This document summarizes a presentation about using ePortfolios as a tool for curriculum redesign at Northeastern University. It discusses how the university analyzed 150 student ePortfolios to better understand their needs and strengths. This led Northeastern to intentionally design a new curriculum around core competencies and make it more cohesive, authentic, and reflective through the use of ePortfolios. An example concentration in eLearning Design is provided that incorporates foundation courses, experiential learning, and a professional portfolio to help students develop skills needed for the future of technology-rich learning.
A Window and a Doorway: ePortfolios in Support of Program RedesignGail Matthews-DeNatale
Session Presented in Boston at the 2014 AAEEBL Conference (Association for Authentic, Experiential, Evidence-Based Learning)
Session Abstract: ePortfolios provide a window into student perception, a view that cannot be attained through other means. In 2012 Northeastern’s M.Ed. Program analyzed students’ portfolios to assess their presentation of self and representation of learning. This served as the doorway to redesigning a cohesive curriculum in which portfolio-based signature assignments integrate theory with practice, engaging students and faculty in a synergistic approach to learning. This interactive session involves participants in exercises and the consideration of guiding questions for program redesign.
This was a presentation used in a session at ULearn11. For more information on the framework/consultation process, please go to: http://www.vln.school.nz/pg/groups/19837/elearning-planning-framework/
Digital Badging: Student-Curated Evidence of LearningNiesha Ziehmke
Overview of the Co-Curricular Digital Badging Pilot at LaGuardia Community College. Goal: To explore the technological needs to implement a badging system at the college; translate student achievements to other stakeholders; help students better understand their own skill set and potential career paths; and create future leaders. Funded in part by Title V: Project Avanzar and Lumina's Comprehensive Student Record Initiative.
TEAM 2016 - Open Badges and Language LearningDon Presant
Presentation adapted for a professional ESL (EAL) audience, in Canada, with examples of Open Badges and ePortfolios for language learners and professional educators alike.
A Window and a Doorway: ePortfolios in Support of Program RedesignGail Matthews-DeNatale
Session Presented in Boston at the 2014 AAEEBL Conference (Association for Authentic, Experiential, Evidence-Based Learning)
Session Abstract: ePortfolios provide a window into student perception, a view that cannot be attained through other means. In 2012 Northeastern’s M.Ed. Program analyzed students’ portfolios to assess their presentation of self and representation of learning. This served as the doorway to redesigning a cohesive curriculum in which portfolio-based signature assignments integrate theory with practice, engaging students and faculty in a synergistic approach to learning. This interactive session involves participants in exercises and the consideration of guiding questions for program redesign.
This was a presentation used in a session at ULearn11. For more information on the framework/consultation process, please go to: http://www.vln.school.nz/pg/groups/19837/elearning-planning-framework/
Digital Badging: Student-Curated Evidence of LearningNiesha Ziehmke
Overview of the Co-Curricular Digital Badging Pilot at LaGuardia Community College. Goal: To explore the technological needs to implement a badging system at the college; translate student achievements to other stakeholders; help students better understand their own skill set and potential career paths; and create future leaders. Funded in part by Title V: Project Avanzar and Lumina's Comprehensive Student Record Initiative.
TEAM 2016 - Open Badges and Language LearningDon Presant
Presentation adapted for a professional ESL (EAL) audience, in Canada, with examples of Open Badges and ePortfolios for language learners and professional educators alike.
Design Patterns for Badge Systems in Higher EducationHans Põldoja
Presentation at the ICWL 2016 - 15th International Conference on Web-based Learning. 26 October 2016, Rome, Italy.
Publication:
Põldoja, H., Jürgens, P., & Laanpere, M. (2016). Design Patterns for Badge Systems in Higher Education. In M. Spaniol, M. Temperini, D.K.W. Chiu, I. Marenzi, & U. Nanni (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 10013, Advances in Web-Based Learning - ICWL 2016 (pp. 40–49). Cham: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_5
This presentation looks at issues that help make online courses successful. This includes learning characteristics, multiple channels for learning, and quality standards.
Essential faculty development attributes: Sloan-C wkshp 2009Alexandra M. Pickett
The Essential Attributes of Faculty Development Programs – Which ones are you missing?
As we approach faculty development from the perspective of the adult learner, we need to take into consideration their characteristics, the context in which their learning is occurring, and the process we plan to use to deliver the education and training (Lawler, 2003). However, most faculty development models are designed as a one-size-fits-all solution. Few development models view faculty as adult learners and typically do not consider their prior knowledge, experiences (Layne et al., 2004), or uniqueness.
With faculty development’s goal of improving the quality of the teaching experience for faculty and students, and using adult learning theory to frame the development program, the task to build an effective program is no small feat. Gone are the one-size-fits all programs with one-time workshops offered sporadically throughout the academic year. What is needed now are faculty development programs that recognize faculty’s vast reservoir of experiences as learners and as teachers in the classroom and to use those experiences on which to build their learning. Also needed is a recognition of faculty’s teaching needs and concerns to make their learning relevant and increase their motivation for learning. The professional development environment needs to be one in which the faculty feel accepted, respected, and supported. The learning activities need to provide opportunities for active participation, reflection, and collaborative inquiry, all within an authentic context. Finally, an individual action plan is needed to put their learning into action, with a structure in place for continued support as they enact changes in their teaching.
