The document summarizes survey results from the University of Regina regarding online learning. It shows that between 2004-2014 enrollment increased from 547 to 4362 students and courses increased from 22 to 112. The survey found that most students were satisfied with their online courses, though some wanted faster responses from instructors. Flexibility of location and time was the most important factor for students choosing online courses. The majority of students preferred assessments that combined quizzes and assignments over a single final exam.
Blackboard not Blackbored: Engaging and enabling students in the Tertiary Ena...Blackboard APAC
The Tertiary Enabling Program (TEP) at Charles Darwin University is a semester long university preparation program for students unable to directly enter undergraduate study. With a cohort consisting of 80% of students studying online, Blackboard plays a central role in engaging and enabling TEP students with the necessary skills and knowledge for undergraduate study. To increase student engagement in TEP, a number of initiatives have been put in place this year designed to maximise the use of interactive digital technologies and changing pedagogies. One of the main drivers for these new initiatives was the analysis of data captured in Blackboard showing that early engagement by students increases their likelihood of successfully completing TEP as well as identifying critical points of engagement during the semester.
To maximise early engagement and prepare students for TEP studies, the first week of study for all new TEP students has been devoted to a new online initiative called TEP Start which is the focus of this presentation. TEP Start was specifically developed for the online learner to improve the student experience, build their confidence and give them the skills to succeed. TEP Start was developed with the expectation that students would engage and interact with the learning materials on Blackboard, thus moving away from the traditional method of ‘content based’ online learning. This online engagement includes classes hosted in Collaborate Ultra, game-based learning activities and short micro-lectures. Hosted on a dedicated Blackboard site, TEP Start was specifically developed using design principles such as colour coding, visual hierarchy, repetition, images, icons in addition to limited text; all to direct the student’s eye to what is important and to influence how they interact with the content.
The initial results of the TEP Start initiative are highly encouraging. The majority of students completed all components of TEP Start and the feedback from students and staff on TEP Start is overwhelmingly positive.
Blackboard not Blackbored: Engaging and enabling students in the Tertiary Ena...Blackboard APAC
The Tertiary Enabling Program (TEP) at Charles Darwin University is a semester long university preparation program for students unable to directly enter undergraduate study. With a cohort consisting of 80% of students studying online, Blackboard plays a central role in engaging and enabling TEP students with the necessary skills and knowledge for undergraduate study. To increase student engagement in TEP, a number of initiatives have been put in place this year designed to maximise the use of interactive digital technologies and changing pedagogies. One of the main drivers for these new initiatives was the analysis of data captured in Blackboard showing that early engagement by students increases their likelihood of successfully completing TEP as well as identifying critical points of engagement during the semester.
To maximise early engagement and prepare students for TEP studies, the first week of study for all new TEP students has been devoted to a new online initiative called TEP Start which is the focus of this presentation. TEP Start was specifically developed for the online learner to improve the student experience, build their confidence and give them the skills to succeed. TEP Start was developed with the expectation that students would engage and interact with the learning materials on Blackboard, thus moving away from the traditional method of ‘content based’ online learning. This online engagement includes classes hosted in Collaborate Ultra, game-based learning activities and short micro-lectures. Hosted on a dedicated Blackboard site, TEP Start was specifically developed using design principles such as colour coding, visual hierarchy, repetition, images, icons in addition to limited text; all to direct the student’s eye to what is important and to influence how they interact with the content.
The initial results of the TEP Start initiative are highly encouraging. The majority of students completed all components of TEP Start and the feedback from students and staff on TEP Start is overwhelmingly positive.
Presentation given on Dec 13, 2019 at DePaul University for the D2L Connection: Chicago Edition.
Creator and presenter: Barry Dahl, Teaching & Learning Advocate, D2L
Higher Education & Game Principles: Context, Theory & Application - Daniel La...Blackboard APAC
This presentation reports on the efficacy of a mobile learning intervention that combined ‘push notifications’ and game principles within a timed quiz app. An institutional interdisciplinary case study was conducted which compared rates of student retention and academic performance with their usage of a purpose-designed learning app. Leading up to lectures the app pushed daily quizzes to students’ personal mobile devices and then rewarded them with feedback, points, badges and a position on a leaderboard. During this session, the findings of this study will be discussed and conclusions made in regards to what findings mean for the future research into higher education learning enabled via mobile app technologies.
