Essay On Pragmatic Track

Essay On Pragmatic Track
How then, in the process of language acquisition, is it possible for learners to bridge this gap
between grammatical/syntax systems and sociolinguistic/pragmatic systems? Romero Trillo (2002),
for example, contends that foreign language learners utilize two tracks in their linguistic
development: a formal and a pragmatic track. The formal track is affiliated with the acquisition of
the phonological, grammatical and semantic features of the target language. On the other hand, the
pragmatic track is related to the social use of the language as it is used in different contexts and
registers. Naturalistic acquisition accounts for native speakers' development of both tracks.
However, for language learners, both formal and pragmatic tracks are typically developed through
formal instruction, due to the fact that most language ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Each of these four approaches will be briefly reviewed
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Example Of Pragmatic Equivalence
Over decades, the concern of translators and scholars of language use have transformed piecemeal
from the language itself to its intended meanings to solve the problems of misunderstanding and
ambiguity. Pragmatic Equivalence is one of the prominent studies, which contributes to deal with
this matter. Pragmatics itself is an independent branch of language studies which "studies the use of
language in human communication as determined by the conditions of society." (Mey, 2001, p.6)
However, equivalence means to give a similar impact from the source text on the target reader.
Accordingly, the Pragmatic Equivalence studies seek to translate what the source writer or speaker
really means in particular situations, and according to special conditions, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Grice has presumed that the participants of the same speech or conversation try most of time to be
honest, pertinent, "informative" and obvious. Unlike the "politeness principle" (PP), which has been
known to have some reservations about human communicational speeches, Grice has claimed that
"we need the CP to help to account (to).. the relation between sense and force; and this kind of
explanation is particularly welcome where it solves." (Leech, 1983, P.80) In 1975, Grice has firstly
suggested the concept of the CP in his article "Logic and Conversation"; in which the roles of the
speakers and listeners are determined to have effective communications, and later on that will help
translators in conveying the message of the author to the readers. The principle can be divided into
these next–four maxims:
(i) Maxim of quality: a type of maxims, in which the speaker expects the hearer to be explicit and
real. For example; when the speaker is making a " cake", and he needs to add some sugar as one of
its ingredients, then the listener is expected to handle the speaker the sugar box; not the salt nor
pepper ones. (Grice, 1975, pp.

Theories Of Pragmatics
Why are there so many theories in pragmatics concerning meaning in language? Why is the study of
language use crucial to understanding meaning in language? How does the development over time
of the main theories in pragmatics show a greater understanding of language use? Introduction First
of all, what do we understand with meaning? What is it? Meaning seems like a very straightforward
concept but it is very obscure indeed. As human beings we are designed to acquire meaning from the
world, it allows us make a conceptualization of the world. It is the most important feature of
language, as the main purpose of language is to communicate with each other, in other words, to
know what we "mean". This looks quite straightforward and obvious as I have mentioned before,
but what makes meaning so hard to understand is the little consciousness that we have of the
knowledge and principles that govern our communicative ability that make us humans. As Aristotle
said in Politics, "Man is by nature a social animal; an individual who is unsocial naturally ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The term "context" is vast, but it can be defined as the elements that surround an utterance and
determine its meaning. The meaning of the utterances is inferred, that means that the meaning is
implicit and is interpreted subjectively which also affects to the number of interpretations that can
derive from one context. One same sentence can have two different meaning in a different context.
For instance, consider two people, Jane and Ron, who have just started dating. If Ron says to Jane at
the end of the night, "I like you a lot." Jane will most likely feel great about the situation. But
imagine that Jane and Ron have been dating for some weeks now, and Jane asks, "Do you love me?"
Now if Ron says, "I like you a lot," her reaction will most definitely be very different, as Ron's
statement would be taken as a negative

Semiotic Or Semilogical Theory Of Communication
1. INTRODUCTION
Communication serves a variety of purposes and takes on a variety of forms; and is so much more
than merely a transmission of information. Often communication includes ambiguous forms (which
may be either deliberate or spontaneous). How is one to interpret a speaker's utterances and how is
this interpretation done? The Relevance Theory of Sperber and Wilson (1986) – to be explored in
this paper – proposes an interpretation of utterances based on a theory in pragmatics about how a
hearer interprets a speaker's utterances.
In the past, two models have been put forward to explain how communication is processed. They are
as follows:
1.1. The Code Model
This model (also known as the Shannon–Weaver model (1949)) presents ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
their shared knowledge). There is therefore a certain degree of reliance on the hearer making the
right inferences from what is not explicitly communicated. This may be diagrammatised as follows:
Speaker's thought/intention + context–mediated information –> encoded –> transmitted –> decoded
+ context mediated information –> intention/thought understood.
Inference may be understood from the following example: The message 'Tom has bought the Times'
requires contextual knowledge for it to be understood – i.e. that 'the Times' is the name of a
newspaper publication. Also, it is to be inferred from the statement that rather than buying the entire
press enterprise, Tom has merely bought one issue, and probably the issue of the day in question.
The Inferential model includes Grice's model of implicature (i.e. what is meant, suggested or hinted
at but not overtly stated). Therefore, in order for communication to be successful, Grice proposed
the Cooperative Principle which includes the maxims of quantity, quality relevance and manner. The
Relevance theory develops the maxim of relevance.
With regards to metaphorical language, there is no sharp dividing line between it and the literal.
"The same cognitive processes are involved in understanding all utterances. This distinguishes our
view from the classical (Aristotelian) view of figurative language where figurative utterances

An Analysis of the Characters' Relationship Development in...
An Analysis of the Characters' Relationship Development in Roman Holiday from the Perspective
of Politeness Principle 1. Introduction Roman Holiday is a classical romance–comedy film in which
a reporter falls in love with a runaway European princess. As a very influential film, Roman Holiday
makes a deep impression on the audience with its funny plots and expressive dialogues. However,
most of the critics attribute its success to the plot arrangement and actors' performance. As far as the
author concern, the film dialogues also plays an important role. Moreover, many scholars, who are
engaged in linguistic studies, begin to apply linguistic approach to analyze film dialogues, the
results are interesting and inspiring. Some critics ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Since there are many polite and courteous dialogues in Roman Holiday, which, to some extent,
correspond to the above maxims. Therefore, the followings are the practical analysis of the
dialogues in Roman Holiday on the basis of the six maxims of Leech's Politeness Principle.
3.Analysis of the dialogues in Roman Holiday 3.1 Manifestation of Tact Maxim in Roman Holiday
Tact Maxim is oriented towards other's interests, wants and needs. It is often used in directive
situations, such as requests, which are often indirect, tentative, giving an opportunity to refuse, and
also minimizing speaker's imposition on hearer. It has positive and negative sub–maxims: Minimize
the cost to other. Maximize the benefit to other. In the film, there are many conversations observing
this maxim. When poor Joe wants to borrow some money from the landlord Giovanni so as to take
the princess out down the town and make an exclusive interview on her. Joe asked in an indirect
way: Joe: Swell! Thanks a lot. Oh er, Giovanni, er... How would you like to make some money?
Giovanni: Money? Joe: Yeah. That's the stuff. Now look, I've got a sure thing: double your money
back in two days. Giovanni: Double my money? Joe: Yeah well, I need a little investment capital to
swing the deal. Now, if you'll just lend me a little cash, I... In fact,

