SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 83
Cancer of the Esophagus 
www.aboutcancer.com
2014 Data for Esophagus 
Cancer 
New Cases Cancer Deaths 
18,170 (1.1%) #19 15,450 (2.6% ) 
Life Time Risk of developing this cancer is 
0.5% 
5 Year Survival Rate is 17.5%
Incidence and Mortality over the Last 
30 Years for Esophagus Cancer
Trends in 5 Year Survival Rates for 
Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus
Esophagus Cancer by Gender 
in 2014 
16000 
14000 
12000 
10000 
8000 
6000 
4000 
2000 
0 
Gender 
Male 
Female 
14,660 
3,510 
81% 
19%
Esophagus Cancer Median Age 
at Diagnosis 
Year of Data Male Female 
1998 – 2002 68 73 
2000 - 2004 67 73 
2002 – 2006 67 73 
2005 – 2009 66 72
Age – Adjusted SEER Incidence 
Rates for 2000 - 2011 
25 
20 
15 
10 
5 
0 
Age 20-49 Age 50 - 64 Age 65-74 Age 75 + 
Rates per 100,00
In the US where there is no routine screening 
for esophagus cancer, most patients present 
with advanced stages 
Nearly 50% are advanced beyond local-regional 
Less than 60% with local-regional can 
undergo a curative resection 
70-80%of resected specimens show spread 
to the lymph nodes
National Data 2004-2010 
Esophagus Cancer from SEER 
Stage Incidence Survival/5y 
Local 21% 39.6% 
Regional 30% 21.1% 
Distant 37% 3.8%
Risk Factors 
• Tobacco use. 
• Heavy alcohol use. 
• Barrett esophagus 
• Older age. 
• Being male. 
• Being African-American.
Two most common forms of esophageal 
cancer are named for the type of cells that 
become malignant 
Squamous cell carcinoma forms in squamous 
cells, the thin, flat cells lining the esophagus. 
This cancer is most often found in the upper 
and middle part of the esophagus 
Adenocarcinoma begins 
in glandular (secretory) cells. Glandular cells in 
the lining of the esophagus produce and 
release fluids such as mucus. 
Adenocarcinomas usually form in the lower part 
of the esophagus, near the stomach.
In the 1960’s squamous cancer accounted for 
more than 90% of cases but over the last two 
decades adenocarcinoma has dramatically 
increased and is now over 60% in the US 
Tumors at the esophagogastric junction and 
proximal 5 cm of the stomach that extend into 
the EGJ or esophagus are classified and staged 
as esophageal cancers (the so-called Siewert III 
EGJ tumors). 
All other tumors with an epicenter in the 
stomach >5 cm from the EGJ, or those within 5 
cm or the EGJ without extension into the 
esophagus are staged as gastric cancers.
Squamous Cancer 
• Now only accounts for less than 
30% of cases in the US 
• Tobacco and Alcohol are the 
major risk factors
Adenocarcinoma 
• now most common type in the US, esp in 
white men 
• Obesity and a high Body Mass Index 
(BMI) are high risk factors, very high BMI 
risk is 7.6 X higher 
• GERD (gastroesophageal reflux) high 
risk 
• Barrett’s esophagus increases the risk to 
30 – 60 X higher
Trends in the US for Esophagus 
Cancer 
Adenocarcinoma white males 
Squamous white males 
Adenocarcinoma black males 
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Trends for Adenocarcinoma in the US 
White males 
Black males 
White females Black females 
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Epidemiology of Esophagus Cancer in the US 
Squamous Adenocarcinoma 
New cases per Year ~ 7,000 ~10,000 
Male : Female 3:1 7:1 
Black : White 6:1 1:4 
Most Common Site Middle Distal 
Major Risk Factor Smoking, alcohol Barrett’s
Barrett’s Esophagus – Columnar Cells Extend Above the GE Junction
Barrett’s Esophagus 
• Replacement of normal esophageal lining 
cells (stratified squamous) with cells that 
predispose to cancer (metaplastic columnar 
epithelium) 
• Due to chronic GERD (gastroesophageal 
reflux) 
• Median age at diagnosis is 55y 
• Predisposed to getting adenocarcinoma of 
the lower esophagus
Barrett’s and Cancer 
• Estimates of the annual cancer incidence 
in patients with Barrett's esophagus have 
ranged from 0.1 to 2.0 percent. 
• Although the risk of developing 
esophageal cancer is increased at least 
30-fold above that of the general 
population, the absolute risk of 
developing cancer is low.
Barrett’s and Cancer 
• Cancer incidence was 6.3 per 1000 person-years. 
When only studies with well defined 
criteria for the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus 
were included, the rate was 5.0 per 1000 
person-years. 
• For high-grade dysplasia the corresponding 
pooled estimate for cancer incidence was 10.2 
per 1000 person-years. 
• The incidence of mortality was 3.0 per 1000 
person-years due to esophageal 