Design Patterns for Badge Systems in Higher EducationHans Põldoja
Presentation at the ICWL 2016 - 15th International Conference on Web-based Learning. 26 October 2016, Rome, Italy.
Publication:
Põldoja, H., Jürgens, P., & Laanpere, M. (2016). Design Patterns for Badge Systems in Higher Education. In M. Spaniol, M. Temperini, D.K.W. Chiu, I. Marenzi, & U. Nanni (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 10013, Advances in Web-Based Learning - ICWL 2016 (pp. 40–49). Cham: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_5
This presentation looks at issues that help make online courses successful. This includes learning characteristics, multiple channels for learning, and quality standards.
Essential faculty development attributes: Sloan-C wkshp 2009Alexandra M. Pickett
The Essential Attributes of Faculty Development Programs – Which ones are you missing?
As we approach faculty development from the perspective of the adult learner, we need to take into consideration their characteristics, the context in which their learning is occurring, and the process we plan to use to deliver the education and training (Lawler, 2003). However, most faculty development models are designed as a one-size-fits-all solution. Few development models view faculty as adult learners and typically do not consider their prior knowledge, experiences (Layne et al., 2004), or uniqueness.
With faculty development’s goal of improving the quality of the teaching experience for faculty and students, and using adult learning theory to frame the development program, the task to build an effective program is no small feat. Gone are the one-size-fits all programs with one-time workshops offered sporadically throughout the academic year. What is needed now are faculty development programs that recognize faculty’s vast reservoir of experiences as learners and as teachers in the classroom and to use those experiences on which to build their learning. Also needed is a recognition of faculty’s teaching needs and concerns to make their learning relevant and increase their motivation for learning. The professional development environment needs to be one in which the faculty feel accepted, respected, and supported. The learning activities need to provide opportunities for active participation, reflection, and collaborative inquiry, all within an authentic context. Finally, an individual action plan is needed to put their learning into action, with a structure in place for continued support as they enact changes in their teaching.
Marshal McLuhan said that we shape our tools and then they shape us. This is the imperative for attending to information literacy and technology fluency in education.
November 2011 presentation given at a day-long assessment workshop co-sponsored by NERCOMP and ELI, titled Innovations in Learning: Measuring the Impact
Making Student Learning Visible: Using Concept Map Analysis as an Assessment...Gail Matthews-DeNatale
Poster presented at the May 2015 Conference for Advancing Evidence-Based Teaching, Center for Advancing Learning and Teaching Through Research, Northeastern University, Boston, MA
Diving Deep: Growing the Field of Civic Engagement Practitioner-ScholarsIowa Campus Compact
This session will be an engaging conversation for current and future civic engagement practitioners, practitioner-scholars, and those who support their work. Attendees will be among the first to review and utilize a new publication resource guiding professional development and career advancement for professionals. Attendees will engage in a conversation with a panel about this publication. The discussion will focus on a framework for understanding the competencies needed in the role of community service-learning professional. The session will review four categories, as outlined in the publication: Organizational Manager, Institutional Strategic Leader, Field Contributor, and Community Innovator. In the first half of the session, a panel of practitioners who helped to develop the framework and publication will reflect on their experiences and engage attendees in a discussion of challenges and lessons learned. The second half of the session will allow attendees to utilize this framework in order to think about and plan for their own professional development and the position of their work in the institution and community. Facilitators will lead a process of personal inventory and allow time for discussion and planning of development opportunities for field and career advancement.
Emily Shields
Executive Director
Iowa Campus Compact
Mandi McReynolds
Director of Community Engagement and Service Learning
Drake University
Defining the Role of the Instructional Designer in Higher Education - a look at master's program course requirements and recent vacancy announcements. What should new graduates expect of the workplace? Where can they find the best professional development opportunities
This presentation includes a set of frameworks, steps, and worksheets for developing institutional student learning outcomes tied to community/civic engagement.
The Non-Disposable Assignment: Enhancing Personalised Learning - Session 2Michael Paskevicius
Slides from our second meeting of three from a course redesign series on creating non-disposable assignments.
As advertised:
Do you want to offer students an opportunity to bring their passions, personal interests, and individual strengths into their coursework?
How can we design assessment which students feel connected to, value, and are proud to share with their peers?
Are you interested in learning how to create a non-disposable assignment for your students?
This 3-part assignment redesign workshop will take you through the steps to create a non-disposable assignment from beginning to end.
Disposable Assignments: "are assignments that students complain about doing and faculty complain about grading. They’re assignments that add no value to the world – after a student spends three hours creating it, a teacher spends 30 minutes grading it, and then the student throws it away” (Wiley, 2013).
This series is about creating a non-disposable assignment. The three sessions will blend a combination of some pre-reading, discussion, and in session time to flesh out the details of a rich assignment that allows students to co-create knowledge, be creative and engage in a personalised learning experience.