Pragmatics Case Study
Topic:
"The role of Pragmatics in English Language Teaching"
Purpose:
The aim of this study would be:
To analyze and identify the challenges a student can face while learning pragmatics in an ELT
classroom.
To revise and inspect the prevailing theories and methods of teaching Pragmatics in an English
Language classroom
To put forward my personal perspective of Pragmatics and its applications.
Statement of Problem:
To investigate the negligence of the use of Pragmatics in ELT and to check how teachers and
lecturers will unlock the keys to culturally appropriate communication.
Background:
The inherent concept of practice in both explicit and implicit instruction seemingly provides both
teachers and learners with deeper and insightful enlightenments ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Rationale of the study:
Currently some learners of English learn the language in foreign environments, where English is not
the language of the surrounding culture. For example in Pakistan the learner may learn English as
foreign language challenged by a lack of comprehensible input that needs to be supplied artificially
by the teacher. This dynamic may lead to a pragmatic competence that it is limited to what can be
taught in the classroom.
The audience of this research is members of the teaching community: ESL/EFL teachers native or
non–native speakers of English, TESOL students, and professors of different universities in
Pakistan. And I hope that teachers and learners will be motivated to use Pragmatics in their language
lessons.
Limitations of

Pragmatic Equivalence In Translation
Translation is considered as more deeper than exchanging lexical and grammatical terms . A
translator 's main goal is to convey the message of the source text with the same meaning and
intention . He can achieve this goal when he applies pragmatic equivalence. Pragmatic equivalence
can be defined as : the ability of the translator to convey the source language to target language with
the same intention of the text producer and equivalent words and same affection to the reader .
Mainly , pragmatics has to do with the intention of speakers . It studies why sentences are used and
studies also the context of utterance and environment surrounding each sentence used in the
situation . Translator should give attention to different types of beyond meanings that arise from
what's literally said , this can go under term of " implicit meaning " which has relation with
pragmatics . Moreover , Speaker's intentions has to go with elements of structure and texture . In
addition . equivalence has an important role in translation process . And the translator will achieve
his goal of exchange using equivalence . Since, translation is considered as more deeper than
exchanging lexical and grammatical ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This research paper will examine the linguistic theories of speech act and Gricean maxims and their
relations to pragmatic equivalence . It will provide linguist's opinions about types of speech act and
felicity conditions and the maxims and the implicature from different sources . This paper assists the
translator to understand the theories and will make him able to convey the implied meaning intended
by the speaker not the literal meaning of the words only

Importance Of Pragmatic Awareness
The premise of this essay is to address the importance of the general development of pragmatic
awareness and its instillation in our students in order for them to comprehend pragmatic meaning
when they encounter it outside our classrooms. I believe that with the increasing advancement in
technology, the acceleration of globalization in our world, and the worldwide use of English as the
standard for communication, we teachers need to help second language students develop pragmatic
awareness of English language norms in ELL contexts. Overall, the purpose of this paper is to
examine ways in which teachers can further develop these students to become pragmatically
competent with whatever relevant linguistic resources they have, for I expect that a non–native
speaker of English with pragmatic incompetence may encounter professional failure in the future.
Through learning pragmatics, the English speakers' intercultural communication competence should
be raised. Their Pragmatic Competence would be better because of knowing cultural differences and
being aware of the significance in appropriate languages. In other words, the teaching and learning
of pragmatics releases the difficulties of international communications for both native and non–
native speakers.
Hughes and Allen (61) define pragmatics as a branch of linguistics mandated with handling
language use and contextual uses. For both the first and second language learners, pragmatics aim at
addressing issues related to text

The Concept Of Pragmatics
1.1. Preliminaries
Despite its scientific acclaim, the notion of pragmatics remains somewhat ambiguous and is still
difficult to define. This holds for its readings in everyday discourse as well as in scholarly contexts.
Nonetheless, when we refer to attitudes and modes of behavior as pragmatic, we mean that they
have a factual kind of orientation in common. People who act pragmatically or take a pragmatic
perspective generally have a preference for a practical, matter of fact and realistic rather than a
theoretical, speculative and idealistic way of approaching imminent problems and handling
everyday affairs. To put it differently, they share a concrete, situation–dependent approach geared to
action and usage rather than an abstract, situation–independent ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Such an understanding of pragmatics as an attitude in non–scientific discourse has obviously left its
traces in scientific definitions of the term. By and large we can say that in semiotics and philosophy,
pragmatic characterizes those theoretical and methodological approaches that are oriented toward
use and context rather than toward some system, and that they regard use and context as creating a
high degree of analytical surplus. While essentially the same is true for linguistics in general, there
is no commonly accepted definition of pragmatics in linguistics which would refer to a single,
unified and homogeneous field of study. In contemporary linguistics, we can identify a narrow and a
broad way of delineating pragmatics. According to the narrow view, pragmatics is understood as the
systematic investigation of what and how people mean when they use language as a vehicle of
action in a particular context and with a particular goal in mind. Pragmatics is fundamentally
concerned with communicative action in any kind of context. The multifaceted research paradigm of
pragmatics has provided new directions and perspectives in the arts and humanities, philosophy,
cognitive science, computer science

Post Gricean Pragmatics Essay
A few of these lectures were published as papers through the years (1968, 1969, 1975, 1978)
(Turner, 2009 :253). In general, Gricean pragmatics proposes that human verbal communication is a
cooperative activity. Theoretically, the participants follow cooperative and conversational maxims of
quantity, quality, relation and manner. Additionally, He draws a distinction between what is said and
what is implicated. This work, in fact, is the core of his theory of meaning which was first presented
in Grices's 1957 paper Meaning (Cummings, 2010:182). Grice's viewpoint of utterance
interpretation exceeds the code model of communication. Thus, he introduced the inferential model
of communication (see 2.3.4) (Ifantidou, 2001:38). Grice's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Linguists revealed an overwhelming interest in the relevance– theoretic program which was outlined
with more specific details in two works Relevance Theory: Some Basic Distinctions and Discourse
Applications of Relevance Theory (Rouchota and Jucker, 1998:1). The theory kept evolving.
Recently, it has been updated by Wilson and Sperber in 2004 and Wilson in 2010. At the same time,
Clark's book published in 2013 which is entitled Relevance Theory can be considered as an
introductory textbook to the theory (Huang,

