This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the reliability and credibility of information found on websites. It discusses looking at the source of the information, including the author's credentials and expertise, as well as the type of organization responsible for the website. It also discusses considering the purpose and potential bias of the website by examining its intended audience and agenda. Finally, it discusses evaluating the accuracy and currency of the website's content by looking for citations, references, and dates. Checklists and additional resources for evaluating websites are also provided.
This Lecture introduces students to Reference Sources.
It discusses both print and digital Sources of Information, including features which are need.
The Lecture asks various questions regarding the new skills needed by the user to survive in the digital arena.
Additionally, Assignment ground-rules are also suggested, including International methods of citation, citation tools and also note-taking skills.
Presented at the seminar Libraries and the Semantic Web: the role of International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), National Library of Scotland, Edinburgh, 25 Feb 2011
Collection evaluation techniques for academic libraries ALISS
Sally Halper, Lead Content Specialist - Business & Management, British Library. An excellent introduction to some really good practical qualitative and quantitative tools including White's brief tests. A bibliography of further readings is also provided.
This Lecture introduces students to Reference Sources.
It discusses both print and digital Sources of Information, including features which are need.
The Lecture asks various questions regarding the new skills needed by the user to survive in the digital arena.
Additionally, Assignment ground-rules are also suggested, including International methods of citation, citation tools and also note-taking skills.
Presented at the seminar Libraries and the Semantic Web: the role of International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), National Library of Scotland, Edinburgh, 25 Feb 2011
Collection evaluation techniques for academic libraries ALISS
Sally Halper, Lead Content Specialist - Business & Management, British Library. An excellent introduction to some really good practical qualitative and quantitative tools including White's brief tests. A bibliography of further readings is also provided.
This is an overview of the fundamentals of Resource Description and Access (RDA) for catalogers and non-catalogers presented by Linh Uong and Jolanta Radzik at the 23rd Annual COMO 2011 Conference in Athens, GA.
DOMAINS OF USER STUDIES (User Studies and User Education)Libcorpio
Domains of User Studies, User Studies, User Education, Library users, LIS Education, Library and Information Science, LIS Studies, Information Management, Education and Learning, Library science, Information science,
En el año 1935 Ortega y Gasset dicta en Madrid el discurso inaugural del Congreso Internacional de Bibliotecarios bajo el título Misión del bibliotecario.
DOCUMENT SELECTION AND ACQUISITION,
Introduction,
5.2 Ascertaining Users Needs,
5.3 Selection of Documents,
5.4 Selection Principles,
5.5 Selection Criteria,
5.6 Selection Aids/Tools,
5.6.1 Selection Tools for Addition of New Publications,
5.6.2 Selection Tools for Addition of Old Publications,
5.7 Methods of Acquisition,
5.7.1 Acquisition through Purchase Order,
5.7.2 Acquisition through Membership,
5.7.3 Acquisition under Exchange Arrangement,
5.7.4 Acquisition through Gifts,
5.7.5 Acquisition under Deposit System,
5.7.6 Order and Receipt Process,
5.8 Accession Work,
5.8.1 Accession Policy,
5.8.2 Accession Work Procedure,
5.9 Acquisition of Serials,
5.9.1 Serials Basics,
5.9.2 Selection of Suppliers,
5.9.3 Consortia as Method of Acquisition,
5.9.4 Order System,
5.9.5 Registration or Check-in Record,
5.10 Summary,
5.11 Answers to Self Check Exercises,
5.12 Keywords,
A brief introduction to the idea of controlled vocabulary in library databases with "quiz," screenshots, and basic instructions on finding subject terms and using database thesauri
This presentation looks at different ways to simply improve the interior and exterior of your library. We discuss the Bookstore Model, layout, and flow.
An introduction to assigning subject descriptors to an information object, including subject headings (LCSH, Sears) and other controlled vocabularies like thesauri (Getty AAT).
