13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•240 views
The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential deception from websites, blogs, and wikis and emphasizes the need to approach online information with care and scrutiny.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![The World Wide Web ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Is my source credible?
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources for research. It defines a credible source as one that can be trusted, is agreed upon by other sources, is up-to-date, comes from a respected author or organization, provides clear information about the author/organization, and is not biased. It notes that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone so its accuracy cannot be guaranteed, while .edu, .org, and .gov websites tend to be more credible. It provides tips for evaluating sources like checking copyright dates, references, and professionalism of the website.
Information literacy
Information literacy is a set of skills that allow people to recognize when information is needed and to locate, evaluate, and effectively use that information. These skills are important for students to develop so they can validate information from the internet. The document provides tips for evaluating websites, such as checking the domain name and extension, looking at authorship and links, and examining the content. It directs readers to additional resources on information literacy.
Reliable resources powerpoint
This document discusses reliable and unreliable sources for research. Reliable sources include books, peer-reviewed journals and articles, dissertations, and websites ending in .edu or .gov as these are often from educational institutions or government agencies. Unreliable sources like Wikipedia can be used as a starting point but require confirmation from reliable sources, as the information may not be thoroughly vetted. Blogs, personal websites, and commercial websites with agendas are also generally unreliable. The document provides guidelines for evaluating source reliability based on author credentials, evidence used, and potential biases.
Source Credibility
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources. It provides signs that a source is or isn't credible, including if it is written by an expert, peer-reviewed, published by a reputable organization, has transparency around authorship and purpose, and isn't outdated. It also examines domains like .edu, .gov and .org to provide clues about the publisher and discusses evaluating Wikipedia articles for credibility based on editing policies and quality indicators. The overall message is to carefully examine sources using these criteria before relying on the information.
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part I
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part IOffice of Instructional Development at Dawson College
This document provides an overview of applying new technologies in education with a hands-on approach. It discusses key concepts related to the internet, World Wide Web 1.0 and 2.0, evaluating online resources, using tools like Google Maps, and sharing information through services such as Google Docs, Flickr, YouTube, and Dropbox. The document is intended to be covered over two sessions on January 14th and February 4th that will allow participants to gain experience using these technologies in a classroom setting.Amarillo College Creery TLC Library Instruction PowerPoint Fall 2015
This PowerPoint was created for the Fall 2015 TLC Class taught by Luci Creery. Creator: Jana Comerford, Amarillo College Library
Searchthewebtutorial2014
This document provides tips for evaluating information found on the web. It discusses that the quality of websites varies greatly as the web is uncontrolled. It suggests evaluating websites based on factors like author credentials, date of publication, potential biases, accuracy and purpose. Recommended sources include subject directories, search engines like Google which can be refined, and .gov, .edu sites which are usually reliable. The document stresses the importance of fact checking online information against books and articles verified by experts.
Finding credible sources
The document discusses finding credible sources for research. It emphasizes that using multiple perspectives from a variety of reliable sources helps develop a well-rounded argument. Primary sources are original works, while secondary sources analyze or discuss primary sources. The document cautions against solely using Google, Wikipedia, or top search results, as these may not always be trustworthy. It provides tips for evaluating websites like checking the author's credentials, date of publication, and presence of biases. Databases through the school are presented as a better option than open web searches, as they only contain vetted, credible sources.
Recommended
Is my source credible?
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources for research. It defines a credible source as one that can be trusted, is agreed upon by other sources, is up-to-date, comes from a respected author or organization, provides clear information about the author/organization, and is not biased. It notes that Wikipedia can be edited by anyone so its accuracy cannot be guaranteed, while .edu, .org, and .gov websites tend to be more credible. It provides tips for evaluating sources like checking copyright dates, references, and professionalism of the website.
Information literacy
Information literacy is a set of skills that allow people to recognize when information is needed and to locate, evaluate, and effectively use that information. These skills are important for students to develop so they can validate information from the internet. The document provides tips for evaluating websites, such as checking the domain name and extension, looking at authorship and links, and examining the content. It directs readers to additional resources on information literacy.
Reliable resources powerpoint
This document discusses reliable and unreliable sources for research. Reliable sources include books, peer-reviewed journals and articles, dissertations, and websites ending in .edu or .gov as these are often from educational institutions or government agencies. Unreliable sources like Wikipedia can be used as a starting point but require confirmation from reliable sources, as the information may not be thoroughly vetted. Blogs, personal websites, and commercial websites with agendas are also generally unreliable. The document provides guidelines for evaluating source reliability based on author credentials, evidence used, and potential biases.
Source Credibility
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of sources. It provides signs that a source is or isn't credible, including if it is written by an expert, peer-reviewed, published by a reputable organization, has transparency around authorship and purpose, and isn't outdated. It also examines domains like .edu, .gov and .org to provide clues about the publisher and discusses evaluating Wikipedia articles for credibility based on editing policies and quality indicators. The overall message is to carefully examine sources using these criteria before relying on the information.
