Too Many Copies! The confusion between duplication and versioning

•Download as PPTX, PDF•

1 like•915 views

Muriel Mewissen makes a pitch for the new Jisc Publications Broker at the Open Repositories 2014 event in Helsinki, Finland.

Too Many Copies!
The confusion between
duplication and versioning
Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk EDINA, The University of Edinburgh

Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 2

Duplication
Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 3
Duplicate – copy, replica,
two of the same
Duplication is a good thing!
Not a problem to be dealt with!
Definition

Golden Copy?
Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 4
Definition
Version – variant form of something

Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 5

How many copies?
Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 6
Sources of multiplication
Author Publisher
AO VoRSMUR CVoRAM EVoRP
#2NISO JAV:

Open Access
Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 7
Publisher
IR Subject Repo
Author
#4
Sources of multiplication

Metadata
Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 8
Sources of multiplication
AM
Record = Metadata +
CROSSREF, DOI, NISO, ISNI, ORCID, CASRAI,
SHARE, OpenAIRE, RIOXX, CERIF, NLM, JATS, …
Same file, different records!

Collaborative Research
Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 9
Publisher
Subject Repo
Author
IR
IRIR
#8
Sources of multiplication

Research Information
Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 10
Publisher
Subject Repo
Author
IR
IR
IR
CRIS
#10
Sources of multiplication

Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 11
Publisher
Subject Repo
Author
IR
IR
IR
CRIS
#More
APIs and Subscriptions
Sources of multiplication

Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 12
Help from the Jisc Publications Router
Publisher
Subject Repo
Author
IR
IR
IR
CRIS
Publications Router

Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 13
• Should I merge records?
• How can I propagate changes?
• Who has the authority to make
changes?
• How can I make sure I report on
the correct number and version
of the records?
• How can I tell which is the right copy?
• Do I need to keep more than one copy?
• How can I tell if two copies are linked?
• How can I tell a copy is a duplicate?
• How can I tell a copy is a different version?

Muriel.Mewissen@ed.ac.uk OR2014 - Helsinki - 10 June 2014 14
Thanks!
Thanks!

It is not new to say that the scholarly communication system is sick. One way to put it is that the publishers have built a paywall around the papers written by our faculty and make us librarians pay for it. For years, Open Access via the green and gold route have been touted as a joint solution. To this end, as academic librarians, we focused on building institutional repositories and getting open access mandates. However, recently, many prominent members of the open access community have begun to express doubts about the viability of institutional repositories as a solution given the lack of success. Some, like Stevan Harnad self-dubbed “Open Access Archivangelist” for Green Open access, claim to have given up, while others, like Eric Van de Velde, suggest that we rethink other ways to accomplish Green Open access beyond just institutional repositories. In this webinar, we will summarise all the arguments and attempt to give a librarian’s point of view about the future of IRs.

UKSG webinar: Making Connections - Creating Linked Open Library Data with Nei...

UKSG: connecting the knowledge community

The British Library was one of the first national libraries to create and offer linked data in 2011 as part of its wider open data strategy. Since that point the organisation has gained considerable experience of the issues involved in the development and maintenance of a sustained linked data service. This presentation describes - Why libraries are interested in offering linked data? - What are some of the basic concepts involved in linked data? - How can linked data be created from library MARC data?

UKSG Conference 2016 Breakout Session - Discovery and linking integrity – do ...

UKSG: connecting the knowledge community

Relationship Building and Advocacy Across the Campus

UCD Library

UKSG Conference 2016 Breakout Session - Measuring the research impact of digi...

UKSG: connecting the knowledge community

This session offers the results of a study that tests the assertion that the online dissemination of theses has a positive impact on the research profile of the institution. Based on a combination of primary and secondary research, with some fascinating statistical comparative information, the study outlines the types of metrics an institution may use to measure the impact of its corpus of digitised dissertations and examines how these metrics may be generated. It is the result of a year-long study undertaken with the London School of Economics which focuses on the outcomes achieved through its programme of theses digitisation, disseminated simultaneously through its institutional repository and through the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database (PDTD). Results achieved by the LSE will be compared with metrics gathered globally by ProQuest via its PDTD. The session will be of interest to all librarians and academics involved in the use of digitised theses as a research resource, digitisation projects (retrospective or ongoing) and university rankings.

