2 2 t4e_chapter_two_powerpoint_new1
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•678 views
The document discusses the components of an argument, including the thesis/conclusion and premises/evidence. It provides examples of how to describe facts versus inferences and how to analyze arguments by identifying assumptions, locating the conclusion, evaluating the strength of evidence/premises, and putting arguments in standard form. Transition words are also discussed.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Patterns of Development
This document outlines 9 common patterns of development used in writing: 1) Narration tells a story, 2) Classification divides a subject into types or categories, 3) Comparison and contrast explains how subjects are similar or different, 4) Cause and effect explains reasons for events and describes results, 5) Description portrays people, things, places or situations, 6) Persuasion tries to convince the reader of a point of view, 7) Example supports a topic using illustrations, 8) Definition explains what something is compared to other members of its class, and 9) Problem-solution identifies an issue and proposes solutions. The document was prepared by Mary Jane Manuel Tanuan.
Identifying arguments
This document discusses arguments and how to identify their key components. An argument consists of premises that provide reasons or evidence to support a conclusion. Common words that indicate premises include "because" and "since," while conclusion indicators are words like "therefore" and "thus." To identify an argument's conclusion, determine what claim the author is trying to prove or see which statement fits best after "therefore." A passage only qualifies as an argument if it contains at least two statements and one is intended to support another as true or more probable. The document also differentiates arguments from reports, unsupported opinions, illustrations, conditional statements, and explanations.
Notes for logic
1. The document discusses the key concepts of logic including arguments, propositions, premises, conclusions and the validity of arguments.
2. It provides examples to illustrate inductive and deductive arguments, and distinguishes between arguments and explanations.
3. Arguments are considered valid if the truth of the premises necessarily implies the truth of the conclusion, while invalid arguments can have true premises and conclusions but the conclusion does not logically follow.
Identifying claims
This document discusses identifying explicit and implicit claims in arguments. It defines explicit claims as those directly stated using words like "because", while implicit claims refer to underlying assumptions and values. The document provides a framework for analyzing arguments by: 1) stating the thesis, 2) identifying explicit reasons and evidence for each, 3) determining implicit reasons and contextual evidence, and 4) evaluating the logic and validity. Identifying implicit assumptions is challenging but reveals the real issues and values underlying an argument.
The Thesis Statement And You
This document provides guidance on writing effective thesis statements. It explains that thesis statements present a clear claim and the grounds or reasons supporting that claim. A good thesis statement takes a debatable position, can be adequately supported within the scope of the assignment, and indicates how the claim will be proven. The document offers examples of strong thesis statements that state a specific claim and the reasons for it, as well as examples of weak thesis statements that are too general or simply restate the topic rather than taking a position. Words like "always" and "every" should be avoided in thesis statements since they make claims that are hard to sufficiently support.
Induction & deduction
The document discusses inductive and deductive approaches to research. Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to more specific conclusions, taking a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories in a "bottom-up" approach. Arguments based on rules and principles use deduction, while observations tend to use induction. While deduction leads to certain conclusions, induction draws conclusions that are probable but not certain from observations.
English: Claims
This document defines key terms used in forming arguments and analyzing claims, including:
- Main claim/thesis statement: The overall argument or position being advocated
- Sub-claims: Specific points or pieces of evidence used to support the main claim
- Evidence: Facts, data, examples, expert opinions, etc. used to validate claims
It also provides an example of analyzing philosopher Sam Harris' argument that science can help answer moral questions, outlining his main thesis and two supporting sub-claims backed by examples. Readers are instructed to evaluate whether evidence supports an author's main and sub-claims when analyzing an argument.
Thesis statement (brief summary by Hernán Ortiz)
The document discusses the key components of an effective thesis statement, including that it is a single, specific claim that an essay supports. A good thesis statement includes a topic, precise opinion, and reasoning. It tells the reader where the essay is going and how the writer plans to get there. A thesis statement is always arguable and consists of three parts: the subject or topic, the writer's opinion on that topic, and a blueprint of at least three reasons or pieces of evidence to back up the opinion.
Recommended
Patterns of Development
This document outlines 9 common patterns of development used in writing: 1) Narration tells a story, 2) Classification divides a subject into types or categories, 3) Comparison and contrast explains how subjects are similar or different, 4) Cause and effect explains reasons for events and describes results, 5) Description portrays people, things, places or situations, 6) Persuasion tries to convince the reader of a point of view, 7) Example supports a topic using illustrations, 8) Definition explains what something is compared to other members of its class, and 9) Problem-solution identifies an issue and proposes solutions. The document was prepared by Mary Jane Manuel Tanuan.
Identifying arguments
This document discusses arguments and how to identify their key components. An argument consists of premises that provide reasons or evidence to support a conclusion. Common words that indicate premises include "because" and "since," while conclusion indicators are words like "therefore" and "thus." To identify an argument's conclusion, determine what claim the author is trying to prove or see which statement fits best after "therefore." A passage only qualifies as an argument if it contains at least two statements and one is intended to support another as true or more probable. The document also differentiates arguments from reports, unsupported opinions, illustrations, conditional statements, and explanations.
Notes for logic
1. The document discusses the key concepts of logic including arguments, propositions, premises, conclusions and the validity of arguments.
2. It provides examples to illustrate inductive and deductive arguments, and distinguishes between arguments and explanations.
3. Arguments are considered valid if the truth of the premises necessarily implies the truth of the conclusion, while invalid arguments can have true premises and conclusions but the conclusion does not logically follow.
Identifying claims
This document discusses identifying explicit and implicit claims in arguments. It defines explicit claims as those directly stated using words like "because", while implicit claims refer to underlying assumptions and values. The document provides a framework for analyzing arguments by: 1) stating the thesis, 2) identifying explicit reasons and evidence for each, 3) determining implicit reasons and contextual evidence, and 4) evaluating the logic and validity. Identifying implicit assumptions is challenging but reveals the real issues and values underlying an argument.
The Thesis Statement And You
This document provides guidance on writing effective thesis statements. It explains that thesis statements present a clear claim and the grounds or reasons supporting that claim. A good thesis statement takes a debatable position, can be adequately supported within the scope of the assignment, and indicates how the claim will be proven. The document offers examples of strong thesis statements that state a specific claim and the reasons for it, as well as examples of weak thesis statements that are too general or simply restate the topic rather than taking a position. Words like "always" and "every" should be avoided in thesis statements since they make claims that are hard to sufficiently support.
Induction & deduction
The document discusses inductive and deductive approaches to research. Deductive reasoning moves from general premises to more specific conclusions, taking a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories in a "bottom-up" approach. Arguments based on rules and principles use deduction, while observations tend to use induction. While deduction leads to certain conclusions, induction draws conclusions that are probable but not certain from observations.
English: Claims
This document defines key terms used in forming arguments and analyzing claims, including:
- Main claim/thesis statement: The overall argument or position being advocated
- Sub-claims: Specific points or pieces of evidence used to support the main claim
- Evidence: Facts, data, examples, expert opinions, etc. used to validate claims
It also provides an example of analyzing philosopher Sam Harris' argument that science can help answer moral questions, outlining his main thesis and two supporting sub-claims backed by examples. Readers are instructed to evaluate whether evidence supports an author's main and sub-claims when analyzing an argument.
Thesis statement (brief summary by Hernán Ortiz)
The document discusses the key components of an effective thesis statement, including that it is a single, specific claim that an essay supports. A good thesis statement includes a topic, precise opinion, and reasoning. It tells the reader where the essay is going and how the writer plans to get there. A thesis statement is always arguable and consists of three parts: the subject or topic, the writer's opinion on that topic, and a blueprint of at least three reasons or pieces of evidence to back up the opinion.
Persuasion argumentation
The document discusses how to craft persuasive arguments. It explains that all arguments appeal to logos, ethos, or pathos. Logos appeals to logic and reason through evidence like facts, statistics, and cause-and-effect relationships. Ethos appeals to the speaker's credibility. Pathos appeals to the audience's emotions by connecting with them and evoking feelings. The document also lists different types of evidence that can be used such as values, expert opinions, statistics, analogies, facts, examples, anecdotes, and traditions.
