© 2016 Aras aras.com
MBSE and the Business of Engineering
Pawel Chadzynski
Sr. Director, Product Management
pchadzynski@aras.com
© 2016 Aras aras.com
MBSE and the Business of Engineering
Pawel Chadzynski
Product complexity is increasing
And creating system design challenges
Product
Complexity
Time
2D Mechanical
Electrical
Electronic
Software
Connected
Product as
a Service
3D Mechanical
Systems of
Systems
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Early
Products
Smart
Products
Smart
Connected
Products
Product as
a System
Product vs. Behavior
 Is plane a product with
lots of parts?
 Or is it a system with
behavior working with
lots of other systems
with behavior?
© 2016 Aras aras.com
• Are these cars products
with lots of parts?
• Or is it a system with
behavior working with
lots of other systems
with behaviors?
Product vs. Behavior
 Is plane a product with
lots of parts?
 Or is it a system with
behavior working with
lots of other systems
with behavior?
© 2016 Aras aras.com
• Are these cars products
with lots of parts?
• Or is it a system with
behavior working with
lots of other systems
with behaviors?
Forces new
organizational thinking
CI=103
CI=105
CI=108
Evolution of system complexity
Mechanical
Mechatronic
Mech/Elec/Software/Network
© 2016 Aras aras.com
• Behavior and network connectivity
• Continuous replacement and evolution
• Traceability and re-evaluation
CI = NOC + SLOC
CI – Configuration Items
NOC – Network Operations Center
SLOC – Software Lines Of Code
V-Process supports Systems Engineering
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Sub-system
integration
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
design
Component
test
Component
design
Needs System
Process, manufacture,
assembly
In theory
In reality
V-Process supports Systems Engineering
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Sub-system
integration
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
design
Component
test
Component
design
Needs System
Process, manufacture,
assembly
In theory
Needs System
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
integration
Sub-system
design
Process, manufacture,
assembly
Component
test
Component
design
Domain
handoff gaps
In reality
V-Process supports Systems Engineering
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Sub-system
integration
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
design
Component
test
Component
design
Needs System
Process, manufacture,
assembly
In theory
Needs System
SEM MES
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
integration
Sub-system
design
Process, manufacture,
assembly
Component
test
Component
design
Domain silos:
Mechanical
Electronic
Software
In reality
V-Process supports Systems Engineering
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Sub-system
integration
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
design
Component
test
Component
design
Needs System
Process, manufacture,
assembly
In theory
Behavior appears
after integration!!!Needs System
SEM MES
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
integration
Sub-system
design
Process, manufacture,
assembly
Component
test
Component
design
1. Structure 2. Behavior
3. Requirements 4. Parametrics
From SE to MBSE
© 2016 Aras aras.com
 Specifications
 Interface
requirements
 System design
 Analysis and trade-off
 Test plans
Replacing documents with models,
behaviors, and interfaces
MBSE is not MBD/3D Mockup
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Both eliminate paper documents/drawings but only
MBSE captures system behavior
MBD – Model Based Drawing/DesignMBSE – Model-Based Systems Engineering
1. Structure 2. Behavior
3. Requirements 4. Parametrics
MBSE thrives on cross-discipline
collaboration
© 2016 Aras aras.com
“Model-Based Systems Engineering
(MBSE) is the formalized application
of modeling to support system
requirements, design, analysis,
verification and validation activities
beginning in the conceptual design
phase and continuing throughout
development and later life cycle
phases.” - INCOSE
Mechanical
System
View
V-Process with MBSE
© 2016 Aras aras.com
 Moves creative design
work to the left
 Repeats in each domain
 Repeats cross-domains
 Requires new tools
Verification
Meets requirements
Validation
Meets the purpose
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
integration
Sub-system
design
Process, manufacture,
assembly
SEM MES
Component
test
Component
design
Needs System
Verification
Meets requirements
Validation
Meets the purpose
Behavior part of every
design step
Behavior known
before integration!!!
MBSE relies on multiple tools
© 2016 Aras aras.com
REQ model
SysML model
Simulation
AML/Software
MCAD
ECAD
Timing
Thermal
Stress
etc.
Physical test
Hybrid test
QPP
3D Mockup
ERP/MRP
E-M BOM
Change process
Documentation
etc.
