This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for reliability and credibility. It lists several criteria to consider, such as assessing the authority and bias of the author, the purpose and credibility of affiliated organizations, the currency of the information, and the scope of content covered. It then presents some example websites on the topic of smoking dangers and asks the reader to evaluate them based on the criteria. The document stresses that even questionable websites can be used if the evaluator explicitly states their evaluation and reasons for including it. It directs the reader to proceed to assessing the websites.