The student created a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine article for a class project. They surveyed audiences to gather feedback. While most respondents felt the projects resembled real products and had positive elements, feedback also identified areas for improvement. Sound levels were inconsistent across the documentary and radio trailer. The summaries highlighted both what worked well and what could be enhanced, showing the value of audience feedback for creating successful media.
The focus group felt that the documentary, radio trailer, and double page spread were effectively linked together through shared elements like music and imagery. While the content may not appeal to some male viewers, most of the female focus group members expressed interest in watching the documentary based on the promotional materials. The materials were seen as more engaging than other documentaries on similar topics.
The document summarizes feedback from a questionnaire given to viewers of a student documentary about cyberbullying. Key findings included:
1) 100% of viewers said they would continue watching the full documentary after seeing the opening.
2) Viewers provided varied feedback on what they liked most, showing different elements appealed to different tastes.
3) Most said they would not change anything, but some suggested interviewing a victim or their family.
4) Viewers unanimously said the sound suited the topic and the documentary was well composed with good flow.
5) All viewers said the documentary made them more aware of cyberbullying.
The student received feedback on their film poster, magazine cover, and trailer from classmates and social media users. This feedback helped them identify strengths to emphasize and weaknesses to improve. For the poster, feedback suggested making the tagline font larger, which they did. Most feedback on the magazine cover and trailer was positive. The feedback process helped the student understand how to better convey their intended horror genre and produce higher quality final works.
The document summarizes feedback from 15 people who viewed the documentary, listened to the radio trailer, and read the magazine article. Most said they would continue watching the full documentary. Responses to the quality of interviews and flow of the documentary were positive. While most felt the sound suited the topic, some thought the music was too upbeat. Minor changes like adding background music and speeding up the start were suggested. All felt the documentary effectively raised awareness of cyberbullying as intended. The radio trailer and article were also well-received except a few thought the trailer too slow. Gaining audience perspective provided useful insights and confirmed the documentary met its goal of informing viewers about cyberbullying.
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?charl0tte
The focus group provided feedback on the documentary, radio trailer, and print advert through a questionnaire. For the documentary, sound quality received some criticism but it was otherwise well-received. The radio trailer was informative with good sound, but lacked professionalism. The print advert was eye-catching but provided little information. Overall, the three products worked well together but could be improved by addressing issues with sound levels and voiceover tone/quality.
The audience provided feedback on the documentary in the form of a questionnaire with ratings. Most people rated the documentary as average, giving it a 7 out of 10. While it was not seen as poor, there was still room for improvement to receive more top ratings. When asked about used codes and conventions, interviews were identified as an effective element. However, the ancillary tasks were only viewed as effectively promoting the documentary by 61% of respondents. Verbal feedback noted good sound and music but identified inconsistencies between voiceover and on-screen text as an area for improvement.
The document summarizes the results of an audience feedback questionnaire about a documentary on tanning. Respondents generally rated the information, entertainment value, production quality, sound, editing and continuity of the documentary positively. Most said they would continue watching after 5 minutes and liked the documentary. Suggested areas for improvement included longer cutaways, improved sound balancing, and representing both benefits and negatives of tanning. Feedback on radio spots, print ads and how well the promotional elements worked together to promote the documentary was also positive overall.
The document discusses using peer feedback to review and improve a coursework project. The authors used various feedback methods, including face-to-face reviews, video reviews on social media platforms like YouTube, and questionnaires. Based on the feedback received, they made changes like refilming a character's part and replacing the black background in the opening video sequence. A questionnaire of 20 people provided generally positive feedback on the title sequence, target age range, magazine, and DVD cover representations.
The focus group felt that the documentary, radio trailer, and double page spread were effectively linked together through shared elements like music and imagery. While the content may not appeal to some male viewers, most of the female focus group members expressed interest in watching the documentary based on the promotional materials. The materials were seen as more engaging than other documentaries on similar topics.
The document summarizes feedback from a questionnaire given to viewers of a student documentary about cyberbullying. Key findings included:
1) 100% of viewers said they would continue watching the full documentary after seeing the opening.
2) Viewers provided varied feedback on what they liked most, showing different elements appealed to different tastes.
3) Most said they would not change anything, but some suggested interviewing a victim or their family.
4) Viewers unanimously said the sound suited the topic and the documentary was well composed with good flow.
5) All viewers said the documentary made them more aware of cyberbullying.
The student received feedback on their film poster, magazine cover, and trailer from classmates and social media users. This feedback helped them identify strengths to emphasize and weaknesses to improve. For the poster, feedback suggested making the tagline font larger, which they did. Most feedback on the magazine cover and trailer was positive. The feedback process helped the student understand how to better convey their intended horror genre and produce higher quality final works.
The document summarizes feedback from 15 people who viewed the documentary, listened to the radio trailer, and read the magazine article. Most said they would continue watching the full documentary. Responses to the quality of interviews and flow of the documentary were positive. While most felt the sound suited the topic, some thought the music was too upbeat. Minor changes like adding background music and speeding up the start were suggested. All felt the documentary effectively raised awareness of cyberbullying as intended. The radio trailer and article were also well-received except a few thought the trailer too slow. Gaining audience perspective provided useful insights and confirmed the documentary met its goal of informing viewers about cyberbullying.