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
integration
Sub-system
design
Process, manufacture,
assembly
SEM MES
Component
test
Component
design
Needs System
Requirements
System
architecting
System
validation
System
integration
Sub-system
integration
Sub-system
design
Process, manufacture,
assembly
SEM MES
Component
test
Component
design
Needs System
MBSE implementation challenges
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Managing MBSE model
versions and revisions
(change)
Linking discipline-specific
Design models to MBSE
models for V&VLinking Simulation
models to MBSE models
for V&V
Linking Test
results to MBSE
models for V&V
Managing model
lifecycles, approval and
change processes, access
Requirements
continually evolving
during design process
It took Thales 10 years from first consideration to
company-wide deployment of MBSE Source: 25th Annual INCOSE
International Symposium, 7/2015
Closing traceability gaps &
preventing them from occurring
© 2016 Aras aras.com
MBSE Digital Twin
Links to a
domain structure
Links to the
Systems Engineering
decomposition
Systems Engineering
decomposition
Domain
structure
ALM
Structure
MBSE Logical to Physical
Create
design
Create
design
Create
design
MCAD
Structure
ECAD
Structure
Reference RL
from SE
Create structures
& link to Logical
Blocks
Create structures
& link to Logical
Blocks
Create structures
& link to Logical
Blocks
SE
Logical
SE
Requirements
Reference
domains
Create SE
structure
Reference RL
from SE
Reference RL
from SE
Create a
model
© 2016 Aras aras.com
SE/MBSE ALM/CAD/MBSE
ALM
Requirements
MCAD
Requirements
ECAD
Requirements
PLM –Product and MBSE
Integrating MBSE models
with PLM product structures
ALM
SE
MCAD
ECAD
MBSE/PLM use cases
The goal is a connected model and product
with full traceability
© 2016 Aras aras.com
MBSE/PLM use cases
The goal is a connected model and product
with full traceability
 Top/Down – System model first, then
detailed Product design
© 2016 Aras aras.com
1
1
MBSE/PLM use cases
The goal is a connected model and product
with full traceability
 Top/Down – System model first, then
detailed Product design
 Reverse modeling – System model from an
existing Product design
© 2016 Aras aras.com
1
2
1
2
MBSE/PLM use cases
The goal is a connected model and product
with full traceability
 Top/Down – System model first, then
detailed Product design
 Reverse modeling – System model from an
existing Product design
 Redesign – System model and Product
design exist, requirements changed
© 2016 Aras aras.com
1
1
2
2
3
3
Benefits of MBSE/PLM integration
 Persistent administration in an extended PLM and/or ALM
System for MBSE artifacts
 Integration of MBSE into the enterprise ECM (Engineering
Change Management) and CM (Configuration Management)
processes
 Managed access control
 Visualization of the MBSE artifacts
 Data exchange in the early phase based on standards
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Business of Engineering
 Product complexity continues to rise
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Business of Engineering
 Product complexity continues to rise
 MBSE provides powerful tools to synthesize the
design of complex systems
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Business of Engineering
 Product complexity continues to rise
 MBSE provides powerful tools to synthesize the
design of complex systems
 MBSE needs to be part of an overall traceability and
configuration management philosophy
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Business of Engineering
 Product complexity continues to rise
 MBSE provides powerful tools to synthesize the
design of complex systems
 MBSE needs to be part of an overall traceability and
configuration management philosophy
 Strong, foundational CM throughout product
lifecycle is a REQUIREMENT to realize MBSE benefits
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Business of Engineering
 Product complexity continues to rise
 MBSE provides powerful tools to synthesize the
design of complex systems
 MBSE needs to be part of an overall traceability and
configuration management philosophy
 Strong, foundational CM throughout product
lifecycle is a REQUIREMENT to realize MBSE benefits
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Aras architecture provides
Future Proof Enterprise PLM
with industry leading CM capability
Partnering with
 TU Kaiserslautern: Proof of
Concept (MagicDraw)
 Airbus/IBM/Aras: OSLC-based
ALM/PLM integration
 XPLM/No Magic: MagicDraw
integration
 Aras/Altium: Bringing ECAD into
MBSE
© 2016 Aras aras.com
Acknowledgements
 Airbus
 IBM
 Dr. Eigner, TU Kaiserslautern
 Dr. Zhang, AVIC
 Altium
 No Magic
 ProSTEP
 INCOSE
 OMG
 OASIS
 XPLM
© 2016 Aras aras.com
© 2016 Aras aras.com

MBSE and the Business of Engineering

  • 1.
