, Cultures And Ideas In Sir Gawain And The Green Knight

, Cultures And Ideas In Sir Gawain And The Green Knight
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight In this paper I will discuss the ideas, cultures, characteristics of the Middle Ages are referenced and how their
presence interlocks in the work. Sir Gawain's quest covers his obligation to have success on the test of becoming a Green Knight. This would help
have return blow for the following Christmas. Because the Green Knight proposed a challenge, Gawain was required to follow the terms of the
agreement. The journey to find the Green Knight is a sequence of temptations. He lodges at the Castle Bertilak, and completed bargains with his host.
Gawain will exchange anything he gambles on with the Bertilak catches on the hunt.
Ideas that have been taught in many societies since the first civilizations of Mesopotamia to the world now are duty, loyalty and bravery. No period
relied on these ideas more than the Middle Ages time of Europe. The European societies were based on the nature of feudalism. Feudalism worked if
everyone in the society did their duty and gave loyalty to everyone above the on the social latter. The knight was the backbone of the feudal society.
He was the protector of the heavenly Lord, their lady and the earthly lord. The roles and duties of the knight are quotes as, "the most noble knight
under Christ, And the loveliest lades that lived on earth ever, and he the comeliest king, that the court holds." (P. 26)Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
gives a perspective to view life from the courtly aspect of the European feudal
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Analysis Of A Lock Of Hair And A Wounded Heart
A Lock of Hair and a Wounded Heart Throughout the course of history and its literature, authors and poets have served as messengers for the times in
which they lived, whether it be about political upheaval or social constructs or the lives of the common man. One way this was accomplished was
through satire. Alexander Pope, whom of which lived in the literary Restoration period and wrote the poem, "The Rape of the Lock," in 1714, provides
a work as an excellent example of satire. He parodies the upper classes favorite literature (epic, heroic poetry) to mock the absurdity and irrationality
of the upper class. Using the common tropes of divine intervention, hyperbole, and lofty language, a gleefully sarcastic tone emerges to allow the
reader to see through the faux seriousness regarding the loss of a strand of hair from a noble woman. In numerous works of epic poetry and that of the
classic style, an invocation to divine spirits and gods invited a sense of vindication and importance in a work. Works like Homer's long beloved
Odyssey among others almost completely rely on divine intervention to effectuate the plot and justify actions of either the protagonist or the antagonist.
Pope crafitly uses this common tactic in such works to parody the highbrow love for them. In the case of Belinda, her beauty is such to rival nymphs
and Aphrodite; she is incontestably divine in human form, made of love and youth and flowering nature. That beauty, however, is soiled when a lock
from

Fashion Of William Shakespeare 's Time
http://alharthisamah.wix.com/16thcenturyfashion
Samah Alharthi
English 206
Dr. Swanson
22–02–1016
Fashion in Shakespeare's Time
Elizabethan Era (1558–1603)
Elizabethan Era Clothing
The Elizabethan era was an extraordinarily fashion era for both man and women, a time when everything was changing from the fifteenth century
simple dress to extravagant and dramatic styles which we call Elizabethan fashion. At that time, new styles, modern yet unique fabrics, charm colors,
sharp design and glamor silhouette were evolving. Every layer and piece of Elizabethan outfit was equally important, from the fancy dress to the
smallest details. Definitely, the Elizabethan era was the time of beauty and fascination. In fact, during the Elizabethan time clothing reflects mood,
values and the person's statue in the society. So fashion at that time was the primary indicator of one's social statue and the differences in styling
between upper class and lower class were noticeable and very easy distinguished, in terms of fabric, colors, and design.
During the Elizabethan time period, in order to understand a person's life style including clothes, we must first understand how the society at that time
worked. The Elizabethan society was divided into three classes, first upper class including nobles and royalty, secondmiddle class or hard–working
class, and finally lower class or peasants. The availability of fabrics, colors, and designs were extremely limited for lower class compared to

The True Nobleman in Julius Caesar's Rome: Brutus
"A noble man compares and estimates himself by an idea which is higher than himself; and a mean man, by one lower than himself. The one produces
aspiration; the other ambition, which is the way in which a vulgar man aspires" –Marcus Aurelius.
In the novel Julius Caesar there are many people who claimed nobility. However there is only one noble man. There are many test that will show who
is truly noble because, anyone in Rome could claim to be noble. Brutus was the only noble roman in Julius Caesar.
Brutus was one of many Romans with noble bloodlines. Although Brutus was noble, he never used it to get ahead. There are many times when Brutus
could have used the fact that he is truly noble but he didn't. Many people argue that a noble ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
That was his motivation behind killing Caesar. As he stated early in the play "Did I the tired Caesar. And this man/Is now become a god, and Cassius
is/ a wretched creature and must bend his body/If Caesar carelessly but nod on him" (I.ii.115–118). Cassius obviously hated what Caesar had become,
and how was so powerful. Cassius obviously hated what Caesar had become, and how he was so powerful. He knew the truth about Caesar, and that
is why he killed him. He even said to Brutus, "Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed/That he is grown so great"? (I.ii.149–150). Cassius saved
Caesar's life, and now Caesar doesn't even like or trust him. After the games, Caesar mentioned to Mark Antony "Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry
look/He thinks too much. Such men are dangerous (I.ii.194–195)". Cassius knew Caesar felt this way. That was his motivation, and that is why he isn't
noble. Hate is not a valid reason to kill someone. The rest of the conspirators aren't noble either. They never stated a clear reason to kill Caesar. All
of them only went along with it because Cassius convinced them. Caesar, Mark Antony, and Octavius are not noble. Caesar was never noble. He
claimed he was noble. However people believed he was noble, because he was a very good speaker. Almost everything he said was a lie, but everyone
believes him. That is how he got ahead so quickly. Noble men do not lie. Antony and Octavius are worse

The Role of Nobility in Sir Thomas MaloryвЂ™s "Tale of Sir...
The value of nobility in the middle ages can hardly be questioned. The majority of nobles lived a life of luxury, having riches beyond the wildest
dreams of commoners. When one thinks of medieval knights, nobility is often comes to mind, but did knights have to be members of the noble
class? Sir Thomas Malory's "The Tale of Sir Gareth" examines this question and presents an interesting view as to the true value of a knight. Malory
uses the actions of important characters to reveal his opinion that the nobility of a knight was secondary to his integrity, courage, and benevolence.
Many characters in Malory's world view nobility as an absolute must and even a synonym for being a knight. Sir Kay is a telling example of this. In the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
After Sir Gareth leaves Lady Lyoness, disappointed that his prize has rejected him for a year, she sends her brother Sir Gryngamour to retrieve
Beaumains' dwarf in order to question it of Beaumains' true name. Once she learns of Sir Gareth's nobility she concludes she can love him
(Malory 156). Sir Gareth's attempt to regain his dwarf reveals another aspect of his knighthood, his masculinity, as he threatens Sir Gryngamour if
the dwarf isn't safely returned to him (Huber 52). While there are no doubts that Lyoness is an important character, one has to wonder about the
importance Malory places on her views. Asking Sir Gareth to prove himself for a year winning more fame was an absurd proposition, especially
considering his impressive victory through the Passage Perelous and defeat of the Red Knight. Her actions prove her to be somewhat dimwitted.
Malory uses Lyoness to further expose the lack of value of nobility in a knight. Another minor character, the dwarf, reveals other attributes of
knighthood. When the dwarf is stolen by Sir Gryngamour, Sir Gareth is given the opportunity to show off his masculinity, as he challenges Sir
Gryngamour to a fight to win the dwarf back (Huber 52). The dwarf also gains fame for Sir Gareth when he removes the ring that disguises Sir Gareth
(Huber 53). After