We’ll focus on crafting projects which meet your existing or redesigned course learning outcomes, explore tools for students to demonstrate their learning, and identify strategies for conducting peer-review. In the end you’ll end up with plan for implementing your redesigned assignment in Spring 2018 or Fall 2018.
Throughout the three-part workshop we will also be collectively exposing our own learnings to others in the group through a live reflection and blogging site to support our work. We hope faculty can attend all three parts as they are planned with the intent you are coming for the whole series.
Facilitating in and with the Fully Online Learning Community (FOLC) Modelrolandv
Participants will explore how fully online facilitation assists learners in the construction of new
procedural and declarative knowledge.
Concepts discussed will include:
● Constructivism-informed Education Processes
● Reduction of transactional distance
● Collaborative processes
● Principles of PBL Online Facilitation (Savin-Baden, 2007)
Creating Engaging Student Communities in the Online Classroom, Karen Lyndenkarenlynden
This session will focus on instructor strategies that create extraordinary student learning experiences in the online class environment. Techniques that will be explored include best practices for creating dynamic group projects, service-learning projects connected to learning outcomes, and other project-based based assignments that help build the student learning community in the class and beyond. Implementation strategies and examples of effective assignments will be shared.
Presenter(s): Karen Lynden (Rowan-Cabarrus CC)
Enhancing and Assessing Your Work-Based Learning PlanNAFCareerAcads
Does your academy’s work-based learning plan need to be fine-tuned? Participants will learn how to integrate a four-year, sequenced work-based learning plan into the curriculum, involve advisory boards to enhance the plan
and measure quality and effectiveness.
Presenter:
Laura Fidler,
National Academy Foundation
A day-long workshop conducted with the faculty of Wheelock College on June 27, 2014
Companion website is located at
https://northeastern.digication.com/blened_learning_workshop
Enhancing School Community through Technology Professional Development for Te...Kendra Minor
This presentation provides an overview of the roles and responsibilities of each collaborative partner; narrative about the process used to analyze, design, develop, implement and evaluate the professional development workshop; and the tools and community generated by the collaborative.
Presentation given for a panel presentation at the AAC&U 2019 meeting. Abstract: In this panel presentation, three institutions explored how ePortfolio curriculum prompts new ways of thinking about education. In Northeastern University’s online master’s education program, students draw from and transform their earlier “learning ePortfolios” into professional ePortfolios showing accomplishment and career readiness. Key to this transition are four critical moves: remembering, analyzing, envisioning, and synthesizing. In Florida State University’s Rhetoric and Composition ePortfolio, a signature practice is selection, supported by an ePortfolio curatorial process helping students make decisions about what’s to select for the ePortfolio and what to leave behind. Across all three programs, students report that these supportive practices are fundamental.
What can we learn about ePortfolio programs by listening to graduates?Gail Matthews-DeNatale
AAC&U 2017 Presentation Abstract: The ePortfolio community has long been dedicated to documenting, analyzing, and communicating the value of ePortfolios in higher education. But what happens to our students after they graduate? How do alumni perceive the value of their ePortfolio experience? Do they incorporate evidence-based, multimodal, and metacognitive practices into their daily life and work, and if so in what ways? What other insights might they share? This session will present the prominent themes that emerged during interviews and email exchanges with graduates from Northeastern University and Florida State University. The session will also include time for attendees to explore how they might incorporate alumni outreach into their own ePortfolio work and research.
Presentation on the use of digital storytelling as a strategy for crating digital cases. Given to the Harvard Business School Brain Gain Speaker series in August 2007.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
1. Are We Who We Think We Are?
ePortfolios as a Tool for Curriculum Redesign
Gail Matthews-DeNatale, Ph.D.
Graduate School of Education
Northeastern University
College of Professional Studies
2013 Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning
2. Materials Online
• Presentation Slides/Notes
• Guiding Questions for Redesign
– Questions that informed our process
– Definition of terms
– Links to ePortfolio practices, examples, tutorials
• Connect to Learning Executive Summary
– Site to be unveiled at AAC&U in January 2014
2
3. Agenda
• Backdrop: ePortfolio Landscape
• Underpinnings: Catalyst Framework
• Northeastern Case Study:
– Program Context
– Role of ePortfolios in Process
– Redesigned Curriculum
• General features
• Example: eLearning Design Concentration
3
4. Quick Poll
How many of you …
• Incorporate ePortfolio work into your teaching?
• Have an ePortfolio requirement in your program?
• Teach in an institution that requires ePortfolios?
• Are a staff member who supports ePortfolios?
4
5. The ePortfolio Landscape
What is an ePortfolio?
What are the types of ePortfolios?
What’s the state of ePs as a field of study?