adenocarcinoma and 37.1 per 1000 person-years 
due to other causes.
Screening for Barrett’s from the AGA 
(American Gastroenterological Association) 
Age 50 years or older 
Male sex 
White race 
Chronic GERD 
Hiatal hernia 
Elevated body mass index 
Intra-abdominal distribution of body fat
Screening for Barrett’s from the ACP 
(American College of Physicians) 
In men older than 50y with GERD symptoms 
for more than 5 years plus: 
Nocturnal reflux symptoms 
Hiatus hernia 
Elevated body mass index 
Tobacco use 
Intra-abdominal distribution of fat
Signs and Symptoms of 
Esophagus Cancer 
• Difficulty and pain with swallowing 
• Pressure or burning in the chest 
• Indigestion or heartburn 
• Vomiting 
• Frequent choking on food 
• Unexplained weight loss 
• Coughing or hoarseness 
• Pain behind the breastbone or in the 
throat
Esophagus Anatomy 
23- 25 cm from 
pharynx to the 
stomach. Often 
locations are 
measured form the 
teeth at the time of 
endoscopy and the 
first 15 cm are 
before the 
esophagus begins.
The esophagus is 
roughly from C6 to T11
Primary Site Based on 
Proximal Edge of Tumor 
Anatomic Esophageal Distance 
name location from teeth 
Cervical Upper 15 to < 20cm 
Thoracic Upper 20 to < 25cm 
Middle 25 to < 30cm 
Lower 30 to < 40cm 
Abdominal Lower 40 to 45 cm 
EGJ/Cardia 40 to 45 cm
Lymph nodes 
from the 
esophagus
Lymph Nodes at Risk for GE 
junction
Staging and Diagnostic 
Studies
Accuracy in Identifying Lymph Node 
Spread, Comparing CT with EUS 
(endoscopic ultrasound) or EUS + FNA (fine 
needle aspirate biopsy) 
Test Sensitivity Specificity 
CT 29% (17 – 44%) 89% (72 – 98%) 
EUS 71% (56 – 83%) 79% (59 – 92%) 
EUS + FNA 83% (70- 93%) 93% (77 – 99%)
Endoscopic Ultrasound and 
Peri-esophageal Lymph Nodes 
Benign Malignant
Sensitivity in Detecting Nodes/ 
Mets 
Test Site Sensitivity Specificity 
EUS celiac N 85% 96% 
other N 80% 70% 
CT regional N 50% 83% 
abdom N 42% 93% 
Mets 52% 91% 
PET regional N 57% 85% 
Mets 71% 93%
Cross Section Anatomy 
Heart 
Esophagus 
Lung 
Lung
Cross Section Anatomy of the Esophagus
Cross Section Anatomy of the Chest
Reading a CT Scan near the Esophagus
Normal CT of the Esophagus
CT Squamous Cancer in the 
Upper Esophagus
CT Adenocarcinoma Lower 
Esophagus
CT and PET Scan 
CT Scan PET Scan
PET Scan: Large Squamous Cancer of the 
Upper Esophagus
PET Scan Mid Esophagus 
Cancer
PET Scan Lower Esophagus Cancer
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Staging System: T N M 
T = depth of the tumor into the wall of the 
esophagus 
N = number of lymph nodes spread 
M = distant metastases (spread to other 
parts of the body)
Layers of 
the 
Esophagus
Layers of the Esophagus 
epithelium 
Lamina propria 
Muscularis mucosa 
Submucosa 
Muscularis 
propria 
Adventitia
Layers of the Esophagus 
g. Stratified epithelial lining 
f. Mucous membrane 
e. Muscularis mucosa 
d. submucosa 
c. Transverse muscle 
b. Longitudinal muscle 
a. Fibrous covering
Layers of the Esophagus 
Mucosa 
Submucosa 
Muscle 
Epithelial 
Lamina 
Propria 
Muscular 
mucosa
Epithelial 
Basement 
Membrane 
Lamina Propria 
Muscular mucosa 
Layers of the Mucosa 
T is = epithelial only 
T1a = through the 
basement membrane 
into lamina propria or 
muscularis mucosa 
T1b = into submucosa 
Submucosa
Layers of the Esophagus 
Muscle 
Mucosa 
Submucosa
T = Tumor
N = Nodes , M = 
Metastases
Staging System, T and N for 
Esophagus Cancer 
Tis T1 
T1 
submucosal 
intramucosal 
aorta 
T3 T4 
T2 
N0 
N1 
1-2 nodes 
Mucosa 
N2 
3-6 nodes 
N3 
7+nodes 
Submucosa 
Muscularis 
propria
Survival by Stage NCDB 
National Data 2003- 2006 
Stage Number Survival/5y 
I 3,786 (12%) 47.6% 
II 7,324 (24%) 25.1% 
III 7,444 (24%) 13.8% 
IV 11,975 (39%) 3.3%
Squamous Cancer – Survival after Esophagectomy 
Years 
Stage 0 
Stage I 
Stage II 
Stage III
Squamous Cancer – Survival after Esophagectomy 
Stage Ia 
Stage 0 
Stage Ib 
Stage IIA 
Stage IIB 
Stage IIIA 
Stage IIIB 
Stage IIIC
Squamous Cancer 
Survival after Esophagectomy 
Stage 5 Y 10 Y 
I 62% 51% 
Ia 71% 58% 
Ib 60% 50% 
II 47% 37% 
IIa 53% 43% 
IIb 42% 33% 
III 20% 16% 
IIIa 25% 20% 
IIIb 17% 14% 
IIIc 14% 12%
Adenocarcinoma – Survival after Esophagectomy 
Years 
Stage 0 
Stage I 
Stage II 
Stage III
Adenocarcinoma – Survival after Esophagectomy 
Years 
Stage 0 
Stage IA 
Stage IB 
Stage IIA 
Stage IIB 
Stage IIIA 
Stage IIIB 
Stage IIIC
Adenocarcinoma 
Survival after Esophagectomy 
Stage 5y 10Y 
I 73% 61% 
Ia 77% 67% 
Ib 63% 51% 
II 41% 33% 
IIa 50% 37% 
IIb 40% 30% 
III 20% 17% 
IIIa 25% 20% 
IIIb 17% 14% 
IIIc 13% 12%
Cancer of the Esophagus 
www.aboutcancer.com