Analysis Of Francis Fukuyama 's ' The End Of History And...
The National Review describes Francis Fukuyama as "one of the most important thinkers in America" because of his status as a triple–threat in public
intellectual life: he is able to "maintain high appointments in academe, produce popular books and magazine writing, and advise American presidents
and foreign leaders directly". This status contributes to Fukuyama's continued success as a political scientist, political economist and author. After
achieving notability for his book, The End of History and the Last Man, Fukuyama changed pace and wrote a distinctively historical work (as opposed
to his aforementioned previous novels that were more theoretical) entitled The Origins of Political Order: From PreHuman Times to the French
Revolution. Citing 9/11 and American's failed ability to "adequately understand how hard it is to establish institutions" Fukuyama decided to write a
novel concerning where political institutions originated in countries that had them.
Fukuyama introduces his novel by developing his theory that there are three factors involved in political order: 1, the state 2, rule of law and 3,
accountable government. He attempts to prove that a modern democracy (such as Denmark) would consist of a stable balance between these three
components. By using these specific concepts, Fukuyama is able to successfully analyze the checks and balances of a countries political system, and
thus determine its relative stability. He illustrates these elements as separate columns

Social Classes Romeo And Juliet
Ms. Groff
World Literature
3 March, 2016
Social Classes Romeo and Juliet
George Edward Woodberry once said, "Shakespeare is, essentially, the emanation of the Renaissance. The overflow of his fame on the Continent in
later years was but the sequel of the flood of the Renaissance in Western Europe. He was the child of that great movement, and marks its height as it
penetrated the North with civilization" ("George Edward Woodberry Quote"). The Renaissance, as Woodberry stated within his quote, would not have
been as popular if it was not for William Shakespeare. He is a crucial part of the Renaissance. Not only did Shakespeare have an impact on the
Renaissance, social class did as well. Social Classes have been building for many years and they made a tremendous difference during the
Renaissance, to the point where the social classes controlled society. The Renaissance was a time period of rebirth and Shakespeare was taking
advantage of that by contributing a majority of his pieces of writing, as well as his plays. One of his most known pieces of work is Romeo and
Juliet. Shakespeare uses the idea of social classes and portrays it throughout his play, Romeo and Juliet. He generates various characters and places
them into different social ranks and standing. This impacts the play significantly and brings a new light and perspective on Shakespeare 's writing.
Shakespeare also illustrates the specific advantages each social class received during the this time period and within

Character Analysis Of Henry V
In this time of feudalism, people knew Henry V as an important leader who gives his glory and honor to not only a few individuals, but to each and
every person who is serving physically as a knight and doing any actions made to build status into their country. The speech that he gives before
the battle clearly states the loyal characteristics on how much of hard work he put into training his men whether they were from noble birth or
from the poorest and lowest of classes. With the following statements, they show his gamely character meaning to speak out with courage with a
purpose. First, he states how he and his army can have the achievement they fight for even if there are only a few men to fight in a chaotic battle
like this, then he forms a type of honorable day and group remembered for fighting in this battle dead or alive, so that there would be no level on
which individual was better than the other, and last he makes it loud and clear that he would even treat those men as if they were his brothers because
they were the only few men that would support him and fight with him against their enemies. The three big examples here are the political
expectations on what a group of men needs from a leader like Henry V and a true king with the power of his absolute anarchy.
First, he plans to share his own honor to the few men that join him for their sacrifices and not to a group or army increased because then that honor
won't be that memorable. He even states "God's will! I

Chekhov 's The Cherry Orchard
"I seem to have lost my sight": Nobility's Privileged Blindness in The Cherry Orchard
In Anton Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard, Lyubov Ranevsky loses her estate because she is unwilling to resort to commercializing it and renting it out.
Ranevsky tells Peter Trofimov, "You see where the truth is, and where untruth is, but I seem to have lost my sight and see nothing... because you're
young, because you haven't had time to suffer... You boldly look forward, isn 't it because you cannot foresee or expect anything terrible, because so
far life has been hidden from your young eyes?" (167). However, in the play, Chekhov attributes thenobility's blindness to the romantic, superficial
aspects of their lives as members of the upper class. They hold on to their memories of the old social order, refusing to accept the inevitable reality that
the Cherry Orchard must be sold. Ranevsky and her brother, Leonid Gaev, represent the blindness and backwardness of the aristocracy. They see the
cherry orchard from a nostalgic, romanticized perspective and remain stuck in their old, superficial habits. The cherry orchard represents the old Russia
where class was tied to land ownership and ruling over serfs. Ranevsky and Gaev stubbornly cling to the past. They are unable to look towards the
future and face the fact that the cherry orchard must be chopped down. When she sees the orchard, Ranevsky exclaims, "Oh, my childhood, days of my
innocence!... nothing has changed" (149). She is wrong; Russia is

The Narrator Of A Rose For Emily
The narrator of "A Rose for Emily" serves as the town 's aggregate voice. Faultfinders have faced off regarding whether it is a man or lady; a previous
significant other of Emily Grierson 's; the kid who recollects seeing Mr. Grierson in the entryway, holding the whip; or the town tattle, initiating the
push to separate the entryway toward the end. It is conceivable that the storyteller is Emily 's previous hireling, Tobe–he would have known her
personally, maybe including her mystery. A couple of parts of the story bolster this hypothesis, for example, the way that the storyteller regularly
alludes to Emily as "Miss Emily" and gives stand out illustrative insight about the Colonel Sartoris, the leader: the way that he implemented a law
requiring that dark ladies wear cook 's garments in broad daylight. Regardless, the storyteller holes up behind the aggregate pronoun we. By utilizing
we, the storyteller can quality what may be his or her own contemplations and assessments to the greater part of the townspeople, transforming private
thoughts into familiar ways of thinking. The storyteller extends the secret of his identity and the amount he knows toward the end of the story, when
the townspeople find Homer 's body. The storyteller admits "As of now we knew" that an upstairs room had been fixed up. Be that as it may, we never
discover how the storyteller thinks about the room. More imperative, now, without precedent for the story, the storyteller utilizes the pronoun "they"