5
6. What is an ePortfolio?
Portfolio
purposeful collection + student work + reflection
(Paulson, F.L. Paulson, P.R. and Meyer, 1991)
ePortfolio = all of the above …
+ web-based
+ multiple formats and media
+ links, non-linear pathways
+ capacity to share with a larger audience
(Polklop, 2013)
6
8. Landscape: Types of ePortfolios
Northeastern CALTR –
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Employment
Showcase
Professional Development
Developmental
Reflective
Project
Collaborative
8
9. Landscape: Types of ePortfolios
Stony brook Division of Information Technology
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Learning
Assessment for Learning
Showcase
Course
Program
Career and Internship
Teaching
Personal
9
10. Landscape: Types of ePortfolios
Cornell Academic Technologies
• Developmental (work in progress)
• Reflective (development of understanding)
• Representational (accomplishments)
Can be
• Standardized (aids assessment & comparison)
• Personalized (increases expression and ownership)
10
19. Landscape Indicators
Established community of practice
Tipping point in recognition and support
Key strategy for supporting learning
in a connected and digital world
19
20. Central Question
What strategies and approaches do successful
ePortfolio campuses employ to launch, build, and
sustain their ePortfolio implementations?
20
24. Defining Terms: Centrality of Design
Design Principle: A fundamental idea about good
practice. A concept that informs the organization
and structure of a process. When applied with
finesse, the principle improves the quality and
outcome.
(Connect to Learning, 2014)
24
25. Defining Terms: Core Design Principles
• Inquiry
Investigate, ask questions, grapple with ambiguity
• Reflection
Analyze experience, identify patterns, create meaning
• Integration
Make connections, transfer knowledge across
domains
25
26. Inquiry: Questions to Consider
• Who are our students?
(strengths, challenges, motivations, goals)
• What does our program look like to them?
• What meaning are they making of our program?
• How do we know?
26
27. Case Study: M.Ed. By The Numbers
Size
~470 Active Students
Profile
+60% attend part time
Format
65% fully online
29% more than half online
Concentrations
4
Gender
73% female
Region
56% in state, 44% out of state
27
28.
29. Preliminary Questions
If we ask these students to document and
reflect upon their learning in an ePortfolio, what
will they do with it?
29
30. Preliminary Questions
If we ask these students to document and
reflect upon their learning in an ePortfolio, what
will they do with it?
How is this similar or different from what we
hope they would do with it?
30
35. Mission Statement
By pursuing a Master's degree, you are in a process
of – metaphorically speaking – writing the next
chapter in the story of your life. Your courses are
one part of that process. You construct meaning on
your journey, considering how your program informs
and shapes personal and professional goals.
Your ePortfolio is designed to help you document
this narrative of growth to see how parts relate
to the whole. We believe it will help you improve
the quality of your learning experience, both
during and after your time in the program.
35
36. Pre-Retreat Questions
1. What can you tell about the person's background,
motivation, goals, and aspirations? How does this
compare with your understanding of the profiles of
students who enroll in our programs?
2. Looking at the person's work samples, what appear
to be the areas of strength and need? How could
that be addressed?
3. Given the strengths and challenges that you observe
in the ePortfolios, what do our students need to
thrive, both in our programs and after graduation? What
are the implications for program improvement?
36
37. Reflection: We are Not Who We Think We Are
Many Were
1. Inexperienced
2. Unrealistic expectations
3. Not making connections
4. Not articulating professional identity
37
39. Reflection: Questions to Consider
What contributions are you preparing students to
make to society and/or to their profession?
What expertise, abilities, and characteristics will
the graduates of your program need to be able to
make these contributions?
39
40. Reflection: Questions to Consider
What contributions are you preparing students to
make to society and/or to their profession?
What expertise, abilities, and characteristics will
the graduates of your program need to be able to
make these contributions?
40
41. Integration: Revised Curriculum
Characteristics
Intentional: Mission and Competencies
Cohesive: Gateway + courses designed in relationship
Authentic: Signature Assignments, Experiential Learning
Reflective: ePortfolio, professional development/presence
41
43. Intentional
Program Mission
The Master of Education
program at Northeastern
University develops
educators with the skills
and intellectual acumen to
be effective, to question
systemic norms, and to
anticipate and shape a
more equitable, globally
connected society.
http://www.flickr.co
m/photos/photonqua
ntique/
43
47. Example: eLearning Design Concentration
Equips graduates to
anticipate and shape
the future of next
generation learning
in a technology rich,
globally connected
society.
(Images combined)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/adesigna
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sharehows
47
48. eLID Curriculum
Foundation
Courses
Ed as Field of Study
How People Learn
Models for
Learning Design
Professional
Learning
Plan
Connecting
Theory with
Practice
Design as Collab.
Profession
Capstone
Social Media
Revise/Present
Work to Others
Review Portfolio
Plan Project
Tech. as Medium
for Learning
Professional
Portfolio
Experiential
Learning
Proposal
Experiential
Learning
Work
Professional
Integration
& Presence
Learning Portfolio
Open Learning
Showcase Portfolio
48
49. eLID Curriculum
Foundation
Courses
Design as Collab.
Profession
Capstone
How People Learn
Connecting
Theory with
Practice
Social Media
Revise/Present
Work to Others
Models for Learning
Design
Review Portfolio
Plan Project
Tech. as Medium
for Learning
Professional
Portfolio
Professional
Learning
Plan
Experiential
Learning
Proposal
Experiential
Learning
Work
Professional
Integration
& Presence
Ed as Field of Study
Learning Portfolio
Open Learning
Showcase Portfolio
49
50. eLID Curriculum
Foundation
Courses
Ed as Field of Study
How People Learn
Models for
Learning Design
Professional
Learning
Plan
Connecting
Theory with
Practice
Review Portfolio
Plan Project
Experiential
Learning
Proposal
Learning Portfolio
Design as Collab.
