2. Background
Certiļ¬cation program originally positioned as a
resource for colleges/districts with an interest in
certiļ¬cation but lacked the resources to
implement one.
@Oneās goal was to leverage existing courses
and extend them as a robust pool of offerings
from which institutions could individually design
their own certiļ¬cation programs.
3. Reconceptualizing the @One
Certiļ¬cation Process
@One acts as certiļ¬cation āfacilitatorā for colleges/districts.
strand 1
ā¢ College contacts @One to leverage existing courses
ā¢ College determines own certiļ¬cation curriculum
ā¢ @One monitors and communicates candidate progress
ā¢ Final certiļ¬cation provided by the college
strand 2
@One offers a set certiļ¬cation curriculum and new
standard, state-level certiļ¬cation.
4. Goal #1:
Increase Demand
1. Expand target audience
ā¢ From: Administrators with an emphasis on customizable
curriculum path
ā¢ To: Individual faculty and administrators, now providing a
distinct and pre-determined certiļ¬cation program
ā¢ Considerations: current economic context, increase in
competition in the part-time faculty job market. Part-
timers (or new grads) are interested in securing cost-
effective way to set themselves apart from others.
2. Capture interest through automated web-form submission
ā¢ 9 individual interest requests submitted in ļ¬rst 30 days
5. Goal #1:
Increase Demand
1. Expand target audience
ā¢ From: Administrators with an emphasis on customizable
curriculum path
ā¢ To: Individual faculty and administrators, now providing a
distinct and pre-determined certiļ¬cation program
ā¢ Considerations: current economic context, increase in
competition in the part-time faculty job market. Part-
timers (or new grads) are interested in securing cost-
effective way to set themselves apart from others.
2. Capture interest through automated web-form submission
ā¢ 9 individual interest requests submitted in ļ¬rst 30 days
6. Goal #2:
Deļ¬ne Certiļ¬cation Outcomes
ā¢ Leverage North American Council for Online Learning
(NACOL) 13 core online teaching & instructional design
competencies
ā¢ Collaborative meeting in January to align competencies
with certiļ¬cation courses
7. Goal #3: Identify Assessment
Mechanism/Process for Final Certiļ¬cation
1. Leverage ePortfolios to collect digital artefacts throughout
coursework
ā¢ Researched existing OL certiļ¬cation programs to
understand current assessment trends (CSU East Bay, Sloan-C,
Univ Wisconsin, Cerro Coso CC)
2. Candidate will demonstrate proļ¬ciencies through ePortfolio
review with a āMentor Facilitatorā in their ļ¬nal session
3. The review will culminate in a CCC Confer presentation,
given by the candidate
8. Goal #4:
Refresh/Design Additional Courses
ā¢ Refresh Introduction to Online Teaching course
ā¢ integrate opportunities for content creation, new methods
of student interaction and asssessment, applications of
copyright āfair useā
ā¢ new online version will be offered Summer ā10
ā¢ Design online assessment course
ā¢ design curriculum
ā¢ in process
9. The @One Online Teaching
Certiļ¬cation Program
1
Complete the ļ¬ve core courses. 2
Intro to Online Teaching Complete the online
and Learning teaching practicuum.
Designing an Accessible
Online Course
Demonstrate
Building Online online teaching
Community with Social proļ¬ciencies to
Media your mentor
facilitator in a
Course Management
presentation of
Training
your ePortfolio.
Designing Effective
Online Assessments
10. @One Certiļ¬cation Program
Timeline
Spring 2010 Summer 2010 Fall 2010
Plan & Review Communicate Launch new
certiļ¬cation
program
11. Certiļ¬cation Program - Questions
1. Are there legal concerns associated with the use of the term ācertiļ¬cationā
at a statewide level?
2. Implications to the course curriculum and certiļ¬cation program for
accommodating K-12 audience?
3. How should additional course offerings be positioned in the certiļ¬cation
program?
4. Which ePortfolio tool should we use?
ā¢ Currently looking at Mahara (Moodle plug-in)
5. What topics/issues are essential for the Assessment course?
6. Other ideas for communicating the certiļ¬cation program?
7. Should we implement a ācertiļ¬cation program enrollment feeā that is
distinct from the individual course registration fees?