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part I
Applying New Technologies in Education: A Hands-On Approach: Part IOffice of Instructional Development at Dawson College
This document provides an overview of applying new technologies in education with a hands-on approach. It discusses key concepts related to the internet, World Wide Web 1.0 and 2.0, evaluating online resources, using tools like Google Maps, and sharing information through services such as Google Docs, Flickr, YouTube, and Dropbox. The document is intended to be covered over two sessions on January 14th and February 4th that will allow participants to gain experience using these technologies in a classroom setting.Amarillo College Creery TLC Library Instruction PowerPoint Fall 2015
This PowerPoint was created for the Fall 2015 TLC Class taught by Luci Creery. Creator: Jana Comerford, Amarillo College Library
Searchthewebtutorial2014
This document provides tips for evaluating information found on the web. It discusses that the quality of websites varies greatly as the web is uncontrolled. It suggests evaluating websites based on factors like author credentials, date of publication, potential biases, accuracy and purpose. Recommended sources include subject directories, search engines like Google which can be refined, and .gov, .edu sites which are usually reliable. The document stresses the importance of fact checking online information against books and articles verified by experts.
Finding credible sources
The document discusses finding credible sources for research. It emphasizes that using multiple perspectives from a variety of reliable sources helps develop a well-rounded argument. Primary sources are original works, while secondary sources analyze or discuss primary sources. The document cautions against solely using Google, Wikipedia, or top search results, as these may not always be trustworthy. It provides tips for evaluating websites like checking the author's credentials, date of publication, and presence of biases. Databases through the school are presented as a better option than open web searches, as they only contain vetted, credible sources.
FSU SLIS InfoSvcs Wk 3 - Web Search & Evaluation
The document discusses evaluating online sources and provides examples of search techniques using Google and Bing to find information on topics like Martin Luther King Jr. and conversions between measurements. It also covers evaluating the credibility of websites and using subject specific search engines or limiting searches to particular domains or file types.
Assessing websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, clues are provided on aspects to examine, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, determining when the information was published, and understanding the intended audience and purpose of the content. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and relevance for research.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Additional tips include checking URLs for clues about the domain, considering print and subscription sources, and evaluating blogs based on the author, content, comments, updates, and biases addressed. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than settling for those that are "good enough" and to keep in mind that source quality affects the evaluation of their own work.
Evaluating Websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for classroom use. It introduces the CRAAP test for critical evaluation, which considers currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. It discusses evaluating domains like .com, .org, and .edu. It also gives examples of determining a website's authority and accuracy through examining the author's credentials, publisher, citations, and more. The goal is to help teachers develop students' skills in critically analyzing online information sources.
Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research
This document discusses criteria for evaluating the trustworthiness and reliability of information found on websites:
Credibility refers to the qualifications and trustworthiness of the source of the information. Accuracy means the information is consistent with other reliable sources and not obviously false. Bias/objectivity examines whether all viewpoints are represented or if the purpose is to entertain, persuade, or inform. Timeliness considers how recently the information was published and whether outdated information would impact its usefulness. Relevance evaluates whether the information is appropriate for the intended audience and topic.
Finding Credible Web Sources
The document provides tips for finding credible web resources. It recommends using academic databases that contain peer-reviewed articles, as these have been examined by experts before publication. It distinguishes between primary and secondary sources, noting primary sources are original documents while secondary sources analyze or respond to primary sources. The document also notes that the domain name (e.g. .edu, .gov) can indicate the credibility of a website and that readers should be aware of potential biases.
Informationliteracy
The document provides information on evaluating the credibility of internet resources. It discusses several key factors to consider, including authority, currency, objectivity, accuracy, and appearance. Authority refers to the qualifications of the author or organization. Currency addresses how recently the content was updated. Objectivity means presenting multiple viewpoints without bias. Accuracy means the information can be verified elsewhere. Appearance considers design elements like ads, navigation, and accessibility. Examples are given of both reputable and questionable websites based on an analysis of these factors.
Credibility
This document discusses credibility and provides tips for finding credible information online. It defines credibility as having accuracy, coverage, objectivity, and an authoritative source. The document recommends two credible databases for biographical information, Biography.com from the Biography Channel and the Academy of Achievement. It notes that databases are trustworthy, organized, time-saving, and full of information. It also provides login credentials for the ABC Clio and Britannica Online databases.
Website Validity
This document discusses S.P.I.D.E.R., a method for evaluating the validity and reliability of websites. S.P.I.D.E.R. stands for Source, Purpose, Information, Domain, Educational value, and Reliability. It provides guidelines for analyzing the source and author of a website, the purpose and potential biases, the relevance and currency of information, implications of the domain extension, depth and quality of content, and whether the same information can be found on other reliable sites. The document also warns that search engine rankings do not guarantee a site's validity and that Wikipedia should be used cautiously as a source for school projects.
Searching the Internet
This document provides guidance for students on effectively searching the internet. It discusses preparing searches by making lists of relevant terms and excluding unwanted terms. Boolean operators like AND, OR, and NOT can be used to combine search terms. Students are advised to evaluate websites for accuracy, authority, and currency before using the information. Proper citation of internet sources is also covered, including examples of in-text citations and works cited entries. Overall, the document emphasizes the importance of planning searches in order to find high-quality information efficiently.