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Pancreas Cancer
Pancreas CancerPancreas Cancer
Pancreas Cancer
 
Esophageal cancer
Esophageal cancerEsophageal cancer
Esophageal cancer
 
carcinoma of stomach
 carcinoma of  stomach carcinoma of  stomach
carcinoma of stomach
 
Esophageal cancer
Esophageal cancer Esophageal cancer
Esophageal cancer
 
Pancreatic cancer
Pancreatic cancerPancreatic cancer
Pancreatic cancer
 
Chronic pancreatitis
Chronic pancreatitisChronic pancreatitis
Chronic pancreatitis
 
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal cancerColorectal cancer
Colorectal cancer
 
Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal CancerColorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
 
Gastric cancer
Gastric cancerGastric cancer
Gastric cancer
 
Ca rectum
Ca rectumCa rectum
Ca rectum
 
Gastric cancer
Gastric cancerGastric cancer
Gastric cancer
 
Cancer colon
Cancer colon   Cancer colon
Cancer colon
 
Barretts oesophagus
Barretts oesophagusBarretts oesophagus
Barretts oesophagus
 
Esophageal Carcinoma
Esophageal CarcinomaEsophageal Carcinoma
Esophageal Carcinoma
 
Gastric cancer
Gastric cancerGastric cancer
Gastric cancer
 
Cancer of the Bladder
Cancer of the BladderCancer of the Bladder
Cancer of the Bladder
 
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepatocellular carcinoma
 
Cancer of the esophagus
Cancer of the esophagusCancer of the esophagus
Cancer of the esophagus
 
Carcinoma of esophagus
Carcinoma of esophagusCarcinoma of esophagus
Carcinoma of esophagus
 
Bladder carcinoma
Bladder carcinomaBladder carcinoma
Bladder carcinoma
 

Similar to Esophagus cancer

gastriccancer-160627133725.pdf
gastriccancer-160627133725.pdfgastriccancer-160627133725.pdf
gastriccancer-160627133725.pdf
Khalidfadol
 
gastric adenocarcinoma
gastric adenocarcinoma gastric adenocarcinoma
gastric adenocarcinoma
moe100100
 

