covers evaluating the credibility of websites and using subject specific search engines or limiting searches to particular domains or file types.
Assessing websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, clues are provided on aspects to examine, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, determining when the information was published, and understanding the intended audience and purpose of the content. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and relevance for research.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Additional tips include checking URLs for clues about the domain, considering print and subscription sources, and evaluating blogs based on the author, content, comments, updates, and biases addressed. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than settling for those that are "good enough" and to keep in mind that source quality affects the evaluation of their own work.
Evaluating Websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for classroom use. It introduces the CRAAP test for critical evaluation, which considers currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. It discusses evaluating domains like .com, .org, and .edu. It also gives examples of determining a website's authority and accuracy through examining the author's credentials, publisher, citations, and more. The goal is to help teachers develop students' skills in critically analyzing online information sources.
Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research
This document discusses criteria for evaluating the trustworthiness and reliability of information found on websites:
Credibility refers to the qualifications and trustworthiness of the source of the information. Accuracy means the information is consistent with other reliable sources and not obviously false. Bias/objectivity examines whether all viewpoints are represented or if the purpose is to entertain, persuade, or inform. Timeliness considers how recently the information was published and whether outdated information would impact its usefulness. Relevance evaluates whether the information is appropriate for the intended audience and topic.
Finding Credible Web Sources
The document provides tips for finding credible web resources. It recommends using academic databases that contain peer-reviewed articles, as these have been examined by experts before publication. It distinguishes between primary and secondary sources, noting primary sources are original documents while secondary sources analyze or respond to primary sources. The document also notes that the domain name (e.g. .edu, .gov) can indicate the credibility of a website and that readers should be aware of potential biases.
Informationliteracy
The document provides information on evaluating the credibility of internet resources. It discusses several key factors to consider, including authority, currency, objectivity, accuracy, and appearance. Authority refers to the qualifications of the author or organization. Currency addresses how recently the content was updated. Objectivity means presenting multiple viewpoints without bias. Accuracy means the information can be verified elsewhere. Appearance considers design elements like ads, navigation, and accessibility. Examples are given of both reputable and questionable websites based on an analysis of these factors.
Credibility
This document discusses credibility and provides tips for finding credible information online. It defines credibility as having accuracy, coverage, objectivity, and an authoritative source. The document recommends two credible databases for biographical information, Biography.com from the Biography Channel and the Academy of Achievement. It notes that databases are trustworthy, organized, time-saving, and full of information. It also provides login credentials for the ABC Clio and Britannica Online databases.
Website Validity
This document discusses S.P.I.D.E.R., a method for evaluating the validity and reliability of websites. S.P.I.D.E.R. stands for Source, Purpose, Information, Domain, Educational value, and Reliability. It provides guidelines for analyzing the source and author of a website, the purpose and potential biases, the relevance and currency of information, implications of the domain extension, depth and quality of content, and whether the same information can be found on other reliable sites. The document also warns that search engine rankings do not guarantee a site's validity and that Wikipedia should be used cautiously as a source for school projects.
Searching the Internet
This document provides guidance for students on effectively searching the internet. It discusses preparing searches by making lists of relevant terms and excluding unwanted terms. Boolean operators like AND, OR, and NOT can be used to combine search terms. Students are advised to evaluate websites for accuracy, authority, and currency before using the information. Proper citation of internet sources is also covered, including examples of in-text citations and works cited entries. Overall, the document emphasizes the importance of planning searches in order to find high-quality information efficiently.
Research power point for students
This document provides guidance on effective internet searching strategies. It discusses defining your search topic, identifying appropriate search locations, developing effective search queries, and evaluating the credibility of sources. Key recommendations include planning your search offline first by identifying questions and keywords. When searching, consider specialized databases and directories instead of only major search engines. Techniques for evaluating sources include examining the URL, domain, author credentials, and date of publication. Sources should be cross-referenced from different credible locations.
Website Evaluation Presentation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and quality in order to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite for school assignments. It recommends using the Five W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - as a framework to analyze the author's credentials, purpose of site, date of publication, domain type, and sources cited. Students are reminded to consider more than one website and also use print resources, as the quality of sources impacts teachers' evaluation of student work. Being a careful evaluator is important for making informed decisions.
Website Evaluation
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, questions are provided to help assess different aspects, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, understanding biases present, and verifying facts through other sources. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and credibility for research.
Online Searching Tips
This document summarizes online searching tips presented by Mindy McAdams from the University of Florida. It discusses advanced search options on Google, evaluating the trustworthiness of websites, investigating website sources, top-level domains, open directories, the Wayback Machine, health information resources, blog searching, and using critical thinking to evaluate online information.