Profession
Capstone
Social Media
Revise/Present
Work to Others
Open Learning
Tech. as Medium
for Learning
Professional
Portfolio
Experiential
Learning
Work
Professional
Integration
& Presence
Showcase Portfolio
50
51. eLID Curriculum
Foundation
Courses
Ed as Field of Study
Design as a
Collaborative
Profession
Connecting
Theory with
Practice
Open Learning
Revise/Present
Work to Others
Review Portfolio
Plan Project
Technology as
Medium for
Learning
Professional
Portfolio
Experiential
Learning
Proposal
Experiential
Learning
Work
Professional
Integration
& Presence
How People Learn
Models for
Learning Design
Professional
Learning
Plan
Social Media
Capstone
Learning Portfolio
Showcase Portfolio
51
52. eLID Curriculum
Foundation
Courses
Ed as Field of Study
Connecting
Theory with
Practice
Design as Collab.
Profession
Review Portfolio
Plan Project
Tech. as Medium
for Learning
Experiential
Learning
Proposal
Experiential
Learning
Work
How People Learn
Models for
Learning Design
Professional
Learning
Plan
Learning Portfolio
Social Media
Open Learning
Capstone
Revise/Present Work
to Others
Professional Portfolio
Professional
Integration
& Presence
Showcase Portfolio
52
53. eLID Curriculum
Foundation
Courses
Ed as Field of Study
Connecting
Theory with
Practice
Design as Collab.
Profession
Capstone
Social Media
Revise/Present
Work to Public
Review Portfolio
Plan Project
Tech. as Medium
for Learning
Professional
Portfolio
Experiential
Learning
Proposal
Experiential
Learning
Work
Professional
Integration
& Presence
How People Learn
Models for
Learning Design
Professional
Learning
Plan
Learning Portfolio
Open Learning
Showcase Portfolio
53
54. eLID Curriculum
Foundation
Courses
Ed as Field of Study
Connecting
Theory with
Practice
Design as Collab.
Profession
Capstone
Social Media
Revise/Present
Work to Public
Review Portfolio
Plan Project
Tech. as Medium
for Learning
Professional
Portfolio
Experiential
Learning
Proposal
Experiential
Learning
Work
Professional
Integration
& Presence
How People Learn
Models for
Learning Design
Professional
Learning
Plan
Learning Portfolio
Open Learning
Showcase
Portfolio
54
55. Cohesive
Course content, concepts,
assessments, and discussion
can easily be forgotten or lost if
one is not challenged to reflect.
The ePortfolio empowered me
to synthesize material.
I can easily access information from previous
courses, enabling me to make connections and
get the most out of the program. – Travis D.
56. Authentic
I am very pleased with my group
project results -- even more so
that we could take the module we
developed and, with very little
tweaking, put it to use in our own
settings. I have an opportunity to
play a pivotal role in redefining
education at my workplace.
I’m very grateful for the knowledge I received
and the two colleagues and Professor who helped
shape my knowledge in this area. – Michael W.
56
57. Reflective
I am able to share my learning in
a colorful, creative way. This
format allows me to bring words
to life, allowing my reader to see
inside my journey and not just
words on a paper. Some images
and videos I chose to include convey meanings
that are otherwise hard to capture. The use of
video allows me to speak my ideas to my
audience. Through my voice you hear my passion
and purpose for my work. – Stefanie H.
57
58. Redesigned Program’s Distinctiveness
• Integrates practice with scholarship
• Embraces next generation online and mobile
learning
• Explores lifelong learning and global contexts
• Generates a portfolio of exemplary work that
demonstrates vision and leadership in the field
58
59. Final Question
Based on your response to the questions posed
during this presentation and in the handout,
what one thing could you do differently …
• in the courses that you teach?
• in your program?
• in your role within your institution?
59
60. Thank You!
Gail Matthews-DeNatale
Northeastern Graduate School of
Education Senior Faculty
Concentration Lead for the M.Ed.
in eLearning Design
g.matthews-denatale@neu.edu
http://northeastern.digication.com/gails_eportfolio
60
Editor's Notes
The field of ePortfolios is as much about questions as it is about answers.I’ll be pausing periodically during this presentation to give you time to reflect on key questions. They are also included the handout, along with the definition of key terms. You might want to jot down notes on the back of the handout, because depending on the time I might also ask you to share your thoughts with your neighbor
Using the metaphor of a artist, I want to spend a few minutes painting the landscape that serves as a backdrop for the many things that we will discuss today. Questions that we will consider includeWhat is an ePortfolio?What are the types of ePortfolios?What’s the state of ePs as a field of study?