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?charl0tte
The focus group provided feedback on the documentary, radio trailer, and print advert through a questionnaire. For the documentary, sound quality received some criticism but it was otherwise well-received. The radio trailer was informative with good sound, but lacked professionalism. The print advert was eye-catching but provided little information. Overall, the three products worked well together but could be improved by addressing issues with sound levels and voiceover tone/quality.
The audience provided feedback on the documentary in the form of a questionnaire with ratings. Most people rated the documentary as average, giving it a 7 out of 10. While it was not seen as poor, there was still room for improvement to receive more top ratings. When asked about used codes and conventions, interviews were identified as an effective element. However, the ancillary tasks were only viewed as effectively promoting the documentary by 61% of respondents. Verbal feedback noted good sound and music but identified inconsistencies between voiceover and on-screen text as an area for improvement.
The document summarizes the results of an audience feedback questionnaire about a documentary on tanning. Respondents generally rated the information, entertainment value, production quality, sound, editing and continuity of the documentary positively. Most said they would continue watching after 5 minutes and liked the documentary. Suggested areas for improvement included longer cutaways, improved sound balancing, and representing both benefits and negatives of tanning. Feedback on radio spots, print ads and how well the promotional elements worked together to promote the documentary was also positive overall.
The document discusses using peer feedback to review and improve a coursework project. The authors used various feedback methods, including face-to-face reviews, video reviews on social media platforms like YouTube, and questionnaires. Based on the feedback received, they made changes like refilming a character's part and replacing the black background in the opening video sequence. A questionnaire of 20 people provided generally positive feedback on the title sequence, target age range, magazine, and DVD cover representations.
The document discusses the importance of receiving feedback from audiences to understand how a media product is received and whether it achieves its intended purpose. The author learned about audience feedback through research projects creating a magazine and movie trailer. Feedback was gathered from various sources, including a media studies teacher, classmates, friends/family, and online surveys, to get perspectives from different demographics. The author found feedback most helpful for improving aspects like visuals, sound, pacing, narrative clarity, and lighting in the movie trailer. Collecting feedback from multiple avenues helped the author tailor the media product to better achieve its goals.
From receiving audience feedback on various parts of the documentary and promotional materials, the documentarian learned several things:
1) The message and interviews came across clearly but some audio needed adjusting.
2) Simple, effective music choices worked well but some elements needed more refinement.
3) Expert interviews helped reinforce the topic but using a variety of experts would have provided more perspectives.
4) The magazine layout and design could have been improved with more planning and attention to conventions.
5) Including clips from the documentary in the radio trailer intrigued listeners but the music and sound levels required further work.
The document discusses feedback received from various sources on media products created by the author. Key learnings include:
- Feedback from a media studies teacher and classmates on initial drafts helped improve visuals, audio, pacing, and narrative clarity.
- Surveying college peers early on helped determine the general direction but feedback shifted the focus, like adding psychological elements.
- While feedback from a wide audience online could be useful, the author chose to focus on the intended target demographic.
This question asks us on how we met the needs of our audience. This is useful for any A2 Media Studies student who is doing their critical evaluation as part of the Advanced Portfolio.
The document summarizes feedback from audience members on a documentary about binge drinking. Key findings include:
1) Audience members felt the opening sequence effectively introduced the topic of binge drinking.
2) Most agreed there was a good balance of factual information without being overbearing.
3) All agreed the music fit well with the themes and transitions between "fun" and "fatal" sections were smooth.
4) Vox pops added humor that helped audiences relate while formal interviews provided useful facts.
5) A newspaper article and radio trailer promoting the documentary were both found to be eye-catching.
The document summarizes the filmmakers' process of gathering audience feedback through questionnaires to help guide their short film "A Truncated Parable of Complete Normality". They conducted initial online/video questionnaires before filming to inform their script, then further questionnaires after a rough cut and final cut to gauge audience understanding and suggestions. The feedback indicated a 12A rating and helped the filmmakers refine shots and music to better portray the themes and character. In the end, they felt the audience research was invaluable for making key decisions about the film.
The document discusses audience feedback received for a short film called "Saving Grace" about the dangers of drinking. It provides the following key points:
1. The filmmakers conducted research into their target audience of teenagers and students aged 15-30 before filming to understand how to craft the story and message.
2. They distributed questionnaires before and after filming to gather feedback on the synopsis and final film. This feedback suggested changing the music in one scene and adding more shots from the victim's perspective.
3. Each group member also conducted individual questionnaires with varying participants to validate the results. This feedback confirmed the main target audience was students and helped evaluate the film's reception among different age groups.
The feedback from various audiences on the documentary, radio trailer, and print ad was mostly positive but identified some key areas for improvement. Viewers praised the documentary's informative nature, framing, and professional quality, but noted issues with uneven sound levels. Feedback also suggested making cutaways longer and balancing arguments more. Most focus group members said the radio trailer was catchy and would persuade them to watch, though some did not listen to radio. Sound levels, particularly for voiceovers, needed improvement across formats.
Question 3 - What have you learned from your audience feedback?charl0tte
The focus group provided feedback on the documentary, radio trailer, and print advert. For the documentary, they praised the framing and found it informative, but said the sound levels needed improvement. Feedback on the radio trailer noted the catchy music but also sound level issues. Most would watch the documentary after seeing the print advert, though some found the image off-putting. Overall, the products worked well together but could be more professional, especially regarding uneven sound levels across all pieces.