Character Analysis Of Oedipus
When contemplating the character of Oedipus in Oedipus Tyrannus, it would be easy to dismiss him as merely a tragic character with only a cursory
glance. One must dig deeply into Oedipus to fully understand him as a man. Aristotle understood this when used Oedipus as his example of a tragic
hero. It is through deep analysis that one fully grasps that while Oedipus is a tragic character, he is also heroic in his being and his actions. Yes,
Oedipus does make mistakes due to his hubris, but this does not negate that he is a noble person who does act nobly. Part of Aristotle's discussion of
the tragic hero is that he must be a person of greatness. This greatness entails not only a high social position, but it also includes a nobility of character.
Oedipus displays virtuous characteristics even before becoming king of Thebes. He becomes king because of his encounter with the Sphinx.
Thebes had been under the Sphinx's thrall for some time with innocent lives being taken due to an incorrect answer to the Sphinx's riddle. When
Oedipus encountered the Sphinx, he demonstrated wisdom and insight by correctly answering the Sphinx's riddle. Oedipus' triumph over the
Sphinx was viewed by the Priest as an act of bravery and as a rite of passage. The Priest refers to Oedipus as the one who "saved" Thebes from the
Sphinx (Oed. Prologue.40). His actions led Oedipus to be called "a king of wisdom tested in the past", "Noblest of men", and "Liberator" (Oed.
Prologue. 46, 53, 55). Thus, it was Oedipus' actions before he was king that made him heroic.
Not only was Oedipus heroic before becoming king, he was also heroic once he was made king. The play begins with Thebes suffering from
plague that has been caused, according to the Oracle at Delphi, by the death of Laius, Oedipus' predecessor. Oedipus as a noble king, responds to
the cries of his people. In fact, he refers to them as "poor Children" as if they are his metaphorical children (Oed.Prologue. 66). He imposes on
himself the responsibility of the safety and nurturing of the people of Thebes. He sees his people's suffering and is wrought over it because he has
"been in tears for a long while" over it (Oed. Prologue. 69).
It is this care and concern that forces Oedipus to

The Roles Of The Elizabethan Period
The Elizabethan period, named after the greatest Queen of England – Queen Elizabeth I who ruled England during that time, is considered to be the
most splendid age of the history of English Literature, the golden age of English history and one of the greatest periods of world history. It was a time
of many changes and developments and remarkable feats were achieved during this time. But how different is it exactly from the present? At the same
manner, how is it akin to the present? Monarchy, a political system based upon the undivided sovereignty or rule of a single person, were a dominant
form of government during the Elizabethan Period, not only in England, but in the surrounding countries as well. The monarch of England during the
Elizabethan... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The role of both men and women at that time were hardly any different than it was before. The Elizabethan women from wealthy and noble families
were sometimes allowed the privilege of an Education but the Elizabethan women who were commoners would attend school not receive any formal
type of education. Their education would be for the preparation of the only real career option for a girl that was considered at that time – marriage.
Being married was immensely desirable by all women of the lower classes. Living their life in a convent or nunnery was no longer an option to
remain single as a result of the dissolution of the monasteries. Therefore, the only alternative to marriage for Elizabethan women of the lower
classes was domestic service. Those women who did not marry or haven't married were thought about by their neighbors as witches and were
subject to suspicion. Due to this, all Elizabethan women would be expected to marry, wives were regarded as "property" of their husbands and the
women were expected to get married and be dependent on the male population all their life. Though the role of women in the present is still not
equal as that of men, the role of women has immensely changed over the generations. Much restrictions were either removed or loosened. Nowadays,
women can receive formal education and go to exclusive schools, marrying is not the only career option for them as they can now work professional
jobs and do much of what they weren't allowed to do in the

The Influence Of The Middle Ages In Medieval Europe
Were the Middle Ages in Europe characterized more by hope or desire?
The early middle ages in Europe were characterized by conflict. Vikings, Eastern tribes, and Muslim armies battered the continent from all sides. Most
of the emperors were too weak to fight off the threats after emperor charlemagne. Powerful nobles independently controlled their own land, in which
they usually were servile to their emperor. Feudalism then became the main political, social, and economic organization of medieval Europe. Serfs
worked as primarily farms but could be called to the war at any time. They didn't have many rights but they could own their own freedom and work on
their own land, but most of them soaked in misery.
Monarchs had limited power and usually ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
They built beautiful cathedrals and churches as a sign of their faith in God. When you visit a medieval church or cathedral you do not get a feeling of
despair. I would personally say that the Middle ages were characterized by hope. The believed and had a deep feeling for Christ.
Towns grew larger during the middle ages and were centre of craft, commerce and trade. People were able to grow rich through their business skills.
There was always hope that a poor man might be able to improve his lot in life.Even peasants, who are sometimes thought of as desperately poor and
wretched, could improve their lot in life. some peasants were better off than others, and some even became wealthy through accumulating land. There
were technological innovations. Farming methods were improved, and there were inventions like spectacles, and the printing press.
The middle ages was a period of nothing but hope. They always looked for the positive in things and always looked at the bright side of everything.
There wasn't a time that they thought bad about a situation. They always believed that the best would happen because of Christ and I think that is how
they got through what the did and succeeded as they did. They were extremely

##taire, Candide, And Nicolas Toussaints, The Noailles...
Before the French Revolution began, people were openly expressing their dissatisfaction with French society through written means. The discontent
comes from many areas, but a large focus comes from the nobility. Voltaire, Candide, or Optimism, Isabelle de CharriГЁre, The Nobleman (1763),
and Nicolas Toussaint le Moyne des Essarts, The Noailles Affair (1786), gives a clear representation of how thenobility is viewed in the second half of
the eighteenth century. Writers represented most of French nobility as mainly being only concerned about their family heritage and luxurious
privileges, which greatly corresponds with reality as can be seen in William Doyle's The Oxford History of the French Revolution. Heritage, or
family lineage, for a French nobleman or woman was very important to him or her, due to the fact that only a person born from a noble could be of
noble rank. A satirical viewpoint of this belief can be perceived in the work of Candide, or Optimism by Voltaire. Voltaire wrote of how the Baron's
sister would not marry a man because he "could only ever give proof of seventy–one [quartering's], the rest of his genealogical tree having been lost
through the ravages of time (3). The satire of this statement is in the amount of quarterings, history of nobility in a family, that he would have had to
show. Seventy–one quartering's is possibly as far back as to the very creation of France as a nation, virtually impossible to show. Due to this attention
towards ancient