Three Approaches Of Pragmatics
According to Schmitt (2010), there are two approaches of pragmatics, a cognitive or psychological
approach which is exploring the relation between linguistic meaning of utterances, the
decontextualized, what speakers mean by their utterances on a particular situation and how hearer
interpret those utterances on those particular situations. Cognitive approach was developed by
philosophers Austin, Searle, and Grice. On the other hand, social pragmatics approach which
focuses on the communicative exchanges between individuals in social, cultural and other
contextual factors. Brown and Levinson (1978 – 1987) introduced face model of politeness to this
approach.
The main objective of pragmatics is to study on how non–native speakers comprehend and produce
speech acts in a target language. Speech act is not the whole of pragmatics, but is perhaps currently
the most important part of the subject. Many of the topics addressed in both narrow and broad views
derive from three major pragmatic theories: Speech Acts, Conversational Implicatures, ... Show
In other words, indirectness is a widely used conversational strategy, hence people reduce the
unpleasant message contained in requests and other statement. In indirect speech acts the speaker
communicates to the hearer more than he actually says by way of depending on their mutually
shared background information either both linguistic and nonlinguistic together with the powers of
rationality and inference on the part of the hearer. To be more specific, to explain the indirect speech
acts can be say it is "a theory of speech acts certain general principles of cooperative conversation"
(Searle, 1979, p. 31–32). As Thomas (1995) people use indirect strategies whenever they want to
reach aims from their hearers, when speakers want to increase the force of the message
communicated, or when want to make their speech more

Two Approaches Of Pragmatics
According to Schmitt (2010), there are two approaches of pragmatics, a cognitive or psychological
approach which is exploring the relation between linguistic meaning of utterances, the
decontextualized, what speakers mean by their utterances on a particular situation and how hearer
interpret those utterances on those particular situations. Cognitive approach was developed by
philosophers Austin, Searle, and Grice. On the other hand, social pragmatics approach which
focuses on the communicative exchanges between individuals in social, cultural and other
contextual factors. Brown and Levinson (1978 – 1987) introduced face model of politeness to this
approach.
The main objective of pragmatics is to study on how non–native speakers comprehend and produce
speech acts in a target language. Speech act is not the whole of pragmatics, but is perhaps currently
the most important part of the subject. Many of the topics addressed in both narrow and broad views
derive from three major pragmatic theories: Speech Acts, Conversational Implicatures, ... Show
In other words, indirectness is a widely used conversational strategy, hence people reduce the
unpleasant message contained in requests and other statement. In indirect speech acts the speaker
communicates to the hearer more than he actually says by way of depending on their mutually
shared background information either both linguistic and nonlinguistic together with the powers of
rationality and inference on the part of the hearer. To be more specific, to explain the indirect speech
acts can be say it is "a theory of speech acts certain general principles of cooperative conversation"
(Searle, 1979, p. 31–32). As Thomas (1995) people use indirect strategies whenever they want to
reach aims from their hearers, when speakers want to increase the force of the message
communicated, or when want to make their speech more

Pragmatic Analysis of Seinfeld's the Contest
Materia
Lingüística
Paper
Pragmatic Analysis of
Seinfeld
"The Contest"
Alumno: Juan Wickenhagen
Profesora: Karen De Francesco
CAFI
2012
Index
Abstract............................................................2
Introduction........................................................3
Corpus..............................................................4
Conclusion.......................................................16
Bibliography......................................................17
Annex:
Seinfeld "The Contest" : Full Synopsis....................18
Abstract
This paper focuses on the pragmatic analysis of an episode of the American sitcom "Seinfeld" called
"The Contest". In order to carry out the work several fragments were selected from the episode's
script, which were analyzed using as theoretical framework the concepts taken from the book
"Pragmatics" by George Yule. The interactions of those ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
You could sell out Madison Square Garden. Thousands of people could watch you! You could be a
big star!
On the other hand, the use of anaphoric reference is mainly used to refer to George's mother since
she becomes the starting point of the plot's dramatic action when George confess to his friends that

his mother had "caught" him. There are many examples as regards that in the first part of the
episode:
JERRY: So, what did she do?
GEORGE: First she screams, "George, what are you doing?! My God!"(...)
ELAINE: (Wide–eyed) So, she fell?
ELAINE: (Between chuckles) How is she?
GEORGE: (Somewhat angered) She's in traction.
Inclusive and Exclusive we
In this passage, Jerry uses the so–called "exclusive we" (speaker plus other(s), excluding addressee)
to state the differences between men and women as regards masturbation:
JERRY: We have to do it. It's part of our lifestyle. It's like, uh...shaving.
Both "we" in this sentence refer to "men" or "men's world" as a way of keeping Elaine, the only
woman in the group of friends, out of the contest.
Yet later on in the story, Jerry uses what Yules calls "inclusive we" (speaker and addressee included)
to include Elaine in the bet, and after "they" (men) allowed her to compete in such a contest:
JERRY: Well, obviously, we all know each other very well, (Elaine slightly laughs) I'm sure that
we'll all feel comfortable within the confines of the honor system.
Both "we" in this sentence do not refer to men

What Is Pragmatic Equivalence?
Pragmatics is "the study of the purposes for which sentences is used, of the real world conditions
under which a sentence may be appropriately used as an utterance" (Hatim, Basil (1992), p.59).
Pragmatic Equivalence as a theory demonstrates the close relation between the meaning of a text in
the source language and the target language. Speech Act Theory and Grice's Cooperative Principle
set the basics of linguistics related with translation studies in terms of the meaning and its effect
between two different languages, the meaning and intentionality are primary elements to any
translator seeks to transfer the exact message of the text in the source language . Speech Act Theory
by Austin (1962) demonstrates how words in an utterance carry out ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The performance of the act is the main object in that utterance. The circumstances; in which the
utterances are uttered are important, they have to be appropriate. The speakers have to perform in a
certain way; that correspond to the action " whether 'physical' or 'mental' action ". (Austin,1962,p.8).
Austin (1962) elaborates that; the action can be performed by other ways, not only by a
performative utterance. The circumstances in different actions have to correspond to the action, they
describe.When the speakers objecting, they can make something different, from the one in their
mind. For instance, "awe inspiring performatives, such as ' I promise' ", so the action and the
utterance must be serious when uttering it. This is basically related to the significance of an
utterance.Promising is one of the performatives. In uttering a promise, the speaker must have
intention, in order to make this utterance; gives the right idea or impression. A performative promise
does not involve the statement, that one is promising. Such explicit performative utterance, does not
describe what the speaker is doing or, it does not mean that the speaker starts doing that action.
(Austin, 1962,

Essay about Pragmatic Develpment in a Second Language
In line with the fact that speech acts of suggestion themselves have not been studied in the same
capacity as other speech acts (Schmidt, et al., 1995), L2 pragmatics literature on suggestions is also
quite limited. Only a small number of researchers have made attempts to explicitly address
suggestions, how they are used in classroom interaction, and teacher–student conversations in
conferences. Overall, a unanimous agreement exists among the available research (Bardovi–Harlig
and Hartford, 1990, 1993; Bardovi–Harlig, 1996; Rintell, 1979; Bell, 1998; Matsumura, 2001) that
L2 learners fall short of institutional expectations to use pragmatic strategies effectively because of a
lack of the socio–cultural and sociolinguistic knowledge ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
She found that utterances used to request conveyed more deference than utterances used to suggest.
Banerjee and Carrell (1988) reported that nonnative speakers were significantly less likely to make
suggestions in slightly embarrassing and potentially embarrassing situations than native speakers.
They also found that nonnative speakers might unintentionally appear to be impolite or at least less
polite when making suggestions. Based on their findings, Banerjee and Carrell called on teachers "to
sensitize learners to the fine shades of meaning as they learn to use various syntactic structures (p.
346)" and recommended that pragmatics be integrated into other aspects of language teaching, for
example, along with modals, question forms, conditionals, and imperatives. Bell (1998) also studies
the speech act of suggestion in interlanguage development. He/she examines the production of three
speech acts including: requests, suggestion, and disagreements. Bell (1998) compares the requests
and suggestions of a group of high–beginning level Korean ESL students. He found that while these
students demonstrated an increase in the level of politeness in their expression of disagreements,
these disagreement were still considered too direct and unmitigated by the hearers. Matsumura
(2001) examines Japanese ESL students use of the speech acts of advice and suggestion. He finds
that students tended to use direct speech in these acts even when

