SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 36
How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? A Chapman Alliance, Research Study September 2010 By Bryan Chapman, Chief Learning Strategist bryan@chapmanalliance.com www.chapmanalliance.com Abstract:Several years ago, I published some learning development metrics from several different studies that included ratios for how long it takes to create different types of learning. The information has been widely used and appears frequently throughout the Blogosphere. Recently, we have been receiving many requests to update this data, so Chapman Alliance created a survey to collect usable metrics that will help you benchmark your own learning development times. This time, all of the results were collected from a single audience (249 completed surveys) across several learning formats including instructor –led training (ILT), Level 1 e-Learning (Basic), Level 2 e-learning (Interactive), Level 3 e-learning (Advanced), and information about blended learning. The results are contained in this deck. Now, the good news… You are welcome to share this research with anyone you’d like. Because we feel that this information is so important to the industry, we have released it under Creative Commons, meaning that you can share the whole deck or pull-out slides/charts and add them to your presentations, white papers, conference presentations, etc.  The only restrictions are (1) you must ALWAYS list the source of information as “Chapman Alliance” and (2) you are NOT allowed to sell the results without written permission from Chapman Alliance. That’s it. Enjoy! Source Citation:  Chapman, B. (2010). How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? [Research Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC. www.chapmanalliance.com
Survey DemographicsThanks to all of you who took time to complete the survey!If you would like to participate in future research surveys from Chapman Alliance, please join our list at www.chapmanalliance.com/join-our-mailing-list
The data contained in this research was collected from 249 organizations, representing 3,947 learning development professionals, who have created learning content  (ILT and eLearning) that is consumed by 19,875,946 Learners.
Instructor-Led Training (ILT)Development Benchmark
Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Overall Times and Ranges Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Overall Times and Ranges 82:1 43:1 22:1
Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of  hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 43 hours Based on average of 43 development hours, per finished hour of ILT NOTE: Times reflect time spent by all members of the development team including: instructional designers, writers, subject matter experts (SME), graphic artists, project managers, etc.
Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create instructor-led training (internally)? $5,934 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of ILT. The cost shown is the average
Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: *    Average time of development per finished hour of ILT: 43 **  Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of ILT content: $5,934 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
Level 1 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
Development of Level 1 - eLearning How is Level 1 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT:  It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results,  especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
Development of Level 1 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 125:1 79:1 49:1
Development of Level 1 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 79 hours Based on average of 79 development hours, per finished hour of Level 1 eLearning NOTE: Times reflect time spent by all members of the development team including: instructional designers, writers, subject matter experts (SME), graphic artists, authors, media producers, project managers, etc.
Development of Level 1 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 1 eLearning? $10,054 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
Development of Level 1 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: *    Average time of development per finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: 79 **  Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: $10,054 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
Level 2 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
Development of Level 2 - eLearning How is Level 2 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT:  It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results,  especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
Development of Level 2 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 267:1 184:1 127:1
Development of Level 2 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 184 hours Based on average of 184 development hours, per finished hour of Level 2 eLearning NOTE: Times reflect time spent by all members of the development team including: instructional designers, writers, subject matter experts (SME), graphic artists, authors, media producers, project managers, etc.
$18,583 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
Development of Level 2 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: *    Average time of development per finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: 184 **  Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: $18,583 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
Level 3 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
Development of Level 3 - eLearning How is Level 3 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT:  It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results,  especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
Development of Level 3 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges NOTE: Several respondents listed times greater than 2000+ hours of development per finished hour (very advanced learning simulations and games) 716:1 490:1 217:1
Development of Level 3 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 490 hours Based on average of 490 development hours, per finished hour of Level 3 eLearning NOTE: Times reflect time spent by all members of the development team including: instructional designers, writers, subject matter experts (SME), graphic artists, authors, media producers, project managers, etc.
Development of Level 3 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 3 eLearning? $50,371 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
Development of Level 3 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: *    Average time of development per finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: 490 **  Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: $50,371 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
Comparison ChartsDevelopment Ratios and Costs
Development Ratios - Summary ILT, Level 1 eLearning (Basic), Level 2 eLearning (Interactive), Level 3 eLearning (Advanced)
Average Cost Comparisons - Summary ILT, Level 1 eLearning (Basic), Level 2 eLearning (Interactive), Level 3 eLearning (Advanced)
Blended LearningBenchmark of Blended Learning Components
Blended Learning Components Radar chart showing components most frequently used as part of a blended learning course (across all respondents)
Blended Learning Components Components used most frequently as part of a blend
Blended Learning Components Average mix of major components: Classroom, Virtual Classroom and E-Learning (survey respondents)
Blended Learning What is the average size of a Blended Learning Course?  …and what are organizations typically paying for internal development of blended learning (on average)? NOTE: These were asked as three separate questions.  Components used in blend Typical length of blend Average cost of blend We realize that this data doesn’t mesh well with previous questions about development per finished hour ratios.  If you average out the costs, it would seem to suggest that blended learning is created at a rate of $809 per finished hour ($25,900 divided by 32).  We thought it would be helpful to share the data anyway.  Please understand these constraints when interpreting the data $25,900 Average Duration  32 hours Average Configuration
About the Author Bryan Chapman is Chief Learning Strategist at Chapman Alliance; a provider of research-centric consulting solutions that assist organizations in defining, operating and optimizing their strategic learning initiatives. As a veteran in the industry, he has over 20 years experience and has worked with such organizations as American Express, Shell, Kodak, Sprint, Sharp Electronics, Honda, IBM, Microsoft, Avon, UNICEF, American Red Cross, The Food and Drug Administration, U.S. State Department, and many others; to help them optimize learning efficiency through the use of innovative learning techniques and technologies. Click here for a full bio. Please feel free to contact me if you need some assistance… ,[object Object]
finding and applying learning industry research; custom research projects