Similar to Esophagus cancer (20)

esophaguscancer
esophaguscanceresophaguscancer
esophaguscancer
 
gastriccancer-160627133725.pdf
gastriccancer-160627133725.pdfgastriccancer-160627133725.pdf
gastriccancer-160627133725.pdf
 
Carcinoma rectum-radiotherapy perspective
 Carcinoma rectum-radiotherapy perspective Carcinoma rectum-radiotherapy perspective
Carcinoma rectum-radiotherapy perspective
 
Cancer of the Colon
Cancer of the  ColonCancer of the  Colon
Cancer of the Colon
 
Gastric Carcinoma
Gastric CarcinomaGastric Carcinoma
Gastric Carcinoma
 
Ca esophagus by amos.pptx
Ca esophagus by amos.pptxCa esophagus by amos.pptx
Ca esophagus by amos.pptx
 
Oesophageal carcinoma
Oesophageal carcinomaOesophageal carcinoma
Oesophageal carcinoma
 
Esopageal cancer ,
Esopageal cancer ,Esopageal cancer ,
Esopageal cancer ,
 
Gastrointestinal cancer
Gastrointestinal cancerGastrointestinal cancer
Gastrointestinal cancer
 
gastrointestinalcancer.pptx
gastrointestinalcancer.pptxgastrointestinalcancer.pptx
gastrointestinalcancer.pptx
 
11 esophageal cancer
11 esophageal cancer11 esophageal cancer
11 esophageal cancer
 
Cancer Oesophagus.pptx
Cancer Oesophagus.pptxCancer Oesophagus.pptx
Cancer Oesophagus.pptx
 
1GASTRIC_CARCINOMA.ppt
1GASTRIC_CARCINOMA.ppt1GASTRIC_CARCINOMA.ppt
1GASTRIC_CARCINOMA.ppt
 
Gasric cancer
Gasric cancerGasric cancer
Gasric cancer
 
gastric adenocarcinoma
gastric adenocarcinoma gastric adenocarcinoma
gastric adenocarcinoma
 
WORK UP A CASE OF Endometrial cancer .ppt
WORK UP A CASE OF Endometrial cancer .pptWORK UP A CASE OF Endometrial cancer .ppt
WORK UP A CASE OF Endometrial cancer .ppt
 
Oesophageal carcinoma
Oesophageal carcinomaOesophageal carcinoma
Oesophageal carcinoma
 
Carcinomarectum 111113085726-phpapp01
Carcinomarectum 111113085726-phpapp01Carcinomarectum 111113085726-phpapp01
Carcinomarectum 111113085726-phpapp01
 
colon ca.pptx
colon ca.pptxcolon ca.pptx
colon ca.pptx
 
KaraCancer.pptx cancer epidemiology presentation
KaraCancer.pptx cancer epidemiology presentationKaraCancer.pptx cancer epidemiology presentation
KaraCancer.pptx cancer epidemiology presentation
 

More from Robert J Miller MD

More from Robert J Miller MD (20)

2022 Radiation for Common Cancers
2022 Radiation for Common Cancers2022 Radiation for Common Cancers
2022 Radiation for Common Cancers
 
Understanding advance directives
Understanding advance directivesUnderstanding advance directives
Understanding advance directives
 
What’s new in prostate cancer part 2, 2021
What’s new in prostate cancer part 2, 2021What’s new in prostate cancer part 2, 2021
What’s new in prostate cancer part 2, 2021
 
What’s new in prostate cancer part 1, 2021
What’s new in prostate cancer part 1, 2021What’s new in prostate cancer part 1, 2021
What’s new in prostate cancer part 1, 2021
 
Smoking and lung cancer and now Covid
Smoking and lung cancer and now CovidSmoking and lung cancer and now Covid
Smoking and lung cancer and now Covid
 
Music and Aging
Music and AgingMusic and Aging
Music and Aging
 
Breast cancer 2021
Breast cancer 2021Breast cancer 2021
Breast cancer 2021
 
Viruses and cancer
Viruses and cancerViruses and cancer
Viruses and cancer
 
Cancer genetics
Cancer geneticsCancer genetics
Cancer genetics
 
How we eat affects our health
How we eat affects our healthHow we eat affects our health
How we eat affects our health
 
Cancer imaging
Cancer imagingCancer imaging
Cancer imaging
 
Happiness in a pandemic
Happiness in a pandemicHappiness in a pandemic
Happiness in a pandemic
 