Literature Review Of Pragmatic Competence
Introduction: In foreign language education and assessment, pragmatic competence has been known
as an essential component of communicative language ability (Canale and Swain 1980; Bachman
1990). Although the fact that many models of communicative language ability included pragmatic
competence since the 1980s (Bachman 1990; Canale and Swain 1980; Savignon 1983), but Röver
(2005) and McNamara plus Röver (2006) point out that pragmatic competence assessment is still in
its infancy. This paper is an attempt to present a literature review of pragmatic competence
assessment. At first, a preliminary aspect of assessing pragmatic competence are presented. Second,
the researcher provides a research–based review of pragmatic competence assessment. Third, the
biggest part of the paper has been given to the approaches and strategies of assessing pragmatic
competence that can be used and applied by researchers. Finally, hints about how to conduct an
assessment as well as the rating process are reported in order to help teachers to assess this
important component of the language. Research–based assessment of pragmatic competence: Oller
(1979) first introduced the notion of a pragmatic proficiency test and set two constraints for this kind
of test. First, processing of language by examinees on ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Cohen (2010) presents several points about the reasons of assessing pragmatic competence. First,
the assessment of pragmatic competence sends a message to the students that it is valued and
important. Second, presenting a test of pragmatic competence may motivate the students to study it.
Third, the assessment can give a benefit also to teachers to be able to measure their students' control
of such an important component of language and to see if the students were able to acquire the
material that they are teaching

The Importance Of Second Language Pragmatics
The relationship between L2 learners' grammatical competence and pragmatic understanding makes
it clear why many researchers have focused on the acquisition of different dimensions of second
language pragmatics for more than three decades. In addition, the development of knowledge and
telecommunications are changing all aspects of life and consequently language. One of the most
significant changes that this digital innovation has brought is a changeover in how students write
and communicate. Email as an important medium of language to study creates a novel area for the
writing process. For this reason, the researcher conducted this study to explore the effect of teaching
explicit versus implicit pragmatic instruction on upper–intermediate EFL learners' email writing
development.
2.1 Interlanguage pragmatics (ILP)
Kasper and Roever (2005) asserted that to foreign and second language learners the understanding
of second language pragmatics could be an important difficulty because it typically entails learning
"not only how to do things with target language words but also how communicative actions and the
'words' that implement them are both responsive to and shape situations, activities, and social
relationships" (p. 317).
Research in the area of ILP is comprised of two groups of studies: interventionist studies and non–
interventionist/descriptive studies. According to Ross (2005), interventionist ILP research, as a
subset of instructed SLA research is known by three

Violation Of The Maxims Of Cooperative Principle
Chapter –I
For the Degree of
Doctor of Philosophy in English (Ph. D.)
Research Topic
Violation of the Maxims of Cooperative Principle in
Samuel Beckett's Selected Plays.
Research Student
Mr. Mundhe Ganesh Balavantrao
Research Guide
Dr. B. A. Jarange
Place of Research
Institute of Advanced Studies in English, Pune
CONTENTS
1) Introduction
2) Rationale of the Study
3) Hypothesis
4) Review of the Research Work
5) Aims and Objectives of the Research Project
6) Data, Methodology and Techniques
7) Plan of Thesis
I) Chapter – I (Introduction)
II) Chapter – II (Theoretical Framework)
III) Chapter – III (Analysis of the play Endgame)
IV) Chapter – IV (Analysis of the play Waiting for Godot)
V) Chapter – V (Analysis of the plays Happy Days )
VI) Chapter –VI (Conclusion and pedagogical implications)

8) Scope And Limitations of the Study
9) Significance of the Study
10) Conclusion
CHAPTER – I
Introduction:
The main aim of the present research is to study how Pragmatics works as a torch in the appreciation
of literature. Pragmatics is associated with the study of meaning as communicated by a speaker and
interpreted by a listener. This type of study necessarily involves the interpretation of what people
mean in a particular context and how the context influences what is said. It requires a consideration
of how the speakers organize what they want to say and under what circumstances. It also focuses
on the social, political and ethical aspects of

A Lexical Pragmatic Analysis of Proverbs in Femi...
This essay is a pragmatic reading of moral and socio–political decadence in Femi Osofisan's
Midnight Hotel. It does this by analyzing ten out of twenty–five proverbs deployed in the text. In
analyzing the proverbs, this essay observes that each has at least an ad hoc constituent which
requires semantic modulation to get at the meanings of the proverbs. This modulation is not
arbitrary, but contextually negotiated until the reader reaches his optimal relevance.
Wilson and Carston argue that metaphors are cases of ad hoc constructions (7), for instance, when a
speaker says, 'The boy is a lion'. While a literary scholar would see this as metaphorical, Wilson and
Carston believe that the above sentence is a case of the use of an ad hoc ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
One of such is with Ossie Onuorah Enekwe where he says that:
To get desperately close to the spectator, to each and every one I have trapped in the darkness or half
light, to penetrate very close and intimate, like a knife in the ribs. I want to make that spectator
happy but uncomfortable. I want to turn him open, guts and all, spice him, cook him in the filthy,
stinking broil of our history. I want him washed inside out, in the naked truth, and then I sew him
back again a different man. (18)
The playwright's closeness to a reader of Midnight Hotel is predicated on the contemporary subject
matters raised in the text. It is true the essence of the play is to effect a social change (as it is with
most literary works), but this change cannot occur if the reader finds it difficult to comprehend what
the text says. Thus this essay lends a hand in that direction, by working out an easy, systematic,
pragmatic format for understanding Osofisan's Midnight Hotel.
Commenting on the playwright's art, Awodiya submits that "Osofisan is prolific and theatrically
fertile in creating flexible dramatic forms that have great stage adaptability" (15). Awodiya further
notes Osofisan's penchant for invoking traditional African elements of music, dance, songs, mime
and improvisation (15). One of such is proverbs with which he attaches the African sense. Awodiya
acknowledges that