Research power point for students
This document provides guidance on effective internet searching strategies. It discusses defining your search topic, identifying appropriate search locations, developing effective search queries, and evaluating the credibility of sources. Key recommendations include planning your search offline first by identifying questions and keywords. When searching, consider specialized databases and directories instead of only major search engines. Techniques for evaluating sources include examining the URL, domain, author credentials, and date of publication. Sources should be cross-referenced from different credible locations.
Website Evaluation Presentation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and quality in order to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite for school assignments. It recommends using the Five W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - as a framework to analyze the author's credentials, purpose of site, date of publication, domain type, and sources cited. Students are reminded to consider more than one website and also use print resources, as the quality of sources impacts teachers' evaluation of student work. Being a careful evaluator is important for making informed decisions.
Website Evaluation
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, questions are provided to help assess different aspects, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, understanding biases present, and verifying facts through other sources. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and credibility for research.
Online Searching Tips
This document summarizes online searching tips presented by Mindy McAdams from the University of Florida. It discusses advanced search options on Google, evaluating the trustworthiness of websites, investigating website sources, top-level domains, open directories, the Wayback Machine, health information resources, blog searching, and using critical thinking to evaluate online information.
Evaluating websites edit
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for research purposes. It discusses looking at the credibility and authority of the author, accuracy and reliability of the information, date of publication, and sources cited. Some factors to consider include the purpose of the site, biases, and what the URL reveals about the domain and organization responsible for the site. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than just accepting sources at face value.
Wiki credibility
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of Wikipedia articles. It provides the CARS method for evaluation, which stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. Credibility can be evaluated by looking at whether articles have citations and were recently edited. Accuracy is suggested by recent edits and flags for articles needing improvement. Reasonableness is questioned if articles are flagged as biased. Support is indicated by other articles linking to it and viewing edit histories. Protected pages that require special permission to edit are also likely more credible.
Cruz s professional ethics student lesson powerpoint
This document outlines a lesson plan for teaching digital literacy and responsibility to students. It covers topics such as plagiarism, citations, copyright, privacy, and challenges to library materials. The teacher provides definitions and examples of these concepts, as well as lists online resources for students to reference. The goal is for students to properly utilize information from other sources in their schoolwork.
11 2 t4_chapter11powerpoint
The document discusses the power and importance of language. It explains that language can be used to describe, define concepts, and shape cultural norms. Descriptions, definitions, and acceptable language can vary based on context and culture. Language can also be used to mislead through ambiguity, loaded words, propaganda, and hate speech. However, language also has the power to transform society for good when used to inspire, uplift, and call people to action for positive change.
14b 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint
The document provides guidance on critically analyzing popular culture works through examining both their context and content. It emphasizes the importance of considering the context, such as the intended audience, socio-political climate, and any corporate or ideological influences. When assessing the content, it recommends analyzing elements like genre, plot, characters, narrative elements, and interpreting different levels of meaning. The tools outlined help readers develop a sophisticated understanding of popular culture.
Preachers of Grace, Witnesses to the Resurrection
A presentation on Mary Catherine Hilkert, OP's article
A course requirement on the Spirituality of the Preacher (2nd semester 2012-13)
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
The document discusses different types of logical relationships between categorical propositions:
1) Contraries are propositions that cannot both be true but could both be false, with one being necessarily false if the other is true.
2) Subcontraries are propositions that cannot both be false but could both be true, with one being necessarily true if the other is false.
3) Contradictories are propositions that cannot both be true or both be false.
It also discusses inferences that can be drawn between categorical propositions, including subalternation, obversion, conversion, and contraposition.
Prayer for Poverty, Chastity and Obedience
The document contains three prayers requesting different gifts from God. The first prayer asks for the gift of poverty and to reveal any excessive attachments that prevent a complete "Yes" to God. It asks to learn to rely on God's presence rather than material comforts. The second prayer asks for the gift of chastity and purity to strengthen the body, spirit and soul. The third prayer requests the gift of obedience to listen to God's will and live in obedience through contemplation and service.
More Related Content
What's hot
FSU SLIS InfoSvcs Wk 3 - Web Search & Evaluation
The document discusses evaluating online sources and provides examples of search techniques using Google and Bing to find information on topics like Martin Luther King Jr. and conversions between measurements. It also covers evaluating the credibility of websites and using subject specific search engines or limiting searches to particular domains or file types.
Assessing websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, clues are provided on aspects to examine, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, determining when the information was published, and understanding the intended audience and purpose of the content. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and relevance for research.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Additional tips include checking URLs for clues about the domain, considering print and subscription sources, and evaluating blogs based on the author, content, comments, updates, and biases addressed. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than settling for those that are "good enough" and to keep in mind that source quality affects the evaluation of their own work.
Evaluating Websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for classroom use. It introduces the CRAAP test for critical evaluation, which considers currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. It discusses evaluating domains like .com, .org, and .edu. It also gives examples of determining a website's authority and accuracy through examining the author's credentials, publisher, citations, and more. The goal is to help teachers develop students' skills in critically analyzing online information sources.