More Related Content

What's hot

Planning for instructional implementation
Planning for instructional implementationPlanning for instructional implementation
Planning for instructional implementationleesha roberts
 
Agile Delivery PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Agile Delivery PowerPoint Presentation SlidesAgile Delivery PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Agile Delivery PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
 
öğRetim yöntemleri ve teknikleri
öğRetim yöntemleri ve teknikleriöğRetim yöntemleri ve teknikleri
öğRetim yöntemleri ve tekniklerimassive501
 
تدشين مشروع تواصل للصم 1 1-2015
تدشين مشروع تواصل للصم 1 1-2015تدشين مشروع تواصل للصم 1 1-2015
تدشين مشروع تواصل للصم 1 1-2015Adel Khalifa, PhD
 
ISD / ADDIE Design Document Template
ISD / ADDIE Design Document TemplateISD / ADDIE Design Document Template
ISD / ADDIE Design Document TemplateDarren Nerland
 
Five Key Numbers to Gauge your Agile Engineering Efforts
Five Key Numbers to Gauge your Agile Engineering EffortsFive Key Numbers to Gauge your Agile Engineering Efforts
Five Key Numbers to Gauge your Agile Engineering EffortsJeff Nielsen
 
Make Training Count: An Intro to the ADDIE Model
Make Training Count:  An Intro to the ADDIE ModelMake Training Count:  An Intro to the ADDIE Model
Make Training Count: An Intro to the ADDIE ModelHeidi Nagel
 
الفيديو التعليمي
الفيديو التعليميالفيديو التعليمي
الفيديو التعليميla_fontaine25
 
Training design document - Template 1
Training design document - Template 1Training design document - Template 1
Training design document - Template 1Iida Hokkanen
 
Comparing Instructional Design Models
Comparing Instructional Design ModelsComparing Instructional Design Models
Comparing Instructional Design ModelsMichael M Grant
 
CHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION TO LEARNING PROCESS
CHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION TO LEARNING PROCESSCHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION TO LEARNING PROCESS
CHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION TO LEARNING PROCESSTeam Web Africa
 
Maatschappelijke Business Case
Maatschappelijke Business CaseMaatschappelijke Business Case
Maatschappelijke Business CaseCorin Potters-Kemp
 