Weaknesses Of The French Crown
Importance of the Weaknesses of the French Crown in Explaining the Outbreak of the French Wars of Religion in 1562
Previously France had been ruled by Henry II, a strong experienced ruler. It was, however, an unfortunate jousting accident lead to the swift decline
of the French monarchy. Henry's successor, Francis II, was only fifteen years old on his accession to the throne in 1559. He was inexperienced and
easily manipulated. Charles IX, a ten year old who relied upon the help of Catherine de Medici, his regent, then succeeded him. It was this new weak
monarchy that acted as a catalyst for the many underlying problems that had been previously controlled. The weaknesses of the monarchy allowed ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Francis Duke of Guise quickly assumed control of the army, church and foreign affairs. The Montmorency family had been stripped of office. The
sudden shift of power towards the Guise family heightened tensions between the aristocratic factions.
The monarchy in France operated through a clientage system. The King was at the apex and he would give money and protection to the clientage
beneath him, who, in return would offer the king loyalty. Those beneath him included large aristocratic families and below these families were the
nobility, and further down still, the lesser nobility. The three aristocratic families were therefore reliant on the nobility below them in the system for
support. In return they would give offices and jobs to their clients. Due to a weak monarchy this clientage system broke down. The clientage system
was a good way of exercising control over the major aristocratic families. However, in order for such a system to function there needed to be a strong
monarch and a large sum of money, neither of which were available in 1559. After the vast amount of money spent in the Hapsburg– Valios wars the
royal treasury was drained of resources. The monarchy not only lacked a strong ruler but was also economically weak. It meant that the King could no
longer keep the aristocratic families under control by the means of the clientage system. The Guise's, who had

Essay on Nicholas I
Nicholas I
Nicholas I has been portrayed, and perhaps rightfully so, as a strict and reactionary tsar. Indeed, his internal policies were often repressive –– he sought
to nip any liberalism in the bud, often brutally. His approach to solving problems in the Empire and keeping control was to create the "Nicholas
system", a bureaucratic system defined by and completely based on absolute monarchy. Nicholas revamped govermental structure by strengthening and
centralizing bureaucratic structures to an unprecedented degree. He did this as an attempt to deal with all of Russia's problems himself. At most
importantly the structure known as "His Majesty's own Chancery," which was the nerve–center of the empire's administrative mechanisms. ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
There demands would have been politically disadvantageous to Nicholas – Poland was the one European country in his Empire. If he lost Poland, he
would lose his foothold in Europe and Russia would easily be classified as simply an Asiatic empire. At first, Nicholas' attempts to squelch the rebellion
were disastrous–– his general was not effective at all in battle strategy and many of his men were being killed by cholera. In fact, his brother
Konstantin was killed by the same disease. Finally, after switching generals, Nicholas was able to regain Poland. However, his Polish policies made
him unpopular with France and England. Public opinion was decidedly on the side of the Polish insurgents.
Furthermore, Russia experienced a cholera epidemic in 1830–1, a potential cause for disorder. Nicholas retreated to his summer residence in Peterhof
to avoid the plague. The populace was left in the care of an inefficient administration and started to grow restless. Rumors started going around that
there was no real cholera problem, but rather people had been hired to go around poisoning food and drink. Mobs were formed and on July 3, there
was serious rioting in the capital of St. Petersburg. The mobs invaded hospitals, broke the windows, threw medical supplies into the street, and attacked
the doctors. After all this rioting, Nicholas returned to the capital to confront his people. In a typical flourish of drama, he

Corruption In Canterbury Tales
A medieval miller was a worker that would grind grain at the mill to produce flour and meal. In Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales, the Miller
is a deceitful man that advances in her career through deception and tells a fabliau, a comical fable told in verse that is characterized by sexual
obscenity. Fabliaux were generally told by jongleurs, or medieval entertainers. This particular fabliau is a bawdy tale that discusses a scandalous affair.
Through the Miller's description as a thieving and scheming peasant and the Miller's raunchy tale, Chaucer criticizes the dangerous precedent of
corruption set by the nobility which consequently spreads to all classes due to esteem and success amassed by corruption and the stereotype of the
Third Estate or lower–class as lewd and having a lack of intelligence.
Chaucer's description of the Miller as deceitful and thieving through his appearance and actions criticizes the upper–class' tendency to underestimate
the ability of the lower–class. The upper class is so consumed with maintaining their image of affluence and looking down on the lower–class, they fail
to recognize that peasants can learn to imitate their habits of corruption that lead to immense wealth. The Miller is depicted as a well–built, muscular
man who wears "a whit cote and a blew hood" and has a red beard "as any sowe or fox" that would steal from his customers by selling his grain for
three times its worth, "yit he hadde a thombe of gold"(554,565–566). The Miller

Analysis Of Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte DArthur
A knight's role in society during the middle ages is to be a sacrificial pawn to the king. During the medieval times, the knight class is under the king
and lords classes; however, they were also within the nobility rank. In exchange for land and food, they are obligated to assist and support their lord and
king. They must be physically and mentally prepared to forfeit their lives when they fight for and protect their lord no matter the occasion. According
to the code of chivalry, they must serve their king and remain loyal always. In addition, a chevalier cannot act on their own accord if the consequences
include betrayal of the king, thus they must remain selfless. All the chevaliers have their flaws; however, the other three knights ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Despite the fact that Sir Gawain and Sir Launcelot had a poor relationship, he has asked for Sir Launcelot's assistance because he understands that
Sir Launcelot is the "flower of the knighthood," and an essential key to protecting his king since he is unable to complete the task himself (Malory
221). In spite of Sir Gawain exerted the efforts of writing to Sir Launcelot, Sir Launcelot never appeared on the battlefield. Although Sir Bedivere has
been with King Arthur during the fight with Sir Modred, does not necessarily mean he is more chivalrous and loyal than Sir Launcelot. As instructed
by King Arthur, Sir Bedivere were to take the sword "Excalibur to the shore of the lake and throw in the water" (Malory 340–1). In response to his
wish, Sir Bedivere decided to deceive the king and claim that he has seen nothing when he threw the sword into the water. Lies reached the king ears
twice such as seeing only "the wind upon the waves" and "the lapping of the waves" (Malory 348–354). Automatically, King Arthur knew Sir Bedivere
has been dishonest with him and states, "twice you have betrayed me" (Malory 355). Sir Bedivere allowed his greed to lead him astray from the
code of chivalry. Corresponding with the code of chivalry, he must live to serve the king, live to defend the crown and country and all it holds dear and
obey the law of the king. He has broken all these laws by becoming a priest like the

English Social Structure In The Early 18th Century
Source 6 Esther
"English Social Structure in the Early 18th Century." www4.wittenberg.edu/academics/hist/crom/brit/socstruc.html . N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Jan. 2016
The relationship between the nobility and the peasants is that one group is at the top, while the other is at the bottom. The nobility or gentry, were the
dukes, marquesses, earls, viscounts and barons, of which there were about 180 in the early century. These were men who sat in the House of
Lords by hereditary right. They lived in wealth, and earned money off of land ownership, while the lower classes, or peasants, were the ones who
worked. Poverty was widespread in the 18th century, especially when harvests were poor and food prices rose. The poor would be housed in
dormitory conditions, divided by sex, with 2 or more to each bed. Rules were strict, food minimal and work difficult. This information in important
in understanding the difference between the lifestyles of the rich and poor in 18th century England. This is a reliable source because the link for this
website contains ".edu" which proves that this is an academic website and it is used in schools, making it reliable because it is used by many
students and was created as part of a school's curriculum. This source is relevant to A Tale of Two Cities because using the information we gathered,
we can understand the social and economic differences between characters in the story due to social rank. Source 7 Esther "English titles in the 18th
and 19th

