The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential inaccuracies or biases that can exist in blogs, wikis, and other open content due to a lack of oversight or verification of author qualifications.
This document outlines an instruction session on evaluating online resources. It includes tips for developing effective search strategies using keywords and Boolean operators. It also provides guidelines for evaluating websites using the CRAP test, which analyzes the currency, reliability, authority, and purpose/point of view of resources. Students are instructed to apply these skills by analyzing example websites and documenting their findings in a shared spreadsheet. Contact information is provided for the librarian leading the session.
This document provides an overview of a library instruction session on research skills. It introduces Laksamee Putnam as the instructor and lists her contact information. It discusses getting writing help at the library and outlines an agenda that includes evaluating online information sources using the CRAP test to assess currency, reliability, authority, and purpose/point of view. Search techniques like keywords, Boolean operators, truncation, and phrase searching are also covered. Students are instructed to analyze websites and enter information into an online worksheet.
This document discusses evaluating the credibility and reliability of information sources on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of authors, publications, and websites. These include checking for author credentials, publication affiliations, evidence that other credible sites link to the source, and consistency of information across sources. The document emphasizes applying critical thinking to evaluate sources based on the research task, rather than making absolute judgments of credibility. It also notes the role of librarians in helping evaluate online information and detect truth.
This document provides an orientation for a digital tattoo website aimed at helping students manage their online identity. It discusses how youth are increasingly sharing personal information online through social media in ways that can have long-term implications. The website aims to teach digital literacy skills through interactive lessons on managing privacy settings, being aware of permanent online records, and developing good digital citizenship. Usage statistics show the website has reached a wide audience.
This document outlines an instructional library session on conducting research online. It introduces the instructor, Laksamee Putnam, and provides her contact information. It then discusses getting writing help at the library and outlines an agenda for the session, which includes evaluating online resources, developing effective keywords, and analyzing websites using the CRAP test for currency, reliability, authority, and purpose/point of view. Students are instructed to fill out an online worksheet throughout the lesson to document their research topics, keywords, and website evaluations. The document provides tips for advanced search techniques and encourages students to find scholarly sources to use in their papers.
This document discusses how to identify fake news and evaluate information sources. It provides tips on asking four basic questions - what, who, why, when - to analyze a source's relevance, authority, objectivity and timeliness. For example, if a source lacks an identifiable author or organization, or does not provide unbiased information, it should not be trusted. The document also lists several fact-checking websites that can be used to verify claims. Overall, it emphasizes the importance of carefully assessing the quality and reliability of information found online.
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources for research. It defines a credible source as one that can be trusted, is agreed upon by other sources, is up-to-date, comes from a respected author or organization, provides clear information about the author/organization, and is not biased. It notes that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone so its accuracy cannot be guaranteed, while .edu, .org, and .gov websites tend to be more credible. It provides tips for evaluating sources like checking copyright dates, references, and professionalism of the website.
The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential inaccuracies or biases that can exist in blogs, wikis, and other open content due to a lack of oversight or verification of author qualifications.
This document outlines an instruction session on evaluating online resources. It includes tips for developing effective search strategies using keywords and Boolean operators. It also provides guidelines for evaluating websites using the CRAP test, which analyzes the currency, reliability, authority, and purpose/point of view of resources. Students are instructed to apply these skills by analyzing example websites and documenting their findings in a shared spreadsheet. Contact information is provided for the librarian leading the session.
This document provides an overview of a library instruction session on research skills. It introduces Laksamee Putnam as the instructor and lists her contact information. It discusses getting writing help at the library and outlines an agenda that includes evaluating online information sources using the CRAP test to assess currency, reliability, authority, and purpose/point of view. Search techniques like keywords, Boolean operators, truncation, and phrase searching are also covered. Students are instructed to analyze websites and enter information into an online worksheet.
This document discusses evaluating the credibility and reliability of information sources on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of authors, publications, and websites. These include checking for author credentials, publication affiliations, evidence that other credible sites link to the source, and consistency of information across sources. The document emphasizes applying critical thinking to evaluate sources based on the research task, rather than making absolute judgments of credibility. It also notes the role of librarians in helping evaluate online information and detect truth.
This document provides an orientation for a digital tattoo website aimed at helping students manage their online identity. It discusses how youth are increasingly sharing personal information online through social media in ways that can have long-term implications. The website aims to teach digital literacy skills through interactive lessons on managing privacy settings, being aware of permanent online records, and developing good digital citizenship. Usage statistics show the website has reached a wide audience.
This document outlines an instructional library session on conducting research online. It introduces the instructor, Laksamee Putnam, and provides her contact information. It then discusses getting writing help at the library and outlines an agenda for the session, which includes evaluating online resources, developing effective keywords, and analyzing websites using the CRAP test for currency, reliability, authority, and purpose/point of view. Students are instructed to fill out an online worksheet throughout the lesson to document their research topics, keywords, and website evaluations. The document provides tips for advanced search techniques and encourages students to find scholarly sources to use in their papers.
This document discusses how to identify fake news and evaluate information sources. It provides tips on asking four basic questions - what, who, why, when - to analyze a source's relevance, authority, objectivity and timeliness. For example, if a source lacks an identifiable author or organization, or does not provide unbiased information, it should not be trusted. The document also lists several fact-checking websites that can be used to verify claims. Overall, it emphasizes the importance of carefully assessing the quality and reliability of information found online.
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources for research. It defines a credible source as one that can be trusted, is agreed upon by other sources, is up-to-date, comes from a respected author or organization, provides clear information about the author/organization, and is not biased. It notes that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone so its accuracy cannot be guaranteed, while .edu, .org, and .gov websites tend to be more credible. It provides tips for evaluating sources like checking copyright dates, references, and professionalism of the website.