Portfolios are not new – they’ve been part of art education and writing education for many years.As Peter Elbow says, if you automatically learned from experience, all old people would be smart. You learn from reflecting on experienceThe web format makes it possible to explicitly link the learning that takes pace inside/outside school, at the workplace, etc.The multimedia format makes it possible to reflect different ways of knowing, and to take a holistic approach to many modes of “communication”It’s important to note that most eP software allows the author to set levels of access, from public to within school to privateFor example, a portfolio could be private during the early phases while a student is documenting learning, and then gradually made more public as they develop and improveYou can also have more than one portfolio – more than one audience
How we talk about ePortfolios is a work-in-progress.ePortfolios can be many things, and we often invoke the proverb about the blind people and the elephant. What you think an ePortfolio is depends on your touchpoint. But here are some frameworks that resonate with me, starting with ones that include many dimensions and winnowing down to the most streamlined typologies.
Northeastern Center for Advancing Teaching and Learning Through ResearchPresentation developed by Laurie Poklop, who did her dissertation on ePortfolios at Northeastern. Her recent work focuses on ePortfolios as a new genre of writing (or genres of writing, because depending on the scenario there are different audiences)This schema focuses on the many uses to which an ePortfolio can be put. It also has implications for the viewership, sense of audience, and representation of self.Some are self-focused, such as those for reflection, developmental learning, professional development, and imply assessment interactions with programs and faculty.Some imply extensive work with peers, such as the project or collaborative portfolios. Some are externally facing, such as the showcase and employment portfolio.
Stony Brook’s representation also focuses on uses. It bears much in common with the Northeastern schema, but there are notable additions such as the teaching portfolioThere is also evidence of the academic purpose (e.g. assessment) in addition to the audience (career)Division of Information TechnologyLearningAssessment for LearningShowcaseCourseProgramCareer and InternshipTeachingPersonal
Cornell Academic Technologies starts to winnow things down and focus on the goal. Developmental (work in progress) Reflective (development of understanding)Representational (accomplishments) More important, their typology includes a distinction in ePortfolio structure (standardized or personalized)Standardized (aids assessment & comparison)Personalized (increases expression and ownership)CLICK TO NEXT SLIDE BEFORE TALKING ABOUT THIS
Just want to take a moment to point out the inherent tension between the two approaches:standardized and personalizedHelen Barrett Pointed out the challenges in her 2009 piece on “Balancing the Two Faces of ePortfolios” StandardizedAids evaluation & comparison – makes the process easier for teachers, programs, and accreditors, and licensing boardsGives the impression that the ePortfolio is determined by the institutionPersonalizedIncreases creative expression, engagement, and sense of ownership by the studentGives the impression that the ePortfolio is determined by the authorWe need both for ePortfolios to achieve their potential for improving learning (for students and programs)We absolutely need both -- The question is how to do one in conjunction with the other … we’ll revisit this later when we get to the case study portion of this presentation
I’ll undoubtedly leave out key players, but I think it’s helpful to approach this as a vibrant community that includes many wonderful colleagues.The slides are available online, so you don’t have to worry about getting all the citations down just right
No review of leadership would be complete without mention of Dr. Helen Barrett and her generous contributionsAs I mentioned before, she is the one who first pointed out the “two faces” of ePortfolios, and the importance that we maintain a structure that allows students to find intrinsic investment and motivationHas been involved with ePortfolios since 1991Retired from the faculty of the College of Education at the University of Alaska Anchorage http://electronicportfolios.org
It’s VERY hard to choose, but if you are new to ePortfolios here are a few recent publications to check outTracy Penny Light, Helen Chen, John Ittelson, Documenting Learning with ePortfolios, 2011, Jossey BassProvides a basic introduction, orientation, and recommended processeshttp://www.amazon.com/Documenting-Learning-ePortfolios-College-Instructors/dp/0470636203
International Journal of ePortfolioFounded in 2011 Edward Watson of Virginia TechPeer Reviewed, Open Online Journal that focuses on ePortfolio Researchhttp://www.theijep.com
Melissa Peet – Integrative Knowledge Portfolio ProcessIKPP is equal parts publication and workshop processDescribes a process for engaging learners reflection on and articulation of defining learning experiences, leading to a professional portfolio that is organized around core strengths instead of courses and categories of work.Published in 2011 and available through MedEdPortal - https://www.mededportal.org/publication/7892
International Coalition for Electronic Portfolio Research (IN/CEPR) - Founded in 2004 - http://ncepr.orgResearches the impact of ePortfolios on student learning and educational outcomes.Cohort model –institutions apply and, if selected, participate in a three-year cohort, each with its own research project. Central questions : "What learning is taking place as a function of electronic portfolios?" and "How do we know?” Leadership:Barbara Cambridge, National Council of Teachers of English, USAKathleen Yancey, Florida State UniversityDarren Cambridge, American Institutes for Research
Association for Authentic, Experiential and Evidence-Based Learning (AAEEBL, pronounced "able"), founded in 2008 Founded in 2008 by Trent Batson and Judy Williamson Batson. Trent was also one of the earliest leaders in the field of ePsFocuses on the body of theory and practice that is developing around ePortfoliosTheir annual conference, held in Boston each summer, is one of the largest events focused on ePortfolios in the country