Web Site Evaluation, Cultural Research
This document discusses criteria for evaluating the trustworthiness and reliability of information found on websites:
Credibility refers to the qualifications and trustworthiness of the source of the information. Accuracy means the information is consistent with other reliable sources and not obviously false. Bias/objectivity examines whether all viewpoints are represented or if the purpose is to entertain, persuade, or inform. Timeliness considers how recently the information was published and whether outdated information would impact its usefulness. Relevance evaluates whether the information is appropriate for the intended audience and topic.
Finding Credible Web Sources
The document provides tips for finding credible web resources. It recommends using academic databases that contain peer-reviewed articles, as these have been examined by experts before publication. It distinguishes between primary and secondary sources, noting primary sources are original documents while secondary sources analyze or respond to primary sources. The document also notes that the domain name (e.g. .edu, .gov) can indicate the credibility of a website and that readers should be aware of potential biases.
Informationliteracy
The document provides information on evaluating the credibility of internet resources. It discusses several key factors to consider, including authority, currency, objectivity, accuracy, and appearance. Authority refers to the qualifications of the author or organization. Currency addresses how recently the content was updated. Objectivity means presenting multiple viewpoints without bias. Accuracy means the information can be verified elsewhere. Appearance considers design elements like ads, navigation, and accessibility. Examples are given of both reputable and questionable websites based on an analysis of these factors.
Credibility
This document discusses credibility and provides tips for finding credible information online. It defines credibility as having accuracy, coverage, objectivity, and an authoritative source. The document recommends two credible databases for biographical information, Biography.com from the Biography Channel and the Academy of Achievement. It notes that databases are trustworthy, organized, time-saving, and full of information. It also provides login credentials for the ABC Clio and Britannica Online databases.
Website Validity
This document discusses S.P.I.D.E.R., a method for evaluating the validity and reliability of websites. S.P.I.D.E.R. stands for Source, Purpose, Information, Domain, Educational value, and Reliability. It provides guidelines for analyzing the source and author of a website, the purpose and potential biases, the relevance and currency of information, implications of the domain extension, depth and quality of content, and whether the same information can be found on other reliable sites. The document also warns that search engine rankings do not guarantee a site's validity and that Wikipedia should be used cautiously as a source for school projects.
Searching the Internet
This document provides guidance for students on effectively searching the internet. It discusses preparing searches by making lists of relevant terms and excluding unwanted terms. Boolean operators like AND, OR, and NOT can be used to combine search terms. Students are advised to evaluate websites for accuracy, authority, and currency before using the information. Proper citation of internet sources is also covered, including examples of in-text citations and works cited entries. Overall, the document emphasizes the importance of planning searches in order to find high-quality information efficiently.
Research power point for students
This document provides guidance on effective internet searching strategies. It discusses defining your search topic, identifying appropriate search locations, developing effective search queries, and evaluating the credibility of sources. Key recommendations include planning your search offline first by identifying questions and keywords. When searching, consider specialized databases and directories instead of only major search engines. Techniques for evaluating sources include examining the URL, domain, author credentials, and date of publication. Sources should be cross-referenced from different credible locations.
Website Evaluation Presentation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and quality in order to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite for school assignments. It recommends using the Five W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - as a framework to analyze the author's credentials, purpose of site, date of publication, domain type, and sources cited. Students are reminded to consider more than one website and also use print resources, as the quality of sources impacts teachers' evaluation of student work. Being a careful evaluator is important for making informed decisions.
Website Evaluation
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, questions are provided to help assess different aspects, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, understanding biases present, and verifying facts through other sources. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and credibility for research.
Online Searching Tips
This document summarizes online searching tips presented by Mindy McAdams from the University of Florida. It discusses advanced search options on Google, evaluating the trustworthiness of websites, investigating website sources, top-level domains, open directories, the Wayback Machine, health information resources, blog searching, and using critical thinking to evaluate online information.
Evaluating websites edit
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for research purposes. It discusses looking at the credibility and authority of the author, accuracy and reliability of the information, date of publication, and sources cited. Some factors to consider include the purpose of the site, biases, and what the URL reveals about the domain and organization responsible for the site. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than just accepting sources at face value.
Wiki credibility
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of Wikipedia articles. It provides the CARS method for evaluation, which stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. Credibility can be evaluated by looking at whether articles have citations and were recently edited. Accuracy is suggested by recent edits and flags for articles needing improvement. Reasonableness is questioned if articles are flagged as biased. Support is indicated by other articles linking to it and viewing edit histories. Protected pages that require special permission to edit are also likely more credible.
Cruz s professional ethics student lesson powerpoint
This document outlines a lesson plan for teaching digital literacy and responsibility to students. It covers topics such as plagiarism, citations, copyright, privacy, and challenges to library materials. The teacher provides definitions and examples of these concepts, as well as lists online resources for students to reference. The goal is for students to properly utilize information from other sources in their schoolwork.
