Wind turbine final report

3
Executive Summary
Objective:
Wind turbine designs are always striving for improved performance and ways to maximize the
number of benefits. Our team was tasked with developing a rotation system that would maximize
electrical yield in any wind conditions to improve the design of horizontal axis wind turbines.
This solution had to meet a series of stringent requirements that were verified by inspection,
demonstration, or analysis. These requirements included topics such as structure, performance,
energy yield, interaction, and control. Furthermore, our team had to address the problem with
wind turbines causing avian fatalities. With these elements in mind, an effective design proposal
for rotating wind turbines was formed by our team that would improve performance, decrease
expenses, meet all requirements, and reduce avian fatalities.
Solution:
Our team analyzed 4 possible solutions to rotate a wind turbine: an upwind yaw drive with
motor, a fan (resembling a helicopter tail), a rudder tail (similar to a weathervane), and a
downwind design. After researching and analyzing multiple possibilities using our criteria for
Pahl and Beitz analysis, our team selected the downwind turbine design as our solution. A
downwind turbine is similar to a typical upwind turbine. An upwind turbine functions by having
a motor rotate the blades and nacelle atop a ball bearing yaw drive to place it in to oncoming
wind. A downwind turbine differs from this design by having the blades and rotor face
downwind. By relocating the side of the tower that the wind hits the blades, rotation is achieved
from drag on the turbine’s blades. This is similar to how a windsock rotates in the wind. The
implications of this change in design are advantageous when compared to the upwind design.
The first implication is that there is no need of a motor, and its associated sensors and computers,
to power the yaw drive rotation. This results in less noise, weight, components, and expenses to
achieve the same result. This means that our design’s only component is a ball-bearing yaw
drive, or a low friction surface, for rotation. The second implication is that under unique
geographic and atmospheric conditions, a downwind turbine design is superior to other
proposals. Due to the angle of incidence with the wind, a downwind turbine’s blades achieve
better energy yield on a hill or mountainside compared to an upwind design. In addition, if
atmospheric conditions are stormy with high and erratic wind speeds, a downwind design
maintains performance and its structural integrity better than other designs. To reduce the
number of avian fatalities, a flashing light system that irritates specific types of birds will be
implemented in our mechanism’s design.
Conclusion:
A downwind turbine design exceeds all of our requirements by weighing less, being more cost-
effective, requiring fewer parts, and achieving the same rotation results (or better) than other
turbine rotation possibilities. It is for these reasons why our team selected a downwind design as
our solution and for the implementation in future wind turbines.

4
Table of Contents
Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................3
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................5
Background .................................................................................................................................................6
Final Problem Solution...............................................................................................................................8
Appendices.................................................................................................................................................13
Appendix A: Alternative Solutions......................................................................................................14
Appendix B: Pahl and Beitz Evaluation Matrix ................................................................................21
Appendix C: Explanation of Evaluation Criteria ..............................................................................22
Appendix D: Requirements and Verifications ...................................................................................23
Appendix E: Final Project Solution Team Plan.................................................................................27
Appendix F: Research Paper 1 ............................................................................................................28
Appendix G: Research Paper 2............................................................................................................55
References..................................................................................................................................................77

5
Introduction
Purpose:
In recent history, there has been a significant increase in the search for alternative sources of
energy. Wind energy is one of the cleanest sources of energy today, however it is not the most
efficient. One of the major problems with wind energy is that the wind turbines do not always
face the wind, and therefore do not always produce energy. Our engineering team was asked to
design a horizontal axis wind turbine that will solve this very problem. In thinking about our
problem, our team came up with several solutions that were critically analyzed and evaluated,
which led us to a final design for a new horizontal axis wind turbine.
Task:
Our team was asked to design a mechanism that would rotate a
horizontal axis wind turbine to face the wind based on current wind
conditions. In addition, we were told that a mechanism that could
minimize avian fatalities would be favorable. Before we designed
solutions to our problem, we had to generate a list of requirements,
and we also had to research specifics about wind turbines, what
repels and attracts birds, and what materials would be best to use to
support the weight of a turbine and rotate it (see Appendix for list
of requirements). The research that was done by each member of
our team was put into two research papers, with the second research
paper including answers to questions about possible solutions that
were designed by pairs in the team. It was decided by our team that
the solution that would win would be chosen using a uniform
grading criteria.
Solution:
Our team evaluated the 4 best solutions that we came up with using the Paul & Beitz criteria, which
can be found in the Appendix. After having a team discussion about all 4 solutions and filling out
the matrices, the final solution that was picked was a solution involving a downwind turbine. Once
wind hits the turbine, the force of the wind hitting the blades will create drag, and this drag will
force the blades to want to rotate to the farthest position away from the wind. This means that the
nacelle will rotate, and the blades will be facing downwind, therefore the turbine will be considered
a downwind turbine. There will not be a need for several extra parts; this solution is extremely cost
efficient. It also does not require a power source, which is another huge advantage. The only part
that will be needed is a low friction ball bearing and a breaking system.
Conclusion:
The downwind turbine will be an excellent way to keep the turbine facing the wind at all times.
There is no need for a power source, and there is no need for expensive extra parts, such as a motor.
This solution is cheap and simple, and easy to integrate into the future wind turbines. This solution
is solving an issue that is not only present in our nation, but one that is present worldwide. This
report will go through the steps that were taken in order to reach this solution, and how certain
crucial decisions were made.
Figure 1: An example of a
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine
(HAWT)

6
Background
Background Introduction:
Wind power has been a valuable resource for centuries, and in recent years this resource has
become even more useful as a source for electrical power. It has many advantages over
traditional fossil fuel power sources, releasing no greenhouse gasses during energy production
and having very low impact on the local environment while doing so. Companies are constantly
looking for new ways to improve efficiency in their products, and one area that could be focused
in horizontal axis wind turbines is the mechanism used for yaw axis rotation. Improvements in
this area would result in less energy and material used with more energy produced.
Brief history of wind power:
Wind power has been used since antiquity as an alternative to water mills for the grinding of
grain, being built in places with small or slow moving bodies of water. The earliest examples
found are vertical axis wind turbines, built in ancient
Persia. These designs made their way through the
western world and eventually developed into the
horizontal axis turbine in the early middle ages. In the
more southern lands of Europe these windmills were
often built of solid stone, with the blades facing in
one direction, with no ability or need to rotate, as the
winds in those areas were consistent in their patterns
(Hill, 1994). In more northern areas however,
especially England and the Low Countries that would
become Belgium and the Netherlands, these
windmills were built of wood. Eventually these mills developed an early form of yaw axis
rotation, namely having oxen or strong horses drive a shaft through a series of gears to rotate the
upper portion of the windmill so that the blades caught more wind(Hill, 1994).
These windmills continued to develop and complete more tasks
that just grinding grain. In the Netherlands they were used to
pump sea water out of the ground. They were brought across the
Atlantic to the New World. There they were used to draw water
from underground reservoirs in the under developed the North
American West during the 19th
century (Hill, 1994).
Wind turbines as we know them developed during the start of the
20th
century, though due to the infancy of environmental concern
of fossil fuels, they did not become widespread nor largely
developed until the 1970s (Hill, 1994). With the spurring of
investment by private companies and public subsidies wind
power finally began to become widespread in the 1990s.
Figure 2, Iberian windmills, late medieval
Figure 3, Danish windmill, early 19th
century

7
Yaw Axis rotation in Horizontal axis
Turbines:
Currently the vast majority of wind
turbine rotate the top of the tower holding
the gear box, blades, and turbine itself by
using a series of electrical motors
connected to a central gear ring (Figure 3).
Due to the immense size of nacelle, often
weighing several tons, huge amounts of
torque and therefor very powerful motors
are needed in order to turn the nacelle into
the wind and keep it there (Hau, 2006).
The motors receive signals to turn from sensors located on top of the nacelle. These sensors,
usually an electric weather vane which direction the wind is coming from and an anemometer
which measures the strength of the wind. Together these signals are sent to a small computer or
chip that reads them and sends the appropriate signals to the motors (Hau, 2006).
Concluding Remarks:
While current designs are adequate for the job of turning wind turbines, improvements can be
made and should be sought out. Anything that can reduce material used, energy consumed or
increase energy produced is something to be sought after. Doing so helps to fulfil the twin goal
of wind turbines, to be economically friendly and provide energy.
Figure 4, Electric motor yaw drive with four motors

8
Final Problem Solution
Problem Statement:
Develop a mechanism that would vary the position of horizontal axis wind turbines to maximize
electrical output in any wind conditions.
Solution Description:
Our team’s solution is a downwind turbine rotation mechanism. A downwind turbine rotates on a
low friction ball bearing yaw drive similar to a motorized upwind turbine. The difference
between the two is that there are no motors, sensors or computers that power and control the
rotation of a downwind turbine. Instead, downwind turbine designs take advantage of drag from
the wind to rotate into the ideal position automatically without the need of any additional energy
or components. The principles behind how a downwind turbine rotates are the same as the
principles that cause a wind sock or weathervane is always position themselves furthest
downwind from the direction of the wind. Downwind turbines offer many benefits over the
traditional upwind turbine designs such as enhanced performance on a hill and improved control
during stormy weather or a blackout. These benefits make downwind turbines more suitable for
harvesting wind energy than upwind turbines under unique geographic and atmospheric
conditions.
How Solution Meets Evaluation Criteria:
Wind turbine designs strive for improved electrical yield, reliability, efficiency, and low
maintenance. With this in mind, many different types of wind turbines, all with varying features,
benefits, and disadvantages, have been produced. This section will discuss the various
advantages and disadvantages of downwind turbines and their prospects for future wind energy
generation.
A downwind turbine differs from an upwind turbine by its location of rotor and blades. A
downwind turbine has its blades positioned downwind of the tower. See figure 5 for a
visualization of the difference in structure between a downwind and upwind turbine.

9
Figure 5: The location of the blades and rotor define what type of horizontal axis wind turbine it
is ("Downwind Rotor," n.d.).
There are many differences between the upwind and downwind turbine designs. Each design’s
components, especially the rotation mechanism, are altered to adapt to the differences in
aerodynamic and physical performance associated with each type of turbine. In other words,
each type of turbine has different components because they function differently from one
another. Because the mechanism used to vary the position of the horizontal axis wind turbine
design and the overall turbine design are so interconnected, the range of material in the
discussion of benefits and disadvantages will be extended to include the overall turbine, not just
the rotation mechanism. To clarify, the upwind turbine will be associated with the motorized
active rotation method and computerized control system and the downwind turbine associated
with the free rotation method and no computer control system. These differences will be
discussed in accordance with the criteria of our team’s Pahl and Beitz matrices on the basis that
the same factors that are ideal for the rotation mechanism are similarly ideal for the overall
turbine design.
Control:
The control criterion deals with the turbine’s ability to sense the surrounding wind conditions
and respond accordingly using the rotation mechanism. For an upwind turbine, this mechanism
would be a motor attached to the yaw drive and controlled by a computer system. The computer
system would analyze the atmospheric conditions and use the motor to position the wind turbine
into the direction of oncoming wind (Manwell et al., 2002). Figure 6 shows the layout of an
upwind turbine. It is important to note that the difference between an upwind turbine and
downwind turbine is the lack of a motor driving the rotation.

10
Figure 6: The yaw drive motor used on an upwind turbine (noted as number 7 in the image)
("Wind Energy: Product and Solutions," n.d.).
Unlike an upwind turbine, a downwind turbine does not require any additional motors, computer
systems, components or energy to rotate since downwind is the natural position that the turbine
would be drawn towards (Manwell et al., 2002). This is based off of the principle that the rotors
and blades would create drag in the wind and rotate to the position furthest downwind as
possible. Because the downwind turbine capitalizes on this property, it is able to rotate more
efficiently than the upwind turbine and its rotation mechanism can function even in the case of
power failure (Matsunobu et al., 2009). The actual rotation mechanism would be similar to the
upwind rotation mechanism in the above image, except it would lack the motors and control
systems.
Performance:
The performance criterion deals with the mechanism’s ability to operate in as wide a range of
wind conditions and capture as much energy from the wind as possible. Under certain
circumstances, a free yaw control (free rotation) turbine with the rotors placed downwind is
advantageous over an upwind, active yaw control turbine. Besides the energy and control
benefits mentioned above, the downwind turbine also maintains stability through very high
winds. This is due in part to the turbine being able to adjust freely to large gusts and irregular
wind patterns. An upwind turbine must try to adapt to the same conditions using sensors and
motors, which would be more difficult given the circumstances (Manwell et al., 2002). In
addition, a downwind turbine would function better on a hill or mountain. Since the blades of a
wind turbine must be angled away from the tower to prevent them from striking it in the event of
high winds, a downwind turbine is better angled for wind flowing uphill ("Downwind Rotor,"
n.d.).

11
Figure 7 (left image): Demonstrates how wind blowing up strikes the blades at a greater
incidental angle, providing more energy (downwind rotor on left, upwind on right). The yellow
arrow is the ideal angle that wind would strike the blades of that turbine design and the grey
arrow is the actual angle of the wind. Notice how the downwind turbine (left) has the wind strike
the blades at an angle closer to the ideal angle ("Downwind Rotor," n.d.).
Figure 8 (right image): Wind vector model showing how the downwind turbine is better suited
for wind traveling uphill than an upwind turbine. The wind is nearly perpendicular to the blades
of the downwind turbine, providing a larger energy yield compared to the upwind turbine, where
the wind is nearly parallel (“Downwind Rotor,” n.d.).
However, these benefits are only found on a downwind turbine positioned uphill or in a
mountainous location. On level ground or at sea, the turbines would produce nearly identical
amounts of energy. It is also important to note that these effects to not work similarly downhill
for an upwind turbine. Wind does not travel downhill very well since it loses the majority of its
energy and will have increased turbulence after going over a hill or mountain. Both of these
effects result in scenarios less than ideal for harnessing wind energy (Matsunobu et al., 2009).
Structure:
The structure criterion concerns the materials used in the rotation mechanism and their impact on
the performance of the overall turbine. The materials would ideally be durable, light, and
recyclable. The downwind turbine excels in this area because it requires far fewer materials than
the upwind turbine since its yaw rotation is free, not actively controlled (Manwell et al., 2002).
However, by using a downwind system, problems arise that come at a cost to the overall turbine.
The center housing of the gearbox and generator atop of the tower that attaches to the rotor and
blades is called the nacelle. The nacelle is upwind of the rotor and blades in a downwind turbine
design and this creates turbulence or wake known as tower shadow (Manwell et al., 2002).
Tower shadow can cause unequal loads along the rotor and blades leading to fatigue damage and
increased noise. This is one of the reasons why downwind turbines have been less popular than
their upwind counterparts. However, with the significant increase in both turbine size and
capacity, and improved aerodynamics of the nacelle, tower shadow is being reduced. As a
turbine’s size increases, its blades extend far beyond the nacelle and accordingly receive less
tower shadow. As a result, downwind turbines are becoming a more popular solution for
harnessing wind energy (Matsunobu et al., 2009).

12
Energy:
This criterion concerns the ability of the mechanism to aid the turbine in maximum energy yield.
Both mechanisms of the upwind and downwind turbine designs rotate the rotor and blades into
the optimal angle for generating electricity. The only difference is that the upwind design
requires electricity to operate the sensors, computers and motors while the downwind system
does not require any electricity. In general though, both designs produce a similar electrical yield
(Manwell et al., 2002).
Interaction:
This criterion involves the relationship of the mechanism with various populations. Ideally, the
mechanism should be quiet and have as small an impact as possible on people and nearby
wildlife. Both mechanisms have slight drawbacks but overall have a negligible influence on the
environment. The upwind turbine would have to reduce the noise made by its motors when
rotating the rotor and blades. The downwind turbine would produce increased noise from the
effects of tower shadow on the turbine’s blades (Manwell et al., 2002).
Cost:
This criterion relates to the overall economic viability of the mechanism. The downwind turbine
again has an advantage over the upwind turbine because of the lack of sensors, motors,
computers, and batteries or capacitors to run those systems and still resulting with on par, if not
better, electrical output (Manwell et al., 2002). However, it is important to note that the effects of
tower shadow could lead to increased fatigue and a possible increase in the long term cost of the
turbine if maintenance work is required more frequently. Similarly, the larger number of
components on the upwind turbine could result in more parts to fail and more maintenance work
(Matsunobu et al., 2009).
Conclusion:
There are many advantages and disadvantages of the downwind turbine rotation mechanism
compared to the traditional upwind turbine rotation mechanism. The downwind design has many
benefits over the upwind design due to the lack of expensive components, ability to function
more efficiently uphill, and the ability to remain more stable under extreme winds or in the case
of a power failure. Some noted disadvantages are the effects of tower shadow and its long term
impact on reliability and an increase in noise. However, with the creation of larger turbines, the
effects of tower shadow are minimized to a point that the downwind turbine design becomes
favorable over the upwind turbine design (Matsunobu et al., 2009).