Evaluating websites edit
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for research purposes. It discusses looking at the credibility and authority of the author, accuracy and reliability of the information, date of publication, and sources cited. Some factors to consider include the purpose of the site, biases, and what the URL reveals about the domain and organization responsible for the site. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than just accepting sources at face value.
Wiki credibility
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of Wikipedia articles. It provides the CARS method for evaluation, which stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. Credibility can be evaluated by looking at whether articles have citations and were recently edited. Accuracy is suggested by recent edits and flags for articles needing improvement. Reasonableness is questioned if articles are flagged as biased. Support is indicated by other articles linking to it and viewing edit histories. Protected pages that require special permission to edit are also likely more credible.
Cruz s professional ethics student lesson powerpoint
This document outlines a lesson plan for teaching digital literacy and responsibility to students. It covers topics such as plagiarism, citations, copyright, privacy, and challenges to library materials. The teacher provides definitions and examples of these concepts, as well as lists online resources for students to reference. The goal is for students to properly utilize information from other sources in their schoolwork.
What's hot (17)
Cruz s professional ethics student lesson powerpoint
Cruz s professional ethics student lesson powerpoint
Viewers also liked
13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential deception from websites, blogs, and wikis and emphasizes the need to approach online information with care and scrutiny.
11 2 t4_chapter11powerpoint
The document discusses the power and importance of language. It explains that language can be used to describe, define concepts, and shape cultural norms. Descriptions, definitions, and acceptable language can vary based on context and culture. Language can also be used to mislead through ambiguity, loaded words, propaganda, and hate speech. However, language also has the power to transform society for good when used to inspire, uplift, and call people to action for positive change.
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
The document discusses different types of logical relationships between categorical propositions:
1) Contraries are propositions that cannot both be true but could both be false, with one being necessarily false if the other is true.
2) Subcontraries are propositions that cannot both be false but could both be true, with one being necessarily true if the other is false.
3) Contradictories are propositions that cannot both be true or both be false.
It also discusses inferences that can be drawn between categorical propositions, including subalternation, obversion, conversion, and contraposition.
Prayer for Poverty, Chastity and Obedience
The document contains three prayers requesting different gifts from God. The first prayer asks for the gift of poverty and to reveal any excessive attachments that prevent a complete "Yes" to God. It asks to learn to rely on God's presence rather than material comforts. The second prayer asks for the gift of chastity and purity to strengthen the body, spirit and soul. The third prayer requests the gift of obedience to listen to God's will and live in obedience through contemplation and service.
Preachers of Grace, Witnesses to the Resurrection
A presentation on Mary Catherine Hilkert, OP's article
A course requirement on the Spirituality of the Preacher (2nd semester 2012-13)
15 2 t4echapter15_powerpoint(2)
The document provides an overview of legal reasoning skills and the LSAT exam. It discusses the range of legal reasoning skills, including analyzing arguments and precedents. It explains how precedents from previous similar cases can help or hinder new cases. It also outlines the four sections of the LSAT exam and provides tips for the reading comprehension and analytical reasoning sections.
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
The document discusses different types of logical relationships between categorical propositions:
1) Contraries are propositions that cannot both be true but could both be false, with one being necessarily false if the other is true.
2) Subcontraries are propositions that cannot both be false but could both be true, with one being necessarily true if the other is false.
3) Contradictories are propositions that cannot both be true or both be false.
It also discusses inferences that can be drawn between categorical propositions, including subalternation, obversion, conversion, and contraposition.
4 2 t4_chapterfourpowerpoint
The document discusses different types of logical propositions and logical connectives. It defines propositions, tautologies, contradictions, and contingent claims. It then explains the different types of compound propositions using logical connectives such as conjunctions, disjunctions, negations, conditionals, and biconditionals. Various logical forms are also summarized, such as categorical propositions, Demorgan's laws, transposition, material implication, exportation, and equivalence.
14b 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint
The document provides guidance on critically analyzing popular culture works through examining both their context and content. It emphasizes the importance of considering the context, such as the intended audience, socio-political climate, and any corporate or ideological influences. When assessing the content, it recommends analyzing elements like genre, plot, characters, narrative elements, and interpreting different levels of meaning. The tools outlined help readers develop a sophisticated understanding of popular culture.