The reflective essay_final[1]
The document provides information about reflective essays, including what they are, their purpose, and how to structure them. It defines a reflective essay as exploring a topic using personal thoughts and experiences. It recommends organizing a group reflective essay by combining individual reflections in an organized manner following the essay format. It provides guidelines for writing thesis statements, topic sentences, body paragraphs, and conclusions. Examples of an introduction and graphic organizer are also included to illustrate the concepts.
Basic Concepts of Logic
This document provides an overview of basic concepts in logic, including:
- Logic is defined as the science of reasoning, concerned with determining correct vs incorrect reasoning.
- Reasoning involves making inferences by drawing conclusions from premises. Arguments consist of statements where one is the conclusion and the others are premises intended to support the conclusion.
- Logic divides into deductive logic and inductive logic. Deductive logic examines necessarily truth-preserving arguments, while inductive logic examines arguments where the premises make the conclusion probable but not certain.
Understanding and identifying text structure 1
This document discusses text structure and patterns that can help readers understand a text. It provides examples of common text structures such as comparison/contrast, definition, sequence, and location. Signal words are given as clues to help identify each structure. Understanding text structure can help readers comprehend and recall the information presented.
1.2 Recognizing Arguments
This document discusses how to identify and analyze arguments. An argument must have at least one premise and a conclusion. It also discusses different types of statements that are not arguments, such as warnings, advice, opinions, and reports. Conditional statements on their own are not arguments, but can be used as part of an argument. Necessary conditions are required for something to occur, while sufficient conditions alone are enough to trigger something.
Argumentative Writing
This document provides an overview of the key elements of an argumentative essay, including considering the audience, introducing the topic, stating the thesis, providing reasons and evidence to support the position, addressing counterarguments, and concluding by restating the argument. It discusses the importance of the hook, background information, and thesis statement in the introduction and specific elements like position, reasons, evidence, and rebuttal that are needed in the body. The conclusion should restate the argument and can include a prediction or warning. It also provides some potential references on argumentative writing.
Persuasion (Pattern of Development in Reading and Writing)
A persuasive paragraph aims to convince readers to do or believe something. There are three common techniques used in developing a persuasive paragraph: using evidence such as facts, statistics from experts and research; giving examples that are concrete, relevant and reasonable; and attacking opposing views by belittling or dismissing opposing ideas.
Reasoning
1. Reasoning involves creating conclusions from evidence or premises through either inductive or deductive logic.
2. Inductive reasoning creates generalizations from examples while deductive reasoning applies generalizations to specific cases through major and minor premises that lead to a conclusion.
3. Common fallacies in reasoning include false dilemmas, appeals to emotion, slippery slopes, ad hominem attacks, hasty generalizations, and circular or ignorant arguments.
Lesson on patterns of development
This document provides information on paragraph rhetoric models, including describing, defining, classification, compare/contrast, and cause and effect. It discusses how to write paragraphs using these models, with examples for each. Key details covered include using sensory details in descriptive paragraphs, extending dictionary definitions, organizing compare/contrast paragraphs in block or point-by-point format, and establishing direct and indirect causes and effects. The document also reviews patterns of development in writing like narration, description, definition, exemplification, and persuasion.
Patterns of Definition
Here is a 7 sentence paragraph defining friendship:
A friend is someone you can trust and rely on. They are there for you during both good and bad times. My best friend Sarah and I have been friends since elementary school. I remember we used to play together every day after class and tell each other everything. She was always so supportive and caring. Even now as adults, though we don't see each other as much, I know she will always be there if I need her. True friendship is built on loyalty, trust and unconditional support, and that is what Sarah has shown me all these years.
Lecture 1 introduction to logic
This document defines and explains key concepts in logic and reasoning. It discusses logic as the study of distinguishing correct from incorrect reasoning. It then defines reasoning as using a systematic process of steps and given statements to arrive at a conclusion. It discusses the difference between sentences and propositions, and types of propositions like compound, conjunctive, disjunctive, and conditional propositions. The document also defines deductive and inductive arguments, and how to indicate the type of argument being made.
Useful argumentative essay words and phrases
This document provides a selection of words and phrases that can be used to structure an essay and link ideas. Some of the key phrases included are: moreover, furthermore, and in addition to add more to an existing point; by contrast and alternatively to introduce differing viewpoints; for example and such as to give examples; therefore, as a result, and so to show results or conclusions. The document also includes phrases for quoting sources and introducing them as well as words for listing points and summarizing.
Premises and Conclusions
This document provides a tutorial on identifying premises and conclusions in arguments. It begins by giving examples of premises, conclusions, and argument structure. It then provides tips for distinguishing premises from conclusions, including looking for indicator words and testing statements with "therefore". The rest of the document gives practice identifying premises and conclusions in various arguments, demonstrating the application of the tips.
Deductive And Inductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning involves drawing a logically certain conclusion from general statements or premises, while inductive reasoning involves drawing a probable conclusion based on specific observations or facts. Inductive reasoning is used to make causal inferences or reason by analogy, but the conclusions are not logically certain. Both deductive and inductive reasoning involve areas of the brain associated with working memory and reasoning such as the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia.
Writinga thesisstatement
This document provides guidance on writing thesis statements and developing paragraphs. It defines a thesis statement as a sentence that expresses the main ideas of a paper and answers the question posed. An effective thesis statement has two parts - the topic and an analysis or assertion about the topic. It should be specific and guide the scope of the paper. Argumentative thesis statements present a claim, reasons to support it, and the order of presenting evidence. Topic sentences indicate the general idea of a paragraph. Paragraphs are well-developed by citing evidence, examining testimony, defining terms, comparing/contrasting, and analyzing causes and effects.
Other kinds of essay
This document outlines and defines several types of essays. It discusses definition essays, which aim to deeply analyze the meaning of a specific term. Compare/contrast essays examine the similarities and differences between two or more topics. Cause/effect essays explore how and why events occurred and their resulting impacts. Argumentative essays attempt to persuade the reader of a particular viewpoint. Critical essays analyze the strengths, weaknesses and methods used in another person's work. Other essay types covered include classification, sequence, choice and evaluation essays.
Lsat study session 1 nov. 3
The document provides information about the LSAT exam, which is required for admission to most law schools. It discusses the sections and timing of the exam, average scores needed for acceptance, and common myths and tips. The focus is on the Logical Reasoning section, including what it tests, strategies for answering questions, and identifying conclusions, premises, and determining the strength of arguments. Resources for preparation are also listed.
Dorothea Elizabeth Orem
La teoría de Dorothea Orem se centra en tres conceptos clave: el autocuidado, el déficit de autocuidado y los sistemas de enfermería. La teoría describe cómo las personas requieren estímulos continuos de ellas mismas y su entorno para sobrevivir, y cómo la enfermería ayuda a quienes tienen limitaciones para el autocuidado a través de la provisión de estímulos. La teoría ha guiado la práctica de enfermería y la investigación en diversas áreas.
Methodology of Research - Assumptions and the Research Hypothesis
Methodology of Research Topic IV: The Research Title and Statement of the Problem - Assumptions and the Research Hypothesis
-Assumption defined
-Assumption in Research
-Assumption
-Hypothesis defined
-Importance of Hypothesis in Research
-Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis
-Sources of Hypothesis
-Types of Hypothesis
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
This document discusses limitations, delimitations, assumptions, and defining key terms in research. It notes that limitations point out strengths and weaknesses and should be acknowledged. Limitations constrain generalizability and present opportunities for further research. Delimitations define the scope of the study through choices made about what to include or exclude. Assumptions are things accepted as true that the study relies on. Defining key terms precisely helps avoid misunderstanding.