14
Appendix A: Alternative Solutions
Alternative Solution I: Yaw Drive Mechanism
Our Mechanism utilizes a series of sensors to determine current wind speed and direction. The
information received will be processed and will send signals to the motor. The nacelle will then
be attached to a ball and bearings, which will enable it to rotate. The motor will turn a series of
gears that will turn the nacelle. As you can see in figure 9, the yaw system will be placed in
between the tower and the nacelle. The gears, or yaw drive, will be attached to the ball and
bearings, which will then turn the nacelle to face the wind. According to our Pahl & Beitz
criteria, the most important categories are Control and Performance, and Structure. Our design
satisfies the control category very well, because using a motor and yaw drive will be a very
effective way to turn a turbine, as similar systems are used to turn the turrets on tanks and ships.
Since the mechanism will be within the tower, it will be able to operate regardless of the wind
conditions. The materials that will be used in the mechanism are going to be very strong and
durable, so our mechanism satisfies the structure category very well. Energy is the next most
important category, and while our mechanism may require more energy to operate than other
solutions, the energy is not a very significant category in our Paul & Bitz criteria, so the energy
required to operate the motor is of little importance. The last two criteria are Interactions and
Cost. Since our mechanism is almost entirely inside the turbine, it will have no new effects on
any populations. While this does not solve the issue of avian deaths, it will not contribute to any
more deaths. Building this mechanism might be more costly than other possible solutions, but
since there is no budget for our project, the cost has very little significance.
Figure 9

15
Alternative Solution II: Fan Mechanism
The prevalent issue with wind technology is that wind turbines are unable to effectively adapt to
their environment. Wind is unpredictable, and in order for turbines to operate efficiently they
must be able to adapt to their surrounding environment. In other words, “go with the flow”. The
device that is about to be described will vary the position of a wind turbine and optimally align it
so it can operate at its maximum potential. The device is called The Fan Mechanism and it can
be integrated into almost all horizontal axis wind turbines. The mechanism utilizes multiple
sensors and meteorological data to position itself in a direction that will allow the turbine to
produce the most energy.
The Fan Mechanism can visually be compared to the tail of a helicopter, and it happens to
operate in a similar way. The tail of a helicopter has a rotor (fan) at the end that stabilizes the
helicopter and changes its direction. The mechanism will enable the upper portion of the wind
turbine to rotate 360 degrees about the vertical axis. For a visual representation of the
mechanism, please refer to figure ten and elven below.
Figure 10
Figure 11

16
The upper portion of the wind turbine will rotate on a low friction surface when given rotational
energy from the fan at the end of the tail. All of this enables the mechanism to operate while
requiring minimal energy. Figure twelve provides a visual representation of the low friction part
of the mechanism.
Figure 12
The tail of the mechanism will extend a certain distance from the structure out into the air
(Figure 13). Attached at the end of this structure will be the fan (Figure 14). The fan, when
given a signal, will turn on and rotate the turbine blades and generator to an optimal energy
producing position. When the turbine is optimally aligned, the fan will shut off and a braking
system will lock it in place.
Figure 13
Figure 14

17
An additional feature of the mechanism is that it can operate without the use of electrical energy
when necessary. Having the mechanism operate like a fantail can do this. The fantail came
about in 1870 and it is a device that automatically rotated windmills directly into the wind.
When the Fan Mechanism needs to conserve energy, it can operate like a fantail (Figure 15).
(Lytham Windmill Museum).
Figure 15
The Fan Mechanism effectively meets the entire criterion in the Pahl and Beitz. Below, we will
describe how each criterion was met.
Control was given the highest weighting factor of 0.30. Because of such a high weighting factor,
it was the focal point of our solution. The Fan Mechanism will be able to align itself into an
optimal energy producing position at a moment’s notice. Sensors, attached to the mechanism,
will signal the fan to rotate with a certain frequency. The frequency of the fans rotation will
determine the speed at which the upper portion of the turbine rotates. The sensors then signal the
fan to stop rotating and a braking system to go into effect when the turbine is optimally aligned.
The turbine can potentially be aligned within a few centimeters of its optimal position.
Performance was given the second highest weighting of 0.20. It was also given careful
consideration when we produced our design. The Fan Mechanism will be able to perform in all
conditions. It is durable to extreme weather and is able to operate in low wind speeds as well.
The mechanism has the ability to operate like a fantail, which enables it to operate without
requiring electrical energy.
Structure, also given a weight of 0.20. The device is relatively simple and few parts are needed
for its construction. The device consists of only three main parts to be exact. These parts are the
rotational hub, tail, and fan. The device is also not excessively large and can be transported with
ease
Energy was given a weight of 0.15. It requires minimal energy to operate, due to the low friction
surface it sits on as well as having the fan extended from the structure. The mechanism can also
operate without electrical energy, as stated before, by acting like a fantail.
Interaction was given a weight of 0.10. The device makes almost no noise, due to the low
friction surface and quiet fan blade. It will also not negatively interact with the environment and
nearby populations. It will also prevent bird collisions due the light system on the tail of the
http://www.lythamwindmill.co.uk/The-Mill-and-Its-Workings.html

18
mechanism
Cost was given the smallest weight of 0.05. Materials for construction are relatively inexpensive
and long lasting. Few parts (three) are required for construction. The highest costing material
will be the low friction surface it sits on which in return will help the turbine produce more
energy and thus increase its cost effectiveness.

19
Alternative Solution III: Sail Mechanism
Our mechanism enables the wind turbine to rotate with the help of a sail/tail vane and a
frictionless surface. The frictionless horizontal surface enables the turbine to rotate efficiently.
Included with the mechanism is a locking system. This will lock the turbine into the ideal
horizontal position to harvest wind and make sure that it does not continuously keep spinning.
The locking device that was created is shown in figure 17.
In regards to the Pahl and Beitz criteria, the solution’s structure will be durable with no moving
parts. The only possible worry is if the tail vane gives out to any strong winds. The solution’s
control will be dependent on the tail vane and locking system. The tail vane rotates the wind
turbine and changes the position it is facing, while the locking device locks the turbine into
position. The solution’s performance will be similar to general wind turbines already; none of the
main energy-harvesting aspects will be affected. Therefore the energy obtained by the turbine
will be quite similar to already existing turbines. The solution’s energy efficiency will be great.
The wind turbine is rotated through the use of wind; therefore no energy is technically needed for
the wind turbine to work, but minimal energy will be used for the locking device, which will
include a wind sensor, wiring, and pressure sensor pads. The solution’s interaction with the
public should be very minimal. The addition of a tail vane shouldn’t disrupt or bother any close
neighborhoods or visitors. The solution’s cost should be cheaper than traditional motors. The
frictionless surface could be expensive, but even if it is expensive, our turbine would cost just
about the same as already existing mechanisms.
Figure 16

21
Appendix B: Pahl and Beitz Evaluation Matrix
DESIGN CANDIDATE
ONE
DESIGN CANDIDATE
TWO
DESIGN CANDIDATE
THREE
DESIGN CANDIDATE
FOUR
Criteria
Weightin
g Factor
(W)
Numerical
Value
(NV1)
Weighted
Value
(W*NV1)
Numerical
Value
(NV2)
Weighted
Value
(W*NV2)
Numerical
Value
(NV3)
Weighted
Value
(W*NV3)
Numerical
Value
(NV4)
Weighted
Value
(W*NV3)
Structure 0.20 1.83 0.366 2.00 0.400 1.67 0.3340 1.42 0.2840
Energy 0.15 1.50 0.225 2.00 0.300 1.00 0.1500 1.83 0.2745
Control 0.30 1.50 0.450 1.00 0.300 1.67 0.5010 1.67 0.5010
Performance 0.20 1.00 0.200 1.67 0.334 1.33 0.2660 1.33 0.2660
Interaction 0.10 1.50 0.150 1.33 0.133 1.33 0.1330 1.50 0.1500
Cost 0.05 1.00 0.050 2.00 0.100 1.17 0.0585 1.50 0.0750
Total 1.00 1.441 1.567 1.4425 1.5505

22
Appendix C: Explanation of Evaluation Criteria
Control:
Control was given a weighting factor of 0.30 because it is the most important characteristic of
the mechanism. It addresses the core aspects of the problem statement and has the largest impact
on energy output of the turbine.
Performance:
Performance was given a weighting factor of 0.20 because the mechanism must perform
optimally in order to enable the wind turbine to operate in all wind conditions.
Structure:
Structure was given a weighting factor of 0.20. This is because the materials used as well as their
durability, weight, etc, are critical to the operation of the mechanism
Energy:
Energy was given a weighting factor of 0.15. While it is an important criteria for the project, the
energy required to operate the mechanism is not of high importance. As long as it operates
effectively, the CEO will be satisfied.
Interaction:
Interaction was given a weighting factor of 0.10. This is because the way in which the
mechanism impacts populations and the environment is not of utmost importance to the CEO. It
is, however, a criteria that will be considered when designing the mechanism.
Cost:
The cost of the mechanism was given the lowest weighting factor of 0.05 because designing a
mechanism that is cost efficient is not in our problem statement, however a cost efficient design
would be favorable.

23
Appendix D: Requirements and Verifications
Definition:
An electrical energy company shall be the user.
[HAWT 1.1] The mechanism shall be able to rotate the turbine.
A downwind turbine operates on the principle of drag to rotate the device downwind
automatically and at the optimal angle. This rotation method has been proven to work on large
scale turbines and consumes no energy. This requirement is verified by inspection.
[HAWT 1.2] The mechanism shall use minimum energy while maximizing energy output.
The mechanism will require no external energy, and will automatically turn towards the wind,
thereby maximizing energy output. This requirement will be verified by analysis using a diagram
that demonstrates energy flow to exemplify no energy utilization and motion of the mechanism.
[HAWT 1.3] The design will have minimal impact on local populations.
Our design will not use any motors or other mechanical means to turn the turbine, resulting in
significantly less noise pollution caused by the motors of an upwind turbine design. The
requirement is verified by inspection.
[STRUC 2.1] The mechanism shall operate reliably within the temperature range of -30ºC (-
22ºF) to 55ºC (131ºF). {HAWT 1.1}
According to Protecting Wind Turbines in Extreme Temperatures (2013), modern wind turbines
need to operate within a temperature range of -30ºC (-22ºF) to 55ºC (131ºF). Wind turbines
today are designed to operate within this temperature range. The battery and motor system of
traditional turbines are most vulnerable with regards to change in temperature and usually need
to operate between 0 degrees and 10 degrees Celsius. Because the mechanism our team is
designing does not include a battery and motor system, it can operate over a wider range of
temperatures than traditional turbines. Therefore, this requirement for our mechanism is verified.
This is verified by analysis (Protecting Wind Turbines in Extreme Temperatures, 2013).
[STRUC 2.2] The mechanism shall be able to withstand a relative humidity of at least 95%.
{HAWT 1.1}
According to Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application, conventional wind
turbines can withstand a relative humidity of at least 95%. Our design differs from a
conventional wind turbine by the lack of a motor and the location of the blades. There are no
new parts introduced. Thus, the materials used are not affected and the ability to withstand at
least 95% humidity shall be the same. This is verified by analysis.

24
[STRUC 2.3] The materials for construction shall cost less than $30000. {HAWT 1.1}
According to the American Wind Energy Association, the average cost is around 30,000 (FAQs
for Small Wind Systems, 2013). Since the downwind turbine is essentially an existing wind
turbine with the fan positioned at the opposite end of the mechanism with no additional parts, the
cost must be less than $30,000 if put under the same constraints. FAQs for small wind systems.
(2013, January 1). FAQs for small wind systems. Retrieved May 7, 2014, from
https://www.awea.org/Issues/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=4638&navItemNumber=727Thus,
without a motor and computer system, the new design must cost less, verified by analysis.
[STRUC 2.4] The weight of the transport truck and mechanism shall not exceed 80,000 lbs. This
is the legal combined weight limit of an 18 wheeler and its cargo in the United States. {HAWT
1.1}
This requirement will be met because our design does not plan on increasing the weight of any
one part but rather decreasing the weight of wind turbines today by removing the yaw drive
motors. Because certain components are being removed, the overall weight of the mechanism
will certainly decrease. According to the US department of transportation, a weight limit for a
transport truck is 80,000 pounds. Our mechanism is expected to weigh less than a nacelle which
currently weigh about 100,000 pounds (Benini & Toffolo, 2002). This weight is mainly due to
the yaw drive mechanism which contributes to approximately more than 20% of the nacelles
weight. Because this component is removed the nacelle the weight will fall below 80,000
pounds and therefore this requirement is verified. This requirement is verified by inspection
("Commercial Vehicle Size and Weight Program," n.d.).
[STRUC 2.5] The materials for construction shall be able to last at least 20 years, while able to
support at least 100 Tons, as the combined weight of the nacelle and the blades of the tower will
add up to a minimum of 92 tons. {HAWT 1.1}
According to Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application, the metal alloys and
materials used in rotation mechanisms are designed to last at least 20 years. Most turbines
created today are designed with nearly a 30 year lifespan and in the case of a downwind turbine,
the rotation mechanism is rarely the first major component to fail. In addition, newer wind
turbines are being created that are ever larger and heavier. The size of the ball bearing yaw drive
required is documented and can be modified to handle any weight requirement (Manwell,
McGowan, & Rogers, 2002).
[STRUC 2.6] The mechanism should be designed with recycled materials. {HAWT 1.1}
There are current models of wind turbines that are designed and built with recycled materials.
Therefore, our design will utilize the same methods and produce a structure using biodegradable
materials. Downwind turbines do not require any additional components than a traditional
upwind design and thus, will be constructed with recycled materials as it has been done before
with upwind designs. Current journal articles, specifically one written by Schleisner goes into
detail about turbine recycling as well as what materials are required to produce a turbine. By
inspecting and analyzing current wind turbine designs discussed in this journal article, our group

25
is confident that this requirement is verified. This requirement is verified by analysis and
inspection (Schleisner, 2000).
[STRUC 2.7] The design shall withstand all wind conditions. {HAWT 1.1}
Discovered through technical research, the downwind design is able to function in much higher
speeds compared to other means of horizontal axis rotation. The only hard limit on the wind
conditions is the condition of the blades, gearbox and the turbine of the structure. This is verified
through inspection.
[CTRL 2.1] The mechanism shall rotate the wind turbine based on the current wind conditions.
{HAWT 1.1}
The mechanism that our group is designing is a downwind turbine. A downwind turbine does not
require a motor or sensors to change its position. The rotors and blades are positioned in a certain
way that creates a force that automatically turns the turbine. Essentially, the turbine moves by the
power of the wind. It moves in a position that is furthest downwind so it can produce the most
amount of energy. The turbine repositions itself based on the current wind conditions by using
the power of the wind and drag forces. Typical wind turbines are designed to be upwind. If one
were to compare an upwind turbine to a ball in a valley, it requires a lot of energy to move the
ball. With regard to a downwind turbine, imagine a ball on top of a hill, minimal energy is
required to move the ball. Both balls are in equilibrium. However, the ball on top of the hill, the
downwind case, is much easier to move. This idea applies to wind turbines as well. Therefore,
this requirement for our mechanism is verified by inspection via the solid edge model as well as
analysis through research (Matsunobu et al., 2009).
[CTRL 2.2] The mechanism shall detect various wind conditions (direction, speed). {HAWT
1.1}
According to Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application, a downwind turbine is
faster at responding to changes in the wind than any motorized system. This is due to the fact
that any change in direction of the wind results in a change in force and results in an
instantaneous response by the system, all without the use of computers, sensors, or motors
(Manwell, McGowan, & Rogers, 2002). This requirement is verified by inspection.
[PERF 2.1] The mechanism shall be designed to require little maintenance. {HAWT 1.1}
Our design is built to require little maintenance because we are not adding any parts that are not
in wind turbine designs today. If anything, our design would require less maintenance because
we are removing the yaw drive motors from the turbine. The requirement is verified by
inspection.
[PERF 2.2] The mechanism shall not disrupt the wind turbine’s performance. {HAWT 1.1}
The final designed mechanism functions because of the wind. There are no extra parts other than
the ball-bearings yaw drive needed to allow the turbine to rotate since the rotation force is

26
supplied by drag. Because there are no new parts that could possibly disrupt the wind turbine’s
performance, this requirement is satisfied by inspection.
[PERF 2.3] The design will last at least 20 years under normal operating conditions. {HAWT
1.1}
The downwind design compared to other methods of yaw axis rotation have many fewer moving
parts, principally being the steel bearings that the nacelle sits upon. While these have been
known to fail on larger wind turbines, since the downwind design is smaller and lighter, the
bearings are relatively easy to replace compared to other parts used in yaw rotation in other
designs. Thus, the requirement is satisfied by inspection.
[ENER 2.1] The mechanism shall utilize internal energy from the wind turbine {HAWT 1.2}.
To verify this requirement through analysis, a diagram of the energy flow in the wind turbine
system will demonstrate the use of wind against the blades to turn the turbine. Wind is used,
rather than electrical motors, to horizontally turn the wind turbine. No internal energy is
required.
[ENER 2.2] The mechanism shall maximize energy output of the wind turbine. {HAWT 1.2}
Since the mechanism will not require any additional energy to operate, it will not be taking away
any energy that the wind turbine produces, which helps maximize energy output. The motor in
current wind turbines can use up to 10% of the total output of an upwind turbine (Miller, 2012).
In a 1.5 Mw turbine, 10% of 1.5 Mw would be saved using our device. Since there would be no
other way to reduce the energy needed to rotate the nacelle, this requirement is verified by
inspection and analysis.
[INT 2.1] The mechanism shall generate less than 85 dB of noise while turning the turbine and
avoid creating sound that is less than 20 Hz in frequency. {HAWT 1.3}
Since the mechanism will not require a motor, and will in fact be taking a motor out of the
current wind turbine design, no motor-generated noise will be created. Since the current wind
turbine designs do not exceed this decibel range already, and we will be removing the motor, we
expect the noise level to be within the acceptable range. This requirement is verified by
inspection as well as analysis from research (Mo̸ller & Pedersen, 2011).
[INT 2.2] The mechanism should be designed to minimize avian fatalities {HAWT 1.3}
Avian forms that are commonly known for being killed by wind turbines have been researched.
These types of birds can normally be irritated by bright flashing lights, such as the type of
airplanes. Therefore, a similar type of light system will be installed on the turbine and will fend
away these birds, satisfying this requirement by inspection.