2015 NISO Forum: The Future of Library Resource Discovery

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

David Shotton - OpenCon Oxford, 1st Dec 2017

Crossref

David Shotton, Senior Researcher, Oxford eResearch Centre: http://oerc.ox.ac.uk/people/DavidShotton Director, OpenCitations http://opencitations.net david.shotton@opencitations.net Tony Epstein (Sir Michael Anthony Epstein, discoverer of the Epstein-Barr virus) once said to me something I’ve never forgotten: “Research that is not published is wasted research.” We live today in an era of open scholarship and open data, in which the Web is the primary means of communication. For many people, information that is not freely published on the Web might as well not exist. It is thus “wasted research”. However, within academia, we also have to live in the legacy world of subscription-access journals and subscription-access citation indexes such as Web of Science and Scopus – freely available only to members of rich scholarly institutions like Oxford University that pays hundreds of thousands of dollars annually to obtain access for their members, not to the rest of the world including scholars in developing nations. Today I will briefly discuss the five factors desirable for scholarly publications – the Five Stars of Online Journal Articles: peer review, open access, enriched content, available datasets and machine-readable metadata [1]. I will then discuss how bibliographic citations, which permit an author to give credit to another person's endeavours and integrate our independent acts of scholarship into a global knowledge network, are being freed from commercial restrictions by publication in the OpenCitations Corpus (http://opencitations.net), an open repository of scholarly citation data that others may build upon, enhance and reuse for any purpose [2, 3]. [1] Shotton D (2012). The Five Stars of Online Journal Articles — a Framework for Article Evaluation. D-Lib Magazine 18 (1/2) (January/February 2012 issue). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/january2012-shotton [2] David Shotton (2013). Open citations. Nature, 502 (7471): 295-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/502295a [3] Silvio Peroni, David Shotton, Fabio Vitali (2016). Freedom for bibliographic references: OpenCitations arise. Proceedings of 2016 International Workshop on Linked Data for Information Extraction (LD4IE 2016): 32-43. https://w3id.org/oc/paper/occ-lisc2016.html

The University of Hertfordshire (UH) implemented a new commercial Resource Discovery Service at the same time as it changed to the Koha Open Source Library Management System. In doing so it moved away from using Google Scholar, as its main platform, at a time when many universities are deciding to only use Google Scholar. Hear about the debate between commercial and non-commercial services and why UH made the decisions it did. After 18 months was it the right decision? What has been the impact on library services and library users?

RDAP 15: Data Curation Issues for Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Corn...

ASIS&T

Stop Press: Libraries' Role in the Future of Publishing

Danny Kingsley

This was presented to the SLA2016 conference in Philadelphia on 12 June. ABSTRACT: Libraries are moving from curators of bought content to providing access to research or industry outputs. This activity can range from the relatively informal process of dissemination through a repository to acting as publishers - through the hosting of research journals, bibliographies and newsletters to the provision of editorial services and advice. This 90 minute Master Class will look at different models of publishing in the library environment with several examples of publishing activity in different libraries. The session will start with a strategic overview of the need for libraries to actively engage in the dissemination of information created by their organisations. The discussion will cover the staffing implications including how to recruit and train for the required skills sets. Attendees will work through some of the issues that need to be considered if a library is interested in publishing, including some of the legal implications and the different software and technical platforms available. Ideas will be workshopped about ways to engage the institutional community and encourage uptake of services on offer. The class aims to provide practical information to allow attendees to make decisions about what services are achievable to offer their clients, both from a technical and a staffing perspective. Attendees who are currently publishing are actively encouraged to participate in the discussion.

