Management of research data specifically for Engineering and Physical Science. Delivered by Stuart Macdonald at the "Support for Enhancing Research Impact" meeting at the University of Edinburgh on 22 June 2016.
The document summarizes a pilot project at the University of Edinburgh to support the development of a UK Research Data Discovery Service. PhD interns engaged with researchers from various schools to describe and deposit research datasets in the university's systems to be harvested by the discovery service. Observations found mixed results across schools, with humanities researchers less comfortable sharing data due to copyright and reluctance to share interpretations. Other schools had established data repositories causing less interest in the university's system. Building research data management practices will require tailored approaches and more training over time.
Overcoming obstacles to sharing data about human subjectsRobin Rice
This document discusses overcoming obstacles to sharing human subject data from research. It notes that most data underlying published research is not shared, limiting reproducibility. Common barriers include confidentiality concerns. The document provides recommendations for researchers to plan for data sharing, obtain proper consent, anonymize data when possible, and restrict access when necessary to protect subjects. When data cannot be fully opened, it suggests taking proportionate precautions like reviewing access applications. The dangers of probabilistic data linkage are also discussed. The document promotes using information governance frameworks that follow ethical standards to enable research in the public interest.
The document summarizes a pilot project at the University of Edinburgh to support the development of a UK Research Data Discovery Service. PhD interns engaged with researchers from various schools to describe and deposit research datasets in the university's systems to be harvested by the discovery service. Observations found mixed results across schools, with humanities researchers less comfortable sharing data due to copyright and reluctance to share interpretations. Other schools had established data repositories causing less interest in the university's system. Building research data management practices will require tailored approaches and more training over time.
Overcoming obstacles to sharing data about human subjectsRobin Rice
This document discusses overcoming obstacles to sharing human subject data from research. It notes that most data underlying published research is not shared, limiting reproducibility. Common barriers include confidentiality concerns. The document provides recommendations for researchers to plan for data sharing, obtain proper consent, anonymize data when possible, and restrict access when necessary to protect subjects. When data cannot be fully opened, it suggests taking proportionate precautions like reviewing access applications. The dangers of probabilistic data linkage are also discussed. The document promotes using information governance frameworks that follow ethical standards to enable research in the public interest.
The UK federation is the largest education and research access management federation in the world, with over 890 member institutions and 1330 registered entities. It is funded by JISC and provides free membership and entity registration to higher and further education institutions and service providers. The McShib team maintains the federation infrastructure, provides support for configuration, software updates, and technical issues, and is working on initiatives like preparing for Shibboleth 3 and increasing interoperability.
Research Data Management Introduction: EUDAT/Open AIRE Webinar| www.eudat.eu | EUDAT
This webinar discusses research data management. It explains why managing data is important for reproducibility, avoiding data loss, and meeting funder requirements. It outlines Horizon 2020's requirements for open data and describes services from EUDAT and OpenAIRE that can help with the entire data lifecycle from creation to long-term preservation and sharing. The webinar covers best practices like creating data management plans, metadata, using standards, licensing, and selecting repositories to archive and share research data.
Research data management at TU EindhovenLeon Osinski
The document discusses research data management at TU Eindhoven. It outlines the long process of developing RDM practices since 2008. It describes the current organization and governance structure for RDM. Key external requirements for RDM from funders, regulations, and integrity standards are also summarized. The document concludes by outlining RDM support services available and the benefits of good RDM practices.
RJ Broker is a middleware tool that automates the delivery of research output from content suppliers like Europe PMC to institutional and subject repositories. It accepts research articles and metadata, processes them into a common format, identifies target repositories based on author affiliation, and transfers the content to registered repositories using protocols like SWORD. The tool provides different levels of service, including browsing content, downloading via APIs, notification of new content, and direct delivery of open access and embargoed content to repositories. Joining the RJ Broker service can help increase deposits in repositories and reduce effort for complying with open access mandates.
Research Data Management: An Introductory Webinar from OpenAIRE and EUDATTony Ross-Hellauer
OpenAIRE and EUDAT co-present this webinar which aims to introduce researchers and others to the concept of research data management (RDM). As well as presenting the benefits of taking an active approach to research data management – including increased speed and ease of access, efficiency (fund once, reuse many times), and improved quality and transparency of research – the webinar will advise on strategies for successful RDM, resources to help manage data effectively, choosing where to store and deposit data, the EC H2020 Open Data Pilot and the basics of data management, stewardship and archiving.