Catalogar en ISBD (International Standard Bibliographic Description = Descripción Bibliográfica de manera Normalizada Intenacional). Formato IberMARC (MAchine Readable Cataloging) Clasificación con LEMBP (Lista de Encabezamientos de Materia para Bibliotecas Públicas) y con CDU (Clasificación Decimal Universal). En SIGB (Sistemas Integrados de Gestión Bibliotecaria) y OPAC 2.0 (Online Public Access Cataloguing) o catalogación social.
This is an overview of the fundamentals of Resource Description and Access (RDA) for catalogers and non-catalogers presented by Linh Uong and Jolanta Radzik at the 23rd Annual COMO 2011 Conference in Athens, GA.
DOMAINS OF USER STUDIES (User Studies and User Education)Libcorpio
Domains of User Studies, User Studies, User Education, Library users, LIS Education, Library and Information Science, LIS Studies, Information Management, Education and Learning, Library science, Information science,
En el año 1935 Ortega y Gasset dicta en Madrid el discurso inaugural del Congreso Internacional de Bibliotecarios bajo el título Misión del bibliotecario.
DOCUMENT SELECTION AND ACQUISITION,
Introduction,
5.2 Ascertaining Users Needs,
5.3 Selection of Documents,
5.4 Selection Principles,
5.5 Selection Criteria,
5.6 Selection Aids/Tools,
5.6.1 Selection Tools for Addition of New Publications,
5.6.2 Selection Tools for Addition of Old Publications,
5.7 Methods of Acquisition,
5.7.1 Acquisition through Purchase Order,
5.7.2 Acquisition through Membership,
5.7.3 Acquisition under Exchange Arrangement,
5.7.4 Acquisition through Gifts,
5.7.5 Acquisition under Deposit System,
5.7.6 Order and Receipt Process,
5.8 Accession Work,
5.8.1 Accession Policy,
5.8.2 Accession Work Procedure,
5.9 Acquisition of Serials,
5.9.1 Serials Basics,
5.9.2 Selection of Suppliers,
5.9.3 Consortia as Method of Acquisition,
5.9.4 Order System,
5.9.5 Registration or Check-in Record,
5.10 Summary,
5.11 Answers to Self Check Exercises,
5.12 Keywords,
A brief introduction to the idea of controlled vocabulary in library databases with "quiz," screenshots, and basic instructions on finding subject terms and using database thesauri
This presentation looks at different ways to simply improve the interior and exterior of your library. We discuss the Bookstore Model, layout, and flow.
An introduction to assigning subject descriptors to an information object, including subject headings (LCSH, Sears) and other controlled vocabularies like thesauri (Getty AAT).
Catalogar en ISBD (International Standard Bibliographic Description = Descripción Bibliográfica de manera Normalizada Intenacional). Formato IberMARC (MAchine Readable Cataloging) Clasificación con LEMBP (Lista de Encabezamientos de Materia para Bibliotecas Públicas) y con CDU (Clasificación Decimal Universal). En SIGB (Sistemas Integrados de Gestión Bibliotecaria) y OPAC 2.0 (Online Public Access Cataloguing) o catalogación social.
How to modify your search to get more, better results.
See what a search looks like in a Venn Diagram and in a search box.
Three top tips:
Truncation / wildcard *
-- Read* = read, reading, reader, readership
-- Magazine* = magazine, magazines
Combine additional search terms with OR
Look at database search terms for more ideas
See this PowerPoint in YouTube with voiceover. http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=CBMcsLidQPY
Evaluating Web Resources: Criteria for Educatorstslee6
The way children think is learning is changing, given the affordances of our digitally rich and connected world. With ever increasing choice and the ability for anyone to publish to the web educators are now more than ever challenged to find web resources that will suitable engage, challenge and fulfil the needs of our twenty-first century learners.
The criteria is presented under four distinct headings: authority, design, content and pedagogy.
Used to teach evaluating sources, particularly web sources, to my high school students.