These initiatives represent a community of practicededicated to discerning ePortfolio learning principles, design practices, and impact. They alsoindicate that the field has reached a tipping point in the recognition and support for ePortfolioswithin higher education. Within this context, ePortfolios extend the boundaries of learninglandscape beyond the confines of courses, programs, and schoolsthey are an essentialcomponent to supporting learning in a connected, integrated, and digital world.With this landscape in mind, consider connect to learning, the project that has most informed our work
Enter Connect to Learning, the framework that has influenced our work in Education at Northeastern’s College of Professional Studies the most.An executive summary about the program and its findings is on the chairs. A link to the project’s website, which goes live in January 2014, is also included in the handout we distributed.3-year FIPSE-funded project that began in 2011Coordinated by LaGuardia's Making Connections National Resource Center in partnership with AAEEBLOther key players are the AAC&U, whose VALUE rubrics informed much of the assessment work
24 participating institutionsEach kept a program portfolio to document and reflect on their work with ePortfolios, and to share research. We shared our work every 6-8 weeks in the context of a “jam.”Jam = structure for sharing, discussion, and knowledge creation in a community of interestEach of us given a topic to write about in our institutional ePs and to upload documents/examples that illustrate our work. For example, how do you approach faculty professional learning? To what extent is social learning part of your work with ePs (social pedagogy)?Tour each others’ portfoliosFeedback, discussion, revision in an asynch threaded discussionRevise ePortfoliosC2L researchers (Randy Bass of Georgetown, Helen Chen of Stanford)and Bret Eynon, JuditTorokand the rest of the team LGCC, Laura Gambino of Guttman Community CollegeCombed through the portfolios (work samples, institutional data, documented practices, reflections, peer feedback, discussions)The catalyst framework that you see was developed our of that research
The framework integrates people (faculty, students, support staff), institutions (missions and programs), dimensions that are key to success (e.g., professional development), and design principlesAs you can see, it is rich and interconnected, similar to a mandala. We don’t have time to go into every sector today. I encourage you to read the executive summary that’s included in the brochures that I handed out. I’ve also uploaded this brochure to the conference materials.Please also check out the Catalyst website when it opens in January 2014. A link to the site is included in the other handout. In addition to explaining the model in depth, he site includes almost a hundred stories and promising practices that were contributed by the participating institutions.
This presentation’s case study of ePortfolios as a tool for curriculum redesign is structured around the Catalyst’s outer rimThe Design Principles of Inquiry, Reflection, and IntegrationThis framework best describes the way that we used ePortfolios as a driver for our program’s redesign
According to C2L, Design Principle: A fundamental idea about good practice. A concept that informs the organization and structure of a process. When applied with finesse, the principle improves the quality and outcome.Term borrowed from the field of visual design. So often we are “in the weeds” with learning design – focused on specific strategies and assignments. Design principles make it possible for us to step back and consider the elements of design that are generalizable and transferable to other contexts and use scenarios.
If we believe that these Design Principles are fundamental to effective learning for students, as educators shouldn’t we also incorporate them into our processes for learning and improvement of our curriculua, programs, and institutions?Inquiry: Investigate, ask questions, grapple with ambiguityReflection: Analyze experience to identify patterns and create meaningIntegration: Make connections that transfer knowledge across domains
INQUIRY – These are the questions we started withBefore I launch into our case study, I want to give you a minute to consider how you would answer these questions about the students in your own program or institutionTurn to your neighbor – take two minutes to confer. I’ll hold you to that time frame because we have much to talk about.Note also that you don’t need to have answers, as these are the starting point for inquiry.
Here’s one picture of the students in our Masters program, and it provides us with some useful information.Four concentrations: Higher Education Administration, Learning and Instruction (K12), Special Education, and eLearning Design470 graduate students60% part-time, 40% full-time (implies that many are working)94% of the students take half or more of their courses online, and most are fully online.Almost equal in state and out of state, made possible through the online format
What’s missing from the picture when we only look at numbers? What is their self-conceptualization? Their motivations? Their goals?
If we ask these students to document and reflect upon their learning in an ePortfolio, what will they would do with it?
If we ask these students to document and reflect upon their learning in an ePortfolio, what will they would do with it? How is this similar or different from what we hope they would do with it?
Here’s what one of our students did with it. Note that this screenshot has been used with the student’s permission. It’s exemplary. We will talk later about the findings from ePortfolios that were not stellar, but out of respect for those authors I will not show screenshots of less than stellar work,What’s important to this student? ePortfolios are a self description that provides a window into student self-perception, She has included an audio introduction in addition to her written introduction. She wants to communicate in a range of media formatsWe can tell that travel is important to her, and that through her travels she became a mentor to a woman in El SalvadorHer definition of “learning” extends beyond the classroom (formal learning) to include nonformal experiences, and so she’s added a section about that to her portfolioShe wants to be “that teacher” who is remembered and who makes a difference – but most of her depiction of teaching involves knowledge transfer. She has created a section that includes her lesson plans
That’s just one portfolio. It provides insight into the individual student that could be very valuable to faculty and advisors.What happens when we view the portfolios in aggregate, as a body of work?What do they tell us about our community of learners?How can we use the process of inquiry to ask questions,look for patterns, grapple with the implications of their difference and similarity, andconsider what they need from us?