Cancer screening for seniors
Cancer screening for seniorsCancer screening for seniors
Cancer screening for seniors
 
Cancer prevention aspec
Cancer prevention aspecCancer prevention aspec
Cancer prevention aspec
 
Cancer imaging
Cancer imagingCancer imaging
Cancer imaging
 
Using the internet to get smarter
Using the internet to get smarterUsing the internet to get smarter
Using the internet to get smarter
 
Oropharynx cancer and HPV in 2019
Oropharynx cancer and HPV in 2019Oropharynx cancer and HPV in 2019
Oropharynx cancer and HPV in 2019
 
Cancer prevention
Cancer preventionCancer prevention
Cancer prevention
 
Prostate Cancer and Gleason Score
Prostate Cancer and Gleason ScoreProstate Cancer and Gleason Score
Prostate Cancer and Gleason Score
 
Breast cancer staging 2018 video power points
Breast cancer staging 2018 video power pointsBreast cancer staging 2018 video power points
Breast cancer staging 2018 video power points
 

Recently uploaded

CAD CAM DENTURES IN PROSTHODONTICS : Dental advancements
CAD CAM DENTURES IN PROSTHODONTICS : Dental advancementsCAD CAM DENTURES IN PROSTHODONTICS : Dental advancements
CAD CAM DENTURES IN PROSTHODONTICS : Dental advancements
Naveen Gokul Dr
 
Failure to thrive in neonates and infants + pediatric case.pptx
Failure to thrive in neonates and infants  + pediatric case.pptxFailure to thrive in neonates and infants  + pediatric case.pptx
Failure to thrive in neonates and infants + pediatric case.pptx
claviclebrown44
 
Unit 4 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemisty 3 Quinoline
Unit 4 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemisty 3 QuinolineUnit 4 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemisty 3 Quinoline
Unit 4 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemisty 3 Quinoline
AarishRathnam1
 
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose AcademicsConnective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
MedicoseAcademics
 
Best medicine 100% Effective&Safe Mifepristion ௵+918133066128௹Abortion pills ...
Best medicine 100% Effective&Safe Mifepristion ௵+918133066128௹Abortion pills ...Best medicine 100% Effective&Safe Mifepristion ௵+918133066128௹Abortion pills ...
Best medicine 100% Effective&Safe Mifepristion ௵+918133066128௹Abortion pills ...
Abortion pills in Kuwait Cytotec pills in Kuwait
 
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose AcademicsHistology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
MedicoseAcademics
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Face and Muscles of facial expression.pptx
Face and Muscles of facial expression.pptxFace and Muscles of facial expression.pptx
Face and Muscles of facial expression.pptx
 
Creeping Stroke - Venous thrombosis presenting with pc-stroke.pptx
Creeping Stroke - Venous thrombosis presenting with pc-stroke.pptxCreeping Stroke - Venous thrombosis presenting with pc-stroke.pptx
Creeping Stroke - Venous thrombosis presenting with pc-stroke.pptx
 
CAD CAM DENTURES IN PROSTHODONTICS : Dental advancements
CAD CAM DENTURES IN PROSTHODONTICS : Dental advancementsCAD CAM DENTURES IN PROSTHODONTICS : Dental advancements
CAD CAM DENTURES IN PROSTHODONTICS : Dental advancements
 
Hemodialysis: Chapter 1, Physiological Principles of Hemodialysis - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 1, Physiological Principles of Hemodialysis - Dr.GawadHemodialysis: Chapter 1, Physiological Principles of Hemodialysis - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 1, Physiological Principles of Hemodialysis - Dr.Gawad
 
Anti viral drug pharmacology classification
Anti viral drug pharmacology classificationAnti viral drug pharmacology classification
Anti viral drug pharmacology classification
 
SEMESTER-V CHILD HEALTH NURSING-UNIT-1-INTRODUCTION.pdf
SEMESTER-V CHILD HEALTH NURSING-UNIT-1-INTRODUCTION.pdfSEMESTER-V CHILD HEALTH NURSING-UNIT-1-INTRODUCTION.pdf
SEMESTER-V CHILD HEALTH NURSING-UNIT-1-INTRODUCTION.pdf
 
Failure to thrive in neonates and infants + pediatric case.pptx
Failure to thrive in neonates and infants  + pediatric case.pptxFailure to thrive in neonates and infants  + pediatric case.pptx
Failure to thrive in neonates and infants + pediatric case.pptx
 