Librarians supporting applied research and discipline-specific researchers

Library_Connect

On March 13, 2014, three chemistry PhDs presented a Library Connect webinar on “Librarians supporting applied research and discipline-specific researchers.” The presenters included: Oliver Renn, Head of the Chemistry | Biology | Pharmacy Information Center, Dept. of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich Jan Reedijk, Emeritus Professor of Chemistry, Leiden University and Professor of Chemistry at King Saud University in Riyadh Ye Li, Chemistry Librarian, Shapiro Science Library, University of Michigan More: http://ow.ly/uFI8H

2015 NISO Forum: The Future of Library Resource Discovery

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

UKSG Conference 2016 Breakout Session - Of Libraries and Labs: effecting user...

UKSG: connecting the knowledge community

JSTOR has launched a new Labs team charged with partnering with libraries and scholars to build innovative tools for research and teaching. The JSTOR Labs team has successfully used ‘flash builds’ – high-intensity, short-burst, user-driven development efforts – in order to bring an idea from conception to a working, user-delighting prototype in as little as a week. In this talk the presenter will describe the approach to flash builds, highlight the partnerships, skills, tools and content that help to innovate, and suggest ways that libraries can adopt these methods to support innovation and the digital humanities.

2015 NISO Forum: The Future of Library Resource Discovery

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Carnegie seminar

Nick Sheppard

Clarivate ERA Supplier rscd2018

SusanMRob

Clarivate as the Citation Provider for ERA presented by Jean-Francois Desvignes (Solution Consultant, Scientific and Academic Research, Clarivate Analytics) at the Research Support Community Day 2018 Clarivate Analytics was selected in 2017 to become the Citation provider by the Australian Research Council (ARC) for the 2018 Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) evaluation. We will first highlight the data from the Web of Science that was made available by our team to Australian Higher Education Providers (HEP) for ERA. Then, we will focus on the solutions developed my Clarivate Analytics to support the Australian HEPs when preparing and analysing their data and prior to the submission to the Australian Research Council.

Institutional Repositories: What the Open Access agenda means for a modern in...

Gaz Johnson

Let's Work Together: UCD Research, UCD Library & Altmetrics

UCD Library

Integrating research indicators for use in the repositories infrastructure

petrknoth

The current repository infrastructure, which consists of thousands of repositories, does not make effective use of research indicators largely exploited by commercial players in the area. Research indicators, including citation counts and Mendeley reader counts, enable the development and improvement of functionality researchers use on a daily basis. For example, they make it possible to increase the performance in information retrieval and recommendation tasks and serve as an enabler for the development of research analytics & metrics functionality, such as the analysis of research trends or collaboration networks. We believe that there is a strong case for making a better use of these indicators within the repositories infrastructure to improve the functionality of services users rely on.

NISO Virtual Conference Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Instituti...

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

OpenAthens Conference 2018 - Tim Lull and Chad Smith - Cultivating your onlin...

OpenAthens

COAR Next Generation Repositories WG - Text mining and Recommender system sto...

petrknoth

One of the key aims of the COAR NGR group is to help us to overcome the challenges that still make it difficult to move beyond repositories as document silos. The group wants to see a globally interoperable network of repositories and global services built on top of repositories fulfilling the expectations of users in the 21st century. During this talk, I will address two use cases the COAR NGR working group aims to enable: text and data mining and recommender systems.

Data Publishing Models by Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessen

datascienceiqss

Data Publishing is becoming an integral part of scholarly communication today. Thus, it is indispensable to understand how data publishing works across disciplines. Are there best practices others can learn from or even data publishing standards? How do they impact interoperability in the Open Science landscape? The presentation will look at a range of examples, and the main building blocks of data publishing today. The work has been conducted as part of the RDA Data Publishing Workflows group.

The Stars My Destination

Gaz Johnson

Leicester Research Archive (LRA): the work of a repository administrator

Gaz Johnson

Introduction to RDM for trainee physicians

Historic Environment Scotland

Actions to Ensure the Integrity and Continuity of the Scholarly Record

Too Many Copies! The confusion between duplication and versioning

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

More from EDINA, University of Edinburgh

More from EDINA, University of Edinburgh (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Too Many Copies! The confusion between duplication and versioning