27
Appendix E: Final Project Solution Team Plan

28
Appendix F: Research Paper 1
To: Professor Neuberger, WTSN 104, Section 57
From: Adam Suda
Date: 2/11/14
Re: Research Paper #1
Problem Statement:
Introduction:
It is a fact of the world that resources are limited and nowhere is this more apparent than for
fossil fuels. In the face of this looming threat, coupled with the growing implications of climate
change brought about by their use, many countries are turning towards alternate means of
producing energy. One such method which is gaining strides is the use of large scale wind
powered turbines to produce electricity to support human populations. This paper will attempt to
cover the problems that can arise in the use of wind turbines, such as structural failure, damage
to the structure (which may lead to casualties of either those who work on the wind turbine
structure or to civilians who may happen to be passing nearby). In addition to these mechanical
failures, this paper will examine some other problems faced by wind turbines which may lead to
damages, such as lightning strikes and ice accumulation.
Structural Damage:
Damages accrued to the structure of the wind turbine occur over time and in many cases are
difficult to avoid. One mean by which turbines are often damaged is when a large scale storm
hits, which results in large amounts of stress on the blades and tower. In some cases the stress
from high speed winds can cause the brakes on the turbine to fail, resulting in the blades
travelling at speeds unsafe for operation. When the blades rotate past certain speeds breakage
and damage can occur, potentially leading to the surrounding areas being subject to blade
fragments (Chia Chen Ciang & Jung-Ryul Lee, 2008, p.7). These blade fragments will be
traveling at very high speeds and can result in deaths and damages to surrounding houses, cars,
or other objects.
The only surefire method unfortunately to prevent these damages to the blades is to either
perform preventive maintenance often so as to catch small damages before they turn into large
problems, or to introduce and maintain an internal sensor network that would tell the company in
charge of the wind turbine when damages would occur, and where they occurred, leading to
fewer maintenance visits, but a higher starting cost due to sensors, and a constant small drain of
electricity to run the sensors.
Another major source of accidents is where the superstructure of the wind turbine, or tower,
outright collapses due to damages. This often results in the death of any person working on the

29
turbine. This damage can be caused by many things, such as fractures of steel and composite
materials from cold stress, or lightning strikes or storms causing damage to the structure, and
high gusts of wind (Rideout, Copes & Bos, 2010, p.3). Fortunately, when a wind turbine outright
collapses, the damage to the surrounding area is mostly localized, compared to when blades fail,
resulting in potentially fewer casualties. All of these factors working together can result in
severe damage to the structure, gearbox, or turbine.
To prevent this from occurring, the turbine must be kept monitored so as to determine any
damages before they might result in large scale setbacks, and the structures themselves made
remote to a limited degree from roads, housing, and other places where the collapse would result
in deaths. However due to the nature of wind turbines requiring very few large objects around
them to steer the wind in on direction or another, maintenance can be very difficult, with the
turbines often being remote to a large degree from residential areas. In addition to this there is
also the matter of the structure being very tall, making repairs difficult and hazardous to workers.
Ice Damage and Ice Flinging:
Especially in colder climates or higher altitudes turbines tend to collect ice along the length of
their blades. The effect of this ice is twofold. Firstly it decreases productivity, by weighing down
the blades, decreasing aerodynamic efficiency. This loss of productivity can be as large as 30 %
in some instances (Dalili, Edrisy & Carriveau, 2009). Secondly, in order to restore productivity
the turbines in some instances need to be shut down entirely so that the blades can be cleaned of
ice. In addition to this, in higher quantities ice adds significantly to the stress load of the blades,
resulting in more accidents, and more maintenance to be required on the turbines. Large chunks
of ice have been known to break off blades as they rotate, resulting in them being ‘flung’, with
some cases the fragments flying up to 100m from the turbines. The inefficiencies and dangers are
a major problem with the growth of the use of wind turbines in colder climates.
However, investigations are currently being made into multipurpose coatings for the turbine
blades which may help reduce the rate of ice accumulation, and therefore the number of stops
made for maintenance of the turbines and to clean the blades, resulting in higher productivity for
these turbines. Another method to pursue in regards to simple human safety is to ensure that the
wind turbines are positioned so that if ice flinging does occur the thrown shards will not damage
any individuals or roadways (Morgan, Bossanyi & Seifert, 2). This can be accomplished by
placing wind turbines a safe distance away from trafficked areas and posting signage to warn of
the possibility of ice flinging should any individual enter the area.
Lightning Strikes and their Effects on Wind Turbines:
The large size of wind turbine’s, their metal structure, and their relative isolation often make
them prime targets for lightning strikes, which can have disastrous results. These can result in
structural damages, damages to internal electronic equipment, and even the turbine. These are all
dangerous and expensive things to deal with in wind turbines, with replacement taking huge
amounts of effort and material.
To properly safeguard against lightning it is recommended to use a conductive material on the

30
blades to reduce to the number of strikes (Chia Chen Ciang & Jung-Ryul Lee, 2008, p.4). In
addition to a blade coating, electronic materials within the turbine need to be properly shielded
and checked often to ensure that damage does not grow over time and that preventive
maintenance can stop any major destruction.
Conclusion:
While many of the articles were mainly tangent to the problem of properly designing a method
for properly implementing a horizontal wind turbine that would rotate for greatest wind
efficiency, these articles were key in showing many of the safety issues that currently prey upon
wind turbines and hold back the industry from growing to fruition. In particular, investigation
should be made into blade coatings that will increase aerodynamic efficiency. In order to design
a turbine that will work anywhere and not be in danger of destructive failure safety must be key
in design. Failure to do so could result in lawsuits from property damage or even injury to
individuals, which should be avoided as these could result in not only loss of revenue, but also a
poorer attitude towards wind turbines which could lead to community action to get turbines
removed or a loss of government grants.
Recommendations:
Any wind turbine built has very key criteria that makes placement of wind farms rather limiting.
It cannot be built too close to any homes or major roadways, because of safety concerns and
potential damages that might be occur against bystanders. Large objects in general such as hills
or rocky outcrops should be avoided as they ‘steer’ the wind and may result in lower velocities
or inconsistent velocities. In addition to this, colder climates should be avoided due to dangers of
ice accumulation and flinging. Maintenance, while costly, should be done regularly to ensure that
the structure is sound and not in need of repairs or replacement of parts. An alternative to
frequent preventive maintenance is to implement a system of sensors on the wind turbine that
would monitor the integrity of the structure and report back to the company in charge of the
turbines so that maintenance can be acted as needed. However this would result in higher build
costs and a constant low drain to electricity. Brakes and blades in particular seem to be prone to
damage and should be checked the most frequently.

31
To: Professor Neuberger
From: Brandon Okraszewski
Date: 2-09-14
Problem Statement:
electrical output in any windy conditions.
Introduction:
With the steady decline of availability of fossil fuels, necessity for renewable resources is
increasing. A forever increasing population calls for a greater demand of energy, therefore bringing
forth greater consumption and an increase in price of fuel. Wind turbines are “the most developed
renewable technology” (Wilkinson et al., p. 1), capable of converting energy from high-speed
winds to electrical energy. As such, wind turbines can act as a suitable replacement for, or in
conjunction with, nonrenewable resources to provide cheaper energy. This paper analyzes
maintenance of wind turbines to provide optimal energy output with minimal cost of reparations
over the course of a lifecycle of the turbines. Determining adequate methods of maintenance and
degradation detection will allow for cost efficiency in the solution of the problem statement.
Cost:
An increase in cost of operation and maintenance lowers profitability of wind farms; income
becomes less than operation and maintenance fees, driving financial supporters away from
investments in wind turbines. Under the equation for cost of energy accepted by the wind energy
research community and Department of energy in the Low Speed Wind Turbine program,
determining factors of the overall cost are initial capital cost, fixed charge rate, replacement cost,
annual energy production and operations and maintenance costs (Walford, p. 5).
Operations and maintenance account for approximately ten to twenty percent of the total cost of
energy; operations refer to the on-site personnel, turbine monitoring and emergency response.
Maintenance becomes further divided into scheduled maintenance, in which standard inspection
and reparations occur, and unscheduled maintenance, in which malfunctions occur that require
attention.
Options suggested by Walford (p. 11) to reduce cost of operations and maintenance include
identification of critical components, determination of causes of failure, development for logistic
plans, improved personnel training, and improved maintainability. The proposed solution to the
problem statement must take into account the different aspects of the cost of energy, specifically
within the operations and maintenance cost while qualifying potential methods to reduce such
costs.

32
Degradation Detection:
Operations, maintenance and replacement costs are dependent upon the reliability of detection of
deterioration. As a result, methods of deterioration detection are of the utmost importance. Systems
of detection must have a high rate of success and determine necessity of repair at an early time
such that rate of production of energy is not impaired.
In determining the optimal maintenance system, cost, time and ability to measure potential to
deteriorate must be taken into account. Once case proved online condition-monitoring system to
be the optimal method of maintenance in test of different models over one-hundred-thousand
simulations in Matlab (Besnard, 2010).
Through the FMEA, or failure modes and effects analysis, manufacturers are granted the ability to
predict turbine failure rates. Using a condition monitoring rig, different components of the wind
turbine are tested to identify the failure rates of each part. Thus parts of new and old designs are
compared to identify the best component to use in future designs (Wilkinson, 2006).
Conclusion:
These articles provide understanding of the components of maintenance, specifically cost and
maintenance systems. As a result, findings from the articles will provide guidelines to follow
during the design phase to produce a cost efficient machine with little need for maintenance. The
proposed solution may avoid components with high failure rates and thus lower cost of operations
and maintenance. In response, the cost of energy will be lowered and attract more financial
investors. This, in turn, will allow for greater funding of development in wind turbine and increased
production of wind farms. The articles further provided information of the different aspects of the
costs of turbines; solutions to the problem statement must not cost a significant amount such that
the cost of replacing and repairing a turbine will increase to outweigh the income of wind farms.
Recommendations:
Based on reading these articles, I would make the following recommendations for our project:
Failure rates of the individual components of wind turbines must be researched to identify parts
that should be used in the final design of our horizontal axis turbine. Following this research, the
parts should be considered in the design to create a turbine with little need for maintenance.
Geography should be taken into account, as parts may function differently under different
environmental conditions. On shore turbines in relation to off shore turbines will degrade quicker
and will require maintenance more often.
Further research must be conducted on income of wind farms to analyze an acceptable price of
production, resources and maintenance. This income may be used to determine profitability when
compared with the cost involved with wind turbines.
The team must always consider lifetime, potential to deteriorate due to time or location,
replacement cost, operations cost and maintenance cost in mind while producing the turbine.

33
Condition over time is relative to cost of energy and energy output, and must be kept satisfactory
by manufacturer’s standards to allow wind turbines to act as an adequate substitute for
nonrenewable resources that are depleting at a rapid rate.

34
From: Brian Parsons
Date: 2/12/14
Problem Statement:
Introduction:
In light of new evidence of climate change, and the resulting stricter environmental regulations,
alternative energy sources are receiving an enormous amount of attention. Scientists, companies,
and countries have invested billions of dollars into the research of new alternative energy
technologies and modifications to optimize both the efficiency and yield from current designs.
Energy derived from wind turbines is among the most promising energy producing technology to
result from this international effort. Sustainable energy scientists have predicted that by 2030,
20% of U.S. energy needs will be met by wind technology (Grujicic, Arakere & Pandurangan,
2010). This paper will discuss the various problems encountered with the traditional horizontal-
axis wind turbine design and provide possible modifications in an attempt to improve reliability,
lifespan, efficiency, and electrical yield. In addition, all of the suggested modifications will be
analyzed on their cost-benefit relationship as any realistic wind turbine design must be
economically viable for it to be considered a success.
Problems Limiting Performance and Lifespan of Wind Turbines:
Wind turbines are typically designed with at least a 20 year fatigue lifespan in mind (Grujicic et
al., 2010). However, some climates create adverse conditions that can result in many problems
for the long term integrity and performance of the turbine. Arctic, desert or tropical climates with
ever-changing wind and thermal conditions can deteriorate the lifespan of the average wind-
turbine and pose many challenges to engineers. One problem that affects all wind turbines is
their operational wind speed range at which they can function. For example, if the wind speed is
too low, the turbine shuts down because it cannot spin the generator. Similarly, if the wind speed
is too high, the turbine shuts down to prevent damage to the critical components of the turbine.
In addition, other phenomenon that pose a risk to all wind turbines are wind shear and the wind
shadowing effect. Wind shear is when there are different wind speeds at different points on the
turbine’s blades. Typically, wind-speed is lower near the ground level portion of the turbine’s
blades compared to the wind-speed at the top. Over time, this creates a bending moment in the
blade shaft and can produce severe jolts and vibrations within the turbine frame (Phresher, 2010).
The wind shadowing effect is much less detrimental to the lifespan of the turbine, but instead
affects large groups of wind turbines in the same area. As more wind turbines are crowded atop
the same mountain or in the same valley, each additional turbine steals energy from the wind to
spin its blades. As a result, there is reduced wind energy for any turbines positioned behind these
turbines. This poses a challenge for the placing of wind turbines as they become an increasingly
popular tool to produce clean energy (Phresher, 2010).

35
Besides general problems, there are many climate-specific problems that wind turbines must
endure. In frigid polar climates, ice buildup along the turbine blades is a frequent problem
(Dalili, Edrisy & Carriveau, 2009). In warmer tropical climates, the accumulation of bugs on the
exterior of the blades can reduce yield by up to 55%. In arid desert environments with an
abundance of loose sand, the blades can be sand-blasted away, changing their profile and
reducing aerodynamic efficiency (Dalili et al., 2009). Of all of these problems previously
discussed, it is ice accumulation that poses the largest problem, especially since there has been
increased interest in the creation of more wind turbines in very cold environments. The reason
for this is that air at -30 ◦C is 26.7% denser than air at 35 ◦C, and since power produced is
proportional to air density, the power output increases in colder temperatures (Dalili et al., 2009).
While there is a litany of problems facing wind turbines, there are many possible modifications
to counteract and even eliminate their threat to the turbine’s performance and lifespan.
Blade Coatings:
A special surface coating spread over the exterior surface of a wind turbine blade can solve many
of the problems described above. Such a coating would be applied like a second layer of paint
and could be custom tailored to address problems unique to the specific environment that the
wind turbine will be placed in (Dalili et al., 2009). For a frigid polar environment, the coating
could be colored black and have specific hydrophobic and low-friction properties to decrease ice
accumulation. This is achieved by creating a surface that would warm in sunlight and would not
be ideal for ice to stick to. These properties would aid efficiency and extend life expectancy in
warmer environments too (Dalili et al., 2009). These coatings also provide slick, non-wetting,
and impact resistant properties that would provide a defense against insect accumulation and
sand abrasion. Besides resisting the accumulation of debris on the blade and creating a more
durable surface, the blade coatings universally provide a decrease in the air drag coefficient of
any turbine, resulting in increased efficiency (Dalili et al., 2009).
Blade coating technology stems from the aerospace industry and the use of coatings on the
surface of airplane wings. The benefit-disadvantage ratio of using a passive method like blade
coatings to counteract these problems is far higher compared to active systems that require
electrical and computational resources. Existing possible active systems are electrical resistance
heating or a pneumatic system to repel water (Dalili et al., 2009). Both of these systems attempt
to tackle the problems associated with ice accumulation. The electrical resistance heating method
requires electrical energy to be run through coils along the turbine’s blade which heat the
exterior and melt any ice. This method has been shown to significantly reduce ice buildup, but it
poses multiple new maintenance problems (Dalili et al., 2009). Most notable of these is when
one of the heating elements malfunctions and ice accumulation occurs on only one of the blades.
This creates a major disruption in the balance of the blades and can result in the turbine being
forced to stop, or even its failure if the problem goes unnoticed for too long. The pneumatic
system uses pressurized air pumped through holes on the surface of the turbine blade to repel
water and expel frozen particles. While typically effective, both of these methods pose an
increased maintenance burden, require electrical energy, and are more costly than passive
methods like blade coatings (Dalili et al., 2009). Blade coatings help turbines deal with complex
environmental issues and help to improve durability and decrease down-time. However, this

36
technology does not aid the turbine in reducing wind-shear effects or help to extend the range of
wind speeds that the turbines can function in; that is where wind optimization technology can
play a crucial role.
Wind Optimization:
Turbine manufacturers are creating multiple methods to optimize turbine performance in a
variety of wind and environmental conditions. Increased attention towards individual blade
control, atmospheric sensing, and improved electromechanical systems have been made in an
attempt to increase durability and electrical yield. One such method involves the use of
individual blade control where monitoring devices attached to each blade observe the wind
speed, load, and many other variables on the blade at that specific moment. Based on this data,
the pitch of that individual blade is adjusted to provide increased efficiency and more electricity
(Phresher, 2010). One of the benefits of this system is the effect it has on reducing wind shear.
When the wind near the ground is traveling at a lower speed than wind at the top of the turbine,
the turbine could counter this by adjusting the angle of the turbine blade as it is ready to go near
the ground and readjust the angle as the blade approaches the top of its spin cycle. By doing this,
the turbine ensures a constant load over the entire system, reducing unequal forces that result in
deterioration of the frame and gears. This process requires constant analysis of wind conditions
and would increase the maintenance load, but it could potentially improve the lifespan of the
turbine by not exposing the frame and gears to the long-term effects of wind shear. Another
benefit from individual blade control would be the extended range of wind speeds that the
turbine could function in. This is possible since the pitch of the blades can be adjusted, giving the
turbine the ability to either increase or decrease the power that the wind provides the generator.
If there is little wind, the turbine blades could be angled to provide maximum rotational energy.
Likewise, if there are very high winds, the turbine blades can be angled to provide less rotational
energy so as to still provide maximum electricity, but not have to initiate a shutdown to prevent
damage to the gears and generator (Phresher, 2010). These benefits can also be used to address
the problems associated with the wind shadowing effect, like lower wind speeds behind a wind
turbine, because some of the wind energy has been used to generate power. Since turbines can
function in lower wind speeds and adjust to abrupt gusts of wind better through constant
monitoring, the effects of wind shadowing are reduced and more power can be obtained, even
with a decrease in wind speed behind a turbine (Phresher, 2010).
In addition to individual blade control, modifying the electromechanical system can improve the
turbines ability to handle shocks and also provide an uninterruptible power supply. Such
modifications include using a linear rotary system for transferring rotational energy from the
turbine’s blades to the generator and the introduction of high-capacity capacitors instead of
batteries. Capacitors have an advantage over batteries as they respond better in colder
environments, hold a charge indefinitely, and do not need to be replaced or have chemicals
exchanged (Phresher, 2010). These modifications can extend the lifespan by multiple years and
improve the performance of wind turbines, especially as larger diameter wind turbines are being
created that are more prone to issues such as wind shear and the wind shadowing effect.
However, compared to blade coatings, these improvements all require costly hardware upgrades.
Engineers must carefully consider whether a system truly requires these upgrades and if it is
economically sound to implement them.