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcer.pptx
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcer.pptxNegative Pressure Wound Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcer.pptx
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcer.pptx
 
High Purity 99% PMK Ethyl Glycidate Powder CAS 28578-16-7
High Purity 99% PMK Ethyl Glycidate Powder CAS 28578-16-7High Purity 99% PMK Ethyl Glycidate Powder CAS 28578-16-7
High Purity 99% PMK Ethyl Glycidate Powder CAS 28578-16-7
 
Unit 4 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemisty 3 Quinoline
Unit 4 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemisty 3 QuinolineUnit 4 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemisty 3 Quinoline
Unit 4 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemisty 3 Quinoline
 
Overview on the Automatic pill identifier
Overview on the Automatic pill identifierOverview on the Automatic pill identifier
Overview on the Automatic pill identifier
 
Gross Anatomy and Histology of Tongue by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Gross Anatomy and Histology of Tongue by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptxGross Anatomy and Histology of Tongue by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Gross Anatomy and Histology of Tongue by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
 
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose AcademicsConnective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Connective Tissue II - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
 
Best medicine 100% Effective&Safe Mifepristion ௵+918133066128௹Abortion pills ...
Best medicine 100% Effective&Safe Mifepristion ௵+918133066128௹Abortion pills ...Best medicine 100% Effective&Safe Mifepristion ௵+918133066128௹Abortion pills ...
Best medicine 100% Effective&Safe Mifepristion ௵+918133066128௹Abortion pills ...
 
Treatment Choices for Slip Disc at Gokuldas Hospital
Treatment Choices for Slip Disc at Gokuldas HospitalTreatment Choices for Slip Disc at Gokuldas Hospital
Treatment Choices for Slip Disc at Gokuldas Hospital
 
parliaments-for-health-security_RecordOfAchievement.pdf
parliaments-for-health-security_RecordOfAchievement.pdfparliaments-for-health-security_RecordOfAchievement.pdf
parliaments-for-health-security_RecordOfAchievement.pdf
 
Mgr university bsc nursing adult health previous question paper with answers
Mgr university  bsc nursing adult health previous question paper with answersMgr university  bsc nursing adult health previous question paper with answers
Mgr university bsc nursing adult health previous question paper with answers
 
Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury -time modality -Dr Ayman Se...
Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury -time  modality -Dr Ayman Se...Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury -time  modality -Dr Ayman Se...
Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury -time modality -Dr Ayman Se...
 
Top 10 Most Beautiful Russian Pornstars List 2024
Top 10 Most Beautiful Russian Pornstars List 2024Top 10 Most Beautiful Russian Pornstars List 2024
Top 10 Most Beautiful Russian Pornstars List 2024
 
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose AcademicsHistology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
Histology of Epithelium - Dr Muhammad Ali Rabbani - Medicose Academics
 