3 -2 t4-chapter_three_powerpoint_w_teays
This document provides guidance on analyzing arguments and articles through critical thinking. It discusses evaluating evidence, including facts, testimony, statistics, and different types of reasoning. It provides a checklist for weighing evidence and outlines how to structure an analysis. Key points include examining an argument's thesis, approach, claims, and quality of support, as well as looking for bias, assumptions, and weaknesses in the reasoning. The goal is to assess how convincingly the case is made and determine if it is persuasive.
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
The document discusses syllogisms, which are logical arguments with two premises and a conclusion. It defines the key components of a syllogism, including terms, validity, categorical propositions, and the four figures or patterns that a syllogism can take. Rules for syllogisms are also outlined, such as that the middle term must be distributed at least once and premises and conclusions must align in terms of positive and negative forms.
12 2 t4_chaptertwelvepowerpointw_teays
The document discusses advertising techniques and assumptions. It analyzes how ads today are more subtle and sophisticated than in the past. Ads routinely make assumptions about consumers' needs, desires, fears and prejudices. Key fallacies used in advertising include appeals to popularity, improper appeals to authority, accentuating words to distort meaning, presenting only two choices when more exist, and creating ambiguities through double meanings. Effective ads use shame, optimism, solutions and rationales to sell products by addressing perceived problems.
How to connect Literature with Cinema?
This document summarizes and compares literature works that were adapted into films. It discusses how the 1913 film Raja Harishchandra was based on Indian epics Ramayana and Mahabharata. It also analyzes similarities and differences between the novel and film versions of The Guide, and between Shakespeare's play Hamlet and the film Haider. While the stories, settings and some characters translate between works, the films also make changes to suit the new eras and means of expression. Overall, the document examines how art forms can enrich each other through adaptation while maintaining independent artistic value.
7 2 t4_chaptersevenpowerpoint
This document provides an overview of common types of fallacies, which are misleading or deceptive arguments. It discusses four major categories of fallacies: fallacies of relevance, fallacies of presumption, fallacies of ambiguity, and formal fallacies. For each category, it provides examples and explanations of specific fallacies such as ad hominem attacks, slippery slope arguments, equivocation, affirming the consequent, and more.
T whitley unit 5 project
This is one of many assignments from my Psychological Profiling course at Kaplan University, completed during my time there as a student, on Dec. 6, 2011.
Inductive methods
The document discusses several methods of inductive argumentation described by John Stuart Mill for drawing general conclusions from specific observations or facts. These include the method of agreement, method of difference, joint method of agreement and difference, method of residues, and method of concomitant variations. Examples are provided to illustrate each method and how they can be used to infer causal relationships between phenomena based on commonalities and differences observed across multiple instances.
Scientific Methods of Inquiry (2 of 5)
- A brief presentation on Method of Agreement and Method of Difference (2 out of Mill's 5 Canons)
- For USTGS 1st semester 2013-14
5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint
This document provides an overview of deductive and inductive reasoning, including the key differences between the two. It defines deductive arguments as those where the premises are sufficient to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Inductive arguments, on the other hand, can only provide partial or probabilistic support for the conclusion because there is always a "wedge of doubt" between the premises and conclusion. The document also outlines different types of deductive arguments like categorical syllogisms and modus ponens, as well as examples of inductive arguments involving predictions, cause and effect, analogy, and statistics.
Quiz show inductive & deductive reasoning
The document discusses the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning. It provides examples of statements using each type of reasoning. Deductive reasoning draws conclusions based on general rules or principles, while inductive reasoning draws conclusions based on observations or a collection of evidence, even if limited. However, both types of reasoning can lead to incorrect conclusions if not applied carefully. Stereotypes in particular are usually formed through inductive or deductive reasoning but are not always accurate.
Inductive and Deductive Methods of Archetypal Criticism
This document provides information about Northrop Frye's archetypal criticism approach. It discusses two types of criticism - meaningful criticism based on philosophy and history, and meaningless criticism. It also outlines Frye's inductive and deductive methods of archetypal analysis. The inductive method proceeds from particular truths in a text to broader truths, while the deductive method establishes the meaning of a work from general truths. It compares literature to music and painting in having rhythmic and patterned elements.
Viewers also liked (20)
Inductive and Deductive Methods of Archetypal Criticism
Inductive and Deductive Methods of Archetypal Criticism
Similar to 13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
Web site evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It begins by explaining that unlike printed materials, websites are not edited and fact checked, so not all information online is useful or accurate. It then outlines criteria to consider when evaluating websites, including authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Specific questions are provided for each criteria. The document emphasizes that no single criteria determines a website's value and that the criteria should be considered together. Students are assigned an exercise to practice evaluating websites using the outlined criteria.