What have you learnt from audience feedbacksgreenacre1992
The document summarizes feedback from a survey about a music video. Key findings include:
- Respondents generally rated the mise-en-scene, editing, and storyline positively but felt the camera work and acting could be improved.
- Most felt the video style matched the music genre and that the narrative was understandable.
- Favorite aspects were the editing, blood, and storyline. Least favorites included special effects, walking shots, and amount of blood.
- Most thought the video would help sell the song but some felt it was too scary. The introduction was seen as a good addition but could grow annoying upon repeat viewings.
Question 3 - What have you learned from your audience feedback?charl0tte
The focus group provided feedback on the documentary, radio trailer, and print advert. For the documentary, they praised the informative content but criticized uneven sound levels. The radio trailer was catchy but some felt it did not appeal to non-radio listeners. Most said the print advert was eye-catching though a few found the image off-putting. Overall, the products worked well together but could be improved by addressing sound issues and making the argument less one-sided.
The document summarizes feedback received from an audience questionnaire about a student-produced short film. Key findings include:
- Respondents correctly identified the film's genre as thriller and felt connected to the main character.
- The club scene and character abduction were most people's favorite parts.
- Editing was viewed as the strongest element of the film by most of the audience.
- Lighting and music were areas identified for possible improvement in a rough cut.
- The final cut addressed this feedback and received an average rating of 4 out of 5 from viewers.
The focus group provided helpful feedback on the documentary, article, and radio trailer. For the documentary, the opening sequence effectively set the topic and the music change was noticeable. Vox pops were comedic and relatable while serious interviews were informative. Both the student and parent wanted to watch more. For the article, images drew attention while facts and varied fonts engaged readers. The radio trailer used a mix of serious and comedic clips to tell the "fun or fatal" story effectively. Overall, the audience research validated that the key messages and tone were conveyed appropriately.
The document summarizes the results of a survey about a group's film pitch presentation. According to the survey:
- Over half of the class felt the group communicated their idea clearly, while under half did not.
- The group needs to add more details about the story and ensure the audience understands better.
- Only one person thought the group was very professional and enthusiastic, so the group will need to change how they present themselves.
- The document discusses gathering feedback from a target audience of 12-30 year olds for a short film about a character undergoing chemotherapy.
- Pre-production, the filmmakers created an online questionnaire to understand how the audience felt about the title, narrative, and concept. Most respondents were 12-16 years old.
- Based on feedback, the filmmakers expanded the number of relatable characters.
- Post-production, another questionnaire gathered feedback on adjustments made. Social media was used to promote to the young adult audience.
- Receiving criticism of initial work helped improve ancillary materials and the film. The filmmaker incorporated feedback to create a stronger final product.
The document discusses the filmmakers' target audience research and feedback gathering process. Their target audience was males and females aged 12-30 based on the film's 12A rating. They created pre-production and post-production questionnaires to gather feedback on the title, narrative, characters, and overall film. Most respondents were aged 12-16, so they focused social media marketing on platforms popular with teenagers. Receiving and applying this audience feedback helped strengthen the film and ancillary materials.
The document summarizes feedback received from an audience survey about a film trailer. Key findings include:
- The majority of the audience was under 18, which matches the intended target age range of 15-24.
- Most respondents correctly identified the genre as horror or thriller.
- Opinions on the appropriate age rating were mixed, not clearly indicating a rating of 15 as intended.
- Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that the trailer title and music effectively conveyed the intended genre.
- While most found the trailer length suitable, some felt it was too short or long.
- Feedback will be used to improve character development and incorporate more of the narrative or plot in a future version.
The document summarizes feedback from an audience questionnaire about a documentary. Key findings include:
- Respondents generally rated the documentary highly in holding attention and having balanced sound.
- All respondents said they could relate to the documentary and found the expert interview extracts informative, despite being younger than the target age.
- Respondents also positively rated the double page article layout, use of conventions, and radio trailer.
- Feedback suggests minor improvements could be made to sound levels, color use, and including more extracts in the radio trailer. Overall though, the audience feedback was positive about how the documentary and supporting materials were put together.
The document summarizes the results of a questionnaire given to the target audience of a student film project. The questionnaire was used to evaluate how engaging and appealing the rough cut of the film was. It received positive feedback, with an average rating of 8.5/10 for how much audiences enjoyed it. The questionnaire also provided suggestions for audio improvements to make the viewing experience more immersive. Based on the feedback, the students made revisions to address issues like missing audio, unclear voices, and sudden stops in music. The final film is provided, along with some additional improvements the students would make, such as reducing background noise.
Bradley Homans learned from audience feedback in several ways:
1) Initial questionnaires found that social networking plays a large role in the lives of the target audience (ages 16-19), confirming their topic of "Social Networking: The Effect" was appropriate.
2) After creating a documentary and radio trailer, follow-up questionnaires found most of the target audience enjoyed and learned from the documentary (ratings of 9-10/10), and the music, voiceover, and variety of shots all worked effectively.
3) Feedback also confirmed the radio trailer and magazine article successfully promoted the documentary and linked the products together in a cohesive way.
The document summarizes feedback from an audience on a student's documentary, radio trailer, and TV guide about the effects of social media on education. Key findings include:
- The majority of audiences said they would continue watching the documentary and found the topic interesting. They also felt they learned from it.