Leveraging learning technologies to support Indigenous postgraduate students ...Blackboard APAC
Professor Adrian Miller is the Pro Vice-Chancellor of Indigenous Leadership at Charles Darwin University. Prior to this role, he was the Academic Director of Indigenous Education and Research at Griffith University in Brisbane where he managed Indigenous education and research activities, and policy and strategy development and implementation.
Professor Miller has made significant contributions to Indigenous health and education. This has been achieved through successful competitive and non-competitive research grants, publication outputs, long-term Indigenous community engagement and public policy development. Research capacity development has been a primary focus for these research activities, which has led to positive outcomes for Indigenous community members and organisations. The highly collaborative manner in which he has undertaken research has contributed to intellectual and methodological development in these fields. He has a strong interest in applied and translational research and twice been awarded Australian College of Educators Teaching Award.
Professor Miller has undertaken leadership roles in community-based and government committees to advocate the views of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families.
Leveraging D2L to Create an Online Learning CommunityD2L Barry
Leveraging D2L to Create an Online Learning Community to Empower and Connect Learners and Faculty (11am–11:45am ET)
Presenter: Stacy Southerland, PhD, University of Central Oklahoma
D2L Connection: Worldwide Edition
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Totally Online
Online Tests: Filling in the Gaps | Mary-Ann Shuker & Dr Suzzanne Owen - Grif...Blackboard APAC
Blackboard online tests are powerful, with multiple settings and multiple question types. So often test are created with only two question types - multiple choice and short answer - with the majority testing recall only. Academics are often confused or simply unaware of all the settings and steps in administering tests. We present a tool developed to: engage academics with the full range of automatically marking question types; explain how to create higher order thinking questions; and expose them to the full workflow of online test capabilities. This tool can be used in a class or as self-directed learning. Finally we share statistics and feedback on its success and a tricky method for enticing busy academics to fully engage in a class for two hours.
TLC2016 - Data for Students - A student-centred approach to analytics in LearnBlackboardEMEA
Presenter: Ross Ward
Organisation: The University of Edinburgh
Description: Learning analytics is primarily focused on staff accessing student data to gauge performance, predict student outcomes, and make interventions where necessary. This session will provide an overview of the work that the University has done in researching and developing a bespoke learning analytics building block called, ‘Data for Students’ that allows students to access information about their course - using click counts and comparison of grades against the cohort. The session will report on the outputs of our initial pilot studies and feedback from staff and students who have used the tool.
Small Signposts: Small Practices that Make a Big Impact for Instructors and S...D2L Barry
Small Signposts: Small Practices that Make a Big Impact for Instructors and Students (2pm–2:20pm ET)
Presenter: Pam Whitehouse, Tennessee Board of Regents
D2L Connection: Worldwide Edition
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Totally Online
Blending the Tutor Lounge: using Blackboard to develop tutors - Sonya McIlroy...Blackboard APAC
At Academic Colleges Group Tertiary & Careers (TCG), we recognise the importance of student-centred, innovative classes across a wide variety of vocational programmes. Therefore, there has been concerted effort put into providing engaging lessons in a blended environment.
This presentation will be of interest to those who are supporting tutors to deliver engaging lessons and implementing change in methodology to include technology in a face to face environment. During our session, we will unpack the threefold functions of the Tutor Lounge as described above, and share our experiences of tutor uptake. We will give participants the opportunity to see how we structured our development area in Blackboard, as well as ask questions and discuss strategies to overcome/implement possible issues.
Presentation given on Dec 13, 2019 at DePaul University for the D2L Connection: Chicago Edition.