New Lean-Agile Coach self-assessment radars v3.2
New Lean-Agile Coach self-assessment radars v3.2New Lean-Agile Coach self-assessment radars v3.2
New Lean-Agile Coach self-assessment radars v3.2Luca Minudel
 
Panorama des-methodologies-cours-fle
Panorama des-methodologies-cours-flePanorama des-methodologies-cours-fle
Panorama des-methodologies-cours-fleGO Nom de famille
 
الوسائط الفائقة
الوسائط الفائقةالوسائط الفائقة
الوسائط الفائقةAhmed EL-Mabaredy
 

What's hot (20)

Pillars of Scrum Slides for Andy
Pillars of Scrum Slides for AndyPillars of Scrum Slides for Andy
Pillars of Scrum Slides for Andy
 
Planning for instructional implementation
Planning for instructional implementationPlanning for instructional implementation
Planning for instructional implementation
 
Pp02
Pp02Pp02
Pp02
 
Agile Delivery PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Agile Delivery PowerPoint Presentation SlidesAgile Delivery PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Agile Delivery PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
öğRetim yöntemleri ve teknikleri
öğRetim yöntemleri ve teknikleriöğRetim yöntemleri ve teknikleri
öğRetim yöntemleri ve teknikleri
 
تدشين مشروع تواصل للصم 1 1-2015
تدشين مشروع تواصل للصم 1 1-2015تدشين مشروع تواصل للصم 1 1-2015
تدشين مشروع تواصل للصم 1 1-2015
 
ISD / ADDIE Design Document Template
ISD / ADDIE Design Document TemplateISD / ADDIE Design Document Template
ISD / ADDIE Design Document Template
 
Five Key Numbers to Gauge your Agile Engineering Efforts
Five Key Numbers to Gauge your Agile Engineering EffortsFive Key Numbers to Gauge your Agile Engineering Efforts
Five Key Numbers to Gauge your Agile Engineering Efforts
 
Make Training Count: An Intro to the ADDIE Model
Make Training Count:  An Intro to the ADDIE ModelMake Training Count:  An Intro to the ADDIE Model
Make Training Count: An Intro to the ADDIE Model
 
الفيديو التعليمي
الفيديو التعليميالفيديو التعليمي
الفيديو التعليمي
 
Training design document - Template 1
Training design document - Template 1Training design document - Template 1
Training design document - Template 1
 
Comparing Instructional Design Models
Comparing Instructional Design ModelsComparing Instructional Design Models
Comparing Instructional Design Models
 
CHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION TO LEARNING PROCESS
CHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION TO LEARNING PROCESSCHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION TO LEARNING PROCESS
CHAPTER 3 INTRODUCTION TO LEARNING PROCESS
 
Maatschappelijke Business Case
Maatschappelijke Business CaseMaatschappelijke Business Case
Maatschappelijke Business Case
 
The hothouse approach
The hothouse approachThe hothouse approach
The hothouse approach
 
Knowledge Transfer at the Workplace
Knowledge Transfer at the WorkplaceKnowledge Transfer at the Workplace
Knowledge Transfer at the Workplace
 
Addie
AddieAddie
Addie
 
New Lean-Agile Coach self-assessment radars v3.2
New Lean-Agile Coach self-assessment radars v3.2New Lean-Agile Coach self-assessment radars v3.2
New Lean-Agile Coach self-assessment radars v3.2
 
Panorama des-methodologies-cours-fle
Panorama des-methodologies-cours-flePanorama des-methodologies-cours-fle
Panorama des-methodologies-cours-fle
 
الوسائط الفائقة
الوسائط الفائقةالوسائط الفائقة
الوسائط الفائقة
 

Viewers also liked

MBA760 Chapter 01
MBA760 Chapter 01MBA760 Chapter 01
MBA760 Chapter 01iDocs
 
Evaluacion De Un Proyecto E Learning Ppt
Evaluacion De Un Proyecto E Learning PptEvaluacion De Un Proyecto E Learning Ppt
Evaluacion De Un Proyecto E Learning PptSusana Trabaldo
 