- Audiences felt the documentary and radio trailer looked professional and had appropriate sound levels, though these could be improved.
- Music choice received mixed feedback but audiences understood the challenges in finding suitable music.
- Audiences said the most effective parts of the radio trailer were the facts and statistics.
- Audiences said the TV guide images and main heading would encourage them to read the article or watch
The document discusses the importance of receiving feedback from audiences to understand how a media product is received and whether it achieves its intended purpose. The author learned about audience feedback through research projects creating a magazine and movie trailer. Feedback was gathered from various sources, including a media studies teacher, classmates, friends/family, and online surveys, to get perspectives from different demographics. The author found feedback most helpful for improving aspects like visuals, sound, pacing, narrative clarity, and lighting in the movie trailer. Collecting feedback from multiple avenues helped the author tailor the media product to better achieve its goals.
From receiving audience feedback on various parts of the documentary and promotional materials, the documentarian learned several things:
1) The message and interviews came across clearly but some audio needed adjusting.
2) Simple, effective music choices worked well but some elements needed more refinement.
3) Expert interviews helped reinforce the topic but using a variety of experts would have provided more perspectives.
4) The magazine layout and design could have been improved with more planning and attention to conventions.
5) Including clips from the documentary in the radio trailer intrigued listeners but the music and sound levels required further work.
The document discusses feedback received from various sources on media products created by the author. Key learnings include:
- Feedback from a media studies teacher and classmates on initial drafts helped improve visuals, audio, pacing, and narrative clarity.
- Surveying college peers early on helped determine the general direction but feedback shifted the focus, like adding psychological elements.
- While feedback from a wide audience online could be useful, the author chose to focus on the intended target demographic.
This question asks us on how we met the needs of our audience. This is useful for any A2 Media Studies student who is doing their critical evaluation as part of the Advanced Portfolio.
The document summarizes feedback from audience members on a documentary about binge drinking. Key findings include:
1) Audience members felt the opening sequence effectively introduced the topic of binge drinking.
2) Most agreed there was a good balance of factual information without being overbearing.
3) All agreed the music fit well with the themes and transitions between "fun" and "fatal" sections were smooth.
4) Vox pops added humor that helped audiences relate while formal interviews provided useful facts.
5) A newspaper article and radio trailer promoting the documentary were both found to be eye-catching.
The document summarizes the filmmakers' process of gathering audience feedback through questionnaires to help guide their short film "A Truncated Parable of Complete Normality". They conducted initial online/video questionnaires before filming to inform their script, then further questionnaires after a rough cut and final cut to gauge audience understanding and suggestions. The feedback indicated a 12A rating and helped the filmmakers refine shots and music to better portray the themes and character. In the end, they felt the audience research was invaluable for making key decisions about the film.
The document discusses audience feedback received for a short film called "Saving Grace" about the dangers of drinking. It provides the following key points:
1. The filmmakers conducted research into their target audience of teenagers and students aged 15-30 before filming to understand how to craft the story and message.
2. They distributed questionnaires before and after filming to gather feedback on the synopsis and final film. This feedback suggested changing the music in one scene and adding more shots from the victim's perspective.
3. Each group member also conducted individual questionnaires with varying participants to validate the results. This feedback confirmed the main target audience was students and helped evaluate the film's reception among different age groups.
The feedback from various audiences on the documentary, radio trailer, and print ad was mostly positive but identified some key areas for improvement. Viewers praised the documentary's informative nature, framing, and professional quality, but noted issues with uneven sound levels. Feedback also suggested making cutaways longer and balancing arguments more. Most focus group members said the radio trailer was catchy and would persuade them to watch, though some did not listen to radio. Sound levels, particularly for voiceovers, needed improvement across formats.
Question 3 - What have you learned from your audience feedback?charl0tte
The focus group provided feedback on the documentary, radio trailer, and print advert. For the documentary, they praised the framing and found it informative, but said the sound levels needed improvement. Feedback on the radio trailer noted the catchy music but also sound level issues. Most would watch the documentary after seeing the print advert, though some found the image off-putting. Overall, the products worked well together but could be more professional, especially regarding uneven sound levels across all pieces.
What have you learnt from audience feedbacksgreenacre1992
The document summarizes feedback from a survey about a music video. Key findings include:
- Respondents generally rated the mise-en-scene, editing, and storyline positively but felt the camera work and acting could be improved.
- Most felt the video style matched the music genre and that the narrative was understandable.
- Favorite aspects were the editing, blood, and storyline. Least favorites included special effects, walking shots, and amount of blood.
- Most thought the video would help sell the song but some felt it was too scary. The introduction was seen as a good addition but could grow annoying upon repeat viewings.
Question 3 - What have you learned from your audience feedback?charl0tte
The focus group provided feedback on the documentary, radio trailer, and print advert. For the documentary, they praised the informative content but criticized uneven sound levels. The radio trailer was catchy but some felt it did not appeal to non-radio listeners. Most said the print advert was eye-catching though a few found the image off-putting. Overall, the products worked well together but could be improved by addressing sound issues and making the argument less one-sided.
The document summarizes feedback received from an audience questionnaire about a student-produced short film. Key findings include:
- Respondents correctly identified the film's genre as thriller and felt connected to the main character.
- The club scene and character abduction were most people's favorite parts.
- Editing was viewed as the strongest element of the film by most of the audience.