37
Conclusion:
These articles give great insight into many of the universal and climate-specific problems
plaguing wind turbines around the world and offer a variety of possible solutions. Solutions such
as blade coating, individual blade control, and a modified electromechanical system all address
the heart of the problem statement: to maximize electrical output in any wind conditions.
Extending this problem statement to include any environmental conditions and their associated
problems, such as ice accumulation, will make our team’s project more sustainable than
previously defined. In addition, the inclusion of long term reliability and power production along
with the improved short term electrical yield requirement is also considered as each modification
could affect the maintenance load on the turbine. It is essential to include these risks as some
solutions, such as electrical resistance heating, could result in not only a higher initial cost, but
also increased downtime if multiple repairs must be routinely made to the turbine. Should select
modifications be made to the turbine design, with regards to the climate that the turbine will be
located in, there is a strong possibility of not only an increase in short term electrical yield, but in
a long term improvement in reliability and efficiency as well.
Recommendations:
These articles provide many great ideas from which to address our problem statement. First, our
team should hone in on the ideal location that would have the least environmental and social
impact, while still remaining close to necessary electrical grids and within access of construction
crews. This can be determined by the reports made by my teammates whom were tasked with
researching this ideal location and climate. Next, a careful analysis of the above solutions must
be made to produce a turbine that not only provides the most electricity with the largest range of
operational wind speeds, as stated in the problem statement, but that is also reliable, safe,
durable, and cost-efficient. Some of the modifications may not be required nor pose a large
enough improvement to warrant the risk of a heavier maintenance load. As was done during the
reverse engineering project, evaluations of all of the possible solutions should be completed
systematically, in order to determine which most benefit our design. Finally, our team should
step back and analyze our resulting design from an economic, engineering, and environmental
standpoint to determine if the design could be further improved and ensure that all of its
components would stand-up to real world applications.

38
From: Evan Kearney
Problem Statement:
Introduction:
Wind power has been a part of society for thousands of years. From sailboats to windmills it has
made its mark on everyday life. As years pass, the potential of wind power continues to rise.
Wind turbines are being used in the present day to harvest energy from the wind. Engineers and
scientists have been continuously working to find the optimal design for the wind turbine. There
have been many theories and designs that have already been tried that have proved to be either
inefficient or were not the optimal design for a wind turbine. Wind power systems have the
potential to solve many of the world’s current problems because it is an efficient and quite
reliable natural source of energy. This is why the search for the optimal design of a wind turbine
is so important. The understanding of the previously attempted designs and theories of wind
turbines could provide a deeper understanding of the problem statement and make it easier for us
to develop our mechanism to maximize electrical output in any wind conditions.
Blades:
One of the most important parts of wind turbines are their blades. The blades are the part of the
mechanism that utilizes the natural wind and uses it to rotate the shaft of the generator converting
mechanical energy into electricity. The blades are the part of the wind turbine that can determine
exactly how much power the turbine can potentially produce. There are multiple factors that
need to be taken account of when analyzing the blades of a wind turbine, such as the blade
number, blade materials, and blade shape. In addition, with these physical characteristics, it is
also important that the cost of the blades remain low to keep the cost of construction reasonable.
In order to truly carry out the problem statement, it is important to understand the history of the
blades of wind turbines and, more specifically, what variations on these designs have been tried
before. It is helpful to learn from either the success or failure of these previous modifications.
The most important piece of information to know before talking about the blades of wind
turbines, is that there is a maximum amount of energy a turbine can extract from the wind.
Anything with an airfoil, defined as the shape of a wing, blade, or sail, can at most be about 60
percent efficient. Horizontal-Axis wind turbines operate around 35 to 40 percent efficiency.
(Benini & Toffolo, 2002) It is also important to know that if a site has very strong gusts of wind
it may not necessarily be the ideal site for wind turbines. “Strong gusts provide extremely high
levels of power, but it is not economically viable to build machines to be able to make the most
of the power peaks as their capacity would be wasted most of the time.” (Gurit, 2014, p.2)
Therefore the most ideal site is one with relatively steady winds. Therefore, the ideal design in
turn must be a turbine that is able to harvest the most from the lighter winds and still be able to
withstand stronger gusts of wind.

39
The number of blades was one of the first variables optimized when it came to wind turbines. In
1887, in Ohio, Professor Charles F. Brush built a 12 kW wind turbine to charge batteries in the
cellar of his mansion. His turbine had 144 rotor blades. A few years later, scientists and
engineers in Denmark discovered that fast rotating wind turbines with fewer rotor blades were
more efficient in generating electricity. Fewer rotor blades work better for multiple reasons. One
reason is because it decreases the amount of air disturbance for the following blade. In addition,
the fewer number of rotor blades allow the turbine to be built at a more reasonable height which
increases stability. Earlier it was mentioned that there is a maximum amount of energy that can
be harvested from wind. Because of this, the less blades there are, the more power each can
extract from the wind. On a side note, having a turbine with fewer blades would decrease the
costs of constructing the wind turbine. (Gurit, 2014, p.1)
An additional design factor that comes into question when talking about efficiency of wind
turbines is the shape of the blades. Wind-turbines have similar characteristics to airplane wings.
The specific design allows the blades to support the lift, drag and gravitational forces acting on it
from the wind. Another very important factor of the shape of the blades is the thickness of the
blades. The thickness is generally 10 – 15 % of its chord length and it tends to be thicker where
the end of the blade meets the mast where the bending forces are greatest. (Gurit, 2014, p.5)
Although it is more efficient to have thinner blades, cost comes into play when deciding which
thickness to use. It will cost more to make thinner blades because of the cost of reinforcement
inside, therefore there is a dilemma in the design process to find the optimal thickness of the
blades.
The material of the blades is a significant part in the design of any wind turbine. The material
must be made to certain specifications of the following characteristics: stiffness, density, and
longtime fatigue. The stiffness of the material must be able to support aerodynamic performance,
the density of the material has to be able to reduce the gravitational force, and the material has to
be dependent and reliable over a long period of time. Many different materials are used for
specific parts of the turbine. For example, carbon is used in blades and leading edges because it
has a very specific and ideal stiffness to it, while thermoplastic liquid resins are used for inner
spars of the blades in order to help extend the life span of the wind turbines. (Golfman, 2012,
p.56)
Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines:
When thinking of ways to improve the horizontal-axis wind turbines, a good question to ask is
why vertical-axis wind turbines are not the favored way to harvest wind power. Vertical-Axis
wind turbines are more aesthetically pleasing, and can be put anywhere because of their ability to
create energy by utilizing wind in any direction. It could be beneficial to find the weak points of
the vertical-axis wind turbines, so we know what parts of our horizontal-axis wind turbine design
to try to improve on.
Referring back to earlier in this paper, it was mentioned that wind turbines can only extract a
maximum amount of energy from wind. One of the biggest problems with vertical-axis wind
turbines is that it is less efficient than the horizontal-axis wind turbines. Up to ten percent less

40
efficiency. One of the main reasons this is the case is because the vertical-axis wind turbines are
constructed near ground-level. Unfortunately, there’s less power in ground-level wind. The ten
percent difference doesn’t sound like much, until other factors such as maintenance and lower
energy production are put in the mix. It is clear that vertical-axis wind turbines are second best
when it comes to generating electricity. (Hau, 2000, p. 46)
One factor that is unique with vertical-axis wind turbines is that it can take wind from any over
time. This special factor can actually lead to problems with the structure. Vertical-Axis wind
turbines work almost like an egg beater, with two vertically oriented curved blades spinning
around a vertical shaft. With this spinning comes centrifugal force. Inertia creates this apparent
force that draws a rotating body away from the center of rotation. This could lead to the
deformation of the blades and would require maintenance. The design of the wind turbine makes
it impossible to overcome these problems with centrifugal forces. That is not the only
maintenance related problem that the vertical-axis wind turbines encounter. Vertical-Axis wind
turbines are generally placed low to the ground. Many ground-level objects surrounding it such
as buildings, trees, etc. create turbulence. This turbulence can change directions of the wind and
speed the wind up and down. This makes vertical-axis wind turbines more prone to wear and
tear. To try and avoid this, engineers and manufacturers try to make the structures stronger by
adding more materials. Along with the new materials, more labor will be needed in the
construction of the vertical-axis wind, making the turbines very costly and significantly heavier.
(Hau, 2000, p. 48)
Conclusion:
The articles discussed are effective towards the project because they provided information about
what we need to focus on improving with our turbine design. We know what we can and cannot
affect when it comes to the design of the horizontal-wind turbine, and we know results from
previous designs that have failed and results from previous designs that have proved to be
efficient. I think these articles help make it clear the modifications we should try and take into
consideration when creating our mechanism. One possible modification could be changing the
shape of the blades. Many of the faulty concepts of the vertical-axis wind turbines should be
taken into consideration when creating our mechanism as points to improve on. These articles
have also made it clear that cost is a very important factor when it comes to modifying or adding
components to a wind turbine.
Recommendations:
Based off of these articles, I would make the following recommendations for our project:
I believe we should attempt to improve our horizontal-axis wind turbines in the specific areas
where the vertical-axis wind turbines tended to fail: maintenance and energy production. When it
comes to structure, vertical-axis wind turbine’s worth goes down because of its consistent
breakdowns. The demands for regular maintenance on these turbines add to the overall cost of
vertical-axis wind turbines as well. Therefore I believe our mechanism should be very secure and
sturdy so that no extra costs will be needed for maintenance purposes. As for energy production
purposes, I believe we should follow the theories and design of Benini’s article. This is the
reason why after reading of the optimization article of horizontal-axis wind turbines, I believe we

41
shouldn’t focus too much about the design of our horizontal-axis wind turbine as a whole as well
as the materials for the wind turbines. I believe if we feel we should be modifying any part of the
design, we should modify the blades shape or length, mainly because there seems like there
could possibly be room for improvement. The article about optimization, although it is hard to
understand because of my lack of expertise in the study field of wind power, seemed to have
very accurate and precise calculations and analyses. It is a very recently published article,
therefore it has very present-time optimal designs for wind turbines. The article about wind
turbines blade materials had incredible amounts of data to back up its recommendations towards
which materials to use, therefore I believe any ideas of modifying the material of the blades
should be left alone as well. By ruling out specific possibilities of design modifications, it will
allow us to find our optimal design quicker. It will keep us from wasting time trying to think of
ideas to modify almost optimal characteristics of wind turbines.

42
From: Lucy Lin
Date: 2/12/14
RE: Research Paper #1
Problem Statement:
Introduction:
For centuries, humankind has sought after safe and efficient methods to generate electricity.
Finally, an environmentally friendly solution was discovered. The revolutionary wind turbine
emerged as a powerhouse in the market for renewable energy. There are two main forms of wind
turbine, ones with a vertical axis and ones with a horizontal axis. Vertical axis wind turbine
designs incorporate a rotational axis that is perpendicular to the ground and is independent of
wind direction. Horizontal axis designs however, have their rotational axis parallel to the ground
and are capable of generating more electricity from the same given amount of wind. For this
reason, horizontal axis designs are preferred. When considering the optimal design for a
horizontal axis wind turbine that will be efficient and independent of the wind direction,
environmental concerns must be taken into account such as source of noise, aesthetic impact on
nearby landscapes and negative impact on avian population.
Source of Noise
Many concerns have arisen regarding the noise of wind turbines on nearby towns. The main
source of the commotion is the aerodynamic noise coming from the blades of the wind turbine
generator interacting with the wind. Those who live near wind farms often find it difficult to
sleep as they describe “swishing” and “thumping” sounds which generally causes more
annoyance than other types of sounds. The sound created by wind turbines has a low frequency
that induces harmful health effects such as headaches and nausea. When a questionnaire survey
was conducted, 20% of people responded that wind farms, even at the lowest noise level, causes
disturbed sleep at least once a month (Hanning, 2010). Although the most simple solution to
prevent the disturbance of noise would be to place wind farms further from residential dwellings
and into rural areas, that is not the most logical solution once the demand for renewable energy
using wind increases. Research has shown that a possible way to reduce the noise of wind
turbines includes changing the design of the trailing edge of the airfoil by adding serrated strips
of various sizes close to the top since most of the noises occur in that area (Inventus Holdings,
2013). This method helps reduce the sound without either compensating its efficiency or adding
to the total cost.
Aesthetic Impact on Landscapes
With wind turbines becoming increasingly popular, many are concerned with the aesthetic
effects such structures have on the landscape. Since there are less turbulent winds at higher

43
heights, the towers of these turbines are often visible from residential communities and cannot be
easily masked as other aerial features such as cell phone towers. In many cases, these wind
turbines are usually found on a desert or mountainside, which causes the implication that it is
“ruining” the scenic landscape. These negative associations with the aesthetics of wind turbines
could be mitigated once opponents consider the alternative to using wind turbines, which are
both unappealing and environmentally harming. Such alternatives may include extracting more
oil or building more power plants. Additionally, wind turbines will slowly integrate themselves
into the scenery and become familiar constructions very much the same way that bridges and
skyscrapers have become staple images of the modern world.
Impact on Bird Population
As wind turbines become increasingly abundant in large fields, the danger that it poses to the
avian population soars as well. There have been various bird collisions with the turbines that
results in death for the animals, especially certain species such as bald eagles, raptors and
waterfowls. Raptor interactions with wind farms occur in high numbers because they migrate at
night where there are less lights (DeLucas, p. 2). The location of these structures may interfere
with migrating routes which have the potential to stress the birds out and will result in death
elsewhere or impact their health. Habitat loss is also a potential problem as these birds lose their
homes or are forced to abandon them.
A specific type of bird, the bald eagle, is closely impacted due to the location of an expected
construction site in the western United States. To protect bald eagles from wind farms, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Services implemented the Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, which offers
legal protection for bald eagles (Division of Migratory Birds Management, pg. 3). To prevent
further mortality of bald eagles especially due to these wind structures, there are certain numbers
of eagle mortalities that are permitted each year in certain areas.
Although there are a number of deaths each year caused by wind turbines, studies have shown
that these are, in fact, not common occurrences. These studies, especially the one done by De
Lucas and his team, have concluded that wind turbines are not any more dangerous to birds as
other manmade structures such as power lines and highways for birds have demonstrated the
ability to be able to sense the presence of wind turbines (DeLucas, pg. 9).
It is inevitable that some avian will occur from these wind farms, but actions are being taken to
keep these numbers at a minimum. Such measures include looking closely at the location of
these farms and avoiding nesting areas and areas with large populations. Along with choosing a
key location, setting up lights at night will also minimize avian causalities. Radars can also be
used to detect approaching birds and allow the turbine to decrease its speed (American Bird
Conservancy, 2012).
Conclusions
These articles have increased my understanding on the environmental concerns associated with
wind turbines. In order to construct a successful horizontal axis wind turbine that will act
independent to the direction of the wind, the ethics of constructing it is an important aspect to

44
consider. These include the main three environmental concerns present: sound pollution,
aesthetic impact and collisions with the avian population. These articles help list the main
problems with these three concerns along with providing possible solutions that have been
implemented to address them. While trying to solve the issue of sound pollution, many scientists
have experimented with attaching different materials to the blades of the turbine along with
adding serrated strips in order to reduce the noise. The aesthetic features of wind turbines have
been a long controversial topic for many people as there are mixed opinions towards them. While
there are certainly individuals who regard the wind turbines as a form of art, there are also many
others who believe that it is disruptive to the typical landscape. However, although this concerns
still hold, there are very little things that can be done to address this issue. Wind turbines need to
be in an open space in order to receive the most wind. Possible solutions include using the
“lesser of two evils” technique by providing opponents with the arguments that without using
wind technology, alternative forms of attaining energy would be hurting the environment even
more. Finally, there is concern with the effect that wind farms have on avian population. Though
there are deaths present, experiments have shown that these numbers do not amount to any more
than other man-made structures. There are various ways to insure fewer casualties and such can
be done by changing the environment to avoid flight paths and lighting up the wind turbines at
night. All the articles provide possible solution methods and will allow the team to build a
horizontal axis wind turbine that is environmentally friendly and also addresses the concerns that
most people have.
Recommendations:
Based on the previous research and past experimentations, I highly recommend the following in
order to build a successful wind turbine that will satisfy the three primary concerns of the public:
One of the primary goals of the new horizontal axis wind turbine is to make sure the new design
causes the least disturbance to the population. Our potential wind turbines will include serrated
strips of varying sizes to attach on the trailing edge of the blades in order to minimize the sound
produced. These strips would create vortices that would cancel each other out, which would
eliminate the amount of sound produced (Inventus Holdings, 2013). Originally, the strips were of
the same size but after various experiments, it was discovered that serrated strips of varying sizes
work better without sacrificing the productivity of the structure (Inventus Holdings, 2013). We
would also feature a different straight trailing edge instead of one at an angle. Our wind turbine
would be located in areas where there are no residential communities. It would most likely be on
land that has been used before for prior construction so that it would not give off the notion that
human actions for technology are harming the environment. Additionally, steps will be taken to
eliminate avian casualties by installing bright lights that will appear only at night and will be
visible to the birds. Areas of flight paths or heavily populated avian nesting spots are to be
avoided. I recommend that our team look more into the serrated strips and whether adding in
other materials such as rubber along with the strips will produce even less sound that just the
strips itself.