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A Primer
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A PrimerBasic Instructional Design Principles - A Primer
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A PrimerMike Kunkle
 
A Case Study of Micro-Blogging for Learning at Qualcomm
A Case Study of Micro-Blogging for Learning at QualcommA Case Study of Micro-Blogging for Learning at Qualcomm
A Case Study of Micro-Blogging for Learning at QualcommB.J. Schone
 
MBA760 Chapter 07
MBA760 Chapter 07MBA760 Chapter 07
MBA760 Chapter 07iDocs
 
Theories of Learning
Theories of LearningTheories of Learning
Theories of Learningiambenvaughan
 
Impact of technology on education
Impact of technology on educationImpact of technology on education
Impact of technology on educationMax Inder
 
Assessment Of Student Learning
Assessment Of Student LearningAssessment Of Student Learning
Assessment Of Student LearningArlan Villanueva
 
Project planning and feasibility study
Project planning and feasibility studyProject planning and feasibility study
Project planning and feasibility studyMars Mfyam
 

Viewers also liked (13)

Jornada IOC. E-learning 2.0
Jornada IOC. E-learning 2.0Jornada IOC. E-learning 2.0
Jornada IOC. E-learning 2.0
 
MBA760 Chapter 01
MBA760 Chapter 01MBA760 Chapter 01
MBA760 Chapter 01
 
Evaluacion De Un Proyecto E Learning Ppt
Evaluacion De Un Proyecto E Learning PptEvaluacion De Un Proyecto E Learning Ppt
Evaluacion De Un Proyecto E Learning Ppt
 
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A Primer
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A PrimerBasic Instructional Design Principles - A Primer
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A Primer
 
A Case Study of Micro-Blogging for Learning at Qualcomm
A Case Study of Micro-Blogging for Learning at QualcommA Case Study of Micro-Blogging for Learning at Qualcomm
A Case Study of Micro-Blogging for Learning at Qualcomm
 
MBA760 Chapter 07
MBA760 Chapter 07MBA760 Chapter 07
MBA760 Chapter 07
 
Theories of Learning
Theories of LearningTheories of Learning
Theories of Learning
 
Feasibility Study
Feasibility StudyFeasibility Study
Feasibility Study
 
Impact of technology on education
Impact of technology on educationImpact of technology on education
Impact of technology on education
 
Assessment Of Student Learning
Assessment Of Student LearningAssessment Of Student Learning
Assessment Of Student Learning
 
Feasibility Study (Veggie Bread)
Feasibility Study (Veggie Bread)Feasibility Study (Veggie Bread)
Feasibility Study (Veggie Bread)
 
Project planning and feasibility study
Project planning and feasibility studyProject planning and feasibility study
Project planning and feasibility study
 
Theories of Learning
Theories of LearningTheories of Learning
Theories of Learning
 

Similar to How Long Does it Take to Create Learning

Cuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formación
Cuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formaciónCuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formación
Cuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formaciónEpise
 
Learning Development Times - Benchmark
Learning Development Times - BenchmarkLearning Development Times - Benchmark
Learning Development Times - BenchmarkChapman Alliance
 
howlong-100914094357-phpapp02.pdf
howlong-100914094357-phpapp02.pdfhowlong-100914094357-phpapp02.pdf
howlong-100914094357-phpapp02.pdfSoniaRuel1
 
Hoeveel kost het maken van e-learning?
Hoeveel kost het maken van e-learning?Hoeveel kost het maken van e-learning?
Hoeveel kost het maken van e-learning?aeinhaus
 
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013Chapman Alliance
 
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearningSingle-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearningXyleme
 
Internship Project Proposal
Internship Project ProposalInternship Project Proposal
Internship Project ProposalS. Rose
 
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docxFormative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docxhanneloremccaffery
 
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!Human Capital Media
 
Cody technology use_plan_presentation
Cody technology use_plan_presentationCody technology use_plan_presentation
Cody technology use_plan_presentationlibbyjcody
 