Machiavelli : The Power Of The Prince As A Prince
Machiavelli also goes to mentioning how a Prince can become a prince with four of the principles he has listed in the text. It is said that one "Cannot
be called prowess to kill fellow citizens, to betray friends, to be treacherous, pitiless, irreligious. These ways can win a prince power but not glory,"
(Pg.174) This statement was to show how a prince can come to power through the use of crime, the second one is hereditary. In most cases the
prince is the next one for the throne and to lead so it's an easier transition for a prince in this category. According to the text, those who fear, are the
ones who are dependent on the prince who ultimately become the loyal ones, where as the enemies of the prince are always those who are
dependent and have the aid of the army such as the nobles. The wealth, army and knowledge is all passed down. The third principle is by the
constitutional principality, "A man who becomes prince by favor of the people finds himself standing alone, and he has near him either no one or
very few not prepared to take orders," (pg.175) here Machiavelli goes on to mentioning how becoming prince through popular vote is often a
disaster because not every noble man is ready to take orders from a prince who got voted to be prince and has no skills to be one. Here we can see
how the ignorance and selfish arrogance in man kind is revealed. Machiavelli is always brutally honest when describing men kind and their
behaviors in politics. The forth principle is the honoring of the prince on his words. According to the text, Machiavelli insists that a prince should
always stick to his words because men are wretched creatures who would not keep their word to you, you need not keep your word to the them.
And no prince ever lacked good excuses to color his bad faith." (pg.180) here we see how Machiavelli mentions the cunning games that go on in the
minds of man kind. This shows how being "virtuous" is not significant for Machiavelli where as it is for Plato, since Machiavelli has seen it all
happen before his eyes. Where as Plato has no experiences to relate all his theories with.
Although Plato and Machiavelli have one similar content which helps us understand that a ruler is needed to rule a city

Comparison Of Classism In Desiree's Baby And A Rose For Emily
Take everything you know about racism, sexism, and religionism and toss it out the window, because there's an impediment to prosperity that is
often underlooked: Classism. Classism is a suppression which always has and always will continue to affect our everyday lives. The disparities that
presently exist between the lower and higher classes form a condition where it is unlikely to allow for equality for anyone. The short stories "A Rose
of Emily," written by William Faulkner, and "Desiree's Baby," written by Kate Chopin, offered several depictions of classism within a society. "A
Rose for Emily" recounts the life of an isolated, aristocratic woman named Emily Grierson who symbolically represents the demise of the old Southern
society. Similarly, "DГ©sirГ©e's Baby" portrays classism present in mid–nineteenth century Southern society in conjunction with the inequalities that
exist between race. Class prejudice plays an important role as it was behind the emergence of the characters' unspeakable actions. In "A Rose for
Emily" and "Desiree's Baby," classism is emphasized and provokes arrogance, denial, and the demise of others.
Denial is a recurring theme in both stories rendered by those who believe to be in a higher class. In "A Rose for Emily," Emily is depicted as an
isolated woman who is so attached to the customs and aristocracy of the past to the degree that she cannot accept change. Emily considers herself as a
wealthy and powerful spinster, and her family's position

Hamlet
Dearest friends, family and the people of Denmark. We gather here today to mourn the loss of the noble prince, loyal son and true friend, Prince
Hamlet. But we are not here only to mourn, but to reminisce the times we have spent with him, both the good and the bad and to remember him as the
person he was. Prince Hamlet did not live a very fortunate, on the contrary his final weeks were filled with a tragedy none of us should have to bear,
but he lived his life to the full and I am sure that he has, in some way touched the lives of all of us here today.
Hamlet passed away young, a mere 30 years of age, and I sincerely regret that I will never be able to see such a fine young man take command of the
throne and restore nobility to the state ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, it is this that I will miss most of you and I am sure all present today will miss these qualities in you.
Hamlet was deeply in love with the recently departed fair Ophelia, daughter of Polonious, who also sadly is not with us. He loved her much more
than he expressed, and it is unfortunate that his inability to express his love for her could have been part of her downfall. Although he treated her
scornfully and rudely I know that he loved her more than anyone could imagine. Hamlet, I remember, at the dear Ophelia's funeral, you told the
whole world of your love. "I loved Ophelia. 40 thousand brothers could not, with all their quantity of love make up my sum," you said. I cannot help
but think that if you had expressed your love for the fair maiden, both her and quite possibly you would still be with us today. He loved his mother,
Queen Gertrude. Although he held her in disdain for her hasty marriage to Claudius, who he despised, he still loved her with all his heart
I ask everyone present here today, not to remember Hamlet as the apparent madman he was in his final days, for this is not a showing of his true self,
it was an extremely intelligent plan which would restore nobility to the royal family. Hamlet, as your dying wish I promised that I would tell the
people what you have done for your country and I am honoured that I can share your story here today.
You showed great bravery and trust

Before The Governour By Sir Thomas Elyot: Literary Analysis
Just as one would want their doctor or lawyer to be well–educated in their field of study, a prince–and therefore, a king–should be well–educated, too.
After all, a king must know how to successfully and justly rule a kingdom and its people. Even though today we have medical and law schools,
there were no schools that taught how to be a good king. Instead, books were written in order to instruct and advise princes. Most of these books
were written by humanists, and one of the best works was Sir Thomas Elyot's The Book Named the Governour. While it was eventually surpassed by
newer, more relevant works, Elyot's book was popular during the reign of the Tudors and no doubt would it have inspired the playwright William
Shakespeare. Sir Elyot's... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
A Spaniard named Juan Luis VivГЁs published The Teaching of the various kinds of Knowledge (De tradendis disciplinis) in 1523. VivГЁs
encouraged teaching in the vernacular, but only if the tutors know the language marvelously well "For unless he makes use of the right and proper
expressions in the mother–tongue, he will certainly mislead the boys, and the error thus imbibed will accompany them persistently as they grow up,
and as men" (Elyot xxvi). The Teaching of the various kinds of Knowledge differed from The Book Named the Governour in that it was primarily
for those who would become lawyers, soldiers, clergymen, and statesmen. While these professions are primarily held by men, VivГЁs wasn't opposed
to women learning. He just believed women should be limited to domestic skills and management, music, and subjects which promote piety, chastity,
and obedience instead of learning history, grammar, and logic; while this applied mostly to aristocratic women, women on the lower end of society
could still read and write both Latin and Greek and knew of classic authors and culture ("The "Education" of a Prince