- Lighting and music were areas identified for possible improvement in a rough cut.
- The final cut addressed this feedback and received an average rating of 4 out of 5 from viewers.
The focus group provided helpful feedback on the documentary, article, and radio trailer. For the documentary, the opening sequence effectively set the topic and the music change was noticeable. Vox pops were comedic and relatable while serious interviews were informative. Both the student and parent wanted to watch more. For the article, images drew attention while facts and varied fonts engaged readers. The radio trailer used a mix of serious and comedic clips to tell the "fun or fatal" story effectively. Overall, the audience research validated that the key messages and tone were conveyed appropriately.
The document summarizes the results of a survey about a group's film pitch presentation. According to the survey:
- Over half of the class felt the group communicated their idea clearly, while under half did not.
- The group needs to add more details about the story and ensure the audience understands better.
- Only one person thought the group was very professional and enthusiastic, so the group will need to change how they present themselves.
- The document discusses gathering feedback from a target audience of 12-30 year olds for a short film about a character undergoing chemotherapy.
- Pre-production, the filmmakers created an online questionnaire to understand how the audience felt about the title, narrative, and concept. Most respondents were 12-16 years old.
- Based on feedback, the filmmakers expanded the number of relatable characters.
- Post-production, another questionnaire gathered feedback on adjustments made. Social media was used to promote to the young adult audience.
- Receiving criticism of initial work helped improve ancillary materials and the film. The filmmaker incorporated feedback to create a stronger final product.
The document discusses the filmmakers' target audience research and feedback gathering process. Their target audience was males and females aged 12-30 based on the film's 12A rating. They created pre-production and post-production questionnaires to gather feedback on the title, narrative, characters, and overall film. Most respondents were aged 12-16, so they focused social media marketing on platforms popular with teenagers. Receiving and applying this audience feedback helped strengthen the film and ancillary materials.
The document summarizes feedback received from an audience survey about a film trailer. Key findings include:
- The majority of the audience was under 18, which matches the intended target age range of 15-24.
- Most respondents correctly identified the genre as horror or thriller.
- Opinions on the appropriate age rating were mixed, not clearly indicating a rating of 15 as intended.
- Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that the trailer title and music effectively conveyed the intended genre.
- While most found the trailer length suitable, some felt it was too short or long.
- Feedback will be used to improve character development and incorporate more of the narrative or plot in a future version.
The document summarizes feedback from an audience questionnaire about a documentary. Key findings include:
- Respondents generally rated the documentary highly in holding attention and having balanced sound.
- All respondents said they could relate to the documentary and found the expert interview extracts informative, despite being younger than the target age.
- Respondents also positively rated the double page article layout, use of conventions, and radio trailer.
- Feedback suggests minor improvements could be made to sound levels, color use, and including more extracts in the radio trailer. Overall though, the audience feedback was positive about how the documentary and supporting materials were put together.
The document summarizes the results of a questionnaire given to the target audience of a student film project. The questionnaire was used to evaluate how engaging and appealing the rough cut of the film was. It received positive feedback, with an average rating of 8.5/10 for how much audiences enjoyed it. The questionnaire also provided suggestions for audio improvements to make the viewing experience more immersive. Based on the feedback, the students made revisions to address issues like missing audio, unclear voices, and sudden stops in music. The final film is provided, along with some additional improvements the students would make, such as reducing background noise.
Bradley Homans learned from audience feedback in several ways:
1) Initial questionnaires found that social networking plays a large role in the lives of the target audience (ages 16-19), confirming their topic of "Social Networking: The Effect" was appropriate.
2) After creating a documentary and radio trailer, follow-up questionnaires found most of the target audience enjoyed and learned from the documentary (ratings of 9-10/10), and the music, voiceover, and variety of shots all worked effectively.
3) Feedback also confirmed the radio trailer and magazine article successfully promoted the documentary and linked the products together in a cohesive way.
The document summarizes feedback from an audience on a student's documentary, radio trailer, and TV guide about the effects of social media on education. Key findings include:
- The majority of audiences said they would continue watching the documentary and found the topic interesting. They also felt they learned from it.
- Audiences felt the documentary and radio trailer looked professional and had appropriate sound levels, though these could be improved.
- Music choice received mixed feedback but audiences understood the challenges in finding suitable music.
- Audiences said the most effective parts of the radio trailer were the facts and statistics.
- Audiences said the TV guide images and main heading would encourage them to read the article or watch
The document summarizes audience feedback from questionnaires distributed during the planning and evaluation of a documentary project. The questionnaires provided information that helped shape the documentary, such as focusing on the topic of cannabis legalization and airing it on Channel 4 based on audience preferences. Feedback on the completed documentary, radio advertisement, and magazine spread was overwhelmingly positive, showing that the products achieved their goals of being informative, professional, and entertaining for the target audience. While the data from questionnaires was mostly quantitative, focus groups could have provided more qualitative insight. Minor issues like inconsistent sound levels and a few spelling errors were noted, but overall the audience feedback was very helpful for creating audience-focused and successful final products.
The document summarizes feedback from audience surveys about a documentary and related marketing materials. Key findings include:
- Audience feedback showed the documentary effectively conveyed the seriousness of body confidence issues, though some felt it lacked humor.
- Responses were mixed on whether enough facts/statistics were included in the documentary.
- Most respondents said they would recommend the documentary to others and felt the subject was relevant to the target audience.