    © 2016 Arasaras.com
  • 2.
    MBSE and theBusiness of Engineering Pawel Chadzynski Sr. Director, Product Management pchadzynski@aras.com © 2016 Aras aras.com MBSE and the Business of Engineering Pawel Chadzynski
  • 3.
    Product complexity isincreasing And creating system design challenges Product Complexity Time 2D Mechanical Electrical Electronic Software Connected Product as a Service 3D Mechanical Systems of Systems © 2016 Aras aras.com Early Products Smart Products Smart Connected Products Product as a System
  • 4.
    Product vs. Behavior Is plane a product with lots of parts?  Or is it a system with behavior working with lots of other systems with behavior? © 2016 Aras aras.com • Are these cars products with lots of parts? • Or is it a system with behavior working with lots of other systems with behaviors?
  • 5.
    Product vs. Behavior Is plane a product with lots of parts?  Or is it a system with behavior working with lots of other systems with behavior? © 2016 Aras aras.com • Are these cars products with lots of parts? • Or is it a system with behavior working with lots of other systems with behaviors? Forces new organizational thinking
  • 6.
    CI=103 CI=105 CI=108 Evolution of systemcomplexity Mechanical Mechatronic Mech/Elec/Software/Network © 2016 Aras aras.com • Behavior and network connectivity • Continuous replacement and evolution • Traceability and re-evaluation CI = NOC + SLOC CI – Configuration Items NOC – Network Operations Center SLOC – Software Lines Of Code
  • 7.
    V-Process supports SystemsEngineering © 2016 Aras aras.com Sub-system integration Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system design Component test Component design Needs System Process, manufacture, assembly In theory
  • 8.
    In reality V-Process supportsSystems Engineering © 2016 Aras aras.com Sub-system integration Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system design Component test Component design Needs System Process, manufacture, assembly In theory Needs System Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system integration Sub-system design Process, manufacture, assembly Component test Component design Domain handoff gaps
  • 9.
    In reality V-Process supportsSystems Engineering © 2016 Aras aras.com Sub-system integration Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system design Component test Component design Needs System Process, manufacture, assembly In theory Needs System SEM MES Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system integration Sub-system design Process, manufacture, assembly Component test Component design Domain silos: Mechanical Electronic Software
  • 10.
    In reality V-Process supportsSystems Engineering © 2016 Aras aras.com Sub-system integration Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system design Component test Component design Needs System Process, manufacture, assembly In theory Behavior appears after integration!!!Needs System SEM MES Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system integration Sub-system design Process, manufacture, assembly Component test Component design
  • 11.
    1. Structure 2.Behavior 3. Requirements 4. Parametrics From SE to MBSE © 2016 Aras aras.com  Specifications  Interface requirements  System design  Analysis and trade-off  Test plans Replacing documents with models, behaviors, and interfaces
  • 12.
    MBSE is notMBD/3D Mockup © 2016 Aras aras.com Both eliminate paper documents/drawings but only MBSE captures system behavior MBD – Model Based Drawing/DesignMBSE – Model-Based Systems Engineering 1. Structure 2. Behavior 3. Requirements 4. Parametrics
  • 13.
    MBSE thrives oncross-discipline collaboration © 2016 Aras aras.com “Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) is the formalized application of modeling to support system requirements, design, analysis, verification and validation activities beginning in the conceptual design phase and continuing throughout development and later life cycle phases.” - INCOSE Mechanical System View
  • 14.
    V-Process with MBSE ©2016 Aras aras.com  Moves creative design work to the left  Repeats in each domain  Repeats cross-domains  Requires new tools Verification Meets requirements Validation Meets the purpose Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system integration Sub-system design Process, manufacture, assembly SEM MES Component test Component design Needs System Verification Meets requirements Validation Meets the purpose Behavior part of every design step Behavior known before integration!!!
  • 15.
    MBSE relies onmultiple tools © 2016 Aras aras.com REQ model SysML model Simulation AML/Software MCAD ECAD Timing Thermal Stress etc. Physical test Hybrid test QPP 3D Mockup ERP/MRP E-M BOM Change process Documentation etc. Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system integration Sub-system design Process, manufacture, assembly SEM MES Component test Component design Needs System
  • 16.