Essay On Iceberg Theory
One way of looking at Hemingway's (1932) "Iceberg Theory" is through Conversational Implicature
Theory. This approach is part of the pragmatics approach applying to literature.
The application of pragmatics in literary analysis dates back to the 1970s. Although previous
researchers like Morris (1938) had already proposed the connection between pragmatics and
rhetoric, it was not until 1971 that Ohmann first touched the field by defining literature as a type of
discourse. Later in 1976, Van Dijk first used the name "Literary Pragmatics". In Pratt's (1977)
Toward a Speech Acts Theory of Literary Discourse, the author claimed that language in literary
works is also analyzable by linguistics like other forms of language, and this theory was later ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
By saying the hills look like white elephants, the girl tries to draw out another topic. "White
elephant" in English is something expensive but useless or troublesome. At this moment, readers
cannot know her intention, but considering their later conversations, the girl is implicating the baby:
By intentionally take the "elephant" as the animal, the man violates the Maxim of Relation. By
saying words contradictory to each other, he also violates the Maxim of Quality. He stops the girl
from talking about the baby, which receives a reply sounds irony to him. That is why his tone turns
harsh.
The man's provocative attitude forces the girl to change the topic. Before she tries a second time,
they talk about a kind of Spanish alcohol, during which we can see that the girl does not know
Spanish, and it can be further speculated that she relies on the man on this trip. Then their topic
changes to licorice. Readers can say it for sure that the girl is talking with implicature:
The man's answer violates the Maxim of Quality, since it is impossible that everything tastes like
licorice. The girl also violates the Maxim of Quality. She knows the man's words are not true, but
still echoes with him. She emphasizes that all the things people have waited so long for taste like
licorice, especially absinthe, but in fact absinthe tastes bitter with slightly

Clyne's Revision of Grice's Maxims Essay
Grice's Maxims have been criticised for being too Anglo–centric. Michael Clyne proposes revisions
to the four maxims in his 1994 book Intercultural Communication at Work. Do Clyne's revisions of
this model go far enough in universally accounting for intercultural conversation? Why or why not?
Grice's General Cooperative Principle has been under continuous debate for the past three decades.
It is mainly through the maxims that Grice's paradigm has been challenged as highly ethnocentric,
however such readings may tend to take the maxims too literally rather than as "reference points for
language interchange" (Allan as cited in Clyne, 1994, p. 11). There is some agreement in this, but as
suggested by Mey (1994, p. 74), the principle and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In such cases, there is a clash between Grice's maxims and the pragmatic rules of conversation,
which are culturally sensitive. For example, when being offered a drink, a typical Chinese person
would automatically say no the first time, while expecting the offer to be made at least two or three
times more. This resembles a kind of phatic language communication; saying no, but not really
meaning no. In this sort of situation, if someone doesn't adhere to the cultural norm – choosing to
follow Grice's maxims instead, then they would sound odd and out of place. The above example
demonstrates that Grice's maxims aren't relevant in all contexts as they clash with certain cultural
values systems. Many linguists (Clyne, 1994; Hymes, 1986; Loveday, 1983; Walsh, 2009) have
picked up on this discrepancy between theory and data, claiming that the maxims are only relevant
to the English speaking Western world. In particular, Clyne (1994) has pointed out that they have
limited relevance to cultures where content and knowledge are core values. For example, speakers
of Malagasy, "whose form of co–operation seems to consist in making their contributions as opaque,
convoluted and non–perspicuous as possible" (Keenan as cited in Mey, 1994, p. 74) could be seen as
flouting the Maxim of Quantity. This is because information, especially 'new' information gives the
holder a certain amount of prestige, thus Malagasy people tend to

The Importance Of Pragmatic Language Processing
as Goodman & Stuhlmuller (2013) claim that pragmatic language understanding is a social
cognition. Perhaps the complex systems involved in pragmatic language understanding are modules
that specifically process information about social context, and, it is likely that these interpretation.
Perhaps one might start by searching for data suggesting that semantic processing and pragmatic
processing involve different parts of the brain.
In a series of experiments, Rabagliati, Pylkkanen & Marcus (2013) tested linguistic ambiguity
resolution in children compared to adults. They found that children processed language differently
than adults and that children had trouble integrating contextual cues (Rabagliati et al., 2013, p.
1085). And they suggested that this may be because children's executive function abilities are not
fully developed (Rabagliati et al. p. 1085, 2013). This notion is in alignment with previous research
by Khanna and Boland (2010) who studied lexical ambiguity resolution in 7 to 10 year old's and in
adults. They found that those who had more fully developed executive function abilities also were
more sensitive to context in their lexical interpretation (Khanna & Boland, 2010).
These results are starting to paint a picture that the structures for analyzing and interpreting syntax
and semantics may be different than the structures that are involved in a pragmatic interpretation.
One might hypothesize that the modules for strict semantic understanding are in

Studies of Negative Pragmatic Transfer in Interlanguage
2002 �� 4 �O ,�
��
�O �4 �P�� (�� ; �3�� %)
2002 �� c 1 �o
JOURNAL OF GUANGXI NORMAL UNIVERSITY
,�
Studies of negative pragmatic transfer in interlanguage pragmatics
LIU Shao– zh on g , LI AO Feng – r on g
(Foreign Languages College , Guangxi Normal University , Guilin 541004, China )
Abstract : Negative pragmatic transfer (NPT ) is nothing but a difference of saying things between
non2native speakers and native speakers . It occupies an important position in inter 2
,� ,�
language pragmatics whose mission is to scrutinize how non 2native speakers do things with words
with L 2. This paper reported that 4 NPT 2related aspects have been heavily document 2 ed in the
current literature :1 ) L 1 ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Up till now , the following speech acts have been investigated cross 2linguistically : request (Blum 2
Kulka ,1982;1983; House & Kasper ,1987; Faerch & Kasper complaint (DeCapua ,1989 ) , and
apology ( Cohen & Olshtain 1987; House ,1988; Garcia ,1989; Beebe et al ,1990; Bergman al ,1990
) , and correction ( Takahashi & Beebe ,1993 ). Besides ,1989; ,1981; Takahashi & Dufon ,1989 ) ,
Olshtain ,1983; Trosborg , & Kasper ,1993 ) , refusal (Beebe et
, some other non – linguistic factors , such as discourse accent (Scarcella ,1983 ) and politeness
orientation and styles (Takahashi & Beebe , 1993) were also scrutinized . Subjects examined ranged
from the English learners of Hebrew as TL (Blum 2Kulka ,1982;1983;
Olshtain ,1983 ) , the German learners of English (House & Kasper ,1987; House ,1988; DeCapua ,
1989) , the Danish learners of English (House & Kasper ,1987; Trosborg ,1987; Faerch & Kasper ,

1989 ) , the Japanese learners of English as TL ( Takahashi & Dufon ,1989; Beebe et al ,1990 ) , the
Hebrew (Cohen & Olshtain ,1981 ) , the Russian (Olshtain ,1983 ) , the German (House ,1988 ) , the
Spanish ( Scarcella ,1983 ) , the Venezuelan ( Garcia ,1989 ) , and the Japanese (Beebe et al ,1990;
Takahashi & Beebe ,1993 ) , and the Thai learners of ESL (Bergman & Kasper ,1993 ). Cohen &
Olshtain ( 1981 ) , for instance , studied how Hebrew learners of English as L 2 did things with their
interlanguage of