45
From: Maxwell Brown
Date: February 12, 2014
Problem Statement:
Introduction:
The world is currently dependent on non-renewable resources for energy. These resources are
harmful to the environment and studies have reconfirmed this. Non-renewable resources are
being depleted rapidly and a new, cleaner resource must be utilized. Researchers have looked
into multiple types of renewable resources determined wind energy to be one of the most
promising. It is abundant and easily harnessed and if further developed, it can become even
more effective. Wind turbines are either classified as horizontal axis or vertical axis. Each has
its pros and cons but a functioning combination of the two would be most desirable. This paper
attempts to determine the optimal locations for these newly developed turbines whether they are
onshore or offshore as well as if they would be more effective as stand-alone systems or grouped
into wind farms. This paper also discusses how the turbines should be designed to be site
specific. This is more expensive than mass-producing turbines but the potential increase in
electricity output could be worth the extra cost.
Grid-Connected vs. Stand-Alone Energy Systems:
Wind turbines can be placed in wind farms or as a stand-alone system. Both forms of placement
are effective and can be placed either onshore or offshore (Han, Mol, Lu, & Zhang, 2009, p. 1).
A wind farm is a group of wind turbines placed in the same location with the purpose of
developing a large amount of electricity. Wind farms are connected to the power grid, which is
connected to a distribution plant that distributes the electricity to the local area. If there is a
surplus of electricity the extra power simply returns back to the power grid. This process
essentially turns the power grid into a battery. The extra energy is stored and can be used when
needed. In order for the power grid to produce an effective amount of electricity, large amounts
of wind energy must be harvested. This requires a large amount of land to host the turbines
(Kaundinya, Balachandra, & Ravindranath, 2009, p. 1-2).
Stand-alone wind turbines can simply be described as turbine that stands alone. A stand-alone
wind turbine is not connected to the power grid and is effective in remote locations. Because
they are effective in remote locations, they solely concentrate on serving the energy needs of one
group of people, which is simpler than serving the needs of the millions of people connected to a
power grid. Stand-alone turbines take up significantly less area than wind farms and cost
substantially less to operate. A downside to a stand-alone wind turbine is that surplus energy
cannot be incorporated back into the grid and must either be wasteed or stored in batteries, which

46
can be both expensive and inefficient (Kaundinya, Balachandra, & Ravindranath, 2009, p. 1-3).
A recent study conducted by Kaundinya and his coauthors determined that there has been both
success and failure with grid-connected systems and stand-alone systems. The development of
either system is location dependent and thus one approach is not entirely better than the other.
The location of the wind turbine must be taken into consideration before selecting which method
would be most effective.
Onshore Wind Energy:
Wind energy began to be harvested onshore centuries ago in order to pump water and grind
wheat. Today it has evolved and is now used to generate electricity. China is a country that has
an abundant amount of onshore wind power available and the country has certainly taken
advantage of it. A journal article written by Han and his coauthors examines a specific region in
China, Mongolia, and its development of onshore wind turbines. Mongolia is considered to be an
ideal location for the development of wind technology because of its high altitude, open terrain,
and monsoon like windy climate.
The development of onshore wind power in Mongolia began in the 1970’s. The first turbines
created were stand-alone turbines and two decades later the first gird connected wind farm was
developed. Since then, wind technology development increased rapidly and by 2007, Mongolia
had 1,856 wind turbines. Although there has been a great increase in the development of
onshore wind turbines, the wind farms in Mongolia are not all that profitable. Reasons for this
are that it is expensive to transport the wind turbines to the build site. Roads, railways, and water
are required to get the turbine parts from where they are manufactured to the site where it is
being constructed. Also, it is not economical or even feasible to transport the electricity from a
remote location (where the turbines are located) to the power grid. Thus, when developing a
turbine an ideal location is not only determined by high wind speeds and climate. It is also
heavily determined by the convenience of reaching the location and its proximity to the power
grid (Han, Mol, Lu, & Zhang, 2009, p. 1-3).
Aside from the construction of the turbine, the transportation of its parts, and the distribution of
the electricity it generates, it is important to consider how it effects the environment it is placed
in and the population of the people and animals that live there. Wind energy is relatively clean
however; the construction of the turbine is usually not an environmentally friendly process so
this must be considered when picking a location. Wind farms must be placed in locations that
avoid the paths of migrating birds and must not negatively impact the local species that live
there. Lastly, developers must deal with the people who live near the turbines. Some people
find them aesthetically unpleasing and claim that they make noise. This article makes it clear
that developers must take multiple variables into consideration when developing onshore wind
turbines (Han, Mol, Lu, & Zhang, 2009, p. 9).
Offshore Wind Energy:
A new trend in wind technology development is offshore wind turbines. Offshore wind turbines
are placed in the water not to far off the coast of the location it is powering. A recent study

47
written by Dvorak and his coauthors look at the potential of offshore turbines in California.
There are many more limitations and variables when designing an offshore turbine. The turbines
are more expensive to build and are currently restricted to shallow waters. Once the turbines are
up and running, it is substantially more expensive to transport the electricity from the turbine
under water to a location onshore where it can be utilized. Lastly, maintenance costs are more
expensive due to the turbines constant interaction with the sea. Simply put, offshore wind
turbines are more expensive. However, the question is whether or not the increased price tag on
the turbines is worth the extra energy they generate. Offshore turbines on average produce more
electricity than onshore ones. This is due to the faster moving air moving over the water.
Dvorak states, “Unlike most of California’s land based wind farms which peak at night, the
offshore wind near Cape Mendocino are consistently fast throughout the day and night through
all seasons.” (Dvorak, Archer, & Jacobson, 2010). Based on the previous statement, offshore
winds are more predictable. Predictability is one of the main issues with wind energy and the
fact that there is consistency over water makes offshore wind energy very desirable. Another
advantage to offshore wind turbines is that the transportation of the parts is not restricted to the
small amount of room available on rail and truck and large parts can be moved on ships (Dvorak,
Archer, & Jacobson, 2010).
There are four types of offshore wind turbines that are being developed: gravity, monopole,
multi-leg, and floating. Gravity turbines can be placed in the shallowest of waters, monopole can
be placed slightly deeper, and multi leg can be placed in deep waters. Floating turbines are still
in development but soon they will permit turbines to be placed in the deepest of waters. The type
of turbine developed will have to depend on the depth of the water. All previous types are
effective when placed in the proper location (Dvorak, Archer, & Jacobson, 2010).
Some people find the offshore turbines ascetically unpleasing and that they ruin the view of the
ocean and their concerns must be taken into consideration. Also, there is potential harm to sea
life when these turbines are developed as well as birds that might cross the turbines path.
Offshore wind turbines have a huge potential to be effective if more research is done and more
technology is developed.
Site Specific Development:
Fuglsang and his coauthor present a method for site-specific design of wind turbines. The
purpose of this study was to use an algorithm to optimize a turbine for a specific location. The
idea is that if turbines are designed to be location specific, they will operate more efficiently.
They produced an algorithm to insert certain features of a specific site and it would in return
produce characteristics of a specific turbine that could reduce the costs of producing energy
(Fuglsang & Thomsen, 2001).
The study also determined that when both onshore and offshore wind turbines are optimized for
a specific location, “…offshore wind farms showed a potential increase in energy production of
28% for the offshore wind farm, but also significant increases in most fatigue loads and in cost
energy” (Fuglsang & Thomsen, 2001). Offshore farms produced more energy but the energy
produced cost more. This finding is also significant because it makes clear the potential of

48
offshore wind turbines, which can be further increased if research is done to reduce initial costs.
Conclusion:
Based off the articles I have read I conclude that they provide my team with the necessary
information to select an appropriate location for the turbine we are developing. The location we
select will allow it to operate at maximum efficiency and minimal cost. One article in particular
provided information about an algorithm that can be used to determine the characteristics for a
turbine based on the specific site that its going to be developed in. Overall, it became clear that
offshore wind technology has more potential to produce large amounts of electricity compared to
onshore turbines. By scouting out effective areas offshore, such as off the coast of California
and locations on the east coast, the turbine we are developing can operate most efficiently. The
articles also give insight to what locations don’t work for the development of wind technology
and that there are a variety of factors that must be taken into account when selecting a location
including the environment, population, proximity to the power grid, and proximity to rail or
highways to transport the turbines parts for construction.
Recommendations:
Based on reading these articles, I would make the following recommendations for our project:
Locations where the company wants to develop our groups newly developed turbine must be
scouted and researched. This must be done in order to find a site that would enable our turbine
to operate most efficiently and at a minimal cost. The sites where these turbines are going to be
placed must meet a certain criteria. The turbine must be in a location that does not negatively
affect wildlife or human population. The turbine must somehow be connected to the power grid
to allow for the effective usage of energy. The location must have high wind speeds and an ideal
wind turbine climate. Lastly, locations must have some proximity to rail or highway if it is
onshore. If offshore, it must be easily accessible by boat. Based on the research I have done, I
would recommend our group to look for an offshore location for our newly developed turbine.
Offshore wind turbines have been proven to produce more energy, on average, than onshore
turbines. I believe the turbine we develop will operate at its maximum potential in an offshore
location. Another benefit of offshore turbines is that they are far enough from the public and
therefore don’t interfere as much as onshore turbines. They also don’t take up landmass. The
team also now knows what locations to avoid when selecting a site for our turbine. This ensures
that our team’s hard work does not go to waste and that our turbine is placed in a location that it
can be most effective. Overall, I would recommend that the team pursue a location that is
offshore and meets the above criteria.

49
To: Professor Fellows, WTSN 104, Section 57
From: Stephen Valvo
Date: 2/12/14
Problem Statement:
Introduction:
Wind energy has recently become a quickly growing field, and wind turbines have been
increasing in efficiency every year. However, horizontal axis wind turbines do not always face in
the direction of the wind. In addition, the big blades of the turbines often result in several avian
casualties each year, and many people do not support these wind turbines near populated areas
because they are not aesthetically appealing. There are many approaches that can be taken to
improve these wind turbines. One of the areas that can be improved upon is the materials of the
wind turbine. This paper will discuss the current materials that horizontal axis wind turbines are
using, and the alternatives that can increase the durability, reliability, and decrease the cost of the
turbines. The logistics of transporting these materials will also be discussed in this paper.
Current Wind Turbines:
Horizontal Axis wind turbines have 3 main parts: the nacelle, the rotor, and the tower. Each of
these parts can be broken down into several other components, for example the blades are a
component of the rotor. Since there are different parts of a wind turbine, the parts are sometimes
made in different sized so they can output a certain amount of MW (Mega Watts). These wind
turbines all have their specific requirements for each of their respective parts, both in size and
material. Changing the materials that wind turbines are made out of is one way to increase
efficiency and overall electrical output.
A typical wind turbine today contains about 89.1% steel, 5.8% fiberglass, 1.6% copper, 1.3%
concrete, 1.1% adhesives, 0.8% aluminum, and 0.4% core materials, such as foam, plastic, and
wood (U.S. 7). However, with new technology these percentages will likely change, and new
materials will be integrated into wind turbines.
The Tower:
There are some basic requirements that the tower of the wind turbines must meet. First and
foremost, the towers must be strong and must be able to hold the weight of the blades and the
nacelle. The nacelle accounts for about 25-40% of the weight of the turbine, and the nacelle
accounts for most of the energy conversion (U.S. 10). So, it is very important for the tower to be
able to support the nacelle, which is very heavy. In addition, the towers must be able to forces
from the wind, so therefore they must be stiff and strong (Hogg, 3). Most of the turbines today
are on-shore, so it does not really matter if they are light or not, however if a turbine could be

50
made from lighter materials it would reduce the cost of production and the cost of transportation,
especially when transporting the turbines off-shore. Currently, the towers are made of mostly
steel. However, steel is very heavy, and also can result in issues with respect to corrosion.
However, steel is used because it is very strong and cheap to produce. One material that can be
used as an alternative to steel in the towers of wind turbines is concrete. (Hogg, 6) If a hybrid
steel is used (Steel & concrete), the cost of production will still be cheap, the tower will still be
strong, however corrosion will be less of an issue, thus resulting in a longer lasting wind turbine.
Using concrete in conjunction with steel does not solve the weight issue, however. To solve this
issue, carbon fiber could be introduced to the towers, because carbon fiber is strong, yet light in
weight and cheap to produce. (Hogg, 6).
Rotors:
The most important part of the rotor is the blades. The blades must be aerodynamic so they can
generate enough torque to run the generators. While the blade design is very important, the
materials that are used in the blades are also very important. The blades of the wind turbine must
be stiff enough so they do not hit the towers when the wind is strong, but they must also be light
so they can rotate in lower wind speeds (Hogg, 10). The material that is used for the blades of the
wind turbines must be light, but also stiff. As stated by Professor Hogg, “Reducing the weight of
the blades also will directly reduce the loads on the tower and foundations” (13). So, materials
that have a high stiffness and low density will be the best choices, and based on these
requirements composites should be used.
Transportation of Parts:
While it is important to consider the materials that are selected for wind turbines, the
transportation of the parts from the manufacturing plants to the location of the turbines must also
be considered. One of the major logistical issues with the transportation of wind turbines is the
short-term availability of equipment large enough to transport such large parts, and the lack of
experienced personnel to transport, construct, and operate this equipment (U.S. 13). The
components of wind turbines are so difficult to transport because they are so large and heavy, so
they require special handling. Therefore, the cost of transportation is very expensive, which is a
huge obstacle. This cost can be even larger if wind turbines are being erected off-shore, because
the components of the turbines not only have to cross land, but they have to cross large bodies of
water, where weight becomes a major issue. There are two solutions that are possible to solve
this huge obstacle of transportation. First, the parts of the wind turbines can be made from lighter
materials, as discussed earlier. Second, the parts of the turbines can be manufactured in sections.
This way the parts will not require such special equipment to transport them, and they will be
easier for cranes to handle when erecting the wind turbines.
A New Goal:
One of the goals stated in the U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey report is
for 20% of the energy supplied in the U.S. to be supplied from wind energy. This is a goal that
our team can meet, and even surpass with a newly designed turbine. However, some there are
some basic requirements that are necessary to meet this goal, and there are areas of wind turbines

51
that can be improved upon to help reach the goal. The average life span of a wind turbine is 20 to
30 years (U.S. 11). If new materials are implemented in wind turbines, and maintenance utilities
are improved, the life span of wind turbines can be increased.

52
From: Ryan Yetter
Date: 2/19/14
Problem Statement:
Introduction:
For many years, scientist and engineers have attempted to create a new and improved wind
turbine that would be able to maximize electrical output in a multitude of varying wind
conditions. A large variety of wind turbines have been developed over the years in order to
combat this problem of being able to adjust efficiently to varying wind speeds and directions. A
key to making wind turbines efficient is their geographical placement, and how the placement of
wind turbines is key to their output and efficiency. Many wind farm locations are based on years
of meteorological data to find key efficient cost effective locations. Many failures in these
designs are their inability to be cost effective or are dangerous to both people nearby and
wildlife. In addition, another major problem of wind turbines is the noise caused by the fan
blade, and how this causes disturbances to those living nearby the wind turbines farms. Our goal
is to produce an efficient, cheap, reliable and safe wind turbine that can maximize its electrical
output.
Wind Power Meteorology:
Wind Power Meteorology is a term that refers to meteorology and how it influences wind
turbines, as well as how wind turbines influence meteorology. The use of Wind Power
Meteorology is also important in the prediction of power output and efficiency of wind turbines
based on the weather. These short term power output predictions in addition to the use of
meteorological data in order to find efficient locations for wind turbines, furthermore making the
wind turbines cost efficient.
The use of Wind Power Meteorology is key in figuring out the wind climatology of a specific
location. In order to do this meteorologists need to input specific key information about the
region. These include; the position and dimensions for sheltering obstacles, roughness of the
terrain, as well as height contour lines for mountainous terrain (Petersen, Mortense, Landberg,
Hojstrup & Frank p. 9). With these inputs meteorologists can receive the wind climatology of
specific regions, and use this information in order to determine efficient cost effective locations
for wind turbines. The wind climatological description and classification of a particular location
is not simple to determine, however. Many different types of wind statistics are considered for a
description of wind climates and vary with local or regional progressions. However accurate
these wind climatology models are, they are only good for a short period of time, this is because
variability is a basic feature due to the fact that climate and the weather changes from year to
year and also between consecutive decades. In some studies it has been shown that an analysis of