Webinar recording available: http://www.instantpresenter.com/eifl/EB57D6888147
This document discusses data management plans (DMPs), which are brief plans that define how research data will be created, documented, stored, shared, and preserved. DMPs are often required as part of grant applications. The document provides an overview of why DMPs are important, how they benefit researchers and institutions, and key aspects to address in a DMP such as data organization, stakeholders, and making data FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable). Examples of DMPs from real projects are also presented.
SDA (Survey Documentation and Analysis) is software that allows users to access and analyze numeric microdata from repositories without needing specialized statistical software. It generates descriptive and inferential statistics, and basic visualizations. SDA benefits researchers by providing statistical analysis capabilities and easy access to metadata. It benefits repositories by facilitating secondary use of data while protecting sensitive information. SDA shows the value of numeric data for teaching and research.
What funders want you to do with your dataLeon Osinski
Funders want researchers to 1) deposit the relevant data from their research in an approved repository to make it FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable), 2) make the data openly available whenever possible, and 3) write a Data Management Plan describing how they will manage their data during and after the project. Funders require depositing data in repositories to enable reuse, making data open access "as open as possible, as closed as necessary", and having a Data Management Plan that addresses reuse according to FAIR principles.
An introduction to Research Data Management and Data Management Planning for research managers and administrators. The presentation was given at the Open University on 18th July 2013.
A presentation offering an introduction to managing and sharing research data given at the Czech Open Science days as part of the EC-funded FOSTER project.
The document provides information about MANTRA, a free online course for research data management created by the University of Edinburgh. MANTRA teaches best practices for managing research data through open educational modules aligned with the research data lifecycle. It is available for reuse and repurposing under an open license. The course covers topics like data planning, organization, documentation, storage, security, and sharing.
Presentation given at the European Research Council workshop on research data management and sharing in Brussels on 18th-19th September 2014. The presentation covers the benefits and drivers for RDM, points to relevant tools and resources and closes with some open questions for discussion.
The University of Edinburgh has taken several steps to improve research data management:
1. They developed the first research data management policy in the UK to provide guidelines for storing, sharing, and preserving research data.
2. They created online training and guidance materials called MANTRA to teach researchers best practices for data organization, documentation, and long-term access.
3. They are developing research data services including a data library, repository, and storage strategies to support researchers in managing their data throughout the research lifecycle and ensuring access over time.
In order to be reused, research data must be discoverable.
The EPSRC Research Data Expectations* requires research organisations to maintain a data catalogue to record metadata about research data generated by EPSRC-funded research projects.
Universities are increasingly making research data assets available through repositories or other data portals.
The requirement for a UK research data discovery service has grown as universities become more involved in RDM and capacity develops.
This document provides guidance on research data management and developing data management plans. It discusses why managing research data is important, including making research easier to conduct, avoiding accusations of fraud or bad science, and getting credit for data produced. The document outlines what is involved in research data management and considerations for sharing and preserving data, such as file formats, documentation, and standards. It emphasizes the importance of data management planning and provides tips on developing plans to meet funder requirements.
Presentation given by Sarah Jones at a seminar run by LSHTM on 6th November 2012. http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/events/2012/11/developing-data-management-expertise-in-research---half-day-event
The UK federation is the largest education and research access management federation in the world, with over 890 member institutions and 1330 registered entities. It is funded by JISC and provides free membership and entity registration to higher and further education institutions and service providers. The McShib team maintains the federation infrastructure, provides support for configuration, software updates, and technical issues, and is working on initiatives like preparing for Shibboleth 3 and increasing interoperability.
Research Data Management Introduction: EUDAT/Open AIRE Webinar| www.eudat.eu | EUDAT
This webinar discusses research data management. It explains why managing data is important for reproducibility, avoiding data loss, and meeting funder requirements. It outlines Horizon 2020's requirements for open data and describes services from EUDAT and OpenAIRE that can help with the entire data lifecycle from creation to long-term preservation and sharing. The webinar covers best practices like creating data management plans, metadata, using standards, licensing, and selecting repositories to archive and share research data.
Research data management at TU EindhovenLeon Osinski
The document discusses research data management at TU Eindhoven. It outlines the long process of developing RDM practices since 2008. It describes the current organization and governance structure for RDM. Key external requirements for RDM from funders, regulations, and integrity standards are also summarized. The document concludes by outlining RDM support services available and the benefits of good RDM practices.