What's hot (17)
Cruz s professional ethics student lesson powerpoint
Cruz s professional ethics student lesson powerpoint
Viewers also liked
11 2 t4_chapter11powerpoint
The document discusses the power and importance of language. It explains that language can be used to describe, define concepts, and shape cultural norms. Descriptions, definitions, and acceptable language can vary based on context and culture. Language can also be used to mislead through ambiguity, loaded words, propaganda, and hate speech. However, language also has the power to transform society for good when used to inspire, uplift, and call people to action for positive change.
14b 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint
The document provides guidance on critically analyzing popular culture works through examining both their context and content. It emphasizes the importance of considering the context, such as the intended audience, socio-political climate, and any corporate or ideological influences. When assessing the content, it recommends analyzing elements like genre, plot, characters, narrative elements, and interpreting different levels of meaning. The tools outlined help readers develop a sophisticated understanding of popular culture.
Preachers of Grace, Witnesses to the Resurrection
A presentation on Mary Catherine Hilkert, OP's article
A course requirement on the Spirituality of the Preacher (2nd semester 2012-13)
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
The document discusses different types of logical relationships between categorical propositions:
1) Contraries are propositions that cannot both be true but could both be false, with one being necessarily false if the other is true.
2) Subcontraries are propositions that cannot both be false but could both be true, with one being necessarily true if the other is false.
3) Contradictories are propositions that cannot both be true or both be false.
It also discusses inferences that can be drawn between categorical propositions, including subalternation, obversion, conversion, and contraposition.
Prayer for Poverty, Chastity and Obedience
The document contains three prayers requesting different gifts from God. The first prayer asks for the gift of poverty and to reveal any excessive attachments that prevent a complete "Yes" to God. It asks to learn to rely on God's presence rather than material comforts. The second prayer asks for the gift of chastity and purity to strengthen the body, spirit and soul. The third prayer requests the gift of obedience to listen to God's will and live in obedience through contemplation and service.
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
The document discusses different types of logical relationships between categorical propositions:
1) Contraries are propositions that cannot both be true but could both be false, with one being necessarily false if the other is true.
2) Subcontraries are propositions that cannot both be false but could both be true, with one being necessarily true if the other is false.
3) Contradictories are propositions that cannot both be true or both be false.
It also discusses inferences that can be drawn between categorical propositions, including subalternation, obversion, conversion, and contraposition.
4 2 t4_chapterfourpowerpoint
The document discusses different types of logical propositions and logical connectives. It defines propositions, tautologies, contradictions, and contingent claims. It then explains the different types of compound propositions using logical connectives such as conjunctions, disjunctions, negations, conditionals, and biconditionals. Various logical forms are also summarized, such as categorical propositions, Demorgan's laws, transposition, material implication, exportation, and equivalence.
13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential inaccuracies or biases that can exist in blogs, wikis, and other open content due to a lack of oversight or verification of author qualifications.
15 2 t4echapter15_powerpoint(2)
The document provides an overview of legal reasoning skills and the LSAT exam. It discusses the range of legal reasoning skills, including analyzing arguments and precedents. It explains how precedents from previous similar cases can help or hinder new cases. It also outlines the four sections of the LSAT exam and provides tips for the reading comprehension and analytical reasoning sections.
3 -2 t4-chapter_three_powerpoint_w_teays
This document provides guidance on analyzing arguments and articles through critical thinking. It discusses evaluating evidence, including facts, testimony, statistics, and different types of reasoning. It provides a checklist for weighing evidence and outlines how to structure an analysis. Key points include examining an argument's thesis, approach, claims, and quality of support, as well as looking for bias, assumptions, and weaknesses in the reasoning. The goal is to assess how convincingly the case is made and determine if it is persuasive.
12 2 t4_chaptertwelvepowerpointw_teays
The document discusses advertising techniques and assumptions. It analyzes how ads today are more subtle and sophisticated than in the past. Ads routinely make assumptions about consumers' needs, desires, fears and prejudices. Key fallacies used in advertising include appeals to popularity, improper appeals to authority, accentuating words to distort meaning, presenting only two choices when more exist, and creating ambiguities through double meanings. Effective ads use shame, optimism, solutions and rationales to sell products by addressing perceived problems.
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
The document discusses syllogisms, which are logical arguments with two premises and a conclusion. It defines the key components of a syllogism, including terms, validity, categorical propositions, and the four figures or patterns that a syllogism can take. Rules for syllogisms are also outlined, such as that the middle term must be distributed at least once and premises and conclusions must align in terms of positive and negative forms.
How to connect Literature with Cinema?
This document summarizes and compares literature works that were adapted into films. It discusses how the 1913 film Raja Harishchandra was based on Indian epics Ramayana and Mahabharata. It also analyzes similarities and differences between the novel and film versions of The Guide, and between Shakespeare's play Hamlet and the film Haider. While the stories, settings and some characters translate between works, the films also make changes to suit the new eras and means of expression. Overall, the document examines how art forms can enrich each other through adaptation while maintaining independent artistic value.
7 2 t4_chaptersevenpowerpoint
This document provides an overview of common types of fallacies, which are misleading or deceptive arguments. It discusses four major categories of fallacies: fallacies of relevance, fallacies of presumption, fallacies of ambiguity, and formal fallacies. For each category, it provides examples and explanations of specific fallacies such as ad hominem attacks, slippery slope arguments, equivocation, affirming the consequent, and more.