Challenges During The Elizabethan Era
The Elizabethan Era or sometimes referred to as the "Golden Age" was a forty five year time period in which Queen Elizabeth the I or "Queen
Bees" made it possible for England to become a powerful and thriving nation once again after the instability her sister Mary or "Bloody Mary" and
previous family members had left in England years before her reign. Though Queen Elizabeth the I faced many challenges during her reign she made it
possible for England to thrive as a nation and to this day her reign is considered one of the most successful and most honorable reigns in the history of
monarchs. The Elizabethan reign brought forth many great advancements both culturally and politically, but through all this, one aspect of society was
being greatly... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Women's self worth was hidden below all the masculinity that was so dominant at the time. It might be inferred that Elizabeth the I decided not to get
married to make a specific point, the point that women can become great and make a country great without men involved in their reign, only God. A
question asked by many is that of "What would England have been like if women had been allowed to use their intelligence for purposes other than
housework?" Many great things and advancements could have been made if only they would have had the chance, but everything that occurred during
the Elizabethan Era had a purpose and it might be that in modern days women take great initiative in many aspects because of the past things they went
through that helped initiate an ardor in women to make a difference in these present

Absolutism In The French Revolution
Introduction
Europe has always been a great creator and revolutionary continent regarding history, plenty of revolutions and ideas developments took place there,
passing through changes on territories demands, and many kinds of governments. In the 18th century, most of the countries were still under an
absolutist government, which means the absolute king had total control of any aspect of the population.
Notwithstanding in France, in the late eighteenth century, absolutism constituted a huge obstacle to the full development of the French bourgeoisie. The
French revolution was a reflection of the bourgeoisie struggle for political power, such a revolution carries the "French" term because it started in
France, by a series of factors that will ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The bourgeoisie, had a better social status, however they claimed for greater political participation and more economic freedom in their work, since
everything was ruled by the absolutist government.
Due this oppressive situation in France, and the visit of French intellectuals to the English Parliament, the "Old Regime" began to be criticized, and
intellectuals concluded that the present government in France was unfair, and that the population was oppressed and unhappy. The traditional order
should be overturned, in the name of freedom. A proposal for a new society was created; the government would only be fair when guaranteeing the
freedom and equality of all before the law. Thus, the Universal Law of legal equality was developed, and still prevails to this day: "all men are created
equal."
In the economy physiocracy (power of nature) was expected to occur, it should work naturally, that is no barriers for business; the state should not
meddle in the economy (with rules, monopolies, and others). For the enlightenment intellectuals no society should be obliged to accept the tyranny. If a
government is oppressing and unsatisfactory the people have the right to fight to change it, ergo culminating a revolutionary

Inequality In The Cherry Orchard
The erosion of social hierarchy causing a dawn of class issue and inequality amongst different classes of society has played a huge role in Chekhov's
The Cherry Orchard. The abolition of Russian serfdom has caused Russian society into a time of flux and confusion. Due to this, it gave the ambitious
serfs who were previously pitted in the lower class, a chance to become wealthy and move up in social class. Thus, this allowed for the rise of
ambitious and talented in trade and industry, allowing them to gain primary roles in this new capitalist society. Causing a flux of power in Russian
society as result of the erosion of power and this is mirrored in Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard. This rise in power for one allows for the fall in another.
However, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The liberation allows for the opportunistic middle class who prioritizes these new values and thus, are on the precursor of success, evoking change,
taking fate into their own hands and controlling the fate of those around them. Although Trofimov does not take action to make changes, he is able
to illustrate and set the grounds and rules of success and the how to adapt in this time of flux and change. Trofimov states that "Mankind marches
forward, perfecting its strength. Everything that is attainable for us now will one day be near and clear, but we must work we must help with will
all our force those we seek for truth. At present only a few men work in Russia. The vast majority of the educated people that I know seek after
nothing, do nothing and are as incapable of work." Trofimov is talking about the aristocrats who are "educated" but do things with it and are born into
power but do nothing with that power. Thus, explaining one of the of pillars of capitalism which is practicality, and thus, Trofimov suggests life should
not be stagnant and humans must be pressured to work harder and be motivated to succeed. Therefore, mirroring the lack of pressure on Russian
society which leads to a fall in social and economic progress. Furthermore, Pishchik, another middle–class man

Theme Of Order In The Canterbury Tales
Marissa Diaz
Professor Hadorn
British Literature
26 October 2017
Order Presented Through Chaucer "I think that people are most comfortable when the world is orderly. I think there's the sense that when you begin
questioning basic distinctions, such as the distinction between being male and being female, it represents a threat to the social order."– Andrew
Solomon. When it comes to order Geoffrey Chaucer has an interesting way of portraying the essence of order throughout The Canterbury Tales. His
characters seem to follow the social order at first glance, but as we look further into the tales we see just how out of line these characters are. Even
the character that is Chaucer is blind to the twistedness of his fellow passengers. Chaucer only sees the good in his travel companions, not the hidden
upheaval of the social order that was so strictly in place. Through discussion it was said how the social class was the foundation of everyday life during
the Middle Ages. The idea of Social class was a huge part in determining the role one would hold in the lives of medieval people. When a person of
the times would look at the aristocracy class and compare those people to the less than desirable lower class, the two were habitually regarded by
society as virtually different races. In The Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer is able to show the wide variety among the classes all intermingling on
this voyage. Chaucer is able to catch the subtle differences in almost every aspect of

Communist Party Essay : Manifesto Of The Communist Party
Manifesto of the Communist Party
There is a threat haunting Europe– a threat on communism. All of the powerful countries in Europe have created an alliance to fight communism. The
Pope and Tsar, the Metternich and Guizot, and the French Radicals and German police–spies have all turned against communism.
Is there a group that has not been condemned as communist by the powerful countries? Is there opposition that has not been thrown back by the
criticism of communism, against the more powerful and advanced opposition, as well as its counter revolutionary opponents?
Two things result from this fact:
Communism is already known by all European countries to be a power itself.
It is now time that Communists should openly present their views and their goals. Now Communists should meet the enemies against communism with
their own declaration.
Communists of different nationalities have now gathered in London and drafted the following declaration, to be published in different languages, such
as English, French, German, Italian, Flemish, and Danish.
I. Bourgeois and Proletarians
The history of all previously existing culture is the history of problems with social class.
Free people and slaves, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, the guild–master and journeyman, and the oppressor and oppressed were always against
each other, and this was an uninterrupted fight that eventually ended, either by a revolution from a large group of people, or in the fall of the classes.
In earlier times

The Industrial Revolution And The Age Of Revolution
The Age of Revolution, as defined by professor Jones, "is characterized by a general attitude that change could bring about improvements in all areas of
people's lives..." (text). What was unique about this attitude was that it came from the everyday people and not just the rulers–it was the opposite of
"big man history". Therefore, in terms of the Age, a revolution can be understood as the active and rapid act of capturing of this "improvement of life"
by the common people. Under this framework it can be understood that there were several revolutions throughout the Age of Revolution, which all
contributed to and were a result of the Age's burgeoning view. Two such revolutions essential to the Age were the French Revolution and the Industrial
Revolution. These two provide the most abundant resources to understand the Age in that they both are revolutions powered by the everyday people.
The French Revolution was a turning point for Europe from which there was no return. It set the mold for revolutions of the Age and showed just how
deeply ingrained and powerful the ideals of the Age could be in the Western World. The French Revolution finds its causes in the now cliched concept
that when the masses are displeased, the king is in trouble. However it is crucial to understand that the French Revolution established this cliche for the
West. The simplest way to chart out the atmosphere of France at the time, a look at the PICSET categories of France offers the clearest depiction.