Evaluating sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources for use in answering questions on an online reference service. It outlines six criteria for evaluating sources: authority, currency, objectivity, coverage, accuracy/verifiability, and relevance. For each criterion, it provides examples and questions to consider to determine how well the source meets that standard of evaluation. The goal is to select sources that will provide high-quality, unbiased information to answer users' questions completely and appropriately.
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It recommends asking questions about the author's expertise, potential biases, use of evidence, and publication venue. Credible sources include well-established websites from experts in the field, as well as mainstream news sites. Government and educational websites ending in .gov and .edu require additional scrutiny. Fact-checking sites can help verify questionable information. Overall, critical evaluation of sources is important to determine what can reasonably be considered factual.
Web Site Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It discusses that unlike printed materials, websites are not edited and information online is not always accurate. It then outlines criteria to evaluate websites, including authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. The document explains each criterion in detail and provides examples and questions to consider for each one. The overall message is that students should carefully analyze websites using these criteria before determining their value for research.
Web Site Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It discusses how the internet has changed research and that not all online information is accurate. It then outlines five criteria for evaluating websites: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. The document explains each of these criteria in detail and provides examples to illustrate how to apply them when assessing the reliability of information on a given website. The overall message is that students need to carefully evaluate websites using these standards to determine their value for research.
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability and credibility of information sources. It discusses five key factors to consider: currency, accuracy, authority, relevance, and purpose. Currency refers to how up-to-date the information is. Accuracy means the information is supported by facts and evidence. Authority is the credentials and expertise of the author. Relevance is how closely the information relates to the topic. Purpose considers why the source was created and potential biases. Students are encouraged to think critically about sources by investigating these factors.
You’re not a dog
This document provides guidance on establishing an online presence as a lawyer. It discusses ethics rules regarding communications about legal services and advises authentic engagement over spamming or deception. Key recommendations include listening to audiences, asking questions, responding promptly, demonstrating expertise through articles and links, and establishing a genuine voice. The document warns that all online actions are public and permanent, and encourages developing useful, unique content to meet information demands while avoiding stock images or identities.
You’re Not A Dog: How Lawyers Can Put Their Best Foot Forward Online
As famous New Yorker cartoon goes, “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” But as a lawyer, “being a dog” may cost you your two most valuable assets, your reputation and your license.
Further, as the web continues to “go social”, web users will become better at identifying dogs. Let’s talk about how you can put your best foot forward online in an ethical, as well as, effective manner.
This slide deck is courtesy Gyi Tsakalakis, of AttorneySync.com. Gyi has been helping lawyers understand how to put the web to work for their practices since 2008. A former practicing attorney, Gyi is a law firm web strategist and owner at AttorneySync.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. CARRDSS stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reliability, Relevance, Date, Sources, Scope. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating online sources to ensure high quality information is being used for research and academic work.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It discusses evaluating the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Criteria like author credentials, publisher, inclusion of about/contact pages, consistency with other sources, and presence of errors can help determine a site's accuracy and credibility. The domain name suffix can also provide clues about a site's potential biases. High-quality sources are important for research and ensuring informed decision making. Teachers will evaluate student work based on the quality of sources cited.
Evaluating Information Sources
This document discusses criteria for evaluating information sources, including accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains questions to ask about each criterion, such as whether information is cited, who is responsible for the content, potential biases, publication dates, and scope. Website domains like .edu, .gov and .org are generally more reliable than .com, but all sources require evaluating based on these five criteria.
Research Presentation
The document provides information on evaluating sources found on the internet. It discusses how Wikipedia may not be a reliable academic source due to lack of editorial oversight. It also discusses how to determine the authority, objectivity, currency and coverage of a website to evaluate if it is a good source. The document provides examples of citation styles and discusses avoiding plagiarism by properly citing sources.
Website Evaluation Tutorial
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency means how recently information/links were updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Librarians can also assist with difficult-to-evaluate sites.
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency evaluates how recently the site was updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Considering the criteria together provides a holistic evaluation of a website's reliability and usefulness.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for credibility and reliability to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite in a research paper. It outlines several criteria to consider, including assessing the author's credentials, accuracy and bias of the information, date of publication, documentation of sources, and purpose and intended audience of the site. Students are encouraged to think critically about the credibility of online information and not rely solely on free websites, but also use library databases and consult their teacher-librarian for source recommendations.