More Related Content
What's hot
Persuasion argumentation
The document discusses how to craft persuasive arguments. It explains that all arguments appeal to logos, ethos, or pathos. Logos appeals to logic and reason through evidence like facts, statistics, and cause-and-effect relationships. Ethos appeals to the speaker's credibility. Pathos appeals to the audience's emotions by connecting with them and evoking feelings. The document also lists different types of evidence that can be used such as values, expert opinions, statistics, analogies, facts, examples, anecdotes, and traditions.
The reflective essay_final[1]
The document provides information about reflective essays, including what they are, their purpose, and how to structure them. It defines a reflective essay as exploring a topic using personal thoughts and experiences. It recommends organizing a group reflective essay by combining individual reflections in an organized manner following the essay format. It provides guidelines for writing thesis statements, topic sentences, body paragraphs, and conclusions. Examples of an introduction and graphic organizer are also included to illustrate the concepts.
Basic Concepts of Logic
This document provides an overview of basic concepts in logic, including:
- Logic is defined as the science of reasoning, concerned with determining correct vs incorrect reasoning.
- Reasoning involves making inferences by drawing conclusions from premises. Arguments consist of statements where one is the conclusion and the others are premises intended to support the conclusion.
- Logic divides into deductive logic and inductive logic. Deductive logic examines necessarily truth-preserving arguments, while inductive logic examines arguments where the premises make the conclusion probable but not certain.
Understanding and identifying text structure 1
This document discusses text structure and patterns that can help readers understand a text. It provides examples of common text structures such as comparison/contrast, definition, sequence, and location. Signal words are given as clues to help identify each structure. Understanding text structure can help readers comprehend and recall the information presented.
1.2 Recognizing Arguments
This document discusses how to identify and analyze arguments. An argument must have at least one premise and a conclusion. It also discusses different types of statements that are not arguments, such as warnings, advice, opinions, and reports. Conditional statements on their own are not arguments, but can be used as part of an argument. Necessary conditions are required for something to occur, while sufficient conditions alone are enough to trigger something.
Argumentative Writing
This document provides an overview of the key elements of an argumentative essay, including considering the audience, introducing the topic, stating the thesis, providing reasons and evidence to support the position, addressing counterarguments, and concluding by restating the argument. It discusses the importance of the hook, background information, and thesis statement in the introduction and specific elements like position, reasons, evidence, and rebuttal that are needed in the body. The conclusion should restate the argument and can include a prediction or warning. It also provides some potential references on argumentative writing.
Persuasion (Pattern of Development in Reading and Writing)
A persuasive paragraph aims to convince readers to do or believe something. There are three common techniques used in developing a persuasive paragraph: using evidence such as facts, statistics from experts and research; giving examples that are concrete, relevant and reasonable; and attacking opposing views by belittling or dismissing opposing ideas.
Reasoning
1. Reasoning involves creating conclusions from evidence or premises through either inductive or deductive logic.
2. Inductive reasoning creates generalizations from examples while deductive reasoning applies generalizations to specific cases through major and minor premises that lead to a conclusion.
3. Common fallacies in reasoning include false dilemmas, appeals to emotion, slippery slopes, ad hominem attacks, hasty generalizations, and circular or ignorant arguments.
Lesson on patterns of development
This document provides information on paragraph rhetoric models, including describing, defining, classification, compare/contrast, and cause and effect. It discusses how to write paragraphs using these models, with examples for each. Key details covered include using sensory details in descriptive paragraphs, extending dictionary definitions, organizing compare/contrast paragraphs in block or point-by-point format, and establishing direct and indirect causes and effects. The document also reviews patterns of development in writing like narration, description, definition, exemplification, and persuasion.
Patterns of Definition
Here is a 7 sentence paragraph defining friendship:
A friend is someone you can trust and rely on. They are there for you during both good and bad times. My best friend Sarah and I have been friends since elementary school. I remember we used to play together every day after class and tell each other everything. She was always so supportive and caring. Even now as adults, though we don't see each other as much, I know she will always be there if I need her. True friendship is built on loyalty, trust and unconditional support, and that is what Sarah has shown me all these years.
Lecture 1 introduction to logic
This document defines and explains key concepts in logic and reasoning. It discusses logic as the study of distinguishing correct from incorrect reasoning. It then defines reasoning as using a systematic process of steps and given statements to arrive at a conclusion. It discusses the difference between sentences and propositions, and types of propositions like compound, conjunctive, disjunctive, and conditional propositions. The document also defines deductive and inductive arguments, and how to indicate the type of argument being made.
Useful argumentative essay words and phrases
This document provides a selection of words and phrases that can be used to structure an essay and link ideas. Some of the key phrases included are: moreover, furthermore, and in addition to add more to an existing point; by contrast and alternatively to introduce differing viewpoints; for example and such as to give examples; therefore, as a result, and so to show results or conclusions. The document also includes phrases for quoting sources and introducing them as well as words for listing points and summarizing.
Premises and Conclusions
This document provides a tutorial on identifying premises and conclusions in arguments. It begins by giving examples of premises, conclusions, and argument structure. It then provides tips for distinguishing premises from conclusions, including looking for indicator words and testing statements with "therefore". The rest of the document gives practice identifying premises and conclusions in various arguments, demonstrating the application of the tips.
Deductive And Inductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning involves drawing a logically certain conclusion from general statements or premises, while inductive reasoning involves drawing a probable conclusion based on specific observations or facts. Inductive reasoning is used to make causal inferences or reason by analogy, but the conclusions are not logically certain. Both deductive and inductive reasoning involve areas of the brain associated with working memory and reasoning such as the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia.
Writinga thesisstatement
This document provides guidance on writing thesis statements and developing paragraphs. It defines a thesis statement as a sentence that expresses the main ideas of a paper and answers the question posed. An effective thesis statement has two parts - the topic and an analysis or assertion about the topic. It should be specific and guide the scope of the paper. Argumentative thesis statements present a claim, reasons to support it, and the order of presenting evidence. Topic sentences indicate the general idea of a paragraph. Paragraphs are well-developed by citing evidence, examining testimony, defining terms, comparing/contrasting, and analyzing causes and effects.
Other kinds of essay
This document outlines and defines several types of essays. It discusses definition essays, which aim to deeply analyze the meaning of a specific term. Compare/contrast essays examine the similarities and differences between two or more topics. Cause/effect essays explore how and why events occurred and their resulting impacts. Argumentative essays attempt to persuade the reader of a particular viewpoint. Critical essays analyze the strengths, weaknesses and methods used in another person's work. Other essay types covered include classification, sequence, choice and evaluation essays.
What's hot (18)
Persuasion (Pattern of Development in Reading and Writing)
Persuasion (Pattern of Development in Reading and Writing)
Viewers also liked
Lsat study session 1 nov. 3
The document provides information about the LSAT exam, which is required for admission to most law schools. It discusses the sections and timing of the exam, average scores needed for acceptance, and common myths and tips. The focus is on the Logical Reasoning section, including what it tests, strategies for answering questions, and identifying conclusions, premises, and determining the strength of arguments. Resources for preparation are also listed.
Dorothea Elizabeth Orem
La teoría de Dorothea Orem se centra en tres conceptos clave: el autocuidado, el déficit de autocuidado y los sistemas de enfermería. La teoría describe cómo las personas requieren estímulos continuos de ellas mismas y su entorno para sobrevivir, y cómo la enfermería ayuda a quienes tienen limitaciones para el autocuidado a través de la provisión de estímulos. La teoría ha guiado la práctica de enfermería y la investigación en diversas áreas.
Methodology of Research - Assumptions and the Research Hypothesis
Methodology of Research Topic IV: The Research Title and Statement of the Problem - Assumptions and the Research Hypothesis
-Assumption defined
-Assumption in Research
-Assumption
-Hypothesis defined
-Importance of Hypothesis in Research
-Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis
-Sources of Hypothesis
-Types of Hypothesis
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
This document discusses limitations, delimitations, assumptions, and defining key terms in research. It notes that limitations point out strengths and weaknesses and should be acknowledged. Limitations constrain generalizability and present opportunities for further research. Delimitations define the scope of the study through choices made about what to include or exclude. Assumptions are things accepted as true that the study relies on. Defining key terms precisely helps avoid misunderstanding.