- Feedback on marketing materials suggested improving image selection and shortening written content to better engage younger audiences.
The document discusses audience feedback received for a short horror film project. A questionnaire was administered to the target audience of teenagers aged 13-18. Feedback indicated that the film successfully conveyed the horror genre and created tension through mise-en-scene and sound specifically. Suggestions to improve lighting were also provided. The filmmakers acted on this feedback to refine their project according to the target audience's needs and expectations, demonstrating the importance of obtaining audience perspectives.
The document summarizes audience feedback from a documentary on bullying. It shows that:
- The facts presented helped audiences understand the problem and didn't overstate it.
- The opening reconstruction scene was most effective at engaging audiences and setting the serious tone.
- The narrator was clear and easy to understand, making her very engaging.
- On average, audiences rated the effectiveness of the documentary a 4 out of 5, showing room for improvement but overall professional quality.
The document summarizes the results of a questionnaire about a documentary on hobbies. Most respondents were female, aged 20 or under, and found the documentary, camera work, music, interviews and advertising to be interesting, appropriate and professionally produced. The topic of hobbies was also seen as interesting. The majority said they would want to watch the full documentary and thought the advertising linked together well. Some provided suggestions for improvements.
The document summarizes feedback from questionnaires given to the target audience of a documentary. The feedback showed that the documentary looked professional but some felt the sound quality was uneven. Most agreed they learned from the documentary and found the music and voiceover informative. The radio trailer and magazine effectively promoted the documentary and were aesthetically pleasing, though some felt improvements could be made to sound levels. Gaining audience perspective provided crucial feedback on how well the media products achieved their goals.
The document discusses audience feedback received for a short horror film project. A questionnaire was used to gather feedback from the target audience of 13-18 year olds. The feedback identified that the film successfully conveyed the horror genre but could have improved lighting. Scenes were re-shot with darker lighting as suggested. The audience feedback helped shape the project to better meet expectations and conventions of the horror genre. Receiving this feedback was important for improving the film and ensuring a quality final product.
This document contains the responses to a questionnaire about a documentary on exercises and methods to keep fit. It summarizes the following key points from the audience feedback:
- Most viewers were female, so getting more male responses would provide more balanced opinions.
- Viewers were mainly aged 16-19, so a wider age range could give more varied perspectives.
- 100% of viewers said they would be interested in watching the full documentary, showing the advertisements were successful.
- Feedback showed room for improving some aspects like the vox pops and title sequence, while interviews were generally well-received.
- Viewers indicated the documentary was informative but could have provided more facts in some areas.
- The survey results showed that audience research was very beneficial in guiding the creation of a media product that appeals to the target audience and other potential audiences. Post-production feedback also helped identify successful aspects and areas for improvement.
- Respondents generally found the documentary's information, interviews, and overall message to be high quality and effective at explaining the topic of mobile phones. Some minor improvements to audiovisual elements were suggested.
- The trailer was also successful in informing viewers about the documentary's purpose and making them want to watch through the use of interesting clips and sound bites. Feedback indicated the trailer and other media elements aligned well in quality and explaining the topic.
What have you learned from your audience feedbackgreenie101
The document discusses feedback received from audiences on three media projects: a radio trailer, TV listings magazine spread, and documentary.
Feedback on the radio trailer was positive, with 80% interested in the topic and finding the narrator exciting. Feedback on the TV listings spread found the text stood out and was eye-catching. The documentary focus group provided feedback that the interviews and visuals engaged them and the music suited the tone. Minor improvements were made based on feedback received.
The document summarizes the results of a questionnaire and online feedback the creator received about a music video. The feedback showed that most audiences enjoyed the video and thought the length was just right. The balloon scene was commonly cited as the favorite part, while a darker scene was seen as the weakest. Most felt the camera work, editing, genre, and costumes were effective. The feedback provided insights on how to improve future videos.
The document provides feedback from test audiences on a documentary and related promotional materials about social stereotypes.
Key points:
- 100% of viewers who saw a clip of the documentary said they would watch the full documentary.
- The target age range of 13-21 was deemed appropriate as most feedback aligned with this range.
- 58% of viewers said their ideas about social labels changed after watching, while 42% did not change their views.
The feedback was overwhelmingly positive about the professional quality of the documentary and promotional materials like the radio trailer. Minor suggested improvements included increasing the volume of the voiceover in some instances.
From audience feedback on their products, the respondent learned:
- Questionnaires provided vital information to create appropriate final products for their target audience.
- Feedback on finished products showed room for improvement in making the documentary more interesting and fast-paced to engage more viewers.
- The radio trailer was generally found enjoyable but could have been more professionally produced by focusing less on enjoyment and more on quality.
- While the TV listing achieved a very professional standard, being too professional may not be appropriate for their young target audience.
The feedback from friends on the music video was very positive. Most respondents were between 18-21 years old, which matches the target audience. Nobody rated the video lower than 5 out of 10 for enjoyment. Different parts of the video resonated with different people. 83.3% thought the video seemed professional. Responses to an open-ended question about the video made the creators very happy and proud. Most said everything was great, with some noting that text could have been better synced to the music. 72.2% said they would purchase the song/video, which was a great outcome.
The document discusses feedback received from an audience questionnaire about a documentary. Key points:
- The target audience that was aimed for matched the audience that responded to the questionnaire.