T whitley unit 5 project
This is one of many assignments from my Psychological Profiling course at Kaplan University, completed during my time there as a student, on Dec. 6, 2011.
Inductive methods
The document discusses several methods of inductive argumentation described by John Stuart Mill for drawing general conclusions from specific observations or facts. These include the method of agreement, method of difference, joint method of agreement and difference, method of residues, and method of concomitant variations. Examples are provided to illustrate each method and how they can be used to infer causal relationships between phenomena based on commonalities and differences observed across multiple instances.
Scientific Methods of Inquiry (2 of 5)
- A brief presentation on Method of Agreement and Method of Difference (2 out of Mill's 5 Canons)
- For USTGS 1st semester 2013-14
5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint
This document provides an overview of deductive and inductive reasoning, including the key differences between the two. It defines deductive arguments as those where the premises are sufficient to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Inductive arguments, on the other hand, can only provide partial or probabilistic support for the conclusion because there is always a "wedge of doubt" between the premises and conclusion. The document also outlines different types of deductive arguments like categorical syllogisms and modus ponens, as well as examples of inductive arguments involving predictions, cause and effect, analogy, and statistics.
Quiz show inductive & deductive reasoning
The document discusses the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning. It provides examples of statements using each type of reasoning. Deductive reasoning draws conclusions based on general rules or principles, while inductive reasoning draws conclusions based on observations or a collection of evidence, even if limited. However, both types of reasoning can lead to incorrect conclusions if not applied carefully. Stereotypes in particular are usually formed through inductive or deductive reasoning but are not always accurate.
Inductive and Deductive Methods of Archetypal Criticism
This document provides information about Northrop Frye's archetypal criticism approach. It discusses two types of criticism - meaningful criticism based on philosophy and history, and meaningless criticism. It also outlines Frye's inductive and deductive methods of archetypal analysis. The inductive method proceeds from particular truths in a text to broader truths, while the deductive method establishes the meaning of a work from general truths. It compares literature to music and painting in having rhythmic and patterned elements.
Viewers also liked (20)
Inductive and Deductive Methods of Archetypal Criticism
Inductive and Deductive Methods of Archetypal Criticism
Similar to 13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
Web site evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It begins by explaining that unlike printed materials, websites are not edited and fact checked, so not all information online is useful or accurate. It then outlines criteria to consider when evaluating websites, including authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Specific questions are provided for each criteria. The document emphasizes that no single criteria determines a website's value and that the criteria should be considered together. Students are assigned an exercise to practice evaluating websites using the outlined criteria.
Evaluating sources
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources for use in answering questions on an online reference service. It outlines six criteria for evaluating sources: authority, currency, objectivity, coverage, accuracy/verifiability, and relevance. For each criterion, it provides examples and questions to consider to determine how well the source meets that standard of evaluation. The goal is to select sources that will provide high-quality, unbiased information to answer users' questions completely and appropriately.
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It recommends asking questions about the author's expertise, potential biases, use of evidence, and publication venue. Credible sources include well-established websites from experts in the field, as well as mainstream news sites. Government and educational websites ending in .gov and .edu require additional scrutiny. Fact-checking sites can help verify questionable information. Overall, critical evaluation of sources is important to determine what can reasonably be considered factual.
Web Site Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It discusses that unlike printed materials, websites are not edited and information online is not always accurate. It then outlines criteria to evaluate websites, including authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. The document explains each criterion in detail and provides examples and questions to consider for each one. The overall message is that students should carefully analyze websites using these criteria before determining their value for research.
Web Site Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It discusses how the internet has changed research and that not all online information is accurate. It then outlines five criteria for evaluating websites: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. The document explains each of these criteria in detail and provides examples to illustrate how to apply them when assessing the reliability of information on a given website. The overall message is that students need to carefully evaluate websites using these standards to determine their value for research.
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability and credibility of information sources. It discusses five key factors to consider: currency, accuracy, authority, relevance, and purpose. Currency refers to how up-to-date the information is. Accuracy means the information is supported by facts and evidence. Authority is the credentials and expertise of the author. Relevance is how closely the information relates to the topic. Purpose considers why the source was created and potential biases. Students are encouraged to think critically about sources by investigating these factors.
You’re not a dog
This document provides guidance on establishing an online presence as a lawyer. It discusses ethics rules regarding communications about legal services and advises authentic engagement over spamming or deception. Key recommendations include listening to audiences, asking questions, responding promptly, demonstrating expertise through articles and links, and establishing a genuine voice. The document warns that all online actions are public and permanent, and encourages developing useful, unique content to meet information demands while avoiding stock images or identities.
You’re Not A Dog: How Lawyers Can Put Their Best Foot Forward Online
As famous New Yorker cartoon goes, “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” But as a lawyer, “being a dog” may cost you your two most valuable assets, your reputation and your license.
Further, as the web continues to “go social”, web users will become better at identifying dogs. Let’s talk about how you can put your best foot forward online in an ethical, as well as, effective manner.
