VILLAGE STAKEHOLDER FORMAT FOR COLLECTING INFORMATION FROM FARMERS

1. CBGMS Study Village Information - FGD
Men Women Total Men Women Total
1
2
3
2
1 No of meetings per month
Men Women SC/ST
Collective Polarised
3 Function of BUA(tick)
1 Meetings
2 Record maintenance
3 Participatory Hydrological monitoring
4
Source of Information regarding agriculture
production and management
1 Agriculture officer
2 Local NGO
3 TV/Films
4 Radio
5 Newspaper / Magazine
6 News Letter
7 Wall writings
8 Wall Magazine
9 Pamphlets
10 Meetings
11 Awareness programmes
12 Work shops
13 Any other
Remarks
DescriptionSl No
Remarks
Reasons
BUA meetings
BUA Name and Date of formation1
VILLAGE INFORMATION ------FOCUSED GROUP DISCUSSION
No. of farmers BUA Executive Committee
Village ------------------------------ G.P--------------------Mandal ---------------------------------- District -----------------------------------
Details of BUA
Participation2
Decision Making Process3
Very good Poor RemarksAverageGood
AFPRO, Hyderabad 1 of 6

2. CBGMS Study Village Information - FGD
5-A
( Ground water contamination and its impact)
if yes percentage affected ( )
Low Medium severe
5-B Water Quality for irrigation
Quality Soft Hard Alkaline
% affected
No. / Type % area / no of
farmers under
the practice
No. / Type % area / no of
farmers under
the practice
No. / Type % area / no of
farmers under
the practice
1
Cropping Pattern (3 Major crops) and
Area cultivated
a
b
c
2 Crop Yields(Qtls./ac)(3 Major crops)
a
b
c
3
Average utilisation of chemical fertilisers
(kgs/ acre)- (3 Major crops)
a
b
c
4
Average utilisation of chemical Pesticides
(lts/kg./ acre) (3 Major crops)
a
b
c
5 Total Irrigated area (ac)
6
Application of Farm Yard Manure
(tonnes/acre)
7 Application of bio pesticides (Lts/accre)
8 Common Pool of Resources (CPR)
a Grazing Land
b
Forest area (acres) - (Revenue / Reserve)-
raod margins / tank beds
9 Type of Irrigation sources
% functioning % functioning % functioning
a Tank
b Dug / open wells
c Borewells
6 Functioning of borewells
No.
1 All the time
2 Part of the year
3 Not functioning
Total
Description
8 Agriculture
Sl.No
20 years ago ( Before 1986)
Is there any Fluoride problem in drinking water Yes/No -
Remarks
Remarks
10 years ago ( Before 1996) At Present
Percentage
AFPRO, Hyderabad 2 of 6

3. CBGMS Study Village Information - FGD
7
Problems Priority
1 Insufficiency of water
2 Low voltage
3 Irregular timings of power supply
4 Limited hours of power supply
5 Lack of recharge structures
6 Low rainfall
7 Overexploitation
8 Others
9
S.No
Intervention
1 Borewell
2 Micro irrigation (Drip/Sprinkler)
3 Maize
4 Cotton
5 Paddy(SRI)
6 Vegetables
7 Horticulture
8 Floriculture
9 Vermicompost
10 Bio pesticides
11 Seed production
12 Any other
10 Observations
a Involvement of community beyond the project period
b Are there any conflicts or constraints?
c APWELL Institutions relationships with existing village level Institutions
RemarksYear of starting
Introduction of New Technologies in the Village
Year of ending
Remarks
Borewell problems --- Ranking 1 (High priority) to 5 (Least priority)
AFPRO, Hyderabad 3 of 6

4. CBGMS Study Village Information - FGD
11- A Income is improved due to:
Sl No. Details Yes/No
1 Availability of Quality seed
2 Practice of improved technology
3 Change in cropping pattern
4 Availability of extension services
5 Input costs
6 Market facility
7 Irrigation sources
8 Irrigation cost
9 Credit facilities
10 Others
11-B
No. Of
trainings
No. Of
persons
trained
% of farmers
Practicing
After training
% of farmers
Practicing at
present
1
Skills trainings (repair of borewells, starter,
etc)
2 Knowledge on Borewell water sharing
3 Ground water management
4 Farmers Field School
5 Crop production
6 Orientation on group concepts
7 Others
11-C What are the factors influencing groundwater potential?
Sl No Factors Better Not Better No difference
1 Rainfall
2 Tanks
3 Stream flodding
4 Farm ponds
5 Check dam
6 Contour bunds
7 Gully plug
8 Social forestry
9 Others
Capacity Building activities adoptedSl No
What is your experience with your
well/irrigation source
Strengthening of Primary Stake holders
Details
Observations
AFPRO, Hyderabad 4 of 6

5. CBGMS Study Village Information - FGD
11-D Are you aware of the Soil & Moisture conservation measures?
S.No Practice Aware
Practices
now
Do not know
1 Farm Bunds
2 Tilling across the slope
3 Cover crops
4 Farm yard manure
5 Vermi compost
6 Others
11-E Do the farmers practice SRI method of paddy cultivation? Yes/No
If Yes
No. of farmers
Area (ac)
11-F Ground water management
i Status of Participatory Hydrological monitoring
Practicing (tick)
Yes No
if Yes Methodology adopted (Write in briefly)
ii Types of soils
Type of soil % area
Red
Black
Sandy loam
other (Specify)
iii Type of bed rock (tick)
Granite
iv Is there any stream passing in the village?
1
2
3
v Is there any sand mining in the stream? Yes/No
If yes Avg No. of Tractors per month------------- Since---------------- (Year)
vi Are there any preventive measures to stop sand mining?(G.P/Social regulation/M.R.O)
vii Influence of sand mining on the water table (opinion of community)
Remarks
Observations
Avg depth of soil(cm)
Murram Sedimentaries Other
AFPRO, Hyderabad 5 of 6

6. CBGMS Study Village Information - FGD
11-G
S.No Points to be Observed
1
Income
2
Reduced Poverty
3
Increased well being
4
Cropping pattern
5
Children attending schools
6
Empowerment of Women
7
Enhancement of natural resources
8
sustainable use of natural resources
9
Equitable sharing of water resources
10
Understanding on ground water resources
1 Excellent + + + +
2 Above Avg + + +
3 Below Avg + +
4 Poor +
After Project Implementation
Assessment of Improvement in social status and natural resources
Before Project Implementation
AFPRO, Hyderabad 6 of 6