Web Site Evaluation, Cultural ResearchLisa Hartman
This document discusses criteria for evaluating the trustworthiness and reliability of information found on websites:
Credibility refers to the qualifications and trustworthiness of the source of the information. Accuracy means the information is consistent with other reliable sources and not obviously false. Bias/objectivity examines whether all viewpoints are represented or if the purpose is to entertain, persuade, or inform. Timeliness considers how recently the information was published and whether outdated information would impact its usefulness. Relevance evaluates whether the information is appropriate for the intended audience and topic.
This document discusses how to identify fake news and evaluate the reliability of news sources. It begins by defining fake news as intentionally deceptive information created to mislead readers, often by playing on biases. While fake news has existed for a long time, it is especially prevalent online. The document provides tips on how to determine the truthfulness of a claim, including checking if a source provides evidence from reputable studies or if it is trying to convince readers of a particular viewpoint. It recommends vetting sources by checking their domain extension and researching their credibility. Examples are given to show how to compare news sites for reliability and biases. Readers are encouraged to fact check questionable claims from social media by investigating stories from trusted news outlets.
Handling fake news and eyewitness mediaAlastair Reid
How to debunk hoaxes effectively, deal with graphic images and understand copyright on social media – as presented at the 2016 Online News Association annual conference
This document provides information about a library workshop on conducting research. It introduces Laksamee Putnam as the instructor and includes her contact information. The agenda covers developing search strategies using keywords, evaluating online resources using the CRAP test, and finding relevant websites and articles on a sample topic. Participants are encouraged to use Boolean operators and truncation to improve their searches and to analyze any resources they find according to currency, reliability, authority and purpose.
The document discusses the history and reasons for fake news, how to identify it, and efforts by search engines and social media platforms to curb its spread. It notes that fake news has existed for centuries, often for financial or propaganda reasons. Recent examples spread for clicks and advertising revenue. The document outlines techniques for verifying news claims, such as checking dates, sources, images and details. It acknowledges challenges given platforms often promote engaging content that confirms biases. Search engines and Facebook are working on solutions but their algorithms remain imperfect and sometimes promote false stories.
Fake news: Identifying, debunking and discussing false narratives with learnersLearningandTeaching
Fake news. It was the 2017 word of the year, but how is it understood by the student of today?
Students today are often heavily engaged in the online community, moving in social spheres that may be foreign to their teachers. With studies revealing that 48% of Australians now use social media as a news source, it is increasingly important for educators to understand how their students are engaging with online content and communities. As educators, we must equip ourselves with the tools and skillsets needed to debunk false, misleading and biased content and to show our students how to do the same.
In these slides, Alyce Hogg introduces the drivers of fake news, from online communities like ‘Reddit’ and ‘4chan’, to bots and content mills. Alyce also provides strategies and resources for identifying and debunking fake news, and suggests approaches for discussing fake news with students.
Searching and Evaluating the Web (General)stonca01
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses elements that indicate a website is a quality resource, such as the authority and qualifications of the author, the purpose and maintenance of the site, and whether the content is factual and objective. Good elements include .edu and .gov URLs, clear authorship by experts, and frequent updates. The document encourages students to consider these criteria when selecting a website for a class assignment and posting their finding in a discussion board. It aims to help students distinguish high-quality sources online.
This document summarizes Rob Ennals' work on developing a "Dispute Finder" tool to help users identify when information they encounter online is disputed by other credible sources. The tool includes a browser extension that highlights disputed claims on web pages, and links to sources supporting or opposing the claim. It also mines the web for patterns indicating disputed claims and labels the claims through crowdsourcing. Key challenges discussed include filtering ambiguous claims, scaling entailment detection, and determining what should count as a disputed claim. User studies found people were frustrated by a low number of highlighted claims and confused about how specific claims should be.
This document discusses issues related to children and youth's use of technology and social media. It provides statistics on how much time youth spend online and what activities they engage in. It also discusses privacy and safety concerns like oversharing personal information, cyberbullying, and exposure to inappropriate content. The document advocates teaching digital literacy and citizenship skills to help youth navigate these challenges and harness the benefits of technology.
This document discusses the permanence and visibility of children's digital footprints online. It notes that many children have computers in their bedrooms and spend 2-3 hours per day online. However, 41% of children ages 8 to 17 include personal information like email addresses and phone numbers in visible social media profiles. The document warns that anything posted online can create a "digital tattoo" that is highly visible and hard to remove.
This document outlines an instruction session presented by Laksamee Putnam on evaluating online resources. It discusses using the CRAP test to assess currency, reliability, authority and purpose/point of view. Students learn to develop effective keywords for their research topics and search for relevant websites using those keywords in Google and the library's guide to the web. The session concludes with students assessing their found resources and completing a worksheet.
This document discusses S.P.I.D.E.R., a method for evaluating the validity and reliability of websites. S.P.I.D.E.R. stands for Source, Purpose, Information, Domain, Educational value, and Reliability. It provides guidelines for analyzing the source and author of a website, the purpose and potential biases, the relevance and currency of information, implications of the domain extension, depth and quality of content, and whether the same information can be found on other reliable sites. The document also warns that search engine rankings do not guarantee a site's validity and that Wikipedia should be used cautiously as a source for school projects.
This document provides information on identifying and avoiding fake news. It discusses that distinguishing real from fake news is an important skill, and the objective is to help readers better identify fake news and avoid using those sources for scholarly research. It then provides tips on spotting fake news such as checking the author and source credibility, verifying images are being used correctly in context, and using fact-checking websites and browser extensions. Questionable aspects of news stories are outlined, such as sensationalized headlines, lack of multiple sources reporting on the story, and stories designed to appeal more to emotions than facts.