Why Research Is Important Essay
Asking me why research is important is like asking me why breathing is important or why is
walking important. For me, it is a fundamental way of life. Okay, maybe not as fundamental as
oxygen, but it is way up there. Research is important because it can satisfies our thirst in discovery
and make deeper understanding about particular material. A research could give us a confidence
booster when complete it. Research is effected our life. Try to think what research have done so far.
We know lot of things because of research. People do research because they want to know
something new and solve a problem. Research which is the foundation for knowledge that makes
possible so much of the innovation and application that provides wider benefit. In research, ... Show
Language used in communication among the speaker with the hearer. Trough language an idea,
opinion, feeling, critics and some supports can be expressed. Oka (in Suyono, 1990:45) state that to
express the feeling, idea, opinion, critics, and suggestion is a basic means of language. With
language the people can express their idea, opinion and also doing a good communication. When the
people want to share their idea, feeling, opinion or doing some speech they should use language
correctly. In doing a good conversation we should intend the utterance clearly to the hearer and also
the hearer should listen what the speaker saying carefully, it is what the expert call with cooperative
principle in pragmatics field. Pragmatics is a study about the meaning in use or speaker meaning.
One of the most basic assumptions we must make for successful communication to take place in that
both people in a conversation are cooperating, it is conveyed by the philosopher, Paul Grace. Not all
of the people willing to doing cooperative conversation because of some factor, one of them wants
to be polite or even unwillingness in doing a good conversation. Furthermore we often listen the
utterance have a different meaning with the intention of the

What Is Pragmatic Competence?
Pragmatics refers to the social language skills we use in our daily interactions with others. They
include what we say, how we say it, our body language and whether it is appropriate according to
the given situation. Pragmatic skills are vital for communicating our personal thoughts, ideas, and
feelings (Camarata & Gibson, 1999, p.208). All through childhood and adolescence people gain
more insight into the realm of language use: they start to understand different functional use of
language, the difference between the forms and functions, they more readily apply the use of
gestures to enhance understanding, and also start to grasp messages that are implicit and non–literal
(e.g. jokes, sarcasm, metaphors, inferences). Moreover, they learn that different conversational
partners and different conversational contexts require different forms of language. Pragmatic
competence is known by many different names: communicative competence, social language use,
socio–linguistic competence, conversational skills (Belinda Hill and Associates Speech Pathologists,
2008, n.p). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Gradually, the topic has also been picked up by philosophers, sociolinguists, and psychologists who
used it to describe pragmatic competence as a function of culture and age, and in the case of
psychology as a function of a developmental disorder. Skills related to pragmatic competence are:
turn taking skills, nonverbal behaviors, topic–theme management. The use of cohesive ties,
inference, and presuppositions are also connected to pragmatic competence (Spekman & Roth,
1982,

Research Paper On Pragmatics
The researcher in this section will shed light on pragmatics, speech act theory, and Islamic
expressions as stated in previous studies. Interestingly, the researcher will study the effect of using
the modern technology (i.e. Facebook) on pragmatic's functions. 6.1. Pragmatics (Mey, 2001: 6)
construes pragmatics as "the use of language in human communication". Semantic meaning and
pragmatic meaning are two different issues; interpreting the pragmatic meaning of any Islamic
expression is not granted by understanding its pragmatic meaning, then the intended meaning in the
context should be examined. As long as pragmatics is the study of language inside context
(Blakemore 1992, Sperber & Wilson 1995), most linguists concur that context cannot be detached
from pragmatics. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In addition, Leech (1983: X) asserts that "Pragmatics can be usefully defined as the study of how
utterances have meanings in situations." He also adds, "The meaning in pragmatics is defined
relative to a speaker or user of the language, whereas meaning in semantics is defined purely as a
property of expression in a given language, in abstraction from particular situation, speaker or
hearer." (ibid: 5). For Wilson and Carson (2006:404), there is a relation between language and
context in pragmatics which are needed for language

Theories Of Communicative Competence In Language Teaching
1.1 Preliminaries
Communicative language teaching (CLT) which was mainly developed from social science and
humanities beyond language teaching concerns, has been followed for nearly three decades. Hymes
from the linguistic anthropology (1971) and Habermas (1984) from social philosophy point of view,
proposed different notions of communicative competence in CLT to be used in language teaching
and assessment. Communicative competence, as Richards (1985) claimed, includes knowledge of
the grammar, vocabulary of the language, rules of speaking, knowing how to use and respond to
different types of speech acts and knowing how to use language appropriately. It is believed that the
goal of second language teaching should be communicative competence, and it should include the
ability to use language appropriately in social contexts in order to perform communicative functions
and the ability to combine utterances and communicative functions according to the principles of
discourse (Loveday, 1982; Canale & Swain, 1980). ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Hymes in 1960s, to function successfully in society, an individual must be able to use
appropriate language in a given situation and understand the social language hints of others, and also
an individual must have the ability to combine one's own social knowledge with contextual
information to understand the intended meaning of someone's utterance which is known as
pragmatics. Pragmalinguistics that is part of pragmatics, applies to more linguistics features of
pragmatics; in other words, it mostly focuses on the way which linguistic forms of a language are
used to obtain certain pragmatic purposes (Thomas,

Pragmatics And Discourse Analysis
Analyzing There is No Problem at All
Introduction Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis are the two approaches that describe and study a
language. Each of these two approaches has its own studies, features and examples in a language.
Pragmatics studies the meanings in different uses with different situations. And Discourse Analysis
analyzes the language used and how the language reflects, creates and shapes the identity of a
person. This term paper is analyzes a conversation/interview between two characters in an Egyptian
play called "There is no problem at all" which airs in cbc channel. This show always invites famous
starts to interview other famous starts without them knowing. As for this conversation/interview, the
presenter ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
To illustrate more, Hebba Al–Sharbaji says, "You are on air" In minute 03:30. The uncle plays on
words by saying, "Get me down from the air". Moreover, The interviewer declares that even though
the uncle sounds stupid he has another hidden meaning in everything he says. The uncle
mispronounce the word deep with stupid in Arabic since they almost have the same letters, "I'm
stupid, indeed I'm the most stupid person in the world" In minute 09:10; just as in the case of
mispronouncing the word choose with cucumber. Finally, since it is political play, the script relies on
puns because it let the hearer to hear the hidden

Three Essential Concepts In Foundations Of Pragmatics
The second chapter of "Foundations of Pragmatics" describes three essential concepts in pragmatics.
It starts with identifying the pragmatic perspective as a scope concerned with "all aspects of human
(linguistic) communication" (Fetzer 2002); such as the speaker's background knowledge, intentions
and assumptions, etc. This perspective also examines the linguistic and non–linguistic resources
available for a speaker to accomplish a communicative goal in a certain social context.
After that, context is explained as a fundamental concept to account for describing the micro–macro
dialogue in pragmatic studies. According to Cummings (2005), there are two types of context: static
(written texts) and dynamic (verbal exchange). The dynamic notion of context is a vital concept for
micro–macro pragmatics since it allows us to think of the factors that may cause misinterpretation
between interlocutors, and of the level of analysis at which such misinterpretation becomes visible.
The third notion is micropragmatics and macropragmatics. Micropragmatics is defined as the study
of illocutionary force at the utterance level while macropragmatics refers to the study of a sequence
of utterances which form discourses/texts. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This journey starts with the input obtained from the interpretation of the lexical and grammatical
coding of the utterance (immediate) context. Since this input (from deixis, lexical triggers) is
insufficient for the interpretation of the context because it does not include non–textual cues, the
analysis proceeds to the study of inferencing (presuppositions, implicatures). Once the
speaker/hearer interpretation is given, then the speech act level determines the function of the
utterance. After that the speech act comes as the umbrella category for deixis, presupposition,
implicature, and, potentially, a component category or a vital input in the macro