Creator and presenter: Barry Dahl, Teaching & Learning Advocate, D2L
Higher Education & Game Principles: Context, Theory & Application - Daniel La...Blackboard APAC
This presentation reports on the efficacy of a mobile learning intervention that combined ‘push notifications’ and game principles within a timed quiz app. An institutional interdisciplinary case study was conducted which compared rates of student retention and academic performance with their usage of a purpose-designed learning app. Leading up to lectures the app pushed daily quizzes to students’ personal mobile devices and then rewarded them with feedback, points, badges and a position on a leaderboard. During this session, the findings of this study will be discussed and conclusions made in regards to what findings mean for the future research into higher education learning enabled via mobile app technologies.
Leveraging learning technologies to support Indigenous postgraduate students ...Blackboard APAC
Professor Adrian Miller is the Pro Vice-Chancellor of Indigenous Leadership at Charles Darwin University. Prior to this role, he was the Academic Director of Indigenous Education and Research at Griffith University in Brisbane where he managed Indigenous education and research activities, and policy and strategy development and implementation.
Professor Miller has made significant contributions to Indigenous health and education. This has been achieved through successful competitive and non-competitive research grants, publication outputs, long-term Indigenous community engagement and public policy development. Research capacity development has been a primary focus for these research activities, which has led to positive outcomes for Indigenous community members and organisations. The highly collaborative manner in which he has undertaken research has contributed to intellectual and methodological development in these fields. He has a strong interest in applied and translational research and twice been awarded Australian College of Educators Teaching Award.
Professor Miller has undertaken leadership roles in community-based and government committees to advocate the views of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families.
Leveraging D2L to Create an Online Learning CommunityD2L Barry
Leveraging D2L to Create an Online Learning Community to Empower and Connect Learners and Faculty (11am–11:45am ET)
Presenter: Stacy Southerland, PhD, University of Central Oklahoma
D2L Connection: Worldwide Edition
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Totally Online
Online Tests: Filling in the Gaps | Mary-Ann Shuker & Dr Suzzanne Owen - Grif...Blackboard APAC
Blackboard online tests are powerful, with multiple settings and multiple question types. So often test are created with only two question types - multiple choice and short answer - with the majority testing recall only. Academics are often confused or simply unaware of all the settings and steps in administering tests. We present a tool developed to: engage academics with the full range of automatically marking question types; explain how to create higher order thinking questions; and expose them to the full workflow of online test capabilities. This tool can be used in a class or as self-directed learning. Finally we share statistics and feedback on its success and a tricky method for enticing busy academics to fully engage in a class for two hours.
TLC2016 - Data for Students - A student-centred approach to analytics in LearnBlackboardEMEA
Presenter: Ross Ward
Organisation: The University of Edinburgh
Description: Learning analytics is primarily focused on staff accessing student data to gauge performance, predict student outcomes, and make interventions where necessary. This session will provide an overview of the work that the University has done in researching and developing a bespoke learning analytics building block called, ‘Data for Students’ that allows students to access information about their course - using click counts and comparison of grades against the cohort. The session will report on the outputs of our initial pilot studies and feedback from staff and students who have used the tool.
Small Signposts: Small Practices that Make a Big Impact for Instructors and S...D2L Barry
Small Signposts: Small Practices that Make a Big Impact for Instructors and Students (2pm–2:20pm ET)
Presenter: Pam Whitehouse, Tennessee Board of Regents
D2L Connection: Worldwide Edition
Wednesday, January 8, 2020
Totally Online
Blending the Tutor Lounge: using Blackboard to develop tutors - Sonya McIlroy...Blackboard APAC
At Academic Colleges Group Tertiary & Careers (TCG), we recognise the importance of student-centred, innovative classes across a wide variety of vocational programmes. Therefore, there has been concerted effort put into providing engaging lessons in a blended environment.
This presentation will be of interest to those who are supporting tutors to deliver engaging lessons and implementing change in methodology to include technology in a face to face environment. During our session, we will unpack the threefold functions of the Tutor Lounge as described above, and share our experiences of tutor uptake. We will give participants the opportunity to see how we structured our development area in Blackboard, as well as ask questions and discuss strategies to overcome/implement possible issues.
Dcla13 discourse, computation and context – sociocultural dclaSimon Knight
My DCLA13 talk at LAK13 in Leuven. The images should all be CC licensed with links provided in the speaker notes on the slides.