This document provides tips on using social media to promote yourself professionally. It notes that social media use is widespread, especially among younger generations. Traditional media like newspapers are declining. The document encourages establishing an online presence on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and blogs. It stresses maintaining an active, positive online profile to showcase expertise and personality. Having a strong online reputation through social media can help with job searching and business development. Privacy settings should be used carefully on more personal sites like Facebook.
Doug Caruso, assistant metro editor at The Columbus Dispatch, prepared this presentation on producing data-driven enterprise stories off your beat for Columbus, Ohio, NewsTrain on Oct. 21, 2017. It is accompanied by a handout of the same title. NewsTrain is a training initiative of Associated Press Media Editors (APME). More info: http://bit.ly/NewsTrain
1) Adults were generally able to competently search the internet to answer questions, though some were frustrated by large amounts of irrelevant information. They tended to choose websites that were .edu or .gov and had visual elements like pictures.
2) The survey asked adults questions about internet usage and had them search for active volcanoes. Most used Google and found the most active volcano in the US. They slightly favored less credible websites that had more visuals.
3) Using this inquiry with students would require simplifying searches and teaching credible research skills and plagiarism avoidance. Students may have more difficulty but it could help them learn benchmark internet skills.
The document provides an overview of social media best practices based on the author's experience. It recommends starting by participating in social media communities to learn, then thinking through goals and policies before picking appropriate tools. Key steps include measuring metrics before and after campaigns, listening and engaging during campaigns, and identifying lessons learned to improve future efforts. The overall message is that social media is about building relationships and having conversations, not just broadcasting messages.
The document provides information for parents on internet safety. It discusses federal laws like COPPA that protect children's privacy online. It emphasizes that the best protection is open communication between parents and children, and monitoring children's computer use. It also provides resources on internet safety organizations, understanding technology trends and language, researching sex offenders locally, and dealing with cyberbullying issues.
The document discusses social networking sites like Facebook and LinkedIn. It provides information on the history and popularity of Facebook, founded by Mark Zuckerberg. Benefits of social networking include staying connected with friends and family, sharing photos and news, and building professional networks. However, excessive time spent online and oversharing personal information can have downsides. The document recommends managing your online profile carefully and using LinkedIn for professional networking opportunities.
This SIDLIT 2019 roundtable discussion focused on strategies for verifying and counteracting media bias, fake news, and the various forms of half-truths that are becoming ubiquitous in our national dialog. The discussion will include examples of media bias and alternative facts as well as positive steps that educators and technologists can take to encourage critical thinking as opposed to blind acceptance of news from the plethora of sources now available.
This document outlines the requirements for a mini project on a company's profile, including sections on the company, industry, human resources, marketing, production, and finance departments. Specifically, it provides 20+ data points to include for the company profile, such as name, address, year established, mission/vision. It also lists 14+ items to cover for the industry profile, like market structure, import/export details. Finally, it details 12+ topics to discuss for each of the functional departments within the company, including department structure, policies, processes, and performance.
Web Site Evaluation, Cultural ResearchLisa Hartman
This document discusses criteria for evaluating the trustworthiness and reliability of information found on websites:
Credibility refers to the qualifications and trustworthiness of the source of the information. Accuracy means the information is consistent with other reliable sources and not obviously false. Bias/objectivity examines whether all viewpoints are represented or if the purpose is to entertain, persuade, or inform. Timeliness considers how recently the information was published and whether outdated information would impact its usefulness. Relevance evaluates whether the information is appropriate for the intended audience and topic.
This document discusses how to identify fake news and evaluate the reliability of news sources. It begins by defining fake news as intentionally deceptive information created to mislead readers, often by playing on biases. While fake news has existed for a long time, it is especially prevalent online. The document provides tips on how to determine the truthfulness of a claim, including checking if a source provides evidence from reputable studies or if it is trying to convince readers of a particular viewpoint. It recommends vetting sources by checking their domain extension and researching their credibility. Examples are given to show how to compare news sites for reliability and biases. Readers are encouraged to fact check questionable claims from social media by investigating stories from trusted news outlets.
Handling fake news and eyewitness mediaAlastair Reid
How to debunk hoaxes effectively, deal with graphic images and understand copyright on social media – as presented at the 2016 Online News Association annual conference
This document provides information about a library workshop on conducting research. It introduces Laksamee Putnam as the instructor and includes her contact information. The agenda covers developing search strategies using keywords, evaluating online resources using the CRAP test, and finding relevant websites and articles on a sample topic. Participants are encouraged to use Boolean operators and truncation to improve their searches and to analyze any resources they find according to currency, reliability, authority and purpose.
The document discusses the history and reasons for fake news, how to identify it, and efforts by search engines and social media platforms to curb its spread. It notes that fake news has existed for centuries, often for financial or propaganda reasons. Recent examples spread for clicks and advertising revenue. The document outlines techniques for verifying news claims, such as checking dates, sources, images and details. It acknowledges challenges given platforms often promote engaging content that confirms biases. Search engines and Facebook are working on solutions but their algorithms remain imperfect and sometimes promote false stories.
Fake news: Identifying, debunking and discussing false narratives with learnersLearningandTeaching
Fake news. It was the 2017 word of the year, but how is it understood by the student of today?
Students today are often heavily engaged in the online community, moving in social spheres that may be foreign to their teachers. With studies revealing that 48% of Australians now use social media as a news source, it is increasingly important for educators to understand how their students are engaging with online content and communities. As educators, we must equip ourselves with the tools and skillsets needed to debunk false, misleading and biased content and to show our students how to do the same.
In these slides, Alyce Hogg introduces the drivers of fake news, from online communities like ‘Reddit’ and ‘4chan’, to bots and content mills. Alyce also provides strategies and resources for identifying and debunking fake news, and suggests approaches for discussing fake news with students.