- Most respondents found the 5 minute extract appealing and engaging.
- A good percentage of the feedback was positive, and the documentary was successful at being informative and fitting the genre and target audience of the broadcast channel.
- Some areas for improvement were identified, such as including more content relevant to male viewers.
What have we learned from our audience feedbackMason Wills
The document provides feedback from focus groups on a documentary about the music industry. Overall, the feedback was very positive. For the documentary, respondents thought the introduction was engaging, there was enough background footage, the titles were interesting, and it was informative. They enjoyed the expert interviews and thought the music fit well. They also felt it seemed like a realistic documentary. The only criticism was that some vox-pops could be louder. Feedback on related promotional materials also identified minor improvements but was largely positive. The feedback validated many of the creative choices and identified a few small areas for improvement.
From audience feedback on their products, the respondent learned:
1) The majority of their audience found the documentary interesting and educational about mobile phones, though some felt it could be more engaging.
2) Feedback on the radio trailer was mostly positive, but it was not seen as very professional, suggesting more focus on quality over enjoyment is needed.
3) Audience responses to the layout of the TV listing were very positive, though some felt the style was too professional and not informal enough for their target demographic.
Similar to What have you learned from your audience feedback (1) (20)
Introductory analysis of tv documentariessamclark337
A documentary is a film or television program that provides information about a specific topic to audiences. Documentaries typically include actuality footage of real events or people, an exposition at the beginning to introduce the theme, interviews with people related to the topic, a voiceover narration, and different modes like poetic, expositional, observational, reflexive, and performative.
How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary textssamclark337
The combination of a documentary, magazine articles, and radio trailers effectively promotes and sells the documentary. The supporting media products use clips from the documentary to encourage viewers and listeners to watch it. The documentary focuses on raising awareness of fitness and health issues among teenagers and young adults aged 13-25 in Birmingham and surrounding areas. Both the documentary and supporting media were created to appeal to people from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds.
What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)samclark337
The document summarizes audience feedback from questionnaires about media products created by the author's group. 83% of respondents felt they learned something from the documentary, but there is room for improvement as 17% did not. Sound levels were inconsistent according to 77% of respondents. For the radio trailer, 72% said sound levels were not consistent throughout. However, 94% felt the magazine resembled a real life product. In the future, the author will focus on improving sound consistency based on this feedback.
How effective is the combination of your main product and ancillary textssamclark337
The combination of a documentary, magazine articles, and radio trailers effectively promotes and sells the documentary. The supporting media products use clips from the documentary to encourage viewers and listeners to watch it. The documentary focuses on raising awareness of fitness and health issues among teenagers and young adults aged 13-25 in Birmingham and surrounding areas. Both the documentary and supporting media were created to appeal to people from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds.
How did you use media technologies in thesamclark337
Sam Clark used various media technologies throughout the research, planning, filming, editing, and evaluation stages of producing a documentary, radio trailer, and magazine double page spread. These included using websites like BBC and YouTube for research, Final Cut Express and GarageBand for editing, and Word, PowerPoint, and Excel for presenting findings. Technology allowed for efficient research, high quality production through tools like professional cameras and microphones, and novel ways of sharing the final projects online.
In what ways does your media product usesamclark337
Our radio trailer uses conventions of real media in three key ways:
1) It includes a soft, mellow backing track to set the tone and allow the voiceover to be clearly heard, as is typical in real radio trailers.
2) It features a consistent professional narrator matching the documentary voice, to pass information accurately without mistakes.
3) It incorporates relevant audio clips from the documentary to attract listeners' interest while avoiding spoilers, as real radio trailers do.
What have you learned from your audience feedback (1)
1. What have you learned from your audience feedback?
In order to create a successful media product, it is essential to listen to the potential
audiences of the product and listen to their views of what they thought of the delivery of
the product and also what could be improved. In the research and planning tasks we used
questionnaires to gather the opinions about the potential ideas for the media products that
we had. To really utilise the questionnaire to its full potential, we ensured that all of the 18
people who took the questionnaire where within our age range.
Results for the documentary
Looking at the pie chart to the left, out of the
18 people asked, 83% of people said that they Did you learn anything
learned something from watching the
documentary, and 17% said they did not. from the documentary
Although this is a large proportion of people
that said yes, it is still indicating to me that
there is room for improvement. If 17% of the
people asked did not learn anything from the Yes
documentary, then that shows that the No
message of the documentary is not getting put
across properly, and that it is not totally
informative. Never the less, the documentary
we created had the desired outcome, to
deliver a factual report, and clearly, we done so.
The next important question that we
Did you feel that our wanted to find out was, did the viewer
feel that our documentary resembled a
documentary resembled a real life product? For this question, 94%
real life product? of the people asked said that it did, and
a small 6% said that it didn’t. Forgetting
the minority which said no, it is a great
result for the group that the viewers
Yes
thought our product resembled those of
No real life. This shows us that all of the
research and planning which we
conducted was worthwhile.
2. Moving on, the next set of questions we asked was more to find out about the quality of
the documentary. For example:
Out of all the questions asked, this
Did you find the sound gave the most negative answers. After
completing the documentary and
levels where consistant reviewing it several times, as a group,
throughout? we knew that the sound levels where
not perfect, and this view was also
shared by the actual viewers. With
only 23% of people asked saying they
Yes where consistent, with the remaining
No 77% saying otherwise. After evaluating
the answers given, I feel that this
Other
would be the most important area
when creating another documentary.