Nursing Research Lec. Copy
This document provides definitions and discusses the nature and scope of nursing research. It defines research as a scientific study aimed at discovering facts, revising theories, or applying new facts. The document outlines general purposes of research such as answering questions and solving problems. It also discusses specific purposes like description, exploration, and explanation. The document then discusses research variables, indicators, assumptions, hypotheses, and the importance of clearly defining terms. It provides examples of different types of nursing research and their purposes.
Teoría del défict del autocuidado de Dorothea E. Orem
Dorothea Elizabeth Orem nació en 1914 en Baltimore, Maryland. Desarrolló la Teoría de la Enfermería de Orem (TEDA), publicada por primera vez en 1971. La TEDA incluye tres teorías: la teoría de los sistemas de enfermería, la teoría del déficit de autocuidado y la teoría del autocuidado. La TEDA proporciona un marco para comprender las necesidades de autocuidado de los pacientes y el papel de la enfermera en satisfacer esas necesidades cuando hay un déficit. Orem continu
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking involves clear, logical thinking and the ability to engage in independent analysis. It includes skills like understanding logical connections, evaluating arguments, detecting flaws in reasoning, and solving problems systematically. Someone with strong critical thinking abilities will ask thoughtful questions, assess statements carefully, consider multiple viewpoints, and adjust their views based on new evidence. Writing effective critical thinking questions (CTQs) requires finding a meaningful topic and formulating open-ended questions that get beneath the surface using techniques like Socratic questioning and Bloom's Taxonomy.
Research assumption
This document discusses assumptions in research. It defines assumptions as statements taken as true without proof, and distinguishes them from hypotheses by saying assumptions are beliefs while hypotheses are testable predictions. It outlines several types of assumptions researchers may have, including universal assumptions, those based on theories, and those needed to conduct a study. Examples of assumptions in nursing research are provided, such as people wanting control of their health or health professionals viewing care differently than patients. The document also discusses limitations of research, such as theoretical limitations from specific concepts or methodological limitations from weak designs.
Major theoretical perspectives in sociology
The document outlines three major theoretical perspectives in sociology: [1] structural functionalism, [2] conflict theory, and [3] symbolic interactionism. Structural functionalism views society as a system of interconnected parts that work together, conflict theory sees society as groups competing for scarce resources, and symbolic interactionism examines daily social interactions defined by shared symbols. The perspectives differ in their levels of analysis and views on social change.
Viewers also liked (9)
Methodology of Research - Assumptions and the Research Hypothesis
Methodology of Research - Assumptions and the Research Hypothesis
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
limitations,delimitaions ,assumptions and keywords
Teoría del défict del autocuidado de Dorothea E. Orem
Teoría del défict del autocuidado de Dorothea E. Orem
Similar to 2 2 t4e_chapter_two_powerpoint_new1
Argument terms
This document discusses reasoning and critical thinking skills. It defines reasoning as using the human mind to solve problems, make judgments and decisions, and learn from experience. Reasoning is a tool that can be used well or poorly. The document outlines why reasoning should be studied, such as it being part of human potential and being useful in college and career. However, reasoning must be used carefully with empathy and consideration of deeper feelings and faith. The document also defines key terms related to arguments and reasoning such as premises, conclusions, and logical order. It provides an example argument and discusses evaluating arguments based on justified premises and conclusions implied by the premises.
Contextual practice2033
The document provides an overview of contextual thinking and logical thinking. It defines contextual thinking as evaluating symptoms as part of a complex continuum rather than a specific cause. It also discusses different types of definitions such as descriptive, stipulative, and programmatic definitions. The document further explores logical thinking and fallacies including fallacies of relevance and fallacies of ambiguity. It discusses deductive and inductive reasoning. The remainder of the document outlines various weeks of a course that cover topics like creative thinking, mind mapping, and methods of thinking.
reportingrw.pptx
This document provides information about making inferences and formulating assertions and counterclaims. It is a reading and writing guide created by Group #3, led by Triztan Paul Duran. The document defines key terms like inferences, assertions, and counterclaims. It explains different types of each, such as deductive vs inductive inferences. Steps are provided for making inferences from sources. Guidelines are given for formulating assertions to communicate ideas and support arguments. The importance of counterclaims in debates to challenge assertions is discussed. Types of counterclaims like direct refutations are outlined.
Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypotheses
As researchers working in government, influencing service design, we need to know that our research is methodologically sound, our research findings are grounded in empirical data and our recommendations are logically derived.
'Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypotheses' is the first in a series of 5 short courses, covering introduction courses to various aspects of methodology in research, from the use of grounded theory in discovery research, to hypothesis testing and sampling in more experimental research.
In this course, you'll learn:
About arguments
- what we mean by an argument
- how to identify a valid/invalid argument
- what we mean by premises
- what validity and soundness of arguments mean
About reasoning
- what is deductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is inductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is abductive reasoning and where do we use it
About hypotheses
- what is a hypotheses and a null hypothesis
- how do we test them
Logic
These slides are helpful if you really want to know what actually LOGIC is in business world or prospective.
Analysis - Intro to Arguments
The document discusses arguments and how to identify their key components. An argument is defined as a claim supported by reasons or evidence, called premises, that are intended to prove or support a conclusion. Indicator words can help identify premises and conclusions. While arguments often contain these indicators, some do not, so conclusions must be inferred. The document also distinguishes arguments from non-arguments like reports, unsupported assertions, conditional statements, illustrations, and explanations.
Logic arguments and_fallacies
This document defines and discusses different types of arguments and logical fallacies. It begins by defining deductive and inductive arguments, and explaining how to identify them based on language used. Common types of deductive and inductive arguments are then outlined. The document also discusses the concepts of validity, soundness, and strength as they relate to arguments. Finally, it provides detailed descriptions and examples of many common logical fallacies, categorizing them as fallacies of relevance, weak induction, ambiguity, analogy, or formal fallacies.
Part 1 unit 1 lesson 2 coherence transition between ideas
The document discusses techniques for writing coherent paragraphs and connecting ideas. It begins by defining coherence and explaining that transitional words and phrases establish relationships between sentences by indicating time, spatial, or sequential order. Six categories of transitional elements are described: spatial order, time order, numerical order, cause/effect order, comparison/contrast order, and general/specific order. The document emphasizes that paragraphs need transitional elements to be understandable and coherent, with all sentences arranged in a clear, logical order. It provides examples of transitional words and phrases for different categories.
1.1Arguments, Premises, and ConclusionsHow Logical Are You·.docx
1.1Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
How Logical Are You?
· After a momentary absence, you return to your table in the library only to find your smartphone is missing. It was there just minutes earlier. You suspect the student sitting next to you took it. After all, she has a guilty look. Also, there is a bulge in her backpack about the size of your phone, and one of the pouches has a loose strap. Then you hear a “ring” come from the backpack—and it’s the same ringtone that you use on your phone. Which of these pieces of evidence best supports your suspicion?
Answer
The best evidence is undoubtedly the “ring” you hear coming from her backpack, which is the same ringtone as the one on your phone. The weakest evidence is probably the “guilty look.” After all, what, exactly, is a guilty look? The bulge in the backpack and the loose strap are of medium value. The loose strap supports the hypothesis that something was quickly inserted into the backpack. In this section of the chapter you will learn that evidentiary statements form the premises of arguments.
Logic may be defined as the organized body of knowledge, or science, that evaluates arguments. All of us encounter arguments in our day-to-day experience. We read them in books and newspapers, hear them on television, and formulate them when communicating with friends and associates. The aim of logic is to develop a system of methods and principles that we may use as criteria for evaluating the arguments of others and as guides in constructing arguments of our own. Among the benefits to be expected from the study of logic is an increase in confidence that we are making sense when we criticize the arguments of others and when we advance arguments of our own.