Searching and Evaluating the Web (General)stonca01
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses elements that indicate a website is a quality resource, such as the authority and qualifications of the author, the purpose and maintenance of the site, and whether the content is factual and objective. Good elements include .edu and .gov URLs, clear authorship by experts, and frequent updates. The document encourages students to consider these criteria when selecting a website for a class assignment and posting their finding in a discussion board. It aims to help students distinguish high-quality sources online.
This document summarizes Rob Ennals' work on developing a "Dispute Finder" tool to help users identify when information they encounter online is disputed by other credible sources. The tool includes a browser extension that highlights disputed claims on web pages, and links to sources supporting or opposing the claim. It also mines the web for patterns indicating disputed claims and labels the claims through crowdsourcing. Key challenges discussed include filtering ambiguous claims, scaling entailment detection, and determining what should count as a disputed claim. User studies found people were frustrated by a low number of highlighted claims and confused about how specific claims should be.
This document discusses issues related to children and youth's use of technology and social media. It provides statistics on how much time youth spend online and what activities they engage in. It also discusses privacy and safety concerns like oversharing personal information, cyberbullying, and exposure to inappropriate content. The document advocates teaching digital literacy and citizenship skills to help youth navigate these challenges and harness the benefits of technology.
This document discusses the permanence and visibility of children's digital footprints online. It notes that many children have computers in their bedrooms and spend 2-3 hours per day online. However, 41% of children ages 8 to 17 include personal information like email addresses and phone numbers in visible social media profiles. The document warns that anything posted online can create a "digital tattoo" that is highly visible and hard to remove.
This document outlines an instruction session presented by Laksamee Putnam on evaluating online resources. It discusses using the CRAP test to assess currency, reliability, authority and purpose/point of view. Students learn to develop effective keywords for their research topics and search for relevant websites using those keywords in Google and the library's guide to the web. The session concludes with students assessing their found resources and completing a worksheet.
This document discusses S.P.I.D.E.R., a method for evaluating the validity and reliability of websites. S.P.I.D.E.R. stands for Source, Purpose, Information, Domain, Educational value, and Reliability. It provides guidelines for analyzing the source and author of a website, the purpose and potential biases, the relevance and currency of information, implications of the domain extension, depth and quality of content, and whether the same information can be found on other reliable sites. The document also warns that search engine rankings do not guarantee a site's validity and that Wikipedia should be used cautiously as a source for school projects.
This document provides information on identifying and avoiding fake news. It discusses that distinguishing real from fake news is an important skill, and the objective is to help readers better identify fake news and avoid using those sources for scholarly research. It then provides tips on spotting fake news such as checking the author and source credibility, verifying images are being used correctly in context, and using fact-checking websites and browser extensions. Questionable aspects of news stories are outlined, such as sensationalized headlines, lack of multiple sources reporting on the story, and stories designed to appeal more to emotions than facts.
This document provides tips on using social media to promote yourself professionally. It notes that social media use is widespread, especially among younger generations. Traditional media like newspapers are declining. The document encourages establishing an online presence on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and blogs. It stresses maintaining an active, positive online profile to showcase expertise and personality. Having a strong online reputation through social media can help with job searching and business development. Privacy settings should be used carefully on more personal sites like Facebook.
Doug Caruso, assistant metro editor at The Columbus Dispatch, prepared this presentation on producing data-driven enterprise stories off your beat for Columbus, Ohio, NewsTrain on Oct. 21, 2017. It is accompanied by a handout of the same title. NewsTrain is a training initiative of Associated Press Media Editors (APME). More info: http://bit.ly/NewsTrain
1) Adults were generally able to competently search the internet to answer questions, though some were frustrated by large amounts of irrelevant information. They tended to choose websites that were .edu or .gov and had visual elements like pictures.
2) The survey asked adults questions about internet usage and had them search for active volcanoes. Most used Google and found the most active volcano in the US. They slightly favored less credible websites that had more visuals.
3) Using this inquiry with students would require simplifying searches and teaching credible research skills and plagiarism avoidance. Students may have more difficulty but it could help them learn benchmark internet skills.
The document provides an overview of social media best practices based on the author's experience. It recommends starting by participating in social media communities to learn, then thinking through goals and policies before picking appropriate tools. Key steps include measuring metrics before and after campaigns, listening and engaging during campaigns, and identifying lessons learned to improve future efforts. The overall message is that social media is about building relationships and having conversations, not just broadcasting messages.
The document provides information for parents on internet safety. It discusses federal laws like COPPA that protect children's privacy online. It emphasizes that the best protection is open communication between parents and children, and monitoring children's computer use. It also provides resources on internet safety organizations, understanding technology trends and language, researching sex offenders locally, and dealing with cyberbullying issues.
The document discusses social networking sites like Facebook and LinkedIn. It provides information on the history and popularity of Facebook, founded by Mark Zuckerberg. Benefits of social networking include staying connected with friends and family, sharing photos and news, and building professional networks. However, excessive time spent online and oversharing personal information can have downsides. The document recommends managing your online profile carefully and using LinkedIn for professional networking opportunities.
This SIDLIT 2019 roundtable discussion focused on strategies for verifying and counteracting media bias, fake news, and the various forms of half-truths that are becoming ubiquitous in our national dialog. The discussion will include examples of media bias and alternative facts as well as positive steps that educators and technologists can take to encourage critical thinking as opposed to blind acceptance of news from the plethora of sources now available.
This document outlines the requirements for a mini project on a company's profile, including sections on the company, industry, human resources, marketing, production, and finance departments. Specifically, it provides 20+ data points to include for the company profile, such as name, address, year established, mission/vision. It also lists 14+ items to cover for the industry profile, like market structure, import/export details. Finally, it details 12+ topics to discuss for each of the functional departments within the company, including department structure, policies, processes, and performance.