Instructional Design
Instructional DesignInstructional Design
Instructional DesignRiva Warid
 
Eld presentation (final)
Eld presentation (final)Eld presentation (final)
Eld presentation (final)Ed Nagelhout
 
Design & development hours
Design & development hoursDesign & development hours
Design & development hoursSouhair Katbeh
 
ClipFlair Revoicing and Captioning Activities
ClipFlair Revoicing and Captioning ActivitiesClipFlair Revoicing and Captioning Activities
ClipFlair Revoicing and Captioning ActivitiesClipFlair
 
Technology Action Plan
Technology Action PlanTechnology Action Plan
Technology Action Planclynvan1
 
Meeting and workshop project based learning february 4th 2014 by mr.samir bounab
Meeting and workshop project based learning february 4th 2014 by mr.samir bounabMeeting and workshop project based learning february 4th 2014 by mr.samir bounab
Meeting and workshop project based learning february 4th 2014 by mr.samir bounabMr Bounab Samir
 
Staffing the erp training team
Staffing the erp training teamStaffing the erp training team
Staffing the erp training teamSouhair Katbeh
 

Similar to How Long Does it Take to Create Learning (20)

Cuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formación
Cuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formaciónCuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formación
Cuánto cuesta diseñar una hora de formación
 
Learning Development Times - Benchmark
Learning Development Times - BenchmarkLearning Development Times - Benchmark
Learning Development Times - Benchmark
 
howlong-100914094357-phpapp02.pdf
howlong-100914094357-phpapp02.pdfhowlong-100914094357-phpapp02.pdf
howlong-100914094357-phpapp02.pdf
 
Cost to develop eLearning
Cost to develop eLearningCost to develop eLearning
Cost to develop eLearning
 
Hoeveel kost het maken van e-learning?
Hoeveel kost het maken van e-learning?Hoeveel kost het maken van e-learning?
Hoeveel kost het maken van e-learning?
 
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
Developing Large Scale Blended Learning: Research 2013
 
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearningSingle-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
Single-Source XML: The Secret Behind Mobile and eLearning
 
Internship Project Proposal
Internship Project ProposalInternship Project Proposal
Internship Project Proposal
 
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docxFormative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
Formative EvaluationFormative evaluation gives real results as t.docx
 
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
Modernize for Engagement: The 5 Steps to Breathing Life Back into Stale Content!
 
Cody technology use_plan_presentation
Cody technology use_plan_presentationCody technology use_plan_presentation
Cody technology use_plan_presentation
 
Project method
Project methodProject method
Project method
 
Instructional Design
Instructional DesignInstructional Design
Instructional Design
 
Eld presentation (final)
Eld presentation (final)Eld presentation (final)
Eld presentation (final)
 
Design & development hours
Design & development hoursDesign & development hours
Design & development hours
 
ClipFlair Revoicing and Captioning Activities
ClipFlair Revoicing and Captioning ActivitiesClipFlair Revoicing and Captioning Activities
ClipFlair Revoicing and Captioning Activities
 
Technology Action Plan
Technology Action PlanTechnology Action Plan
Technology Action Plan
 
Meeting and workshop project based learning february 4th 2014 by mr.samir bounab
Meeting and workshop project based learning february 4th 2014 by mr.samir bounabMeeting and workshop project based learning february 4th 2014 by mr.samir bounab
Meeting and workshop project based learning february 4th 2014 by mr.samir bounab
 
Staffing the erp training team
Staffing the erp training teamStaffing the erp training team
Staffing the erp training team
 
Navigating The World of E-Learning
Navigating The World of E-LearningNavigating The World of E-Learning
Navigating The World of E-Learning
 

Recently uploaded

Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptx
Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptxMonthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptx
Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptxAndy Lambert
 
Creating Low-Code Loan Applications using the Trisotech Mortgage Feature Set
Creating Low-Code Loan Applications using the Trisotech Mortgage Feature SetCreating Low-Code Loan Applications using the Trisotech Mortgage Feature Set
Creating Low-Code Loan Applications using the Trisotech Mortgage Feature SetDenis Gagné
 