Adapted from Cathy Nelson's Information Evaluation slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/cnelson/web-evaluation-2015135
ACRL 2017: Academic Libraries, Filtering, & the Tyranny of ChoiceElizabeth Namei
Choices abound in all aspects of life, from where we shop, to what we shop for, to how we obtain and consume media, food and information. Variety is ubiquitous and expected. Likewise, academic libraries are also providing users with an array of choices: different sources, formats, search tools and even study spaces and service points. Research has found, paradoxically, that more choice often leads to less satisfaction. Libraries have introduced various filters (relevance algorithms, advanced search forms, format limiters, etc.) to help users navigate the abundance of choices being presented to them. By filters we mean mechanisms for narrowing, customizing, or even expanding options, depending on the parameters of the need at hand. Filters are also implemented behind the scenes (approval plans, short term loans, etc.) to help streamline library workflow and productivity.
This paper presents the results of a mixed method study aimed at gaining a better understanding of the impact of “filters” on library workflows, collections, services and users. We will explore the potential for automated filters to have unintended consequences and will present recommendations for how filters might be adapted and harnessed to enhance the overall library user experience.
Students need help learning that just because it came from Google doesn't make it factual. This is a powerpoint lesson that reviews how to evaluate a website. It is used in conjunction with live examples, Nettrekker, and a rubric activity for evaluating websites.
Ron E. Lewis Library Thinking Critically about Web I.docxhealdkathaleen
Ron E. Lewis Library
Thinking Critically about Web Information—Applying the CRAAP Test*
When you search the Web, you’re going to find a lot of information…but is it credible and reliable? Use this
guide to help you determine this for yourself. Give your Web page a score based on this point system. Is
your Web source credible and reliable or is it a bunch of … ? SCORE _______
Checking for C-R-A-A-P! POINTS: 0 1 2 3
Currency or Timeliness
How important is it for your
topic to have recent
information? Science,
technology, and health
information need to be as
recent as possible. If yes,
how current is the
information?
There is no indication
of when the site was
created or updated.
The site was
created is over 5
years ago with no
date given for
updating.
The site was
created, revised or
updated within the
last 5 years. If they
are citing sources,
they are also
recent.
The site was created,
revised or updated
within the last 2
years. If they are
citing sources, they
are also recent.
Relevance
Is this the information you
need for your topic?
Consider the type of
information needed
(primary sources or
secondary sources)
statistics, history or
background information.
It mentions my topic
briefly but not much
else. Or it isn’t the
type of information I
need. Or it isn’t
enough information.
It provides some
information, but it’s
not enough, or it’s
not the right type of
information.
It provides most of
what I need, but I
still need more or
another type of
information.
It is exactly on the
subject, is the right
amount of information
and the right type of
information.
Authority.
Locate the author or
sponsor and Google the
name to find out more.
What else have they
published on the topic? Are
there any credentials for
the person to establish
them as expert? Is it the
main organization that
provides information about
a topic?
There is either no
author, or the author
is possibly a student
or an ordinary
person publishing on
the Web without
expertise. Or the
organization is not
known. Text errors
indicate the author is
not an expert.
Author is named
but with no
credentials. Or the
organization is of
questionable
authority. Web
groups can name
themselves with
names that sound
like other credible
organizations.
Author is named
but the degree of
expertise is not that
high.
Or, the
organization, is
well-known, and but
the degree of
expertise on this
subject is not clear.
The author’s
credentials are given
and clearly indicate
that he/she is an
expert.
Or the organization is
well-known and highly
credible on the topic.
Accuracy
Are there any sources cited
for the information?
Are images/photos labeled
and credited?
Information is
provided with no
indication as to
where it comes from.
There is a vague
reference to the
information source.
Ass ...
2. Evaluating Web Resources
The Internet can be a valuable tool when you’re
researching a topic. But when you use the Internet to
search for information, it’s especially important to evaluate
the information you find there.
Why? Read on…
3. Why Evaluate Web Resources?
Anyone with an Internet connection can
post information on the web, regardless
of their expertise. How do you know that
the information on that “perfect” website
you found comes from someone who
knows what he’s talking about? How can
you tell if the information is meant to
promote a person’s or a group’s agenda?
Without careful evaluation, you may
unknowingly be citing inaccurate
information.
When determining whether a website is reliable,
think about the information’s
source, purpose, and content.
4. Source – Who produced this information?
Authority
Who is the author of the page? What are the
author’s credentials (academic degrees, job titles,
etc.)? Is the author’s contact information
provided?