I'd recommend looking at the other slides from this session (see http://www.solaresearch.org/events/lak/lak13/dcla13/ ) particularly those on context - this presentation provides a theoretical perspective on context, which some of the other presentations were showing really interesting examples of in empirical (and well theorised) work.
DCLA meet CIDA: Collective Intelligence Deliberation Analytics Simon Buckingham Shum
DCLA14: 2nd International Workshop on Discourse-Centric Learning Analyticsat LAK14: http://dcla14.wordpress.com
Abstract: This discussion paper builds a bridge between Discourse-Centric Learning Analytics (DCLA), whose focus tends to be on student discourse in formal educational contexts, and research and practice in Collective Intelligence Deliberation Analytics (CIDA), which seeks to scaffold quality deliberation in teams/collectives devising solutions to complex problems. CIDA research aims to equip networked communities with deliberation platforms capable of hosting large scale, reflective conversations, and actively feeding back to participants and moderators the ‘vital signs’ of the community and the state of its deliberations. CIDA tends to focus not on formal educational communities, although many would consider themselves learning communities in the broader sense, as they recognize the need to pool collective intelligence in order to understand, and co-evolve solutions to, complex dilemmas. We propose that the context and rationale behind CIDA efforts, and emerging CIDA implementations, contribute a research and technology stream to the DCLA community. The argument is twofold: (i) The context of CIDA work connects with the growing recognition in educational thinking that students from school age upwards should be given the opportunities to engage in authentic learning challenges, wrestling with problems and engaging in practices increasingly close to the complexity they will confront when they graduate. (ii) In the contexts of both DCLA and CIDA, different kinds of users need feedback on the state of the debate, and the quality of the conversation: the students and educators served by DCLA are mirrored by the citizens and facilitators served by CIDA. In principle, therefore, a fruitful dialogue could unfold between DCLA/CIDA researchers and practitioners, in order to better understand common and distinctive requirements.
Creative Classroom Communication: Comparing online vs face-to-faceBindi Clements
Specific pedagogical challenges arise when teaching languages online, particularly in relation to promoting conditions for speaking practice. This research compares student and teacher experience online and face-to-face, specifically exploring the opportunities for spontaneous student communication. The results are relevant for both online teachers the design of online language class material.
Online Education: Where Benefits Outweigh ChallengesLinda Oestreich
Slides to accompany STC Summit presentation for Wednesday, 24 June 2015. Discuss class formats, academic analysis and metrics, and case history of presenter's experience moving from standup instructor to virtual one.
Communicating in the digital classroom: Comparing experiences online and face...Bindi Clements
Language classes held online in a ‘digital’ classroom provide opportunities for bringing together teachers and students from different locations and cultures, and online classes allow for language practice outside the traditional face-to-face classroom setting. However, significant pedagogical challenges arise when using videoconferencing for language teaching, particularly in terms of enabling spontaneous communication between learners. It can be difficult to ensure that all students are engaged and have opportunities for speaking practice, and for teachers to assess the progress of individual learners.
This research investigates some of these challenges in the context of classes provided to adult language learners. Wall Street English students follow a blended programme, combining self-paced online study with teacher-led classes. Some students can choose to attend these teacher-led classes either face-to-face or online, and as both modes use almost identical class content, this allows for the direct comparison of digital and face-to-face classrooms. Using questionnaire and interview data, this research compares student and teacher experience in both modes. In addition, as students are assessed during the classes, the numeric data provided by teacher assessment of students’ language, communication and interaction skills will be analysed and compared. In particular, the hypothesis that students have fewer opportunities to demonstrate their language skills, and the impact this has on assessment, will be investigated.
The results will be relevant for online teachers, teacher trainers and course designers, and will highlight the importance of awareness of the affordances for learner interactivity offered by the digital classroom. The conclusion is that teachers will need to develop specific skills in order for learners to engage with and fully participate in online classes, and class materials should be developed with a range of opportunities for online interaction in mind.
Take a look at how Cheadle and Marple prepared to make the switch to Moodlerooms. It will visit what was successful and why, results from student feedback on the project ad what happens next. It will also share insight into how their innovative teaching techniques encourage their students to better engage with their LMS.