RJ Broker is a middleware tool that automates the delivery of research output from content suppliers like Europe PMC to institutional and subject repositories. It accepts research articles and metadata, processes them into a common format, identifies target repositories based on author affiliation, and transfers the content to registered repositories using protocols like SWORD. The tool provides different levels of service, including browsing content, downloading via APIs, notification of new content, and direct delivery of open access and embargoed content to repositories. Joining the RJ Broker service can help increase deposits in repositories and reduce effort for complying with open access mandates.
Research Data Management: An Introductory Webinar from OpenAIRE and EUDATTony Ross-Hellauer
OpenAIRE and EUDAT co-present this webinar which aims to introduce researchers and others to the concept of research data management (RDM). As well as presenting the benefits of taking an active approach to research data management – including increased speed and ease of access, efficiency (fund once, reuse many times), and improved quality and transparency of research – the webinar will advise on strategies for successful RDM, resources to help manage data effectively, choosing where to store and deposit data, the EC H2020 Open Data Pilot and the basics of data management, stewardship and archiving.
Webinar recording available: http://www.instantpresenter.com/eifl/EB57D6888147
This document discusses data management plans (DMPs), which are brief plans that define how research data will be created, documented, stored, shared, and preserved. DMPs are often required as part of grant applications. The document provides an overview of why DMPs are important, how they benefit researchers and institutions, and key aspects to address in a DMP such as data organization, stakeholders, and making data FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable). Examples of DMPs from real projects are also presented.
SDA (Survey Documentation and Analysis) is software that allows users to access and analyze numeric microdata from repositories without needing specialized statistical software. It generates descriptive and inferential statistics, and basic visualizations. SDA benefits researchers by providing statistical analysis capabilities and easy access to metadata. It benefits repositories by facilitating secondary use of data while protecting sensitive information. SDA shows the value of numeric data for teaching and research.
What funders want you to do with your dataLeon Osinski
Funders want researchers to 1) deposit the relevant data from their research in an approved repository to make it FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable), 2) make the data openly available whenever possible, and 3) write a Data Management Plan describing how they will manage their data during and after the project. Funders require depositing data in repositories to enable reuse, making data open access "as open as possible, as closed as necessary", and having a Data Management Plan that addresses reuse according to FAIR principles.
An introduction to Research Data Management and Data Management Planning for research managers and administrators. The presentation was given at the Open University on 18th July 2013.
A presentation offering an introduction to managing and sharing research data given at the Czech Open Science days as part of the EC-funded FOSTER project.
The document provides information about MANTRA, a free online course for research data management created by the University of Edinburgh. MANTRA teaches best practices for managing research data through open educational modules aligned with the research data lifecycle. It is available for reuse and repurposing under an open license. The course covers topics like data planning, organization, documentation, storage, security, and sharing.
Presentation given at the European Research Council workshop on research data management and sharing in Brussels on 18th-19th September 2014. The presentation covers the benefits and drivers for RDM, points to relevant tools and resources and closes with some open questions for discussion.
The University of Edinburgh has taken several steps to improve research data management:
1. They developed the first research data management policy in the UK to provide guidelines for storing, sharing, and preserving research data.
2. They created online training and guidance materials called MANTRA to teach researchers best practices for data organization, documentation, and long-term access.
3. They are developing research data services including a data library, repository, and storage strategies to support researchers in managing their data throughout the research lifecycle and ensuring access over time.
In order to be reused, research data must be discoverable.
The EPSRC Research Data Expectations* requires research organisations to maintain a data catalogue to record metadata about research data generated by EPSRC-funded research projects.
Universities are increasingly making research data assets available through repositories or other data portals.
The requirement for a UK research data discovery service has grown as universities become more involved in RDM and capacity develops.
This document provides guidance on research data management and developing data management plans. It discusses why managing research data is important, including making research easier to conduct, avoiding accusations of fraud or bad science, and getting credit for data produced. The document outlines what is involved in research data management and considerations for sharing and preserving data, such as file formats, documentation, and standards. It emphasizes the importance of data management planning and provides tips on developing plans to meet funder requirements.
Presentation given by Sarah Jones at a seminar run by LSHTM on 6th November 2012. http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/events/2012/11/developing-data-management-expertise-in-research---half-day-event
The document summarizes a presentation about Jorum, a UK national repository for sharing learning and teaching materials. It discusses how Jorum has been reshaped to support open educational resources and open courseware by adopting the DSpace platform and adding features like Creative Commons licensing, content packaging support, and metadata registration via RSS feeds. The goal is for Jorum to be a place where open content from UK higher education projects can be stored, managed, and made available worldwide.