    Requirements System architecting System validation System integration Sub-system integration Sub-system design Process, manufacture, assembly SEM MES Component test Component design NeedsSystem MBSE implementation challenges © 2016 Aras aras.com Managing MBSE model versions and revisions (change) Linking discipline-specific Design models to MBSE models for V&VLinking Simulation models to MBSE models for V&V Linking Test results to MBSE models for V&V Managing model lifecycles, approval and change processes, access Requirements continually evolving during design process It took Thales 10 years from first consideration to company-wide deployment of MBSE Source: 25th Annual INCOSE International Symposium, 7/2015
  • 17.
    Closing traceability gaps& preventing them from occurring © 2016 Aras aras.com MBSE Digital Twin Links to a domain structure Links to the Systems Engineering decomposition Systems Engineering decomposition Domain structure
  • 18.
    ALM Structure MBSE Logical toPhysical Create design Create design Create design MCAD Structure ECAD Structure Reference RL from SE Create structures & link to Logical Blocks Create structures & link to Logical Blocks Create structures & link to Logical Blocks SE Logical SE Requirements Reference domains Create SE structure Reference RL from SE Reference RL from SE Create a model © 2016 Aras aras.com SE/MBSE ALM/CAD/MBSE ALM Requirements MCAD Requirements ECAD Requirements PLM –Product and MBSE Integrating MBSE models with PLM product structures ALM SE MCAD ECAD
  • 19.
    MBSE/PLM use cases Thegoal is a connected model and product with full traceability © 2016 Aras aras.com
  • 20.
    MBSE/PLM use cases Thegoal is a connected model and product with full traceability  Top/Down – System model first, then detailed Product design © 2016 Aras aras.com 1 1
  • 21.
    MBSE/PLM use cases Thegoal is a connected model and product with full traceability  Top/Down – System model first, then detailed Product design  Reverse modeling – System model from an existing Product design © 2016 Aras aras.com 1 2 1 2
  • 22.
    MBSE/PLM use cases Thegoal is a connected model and product with full traceability  Top/Down – System model first, then detailed Product design  Reverse modeling – System model from an existing Product design  Redesign – System model and Product design exist, requirements changed © 2016 Aras aras.com 1 1 2 2 3 3
  • 23.
    Benefits of MBSE/PLMintegration  Persistent administration in an extended PLM and/or ALM System for MBSE artifacts  Integration of MBSE into the enterprise ECM (Engineering Change Management) and CM (Configuration Management) processes  Managed access control  Visualization of the MBSE artifacts  Data exchange in the early phase based on standards © 2016 Aras aras.com
  • 24.
    Business of Engineering Product complexity continues to rise © 2016 Aras aras.com
  • 25.
    Business of Engineering Product complexity continues to rise  MBSE provides powerful tools to synthesize the design of complex systems © 2016 Aras aras.com
  • 26.
    Business of Engineering Product complexity continues to rise  MBSE provides powerful tools to synthesize the design of complex systems  MBSE needs to be part of an overall traceability and configuration management philosophy © 2016 Aras aras.com
  • 27.
    Business of Engineering Product complexity continues to rise  MBSE provides powerful tools to synthesize the design of complex systems  MBSE needs to be part of an overall traceability and configuration management philosophy  Strong, foundational CM throughout product lifecycle is a REQUIREMENT to realize MBSE benefits © 2016 Aras aras.com
  • 28.
    Business of Engineering Product complexity continues to rise  MBSE provides powerful tools to synthesize the design of complex systems  MBSE needs to be part of an overall traceability and configuration management philosophy  Strong, foundational CM throughout product lifecycle is a REQUIREMENT to realize MBSE benefits © 2016 Aras aras.com Aras architecture provides Future Proof Enterprise PLM with industry leading CM capability
  • 29.
    Partnering with  TUKaiserslautern: Proof of Concept (MagicDraw)  Airbus/IBM/Aras: OSLC-based ALM/PLM integration  XPLM/No Magic: MagicDraw integration  Aras/Altium: Bringing ECAD into MBSE © 2016 Aras aras.com
  • 30.
    Acknowledgements  Airbus  IBM Dr. Eigner, TU Kaiserslautern  Dr. Zhang, AVIC  Altium  No Magic  ProSTEP  INCOSE  OMG  OASIS  XPLM © 2016 Aras aras.com
  • 31.
    © 2016 Arasaras.com