This document appears to be lyrics for songs composed by Murad Camarad Wysinger and other artists listed. The lyrics discuss themes of spirituality, struggle, and defending oneself from enemies. They portray the artists as strong figures navigating challenges while maintaining faith. Refrains praise having a partner and refer to seeking rewards in the afterlife. The lyrics contain numerous references to criminal behavior but overall seem to portray a message of persevering despite obstacles.
Red Wine announces a series of presentation masterclasses led by actor and trainer Michael Heath. The half-day classes will provide techniques for effective public speaking, including lecturing, presentations, interviews, and discussion leading. Michael has over 30 years of experience in theatre, film, and television and has previously trained executives at major companies. Testimonials praise his unique approach for moving presentations from good to great. Spots are limited and early booking is advised for the sessions aimed at both experienced speakers and novices.
Indie music has a similar melodic sound influenced by other indie bands, using simple but well-textured instruments. It has a layered, different sound produced by bands rather than individuals. Indie music has a different style from mainstream pop music as it isn't as widely heard or played. Common themes in indie music include bands producing acoustic music without heavy editing, and young artists putting their own style into the music to make it independent.
The document divides students into groups and instructs them to log into Moodle to complete an activity on editing techniques. It asks students to analyze how scriptwriters have planned for filming and editing in sample scripts. Students then discuss editing techniques they could use in their own films and how to evidence these techniques in their scripts. Finally, students are tasked with writing their scripts using proper format and including editing techniques based on what they've learned, with the goal of achieving one of the learning outcomes on their target post-it notes.
The document discusses three main theories of audience:
1) The Effects Model/Hypodermic Model which sees audiences as passive and easily influenced by media texts.
2) The Uses and Gratifications Model which views audiences as active and using media texts to fulfill personal needs and gratifications.
3) Reception Theory which examines how audiences can decode meanings in texts in dominant, negotiated, or oppositional ways based on their own views.
This document discusses various influences on the thriller being created. It summarizes key elements and tones from Luther, I Am Number 4, Sicario, Orphan Black, and Limitless that inspired aspects of the thriller, including:
- Luther's character style and portrayal of a near-genius detective
- I Am Number 4's concept of teenagers being hunted with special abilities
- Sicario's dark and tense tone to keep audiences on edge
- Orphan Black's concept of altering DNA and genetic enhancements
- Limitless and I Am Number 4's portrayal of grounded superhuman abilities in protagonists.
1) The document appears to be a song or poem that discusses rising up and increasing in wisdom and numbers.
2) It references black, Egyptian, and Aztec gods or figures and encourages rising up for black sisters, brothers, fathers, and mothers.
3) The last part discusses biblical passages about Adam and Eve being given dominion over the earth and sea by God, and staying wise and connected to infinity.
This document contains song lyrics written by Murad Camarad Wysinger and other artists. The lyrics discuss spirituality, avoiding conflict, rising above challenges, and not trusting the devil. They contain references to Aztec and Mayan culture as well as spiritual concepts like Amen-Ra and 2012. The lyrics are divided into sections for different songs.
kelebihan dan kekurangan dari media sosialmeisyahaulia
Twitter memiliki batasan karakter tweet yang pendek dan banyak simbol yang harus diingat penggunanya. Google Plus kurang populer dan penggunanya berkurang. Facebook sering mengubah tampilan. Instagram hanya memungkinkan video pendek dan foto kecil. Youtube memiliki konten yang tidak berguna atau pornografi yang diunggah secara bebas.
Amazon was founded by Jeff Bezos in 1995 and started as an online bookstore, allowing users to search and review texts. It has since diversified into various product lines and marketplaces, including third-party seller platforms. Amazon leverages its technological expertise in retail and customer data to provide a fast, inexpensive shopping experience online. It has transitioned from an innovative retailer to a broad-based web services supplier.
The document discusses various theories and perspectives related to gender representation in music videos. It describes how women are often hyper-sexualized in music videos and positioned for the male gaze. However, some female artists challenge stereotypes by being rarely sexualized and offering empowering lyrics. The document also discusses hegemonic masculinity in music, referring to competitive tendencies among males to dominate others and subordinate females, exhibiting traits like aggression and misogyny. It questions whether these aspects of hegemonic masculinity are still prevalent in contemporary music genres.
The document discusses three photographers - David Lazar, Steve McCurry, and Mario Testino. David Lazar is a travel photographer from Australia who captures moments of life and culture, especially through portrait and landscape photography. Steve McCurry specializes in photography from India and Southeast Asia, known for rich color prints showing small daily life moments. Mario Testino is a famous fashion photographer from Peru whose work has appeared in magazines like Vogue. He is known for photographs of Princess Diana and elevating Gisele Bundchen's career.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
This document summarizes a new methodology called EUReqA (Evolutionary Use Case driven Requirement Engineering Approach) for gathering requirements for large software development projects. The methodology uses an iterative, collaborative process involving stakeholders to build consensus on requirements at increasing levels of granularity. It was successfully used on a project to develop an integrated transportation management system. The benefits included maintaining project scope and schedule while ensuring user acceptance of the final system.
This document summarizes conventions and characteristics of different music genres in music videos:
- Electronic rock videos use darker colors and focus on band performances to represent the genre's grittier sound. Lighting focuses on singers and backgrounds are dark.
- Pop videos often use close-ups and shots that focus on the artist's emotions and set the scene. Artists are usually the main character surrounded by other characters.
- Country videos have natural lighting and settings like Texas that portray happy, relatable themes based on life experiences. Narratives provide empirical storylines.
- Rap videos feature artists rapping and expressing themselves directly to the camera in different locations using various camera angles and shots. Lyrics have deep meanings.