An argument, in its simplest form, is a group of statements, one or more of which (the premises) are claimed to provide support for, or reasons to believe, one of the others (the conclusion). Every argument may be placed in either of two basic groups: those in which the premises really do support the conclusion and those in which they do not, even though they are claimed to. The former are said to be good arguments (at least to that extent), the latter bad arguments. The purpose of logic, as the science that evaluates arguments, is thus to develop methods and techniques that allow us to distinguish good arguments from bad.
As is apparent from the given definition, the term argument has a very specific meaning in logic. It does not mean, for example, a mere verbal fight, as one might have with one’s parent, spouse, or friend. Let us examine the features of this definition in greater detail. First of all, an argument is a group of statements. A statement is a sentence that is either true or false—in other words, typically a declarative sentence or a sentence component that could stand as a declarative sentence. The following sentences are statements:
Chocolate truffles are loaded with calories.
Melatonin helps relieve jet lag.
Political can.
1.1Arguments, Premises, and ConclusionsHow Logical Are You·.docx
1.1Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
How Logical Are You?
· After a momentary absence, you return to your table in the library only to find your smartphone is missing. It was there just minutes earlier. You suspect the student sitting next to you took it. After all, she has a guilty look. Also, there is a bulge in her backpack about the size of your phone, and one of the pouches has a loose strap. Then you hear a “ring” come from the backpack—and it’s the same ringtone that you use on your phone. Which of these pieces of evidence best supports your suspicion?
Answer
The best evidence is undoubtedly the “ring” you hear coming from her backpack, which is the same ringtone as the one on your phone. The weakest evidence is probably the “guilty look.” After all, what, exactly, is a guilty look? The bulge in the backpack and the loose strap are of medium value. The loose strap supports the hypothesis that something was quickly inserted into the backpack. In this section of the chapter you will learn that evidentiary statements form the premises of arguments.
Logic may be defined as the organized body of knowledge, or science, that evaluates arguments. All of us encounter arguments in our day-to-day experience. We read them in books and newspapers, hear them on television, and formulate them when communicating with friends and associates. The aim of logic is to develop a system of methods and principles that we may use as criteria for evaluating the arguments of others and as guides in constructing arguments of our own. Among the benefits to be expected from the study of logic is an increase in confidence that we are making sense when we criticize the arguments of others and when we advance arguments of our own.
An argument, in its simplest form, is a group of statements, one or more of which (the premises) are claimed to provide support for, or reasons to believe, one of the others (the conclusion). Every argument may be placed in either of two basic groups: those in which the premises really do support the conclusion and those in which they do not, even though they are claimed to. The former are said to be good arguments (at least to that extent), the latter bad arguments. The purpose of logic, as the science that evaluates arguments, is thus to develop methods and techniques that allow us to distinguish good arguments from bad.
As is apparent from the given definition, the term argument has a very specific meaning in logic. It does not mean, for example, a mere verbal fight, as one might have with one’s parent, spouse, or friend. Let us examine the features of this definition in greater detail. First of all, an argument is a group of statements. A statement is a sentence that is either true or false—in other words, typically a declarative sentence or a sentence component that could stand as a declarative sentence. The following sentences are statements:
Chocolate truffles are loaded with calories.
Melatonin helps relieve jet lag.
Political can ...
Analysis : Persuasive Discourse
This document discusses and distinguishes between arguments and non-arguments, and outlines key elements of arguments including premises, conclusions, and common argument structures. It defines an argument as a claim defended with reasons, composed of one or more premises and a conclusion. It also discusses deductive arguments, which aim to prove conclusions with logical necessity from premises, and inductive arguments, which claim conclusions that are probable or likely given the premises. Common patterns of deductive reasoning like categorical syllogisms and elimination arguments are described.
The following text material and terms defined at the end comprise .docx
The following text material and terms defined at the end comprise part of what will be asked on the Mid-Term Exam for PHIL 1381.
Logic [excerpt from Stan Baronett, Logic, 2E]
Logic is the study of reasoning. Logic investigates the level of correctness of the reasoning found in arguments. An argument is a group of statements of which one (the conclusion) is claimed to follow from the others (the premises). A statement is a sentence that is either true or false. Every statement is either true or false; these two possibilities are called “truth values.” Premises are statements that contain information intended to provide support or reasons to believe a conclusion. The conclusion is the statement that is claimed to follow from the premises. In order to help recognize arguments, we rely on premise indicator words and phrases, and conclusion indicator words and phrases.
Inference is the term used by logicians to refer to the reasoning process that is expressed by an argument. If a passage expresses a reasoning process—that the conclusion follows from the premises—then we say that it makes an inferential claim. If a passage does not express a reasoning process (explicit or implicit), then it does not make an inferential claim (it is a noninferential passage). One type of noninferential passage is the explanation. An explanation provides reasons for why or how an event occurred. By themselves, explanations are not arguments; however, they can form part of an argument.
There are two types of argument: deductive and inductive. A deductive argument is one in which it is claimed that the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. In other words, it is claimed that under the assumption that the premises are true it is impossible for the conclusion to be false. An inductive argument is one in which it is claimed that the premises make the conclusion probable. In other words, it is claimed that, under the assumption that the premises are true, it is improbable for the conclusion to be false.
Revealing the logical form of a deductive argument helps with logical analysis and evaluation. When we evaluate deductive arguments, we use the following concepts: valid, invalid, sound, and unsound. A valid argument is one where, assuming the premises are true, it is impossible for the conclusion to be false. In other words, the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. An invalid argument is one where, assuming the premises are true, it is possible for the conclusion to be false. In other words, a deductive argument in which the conclusion does not follow necessarily from the premises is an invalid argument. When logical analysis shows that a deductive argument is valid, and when truth value analysis of the premises shows that they are all true, then the argument is sound. If a deductive argument is invalid, or if at least one of the premises is false (truth value analysis), then the argument is unsound.
A counterexample to astatement is evidenc.
Prompt #1 Examples of Inductive InferencePrepare To prepare to.docx
Prompt #1: Examples of Inductive Inference
Prepare
: To prepare to answer this prompt, take another look at Chapter 5 of our book, paying close attention to the names of the various forms of inductive inference.
Types of inductive inference: Appeals to authority, Arguments from Analogy, Inductive Generalizations, Inferences to the Best Explanations, and Statistical Syllogisms
Write
: To answer the prompt, create or find one example each of three different types of inductive inference. Clearly indicate as well which type of inductive inference it is. For each of your arguments, include an analysis of its degree of strength using the evaluative methods we learned in the chapter for that type of argument.
Prompt #2:
One of the most common inferences in life is the inference to the best explanation (sometimes called
abductive reasoning
). We use this type of reasoning to infer what would best explain the things that we see. Chapter 5 in our book demonstrates ways in which this type of reasoning helps us to explain the world around us.
Prepare
: Choose a topic that is difficult or controversial to explain. Some good topics include hoaxes, unusual sightings (e.g. UFOs, bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster), the supernatural or paranormal, events that are the subject of conspiracy theories, unsolved crimes or other court cases, etc.
Reflect
: Do a little research to find a specific topic and learn about explanations on both sides. Consider what you think might best explain the observed facts of the case.
Write
: Explain the topic you chose and why it is interesting or controversial. Present good arguments on more than one side of the issue (e.g. competing explanations of the facts). Analyze both arguments that you have presented. Then present your own argument for your theory that you feel will best explain this phenomenon. Are there any holes in your theory? Is there any information that would be likely to strengthen or weaken your case?
.
Argumentative essay
The document discusses the key elements and structure of an effective argumentative essay. It states that the goal of an argumentative essay is to persuade readers to adopt the writer's point of view on a given issue. A good argumentative essay presents a clear thesis, supporting evidence incorporated from thorough research, consideration of alternative perspectives, and a reasonable conclusion. The document provides guidance on developing logical reasoning, avoiding fallacies, and establishing an organized argument through outlining.
IDENTIFYING REASONS AND CONCLUSION JUNE 10 2022.pdf
The passage describes a situation where a semiconductor manufacturing company plans to bring in 100 workers from Bangladesh who do not speak English or Malay. At a recent production meeting, a local supervisor expressed concern that this could lead to production problems due to miscommunication. The problem statement is to analyze the supervisor's concerns and identify root causes in order to offer suggestions for improvement. This will involve applying critical thinking skills to write an essay addressing the issue, proposing solutions, and drawing a conclusion with references.