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan CommunicationsPharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communicationskarancommunications
 
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMMonte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMRavindra Nath Shukla
 
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf(CBTL), Business strategy case study
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf(CBTL), Business strategy case studyThe Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf(CBTL), Business strategy case study
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf(CBTL), Business strategy case studyEthan lee
 
Regression analysis: Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
Regression analysis:  Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear RegressionRegression analysis:  Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
Regression analysis: Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear RegressionRavindra Nath Shukla
 
Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...
Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...
Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...Roland Driesen
 
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation SlidesKeppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation SlidesKeppelCorporation
 
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableDipal Arora
 
Mysore Call Girls 8617370543 WhatsApp Number 24x7 Best Services
Mysore Call Girls 8617370543 WhatsApp Number 24x7 Best ServicesMysore Call Girls 8617370543 WhatsApp Number 24x7 Best Services
Mysore Call Girls 8617370543 WhatsApp Number 24x7 Best ServicesDipal Arora
 
GD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in managementGD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in managementchhavia330
 
Progress Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
Progress  Report - Oracle Database Analyst SummitProgress  Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
Progress Report - Oracle Database Analyst SummitHolger Mueller
 
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...anilsa9823
 
Socio-economic-Impact-of-business-consumers-suppliers-and.pptx
Socio-economic-Impact-of-business-consumers-suppliers-and.pptxSocio-economic-Impact-of-business-consumers-suppliers-and.pptx
Socio-economic-Impact-of-business-consumers-suppliers-and.pptxtrishalcan8
 
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdfGrateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdfPaul Menig
 
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.Eni
 
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for SuccessSales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for SuccessAggregage
 
DEPED Work From Home WORKWEEK-PLAN.docx
DEPED Work From Home  WORKWEEK-PLAN.docxDEPED Work From Home  WORKWEEK-PLAN.docx
DEPED Work From Home WORKWEEK-PLAN.docxRodelinaLaud
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptx
Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptxMonthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptx
Monthly Social Media Update April 2024 pptx.pptx
 
Creating Low-Code Loan Applications using the Trisotech Mortgage Feature Set
Creating Low-Code Loan Applications using the Trisotech Mortgage Feature SetCreating Low-Code Loan Applications using the Trisotech Mortgage Feature Set
Creating Low-Code Loan Applications using the Trisotech Mortgage Feature Set
 
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan CommunicationsPharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
 
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSMMonte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
Monte Carlo simulation : Simulation using MCSM
 
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf(CBTL), Business strategy case study
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf(CBTL), Business strategy case studyThe Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf(CBTL), Business strategy case study
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf(CBTL), Business strategy case study
 
Regression analysis: Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
Regression analysis:  Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear RegressionRegression analysis:  Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
Regression analysis: Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression
 
Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...
Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...
Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...
 
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation SlidesKeppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update  Presentation Slides
Keppel Ltd. 1Q 2024 Business Update Presentation Slides
 
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Pune Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Best Practices for Implementing an External Recruiting Partnership
Best Practices for Implementing an External Recruiting PartnershipBest Practices for Implementing an External Recruiting Partnership
Best Practices for Implementing an External Recruiting Partnership
 
Mysore Call Girls 8617370543 WhatsApp Number 24x7 Best Services
Mysore Call Girls 8617370543 WhatsApp Number 24x7 Best ServicesMysore Call Girls 8617370543 WhatsApp Number 24x7 Best Services
Mysore Call Girls 8617370543 WhatsApp Number 24x7 Best Services
 
GD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in managementGD Birla and his contribution in management
GD Birla and his contribution in management
 
Progress Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
Progress  Report - Oracle Database Analyst SummitProgress  Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
Progress Report - Oracle Database Analyst Summit
 
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
Lucknow 💋 Escorts in Lucknow - 450+ Call Girl Cash Payment 8923113531 Neha Th...
 