The document discusses SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) and federated access management. It notes that while technical capabilities exist to provide more granular attribute data through SAML, in practice most identity providers only provide basic attributes like affiliation due to data protection concerns and a lack of demand from service providers. Overcoming this stable deadlock will require experimentation and agreement between identity providers and service providers on desirable and possible attribute sharing models from the bottom up in specific application areas.
The WSTIERIA Project aims to enable federated authentication for web services without requiring browser-based protocols. The initial "facade" approach uses an Apache proxy that redirects authenticated browser sessions to rewrite URLs in web service responses. However, this approach has limitations when applied to arbitrary protocols due to dependencies on URLs. The project is now exploring using Shibboleth's delegated authentication extension, which allows a portal application to transparently authenticate a user to a backend web service without further login.
This document provides guidance on using social media to communicate research work. It recommends considering goals and target audiences when planning social media use. Popular tools like blogs, Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr are discussed as ways to share updates, build networks, and engage audiences. Both barriers and appropriate content for social media are addressed. In particular, the document advises checking privacy and disclosure policies, and avoiding sharing sensitive or unprofessional information.
Introduction to an ICT based cross curricular resource for Secondary Geography PGDE students, given by Anne Robertson and Carol Blackwood at the University of Strathclyde on 27 October 2015.
An overview of Jisc MediaHub from Andrew Bevan from Edina. Part of the "Insight into using digital media" webinar. All the resources are available at http://bit.ly/insight-resources.
This document discusses the public nature of participating online for learning. It notes that posting content online, even just to friends, means it is not truly private. It also discusses how participating online can mean doing so in semi-public spaces where one's identity and work is visible. The document outlines some of the challenges this public nature introduces, such as managing one's online identity and ensuring safe spaces exist for learning and making mistakes. It emphasizes the importance of establishing trust online and considering the student experience of participating publicly.
This document summarizes the AddressingHistory project, which created an online crowdsourcing tool combining digitized historical Scottish Post Office Directories (PODs) with historical maps. The project had two phases: the first created the initial tool using three POD volumes from 1784-1805, 1865, and 1905-1906. The second phase expanded coverage to additional years and locations, improved parsing of names and occupations, and added new search and visualization features. Lessons learned included the need for ongoing refinement, sustainability planning, and engagement of relevant communities.
1) The document discusses roles and responsibilities in ensuring permanent access to scholarly works.
2) It notes that while access to works has improved online, continuity of access is challenged as content can disappear from the web.
3) The document reports on measured progress in archiving journal content through organizations like CLOCKSS and Portico, but notes that only 19% of identified online journals are currently being preserved.
The document introduces the COBWEB project, which developed a crowdsourcing platform for citizen science. It summarizes that COBWEB ran from 2012-2016, created mobile apps to collect validated environmental data from citizens, and tested the platform in several biosphere reserves. The document discusses balancing research and testing goals as the project neared completion and looked to scale up participation and ensure data access.
This webinar provided an introduction to 2011 Census geography. It discussed key differences between the 2011 Census and previous censuses, including that 97.4% of output areas changed. It also covered new aspects like workplace zones geography and standardized identifiers. The webinar demonstrated Census Support tools for accessing and mapping UK census data through the UK Data Service.
This was a guest lecture presented online at 12.30pm, Monday 14th October 2013, as part of Session 2: Co-creation in the University of Edinburgh Institute for Academic Development's Online Tutoring course (Autumn 2013).
Stuart Macdonald talks about the Research Data Management programme at the University of Edinburgh Data Library, delivered at the ADP Workshop for Librarians: Open Research Data in Social Sciences and Humanities (ADP), Ljubljana, Slovenia, 18 June 2014
The document discusses using OpenURL activity data to provide recommendations and personalization, similar to how a pizza delivery service knows customers' usual orders and can recommend new options. It provides examples of OpenURL request data logged by institutional resolvers and routers that could be used to see common search patterns and provide additional related resources to users. The document encourages analyzing the public OpenURL log data to learn more about usage at individual institutions and how to best maintain and upgrade the service.
Presented by Robin Rice at the "IRs dealing with data" workshop at the Open Repositories 2013 Conference in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, on 8 July 2013.
Stuart Macdonald reviews what researchers need to do to comply with the new EPSRC framework concerning the management and provision of access to publicly-funded research data. Presented at the Mobility, Mood and Place Research Committee Meeting workshop at the Edinburgh College of Art, 16 June, 2015.