Class 19
This document provides information and guidance for students on their upcoming Essay #5 assignment. It outlines important due dates for drafts and the final essay. Students will write a 4-6 page essay examining an intersection between philosophies discussed in class and themes from Game of Thrones, choosing from provided prompts or their own topic. The document offers writing strategies for developing an argument, using evidence to support a thesis, and addressing multiple perspectives respectfully. It encourages outlining and prewriting activities to prepare for the essay.
Lecture 2 arguments
This document provides an introduction to critical thinking and argumentation. It discusses key elements of arguments such as claims, grounds, warrants, backing, and qualifiers. It also introduces argument mapping as a tool to visualize the logical structure of arguments. Additionally, it discusses Stephen Toulmin's model of argument which identifies the core components of arguments and their interrelationships. The document uses examples to illustrate different types of arguments and their structures.
Directions This may be done table format. APA format is requ.docx
Directions: This may be done table format. APA format is required whichever format you choose. A title page, running head, page numbers and three references are required.
A. Identify the normal values for each of the following labs. Consider normal values across gender, race, and age, and pregnancy status, when applicable.
B. Identify clinical indications for obtaining the following labs.
1. List when indicated for routine screens if applicable (for example,the USPSTF recommends screening for chlamydia in sexually active women age 24 years and younger and in older women who are at increased risk for infection, or TSH screening is indicated for newborns. Indications for screening can also include risk factors. For example, ordering cholesterol levels on a patient with HTN or DM.
2. Besides screening,list 1-3 clinical indications for ordering the lab. For example, clinical indications of WBC include
Fever with associated symptoms, weight loss, bone pain with fever, etc.
C. Identify conditions associated with abnormal LOW levels of each of the following labs (if applicable)
D. Identify conditions associated with abnormal HIGH levels of each of the following labs (if applicable)
One good resources for screening recommendations is:
https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Index/browse-recommendations
1. Components on a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel such as (but not limited to) sodium, chloride, potassium, glucose, CO2, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Calcium
2. Renal Function Tests: Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Creatinine, BUN/Cr Ratio, Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
3. Thyroid Function Tests
TSH, Free T4
4. Toxicology
Salicylate toxicity, Acetaminophen, Urine Drug Screen, Blood Alcohol, Carbon Monoxide (CO)
5. For your last category of test. Report screening indications for the chosen test, and some clinical indications for ordering them, normal values/results, and S/Sx associated with high/low or abnormal values when applicable
a. Mammography
On Writing an Ethical Argument Evaluation Paper (PHIL 302)
Topic is Racism between social Classes
Before you begin writing, it is crucial to pick a subject, topic, or a specific argument that interests you. Your paper will be a critical evaluation of the soundness of an argument. If you already have an argument, then you can go on to the next step. If not, you may choose to discuss one from an author you have read, or you may formulate your own. In some courses, you may consider a case study for your paper. In that case you will formulate an argument that purports to defend a resolution to the case. You should note that it is not crucial that you pick an argument with which you agree. It is about equally difficult (or easy) to write a paper opposing an argument as it is to write one supporting it, so you should probably choose an argument that is interesting first.
Your paper will have seven parts:
I. Introduction
II. Position
III. Argument
IV. Justification
A. V ...
The Evaluation ArgumentChapter 14, Practical ArgumentMig.docx
The Evaluation Argument
Chapter 14, Practical Argument
Mignette Dorsey
The Evaluation Argument
• Evaluate – To make a personal, value judgment about something
or someone. Ex. A product, service, program, work of literature,
etc.
• Do we evaluate options before we make decisions? Examples?
• Evaluation Argument (options)
1. Make a positive or negative judgment
2. Assert that someone else’s positive or negative judgment is
inaccurate
3. Comparative analysis where you prove one thing is superior to
another
The Evaluation Argument
• What makes another perceive that your evaluation is fair?
• Addressing the Opposing Point of View
• Evidence of bias (p. 477) – Bias can be detected by tone as evidenced
by word choice
• Criteria for Evaluation:
1. Answer the “why” question related to your assertion: Why are
afternoon classes better than morning classes - or vice versa?
2. Establish a list of criteria you will examine: Alertness, Instructor
accessibility, traffic
The Evaluation Argument
3. Comparing criteria - discuss drawbacks of morning classes versus
advantages of afternoon classes
• See pg. 479 re. Evaluation Argument structure
• Evaluation Grammar: Comparatives and Superlatives – page 484
Pop Quiz: Evaluation Essay
(Answers are on the last slide)
Write true or false for each item below:
1. Offering a solution to the problem of student plagiarism would be a
good topic for an evaluation essay.
2. Word choice is an important consideration in writing an evaluation
essay.
3. Word choice establishes the tone of an essay.
4. Of the five “Ws,” the “why” question is never the focus of an
evaluation essay.
5. When we “evaluate,” we make a value judgment about something
or someone.
Pop Quiz Answers: Evaluation Essay
• 1. False
• 2. True
• 3. True
• 4. False
• 5. True
The Evaluation Argument�Chapter 14, Practical ArgumentThe Evaluation Argument�The Evaluation ArgumentThe Evaluation ArgumentPop Quiz: Evaluation Essay�(Answers are on the last slide)Pop Quiz Answers: Evaluation Essay
Rhetoric, Persuasion,
Argumentation:
The Argumentative Essay
Mignette Dorsey
Engl 1302
What is Rhetoric?
• Rhetoric is the ancient art of
argumentation and discourse. When we
write or speak to convince others of what
we believe, we are "rhetors." When we
analyze the way rhetoric works, we are
"rhetoricians." The earliest known studies
of rhetoric come from the Golden Age,
when philosophers of ancient Greece
discussed logos, ethos, and pathos.
Carson-Newman University
https://web.cn.edu/.../resource rhet.html
https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/logic.html
https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/ethos.html
https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/pathos.html
What is Rhetoric?
• Rhetoric / Persuasion is not only written
discourse. Marketing experts use rhetoric for the
purpose of persuading audiences to pay
attention to what they are selling. See
Google>advertisements>images
• Architects use rhetoric in building design.
Consider the message co.
The Evaluation ArgumentChapter 14, Practical ArgumentMig.docx
The Evaluation Argument
Chapter 14, Practical Argument
Mignette Dorsey
The Evaluation Argument
• Evaluate – To make a personal, value judgment about something
or someone. Ex. A product, service, program, work of literature,
etc.
• Do we evaluate options before we make decisions? Examples?
• Evaluation Argument (options)
1. Make a positive or negative judgment
2. Assert that someone else’s positive or negative judgment is
inaccurate
3. Comparative analysis where you prove one thing is superior to
another
The Evaluation Argument
• What makes another perceive that your evaluation is fair?
• Addressing the Opposing Point of View
• Evidence of bias (p. 477) – Bias can be detected by tone as evidenced
by word choice
• Criteria for Evaluation:
1. Answer the “why” question related to your assertion: Why are
afternoon classes better than morning classes - or vice versa?
2. Establish a list of criteria you will examine: Alertness, Instructor
accessibility, traffic
The Evaluation Argument
3. Comparing criteria - discuss drawbacks of morning classes versus
advantages of afternoon classes
• See pg. 479 re. Evaluation Argument structure
• Evaluation Grammar: Comparatives and Superlatives – page 484
Pop Quiz: Evaluation Essay
(Answers are on the last slide)
Write true or false for each item below:
1. Offering a solution to the problem of student plagiarism would be a
good topic for an evaluation essay.
2. Word choice is an important consideration in writing an evaluation
essay.
3. Word choice establishes the tone of an essay.
4. Of the five “Ws,” the “why” question is never the focus of an
evaluation essay.
5. When we “evaluate,” we make a value judgment about something
or someone.