Esophagus cancer

  • 1. Cancer of the Esophagus www.aboutcancer.com
  • 2. 2014 Data for Esophagus Cancer New Cases Cancer Deaths 18,170 (1.1%) #19 15,450 (2.6% ) Life Time Risk of developing this cancer is 0.5% 5 Year Survival Rate is 17.5%
  • 3. Incidence and Mortality over the Last 30 Years for Esophagus Cancer
  • 4. Trends in 5 Year Survival Rates for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus
  • 5. Esophagus Cancer by Gender in 2014 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Gender Male Female 14,660 3,510 81% 19%
  • 6. Esophagus Cancer Median Age at Diagnosis Year of Data Male Female 1998 – 2002 68 73 2000 - 2004 67 73 2002 – 2006 67 73 2005 – 2009 66 72
  • 7. Age – Adjusted SEER Incidence Rates for 2000 - 2011 25 20 15 10 5 0 Age 20-49 Age 50 - 64 Age 65-74 Age 75 + Rates per 100,00
  • 8. In the US where there is no routine screening for esophagus cancer, most patients present with advanced stages Nearly 50% are advanced beyond local-regional Less than 60% with local-regional can undergo a curative resection 70-80%of resected specimens show spread to the lymph nodes
  • 9. National Data 2004-2010 Esophagus Cancer from SEER Stage Incidence Survival/5y Local 21% 39.6% Regional 30% 21.1% Distant 37% 3.8%
  • 10. Risk Factors • Tobacco use. • Heavy alcohol use. • Barrett esophagus • Older age. • Being male. • Being African-American.
  • 11. Two most common forms of esophageal cancer are named for the type of cells that become malignant Squamous cell carcinoma forms in squamous cells, the thin, flat cells lining the esophagus. This cancer is most often found in the upper and middle part of the esophagus Adenocarcinoma begins in glandular (secretory) cells. Glandular cells in the lining of the esophagus produce and release fluids such as mucus. Adenocarcinomas usually form in the lower part of the esophagus, near the stomach.
  • 12. In the 1960’s squamous cancer accounted for more than 90% of cases but over the last two decades adenocarcinoma has dramatically increased and is now over 60% in the US Tumors at the esophagogastric junction and proximal 5 cm of the stomach that extend into the EGJ or esophagus are classified and staged as esophageal cancers (the so-called Siewert III EGJ tumors). All other tumors with an epicenter in the stomach >5 cm from the EGJ, or those within 5 cm or the EGJ without extension into the esophagus are staged as gastric cancers.
  • 13. Squamous Cancer • Now only accounts for less than 30% of cases in the US • Tobacco and Alcohol are the major risk factors
  • 14. Adenocarcinoma • now most common type in the US, esp in white men • Obesity and a high Body Mass Index (BMI) are high risk factors, very high BMI risk is 7.6 X higher • GERD (gastroesophageal reflux) high risk • Barrett’s esophagus increases the risk to 30 – 60 X higher
  • 15. Trends in the US for Esophagus Cancer Adenocarcinoma white males Squamous white males Adenocarcinoma black males 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
  • 16. Trends for Adenocarcinoma in the US White males Black males White females Black females 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
  • 17. Epidemiology of Esophagus Cancer in the US Squamous Adenocarcinoma New cases per Year ~ 7,000 ~10,000 Male : Female 3:1 7:1 Black : White 6:1 1:4 Most Common Site Middle Distal Major Risk Factor Smoking, alcohol Barrett’s
  • 18. Barrett’s Esophagus – Columnar Cells Extend Above the GE Junction
  • 19. Barrett’s Esophagus • Replacement of normal esophageal lining cells (stratified squamous) with cells that predispose to cancer (metaplastic columnar epithelium) • Due to chronic GERD (gastroesophageal reflux) • Median age at diagnosis is 55y • Predisposed to getting adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus
  • 20. Barrett’s and Cancer • Estimates of the annual cancer incidence in patients with Barrett's esophagus have ranged from 0.1 to 2.0 percent. • Although the risk of developing esophageal cancer is increased at least 30-fold above that of the general population, the absolute risk of developing cancer is low.
  • 21. Barrett’s and Cancer • Cancer incidence was 6.3 per 1000 person-years. When only studies with well defined criteria for the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus were included, the rate was 5.0 per 1000 person-years. • For high-grade dysplasia the corresponding pooled estimate for cancer incidence was 10.2 per 1000 person-years. • The incidence of mortality was 3.0 per 1000 person-years due to esophageal adenocarcinoma and 37.1 per 1000 person-years due to other causes.