Alain Frey Research Data for universities and information producersIncisive_Events
Research data is growing exponentially but is disparate and challenging to understand fully. Universities face challenges in managing research data to meet funding and standards requirements. Thomson Reuters launched the Data Citation Index to make research data discoverable, accessible, and citable by bringing important data from diverse repositories into one searchable index. This addresses the need for a single access point for quality research data across disciplines and locations.
An overview of the LSHTM Research Data Management Policy, outlining the motivations for its introduction, obligations that need to be met and the support available
The document provides an overview of research data management (RDM) and the RDM services that Lancaster University plans to offer. It discusses that RDM involves maintaining and preserving digital research data throughout its lifecycle. It also notes that funder requirements and policies are driving universities to improve RDM practices to ensure long-term access and reuse of research data. Lancaster University plans to offer storage, advocate for RDM, provide training and support, help with data management plans, and collaborate with other universities and groups like N8 on RDM issues.
Stuart Macdonald steps through the process of creating a robust data management plan for researchers. Presented at the European Association for Health Information and Libraries (EAHIL) 2015 workshop, Edinburgh, 11 June 2015.
The document provides information on creating a data management plan (DMP) for grant applications. It discusses what a DMP is, why they are important, and what funders require in a DMP. A DMP outlines how research data will be collected, documented, stored, shared, and preserved. The document recommends addressing six key themes in a DMP: data types and standards; ethics and intellectual property; data access, sharing and reuse; short-term storage and management; long-term preservation; and resourcing. Developing a strong DMP helps researchers manage data effectively and makes data available and reusable by others.
This slide deck provides an overview and resources to respond to the OSTP memo with the subject: Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research issued by John P. Holdren in February 2013. It provides resources and information agencies, foundations, and research projects can use to assemble achieve public access to scientific data in digital formats.
This document provides an overview of making research data open and preparing it for sharing. It discusses why data should be shared, including benefits like innovation, transparency and increased citations. It covers funder and publisher policies requiring data sharing. Key points on preparing data for sharing include adding metadata and documentation, using open file formats, and considering intellectual property rights and licensing. The document also discusses ethical issues around informing participants and seeking consent, as well as new GDPR requirements.
This document provides an overview of research data sharing, including why data should be shared, how to prepare data for sharing, considerations around rights and ethics, and reusing shared data. The key points covered are the benefits of sharing data, funder and publisher policies requiring data plans and sharing, preparing data by adding documentation and using open formats, obtaining informed consent, and where to find shared data for reuse.
This talk was given by Brianna Marshall and Ryan Schryver at a joint informational session hosted by the College of Letters & Science Pre-Award Services, the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, the College of Engineering, and Research and Sponsored Programs.
Agencies such as the NSF and NIH require data management plans as part of research proposals and the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) is requiring federal agencies to develop plans to increase public access to results of federally funded scientific research. These slides explore sustainable data sharing models, including models for sharing restricted-use data. Demos of these models and tips for accessing public data access services are provided as well as resources for creating data management plans for grant applications.
Rachel Bruce UK research and data management where are we nowJisc
The document discusses the state of research data management in UK universities. It finds that while areas like data cataloguing and access/storage systems are progressing, governance of data access/reuse and digital preservation/planning are lagging. Barriers to progress include low researcher priority, funding availability, and lack of staff/infrastructure. Gaps include defining responsibilities, standards, costs, and tools. Coordination and sharing resources across institutions is needed to help universities advance research data management.
Paper was presented at European Survey Research Association 2013, in the session Research Data Management for Re-use: Bringing Researchers and Archivists closer.
UK Funder Policy - the results of the Academic Spring?Neil Chue Hong
The document discusses recent UK funder policies that emphasize open access and reproducibility in computational research. Two influential reports in 2012 addressed improving access to published research findings. In response, the Research Councils UK implemented new open access and data policies starting in 2013. These policies require publicly sharing research publications and data, with exceptions for legal or commercial reasons. The policies aim to make publicly funded research outputs openly available and reusable. Assessment of research is expanding to include software and datasets as valid research outputs.
The document discusses open access policies for research data at the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). It provides an overview of ICRAF's policy which states that data should be made openly accessible within 12 months of collection or project milestone. The policy allows centers flexibility to determine what constitutes incomplete or low-value data. Common misconceptions about open access are addressed, and benefits of open data are discussed such as improved publications, transparency, and recognition for researchers. Guidelines are provided for implementing open data policies including using metadata standards and archiving data.