Socio-economic-Impact-of-business-consumers-suppliers-and.pptx
Socio-economic-Impact-of-business-consumers-suppliers-and.pptxSocio-economic-Impact-of-business-consumers-suppliers-and.pptx
Socio-economic-Impact-of-business-consumers-suppliers-and.pptx
 
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdfGrateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
Grateful 7 speech thanking everyone that has helped.pdf
 
Forklift Operations: Safety through Cartoons
Forklift Operations: Safety through CartoonsForklift Operations: Safety through Cartoons
Forklift Operations: Safety through Cartoons
 
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
Eni 2024 1Q Results - 24.04.24 business.
 
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for SuccessSales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
Sales & Marketing Alignment: How to Synergize for Success
 
DEPED Work From Home WORKWEEK-PLAN.docx
DEPED Work From Home  WORKWEEK-PLAN.docxDEPED Work From Home  WORKWEEK-PLAN.docx
DEPED Work From Home WORKWEEK-PLAN.docx
 

How Long Does it Take to Create Learning

  • 1. How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? A Chapman Alliance, Research Study September 2010 By Bryan Chapman, Chief Learning Strategist bryan@chapmanalliance.com www.chapmanalliance.com Abstract:Several years ago, I published some learning development metrics from several different studies that included ratios for how long it takes to create different types of learning. The information has been widely used and appears frequently throughout the Blogosphere. Recently, we have been receiving many requests to update this data, so Chapman Alliance created a survey to collect usable metrics that will help you benchmark your own learning development times. This time, all of the results were collected from a single audience (249 completed surveys) across several learning formats including instructor –led training (ILT), Level 1 e-Learning (Basic), Level 2 e-learning (Interactive), Level 3 e-learning (Advanced), and information about blended learning. The results are contained in this deck. Now, the good news… You are welcome to share this research with anyone you’d like. Because we feel that this information is so important to the industry, we have released it under Creative Commons, meaning that you can share the whole deck or pull-out slides/charts and add them to your presentations, white papers, conference presentations, etc. The only restrictions are (1) you must ALWAYS list the source of information as “Chapman Alliance” and (2) you are NOT allowed to sell the results without written permission from Chapman Alliance. That’s it. Enjoy! Source Citation: Chapman, B. (2010). How Long Does it Take to Create Learning? [Research Study]. Published by Chapman Alliance LLC. www.chapmanalliance.com
  • 2. Survey DemographicsThanks to all of you who took time to complete the survey!If you would like to participate in future research surveys from Chapman Alliance, please join our list at www.chapmanalliance.com/join-our-mailing-list
  • 3. The data contained in this research was collected from 249 organizations, representing 3,947 learning development professionals, who have created learning content (ILT and eLearning) that is consumed by 19,875,946 Learners.
  • 5. Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Overall Times and Ranges Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Overall Times and Ranges 82:1 43:1 22:1
  • 6. Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 43 hours Based on average of 43 development hours, per finished hour of ILT NOTE: Times reflect time spent by all members of the development team including: instructional designers, writers, subject matter experts (SME), graphic artists, project managers, etc.
  • 7. Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create instructor-led training (internally)? $5,934 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of ILT. The cost shown is the average
  • 8. Development of Instructor-Led Training (ILT) Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of ILT: 43 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of ILT content: $5,934 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
  • 9. Level 1 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
  • 10. Development of Level 1 - eLearning How is Level 1 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT: It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results, especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
  • 11. Development of Level 1 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 125:1 79:1 49:1
  • 12. Development of Level 1 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 79 hours Based on average of 79 development hours, per finished hour of Level 1 eLearning NOTE: Times reflect time spent by all members of the development team including: instructional designers, writers, subject matter experts (SME), graphic artists, authors, media producers, project managers, etc.
  • 13. Development of Level 1 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 1 eLearning? $10,054 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
  • 14. Development of Level 1 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: 79 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 1 eLearning: $10,054 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