Enslavement of the Individual in Capitalist Society as...
Bourgeois society enslaves the individual such that any attempt to transcend one's environmental limitations results in self–destruction. Nietzsche
"slave morality" theory is applicable to the works of Dostoyevsky, Mann, and Ibsen, and posits that an individual uprising under a bourgeois blanket
leads to reactivity, not activity. Though each man calls for individuals values to be raised in some way (in the case of Nietzsche, by an Гјber–mensch),
each understands the impossibility of that under bourgeois rule. Marx argues that the only way to restore individuality is for the proletariat to band
together and overthrow the society that hinders its freedom. Only then will slave morality be erased as individuals forge active change. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
This proposes that an individual is allowed to impose his own values on society. However, Raskolnikov's actions imply that he still operates out of a
slave mentality. He eats his soup "in a mechanical sort of way" (1, 6, p.86), and in the murder of the landlady he "almost mechanically struck her"
(1, 6, p.96). The crime seals Raskolnikov's isolation, which is necessary for an extraordinary man to set himself apart from the rest and defeat his
slave impulses; he tells his mother and sister, "I want to be alone. Better forget me altogether" (4, 3, p.328). However, even the self–sufficient
Svidrigaylov demonstrates a human requirement for the company of others, indicating his own lavishness: "And I shall be your slaveвЂ№for the rest
of my life" (6, 5, p.506). Further examples refute Raskolnikov's theory. He wonders "if man isn't really a beastвЂ№man in generalЕ the whole human
raceЕ then all the rest is just prejudice, just imagined fears" (1, 2, p.44). Raskolnikov's, or any single man's, inability to rise out of the morass of
bourgeois complacency is pointed out by a bar patron, who asks "Would you kill the old woman yourself?Е If you are not ready to do it yourself, it's
not a question of justice at all" (1, 6, p.86). The Raskolnikov does eventually kill her by himself, the important idea presented here is that no single
person has the strength or will to combat bourgeois morality by himself; rather, there

How I Met My Husband
Patrick Silva
AP Lit
Period 4
Mr. Schmitz
October 11, 2012
How I Met My Husband Thesis Paper The theme of Alice Munro's story "How I met my Husband" is Social expectations mold individual
circumstances. Edie, a fifteen year old housemaid in the lower class of society has qualities and talents that demonstrate a skill set of aristocracy.
"Have a house without pie, be ashamed until you die" is a quoted statement that Edie 's mother used to say to her that Mrs. Peebles was not very
familiar with. Edie was astonished when Mrs. Peebles admitted that she could not make pie crust and said it was "the most amazing thing she ever
heard a woman admit." She of course could make pie crust, along with many other baking related foods, which was ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
An interrogation erupted and Ms. Kelling soon dug out answers from Edie, who was not going to lie, or deny that any intimate action took place.
Instead of releasing her anger at Mr. Watters, who left without warning and cheated on her, she instantly addresses her anger to Edie with curses
along with many other demeaning words. Ms. Kelling speaks to Edie as she should have known she was going to take such actions with Mr. Watters,
as she said "I am not surprised, I knew by the look of her as soon as I saw her". Ms. Kelling is judging Edie based on her social class, calling her a "little
country tramp", inferring that all women of that class are good for nothing and worthless. When someone is knowledgeable and feels acquainted
with dealing amidst a certain stage or point in life, they tend to be more successful than someone who feels out of place or inexperienced. In the
story, Edie stated that her parents made the effort and sent her to high school, but she could not cope with the atmosphere after a year of trying which
resulted in her failure. Edie is a smart girl, although shown as naive in the story, she shines in places where even the educated might not. She
illustrates her experience in cooking and creativity, where people even of a higher class cannot show. People who are educated may look down at
others and expect them to fail at certain things that they believe cannot be done by someone who is not knowledgeable.

Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee
In her seminal novel To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee introduces many racial controversies that
continue to plague America today. Specifically, Tom Robinson's conviction: One summer
morning, a poor white woman named Mayella Ewell invited black laborer Tom Robinson to
perform manual labor for her. Soon, she begins to harbor a romantic attraction towards him.
Unfortunately, such an advance is taboo in their society, and when Mayella is caught, her family
quickly constructs a narrative of Tom Robinson raping Mayella. In their town, a black man is
virtually unable to defend himself against such an accusation, and Tom Robinson is summarily
convicted, sentenced, and killed in a botched escape attempt.
The central question that these events pose is a difficult one: How could the court
administrators and prosecutors convict Tom Robinson on what is obviously a trumped up
charge? Many of these men were moral exemplars in their community, commonly thought of
as "good" men. How could these good men do such an evil thing? We commonly think of the
actions of Bob Ewell and the racist community as "evil"–but evil by what standards? In their
community, many of the jurors and mob who came to the cell were seen as upstanding citizens.

Instead, we must interrogate the very nature of good and evil–what do these valuations entail,
and how do they apply to the real world? How can we explain their actions?
Nietzsche's account of moral norms
It is here that the

What Is The Synopsis Of Ang Tunay Na Ina
FILM ANALYSIS
Ang Tunay na Ina is a Filipino melodrama, directed and written by Octavio Silos. The major casts of the film are Rosario Moreno as Magdalena,
Rudy Concepcion as Roberto, Tita Duran as Tita, Quiel Segovia as Antonio, Dona Luisa as Nati Rubi, Don Alberto as Precioso Palma, Naty
Bernardo as Aling Andang. This is one of the few films that survived from World War II. This is also one of the films that they were able to restore.
The film focuses on how Magdalena is longing for her lost daughter. Her daughter is the only reason why she felt incomplete and unhappy that is
why she tried to find her. I believe, that is what how a real mother will feel. As she finds her daughter, the film emphasized how she proved that she
is the real mother of Tita, not only by blood but also by heart. And as the title says, Ang Tunay na Ina, it does not only define a real mother on its
own by her responsibilities and actions but also by the way she feels towards her children. Don Alberto and Dona Luisa was talking about what to do
with the baby of Magdalena as she was said to have a child without being married during was the introduction of the film. It started this way to show
that they ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Moreover, the film is similar with Singin' in the Rain as it is a musical, it involves singing, and the style of singing their is the same as the style
used in this film. On the other hand, the film is very different from the recent films shown in class, in terms of quality and plot. Of course, the film in
terms of quality, it needs a lot of improvement because some parts were incomprehensible just like other old films. In addition, the plot's simplicity is
the same as the ones from the first few films. On the other hand, its differences from the recent films are very obvious. From its quality to its plot, it is
indeed