Presentación de Joy Davidson, Digital Curation Centre (UK) en FOSTER event: Data Management Plan and Social Impact of Research. Universitat Jaume I, 27 mayo 2016
Data sharing is the practice of making research data openly available to others. It has many benefits including enabling innovation, improving transparency and research integrity, and increasing citations and impact. Major funders now require data sharing as a condition of funding. To share data, it must be prepared by documenting it with metadata and supporting files. This allows others to understand and use the data. Researchers are encouraged to share data in open repositories to maximize access and reuse. Proper preparation of data for sharing helps ensure data is FAIR - Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable.
The document summarizes the Jisc Managing Research Data Programme which aims to support universities in improving research data management. It discusses why managing research data is important, highlighting funder policies and the benefits of open data. It provides an overview of Jisc's activities including training projects, guidance resources, and funding for institutional infrastructure services and repositories. The presentation emphasizes the importance of institutional policies, support services, skills development and cultural change to effectively manage research data in line with funder expectations.
Similar to EPSRC research data expectations and PURE for datasets (20)
A look at the research being carried out by Dr Stuart Dunn at Kings College London. This includes his work on rediscovering Corpse Paths in Great Britain.
The Land Cover Map 2015 (LCM2015) is a map of land cover classes across the UK produced every 5-10 years. It is based on classification of Landsat satellite imagery from the summer and winter and additional data layers. The LCM2015 contains over 7.5 million land parcels classified into 21 land cover classes. It is an important resource used widely in research, commercial, government and nonprofit applications related to agriculture, ecology, climate, planning and more.
A presentation by John Murray from Fusion Data Science given at EDINA's GeoForum 2017 about the use of Lidar Data and the technology and techniques that can be used on it to create useful datasets.
Slides accompanying the presentation:"Reference Rot in Theses: A HiberActive Pilot", a 10x10 session (10 slides over 10 minutes) presented by Nicola Osborne (EDINA, University of Edinburgh). This presentation was part of Repository Fringe 2017 (#rfringe17) held on 3rd August 2017 in Edinburgh. The slides describe a project to develop Site2Cite, a new (pilot) tool for researchers to archive their web citations and ensure their readers can access that archive copy should the website change over time (including "Reference Rot" and "Content Drift").
This document provides an overview of managing digital footprints. It discusses what a digital footprint is, research conducted at the University of Edinburgh on digital footprints, and factors that contribute to one's digital footprint such as social media, location data, and online searches. The document notes that digital footprints can impact professional and personal reputation. It provides tips for taking ownership of one's digital footprint such as regularly searching for oneself online and reviewing privacy settings. Resources for further information and managing digital footprints are also listed.
The document discusses using digital technology and maps to represent the HMS Iolaire tragedy, a maritime disaster in 1919 where 205 men from the Isle of Lewis died after returning from World War I. It describes adding photos, text, and showing change over time to maps to help tell the story and create a sense of place. Specific details are provided about the journey the men took from England to the Western Isles on New Year's Day 1919 and how maps at different scales can portray events in different ways.
This document introduces Digimap for Schools, an online mapping service designed for schools to use in geography and other subjects. It has Ordnance Survey maps of Great Britain at different zoom levels, as well as historic maps and aerial photography. Students can add their own labels, markers, and other elements to maps. The service allows measuring distances and areas. It is browser-based and can be accessed from school or home. Over 2,690 schools in Britain currently use the service, including 185 Scottish secondary schools. The document outlines how Digimap for Schools can support teaching and learning in subjects beyond geography like numeracy, social studies, sciences, and more. Examples of lessons and activities using the mapping service are provided.
This document provides an introduction to Digimap for Schools, an online mapping service designed for use in UK schools. It highlights key features such as access to historic maps from the 1890s and 1950s, aerial photography, and tools for annotating, measuring, and analyzing maps. Schools subscribe to the service, which allows unlimited users per school to access maps and tools through a web browser on any device. The presenter emphasizes how Digimap for Schools can support teaching and learning across the Scottish curriculum, particularly for geography, by facilitating hands-on activities with maps, data, and spatial analysis. Examples are given of how schools have used the service for topics like land use change, density calculations, and proportional mapping. Teachers observing the presentation
"Managing your Digital Footprint : Taking control of the metadata and tracks and traces that define us online" invited presentation for CIG Scotland's 7th Metadata & Web 2.0 Seminar: "Somewhere over the Rainbow: our metadata online, past, present & future", which took place at the National Library of Scotland, 5th April 2017.