  • 15. Level 2 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
  • 16. Development of Level 2 - eLearning How is Level 2 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT: It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results, especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
  • 17. Development of Level 2 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges 267:1 184:1 127:1
  • 18. Development of Level 2 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 184 hours Based on average of 184 development hours, per finished hour of Level 2 eLearning NOTE: Times reflect time spent by all members of the development team including: instructional designers, writers, subject matter experts (SME), graphic artists, authors, media producers, project managers, etc.
  • 19. $18,583 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
  • 20. Development of Level 2 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: 184 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 2 eLearning: $18,583 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
  • 21. Level 3 - eLearningDevelopment Benchmark
  • 22. Development of Level 3 - eLearning How is Level 3 eLearning Defined? The following definitions were used to collect survey data… VERY IMPORTANT: It is important to understand that these definitions were written to be relatively broad by design. Having conducted similar surveys for many years, we’ve found that defining the exact framework of each level makes it virtually impossible for survey respondents to reply (unless their courses just happen to match the definition completely). By allowing for some interpretation, we have found that these guidelines yield the desired results, especially since respondents are also allowed to list low range, average, and high range based on further characteristics of learning content development.
  • 23. Development of Level 3 - eLearning Overall Times and Ranges NOTE: Several respondents listed times greater than 2000+ hours of development per finished hour (very advanced learning simulations and games) 716:1 490:1 217:1
  • 24. Development of Level 3 eLearning Itemized Development Tasks – How much time is spent in each area through the development process? Snapshot: Average time allocation by task and time spent (all respondents) Number of hours of development time in each task, per finished hour (people hours) = 490 hours Based on average of 490 development hours, per finished hour of Level 3 eLearning NOTE: Times reflect time spent by all members of the development team including: instructional designers, writers, subject matter experts (SME), graphic artists, authors, media producers, project managers, etc.
  • 25. Development of Level 3 eLearning How much are organizations spending, on average, per-finished-hour, to create Level 3 eLearning? $50,371 We asked respondents: List (if known) your average, internal cost for creating 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning. The cost shown is the average
  • 26. Development of Level 3 eLearning Combining Average Time and Average Cost to Estimate Development Costs Variables: * Average time of development per finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: 490 ** Average cost of development for 1 finished hour of Level 3 eLearning: $50,371 NOTE: The numbers above assume that all tasks are repeated for each hour of instruction. The study did not explore the efficiency and reduction of time for longer courses by task.
  • 28. Development Ratios - Summary ILT, Level 1 eLearning (Basic), Level 2 eLearning (Interactive), Level 3 eLearning (Advanced)
  • 29. Average Cost Comparisons - Summary ILT, Level 1 eLearning (Basic), Level 2 eLearning (Interactive), Level 3 eLearning (Advanced)
  • 30. Blended LearningBenchmark of Blended Learning Components
  • 31. Blended Learning Components Radar chart showing components most frequently used as part of a blended learning course (across all respondents)
  • 32. Blended Learning Components Components used most frequently as part of a blend
  • 33. Blended Learning Components Average mix of major components: Classroom, Virtual Classroom and E-Learning (survey respondents)
  • 34. Blended Learning What is the average size of a Blended Learning Course? …and what are organizations typically paying for internal development of blended learning (on average)? NOTE: These were asked as three separate questions. Components used in blend Typical length of blend Average cost of blend We realize that this data doesn’t mesh well with previous questions about development per finished hour ratios. If you average out the costs, it would seem to suggest that blended learning is created at a rate of $809 per finished hour ($25,900 divided by 32). We thought it would be helpful to share the data anyway. Please understand these constraints when interpreting the data $25,900 Average Duration 32 hours Average Configuration
  • 35.
  • 36. finding and applying learning industry research; custom research projects
  • 37. optimizing or establishing your learning governance approach
  • 38. exploring best practices for rapid learning development
  • 39. learning strategy “jam sessions” (available as a 2-hour block, full-day onsite, or as a workshop)
  • 40. Click here for more available servicesContact information: Bryan Chapman Chief Learning Strategist Chapman Alliance (801) 568-7011 bryan@chapmanalliance.com www.chapmanalliance.com