Pop Quiz Answers: Evaluation Essay
• 1. False
• 2. True
• 3. True
• 4. False
• 5. True
The Evaluation Argument�Chapter 14, Practical ArgumentThe Evaluation Argument�The Evaluation ArgumentThe Evaluation ArgumentPop Quiz: Evaluation Essay�(Answers are on the last slide)Pop Quiz Answers: Evaluation Essay
Rhetoric, Persuasion,
Argumentation:
The Argumentative Essay
Mignette Dorsey
Engl 1302
What is Rhetoric?
• Rhetoric is the ancient art of
argumentation and discourse. When we
write or speak to convince others of what
we believe, we are "rhetors." When we
analyze the way rhetoric works, we are
"rhetoricians." The earliest known studies
of rhetoric come from the Golden Age,
when philosophers of ancient Greece
discussed logos, ethos, and pathos.
Carson-Newman University
https://web.cn.edu/.../resource rhet.html
https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/logic.html
https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/ethos.html
https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/pathos.html
What is Rhetoric?
• Rhetoric / Persuasion is not only written
discourse. Marketing experts use rhetoric for the
purpose of persuading audiences to pay
attention to what they are selling. See
Google>advertisements>images
• Architects use rhetoric in building design.
Consider the message co.
Similar to 2 2 t4e_chapter_two_powerpoint_new1 (20)
Part 1 unit 1 lesson 2 coherence transition between ideas
Part 1 unit 1 lesson 2 coherence transition between ideas
1.1Arguments, Premises, and ConclusionsHow Logical Are You·.docx
1.1Arguments, Premises, and ConclusionsHow Logical Are You·.docx
1.1Arguments, Premises, and ConclusionsHow Logical Are You·.docx
1.1Arguments, Premises, and ConclusionsHow Logical Are You·.docx
The following text material and terms defined at the end comprise .docx
The following text material and terms defined at the end comprise .docx
Prompt #1 Examples of Inductive InferencePrepare To prepare to.docx
Prompt #1 Examples of Inductive InferencePrepare To prepare to.docx
IDENTIFYING REASONS AND CONCLUSION JUNE 10 2022.pdf
IDENTIFYING REASONS AND CONCLUSION JUNE 10 2022.pdf
Directions This may be done table format. APA format is requ.docx
Directions This may be done table format. APA format is requ.docx
The Evaluation ArgumentChapter 14, Practical ArgumentMig.docx
The Evaluation ArgumentChapter 14, Practical ArgumentMig.docx
The Evaluation ArgumentChapter 14, Practical ArgumentMig.docx
The Evaluation ArgumentChapter 14, Practical ArgumentMig.docx
More from sagebennet
Existentialism sartre etc.-
Existentialism was concerned with radical freedom, the nature of being, and responsibility. Key figures included Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Martin Heidegger, and Edmund Husserl. Sartre believed that existence precedes essence, meaning humans define themselves through their actions rather than having a predetermined nature. For Sartre, people are condemned to be free without excuses or God, resulting in anguish over absolute responsibility. De Beauvoir applied existentialist thought to feminism, arguing that womanhood is a social construct used to oppress women. Phenomenology focused on investigating conscious experiences without assumptions, while Heidegger explored the question of being and our tendency to get lost
New thought
New Thought is a distinctively American religious movement that began in the 19th century based on the ideas that thoughts can create reality and healing. It emphasizes the power of the mind in areas like intuition, spiritual healing, and creating one's own reality through affirmative prayer and meditation. Some key figures in the development of New Thought include Ralph Waldo Emerson, Phineas Quimby, Mary Baker Eddy, and Ernest Holmes. The document contrasts the concepts of visualization, which uses premeditated ideas, and visioning, which tries to let visions come without preconceptions in order to be pulled by a higher vision.
15 2 t4echapter15_powerpoint(2)
The document provides an overview of legal reasoning skills and the LSAT exam. It discusses the range of legal reasoning skills, including analyzing arguments and precedents. It explains how precedents from previous similar cases can help or hinder new cases. It also outlines the four sections of the LSAT exam and provides tips for the reading comprehension and analytical reasoning sections.
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
The document discusses different types of logical relationships between categorical propositions:
1) Contraries are propositions that cannot both be true but could both be false, with one being necessarily false if the other is true.
2) Subcontraries are propositions that cannot both be false but could both be true, with one being necessarily true if the other is false.
3) Contradictories are propositions that cannot both be true or both be false.
It also discusses inferences that can be drawn between categorical propositions, including subalternation, obversion, conversion, and contraposition.
10b 2 t4_powerpoint_new
The document discusses different types of logical relationships between categorical propositions:
1) Contraries are propositions that cannot both be true but could both be false, with one being necessarily false if the other is true.
2) Subcontraries are propositions that cannot both be false but could both be true, with one being necessarily true if the other is false.
3) Contradictories are propositions that cannot both be true or both be false.
It also discusses inferences that can be drawn between categorical propositions, including subalternation, obversion, conversion, and contraposition.
10a chaptertenpowerpoint new
The document discusses various rules of inference used in deductive reasoning. It defines validity and provides examples of valid argument forms like modus ponens, modus tollens, hypothetical syllogism, and disjunctive syllogism. It also discusses fallacies like affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent that invalidate arguments despite having true premises. The document aims to explain logical reasoning tools to evaluate arguments.
8 chapter eightpowerpoint
This document summarizes key concepts in causal and statistical reasoning. It discusses cause and effect relationships, associations versus causal relationships, and fallacies involving false correlations. It also outlines philosopher John Stuart Mill's methods for determining causation, including the method of agreement, method of difference, joint method, and method of concomitant variation. Finally, it discusses aspects of statistical studies such as sample size, diversity, and margin of error, as well as the forms and strength of statistical arguments.
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
The document discusses syllogisms, which are logical arguments with two premises and a conclusion. It defines the key components of a syllogism, including terms, validity, categorical propositions, and the four figures or patterns that a syllogism can take. Rules for syllogisms are also outlined, such as that the middle term must be distributed at least once and premises and conclusions must align in terms of positive and negative forms.
3 -2 t4-chapter_three_powerpoint_w_teays
This document provides guidance on analyzing arguments and articles through critical thinking. It discusses evaluating evidence, including facts, testimony, statistics, and different types of reasoning. It provides a checklist for weighing evidence and outlines how to structure an analysis. Key points include examining an argument's thesis, approach, claims, and quality of support, as well as looking for bias, assumptions, and weaknesses in the reasoning. The goal is to assess how convincingly the case is made and determine if it is persuasive.
14b 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint
The document provides guidance on critically analyzing popular culture works through examining both their context and content. It emphasizes the importance of considering the context, such as the intended audience, socio-political climate, and any corporate or ideological influences. When assessing the content, it recommends analyzing elements like genre, plot, characters, narrative elements, and interpreting different levels of meaning. The tools outlined help readers develop a sophisticated understanding of popular culture.
7 2 t4_chaptersevenpowerpoint
This document provides an overview of common types of fallacies, which are misleading or deceptive arguments. It discusses four major categories of fallacies: fallacies of relevance, fallacies of presumption, fallacies of ambiguity, and formal fallacies. For each category, it provides examples and explanations of specific fallacies such as ad hominem attacks, slippery slope arguments, equivocation, affirming the consequent, and more.
14b 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint
The document provides guidance on critically analyzing popular culture works through examining both their context and content. It emphasizes the importance of considering the context, such as the intended audience, socio-political climate, and any underlying agendas. When assessing the content, it recommends analyzing elements like genre, plot, characters, narrative impact, and levels of interpretation. The tools outlined help readers look beneath the surface and draw meaningful insights about the influences and reflections of society within various popular works.
5 2 t4e_chapter_fivepowerpoint
This document provides an overview of deductive and inductive reasoning, including the key differences between the two. It defines deductive arguments as those where the premises are sufficient to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. Inductive arguments, on the other hand, can only provide partial or probabilistic support for the conclusion because there is always a "wedge of doubt" between the premises and conclusion. The document also outlines different types of deductive arguments like categorical syllogisms and modus ponens, as well as examples of inductive arguments involving predictions, cause and effect, analogy, and statistics.