What Is Pragmatic Equivalence
A Translator achieves his goal of conveying meaning from source language to target language using
equivalence . Translators consider translation process more deeper than exchanging lexical and
grammatical terms , when the translator goes far away from nearest linguistic equivalence ,the
problems of determining level of equivalence began to rise . As pragmatics studies why sentences
are used and the context of utterance and surrounding environment of each sentence in the situation .
Pragmatics has to do with intention of speakers , as one should give attention to different types of
beyond meanings that arise from what's literally said , this can go under term of " implicit meaning "
which has relation with pragmatics . Speaker's intentions has to go with elements of structure and
texture . Pragmatic equivalence helps the translator in shifting the effect of words in the target
language and source language . so, pragmatic equivalence could be summed as : when the translator
succeeds in conveying source language to target language with the same intention of text producer
and equivalent words and affection to the reader . ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This research paper will examine the three theories of speech act in their relation with pragmatic
equivalence , it will provide linguists' opinions and theories of speech act . This paper assists the
translator to convey implied meaning of sentence not what it literally says . This translation research
discusses : speech act theory according to Austin and Searle , text act and Gricean maxims

Importance Of Pragmatics
INTRODUCTION OF PRAGMATICS Pragmatics is a subfield of linguistics which are developed
in the late of 1970s. Pragmatics studies how people comprehend and produce a communicative act
or speech act in a conversation. It distinguishes two intents or meanings in each utterance or
communicative act of verbal communication. One is the informative intent or the sentence meaning,
and the other one is the communicative intent or speaker meaning (Leech, 1983; Sperber and
Wilson, 1986). The ability to comprehend and produce a communicative act is referred to as
pragmatic competence (Kasper, 1997) which often includes one's knowledge about the social
distance, social status between the speakers involved, the cultural knowledge such as politeness, and
the linguistic knowledge explicit and implicit. Pragmatics skills which are include conversational
skills, asking, giving and responding to information, turn taking, asking for clarification, adjusting
language based on situation and asking for help or offering help appropriately are the example of the
skills that should be mastered by the language learners. This is because all of these skills are
commanly used in our daily life especially during conversation. We communicate with each other
through conversation whether in verbal or non–verbal. Without ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
There is a lot of reasons why pragmatics should be given attention in learning english. The main
reason is because it bring a lot of advantages to the learners. One of the advantages in learning
pragmatics is that the learners can interpret the meanings of language from a broader intercultural
aspects. By the knowledge that the learner had in their minds about the pragmatics, the learners will
be more sensitive to people intentional meaning embedded in international interaction. They can
also learn to be proficient in reacting to speaker in an effective and comprehensive

Essay On Pragmatics
1.1. Pragmatics
In order to provide the wider information on speech acts and political discourse, the short definition
of pragmatics needs to be presented, as the speech acts are deeply rooted in this particular field of
linguistics. The presented paper provides the explanation of the term based mostly on the Yule's
(1996) definition of it. Pragmatics is field of study which very often is connected with semantics and
syntax. Pragmatics is a study that focuses on the meaning behind the words that are produced by the
speaker and received by the listener, whereas semantics focuses mostly on the words and structures
as such, and syntax focuses on relation between different linguistic forms and its sequences (Yule
1996: 4). The term "pragmatics" was firstly presented as a field of linguistics "in the 1930s by
Morris, Carnap, and Peirce, for whom (...) pragmatics addressed the relation of signs to their users
and interpreters" (Horn and Ward 2006: xi). Yule, in his book Pragmatics (1996), provides a broad ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Thus, a declarative used to make a statement is a direct speech act, but a declarative used to make a
request is an indirect speech act" (Yule 1996: 54–55). For example, sentence "It's cold in the room"
may directly mean that the air in the room is cold, or the speaker that provided the utterance asks the
hearer to close the window. According to Yule, indirect speech acts that are most common to occur
are in the interrogative form. "Could you pass the salt?" (Yule 1996: 56) is one of such a sentence
forms. Moreover, indirect speech are in general connected with politeness. Thus, indirect speech
acts are more common to appear in political discourse, where the political correctness and speaking
about delicate subjects in a polite way is

Grice's Cooperative Principle And Kinds Of Pragmatics...
This chapter explains an overview of related theories, which are the pragmatics theory by George
Yule including the Grice's cooperative principle and kinds of maxim according to Grice.
2.1 Pragmatics
According to Yule (1996), pragmatics is concerned with the study of meaning as communicated by a
speaker (or writer) and interpreted by a listener (or reader). "Pragmatics focuses more on how we
achieve meaning in a particular context, by considering such factors as how, where and when
something is said, who says it, what is the relationship between the speaker and the listener, and
how we understand the use of ambiguous language" (Baker and Ellece, 2011, p.100). In other
words, pragmatics is the study of speaker meaning. Therefore, from the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
67). In other words, flouting the maxim of quality occurs when a speaker says something which
needs to be considered as blatantly untrue. For example: Mark : 'Great, that's really great! That's
made my Christmas!'
Mark is a speaker who says something which is considered as blatantly untrue, because at that time,
he got accident on the day, and he wishes it will be happiness day. He became upset that made him
say something which is blatantly untrue. So, the speaker blatantly fails to observe a maxim in order
to lead the hearer to look for implied meaning or in this situation the hearer already knows that Mark
says the opposite.
2.1.2.3 Flouting Maxim of Relation
Thomas (1996) said that "the maxim of relation is exploited by making a response or observation
which is very obviously irrelevant to the topic in hand" (p.70). So, the speaker flouts the maxim of
relation if his/her contribution is not relevant. For

Beyond A Joke Essay
Humor or joke has always been part of the behavioural collection of "modern Homo sapiens for
thousands of years" (Polimeni, 2006). Joke or humor, being its conventional meaning, is the focus of
some studies conducted from logical, mental, sociological and linguistic perspectives. While other
researchers working within the first three fields may regard humor as a phenomenon, linguists talk
about humour as analysing its semantic and pragmatic devices which leads to various studies
regarding humor. Polimeni (2006) suggested that when we generate and perceive humor or joke, we
undergo biological process which includes a observable cognitive trait that is dependent on both the
person who is generating the joke and the linguistic environment.
The aim of the article "Beyond a Joke" is to help the readers appreciate and be aware about all the
possible meaning a conversational humor may have and familiarise themselves on the topic frequent
in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Skinner supported this claim by stating that students retain more information when humor is
employed, which creates a more positive learning environment, retains student's attention, and
reduces anxiety to students when learning.
Morever, Askildson's (n.d.) study strongly supports the many beneficial effects of humor in
teaching. It was indicated in his study that majority of the participants agreed that humour is an
important element of creating an environment conducive to learning, humour reduces anxiety or
tension among the students inside the classroom. Clearly then, humor is perceived as an important
component for the learning process among both students and teachers and must, therefore, be given
consideration in evaluation of pedagogical approaches to language