  • 22. Screening for Barrett’s from the AGA (American Gastroenterological Association) Age 50 years or older Male sex White race Chronic GERD Hiatal hernia Elevated body mass index Intra-abdominal distribution of body fat
  • 23. Screening for Barrett’s from the ACP (American College of Physicians) In men older than 50y with GERD symptoms for more than 5 years plus: Nocturnal reflux symptoms Hiatus hernia Elevated body mass index Tobacco use Intra-abdominal distribution of fat
  • 24. Signs and Symptoms of Esophagus Cancer • Difficulty and pain with swallowing • Pressure or burning in the chest • Indigestion or heartburn • Vomiting • Frequent choking on food • Unexplained weight loss • Coughing or hoarseness • Pain behind the breastbone or in the throat
  • 25. Esophagus Anatomy 23- 25 cm from pharynx to the stomach. Often locations are measured form the teeth at the time of endoscopy and the first 15 cm are before the esophagus begins.
  • 26. The esophagus is roughly from C6 to T11
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29. Primary Site Based on Proximal Edge of Tumor Anatomic Esophageal Distance name location from teeth Cervical Upper 15 to < 20cm Thoracic Upper 20 to < 25cm Middle 25 to < 30cm Lower 30 to < 40cm Abdominal Lower 40 to 45 cm EGJ/Cardia 40 to 45 cm
  • 30. Lymph nodes from the esophagus
  • 31. Lymph Nodes at Risk for GE junction
  • 32.
  • 34. Accuracy in Identifying Lymph Node Spread, Comparing CT with EUS (endoscopic ultrasound) or EUS + FNA (fine needle aspirate biopsy) Test Sensitivity Specificity CT 29% (17 – 44%) 89% (72 – 98%) EUS 71% (56 – 83%) 79% (59 – 92%) EUS + FNA 83% (70- 93%) 93% (77 – 99%)
  • 35. Endoscopic Ultrasound and Peri-esophageal Lymph Nodes Benign Malignant
  • 36. Sensitivity in Detecting Nodes/ Mets Test Site Sensitivity Specificity EUS celiac N 85% 96% other N 80% 70% CT regional N 50% 83% abdom N 42% 93% Mets 52% 91% PET regional N 57% 85% Mets 71% 93%
  • 37.
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41. Cross Section Anatomy Heart Esophagus Lung Lung
  • 42. Cross Section Anatomy of the Esophagus
  • 43. Cross Section Anatomy of the Chest
  • 44. Reading a CT Scan near the Esophagus
  • 45. Normal CT of the Esophagus
  • 46. CT Squamous Cancer in the Upper Esophagus
  • 48. CT and PET Scan CT Scan PET Scan
  • 49. PET Scan: Large Squamous Cancer of the Upper Esophagus
  • 50. PET Scan Mid Esophagus Cancer
  • 51. PET Scan Lower Esophagus Cancer
  • 56. Staging System: T N M T = depth of the tumor into the wall of the esophagus N = number of lymph nodes spread M = distant metastases (spread to other parts of the body)
  • 57. Layers of the Esophagus
  • 58. Layers of the Esophagus epithelium Lamina propria Muscularis mucosa Submucosa Muscularis propria Adventitia
  • 59. Layers of the Esophagus g. Stratified epithelial lining f. Mucous membrane e. Muscularis mucosa d. submucosa c. Transverse muscle b. Longitudinal muscle a. Fibrous covering
  • 60. Layers of the Esophagus Mucosa Submucosa Muscle Epithelial Lamina Propria Muscular mucosa
  • 61. Epithelial Basement Membrane Lamina Propria Muscular mucosa Layers of the Mucosa T is = epithelial only T1a = through the basement membrane into lamina propria or muscularis mucosa T1b = into submucosa Submucosa
  • 62. Layers of the Esophagus Muscle Mucosa Submucosa
  • 63.
  • 65. N = Nodes , M = Metastases
  • 66.
  • 67. Staging System, T and N for Esophagus Cancer Tis T1 T1 submucosal intramucosal aorta T3 T4 T2 N0 N1 1-2 nodes Mucosa N2 3-6 nodes N3 7+nodes Submucosa Muscularis propria
  • 68.
  • 69.
  • 70.
  • 71.
  • 72.
  • 73.
  • 74.
  • 75.
  • 76. Survival by Stage NCDB National Data 2003- 2006 Stage Number Survival/5y I 3,786 (12%) 47.6% II 7,324 (24%) 25.1% III 7,444 (24%) 13.8% IV 11,975 (39%) 3.3%
  • 77. Squamous Cancer – Survival after Esophagectomy Years Stage 0 Stage I Stage II Stage III
  • 78. Squamous Cancer – Survival after Esophagectomy Stage Ia Stage 0 Stage Ib Stage IIA Stage IIB Stage IIIA Stage IIIB Stage IIIC
  • 79. Squamous Cancer Survival after Esophagectomy Stage 5 Y 10 Y I 62% 51% Ia 71% 58% Ib 60% 50% II 47% 37% IIa 53% 43% IIb 42% 33% III 20% 16% IIIa 25% 20% IIIb 17% 14% IIIc 14% 12%
  • 80. Adenocarcinoma – Survival after Esophagectomy Years Stage 0 Stage I Stage II Stage III
  • 81. Adenocarcinoma – Survival after Esophagectomy Years Stage 0 Stage IA Stage IB Stage IIA Stage IIB Stage IIIA Stage IIIB Stage IIIC
  • 82. Adenocarcinoma Survival after Esophagectomy Stage 5y 10Y I 73% 61% Ia 77% 67% Ib 63% 51% II 41% 33% IIa 50% 37% IIb 40% 30% III 20% 17% IIIa 25% 20% IIIb 17% 14% IIIc 13% 12%
  • 83. Cancer of the Esophagus www.aboutcancer.com