Pop Box LLC provides a convenient and healthy microwave popcorn option called Pop'Box. Pop'Box popcorn comes in three flavors - French Sea Salt, Big Screen Butter, and Love Me Sweet kettle corn. It has a higher fiber content and more antioxidants than other snack foods. Pop'Box is also safer and higher quality than traditional popcorn bags, using real sugar, PFOA-free materials, and allowing steam and heat to vent for a non-burning experience. The popcorn is crunchy with less oil. Pop Box aims to provide a movie theater popcorn experience you can enjoy at home in an environmentally friendly and biodegradable package.
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It recommends asking questions about the author's expertise, potential biases, use of evidence, and publication venue. Credible sources include well-established websites from experts in the field, as well as mainstream news sites. Government and educational websites ending in .gov and .edu require additional scrutiny. Fact-checking sites can help verify questionable information. Overall, critical evaluation of sources is important to determine what can reasonably be considered factual.
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It discusses how information can spread quickly online before being verified. Readers are encouraged to scrutinize sources by considering whether the author is an expert, has an agenda, and cites evidence. Search engines like SweetSearch that curate reliable sources are recommended. The conclusion emphasizes that credible ideas will be supported by many trustworthy sources and the scientific process rather than just emotion or a single perspective.
The document discusses determining the credibility of sources when conducting research online. It provides tips for evaluating sources such as checking if the author is a recognized expert, if multiple sources confirm the information, and if the source has biases. The document also recommends specialized search engines like SweetSearch and FindingDulcinea that curate reliable newspaper articles. Certain domains like .edu, .gov and websites from reputable organizations can also be more trustworthy sources of information. Students are advised to exercise critical thinking and verify facts from multiple credible sources.
The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential deception from websites, blogs, and wikis and emphasizes the need to approach online information with care and scrutiny.
Information & Intent: Optimizing Content and the User Search ExperienceJonathan Mendez
The document discusses how the abundance of information available online demands more efficient allocation of users' limited attention. It emphasizes optimizing content discovery, relevance, and engagement through understanding users' goals and intelligently changing content. Key aspects are determining relevance through testing, targeting delivery based on relevance, and using social media links and personalization to increase engagement over time through reinforcement of users' goals.
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It discusses how the internet has changed research and that not all online information is accurate. It then outlines five criteria for evaluating websites: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. The document explains each of these criteria in detail and provides examples to illustrate how to apply them when assessing the reliability of information on a given website. The overall message is that students need to carefully evaluate websites using these standards to determine their value for research.
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It begins by explaining that unlike printed materials, websites are not edited and fact checked, so not all information online is useful or accurate. It then outlines criteria to consider when evaluating websites, including authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Specific questions are provided for each criteria. The document emphasizes that no single criteria determines a website's value and that the criteria should be considered together. Students are assigned an exercise to practice evaluating websites using the outlined criteria.
This presentation outlines 10 steps for better web research skills: 1) Consider where to search beyond just search engines 2) Try multiple search engines 3) Dig deeper than the first page of results 4) Think about your topic before searching 5) Use search operators to refine results 6) Question the reliability of information 7) Find primary sources when possible 8) Check the author and publisher's credibility 9) Consider the reason an article was written 10) Verify critical information with multiple sources. The goal is to teach students to thoughtfully evaluate online information rather than passively accepting search results.
NCompass Live - Oct. 24, 2018
http://nlc.nebraska.gov/ncompasslive/
With the proliferation of fake (or, at least, dubious) news, students need to know the strategies necessary to be a good consumer of information. This involves fine-tuning their critical thinking skills and using prior knowledge when determining the validity of research information. This presentation will give school librarians ideas and information they can incorporate in their information literacy curriculum.
Presenter: Judy Henning, Assistant Professor - School Library Program, University of Nebraska at Kearney.
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptxSherlyMaeNeri
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability and credibility of information sources. It discusses five key factors to consider: currency, accuracy, authority, relevance, and purpose. Currency refers to how up-to-date the information is. Accuracy means the information is supported by facts and evidence. Authority is the credentials and expertise of the author. Relevance is how closely the information relates to the topic. Purpose considers why the source was created and potential biases. Students are encouraged to think critically about sources by investigating these factors.
The document discusses the importance of political literacy in today's information environment. It defines political literacy as the ability to understand how government works, important issues facing society, and think critically about different points of view. However, with the amount of information available, it can be difficult for citizens to separate facts from opinions and determine what sources to trust. The document argues that librarians have an important role to play in helping people develop political literacy skills through curating quality information sources and teaching media literacy. It provides several resources for fact-checking news and developing political literacy.
This document provides tips for evaluating information found on the web. It discusses that the quality of websites varies greatly as the web is uncontrolled. It suggests evaluating websites based on factors like author credentials, date of publication, potential biases, accuracy and purpose. Recommended sources include subject directories, search engines like Google which can be refined, and .gov, .edu sites which are usually reliable. The document stresses the importance of fact checking online information against books and articles verified by experts.
Short presentation on evaluating web sources created for a job interview at George Mason University. George Mason University is not responsible for any of the content of this presentation.
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency means how recently information/links were updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Librarians can also assist with difficult-to-evaluate sites.
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency evaluates how recently the site was updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Considering the criteria together provides a holistic evaluation of a website's reliability and usefulness.
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It discusses that unlike printed materials, websites are not edited and information online is not always accurate. It then outlines criteria to evaluate websites, including authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. The document explains each criterion in detail and provides examples and questions to consider for each one. The overall message is that students should carefully analyze websites using these criteria before determining their value for research.
This document provides information for a lesson plan titled "Become an Online Sleuth". The lesson teaches students how to evaluate the credibility of online content by identifying guidelines for what makes a website trustworthy or not. It involves students watching a video about evaluation criteria, discussing factors that indicate a site is reputable, and having students practice analyzing websites. The lesson aims to help students understand that just because something is online does not automatically make it true, and to learn skills for determining which sources they can trust online.