Heads in the Cloud - How are content strategies evolving in the workplace? (...Brightwave Group
http://www.brightwave.co.uk/debate
This passionate debate, was originally hosted by Brightwave at Learning Technologies Exhibition on Wednesday 25th January 2012.
Chaired by Donald H Taylor, it utilised live voting technology, to investigate how organisations can exploit technology and make learning content and resources effective at the point of need, focusing on how content strategies are evolving to support the level of workplace performance we need right now and in the future
.Find out how the live audience voted…
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
6. 1. Demographics
-- how are we doing overall?
2. Mobile devices
3. Expectations
4. Major assessments
5. Motivation to learn
6. Why choose online?
7. Learning preferences
18. available to answer questions within 24 hours
54%
approachable and offers multiple ways to connect
respond but timing could be better (within 48)
45%
26%
frustrating and always late with responses (after 48)
instructor did not engage in my online course at all
I feel uncomfortable asking questions, so I don’t ask
12%
9%
7%
28. What is UR Courses Mobile NOT Effective at doing?
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Email
Reading Discussion Forums
Accessing Readings
Reading Course Content
Posting to Discussions
Accessing PDF Documents
Accessing Videos
Accessing PowerPoint
Completing Quizzes
Submitting Assignments
29.
30.
31.
32.
33. 12%
18%
29% 9%
4%
11%
11%
2% 4%
Harder than a face-to-face course
A course with defined start and
end dates
Self-paced - a course where
you can start and finish when
you want
Personalized learning with opportunities
to choose what you will do with little or
no interaction with others
Fully interactive and collaborative (i.e.
with student-to-student interaction and
instructor-to-student interaction)
A course that follows a weekly schedule
Other: Please specify
34.
35. 58% selected: “In lieu of a final
exam, a combination of quizzes
and assignments.”
36. Several graded quizzes
48%
One final exam
15%
In lieu of a final exam a combination
of quizzes and assignments
58%
Major individual project
27%
Term paper
36%
Team presentation
4%
37. “We must find ways to get our
students to use and practice over
time the new course material that
we ask them to learn. Traditional
methods of letting students listen
passively to lectures and then use a
short burst of intensive study to
cram for a test ...does not result in
students forming new neural
networks” (p. 19). Terry Doyle (2012)
38. “By definition, a teaching approach
that allows for cramming fails to
meet the definition of learning.
Cramming results in a hollow victory
for students. They often earn a
passing grade but they are unable to
recall or use most of the information
even a week later” (Bjor, 1994; Ebbinghaus,
1913) (p. 20).
Terry Doyle (2012)
39.
40.
41. Grades
66%
Apply knowledge to real world
Choice of assignments
Timely feedback
Participation by instructor
Engaging with other students
74%
42%
46%
37%
28%
50. Michelle van Ginneken
michelle.vanGinneken@uregina.ca
Darrel Lawlor
Darrel.lawlor@uregina.ca
Editor's Notes
Darrel/Michelle slide: introductions
In this session we will show results from an electronic survey that was completed by online students at the University of Regina and we will compare our assumptions and practices to what students say and wherever possible show related research that backs up our findings.
So the first question is: Do we really know what we think we know?
Educators often think they know what is best for their students but then, when you talk to students, you find the opposite. When we hear from students themselves, what we think can be at odds with the reality of the student experience.
MV – learning can be uncomfortable (like a really hard chair with a tack in it)
What motivates students to learn?
Are students motivated by grades or something else?
Who are our online students?
Why do they take online courses?
What are they doing with their mobile devices?
What do they have to say about their online learning experiences?
Are there areas of contradiction between our practices as educators and student habits?
Are there identifiable themes that we can use to improve how we teach?
What should, or could, we be doing differently?
Are there things we do to help students that actually drive them to crazy?