14a 2 t4_chapterfourteenpowerpoint_new
This document discusses the important role that journalists play in society by reporting news and analyzing issues in historical and political context. It warns against "tabloidism" and focuses too much on sensational stories rather than more significant issues. The document also emphasizes that a free press is vital for a democratic society by presenting a range of perspectives to help citizens become informed and think for themselves.
6 2 t4_chaptersixpowerpoint
The document discusses the use and analysis of analogical reasoning. It explains that an argument from analogy compares two things based on similarities to assert that a characteristic true of one thing is also true of the other. Analogies are commonly used in law, where previous cases set precedents that lawyers and judges use to reason about new cases. The document provides guidance on analyzing analogies, including identifying similarities and differences, and assessing whether an analogy is strong or weak based on the relative weight of the similarities versus differences. It also discusses how hypothetical scenarios are used in legal training to prepare students for analogical reasoning in applying laws and precedents to new cases.
13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential deception from websites, blogs, and wikis and emphasizes the need to approach online information with care and scrutiny.
13 2 t4e_chapterthirteen_powerpointw_teays
The document discusses how to critically evaluate information found on the internet. It provides tips for assessing the credibility of websites and content, including checking the author's credentials, purpose of the content, currency of information, and use of evidence and citations. It also warns about potential inaccuracies or biases that can exist in blogs, wikis, and other open content due to a lack of oversight or verification of author qualifications.
12 2 t4_chaptertwelvepowerpointw_teays
The document discusses advertising techniques and assumptions. It analyzes how ads today are more subtle and sophisticated than in the past. Ads routinely make assumptions about consumers' needs, desires, fears and prejudices. Key fallacies used in advertising include appeals to popularity, improper appeals to authority, accentuating words to distort meaning, presenting only two choices when more exist, and creating ambiguities through double meanings. Effective ads use shame, optimism, solutions and rationales to sell products by addressing perceived problems.
4 2 t4_chapterfourpowerpoint
The document discusses different types of logical propositions and logical connectives. It defines propositions, tautologies, contradictions, and contingent claims. It then explains the different types of compound propositions using logical connectives such as conjunctions, disjunctions, negations, conditionals, and biconditionals. Various logical forms are also summarized, such as categorical propositions, Demorgan's laws, transposition, material implication, exportation, and equivalence.
11 2 t4_chapter11powerpoint
The document discusses the power and importance of language. It explains that language can be used to describe, define concepts, and shape cultural norms. Descriptions, definitions, and acceptable language can vary based on context and culture. Language can also be used to mislead through ambiguity, loaded words, propaganda, and hate speech. However, language also has the power to transform society for good when used to inspire, uplift, and call people to action for positive change.
More from sagebennet (20)
Recently uploaded
Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process – HemiSync(1).PDF
This paper analyses and assesses the process of Gateway methods of excercise
一比一原版(McGill毕业证书)麦吉尔大学毕业证如何办理
学校原件一模一样【微信：6496090 】【(McGill毕业证书)麦吉尔大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：6496090 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微6496090
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微6496090】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微6496090】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(McGill毕业证书)麦吉尔大学毕业证【微信：6496090 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(McGill毕业证书)麦吉尔大学毕业证【微信：6496090 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(McGill毕业证书)麦吉尔大学毕业证【微信：6496090 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(McGill毕业证书)麦吉尔大学毕业证【微信：6496090 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
Care Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdf
SunDaze Surf offers top swimwear tips: choose high-quality, UV-protective fabrics to shield your skin. Opt for secure fits that withstand waves and active movement. Bright colors enhance visibility, while adjustable straps ensure comfort. Prioritize styles with good support, like racerbacks or underwire tops, for active beach days. Always rinse swimwear after use to maintain fabric integrity.
MRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANE
Amruthaa Uttam Jagdhane, a stunning woman from Pune, has won the esteemed title of Mrs. India 2024, which is given out by the Dk Exhibition. Her journey to this prestigious accomplishment is a confirmation of her faithful assurance, extraordinary gifts, and profound commitment to enabling women.
The Fascinating World of Bats: Unveiling the Secrets of the Night
The Fascinating World of Bats: Unveiling the Secrets of the Night
Bats, the mysterious creatures of the night, have long been a source of fascination and fear for humans. With their eerie squeaks and fluttering wings, they have captured our imagination and sparked our curiosity. Yet, beyond the myths and legends, bats are fascinating creatures that play a vital role in our ecosystem.
There are over 1,300 species of bats, ranging from the tiny Kitti's hog-nosed bat to the majestic flying foxes. These winged mammals are found in almost every corner of the globe, from the scorching deserts to the lush rainforests. Their diversity is a testament to their adaptability and resilience.
Bats are insectivores, feeding on a vast array of insects, from mosquitoes to beetles. A single bat can consume up to 1,200 insects in an hour, making them a crucial part of our pest control system. By preying on insects that damage crops, bats save the agricultural industry billions of dollars each year.
But bats are not just useful; they are also fascinating creatures. Their ability to fly in complete darkness, using echolocation to navigate and hunt, is a remarkable feat of evolution. They are also social animals, living in colonies and communicating with each other through a complex system of calls and body language.
Despite their importance, bats face numerous threats, from habitat destruction to climate change. Many species are endangered, and conservation efforts are necessary to protect these magnificent creatures.
In conclusion, bats are more than just creatures of the night; they are a vital part of our ecosystem, playing a crucial role in maintaining the balance of nature. By learning more about these fascinating animals, we can appreciate their importance and work to protect them for generations to come. So, let us embrace the beauty and mystery of bats, and celebrate their unique place in our world.
thrifthands-thrift store- get the latest trends
Get the latest trends & designer brands at unbeatable prices with Thrift stores. Elevate your style affordably.
Types of Garage Doors Explained: Energy Efficiency, Style, and More
At Affordable Garage Door Repair, we specialize in both residential and commercial garage door services, ensuring your property is secure and your doors are running smoothly.
Self-Discipline: The Secret Weapon for Certain Victory
Amid the constant barrage of distractions and dwindling motivation, self-discipline emerges as the unwavering beacon that guides individuals toward triumph. This vital quality serves as the key to unlocking one’s true potential, whether the aspiration is to attain personal goals, ascend the career ladder, or refine everyday habits.
Understanding Self-Discipline
Biography and career history of Bruno Amezcua
Bruno Amezcua's entry into the film and visual arts world seemed predestined. His grandfather, a distinguished film editor from the 1950s through the 1970s, profoundly influenced him. This familial mentorship early on exposed him to the nuances of film production and a broad array of fine arts, igniting a lifelong passion for narrative creation. Over 15 years, Bruno has engaged in diverse projects showcasing his dedication to the arts.
Insanony: Watch Instagram Stories Secretly - A Complete Guide
Welcome to the world of social media, where Instagram reigns supreme! Today, we're going to explore a fascinating tool called Insanony that lets you watch Instagram Stories secretly. If you've ever wanted to view someone's story without them knowing, this blog is for you. We'll delve into everything you need to know about Insanony with Trending Blogers!
Recently uploaded (11)
Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process – HemiSync(1).PDF
Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process – HemiSync(1).PDF
The Fascinating World of Bats: Unveiling the Secrets of the Night
The Fascinating World of Bats: Unveiling the Secrets of the Night
Types of Garage Doors Explained: Energy Efficiency, Style, and More
Types of Garage Doors Explained: Energy Efficiency, Style, and More
Self-Discipline: The Secret Weapon for Certain Victory
Self-Discipline: The Secret Weapon for Certain Victory
Insanony: Watch Instagram Stories Secretly - A Complete Guide
Insanony: Watch Instagram Stories Secretly - A Complete Guide
2 2 t4e_chapter_two_powerpoint_new1
- 1. Chapter Two Nuts and Bolts: The Basics of Argument Second Thoughts, 4 th ed. Wanda Teays McGraw-Hill Higher Ed. © 2010.Wanda Teays.All rights reserved.