This slide deck is courtesy Gyi Tsakalakis, of AttorneySync.com. Gyi has been helping lawyers understand how to put the web to work for their practices since 2008. A former practicing attorney, Gyi is a law firm web strategist and owner at AttorneySync.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. CARRDSS stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reliability, Relevance, Date, Sources, Scope. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating online sources to ensure high quality information is being used for research and academic work.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It discusses evaluating the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Criteria like author credentials, publisher, inclusion of about/contact pages, consistency with other sources, and presence of errors can help determine a site's accuracy and credibility. The domain name suffix can also provide clues about a site's potential biases. High-quality sources are important for research and ensuring informed decision making. Teachers will evaluate student work based on the quality of sources cited.
Evaluating Information Sources
This document discusses criteria for evaluating information sources, including accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It explains questions to ask about each criterion, such as whether information is cited, who is responsible for the content, potential biases, publication dates, and scope. Website domains like .edu, .gov and .org are generally more reliable than .com, but all sources require evaluating based on these five criteria.
Research Presentation
The document provides information on evaluating sources found on the internet. It discusses how Wikipedia may not be a reliable academic source due to lack of editorial oversight. It also discusses how to determine the authority, objectivity, currency and coverage of a website to evaluate if it is a good source. The document provides examples of citation styles and discusses avoiding plagiarism by properly citing sources.
Website Evaluation Tutorial
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency means how recently information/links were updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Librarians can also assist with difficult-to-evaluate sites.
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency evaluates how recently the site was updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Considering the criteria together provides a holistic evaluation of a website's reliability and usefulness.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for credibility and reliability to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite in a research paper. It outlines several criteria to consider, including assessing the author's credentials, accuracy and bias of the information, date of publication, documentation of sources, and purpose and intended audience of the site. Students are encouraged to think critically about the credibility of online information and not rely solely on free websites, but also use library databases and consult their teacher-librarian for source recommendations.
Online Research (2)
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider that can help determine whether a site is a good source of information or not. The document also provides some tips on using search engines like Google to investigate authors, sponsors and potential biases. It recommends additional online research resources available through the HISD library system.
Criteria
This document provides criteria for evaluating the quality and reliability of information found on websites. It discusses 6 key criteria: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage, and clarity. For each criterion, the document explains why it is important and provides examples of both reliable and unreliable websites to illustrate how to apply each criterion when assessing websites. The overall message is that anyone can publish anything on the internet, so it is important to carefully evaluate websites using established criteria before trusting the information they contain.
Online Research
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider in determining whether a site meets that standard, such as checking for author credentials, obvious mistakes, biased or inflammatory language, dated content, and usability of navigation. The document advises using search engines like Google to investigate authors and sponsors when information is missing from sites, and provides additional tips for effective online research.
Can you trust_the_web
The document discusses how to evaluate information found on the web through careful analysis. It provides four key steps: 1) examine the URL and publisher to determine potential biases, 2) investigate the author's credentials and expertise on the topic, 3) check the date to ensure currency, and 4) analyze the purpose and potential biases in presentation of the information. The document stresses the importance of skepticism when evaluating online sources, as there are no standards regulating information accuracy on the web like in published sources.
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27Riverside County Office of Education
The document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of internet sources. It discusses how information can spread quickly online before being verified. Readers are encouraged to scrutinize sources by considering whether the author is an expert, has an agenda, and cites evidence. Search engines like SweetSearch that curate reliable sources are recommended. The conclusion emphasizes that credible ideas will be supported by many trustworthy sources and the scientific process rather than just emotion or a single perspective.Similar to 13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays (20)
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Dean R Berry Determining the Credibility of Sources
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideaspart 1.pptx
You’re Not A Dog: How Lawyers Can Put Their Best Foot Forward Online
You’re Not A Dog: How Lawyers Can Put Their Best Foot Forward Online
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
Dean r berry a determining the credibilitey of sources final 2 27
More from sagebennet
Existentialism sartre etc.-
Existentialism was concerned with radical freedom, the nature of being, and responsibility. Key figures included Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Martin Heidegger, and Edmund Husserl. Sartre believed that existence precedes essence, meaning humans define themselves through their actions rather than having a predetermined nature. For Sartre, people are condemned to be free without excuses or God, resulting in anguish over absolute responsibility. De Beauvoir applied existentialist thought to feminism, arguing that womanhood is a social construct used to oppress women. Phenomenology focused on investigating conscious experiences without assumptions, while Heidegger explored the question of being and our tendency to get lost
New thought
New Thought is a distinctively American religious movement that began in the 19th century based on the ideas that thoughts can create reality and healing. It emphasizes the power of the mind in areas like intuition, spiritual healing, and creating one's own reality through affirmative prayer and meditation. Some key figures in the development of New Thought include Ralph Waldo Emerson, Phineas Quimby, Mary Baker Eddy, and Ernest Holmes. The document contrasts the concepts of visualization, which uses premeditated ideas, and visioning, which tries to let visions come without preconceptions in order to be pulled by a higher vision.
10a chaptertenpowerpoint new
The document discusses various rules of inference used in deductive reasoning. It defines validity and provides examples of valid argument forms like modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism, and disjunctive syllogism. It also discusses fallacies like affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent that invalidate arguments despite having true premises. The document aims to explain logical reasoning tools to evaluate arguments.