This document provides an overview of news literacy in the information age. It discusses the advantages and disadvantages of finding information online, how to identify reliable sources, and how to minimize disadvantages. Key points include: the growth of internet usage, top news sites, information overload online, challenges like inaccurate information and blurred lines between news and opinion, and how to evaluate websites based on factors like date of content, citations, independence, and transparency of authorship. The document emphasizes that popularity and speed do not guarantee reliability and provides tips for fact checking information found online.
Savvy Shoppers: Web Evalutation for Middle School StudentsMargaret D. Keys
I did a presentation to all of the sixth, seventh, and eight grade students at a local middle school in 2013. This PowerPoint contains activities and sites. Please feel free to download and adapt for your own use, just giving me credit for being your source.
<a><img src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png" /></a><br /><span>Savvy Shoppers</span> by <span>Margaret D. Keys</span> is licensed under a <a>Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License</a>.
The document discusses the importance of free public libraries and universal education in a democratic society. It outlines the "CRAP test" method for evaluating the reliability and credibility of information sources. The CRAP test involves checking the currency, relevance, authority, and purpose of information. It emphasizes the need for citizens to be discerning consumers and creators of news in the digital age. Resources for fact-checking information are also provided.
Similar to Amarillo College Creery TLC Library Instruction PowerPoint Fall 2015 (20)
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptxKavitha Krishnan
In an education system, it is understood that assessment is only for the students, but on the other hand, the Assessment of teachers is also an important aspect of the education system that ensures teachers are providing high-quality instruction to students. The assessment process can be used to provide feedback and support for professional development, to inform decisions about teacher retention or promotion, or to evaluate teacher effectiveness for accountability purposes.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
3. Why do students need information literacy?
Information literacy is the ability to perform these tasks:
• To identify what information is needed.
• To understand how information sources are organized.
• To identify the best sources of information for a particular need.
• To locate those sources.
• To use the information ethically, e.g., citing sources accurately.
• To evaluate the sources critically.
• To share that information.
Source: University of Idaho Information Literacy Portal (adapted)
4. Why do citizens need information literacy?
Citizens must constantly make important decisions in all areas of life:
College
Places to live
Careers
Retirement
Taxes
Etc., etc., etc.
Purchases
Voting
Medical issues
Parenting
Finances
Buying a home
When you have to make an important decision, where will you look?
6. Does the Web site look serious?
• What does the appearance
of the page tell you?
• Does it look professional
or amateurish?
• Is there advertising on the
page?
• What kind of advertising?
• How does it affect the
quality of the information?
7. Does the Web site look serious? (continued)
• What kind of tone does
the article have?
• Is it well-written?
• Are there paragraphs?
How’s the grammar and
spelling? Are there any
typos?
• Does the text make
sense?
Privacy is mostly an illusion. A useful illusion, no question about it, one
that allows us to live without being paralyzed by self-consciousness. The
illusion of privacy gives us room to be fully human, sharing intimacies and
risking mistakes. But all the while, the line between private and public
space is as porous as tissue paper. The adulterous couple sneaking off to a
hotel: Is someone following them? The teenagers skipping school to visit
the mall: Will they bump into a woman from Mom’s book club? The
solitary motorist thrashing an air guitar at a traffic light: Will the driver in
the next lane look over? Like children of a certain age who think closing
their eyes will make them invisible, we assume that no one sees or hears
our private moments, and we’re right—until someone watches or listens.
This was true long before the National Security Agency began collecting
our telephone and Internet records from technology and communications
companies, and long before the House of Representatives on July 24 gave
a fresh thumbs-up to further NSA collections by a narrow 12-vote margin,
217-205. It was true long before a military judge found Private Bradley
Manning guilty of espionage for his role in the WikiLeaks case—but
acquitted him on the charge of aiding the enemy—on July 30.
8. Does the Web site look serious? (continued)
• Busy and unattractive.
• No information on qualifications.
• No details on issue positions.
• No information on intentions.
• No mechanism for online donations.
• Attractive appearance. Good photo.
• “Why I’m running” featured.
• Link to learn more about him.
• Link to learn more about his position on issues.
• Links for contributions and volunteers.
9. Who wrote this?
• “Von Drehle received a B.A. from the
University of Denver and a Master of
Letters degree from Oxford. “
Time.com Web site.
• Editor-at-Large page on Time.com
site.
• Author page on MacMillan Publishers
Web site.
• Author page on Amazon.com.
• Author page on Goodreads.com.
• Is there an author?
• Does the author offer any
credentials?
• Is the author an expert or an
amateur?
• Is there a link or included
information about the author?
• Google the author.
• Google the author’s employer.
• Google awards author has won.
• Check Amazon.com.
10. Who is the sponsor of this Web site?
• Does a particular organization
provide the Web site where the article
was posted?
• Is the sponsor of the site a reputable
organization or a special-interest
group that has an obvious bias? How
do you know?
• Is there a link or included information
about the sponsoring organization?
• Does the organization provide a
mission statement?
• Read “About us” or similar section.
What do they say about themselves? What do others say about them?
11. Who is the sponsor of this Web site? (continued)
Top-Level Domains
edu = U.S. post-secondary educational institutions accredited by an agency on the U.S.
Department of Education's list of Nationally Recognized Accrediting Agencies.
A tilde symbol ( ~ ) in the URL indicates that page is that of an individual.
http://www.actx.edu/~jkcomerford
gov = Government institutions
mil = Military
tx.edu or texas.gov = Texas state government institutions
org = Generic
net = Generic
com = Commercial
12. Who is the sponsor of this Web site? (continued)
Countries:
United Kingdom = uk Example: www.parliament.uk
Canada = ca
Australia = au
New Zealand = nz
Germany = de
Photo source: https://emmer.house.gov/issues/foreign-affairs
13. When was the information written?
• Is there a publication date or
copyright date or last updated date
at the beginning or end of the
article?