If we had to undertake this task again,
we could try to learn more as a group
about how to manage the sound levels better, so they are consistent throughout, so when
the question is asked again, we have a more positive outcome.
After looking at the group questionnaire results, I decided to conduct some of my own
independent research, and asked a few members of my family and close friends what they
thought about the documentary. I feel that this would secure a more honest view, from the
sort of people who would really be watching the documentary compared to my fellow peers
who may be influenced by the teacher or other group members.
After showing them the documentary several times, I asked the question, ‘What was the
best parts of the documentary and what where the key features that made it enjoyable for
you?’
After a wide range of answers I narrowed it down to some which where most important.
Some of the people asked said the camera shots used allowed the documentary to be
more enjoyable. This was a fantastic answer for me as we put a lot of effort into choosing
the right camera angles, for example, the blur shot which we used half way through the
documentary. Other answers I gained was that the voice over and backing track where
key points of the documentary as it set the tone for a serious, and factual documentary. Yet
the key answer given to me, which really shows that the hard work paid off, was that an
answer given was, the interviews where the highlight of the documentary. This is fantastic
3. for me because as a group we worked really hard to secure those interviews, which required
travelling to a local gym to interview a personal trainer.
After reviewing the results from the group questionnaire and my independent research I am
more than happy about the results which we gained. It shows that the hard work that we
put into the documentary as a group really paid off. However, if we were to ever undertake
this task again, I now know where some improvements could be made e.g. have more
consistent sound levels.
Results for the radio trailer.
Did you find the sound levels consistant
throughout?
Yes
No
Again, similarly to the documentary, we struggled with the sound levels. This had been
proved by 72% of people saying no to the question asked, and only 28% of people asked
saying yes. This is a negative result to us which we sourced the problem and found out the
solution. So if we ever have to create a radio trailer again, the sound levels can be improved.
The main reason for the problem is that we never pan centred the audio in final cut, this
was explained to us by our teacher after submitting the trailer.
4. Looking at the results displayed in the chart above. This being one of the key questions
asked, this is a very positive result for us. With 17 out of the 18 people asked saying yes, and
only one saying no, this really shows that the hard work we put into the trailer as a group
has paid off. The most important thing a radio trailer has to do is promote the product you
are offering, in our case, the documentary. Clearly, looking at these results, we have
succeeded.
After looking at the answers given in the questionnaire, again I decided to conduct some
independent research. By asking friends who are aged within our target audience, I found
out what their views are about the documentary, the main question I wanted to ask was,
did our radio trailer emulate one of real life. The answers given where of a wide variety,
here are some examples listed below:
‘Yes, as a consistent voice over was used’
‘partly yes and no, as the sound levels where not consistent
throughout’
‘Yes, as it included clips from the actual documentary’
The replies that were given where of a variety, but for the main question I asked, the same
answer seems to appear. That the sound levels where not consistent. We understand that
this is a common error for our group, and should we do the task again, would be the main
priority for improvement.
Magazine article results.
5. After putting a lot of thought into the
images we used, this result is great for us. It
Did you feel that the
shows us that the images where used images where good and
appropriately and to a good standard. To
the minority that said they were not, we used correctly?
could perhaps find out as to why they
thought this, for future improvement. Also,
as we were limited with the amount of
props to use for the images, as fitness and
Yes
health is a tricky topic to take pictures for, it
shows that we utilised what we had to best No
possible ability.
The final question asked which I shall be highlighting us, ‘Do you feel our magazine
resembled a real life product?’ As you can see the clear answer gives was ‘yes’. This is again
another fantastic result for the group as it shows we achieved the main goal. We worked so
hard as a group to try and emulate a real life product, so to receive a result like this is great.
Also, looking at the result, I feel that the research and planning which the group and I
carried out was to a high standard, and really helped in achieving this response.
To conclude, I feel that audience feedback is key in having a successful product, it has
allowed me to really understand what people thought of our work, and that it is to a good
standards. Besides the positives, it also highlights the negative areas of our work which
could be improved, so if we have to undertake this task again, we would know how to score
100% on every single question in the questionnaire.
6. After putting a lot of thought into the
images we used, this result is great for us. It
Did you feel that the
shows us that the images where used images where good and
appropriately and to a good standard. To
the minority that said they were not, we used correctly?
could perhaps find out as to why they
thought this, for future improvement. Also,
as we were limited with the amount of
props to use for the images, as fitness and
Yes
health is a tricky topic to take pictures for, it
shows that we utilised what we had to best No
possible ability.
The final question asked which I shall be highlighting us, ‘Do you feel our magazine
resembled a real life product?’ As you can see the clear answer gives was ‘yes’. This is again
another fantastic result for the group as it shows we achieved the main goal. We worked so
hard as a group to try and emulate a real life product, so to receive a result like this is great.
Also, looking at the result, I feel that the research and planning which the group and I
carried out was to a high standard, and really helped in achieving this response.
To conclude, I feel that audience feedback is key in having a successful product, it has
allowed me to really understand what people thought of our work, and that it is to a good
standards. Besides the positives, it also highlights the negative areas of our work which
could be improved, so if we have to undertake this task again, we would know how to score
100% on every single question in the questionnaire.