Look at the top and bottom of the page or
look for an “About the Author” link to find
biographical information about the author, as
well any organizations with which they are
affiliated (universities, corporations, nonprofits,
etc.).
Try searching for the author’s name in a search
engine like Google to find more information
about the author, including other works they
have written.
5. Source – Who produced this information?
Authority (continued)
What organization is responsible for this website?
Look at the domain of the website to find out what type of organization it
comes from.
.edu: academic website; generally considered reliable, but a tilde (~) in the
URL often indicates that it is a personal page (perhaps a student’s project)
and needs careful consideration.
.gov: government website; generally considered objective and reliable.
6. Source – Who produced this information?
Authority (continued)
What organization is responsible for this website?
More domain types…
.org: non-profit organization website; often reliable, but depending
on the organization they may also be biased toward that
organization’s point of view or agenda.
.com: commercial website; the business responsible for the site may
be trying to sell a product or have some other motivation, so the site
may present biased or incomplete information.
7. Source – Who produced this information?
Authority (continued)
What organization is responsible for this website?
Look at the URL (the page’s address). The name that
comes after http:// is usually the name of the
organization that owns the larger website where the
page is found.
Look for an “About” or “About Us” link on the site for
more information about the organization.
8. Purpose – Why was this information produced?
Audience
Who is the intended audience for this
website? Is it intended for general readers,
consumers, students, researchers, members
of a political party, members of a
profession, etc.? Look for:
technical terminology specific to a
particular field or profession.
the reading level (easy or challenging);
this may indicate whether the site was
intended for a general audience or for
experts.
ads and other graphics; these are usually targeted at the website’s intended
audience. Graphics and ads for popular products usually indicate that the
site is geared toward a general audience. Ads targeted at professionals in a
specific field are clues that those same professionals are probably the
intended audience for that website.
9. Purpose – Why was this information produced?
Bias
Does the organization or author responsible for the site have a
particular agenda?
Look for an “About” or “Info” link for information about the
group responsible for the site. This might include a “Mission
Statement” which states the group’s purpose.
If the website does not provide sufficient information about the
organization or author, try searching in a search engine like
Google for more background information about them.
Think about what the organization or author stands to gain by
producing the website.
Think about what the purpose of the site might be – is it to
inform, explain, entertain, advocate, advertise, or something
else?
10. Purpose – Why was this information produced?
Bias (continued)
Does the page present a balanced view of the issue, or does it only
promote a particular point of view? Is the author being objective or
biased?
Look at the language the author uses – is it emotional and
inflammatory, or is it more moderate?
Think about the kinds of facts the author cites, and whether the
author is leaving out important information.
11. Content – When and where does this information come from?
Currency
When was the website produced? When was it
last updated?
Look for a publication date near the top or
bottom of the page.
Keep in mind that even if the “Last Updated”
date is recent, the information on the page
might still be old. The last update may have
only been to fix a typo or update contact
information.
Check to see if any links are broken. Broken
links indicate a site that is out of date.
Remember that some subjects require very
current information (like science, technology,
or medicine), while in some subjects older
information can still be valid (like history or
literature).
12. Content – When and where does this information come from?
Accuracy
Does the author support any claims he
or she makes with facts and data? Does
he or she document where the data
came from? Can you verify this data in
other sources?
Look for a bibliography or list of
references at the end of the page.
Does the author cite other well-known
or reliable sources?
Look for links to outside sources. Do
these links point to other reputable
websites?
Compare the data cited on the web
page to other trusted sources to
verify accuracy.
13. Other resources for evaluating websites
Evaluating Websites checklist
http://www.lib.unc.edu/instruct/evaluate/websites.pdf
(University of North Carolina Libraries)
Evaluating Internet Resources
https://www.wou.edu/provost/library/clip/tutorials/eval_internet.htm
(source: Cooperative Library Instruction Project; video tutorial)
Evaluating Internet Resources
http://www.wou.edu/provost/library/clip/source/scripts/eval_internet.doc
(source: Cooperative Library Instruction Project; text version)