Slides accompanying Nicola Osborne's(EDINA Digital Education Manager) session on "Social media and blogging to develop and communicate research in the arts and humanities" at the "Academic Publishing: Routes to Success" event held at the University of Stirling on 23rd January 2017.
"Enhancing your research impact through social media" - presentation given by Nicola Osborne, EDINA Digital Education Manager, at the Edinburgh Postgraduate Law Conference 2017 (19th January 2017).
Social Media in Marketing in Support of Your Personal Brand - Nicola Osborne, EDINA Digital Education Manager, for Abertay University (Dundee) 4th Year Marketing Students.
Best Practice for Social Media in Teaching & Learning Contexts, slides accompanying a presentation by Nicola Osborne, EDINA Digital Education Manager, for Abertay University (Dundee). The hashtag for this event was #AbTLEJan2017.
Big Just Got Bigger! discusses the challenges of managing large map collections through the Digimap service. Digimap provides access to geospatial data from various sources, including Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, aerial imagery, and more. It has grown significantly over time to include more data sources and users. Managing such large datasets and meeting user expectations of current data and performance presents challenges. Issues include keeping data current while sharing across platforms, disk storage needs increasing exponentially over time, and ensuring data can be accessed and used through various tools and formats.
This document summarizes new and enhanced features in Digimap services from 2015-2016. Key updates include a refreshed homepage, responsive design for tablets, a new historic downloader application, marine chart roam with updated data, additions to ancient roam, land cover vector data, and improvements to geology, marine, and OS data. Usability and performance enhancements were also made, such as improved geo-referencing, easier use of 3D data, and a more reliable backend system. Feedback from users helped inform priority quality improvements.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
EPSRC research data expectations and PURE for datasets
1. EPSRC research data expectations and PURE
for datasets
Stuart Macdonald
Associate Data Librarian
University of Edinburgh
stuart.macdonald@ed.ac.uk
Information Services: Support for Enhancing Research Impact, JCMB, KB, 22 June 2016
2. • EDINA and Data Library are a division within Information Services (IS) of the
University of Edinburgh.
• EDINA is a Jisc-funded centre for digital expertise providing national online
resources for education and research.
• Data Library & Consultancy assists Edinburgh University users in the discovery,
access, use and management of research datasets.
• The Data Library forms part of the new Research Data Service – the culmination of
a 48 month RDM Roadmap (Phases 0 - 4) to implement the University’s RDM
Policy and develop a suite of RDM Services that map onto the research lifecycle.
Background
3. What is research data?
Research data is defined by EPSRC as recorded factual material commonly used in
the scientific community as necessary to validate research findings
Although the majority of such data is created in digital format, all research data is
included irrespective of the format in which it is created.
Note that EPSRC does not expect every piece of data produced during a project to
be retained – decisions about what to keep should be taken on a case by case
basis.
There is however a clear expectation that data which underpins published research
outputs will be retained and managed.
4. • EPSRC have introduced a policy framework addressing the management
and provision of access to publicly-funded research data.
• EPSRC Principal Investigators and the University must demonstrate to
EPSRC that their expectations are being met. The 9 expectations are
detailed at: http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/about/standards/researchdata/
• EPSRC began monitoring compliance on 1st May 2015 on a case-by-case
basis.
• If it judges sharing of research data is being obstructed then it reserves
the right to impose sanctions.
5. EPSRC policy framework on research
data:http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/about/standards/researchdata/impact/
6. The expectations arise from 7 core principles which align with
the core RCUK principles on data sharing, namely:
• EPSRC-funded research data is a public good produced in the public
interest and should be made openly available with as few restrictions as
possible in a timely and responsible manner.
• EPSRC recognises that there are legal, ethical and commercial constraints
on release of research data
• Sharing research data is an important contributor to the impact of publicly
funded research.
7. • EPSRC-funded researchers should be entitled to a limited period of
privileged access to the data they collect to allow them to write up and
publish their results.
• Data management policies and plans (and software management plans!)
should be in accordance with relevant standards and community best
practice and should exist for all data
• Sufficient metadata should be recorded and made openly available to
enable other researchers to understand the potential re-use of the data
for further research
• It is appropriate to use public funds to support the preservation and
management of publicly-funded research data.
8. What do PIs and researchers need to
know?
• All researchers or research students funded by EPSRC will be required to
comply with these expectations.
• Data that is not generated in digital format will be stored in a manner to
facilitate it being shared in the event of a valid request for access.
• A link to digital research data is expected to be included in the metadata.