53
the expected power output for a 45-m high wind turbine over a 22-year period is such that the
variation, between the years, in power corresponds to an average standard deviation of 13%
(Peterson, p.12). Even with these accurate statics on wind turbines and the correlations between
efficiency and wind patterns we can still see the need for more efficient wind turbines in these
ever changing climates. Other limitations of Wind Turbine Meteorology are based upon the
mathematical equations used to find wind climatology are fairly new and are still being reworked
in order to get the most accurate data.
There are many takeaways from the research of Erik Peterson and his colleagues. The first is
combining the use of meteorology and wind turbines creates a way for determine efficient
locations for wind turbines. Also, meteorology and its uses to predict power outputs from wind
turbines can be useful in fulfilling supply and demand needs for consumers and the power they
need. However, we can also see how unpredictable the climate can be and how much it can vary
from year to year creating headaches for planning of wind turbine locations in the future. Our
team will attempt to use this knowledge in the future to help plan locations for new wind turbines
as well as being able to predict whether or not a wind turbine will be cost efficient.
Estimation of Wind Turbine Power Generation
New advancements in wind turbine technology and finding areas of rich wind resources are
aiding the growth of wind power. Even with these new advancements in the wind turbine
industries, when wind turbines are spread over large areas of land such as wind farms then there
is an inherent variation of wind power produced by any singular wind turbine. These variations
in the power generated are due to variations in wind speed and direction. Measured wind data is
seldom identical to that seen at the generator for a variety of reasons, including the expense of
obtaining and maintaining that data as well as topographical constraints (Li, Wunsch, O'Hair, &
Giesselmann, 2001).
In this study, the researches look at the Fort Davis wind farm and use the twelve turbines located
there as well as two meteorological towers. The first study was the influence of wind velocity on
turbine power generation. With this study they were able to find the proper performance curve
that ended up to closely resembling that of manufactures specifications. At wind speeds between
30 and 40 mph, the wind turbines output was at 500 KW on the optimal output curve which is
also level and is at its maximum value. The current generated is proportional to the generator
shaft torque, this is however limited by controlling the torque produced by the turbine blades.
This is accomplished by using ailerons at the tip of the blades to reduce the blade lift (Li, 2001).
Another influence on wind turbine power generation is wind direction; however, the researches
came to the conclusion that wind direction has a minimal effect on the power generated because
each turbine is designed to face into the wind while operating. The bigger concern for creating an
efficient wind turbine based on wind direction is varying wind directions, and how it becomes
hard for turbines to adjust to these changing wind conditions (Li, 2001).
Due to the patterns and data found at Fort Davis wind farm we can now use this information to
predict wind farm power outputs. This also helps wind farm networks in two ways. First, the
scheme can greatly reduce the size and complexity of the neural network of wind farms. Second,
the operation of a wind farm usually requires some of the wind turbines to be off-line. These new

54
schemes of a neural network for each turbine will not be influenced by the turbines that are off-
line. Third, this approach scales better for large wind farms making it more economically
feasible for future use (Li, 2001).
Conclusion
The conclusion I have made from these reports and how they affect our project is that they have
provided me with valuable information that has increased my understanding and knowledge, and
will also help my overall teams understanding of how to determine wind turbine locations based
on geography and meteorology. This will help form a solution that uses these methods in
forming our plan for a more efficient wind turbine. These articles also show potential
weaknesses in the designs and locations of wind turbines based on average wind speeds and
directions. Wind turbines have the potential to become very economically feasible as well and
efficient by using the methods described in these reports.
Recommendations
Based on the reports I have read, I would make the following recommendations for our project:
We should further look into the use of the provided wind farm power output projections as we
move forward as a way to understand if our wind turbine will be efficient, as well as cost
effective. We should also look into the location of the wind turbine because the location of the
wind turbine greatly affects the power output of the wind turbine and the efficiency. Finally, I
would recommend for our team to further look into research on the correlation between
geography and wind turbine efficiency.

55
Appendix G: Research Paper 2
From: Adam Suda
Date: 4/11/14
Problem Statement:
Alternative Solution:
Our mechanism will feature a sensor that will determine the position of the wind, and will then
send electronic signals to a motor that will, through a series of gears, turn the nacelle of the wind
turbine to face the wind.
Question:
How powerful will the motor need to be to turn the nacelle?
Answer:
The motor, or motors needed to turn the nacelle and blade assembly will have varying size
depending on how large the turbine will be. One of the most common wind turbines in use
currently is the GE 1.5 megawatt model (GE, 2009). For this model the nacelle which houses the
gearbox and the turbine weighs approximately 56 tons, with the attached blade assembly
weighting 36 tons. Our motors will have to be able to turn this huge, near 92 ton mass (Givens,
2002). The easiest way to do this is have the upper assembly on a series of high load bearings so
as to reduce friction and to have our motors go through a gearbox to increase torque. While this
will decrease the speed at which the assembly will move it will result in lower energy needs and
smaller motors being used. Regarding how strong these motors will need to be, it will largely
depend on how many are installed. For an even load across the whole tower and on the gear
system four seems to be the industry standard, with the motors being inside the nacelle and
acting as pinions against a large gear that sits atop the tower. According to industry standards the
largest wind turbines demand torque approaching 200,000 newton-meters, before gearboxes are
even added to the equation (Rusca, 2010). This seems to vary largely depending on how large the
turbine is. Thus while it would preferably have a one-size-fits all evaluation for the power
needed to rotate the turbine, it would be more cost efficient to have different motors for different
sized turbines.
Question:
What system of gears will be needed for the system to operate?

56
Answer:
The most common system for yaw drives to operate is to have a circular gear with teeth facing
inwards. The yaw drives act as pinions and rotate the top of the tower, with the gear being bolted
and held in place to the tower. The nacelle itself rests on a series of high load bearings so that it
can rotate smoothly, with these bearings reducing friction and torque required to rotate. The
drive yaw also go through a series of gears that reduce the rate of rotation, but increase torque
produced so as to move the massive load above it. This will result in slow response but requires
less power, and fewer resources spent on motors and gears.
Question:
Which varieties of wind detection sensors would be optimal, and how many sensors are needed
to be able to respond properly to wind changes?
Answer:
The main variety of wind measurement instrument needed would be an electronic wind vane,
which responds to wind changes and sends an electronic signal or data to an onboard control
system(Schienitzki, Strobl, Gutierrez & Gräber, 2014). For our purposes this seems to be
adequate, but for the purposes of recording conditions at the wind turbines it would likely be
wise to have an anemometer which would record the speed of the wind to determine if the site
has consistent wind speeds, and if perhaps the wind turbine is not well placed. Likewise,
temperature, air pressure and humidity all play a role in how much energy is produced by a given
turbine, so sensors to record this data may be very worthwhile if evaluating the worth of a
particular site. Another worthwhile instrument would be a barometer to measure air pressure so
that in case of low pressure which could indicate an incoming storm the turbine could
automatically turn off to protect itself from high winds. However for our purposes of only
determining where the wind is coming from just a wind vane would be sufficient.

57
From: Brandon Okraszewski
Date: March 12th
, 2014
Re: Research Paper #2 – Edit for Final
Problem Statement:
The Fan Mechanism is a device that resembles a helicopters tail and it will be attached to the
upper portion of a wind turbine. The device will utilize a fan (rotor) at the end of the tail to vary
its position.
Question:
How does the tail rotor of a helicopter operate (Also on what axis)?
Answer:
In most helicopter designs, a single rotor mounted on top of the helicopter provides upward
thrust, with the force of wind pushing down on the ground to allow the vehicle to elevate.
Orientation of this rotor determines altitude and position; angled forward will allow for
propulsion whereas a level rotor will allow the helicopter to elevate. This main rotor, however,
produces torque, causing the copter to rotate uncontrollably with the rotation of the rotor.
One of the first documented solutions to this problem was by Wilheim von Achenbach in 1874.
The German inventor proposed a tail rotor to act against the rotation. The tail rotor generates a
sideways thrust that compensates for torque produced by the main rotor (Gordon p. 4). A rotor is
placed at the end of the tail perpendicular to the main rotor, allowing for the counteraction. The
rotor uses three to five percent of the main rotor power during normal flight, and up to twenty
percent during extreme conditions (Gordon p. 226).
As a negative consequence to the addition of a tail rotor, helicopters become a minor
inconvenience to civilians. While the main rotor generates lower frequencies, the tail rotor
generates higher, more discernible frequencies that are more noticeable to the human ear
(Gordon p. 315).
The proposed solution of a fan mechanism is used to produce, rather than act against, torque that
will allow wind turbines to rotate along a horizontal axis. Understanding the workings of a tail
rotor for a helicopter allows for understanding of energy and mechanical outputs of a tail rotor
built with the mechanism of a wind turbine.
Application:

58
Tail rotor follows same mechanics as helicopter tail rotors in which the rotor and tail are
positioned perpendicular to the main fan and tower. A motor in rotor will allow the wind turbine
to spin on command when wind patterns are detected by sensors mounted on the mechanism.
The rotor will then generate torque perpendicular to the fan to allow the turbine to shift position.
Cases in which energy is unavailable to power the motor of the rotor, wind that does not go to
the main fan directly will instead move through rotor, thereby moving the tower on a horizontal
axis without use of a motor.
Question:
What materials are currently used in helicopters tail rotor?
Answer:
Helicopter blades are typically made of composite materials to be light enough to allow the
thrust of the main rotor to elevate the vehicle, yet durable enough to withstand the forces of
rotation of the rotor. A study determined composite graphite/epoxy to have lowest weight, and
composite boron/epoxy to be most compact (Murugan p. 11); different compositions will yield
different configurations, each with varying benefits.
Helicopters with main rotors that rotate on a fixed axis tend to vibrate, thereby decreasing control
capabilities. Depending on materials used to construct the blades, the rotor can become deformed
and lose aerodynamic capabilities. Straub and King (1996) suggest the use of smart materials,
materials that change shape under the influence of electrical, thermal or magnetic stimulation, to
adapt to different conditions. Blades of the rotors that alternate shapes allow for less deformation
by changing in response to a change in environment.
Application:
In relation to the solution, determination of the proper materials will allow for a stronger, more
effective tail rotor. Ability to manipulate the blades of the tail rotor lowers the frequency of
deformation and thus lowers the necessity for maintenance. Since a tail rotor on a wind turbine
requires strength rather than low weight, material of the rotor should be a composite similar to
boron/epoxy. The tail rotor of a wind turbine will not need to be significantly aerodynamic; as a
result, a composite blade should be used rather than a smart material blade. Accommodations for
change in environment will be relatively unnecessary in the case of a wind turbine.
Question:
What type of braking system would be most effective?
Answer:
Frictional braking uses frictional surfaces to slow and stop an object. The first brake lining using
frictional braking was introduced by Henry Ford in 1897 (Blau p. 9). Initially, cast iron on steel
and woven fibers of asbestos with brass wires were used as brakes in railroad cars and early

59
automobiles respectively. Over time, carbon fibers were suggested and are now used in
automotive brakes. This form of braking is occasionally unreliable, requiring replacement and
maintenance as the friction material is worn down by continuous use.
In electromagnets, a piece of metal is placed inside a coil of conductive wire. Applying a current
to this system and closing the circuit will cause the metal to become magnetized with poles
corresponding to the flow of the applied current. The Magnetorheological suspension (MRS)
braking system utilizes an electromagnet placed between two MRS disks (Bica 2003).
Essentially, once a current is applied, the electromagnet attracts the two disks, locking the system
and preventing motion. Using this form of braking poses difficulty in that a power source is
constantly required during times when the fan is locked in place.
Determination of which braking system to use will allow for a reliable rotation system. Between
frictional braking and electromagnetic braking, the latter is more effective in that it requires less
maintenance and prevents stronger movement than frictional braking. As a result, the fan tail
mechanism must use electromagnetic braking as the most effective system to prevent movement
after the mechanism is in an optimal position.
Application:
Braking system must be applied to the frictionless rotating piece to allow the mechanism to
orient the fan directly in the path of oncoming wind. Without the brake, the fan will continue to
rotate uncontrolled. Using a ball bearing [Figure 3], the turbine will rotate with little friction,
creating the problem of relatively continuous rotation. With the use of an electromagnetic brake,
a battery must be stored within the mechanism to allow for braking when lacking power.

60
From: Brian Parsons
Date: 3/30/14
Re: Research Paper #2 – Edited
Problem Statement:
Our team’s solution is a downwind turbine rotation mechanism. Downwind turbines offer many
benefits over the traditional upwind turbine designs. These benefits make downwind turbines
more suitable for harvesting wind energy than upwind turbines under unique geographic and
atmospheric conditions. Downwind turbine designs take advantage of drag from the wind to
rotate into the ideal position automatically without the any need of any additional energy or
components.
Question:
How would the energy generated be affected by having a turbine on a frictionless rotation system
compared to other rotation systems?
Answer:
This is a complicated question as there are many factors to consider. If compared to the most
common alternative system, the upwind motorized active yaw drive rotation mechanism, the
energy yield is nearly identical on flat geography. This is due to the energy being spent to
operate the sensors, computers, and motors being offset by the energy lost to tower shadow in the
downwind turbine design. But if the geographical location is changed to an uphill or
mountainous location, the downwind turbine design quickly becomes favorable over the upwind
turbine design. This is due to the angle of incidence the wind has with the blades of the turbine in
a mountainous location (Manwell et al., 2002).
Application:
Our team is designing a mechanism to rotate a horizontal axis wind turbine. If all of the same
results (or more) of a traditional upwind motorized active yaw drive rotation mechanism can be
achieved by using a downwind free yaw drive rotation mechanism that requires less components
than alternative designs, it is obviously to our team’s benefit. Not only will energy output be
either on par or increased with a downwind design, but stability in destructive weather is
improved.
Question:

61
What sort of turbulence problems does a downwind turbine face compared to an upwind turbine?
Answer:
By locating the blades and rotor downwind instead of upwind, the turbine is subjected to wake
from the turbulence of wind flowing around the nacelle, known as tower shadow. Tower shadow
can result in uneven wind loads on the blades, creating fatigue over time. The effects of tower
shadow can be minimized by utilizing larger diameter blades and by making the nacelle more
aerodynamic and less obstructive to wind flow (Matsunobu et al., 2009). However, both upwind
and downwind turbines face wind shadow, characterized by fast and erratic gusts of wind to
different points on the turbine. This can also cause fatigue over time. Downwind turbines are
better equipped to deal with wind shadow than upwind designs because the free yaw drive
rotation system allows the turbine to simply rotate with oncoming gusts of wind and cushion
their blow than try to adapt after the fact using an array of sensors, computers, and motors
(Manwell et al., 2002).
Application
Our team’s design would have to take into account the associated atmospheric advantages and
disadvantages of using a downwind turbine system compared to an upwind turbine system.
Should a downwind turbine design be selected, our team’s design should make every effort to
minimize tower shadow and capitalize on the benefits of increased stability and less components.
Question:
How does the reliability of a downwind turbine compare to that of an upwind turbine?
Answer:
There are advantages and disadvantages of using a downwind system with regards to reliability.
The advantage of using such a system is it lacks the possible maintenance required for
components that an upwind system would have such as sensors, motors, computers, and
batteries. In addition, a downwind system manages wind shadow more effectively than an
upwind design. Wind shadow would result in strong, erratic wind gusts that could lead to fatigue
of the rotor and blades over a long time period (Manwell et al., 2002). However, the
disadvantage of a downwind system would be the long term effects of tower shadow. Similar to
wind shadow, tower shadow can also lead to fatigue of the rotors and blades, resulting in more
maintenance. However, with improved designs, tower shadow can be reduced for downwind
turbines (Matsunobu et al., 2009).
Application:
Our team’s design must take into account the overall reliability of using a downwind system
compared to an upwind system. The upwind system requires more components that could lead to
maintenance issues while the downwind system has the unique problem of turbine wake. Our
team must weigh both of these reliability factors when determining a solution.

62
To: Professor Neuberger, WTSN104, Section 57
From: Evan Kearney
Date: 3/12/14
Re: Research Paper #2 - Part 1
Problem Statement:
Alternative Solutions:
Create a wind turbine that rotates with the help of a sail/tail vane and a frictionless surface.
Question:
What type of materials should be used for the design components?
Answer:
The design components being focused on in this question are the locking device “pegs”, the
“low-friction/frictionless” surface, and the tail vane. For the locking device pegs, a material that
is a strong and resistant metal is desired. For the low-friction/frictionless surface, a material that
is strong enough to support the top of the wind turbine, but smooth enough to rotate the top
easily is desired. For the tail vane, a material that is durable with a long lifetime is desired.
For the locking device pegs, the material that may be best suited for the design is
titanium/titanium alloys. The locking device pegs need to be strong. They need to be able to stop
the top of the wind turbine from rotating without causing any damage to the pegs themselves or
causing any stress to the structure as a whole. Titanium is a transition metal with low density and
high strength. It can be alloyed with other metals such as iron to produce strong light-weight
alloys for many applications. Pure titanium has an ultimate tensile strength of about 434 MPa,
and alloys can reach a tensile strength of over 1400 MPa. This strong metal is guaranteed to
efficiently perform its intended job for the locking device. (“Titanium (Ti),” 2014)
For the low-friction/frictionless surface, the materials that may be best suited for the design are
mechanically strong hydrogels with ultra-low frictional coefficients. The materials for this part
of the design must be very strong. Studies have previously shown that “the presence of
polyelectrolyte brushes on a hydrogel surface can effectively reduce sliding friction coefficients
to a value around 10-4
.”(Kaneko, Tada, Kurokawa, Gong, & Osada, 2005) The problem with that
technique is that the conventional hydrogels are not strong enough to be used in any type of
strength bearing situation. Therefore very strong hydrogels are needed for this task. A new gel
that contains 60-90 percent water shows fracture strengths as high as 9 MPa and a frictional
coefficient as low as 10-5
. With some rearranging in the mechanism, this “DN” Gel may be the
answer for the low-friction/frictionless surface. (Kaneko et al., 2005)

63
For the tail vane, the material that may be best suited for the design is glass-fiber-reinforced
plastic, or GFRP. There are multiple reasons why GFRP is a preferred material to use. One
reason GFRP would be an excellent material, is because it has a very high strength to weight
ratio. The tail vane would be lightweight, but be strong enough to rotate the wind turbine.
Another reason is because it has great resistance to the environment. It will not be affected by
acid rain, salts, or most chemicals. The final reason it is a great material to use is its low
maintenance. GFRP can potentially show no signs of wear even after 30 years. (Oehlers, 2004)
Application:
The main focus of our problem statement is to develop a mechanism that will optimize the
energy output of the wind turbine. One of the main aspects we have to focus on is a design that
will be able to harvest energy, without having to spend any energy. Wind turbine mechanisms in
the present run on an electric-powered motor yaw drive. It is important to try and think of as
many ways as possible to develop a mechanism that runs free of electricity. One of the most
important parts of these developing mechanisms is the materials. The designs need to make sure
that the wind turbine is sturdy, reliable, efficient, and low maintenance, and the materials used
need to ensure that the design meets these criteria.
Question:
How will the locking device work?
Answer:
The locking device is incorporated into the mechanism design in order to make sure that the
wind turbine top doesn’t keep spinning around in circles due to the frictionless surface. It is also
created to lock the turbine into place at the best angle possible in order to allow it to harvest the
most energy. The locking device consists of a sturdy band wrapped around the turbine that has a
number of titanium pegs along the top. These pegs can jump up and fall down through the use of
pistons. In addition a titanium extrusion is included on the shaft of the wind turbine. This
extrusion should be perpendicular to all the metal pegs as it spins over them.
The locking device works along with a wind direction sensor, a program which monitors which
pegs jump up and which stay down, and a pressure sensor. As a group, these four devices are
used to lock the wind turbine in the optimal location given the present wind conditions. The wind
sensor senses wind direction and sends the information to the program. The program then
calculates which angle the wind turbine needs to be with respect to the ground in order to be in
the best position for energy harvesting. With this information the program will activate the piston
to push up the specific titanium peg that will put the turbine in the best position. As soon as the
turbine extrusion hits the protruded peg, a pressure sensor will go off and the adjacent peg will
pop up completely locking the turbine extrusion into place. This will not allow the turbine to
rotate anymore. When the wind changes direction, the sensor will send the information to the
program, and both pegs will drop allowing the turbine to rotate into its new position.