Michelle slide
Centre for Continuing Education, more specifically ‘Flexible Learning Division’
This fall we ran 34 online courses with 1332 enrolments
Average enrolment is 39 students
We are a cost-recovery unit which offers several delivery methods:
Fully online,
Blended
Televised
F2F at Saskatchewan Regional Colleges
Evenings
Weekends
& Summer courses
We have 6 FTE & 3 part-time instructional designers. 2 dedicated to the Faculty of Nursing & 1 at First Nations University of Canada
We currently use Moodle as our Learning Management System for our online courses - called ‘URCourses’ .
Michelle slide
Then
2004 we ran 22 online course with 547 enrolments
2014 we ran 112 online course with 4362 enrolments
Darrel slide
Year 1 we held focus groups
Year 2 we held focus groups
Year 3 we conducted a survey based on the themes arising from years prior
Michelle slide
We chose an open ended question for Y1 & Y2 student focus groups.
used the feedback gathered to develop a survey
In this session we’ll examine student feedback with an eye for revealing discrepancies between what we think and what students know.
Darrel Slide
A coop student – a fourth-year Arts student majoring in English, named Ben Woolhead – looked at the data and put the basic findings into nice charts that we could use. With the help of our coop student, Ben Woolhead, we broke the results of the survey into 7 focus areas:
1. Demographics of survey participants (michelle) -- and we will look at how we’re doing overall
2. Mobile devices & their usage (Michelle)
3. Student expectations
4. Major Assessments
5. Motivation to learn
6. Why choose online?
7. Learning preferences.
We begin with the demographics of our survey participants to see if we have a fair representation.
Michelle slide
One full year of online students were sent the survey – 1234 individual students
454 responded
38%
Overwhelmingly female responses 81%
institutionally we have about 60% female
Michelle slide
About 50% are 18-24
Other 50% were varying ages - 25 and over
Our participants have mostly taken 1 (36%) or 4+ (26%) online courses
We had a balanced amount of students from all 10 Faculties.
½ our students stated they were Y1 & Y2 within their studies. This may not be a true reflection but rather a result of most of our online offerings fall within introductory & 2nd year courses.
Michelle slide
22% were from a rural area
16% were from an urban area that was not Regina
54% were from Regina.
8% were from other locations (such as?)
Michelle slide
36% of respondents had taken 1 online course
And 26% had taken 4 or more online courses.
And we had a balanced amount of students from all 10 Faculties.
½ our students stated they were Y1 & Y2 within their studies.
Please note that this may not be a true reflection of our student body, but a result of most of how our online offerings are mostly within the introductory 100 and second year 200 level courses.
So, now we have a fairly good idea of who the students who completed this survey were. Let’s move to the real heart of the data.
Darrel slide
Interestingly enough, 6% of our participants didn't realize they had registered for an online course!
The U of R registration system does not provide easy to course searching for online, blended and non-traditional courses, Visually, there isnt any cues to distinguish. Just the word web in the room # area.
Darrel slide
50% said it doesn’t matter
Darrel slide
Do you prefer to take an online course in the Spring, Summer, Fall or Winter?
Over 50% percent didn’t have a preference and choice ‘It Doesn’t Matter’.
And Spring Summer only account for 6%. The desire is not there for the summer months.
Ironically, these are our highest enrolment terms.
Sometimes students are forced to take classes during this time as there are not other face-to-face offerings during this time. Faculties do not like online competing with face-to-face.
Michelle slide
We chose an open ended question for Y1 & Y2 student focus groups.
used the feedback gathered to develop a survey
In this session we’ll examine student feedback with an eye for revealing discrepancies between what we think and what students know.
Darrel slide
66% of students have never travelled to our website for information, online course lists, or preparatory course documents.
Darrel Slide
54% were Satisfied
33% were somewhat satisfied
7% were somewhat dissatisfied
6% were dissatisfied
So, one could say, based on this survey at least, we’re doing not bad. Pretty good. Room for improvement for the 13% dissatisfied.
Michelle slide
This question pertains to online instructors. We’ve identified as a best practice the critical importance of the interaction of the instructor with the student. So, how are we doing?
Your experience with online instructors has been...