8 chapter eightpowerpoint
This document summarizes key concepts in causal and statistical reasoning. It discusses cause and effect relationships, associations versus causal relationships, and fallacies involving false correlations. It also outlines philosopher John Stuart Mill's methods for determining causation, including the method of agreement, method of difference, joint method, and method of concomitant variation. Finally, it discusses aspects of statistical studies such as sample size, diversity, and margin of error, as well as the forms and strength of statistical arguments.
14b 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint
The document provides guidance on critically analyzing popular culture works through examining both their context and content. It emphasizes the importance of considering the context, such as the intended audience, socio-political climate, and any underlying agendas. When assessing the content, it recommends analyzing elements like genre, plot, characters, narrative impact, and levels of interpretation. The tools outlined help readers look beneath the surface and draw meaningful insights about the influences and reflections of society within various popular works.
14a 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint_new
This document discusses the important role that journalists play in society by reporting news and analyzing issues in historical and political context. It warns against "tabloidism" and focuses too much on sensational stories rather than more significant issues. The document also emphasizes that a free press is vital for a democratic society by presenting a range of perspectives to help citizens become informed and think for themselves.
6 2 t4_chaptersixpowerpoint
The document discusses the use and analysis of analogical reasoning. It explains that an argument from analogy compares two things based on similarities to assert that a characteristic true of one thing is also true of the other. Analogies are commonly used in law, where previous cases set precedents that lawyers and judges use to reason about new cases. The document provides guidance on analyzing analogies, including identifying similarities and differences, and assessing whether an analogy is strong or weak based on the relative weight of the similarities versus differences. It also discusses how hypothetical scenarios are used in legal training to prepare students for analogical reasoning in applying laws and precedents to new cases.
4 2 t4_chapterfourpowerpoint
The document discusses different types of logical propositions and logical connectives. It defines propositions, tautologies, contradictions, and contingent claims. It then explains the structure of simple and compound propositions. The five logical connectives - conjunction, disjunction, negation, conditional, and biconditional - are defined. Various propositional forms are also described, including categorical propositions, conditional claims, and equivalence. Logical rules like DeMorgan's laws, transposition, material implication, exportation, and equivalence are outlined.
2 2 t4e_chapter_two_powerpoint_new1
The document discusses the components of an argument, including the thesis/conclusion and premises/evidence. It provides examples of how to describe facts versus inferences and how to analyze arguments by identifying assumptions, locating the conclusion, evaluating the strength of evidence/premises, and putting arguments in standard form. Transition words are also discussed.
1 2 t4_chapter_one_powerpoint_new
The document provides an overview of critical thinking skills and discusses addressing obstacles to developing those skills. It defines stereotypes as overgeneralizations that can bog down thinking and provides examples. It also discusses adopting multiple perspectives, recognizing biased language, and analyzing arguments by evaluating their structure and the truth of any premises.
Indigeneous religions
The document discusses several aspects of indigenous religions around the world including those of ancient Hawaiians, Native Americans, Inuit, Aboriginal Australians, and Maori of New Zealand. It covers obstacles to appreciating these religions, modern recovery efforts, and key elements like a respectful relationship with nature, the concepts of sacred time and space, the importance of origins, gods, and ancestors, and sacred practices like rituals and ceremonies. The document also addresses current threats facing indigenous religions from globalization, loss of lands and languages, and religious conversion.
Slide Show on Global Citizenship
The document discusses ways for people of all religious traditions to offer service and act as global citizens. It defines a global citizen as someone who is knowledgeable about other cultures beyond their own, understands global interdependence, and is committed to sustainability and social change. It provides examples of how to practice global citizenship, such as questioning stereotypes, celebrating diversity, thinking critically about global issues, and taking action against injustice.
Affirmative action 1
Affirmative action aims to remedy past discrimination and promote equal opportunity in employment and education by giving preferential treatment to minorities and women who have faced unjust mistreatment. Weak affirmative action, which ensures equal consideration without preferences, is less controversial than strong affirmative action, which actively prefers some groups over others to compensate for historical injustices and achieve diversity. Debates around affirmative action consider whether racial preferences for any group are justified or if they can be counterproductive.
More from sagebennet (13)
Recently uploaded
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...Edge AI and Vision Alliance
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software Fuzzing
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Revolutionizing Application Development
with AI-powered low-code, presentation by George Aspiotis, Sr. Partner Development Manager, Microsoft
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
Threats to mobile devices are more prevalent and increasing in scope and complexity. Users of mobile devices desire to take full advantage of the features
available on those devices, but many of the features provide convenience and capability but sacrifice security. This best practices guide outlines steps the users can take to better protect personal devices and information.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
Artificial Intelligence for XMLDevelopment
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
Recently uploaded (20)
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing Days
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
- 1. Chapter 13 Web Sight: Critical Thinking and the Internet Second Thoughts, 4th ed . Wanda Teays McGraw-Hill Higher Ed ©2010. Wanda Teays. All Rights Reserved.