64
Application:
Because our mechanism is not running on electrical power, we need an addition in order to help
maintain the wind turbines position. The locking device that has been developed could be a great
option to help with this problem. With an expert programmer, wirer, and sufficient
meteorological devices, the locking device presented could be a real possibility. The position of
the wind turbine is the most important part of energy-harvesting. If the wind turbine is not in a
good position, the energy gathered will not even come close to its potential. Therefore a locking
device is definitely the most important aspect of our mechanism.
Question:
How would the mechanism sense wind direction?
Answer:
The mechanism would sense wind direction through the use of an already created device. The
WindSonic™ Sensor is a wind vane that measures wind direction only. It can be attached to
many surfaces using a sensor mounting kit. Therefore it can easily be mounted near or on top of
the wind turbine, in an area where the wind will not be redirected leading to false readings. The
wind sensor works with four ultrasonic transducers arranged as two pairs at right angles to each
other. Each pair is used to measure the component of the wind in the direction between the
transducers: the North-South component and the East-West component. In order to find the wind
angle the components are combined. The wind angle is equivalent to the arctangent of the East-
West component divided by the North-South component. (Gill Instruments, 2011)
Application:
In order for the designed locking device to work, a wind sensor is necessary. We do not have the
expertise in the field of meteorology in order to create the device; therefore we have to use a
previously created device. The sensor determines wind direction through the use of simple
trigonometry. As mentioned earlier, the position of the wind turbine is the most important part of
energy-harvesting, and this sole device is the powerhouse of identifying the wind turbines
optimal position.

65
From: Lucy Lin
Date: 3/12/14
Re: Research Paper #2 – Part 1
Problem Statement:
Our team’s solution is a downwind turbine rotation mechanism. Downwind turbines offer many
benefits over the traditional upwind turbine designs. These benefits make downwind turbines
more suitable for harvesting wind energy than upwind turbines under unique geographic and
atmospheric conditions. Downwind turbine designs take advantage of drag from the wind to
rotate into the ideal position automatically without the any need of any additional energy or
components.
Question:
Why are most wind turbines facing the wind?
Answer:
In the past, downwind turbines were not viewed as a feasible alternative due to the presence of
tower shadow. Tower shadow refers to the turbulence created from the blades being located
behind the nacelle instead of in front of it. Having the turbine blades behind the nacelle may
eventually result in fatigue in the blades over time (Obeyanji, Faust, Santos & German, 2009).
Due to the large amount of maintenance and cost associated with the problem of tower shadow,
up wind turbine designs were preferred. Now with new technology, engineers have found ways
to increase the diameter in blades, diminishing the presence of tower shadow and conserving the
energy that was once lost due to it. This can be especially beneficial in mountainous regions such
as Japan because down wind turbines are more efficient when placed on top of a hill due to the
direction that the wind is travelling in ("Downwind Rotor," n.d.). Since the primary problem that
was associated with down wind turbines is now addressed, this mechanism is now becoming a
viable and favorable alternative to up wind turbine designs.
Application:
Our team is looking at down wind turbines as part of our alternative solution. In order to make an
efficient turbine design, we must look into additional ways to eliminate, if not highly diminish
the presence of tower shadow. We will find the optimized length for the diameter of the blade in
order to minimize the presence of tower shadow, along with creating a more aerodynamic
nacelle (Tong, 2010). By implementing both features, down wind turbines will yield a greater
energy output than up wind designs if placed in a specific location. Down wind turbines are more

66
effective when placed on a hill or a mountainous region due to the wind striking the blade in a
perpendicular manner, as opposed to in a parallel manner in an up wind turbine design, thus
increasing the energy yield (Matsunobu et al., 2009). Even on flat ground, down wind turbines
generate almost the same amount of energy as up wind turbines which means that it is as good, if
not better than up wind turbine designs in terms of generating energy.
Question:
How does wind behave at the height of the turbine? Is wind gusty or random?
Answer:
At higher altitudes, wind conditions are more consistent and easier to predict. In addition, the
speed of the wind also increases as the height increases (Obeyanji, Faust, Santos & German,
2009). This is an important concept to note as it explains why most wind turbines are built at
higher heights. According to the velocity-cubed law, when all other parameters are the same,
doubling the velocity in turns creates three times the amount of power (Obeyanji, Faust, Santos
& German, 2009). This means that with a greater amount of wind speed, the available power
generated is significantly increased. Also, wind flowing uphill is beneficial to down wind turbine
designs due to the direction in which the wind is striking the blades as mentioned earlier
(Matsunobu et al., 2009). Although wind conditions, are for the most part, predictable at higher
altitudes, in the case of very high winds or irregular wind patterns, the application of using a
down wind turbine design will allow the load of the wind to be transferred from the blades to the
tower (Obeyanji, Faust, Santos & German, 2009). This decreases the reliance on the structure,
making it safer but may also cause fatigue to the blades over time.
Application:
Our team’s design must address the fatigue that a downwind turbine causes the blades of the
wind turbine. Even though this is a vital problem to address, it is also important to keep note that
one of the benefits of having a down wind turbine design is that it relieves the stress from the
tower by directing it to the blades (Obeyanji, Faust, Santos & German, 2009). Thus, in each
design, at least one component of the turbine is receiving the pressure generated by the wind in a
negative manner. In addition, although wind speeds are faster at greater height which results in
more power, one must also note that having a structure at such heights comes with a change in
temperature, an increased possibility of liabilities, a rise in costs and higher exposure to
turbulence (Obeyanji, Faust, Santos & German, 2009). Thus, it is important that our team will to
make the right adjustments to make sure that an increase in power output would not sacrifice the
overall efficiency of the turbine.
Question:
Would the turbine be naturally inclined to turn if the yaw drive was frictionless?

67
Answer:
The yaw drive currently is used to make sure that the rotor of the wind turbine is facing the
direction of the wind at all times, regardless of the current wind condition. If the drive were
frictionless, the turbine would be naturally inclined to turn due to the drag of the wind.
Additionally, if there were large gusts of wind, the frictionless drive will be more adept in
handing it because it would be capable of moving freely, adjusting itself to counteract the drag
created by the wind. In case of black outs, an up wind turbine design would be unable to
function. However, with downwind designs, the low friction yaw drive would cause the blades to
rotate automatically without the use of electricity. A frictionless yaw drive in down wind turbine
designs also addresses the problem of wind shadow. Wind shadow is when a random gust of
wind hits the blade of the turbines, shaking the structure (Obeyanji, Faust, Santos & German,
2009). An up wind design has sensors to adjust to the condition but with a downwind design, it
rolls with the gust of wind automatically. It wasn’t until recently that down wind turbines
became a real possibility due to the decrease in blade radius. When the radius of the blade was
smaller, wind shadow caused significant damage to the blades over time (Matsunobu et al.,
2009).
Application:
Our turbine design has to be able to rotate on a low friction yaw drive, which increases the
effectiveness of the structure. Now that we have the technology and the ability to create larger
turbines, the effects on tower shadow on large radius blades are reduced significantly. The
frictionless yaw drive will allow the turbine to function during black outs and harsh wind
conditions. The problem of wind shadow is reduced, and all of these benefits make having a
down wind turbine with a nearly frictionless yaw drive a viable possibility. For the design to
function better than its counterpart up wind structure, it needs to be placed on a hill or a
mountainous terrain. On flat land, however, although the two designs generate essentially the
same amount of energy, our design features no complex motor or computer system, lowering the
costs and maintenance. Our team will also address the current problems of wind shadow and
tower shadow by adding in a more aerodynamic nacelle and making the blade radius larger and
in a different shape.

68
From: Maxwell Brown
Date: March 19th
, 2014
Problem Statement:
The Fan Mechanism is a device that resembles a helicopters tail and it will be attached to the
upper portion of a wind turbine. The device will utilize a fan (rotor) at the end of the tail to vary
its position.
Question:
What type of material or surface allows for rotation while requiring the smallest amount of
energy?
Answer:
In order for the mechanism to be useful, it must be able to effectively rotate the upper portion of
the turbine 360 degrees about the vertical axis. A mechanism that would require a tremendous
amount of energy to rotate would not be favorable in the final design. A favorable design would
require little to no energy to enable rotation. That is why a low friction surface is desired for the
mechanism. The lower the friction, the lower the amount of rotational energy required and thus,
a better design.
Magnetic bearings have been on the rise within the last 30 years. They have come down in cost
and have become more practical to be used in mechanical machinery. Traditionally, a magnetic
bearing would be used for high-speed mechanisms, however; this technology can be potentially
used for large rotational objects. Magnetic bearings operate with negligible friction and are very
reliable and predictable. They work by providing an electrical current to magnets that in return
suspend an object in the air and allow it to rotate freely. This technology could very well be
applied to the fan mechanism design however; the cost for technology like this would be so
excessive that the turbine would end up costing money to operate (Eaton, 2010).
A superconducting zero friction surface is obviously strongly desired for this design. However,
this technology does not cost effectively exist yet and if it did, it would most likely not be used
for wind turbines. Instead, every home would have their own turbine that would rotate
theoretically forever and produce an infinite amount of electrical energy. Unfortunately, this is
not the case and a zero friction surface cannot be used for this design.

69
Fortunately, there are effective low friction surfaces currently used today. The traditional
bearing is used across all industries and there certainly is a reason why. The purpose of a
bearing is to reduce the friction between two connecting piece and allows for rotation.
Traditional bearings are used for all different types of rotational machinery. From airplane
engines to wind turbines, ball bearings play a critical roll in rotation. They are lubricated and
require maintenance often to be effective. Most bearings for ordinary mechanical use utilize
high carbon and high chromium steel (Wang, 2000, pp. 159-173).
The one issue with traditional ball bearings is that they experience problems due to the vibration
created between the two connecting pieces. This vibration damages the ball bearing and requires
increased maintenance. These problems however are easily overcome with regular maintenance
and lubrication. Overall, traditional ball bearings are the most desirable low friction surface for
this design (Huang et al., 2007, pp. 193-207).
Application:
Our team is attempting to design a horizontal axis wind turbine that can effectively rotate itself
into an optimal energy producing position. In order to do this, the mechanism must allow the
upper portion of the wind turbine to rotate. The only way to do this is to have a low friction
surface connecting the mechanism to the turbine blades and gearbox. Without a low friction
surface, a tremendous amount of energy would be required to rotate the upper portion of the
wind turbine and this would be both inefficient and costly. We have determined that using a
traditional ball bearing, technology that has been effectively proven in the industry for decades,
would be most effective for our design. Sometime it is better to us technology that is known and
proven than go out on a limb and try something that may fail. Traditional ball bearings work
extremely well and when they receive regular maintenance, they can operate with negligible
friction, which is strongly desired for this design.
Question:
How will the Fan Mechanism be powered?
Answer:
In order for the Fan Mechanism to normally operate, energy is required to power the fan (rotor).
Energy is required for the majority of the time while this mechanism is in operation. There are
rare instances when the Fan Mechanism can reposition itself solely using the power of the wind
and act like a fantail. For most of the time however, energy will be required.
There are multitudes of ways in which the mechanism can be powered. These ways range from
having the wind turbine power the mechanism to having an external power source power to the
mechanism. After careful consideration, it was determined that it would be most effective for
the mechanism to be powered by the wind turbine.
A recent study conducted by De Broe and his coauthors investigated the implementation of peak
power trackers on small-scale wind turbines. Peak power trackers effectively convert wind
energy into electrical energy. By using a peak power tracker, wind energy can be used more

70
efficiently and more electricity can be generated. In this study, the electrical energy created goes
directly to a battery bank for later usage. That electrical energy is either used to spin the turbine
blades and generate more electricity, is grounded (in standalone turbines), or enters the power
grid (in grid integrated turbines). The results of the study confirmed that the power tracker
increased electrical energy output significantly (Broe, 1999, pp. 1630-1635).
Application:
Our team is attempting to design a mechanism that can rotate the upper portion of a wind turbine
into an optimal energy producing position. In order for the upper portion of the turbine to rotate,
electrical energy must be used to spin the fan that can in return rotate the upper portion of the
turbine. This team determined that it would be most effective to have the wind turbine supply
the energy necessary to spin the fan. Based on the journal article by De Broe and coauthors, a
peak power tracker, when integrated into a small-scale wind turbine can significantly increase
electrical power output. Our pair has decided to implement that same technology into our
design. By implementing a peak power tracker into the wind turbine, wind energy can then be
converted into electrical energy. That electrical energy can then be stored in a battery connected
to the main hub of the mechanism. The electrical energy in the battery can then be used to power
the fan. This is by far the best way to power the mechanism and rotate the upper portion of the
wind turbine into an optimal position.
Question:
What type of sensor technology should the Fan Mechanism use determine when it needs to
change direction?
Answer:
A recent journal article published by Makinwa and Huijsing introduces a smart wind sensor that
has many applications. The journal article begins with an explanation of traditional wind sensors
and how they are inconsistent and unreliable. Traditional wind sensors have thermopiles that
output small insignificant data. Thermopiles are devices that convert thermal energy into
electrical energy. Because the thermopile output is small, complex circuitry is required to make
use of the data. Because the signals outputted are small, they are vulnerable to outside
interference during transport. This results in inaccurate data and an inaccurate representation of
the winds velocity (Makinwa, 2002, pp. 15-20).
The journal article introduces a new type of sensor, a smart sensor that can better predict the
wind within a 4% accuracy. This sensor uses thermal sigma-delta modulation techniques, which
allow for the increase in accuracy. These techniques involve moving the position of the
thermopiles, adding four of them, as well as adding a central diode. By taking these measures,
the accuracy of the sensor increased. The smart sensor that was created and tested in this journal
article was proven to significantly increase the accuracy of the sensors. More accurate sensors
lead to better data and thus a better way to determine the winds true direction. These sensors are
the best way of predicting the winds speed and direction (Makinwa, 2002, pp. 15-20).

71
Application:
Our team is designing a wind turbine that can adapt to its environment. The only way in which
the wind turbine can adapt to its environment is if it can effectively sense it. Our Fan
Mechanism must be able to reposition the wind turbine into a position that is optimal for
producing energy. The smart sensors as described in the journal article published by Makinwa
and Huijsing will be perfect for the Fan Mechanism. This sensor is extremely advanced and can
accurately obtain wind speed and direction data. Once that data is received, the Fan Mechanism
will utilize it and adjust its position. A simple algorithm programed into the Fan Mechanism will
convert the wind speed and direction data into coordinates. Once those coordinates are
determined, the Fan Mechanisms computer will notify the fan and the braking system to go into
effect and it will reposition the turbine accurately.