Michelle slide
They are often available when I have questions in the course (within 24 hours) – 54%
They are approachable and offer multiple ways to connect if questions arise – 45%
They respond to questions but the timing could be better (within 48 hours) – 26%
I find them frustrating and always late with responses (after 48 hours) – 12%
My instructor did not seem to engage in my online course at all – 9%
I feel uncomfortable asking questions, so I don’t ask the instructor questions – 7%
Darrel slide
How important is it for you to have an engaged instructor (or Teaching Assistant)?
Darrel slide
Very important to most. The people who don’t care so much wanted a self-directed course. Incidentally, 6 % of respondents wanted a self-directed online course.
SUMMARY: 38.9% of the people who thought that an engaged instructor was NOT IMPORTANT expected a self-directed course (compare to 29% out of everyone expected self-directed). Same with Somewhat Important answerers (37.9%).
Michelle slide
Question: Overall, was your instructor proficient in UR Courses?
Michelle slide
A fairly good response – looks like only a handful of people found their instructor had difficulties with UR Courses. Unfortunately, judging from comments (throughout the survey), there are a few very bad online instructors.
Darrel slide
Darrel slide
76% of those surveyed do at least sometimes actively seek out fully online courses. Interestingly, that leaves almost a quarter of respondents saying they never seek out online courses. Incidentally, in a related question we found that very few students actually go to the Flexible Learning Division web site within CCE to find information about online courses. The main source continues to be UR Self Service.
Michelle slide
What mobile devices are students using?
Michelle slide
No surprises. iPhone, android phone and iPad are the main mobile devices used by students.
Michelle slide
Email, reading forums, posting in forums, accessing readings.
Further to this we found that we do a pretty good job with email and forums.
But, we were most interested in areas that we’re not doing a good job.
Michelle slide
According to students UR Courses is not effective for submitting assignments, completing quizzes, accessing powerpoints, accessing videos, accessing PDF documents, posting discussions, reading content. What does this mean? This may not be of huge concern because students already said they are not in the habit of doing these things with their mobile devices but, nevertheless, we should make students aware of what Mobile devices are good at and not so good at.
Mobile is less on our radar now because the upgraded Moodle we now have adjusts to mobile formats.
Darrel slide
Let’s take a look at student expectations.
What percentage of students thought that online would be easier than face to face?
Darrel slide
12% thought online would be easier than face to face
Michelle slide
What percentage of students thought online would be harder than face to face?
Michelle slide
18% thought online would be harder than face to face but that’s just part of the story.
Let’s dig into student expectations.
Darrel/michelle slide
It seems that students aren’t quite sure what to expect when they sign up to study online. It’s a gamble. They told us that in in our face to dace focus group discussions as well. Seems students aren’t sure what to think about online courses.
We do our best to inform them but students really won’t know what to expect because A) not all online courses are the same and B) you can provide orientations but until you actually take an online course, you’re not sure what it is.
Let’s stop for a moment to consider what this all means. Let’s explode the ideas presented in this graph to see where it takes us. Let’s tease with some ideas and unpack the data. There’s a lot to think about here.
11% of students thought that online would be “Personalized learning with opportunities to choose what you will do with little or no interaction with others” AND very few students - 4% - expected online learning to be interactive and collaborative and yet, we like to think that they are. We focus on collaboration and communication between and among students when we design online courses BUT that’s not what students expect or want, at least according to our focus group conversations. If we think that courses should be collaborative, why don’t students? To me the biggest factor here is the notion by students that courses are “Self-paced.” 29% of students expected their online course to be self-paced and they could start and finish when they wanted. 29% said that. Why would they think that? What does our division name do to that notion. We’re the Flexible learning division. This isn’t to say that we should give what students expect, but would it help students to know what to expect. They walk into a face-to-face classroom and they have a pretty clear idea of what to expect. Students have consistently told us that forums and workload are problematic for them. Is pacing something we should be more aware of?
(4% no answer 2% other)
Michelle slide
Let’s look at how students want to be assessed.
We asked: What is your preference for major assessment in online courses?
What do you think is the number one way students would like to be assessed?
Michelle slide
58% selected “In lieu of a final exam, a combination of quizzes and assignments.”
What other forms of assessment are preferred?
Michelle slide
Alrighty then - as we go through this, I want you to think about what your practice is as an educator and what we do as institutions to assess our students. Does what we do relate to what we know about how people learn?