Online Research (2)
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider that can help determine whether a site is a good source of information or not. The document also provides some tips on using search engines like Google to investigate authors, sponsors and potential biases. It recommends additional online research resources available through the HISD library system.
Criteria
This document provides criteria for evaluating the quality and reliability of information found on websites. It discusses 6 key criteria: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage, and clarity. For each criterion, the document explains why it is important and provides examples of both reliable and unreliable websites to illustrate how to apply each criterion when assessing websites. The overall message is that anyone can publish anything on the internet, so it is important to carefully evaluate websites using established criteria before trusting the information they contain.
Online Research
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider in determining whether a site meets that standard, such as checking for author credentials, obvious mistakes, biased or inflammatory language, dated content, and usability of navigation. The document advises using search engines like Google to investigate authors and sponsors when information is missing from sites, and provides additional tips for effective online research.
Can you trust_the_web
The document discusses how to evaluate information found on the web through careful analysis. It provides four key steps: 1) examine the URL and publisher to determine potential biases, 2) investigate the author's credentials and expertise on the topic, 3) check the date to ensure currency, and 4) analyze the purpose and potential biases in presentation of the information. The document stresses the importance of skepticism when evaluating online sources, as there are no standards regulating information accuracy on the web like in published sources.
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27Riverside County Office of Education
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It discusses how information can spread quickly online before being verified. Readers are encouraged to scrutinize sources by considering whether the author is an expert, has an agenda, and cites evidence. Search engines like SweetSearch that curate reliable sources are recommended. The conclusion emphasizes that credible ideas will be supported by many trustworthy sources and the scientific process rather than just emotion or a single perspective.Similar to 13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays (20)
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
You’re Not A Dog: How Lawyers Can Put Their Best Foot Forward Online
You’re Not A Dog: How Lawyers Can Put Their Best Foot Forward Online
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
More from sagebennet
Existentialism sartre etc.-
Existentialism was concerned with radical freedom, the nature of being, and responsibility. Key figures included Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Martin Heidegger, and Edmund Husserl. Sartre believed that existence precedes essence, meaning humans define themselves through their actions rather than having a predetermined nature. For Sartre, people are condemned to be free without excuses or God, resulting in anguish over absolute responsibility. De Beauvoir applied existentialist thought to feminism, arguing that womanhood is a social construct used to oppress women. Phenomenology focused on investigating conscious experiences without assumptions, while Heidegger explored the question of being and our tendency to get lost
New thought
New Thought is a distinctively American religious movement that began in the 19th century based on the ideas that thoughts can create reality and healing. It emphasizes the power of the mind in areas like intuition, spiritual healing, and creating one's own reality through affirmative prayer and meditation. Some key figures in the development of New Thought include Ralph Waldo Emerson, Phineas Quimby, Mary Baker Eddy, and Ernest Holmes. The document contrasts the concepts of visualization, which uses premeditated ideas, and visioning, which tries to let visions come without preconceptions in order to be pulled by a higher vision.
10a chaptertenpowerpoint new
The document discusses various rules of inference used in deductive reasoning. It defines validity and provides examples of valid argument forms like modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism, and disjunctive syllogism. It also discusses fallacies like affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent that invalidate arguments despite having true premises. The document aims to explain logical reasoning tools to evaluate arguments.
8 chapter eightpowerpoint
This document summarizes key concepts in causal and statistical reasoning. It discusses cause and effect relationships, associations versus causal relationships, and fallacies involving false correlations. It also outlines philosopher John Stuart Mill's methods for determining causation, including the method of agreement, method of difference, joint method, and method of concomitant variation. Finally, it discusses aspects of statistical studies such as sample size, diversity, and margin of error, as well as the forms and strength of statistical arguments.
14b 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint
The document provides guidance on critically analyzing popular culture works through examining both their context and content. It emphasizes the importance of considering the context, such as the intended audience, socio-political climate, and any underlying agendas. When assessing the content, it recommends analyzing elements like genre, plot, characters, narrative impact, and levels of interpretation. The tools outlined help readers look beneath the surface and draw meaningful insights about the influences and reflections of society within various popular works.
14a 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint_new
This document discusses the important role that journalists play in society by reporting news and analyzing issues in historical and political context. It warns against "tabloidism" and focuses too much on sensational stories rather than more significant issues. The document also emphasizes that a free press is vital for a democratic society by presenting a range of perspectives to help citizens become informed and think for themselves.