72
To: Professor Nueburger, WTSN 104, Section 57
From: Stephen Valvo Partner Name: Adam Suda
Date: 3/12/2014
Problem Statement:
Develop a mechanism that would vary the position of a horizontal axis wind turbine to maximize
electrical output in any wind conditions
Our mechanism will feature a sensor that will determine the position of the wind, and will then
send electronic signals to a motor that will, through a series of gears, turn the nacelle of the wind
turbine to face the wind.
Question:
What materials must the mechanism be made out of, and which materials will make the motor
the strongest?
Answer:
The materials that our yaw system will be constructed from must be extremely durable.
However, the materials of two sections of the yaw system must be considered: the structure of
the system, and the gears. The yaw system will have to directly hold the weight of the nacelle
and the blades of the turbine, which account for a large amount of the weight of the turbine. One
of the materials that should be considered favorably for the construction of this mechanism is
steel. Steel is already used throughout a lot of the turbine because it is extremely strong, and is
also easy and cheap to produce (Hogg, 2010 p.6). Using steel could decrease some of the costs
for the mechanism, and would also ensure that the mechanism can hold the weight of the nacelle.
The materials of the gears that will rotate the nacelle must also be considered, because there are
different forces acting on the gears than the structure, as the gears are rotating and forces are
acting from gear to gear. Often times, steel is used in gears due to its strength and low cost of
production. The materials that are selected for the gears must satisfy two requirements:
fabrication requirements and performance requirements. The fabrication requirements include
machinability and response to heat, while performance requirements include how the gears
actually function. (Davis, 2005).
Application:
Based on the research of materials of a yaw system, it is evident that steel should be used for
both the gears of the yaw drive, and the structure of the mechanism as well. Not only will this
decrease the cost of producing the mechanism, but it will also give the mechanism the maximum
strength and durability. Certain types of steel are used in different situations. Since our
mechanism will be inside the turbine, corrosion will not be a major issue, therefore stainless steel

73
will not be used in our mechanism (stainless steel is often used in gears to prevent corrosion)
(Davis, 2005). Based on a table from Joseph Davis’ book Gear Materials, Properties, and
manufacture, the steel grade that should be used for the gears is grade 1045.
Question:
How will the sensor detect the current wind conditions and relay the information to the motor?
Answer:
There are several different types of sensors that are used to detect wind conditions. Some sensors
are small and can fit in a person’s pocket, and others are designed to be used on wind turbines.
Obtaining the correct wind sensor for this mechanism and turbine is essential, because if the
sensor cannot withstand large wind gusts or a large temperature range, it is possible that the
sensor will break when on top of a wind turbine. When the sensor gets information about the
current wind conditions, it outputs voltage, which carries the information about the conditions
("Met one instruments ," ). This voltage then goes into some central intelligence, which reads the
information. In order to make the motor turn, the central intelligence that processes this data will
send a signal to the motor that will then turn the yaw drive, which turns the nacelle into the wind.
Application:
Our sensor system will feature both a wind speed sensor and a wind direction sensor. Our wind
speed sensor will be based off of the Met One Model 010C Wind Speed Sensor. This sensor has
an operating range of up to 125mph, or 60m/s ("Met one instruments ," ). However, the material
and strength of the sensor will be modified to increase the operating range. We will also use a
wind direction sensor based off of the Met One Model 020C Wind Direction Sensor, which will
also be modified to increase the sensor’s operating range and strength. The sensor’s will then
relay information to a central intelligence system that will finally rotate the yaw drive to face the
nacelle into the wind.
Question:
How will the yaw drive use energy that is generated from the wind turbine?
Answer:
When the blades of a wind turbine are rotating, the blades power a generator, which is the source
of the electricity that is generated from the wind turbine. This generator outputs AC voltage,
which can then be sent out of the wind turbine and out to other power plants, energy companies,
or homes or other buildings ("How does a," 2013). The motor that will run the yaw drive will
require energy to run, more specifically electricity. While motors usually have external power
sources, we need ours to run on the electricity that is produced from the wind turbine to satisfy
our requirements. However, this will do more than simply reduce costs by eliminating the need

74
for an additional power source. Since we will be recycling energy, we will be designing a
mechanism that is more environmentally friendly.
Application:
Since the wind turbine will not need to be constantly rotated, the energy needed to rotate the
wind turbine will be very small, especially since our mechanism will allow the turbine to face the
wind at all time, so it will always be producing electricity. After the electricity is produced in the
generator in the nacelle, some of the electricity will go directly to the motor to power it. There
will be no energy conversion needed because the motor can run on AC electricity, and the
generator that is in the wind turbine generates AC electricity.

75
From: Ryan Yetter
Date: 3/12/14
Re: Research Paper #2 - Part 1
Problem Statement:
Alternative Solutions:
Create a wind turbine that rotates with the help of a sail/tail vane and a frictionless surface.
Question:
How much force can the tail vane produce?
Answer:
In order for our design to work we need to make sure that a tail vane can produce enough force
on its own to rotate the wind turbine. Through are research we have found that the force
produced by wind is dependent on many factors. Many researches use complicated formulas to
determine wind forces on structures. One of the simpler formulas to determine the force of wind
on a structure is, the surface area being exposed multiplied by velocity of the wind squared and
then multiplying it by the drag coefficient of an object. This formula accounts for the wind
pressure on the front of the structure as well as suction caused by the drag produced from the
wind going around the structure. This formula will be helpful when determining how large the
tail vane should be to rotate the turbine along with what forces the tail vane should be made to
withstand.
Question:
How much force is needed to rotate a wind turbine?
Answer:
The horizontal rotation of a wind turbine requires a lot of torque in order to rotate, because of
this many traditional wind turbines use high powered motors to rotate the hub. Through our
research we have found that the average output of the motors used to rotate a wind turbine is
about 42000 Nm. This is a large amount of force required, however, we can overcome this large
force needed by using a tail boom as seen in figure 1. A combined use of the tail vane and the tail
boom we can expect to see that the wind turbine can be rotated without the use of motors.

76
Question:
How cost-efficient will this idea be?
Answer:
The use of a tail vane constructed of glass fiber reinforced plastic, this material that has a very
efficient strength to weight ration and is also relatively cheap, is a great combination to make the
tail vane cost efficient. If we use the data we gathered along with the formulas we can create a
rough estimate of how large the tail vane should be along with the force we can expect. With
these two properties but together we can come up with the cost of the tail vane and boom to be
around thirty thousand dollars, at a cost of 65 per square foot. When you also add in the two
thousand dollars for the WindSonic device which will detect wind speed and direction and we
also need to take into account that the locking mechanism worth six thousand dollarsb. This
brings us right up to our budget of thirty eight thousand dollars, however our system of the use of
a tail vane and locking system will be much more energy efficient than a traditional motor
because our system does not require nearly as much energy.
Application:
Our team is attempting to find the most efficient way to rotate a wind turbine to make it energy
efficient. Our design incorporates a frictionless surface, locking mechanism, a tail vane and a
wind direction/speed sensor. Our design incorporates resources that are already incorporated into
the wind turbine, wind. By using the wind the turbine needs to generate electricity we are
creating a self-sustaining reliable platform on which to make an efficient wind turbine. With the
use of our design I believe that our design that does not use traditional motors to rotate the
turbine is both energy efficient and will allow for the maximum energy output.

77
References
American Bird Conservancy’s Policy Statement on Wind Energy. (n.d.). American Bird
Conservancy’s Policy Statement on Wind Energy. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from
http://www.abcbirds.org/abcprograms/policy/collisions/wind_policy.html.
Benini, E., & Toffolo, A. (2002). Optimal design of horizontal-axis wind turbines using
blade-element theory and evolutionary computation. Journal of Solar Energy
Engineering, 124 (4), 357-363. Retrieved from zp3xh7ca4f.scholar.serialssolutions.com.
Besnard, Francois, & Bertling, Lina (2010). An Approach for Condition-Based Maintenance
Optimization Applied to Wind Turbine Blades. IEEE Transactions on Substainable
Energy, Vol. 1, No. 2. Retrieved from
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5466162.
Bica, Ioan (2003). Magnetorheological suspension electromagnetic brake. Journal of Magnetism
and Magnetic Materials 270. Retrieved from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885303007169.
Blau, Peter J. (2001). Compositions, Functions, and Testing of Friction Brake Materials And
Their Additives. Retrieved from:
http://web.ornl.gov/~webworks/cppr/y2001/rpt/110463.pdf.
Bonfiglioli, W. (n.d.). Bonfiglioli wind. Retrieved from
http://www.bonfiglioli.com/media/filer_public/16/4c/164c8e41-7732-4698-80f1-
7d6bb31d1870/br_cat_agl_int_eng_r00_0.pdf.
Brain, Marshall & Harris, William (2011). How Helicopters work. Retrieved from:
http://science.howstuffworks.com/transport/flight/modern/helicopter4.htm.
Broe, A. D., Drouilhet, S., & Gevorgian, V. (1999). A peak power tracker for small wind
turbines in battery charging applications. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion,
14(4), 1630-1635. doi: 10.1109/60.815116.
Chia Chen Ciang. , & Jung-Ryul Lee, (2008). Structural health monitoring for a wind
turbine system: a review of damage detection methods. M EASUREMENT SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY, 19, Retrieved from http://iopscience.iop.org/0957-
0233/19/12/122001/pdf/0957-0233_19_12_122001.pdf.
Christensen, M., Budtz, L. (2010). U.S. Patent No. 793964. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office.

78
Dalili, N., Edrisy, A., & Carriveau, R. (2009). A review of surphace engineering issues
critical to wind turbine performance. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13(2),
428-438. Retrieved from
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032107001554.
Davis, J. R. (2005). Gear materials, properties, and manufacture. ASM International. Retrieved
from http://books.google.com/books.
De Lucas, M., Janss, G. F., & Ferrer, M. (2004). The effects of a wind farm on birds in a
migration point: the Strait of Gibraltar. Biodiversity & Conservation,13(2), 395-407.
Donachie, M. J. (2002). Titanium: A Technical Guide. Metals Park, OH: ASM International.
Downwind rotor. (n.d.). Retrieved March 8, 2014, from
http://www.hitachi.com/products/power/wind-turbine/feature/rotor/index.html.
Dvorak, M. J., Archer, C. L., & Jacobson, M. Z. (2010). California offshore wind energy
potential. Renewable Energy, 35(6), 1244-1254.
Eaton, D., Rama, J., Singhal, S., (2010). Magnetic bearing applications & economics, Petroleum
and Chemical Industry Conference (PCIC), 2010 Record of Conference Papers Industry
Applications Society 57th Annual, doi: 10.1109/PCIC.2010.5666819.
FAQs for small wind systems. (2013, January 1). FAQs for small wind systems. Retrieved
May 7, 2014, fromhttps://www.awea.org/Issues/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=4
638&navItemNumber=727
Fuglsang, P., & Thomsen, K. (2001). Site-Specific Design Optimization of 1.5?2.0 MW Wind
Turbines. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 123(4), 296.
GE. Ge energy 1.5 mw wind turbine. Retrieved from
http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~moyer/GEOS24705/Readings/GEA14954C15-MW-
Broch.pdf.
Gill Instruments. (2011). WindSonic User Manual . Lymington: Gill Instruments Limited.
Givens, B. (2002). Trent mesa wind project. Retrieved from
http://www.trentmesa.com/techdetails.htm.
Golfman, Y. (2012). Hybrid Anisotropic Materials for Wind Power Turbine Blades. Boca Raton,
FL: CRC Press. 55-57. Retrieved from http://www.eblib.com.
Grujicic, M. M., Arakere, G. G., & Pandurangan, B. B. (2010). Multidisciplinary Design
Optimization for Glass-Fiber Epoxy-Matrix Composite 5 MW Horizontal-Axis Wind-
Turbine Blades. Journal Of Materials Engineering & Performance, 19(8), 1116-1127.

79
Gurit, E. (2014). Wind turbine blade aerodynamics. Wind Energy Handbook, 1-5. Retrieved
from http://www.gurit.com.
Han, J., Mol, A. P., Lu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2009). Onshore wind power development in China:
Challenges behind a successful story. Energy Policy, 37(8), 2941-2951.
Hanning, C. D., & Evans, A. (2010). Wind turbine noise. Policy, 38, 2520-7.
Hau, E. (2000). Windturbines. Berlin, Germany: Springer Publications. 46-48 Retrieved from
http://www.worldcat.org.
Hau, E., & Renouard, H. V. (2006). Wind turbines fundamentals, technologies, application,
economics (2nd [English] ed.). Berlin: Springer.
Hills, R. L. (1994). Power from wind: a history of windmill technology. Cambridge [England:
Cambridge University Press.
Hogg, P. (2010). Wind turbine blade materials. Informally published manuscript, Retrieved from
http://www.supergen.org.uk/docs/presentations/2010-03-
25_1420_SUPERGENWind_Fa_Presneation_PaulHogg.pdf.
How does a wind turbine produce electricity?. (2013). Retrieved from
http://www.globalwindday.org/faq/how-does-a-wind-turbine-produce-electricity.
Huang, R., Xi, L., Li, X., Liu, C. R., Qiu, H., & Lee, J. (2007). Residual life predictions for ball
bearings based on self-organizing map and back propagation neural network methods.
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(1), 193-207. doi:
10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.008.
Inventus Holdings (2013). Quiet Wind Turbine Blade Retrieved February 12, 2014,
from http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20130149162.
Kaneko, D., Tada, T., Kurokawa, T., Gong J.P., & Osada, Y. (2005). Advanced Materials.
Mechanically Strong Hydrogels with Ultra-Low Frictional Coefficients, 17(5), 535-538.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adma.200400739/pdf.
Kaundinya, D. P., Balachandra, P., & Ravindranath, N. (2009). Grid-connected versus stand-
alone energy systems for decentralized power—A review of literature. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(8), 2041-2050.
Leisham, J. Gordon (2006). Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. Retrieved from:
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nMV-TkaX-
9cC&oi=fnd&pg=PR19&dq=helicopter+tail+rotor&ots=CpgTgf3JdA&sig=j0pQvPrydu0
3BkKX9JhdDArtDZU#v=onepage&q=helicopter%20tail%20rotor&f=false.
Li, S., Wunsch, D. C., O'Hair, E. A., & Giesselmann, M. G. (2001). Using neural networks to

80
estimate wind turbine power generation. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conservation,
16(3), 276-282. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=937208.
Load cell wind forces. (2011, December 04). Retrieved from
http://www.vishaypg.com/docs/11874/vpg-07.pdf.
Lytham Windmill Museum - The Mill and Its Workings. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.lythamwindmill.co.uk/The-Mill-and-Its-Workings.html.
Makinwa, K. A., & Huijsing, J. H. (2002). A smart wind sensor using thermal sigma-delta
modulation techniques. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 97-98, 15-20. doi:
10.1016/S0924-4247(02)00034-1.
Manwell, J. F., McGowan, J. G., & Rogers, A. L. (2002). Wind Energy Explained: Theory,
Design and Application. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470846127.
Matsunobu, T., Hasegawa, T., Isogawa, M., Sato, K., Futami, M., & Kato, H. (2009).
Development of 2-MW Downwind Turbine Tailored to Japanese Conditions. Hitachi
Review, 58(5), 213.
Miller, L. E. (2012, October 27). Energy Consumption in Wind Facilities. . Retrieved May 7,
2014, from http://www.aweo.org/windconsumption.html
Morgan, C., Bossanyi, E., & Seifert, H. (2, April 98). Assessment of safety risks arising
from wind turbine icing. Retrieved from
http://arcticwind.vtt.fi/boreasiv/assessment_of_safety.pdf.
Murugan, Senthil & Ganguli, Ranjan (2005). Aeroelastic Stability Enhancement and Vibration
Suppression in a Composite Helicopter Rotor. Journal of Aircraft Vol. 42 No. 4.
Retrieved from:http://www.researchgate.net/publication/28597588_Aeroelastic_Stability
_Enhancement_and_Vibration_Suppression_in_a_Composite_Helicopter_Rotor/file/60b
7d521eb0de64f85.pdf.
Obeyanji, J., Faust, J., Santos , D., & German, W. (2009).High altitude wind energy. Retrieved
from http://aweia.org/new/index.php/publication/49-high-altitude-wind-energy.
Oehlers, D. J. (2004). Design of FRP and steel plated RC structures: Retrofitting Beams And
Slabs For Strength, Stiffness and Ductility. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Petersen, E., Mortense, N., Landberg, L., Hojstrup, J., & Frank, H. (1997). Wind power
meteorology. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.123.5357&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Presher, A. (2010). Wind Turbines—Bigger and Better. Design News, 65(10), 54-57.

81
Protecting Wind Turbines in Extreme Temperatures. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/06/protecting-wind-
turbines-in-extreme-temperatures
Rideout, K., Copes, R., & Bos, C. (2010). National Collaberative Center for
Environmental Health, Jan 2010, Retrieved from
http://www.ccnse.ca/sites/default/files/Wind_Turbines_January_2010.pdf.
Rusca, P. (2010). Brevini yaw and pitch drives. Retrieved from
http://www.breviniwind.com/index.php?load=product&id=2&lang=en_EN.
Schienitzki, H., Strobl, D., Gutierrez, V., & Gräber, M. (2014). Wind vanes to measure wind
direction. Retrieved from http://www.ammonit.com/en/products/sensors/wind-vanes.
Straub, Friedrich K. & King, Robert J. (1996). Application of smart materials to control of a
helicopter rotor. SPIE Vol. 2721 No. 66. Retrieved from:
http://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org.
Surgevil, T., & Akpinar, E. (2005, May). Modelling of a 5-kw wind energy conversion system.
Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148104003660?np
Titanium (Ti). (2014). In Encyclopᴂdia Britannica. Retrieved from
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/597135/titanium.
Tong, W. (2010). Wind power generation and wind turbine design. (pp. 403-405). Billerica: WIT
Press. Retrieved from http://nashaucheba.ru/docs/23/22839/conv_1/file1.pdf.
United States Forest Service. (n.d.). A guide to fiber-reinforced polymer. Retrieved
from http://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/htmlpubs/htm06232824/page03.htm.
Walford, Christopher A.(2006). Wind Turbine Reliability: Understanding and minimizing Wind
Turbine Operation and Maintenance Costs. Sandia Report SAND2006-1100.
Retrieved from: http://www.anecto.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/OM_Costs.pdf4.
Wang, L., Snidle, R., & Gu, L. (2000). Rolling contact silicon nitride bearing technology: A
review of recent research. Wear, 246(1-2), 159-173. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00504-
4.
Wilburn, D. R. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey, (2011). Wind energy in
the United States and materials required for the land-based wind turbine industry from
2010 through 2030 (5036). Retrieved from website:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2011/5036/sir2011-5036.pdf.
Wilkinson, M., Spianto, F., & Knowles, M. (2006). Towards the Zero Maintenance Wind
Turbine. Universities Power Engineering Converence Volume 1. Retrieved
from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4218647.

82
Wind Energy: Product and Solutions. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.boschrexroth.co.uk/country_units/europe/united_kingdom/en/industries/Rene
wables_landing/wind_energy/wind_components/index.jsp.

Wind turbine final report

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to Wind turbine final report

Recently uploaded

Wind turbine final report