Questions On School And Institute
Research ?Literacies ? ?
Assessment ?3 ?
SUBMISSION ?INFORMATION ?SHEET ?
This
?sheet ?should ?be ?attached ?to ?your ?Assessment ?or ?sent ?to ?Jack ?by ?email ?
Name: ? ?SAAD ?ALQARNI ?
Student ?ID: ? ?18403132 ?
WSU ?School/Institute: ?HUMANITIES ?AND ?COMMUNICATION ?ARTS ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(If ?you
?are ?unsure, ?just ?say ?either ?HASS ?or ?STEM) ?
?
FORMAT
?OR ?GENRE ?OF ?ASSESSMENT ?SUBMISSION: ?
JOURNAL ARTICLE ?
?
(e.g.
?essay, ?scientific ?report, ?conference ?transcript, ?or ?whatever ?you ?have ?chosen) ?
? ?
INTENDED ?AUDIENCE ?or ?IMAGINED ?CONTEXT: ?
(if
?required) ?
?
Journal of Pragmatics ?
____________________
?
Fill

?in ?this ?section ?if ?you ?want ?to ?clarify ?the ?audience ?or ?context ?you ?imagine ?for ?this ?
piece ?of ?work. ? ?You ?may ?wish ?to ?do ?this ?if ?the ?audience/context ?are ?important ?for ?
the ? genre ?you ?have ?chosen ?but ?not ?necessarily ?obvious. ? ?
?
For
?example: ?is ?it ?addressed ?to ?a ?non–??academic ?audience ?of ?some ?kind? ? ?What ?
conference ?are ?you ?presenting ?at? ? ?What ?magazine ?is ?this ?published ?in? ? ?Is ?it ?a ?
document ?for ?students? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Teaching Pragmatics
Teaching Pragmatics explores the teaching of pragmatics through lessons and activities created by
teachers of English as a second and foreign language. This book is written for teachers by teachers.
Our teacher–contributors teach in seven different countries and are both native–speakers and
nonnative speakers of English. Activities reflect ESL and EFL classroom settings. The chapters
included here allow teachers to see how other teachers approach the teaching of pragmatics and to
appreciate the diversity and creativity of their endeavors. Taken together, the activities constitute a
spectrum of possibilities for teaching pragmatics. Each submission provides novel insight into the
ESL/EFL classroom and demonstrates that there is no single ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Being outside the range of language use allowed in a language or making a pragmatic mistake may
have various consequences. As the teachers contributing to this volume point out, a pragmatic error
may hinder good communication between speakers (Takenoya), may make the speaker appear
abrupt or brusque in social interactions (Lee), or may make the speaker appear rude or uncaring
(Yates). Gallow points out that maintaining a conversation in English requires underlying
knowledge of responses that prompt a speaker to continue, show understanding, give support,
indicate agreement, show strong emotional response, add or correct a speaker 's information, or ask
for more information. Berry discusses the importance of learning how to take turns and
demonstrates that listening behaviors that are polite in one language may not be polite or
recognizable in another. Unintentional insult to interlocutors (Mach & Ridder) and denial of requests
(Weasenforth) have been identified as other potential pragmatic hazards.
Left to their own devices with respect to contact with the target language in and out of the
classroom, the majority of learners apparently do not acquire the pragmatics of the target language
on their own (Bouton, 1988, 1990, 1992, 1994, Bardovi–Harlig, 2001; Kasper, 2001). What makes
pragmatics "secret" seems to be in some cases insufficient specific input and in others insufficient

Post-Gricean Pragmatics
A few of these lectures were published as papers through the years (1968, 1969, 1975, 1978)
(Turner, 2009 :253). In general, Gricean pragmatics proposes that human verbal communication is a
cooperative activity. Theoretically, the participants follow cooperative and conversational maxims of
quantity, quality, relation and manner. Additionally, He draws a distinction between what is said and
what is implicated. This work, in fact, is the core of his theory of meaning which was first presented
in Grices's 1957 paper Meaning (Cummings, 2010:182). Grice's viewpoint of utterance
interpretation exceeds the code model of communication. Thus, he introduced the inferential model
of communication (see 2.3.4) (Ifantidou, 2001:38). Grice's ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Linguists revealed an overwhelming interest in the relevance– theoretic program which was outlined
with more specific details in two works Relevance Theory: Some Basic Distinctions and Discourse
Applications of Relevance Theory (Rouchota and Jucker, 1998:1). The theory kept evolving.
Recently, it has been updated by Wilson and Sperber in 2004 and Wilson in 2010. At the same time,
Clark's book published in 2013 which is entitled Relevance Theory can be considered as an
introductory textbook to the theory (Huang,

The Definitions Of Pragmatics
Pragmatics is a field of study appeared in the late sixties and early seventies. It is the branch of
linguistics concerned with language use, which deal with the form and meaning of sentences
respectively (Ninio and Snow, 1996, p.9). Hence, pragmatics is usually associated with utterance
and speaker meaning. Some definitions of pragmatics stress different views and perspectives will
help us to understand this field.
Mey (2001), pragmatics is the use of language in human communication as determined by the
conditions of society (p.6). Blum–Kulka and Kasper (1993) are defined that as the study of people's
comprehension and production of linguistic action in context. As for Leech (1983), described
pragmatics as the study of how utterances have ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The continental view would also covers broader cognitive notions as the knowledge of situations,
social institutions and cultures among others would be influenced by language. Culpeper and Haugh
(2014) indicated that some issue such as "politeness" can be addressed in both Anglo–American and
the continental views hence it purposes of describing not only some aspects of linguistic structure
but also some aspects of social function and context. Moreover, many of the topics addressed in
both views extracted of three major pragmatic theories: speech acts (Austin, 1962, Searle, 1969–
1975), conversational implicatures (Grice, 1975), and politeness (Brown & Levinson,

Pragmatics Literature Review
Pragmatics is communication in social interactions for example taking turns, maintaining topic,
appropriate interruptions, eye contact, and maintaining appropriate physical proximity (Prutting &
Kirchner, 1987). Deficits in pragmatic competency are common in individuals with
psychopathology such as autism spectrum disorder, language and/or reading disorders (LD/RD), and
even attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD). Although there have been a large number of
studies looking at the relationship between LD/RD to ADHD (e.g. Tannock & Brown, 2009; Smith
& Adams, 2006) no studies, through my literature review, have directly compared pragmatic skills
through comparing a rehearsal task, story telling, and a questionnaire in a LD/RD group versus
comorbid LD/RD and ADHD group. I will therefore look at participant's pragmatic performance on
three narrative tasks, including a narrative rehearsal, and a parental questionnaire.
The following review of literature will first focus on providing background into the role and
importance of pragmatics. It will then explain how coherence, complexity, and fluency skills are
linked to pragmatic competency. The introduction section will also explain features and general
pragmatic competencies of individuals with only LD/RD and those with comorbid ADHD. An
analysis of how narratives can be used to assess pragmatic competency in those with and without
mental health disorders will be examined. Finally, consideration of some of the

Essay On Pragmatic Track

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Essay On Pragmatic Track

Similar to Essay On Pragmatic Track (13)

More from Amber Wheeler

More from Amber Wheeler (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Pragmatic Track