6 2 t4_chaptersixpowerpoint
The document discusses the use and analysis of analogical reasoning. It explains that an argument from analogy compares two things based on similarities to assert that a characteristic true of one thing is also true of the other. Analogies are commonly used in law, where previous cases set precedents that lawyers and judges use to reason about new cases. The document provides guidance on analyzing analogies, including identifying similarities and differences, and assessing whether an analogy is strong or weak based on the relative weight of the similarities versus differences. It also discusses how hypothetical scenarios are used in legal training to prepare students for analogical reasoning in applying laws and precedents to new cases.
4 2 t4_chapterfourpowerpoint
The document discusses different types of logical propositions and logical connectives. It defines propositions, tautologies, contradictions, and contingent claims. It then explains the structure of simple and compound propositions. The five logical connectives - conjunction, disjunction, negation, conditional, and biconditional - are defined. Various propositional forms are also described, including categorical propositions, conditional claims, and equivalence. Logical rules like DeMorgan's laws, transposition, material implication, exportation, and equivalence are outlined.
2 2 t4e_chapter_two_powerpoint_new1
The document discusses the components of an argument, including the thesis/conclusion and premises/evidence. It provides examples of how to describe facts versus inferences and how to analyze arguments by identifying assumptions, locating the conclusion, evaluating the strength of evidence/premises, and putting arguments in standard form. Transition words are also discussed.
1 2 t4_chapter_one_powerpoint_new
The document provides an overview of critical thinking skills and discusses addressing obstacles to developing those skills. It defines stereotypes as overgeneralizations that can bog down thinking and provides examples. It also discusses adopting multiple perspectives, recognizing biased language, and analyzing arguments by evaluating their structure and the truth of any premises.
Indigeneous religions
The document discusses several aspects of indigenous religions around the world including those of ancient Hawaiians, Native Americans, Inuit, Aboriginal Australians, and Maori of New Zealand. It covers obstacles to appreciating these religions, modern recovery efforts, and key elements like a respectful relationship with nature, the concepts of sacred time and space, the importance of origins, gods, and ancestors, and sacred practices like rituals and ceremonies. The document also addresses current threats facing indigenous religions from globalization, loss of lands and languages, and religious conversion.
Slide Show on Global Citizenship
The document discusses ways for people of all religious traditions to offer service and act as global citizens. It defines a global citizen as someone who is knowledgeable about other cultures beyond their own, understands global interdependence, and is committed to sustainability and social change. It provides examples of how to practice global citizenship, such as questioning stereotypes, celebrating diversity, thinking critically about global issues, and taking action against injustice.
Affirmative action 1
Affirmative action aims to remedy past discrimination and promote equal opportunity in employment and education by giving preferential treatment to minorities and women who have faced unjust mistreatment. Weak affirmative action, which ensures equal consideration without preferences, is less controversial than strong affirmative action, which actively prefers some groups over others to compensate for historical injustices and achieve diversity. Debates around affirmative action consider whether racial preferences for any group are justified or if they can be counterproductive.
More from sagebennet (13)
Recently uploaded
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Join Maher Hanafi, VP of Engineering at Betterworks, in this new session where he'll share a practical framework to transform Gen AI prototypes into impactful products! He'll delve into the complexities of data collection and management, model selection and optimization, and ensuring security, scalability, and responsible use.
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentationsGraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
Uni Systems Copilot event_05062024_C.Vlachos.pdf
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
ここ3000字までしか入らないけどタイトルの方がたくさん文字入ると思います。
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...
This talk will give hands-on advice on building RAG applications with an open-source Milvus database deployed as a docker container. We will also introduce the integration of Milvus with Snowpark Container Services.
Introducing Milvus Lite: Easy-to-Install, Easy-to-Use vector database for you...
Join us to introduce Milvus Lite, a vector database that can run on notebooks and laptops, share the same API with Milvus, and integrate with every popular GenAI framework. This webinar is perfect for developers seeking easy-to-use, well-integrated vector databases for their GenAI apps.
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Recently uploaded (20)
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Alt. GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using ...
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AI
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
GraphSummit Singapore | Graphing Success: Revolutionising Organisational Stru...
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...
Building RAG with self-deployed Milvus vector database and Snowpark Container...
Introducing Milvus Lite: Easy-to-Install, Easy-to-Use vector database for you...
Introducing Milvus Lite: Easy-to-Install, Easy-to-Use vector database for you...
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
- 1. Chapter 13 Web Sight: Critical Thinking and the Internet Second Thoughts, 4th ed . Wanda Teays McGraw-Hill Higher Ed ©2010. Wanda Teays. All Rights Reserved.