Noblemen In Medieval Society
Nobleman: Medieval Society The Oxford dictionary's meaning of noble is, "belonging to a hereditary class with high social or political status;
aristocratic." This definition fits the description of noblemen in medieval society from 1000–1300 C.E. Nobles were one of the many traditional
medieval social groups (Kagan, Ozment, and Turner, 202). There were quite a few words that described the life of a nobleman: knights, warriors,
sportsmen, courtly love, and wealth. Though many nobles inherited their lifestyle, they have not lived without a profession. Knighthood, along with
other responsibilities, defined a nobleman. A knight was a nobleman who could display high distinctiveness for chivalry. Chivalry was a code of
arms that also taught nobles to be respectful and honorable. Female nobles had also followed chivalry, yet during the twelfth century it was illegal
for a woman to be a knight (Waterman, Lynn). Chivalry was originally devised because knights had crude and aggressive behavior ("The Life of the
People in the High Middle Ages"). The clergy teach nobles during their childhood how they should act and treat others. Therefore, a child's life was
also changed by their class. A noble's childhood during infancy to around seven years consisted mostly of play. After that stage of their life, the church
usually placed the boys into manors and castles to begin the training of knighthood (Kagan, Ozment, and Turner, 203). Children would learn to serve
lords and knights. Beginning

Feudalism And The Feudal System
Knights and kings are the first thing that many people think of regarding medieval times. However, the system was quite different and was called
feudalism. Feudalism was a system that helped the king keep control of his kingdom and be able to protect his country. The feudal system was divided
into four levels, and began around 900 A.D. and ended around 1400 A.D.Feudalism began in England when the Romans, who were in control of the
people, left and the country became unstable. The Germanic tribes who inhabited the territory were constantly having civil wars, and had many
problems. To solve that problem, and to develop a system of to defend their country, they developed feudalism as a form of government (Britton).
Feudalism was a socio–political hierarchy that had four different ranks. This was a very simplistic and logical form of government (Bishop 95). It
was a fairly weak form of government because it was mainly established by trust in between the kings and the barons (Bishop 97). Feudalism was
prominent in Europe for many years, and it ended around 1400 A.D. due to kings becoming more powerful. The kings were able to protect themselves
without having barons because of the technology of guns. Also, the printing machine and better education made it easier for the king to manage his
land without the barons and knights. The Black Death in the mid 14th century also played a big role in the fall of feudalism because many of the serfs
died, making it harder for the knights

Piers Plowman Dbq
Jonathan Knowles Rm. 223 4/13/16 Document 1 Excerpt from Piers Plowman Question: What economic trap did peasants suffer from according to
lines 3 – 4? 3: Changed with their children, and chief lord's rent 4: What by spinning they save, they spend it in house – hire Answer: The economic
trap that is stated in this poem, translated by Terence Tiller, to the peasants is a couple of things. First, in the 3rd line, it states,"Charged with their
children, and chief lords rent," which is implying that they must pay for their children and also pay or rent the land that they live on which is granted
to them by the lords. In line 4 it states,"What by spinning they save, they spend it in house – hire." This is stating that the peasants would have to also
pay for their houses damages while being stressed by all the other cluttered things they must pay for. They overall economic trap for the peasants is
them paying others and for themselves to live a somewhat healthy life, such as lords and vassals and for their children. Document 2 Quotation from
Juan Ruiz What does the writer mean by a man not being able to ,"call himself his own master?" Question: Answer: The writer means that compared to
a man with excessive wealth being honorable and respected, the man that is penniless cannot call himself his own master. This implies that while the
man with wealth is the ruler, the penniless man is the one being ruled. The man with no money cannot call himself his own

Analogy of Wynnere and Wastoure in the Middle of the 14th...
Every where in life there are opposite forces which cannot exist with out one another. These things, whether opposing actions or opposing thoughts,
often in the end cannot exist without one another. For if in the end one prevailed, there would be an unbalance. You cannot have ying without yang or
life without death. In Wynnere and Wastourethere is a harmony between the two characters. While this harmony may be unclear to both of the
characters, it becomes evident after each volley of arguments that there is no winner in this battle. Wynnere cannot exist without Wastoure.
Wynnere and Wastoure is a book steeped in the social problems of the time. The poem is dated from 1352 to 1353. The book was written around the
end of the black plague ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Winner on the other hand fails to recognize that because of this he is able to take advantage of these cheap properties and collect more wealth. This is
a prime example of how Winner needs Waster. Winner counters Wasters argument that his spending spreads the wealth by trying to point out that
Wasters wastefulness is source of the shortage which causes the poor to be poor.
Waster then tries to validate his extravagance by countering with his generosity. He tries to exonerate his extravagance by giving the excess to the
poor and providing work for the poor from the creation of extravagant feasts and clothes. Winner counters by saying that no matter what excess is
given to the poor if the food and clothes were not extravagant, there would be much more to go around. Winner provides a valid point by stating this,
but as Winner says this he backs himself into a corner. If money is saved it does nothing but enrich the friars and other merchants. It does not serve the
poor any better then extravagant spending. Here again the reader sees a striking similarity between the two extremes, and it becomes even more evident
that neither extreme is correct. The only correct solution can be achieved through meeting in the middle of these two extremes. Neither Winner nor
Waster is always correct.
Up to this point both Winner and Waster have proved that neither of the two sides is absolutely correct. Their

Conflict In A Tale Of Two Cities By Charles Dickens And...
As with any historical fiction of work of literature, conflict is a neccesary element in a novel. It is mainly used to build plot and suspense. A Tale of
Two Cities written by Charles Dickens and Ivanhoe by Sir Walter Scott are both good examples of novels in which conflicts between play an important
role and in this novel it is mainly the struggles between social groups which are of big importance. There are a lot of differences but also similarities
concerning the points of view of the narrators on the struggles between the social groups. In this essay I will discuss these differences and similarities
between the opinions of Sir Walter Scott and Charles Dickens on social conflicts.
Dickens used the development of a conflict between the French lower class and the French government and aristocracy to build plot and suspense. The
nobility (the government and aristocracy) is extremely rich and the French lower class are exactly the opposite, very poor. The French lower class
suffered for a long time under the tight rulings and restraints of the French government and aristocracy. The lives of ignorant French poor people are
described by Charles Dickens as horrendous:
"And who among the company at Monsignor's reception in that seventeen hundred and eightieth year of our Lord, coud possibly doubt, that a system
rooted in a frizzled hangman, powdered and gold–laced, pumped, and white–silk stockinet, would see the very stars out!" [ВЃвЂє] 1ВЃВќ
The deaths of seemingly worthess

, Cultures And Ideas In Sir Gawain And The Green Knight

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Angie Brown

More from Angie Brown (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

, Cultures And Ideas In Sir Gawain And The Green Knight