What percentage of students said they’d like “Several graded quizzes”?
What percentage of students said “One final exam”? What do you think? Why do we have one final exam? Is it the best way for students to learn?
In lieu of a final exam a combination of quizzes and assignments
Major individual project
Term paper
Team presentation
The least favourite options: Team presentation and One final exam.
Some of the comments included: “not group projects (especially those requiring meeting); difficult to write in-person finals for some students.”
DL:
How does the student preference for, in lieu of a final exam, a combination of quizzes and multiple assignments” compare with current research into the brain and how people learn.
Darrel slide
Terry Doyle - pictured here speaking to Faculty on April 18, 2012 – said, in his book Learner-centered teaching Putting the research on learning into practice:
Permit me to read the quote, ““We must find ways to get our students to use and practice over time the new course material that we ask them to learn. Traditional methods of letting students listen passively to lectures and then use a short burst of intensive study to cram for a test ...does not result in students forming new neural networks” (p. 19). In other words, big all inclusive final exams are not the way to go if you want students to remember what they cram into their brain.
He further said,
Image source: http://www.stanly.edu/news/headlines/1178-dr-terry-doyle-speaks-at-scc.html
Darrel slide
“By definition, a teaching approach that allows for cramming fails to meet the definition of learning.
Cramming results in a hollow victory for students. They often earn a passing grade but they are unable to recall or use most of the information
even a week later”
MV:
Scaffolding assignments to mitigate.
Image source: http://www.stanly.edu/news/headlines/1178-dr-terry-doyle-speaks-at-scc.html
Michelle slide
How does the above finding relate to student motivation? We asked students “What motivates you to learn?”
Michelle slide
Grades?
Applying knowledge to real world ?
Having a choice of assignments
Timely feedback
Participation by instructor
Engaging with other students
Other 2%
So, what is the #1 thing that motivates students (at least, according to this survey)? Applying knowledge to real world situations. How does that relate to our means of major assessment?
The Highest response: Applying knowledge to real world situations. Interesting note: all first and second year students answered this way. Lowest answer: Engaging with other students. Other responses: graduation; finishing degree. (Forums take time. Forum complaints came up in focus groups.) AND YET, WE CONTINUE TO MAKE FORUMS SO IMPORTANT. In the focus groups of the past students consistently said that they often learn anything in the forums. They just go through the motions to satisfy course requirements. Students frequently say they are more interested in what the instructor has to say than other students.
Darrel slide
Do you find participation in mandatory discussion forums a valuable way to learn?
Darrel slide
People are kind of on the fence here. By the numbers, most did feel that the forums were at least somewhat valuable, but the 59 comments tell a different tale.
Almost every single comment was some sort of complaint or bad review about discussion forums.
MV:
- Question why you have a weekly forum (less is more)
Major concerns:
lack of participation;
too much participation (hard to keep up/read all posts);
often one real answer – first to posts gets the best marks;
not enough instructor participation (here to learn from instructors, not students);
forced discussion leads to tailored answers and discussions to please the instructor/get marks;
can be time consuming for very little benefit.
Michelle slide
Do you find participation in quizzes a valuable way to learn?
MV Slide
Interestingly enough, the answers for this question are similar to those concerning forums. Some comments: if answers are given, then yes (seems obvious that answers should be given); don’t waste time on something not worth marks; depends on type of course.
Darrel slide
Why did you choose to take a course online?
Darrel slide
Not surprisingly 75% selected “Flexibility of location and time.”
What other forms of assessment are preferred?
MV slide
If you could choose how to best learn course material, what methods would you choose? (check all that apply)
Michelle & Darrel slide
Interestingly enough, the answers for this question are similar to those concerning forums.
Some comments: if answers are given, then yes (seems obvious that answers should be given); don’t waste time on something not worth marks; depends on type of course.
What alternate things are you doing – in terms of quizzes - in online courses?
MV
Importance is to have variety. (HERE IT SEE IT VIDEO)
MV slide
If you could choose how to best learn course material, what methods would you choose? (check all that apply)