• If there’s no date on the article, is
there a date on the site’s home
page?
• If there’s no date on the article or
site home page, can you verify how
current the site is from the text or
topic of the article?
Page 1
Page 4
14. Why was this Web site published?
• As a public service? To educate? As
entertainment? To sell something? To
convince you of something?
• Is the information biased? Is this a bad
thing?
16. Choose Web sites for research wisely.
Web sites to AVOID for serious research:
• Wikipedia et al.
• About.com et al.
• eHOW
• Personal blogs
• Forums
• Satirical sites
17. “Limiting our ideas
solely to those that
are easily found online
does little to advance
our abilities to create
knowledge from
information. In this way, tools like
Google may be making us dumber.”
Dr. Ryan Watkins
George Washington University
Public
Search
Engines
Section 3
22. Google Scholar
Problems:
• Old information
• Lack of full text
• Limited coverage
• Payment sometimes required. Don’t pay for articles!
23. Are you saying I shouldn’t use Google?
Pros:
• Often good resource
for informal research
or simple look-ups
• Easy to use
• Fast results
• Natural Language
• Free
Cons:
• Information overload
• Users determine ranking.
• Few full-text academic resources
• Advertisements
The answer is,
“It depends.”
25. Plan your search. Think carefully.
Step 1: Write your topic as a statement or a question.
Should employers have the right to monitor employees’ email?
Step 2: Identify the main ideas of your topic. Keep it simple.
Should employers have the right to monitor employees’ email?
Step 3: Think of synonyms or other words you could use for the same topic.
Employers – Bosses, supervisors, workplace, “big brother”
Employees – Workers, subordinates, staff
Email – ?
Implied – Privacy, rights, monitor
Don’t forget to enclose phrases in quotation marks!
26. Using the Boolean connector “or” in Google.
employer OR supervisor OR boss employee OR subordinate OR
worker email
• 9 Ways Your Employer Can Legally Spy On You
• Workforce Surveillance: Is Your Boss Keeping a Private Eye on You?
• Should Companies Monitor Their Employees' Social Media?
• With Nowhere to Hide: Workers are Scrambling for Privacy
• Monitoring Employee E-Mail and Internet Usage
• Your Boss Is Watching | PCWorld
• Do employers have a right to spy on workers?
27. • Keep in mind that you are not talking to a person.
• Too wordy. Every search term you include reduces the number of articles
that will meet your requirements.
• Users should identify the main concepts and use them as search terms.
• Sometimes search terms are implied and don’t have to be included.
Doesn’t “surveillance” imply humanity?
• Search with just “surveillance” in addition to searching for “surveillance
society.”
Would this be an effective search?
28. Green, Joshua. “The Rove Presidency.” The Atlantic.com. Atlantic
Monthly Group, Sept. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
Quade, Alex. “Elite Team Rescues Troops behind Enemy Lines.”
CNN.com. Cable News Network, 19 Mar. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
“The Scientists Speak.” Editorial. New York Times. New York Times, 20
Nov. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
MLA examples – Author/No author
29. Green, Joshua. “The Rove Presidency.” The Atlantic.com. Atlantic
Monthly Group, Sept. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
Quade, Alex. “Elite Team Rescues Troops behind Enemy Lines.”
CNN.com. Cable News Network, 19 Mar. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
“The Scientists Speak.” Editorial. New York Times. New York Times, 20
Nov. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
MLA examples – Editorial/Article title
30. Green, Joshua. “The Rove Presidency.” The Atlantic.com. Atlantic
Monthly Group, Sept. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
Quade, Alex. “Elite Team Rescues Troops behind Enemy Lines.”
CNN.com. Cable News Network, 19 Mar. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
“The Scientists Speak.” Editorial. New York Times. New York Times, 20
Nov. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
MLA examples – Name of Web site
31. Green, Joshua. “The Rove Presidency.” The Atlantic.com. Atlantic
Monthly Group, Sept. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
Quade, Alex. “Elite Team Rescues Troops behind Enemy Lines.”
CNN.com. Cable News Network, 19 Mar. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
“The Scientists Speak.” Editorial. New York Times. New York Times, 20
Nov. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
MLA examples – Sponsor
32. Green, Joshua. “The Rove Presidency.” The Atlantic.com. Atlantic
Monthly Group, Sept. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
Quade, Alex. “Elite Team Rescues Troops behind Enemy Lines.”
CNN.com. Cable News Network, 19 Mar. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
“The Scientists Speak.” Editorial. New York Times. New York Times, 20
Nov. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
MLA examples – Publication date
33. Green, Joshua. “The Rove Presidency.” The Atlantic.com. Atlantic
Monthly Group, Sept. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
Quade, Alex. “Elite Team Rescues Troops behind Enemy Lines.”
CNN.com. Cable News Network, 19 Mar. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
“The Scientists Speak.” Editorial. New York Times. New York Times, 20
Nov. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
MLA examples – Medium
34. Green, Joshua. “The Rove Presidency.” The Atlantic.com. Atlantic
Monthly Group, Sept. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
Quade, Alex. “Elite Team Rescues Troops behind Enemy Lines.”
CNN.com. Cable News Network, 19 Mar. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
“The Scientists Speak.” Editorial. New York Times. New York Times, 20
Nov. 2007. Web. 15 May 2008.
MLA examples – Retrieval date
Are there dates on the page to indicate when the page was written, when the page was first placed on the Web, or when the page was last revised?
Overall value
Subject matter
5 year rule