• Where access to data is restricted published metadata should give the
reason and summarise the conditions which must be satisfied for access
to be granted.
9. • Key expectation 1: The data should be securely stored for at least 10 years
• Key expectation 2: An online record should be created within 12 months of
the data being generated that describes the research data and how to
access it.
• Key expectation 3: Published research papers should include a short
statement describing how and on what terms any supporting research
data may be accessed.
What do PIs and researchers need to do?
10. • Research data that underpins a publication must be stored safely and securely, and made
accessible.
• Data may already be managed by a trusted domain archive outside of the university, in
which case data may not need to be stored locally.
• If not then data must be stored in a suitable UoE storage solution. Minimal compliance is
achieved by having your data on DataStore and then making a secure copy of it into the
Data Vault (this service is currently in development).
• For those who wish to openly publish data (and a snapshot of their research software),
Edinburgh DataShare is the university’s open online repository of data produced by local
researchers (policies, licence, citation).
• Datasets added to DataShare will also be allocated a persistent identifier (DOI) for
citations.
Key expectation 1: store data securely
11. • Research staff are therefore expected to add a metadata record for any
EPSRC-funded research data, normally within 12 months of the data being
generated.
• The University is using PURE to record descriptive data (metadata) about
the research data in order to meet this expectation.
• To enter a new dataset description in PURE, click on the green ‘Add new’
button, and select ‘Dataset’.
• Once added to PURE via the dataset content type, the resulting record
should link to the funding source and also link to any associated
publications.
Key expectation 2: a record describing
the data must be freely available online
13. • If the dataset is available online, e.g. in DataShare, a persistent identifier
(or DOI) of that dataset should also be added.
• Where access to the data is to be restricted, the published dataset
metadata in PURE should give the reason and summarise the conditions
which must be satisfied to grant access.
• Dataset metadata added to PURE will be publicly accessible via the
Edinburgh Research Explorer subject to confidentiality and other such
restrictions.
• Dataset metadata from both PURE and DataShare is harvested by the pilot
UKRDDS - http://ckan.data.alpha.jisc.ac.uk/dataset
– Currently no interoperation between PURE and DataShare
– Work commencing to convert PURE v. 5 API into an OAI-PMH end-point
14. • This expectation could be satisfied by citing data in the published research with links to
the data or to supporting documentation that describes the data, how it may be
accessed and any constraints that may apply. Such links should be persistent URLs such
as DOIs.
• An example of a basic data citation would be of the form: ‘Creator (Publication Year):
Title. Publisher. DOI’ Further details can be found at:
https://www.datacite.org/services/cite-your-data.html
• If commercial, legal or ethical reasons exist to protect access to the data these should
be noted in a statement included in the published research paper. A simple direction to
interested parties to ‘contact the author for access’ may not be considered sufficient.
• The paper must also be made Open Access in PURE.
Key expectation 3: include a statement in
published papers under-pinned by EPSRC-funded data
15. Support
Implementation of the EPSRC Policy at Edinburgh is being supported by the Research
Data Service delivered by Information Services
For help about meeting this policy requirement contact:
• Email: IS.Helpline@ed.ac.uk with “Help with EPSRC data policy framework” in
your subject line.
• Email: PURE@ed.ac.uk if you have questions about PURE.
For help about research data management in general contact:
• Email: IS.Helpline@ed.ac.uk with “Help with Research Data Management in
general” in your subject line.
• Email: IS.Helpline@ed.ac.uk if you would like to arrange an RDM training or
awareness raising session.
16. Thanks!
• Data Library Services: http://www.ed.ac.uk/is/data-library
• EDINA: http://edina.ac.uk/
• University of Edinburgh RDM Roadmap: http://www.ed.ac.uk/information-services/about/strategy-
planning/rdm-roadmap
• University of Edinburgh RDM Policy: http://www.ed.ac.uk/information-services/about/policies-and-
regulations/research-data-policy
• DataStore: https://www.wiki.ed.ac.uk/x/Np9FD
• Edinburgh DataShare: http://datashare.is.ed.ac.uk/
• Data Catalogue in PURE: http://www.pure.ed.ac.uk
• Writing and using a software management plan - http://www.software.ac.uk/resources/guides/software-
management-plans
Editor's Notes
First of its kind in the UK – primarily within the social sciences but not exclusively so
2 data library services – this morning I’ll concentrate on Edinburgh Datashare
Advise on storing, versioning, documenting, formatting and anonymising researchers’ data for sharing or preserving for future use in an archive or repository