The redesign process provides the organizing principle for the case study that follows
Remember the push-me-pull-you?In the beginning, we gave them a rudimentary ePortfolio template and asked them to incorporate at least one piece of work from every course into itThe template that we provided was relatively unstructured, but included embedded questions designed to guide reflection. It bears some features of the standardized portfolio, such as the “my program” section, but the approach was predominantly personalized
We also provided students with a mission statement for the ePortfolio initiative that was made available on an ePortfolio resource site and distributed via email.By pursuing a Master's degree, you are in a process of – metaphorically speaking – writing the next chapter in the story of your life. Your courses are one part of that process. You construct meaning on your journey, considering how your program informs and shapes personal and professional goals.Your ePortfolio is designed to help you document this narrative of growth to see how parts relate to the whole. We believe it will help you improve the quality of your learning experience, both during and after your time in the program.
Each person was given seven portfolios to review. The portfolio liaison examined all the portfolios. They were given these questions to guide their review:What can you tell about the person (then look at the collection of 7 for patternsWhat appear to be her/his areas of strength and need? (focus on the work) 3. Given the strengths and challenges that you observe in the ePortfolio, what does the person need to thrive, both in our programs and after graduation? What are your thoughts about helping the person grow as a reflective practitioner and as an agent of change? Comparing that with your understanding of our programs, what do you think we need to emphasize, keep the same, decrease, or add in the curriculum? What other suggestions do you have for program improvement?
Note that you can get some of this information from application essays, but those are often developed with the help of friends and editors. In addition, essays are usually used to assess the individual, not to gain perspective on the student body.1. More inexperienced than we thought2. Working, but not in desired professionInterested in “breaking into the business”3. Unrealistic expectations for what the degree would qualify them to doThought they could become a provost4. Not making connections across courses and across work/schoolUnclear in sense of priorities, self-assessment of strengths/weaknesses, rationale for the degree4. Not articulating a professional identity – presenting themselves as professionalsTell the story of one student who started with a picture of her wedding, then added a picture of herself at work, and then finally moved both into another location – speaks to the process of identity and professional presence
Unclear sense of audience?Facebook Culture?Needed more guidance and scaffolding on the Inquiry, reflection, and integration process (metacognition)Probably all three. In a professional program, to what extent are we accountable for helping our students articulate their development, communicate the linkages, and consider their professional presence? In other words, is it okay to use Facebook as a get out of jail free card?Image sources, creative commons permission:http://www.flickr.com/photos/mereteveianhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/sidereal
Before I tell you how we integrated acted upon the results of our inquiry, I want to give you a minute to consider ---
We took the many ideas, similar to those that you just brainstormed, and used a yellow stickie process to post, sort, group, consolidate, and articulate our most important competencies. Here’s what we came up withImage Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/38869431@N00/3703735824/
As you can see, the features of our redesigned curriculum map to the gaps and concerns that we identified in our students’ portfoliosI’ll give a brief overview, and then provide specific examples and a description of how the redesign plays out in the curriculum of the eLearning Design concentrationCohesive: Gateway + courses designed in relationshipIntentional: Mission and CompetenciesAuthentic: Signature Assignments, Experiential LearningReflective: ePortfolio, professional development/presence
A graduate of the Masters Program is a Systems Thinker Communicator Creative Problem SolverCulturally Responsive Note that we elaborated on these in the redesign documents, and that each concentration also has a mission statement and competencies
The Master of Education program at Northeastern University develops educators with the skills and intellectual acumen to be effective, to question systemic norms, and to anticipate and shape a more equitable, globally connected society.Image source:http://www.flickr.com/photos/photonquantique/
Designed to help think of the experience as entry into a professional field that includesCommunities of interest and inquiryProfessional organizationsVenues such as Sloan-C and JALN in which controversies and problems are identified, researched, and debatedUsing inquiry, reflection, and integration to improve practice.Because this course exists and is a gateway, we can draw on the expertise they’ve already gained in subsequent coursesIMPORTANT TO STRESSIS a five credit course in which they are oriented to both the pedagogy and the technology of ePortfolios, and our vision for their learning in the program. They learn about terms such as “competency,” “signature assignment,” etc.
Each course has one or two signature assignments that are 1) authentic work to the profession, 2) connect theory with practice, and 3) are designed to evidence competencies. They incorporate the signature assignment, often with a written reflection, into their ePortfolios. This is the final piece of work in each course – faculty view and assess the signature assignment within the larger context of their goals and other courseworkA signature assignment in one course can be revisited in future courses. For example, informational interviews in one course can be revisited in planning opportunities for experiential learning. The module developed in one course can be revisited to develop learning objects that are embedded in the module.
Redesigned ePortfolio template embeds the competenciesHowever, this is not a standardized portfolio that takes a grid/checklist approach. It merely places the competencies in closer proximity so that students can reflect upon their progress.It strives to strike a balance between making our vision for their learning explicit and providing them with space to make it “their own”
eLearning Design Concentration – A connectivist and design-centered approach focused on vision and leadershipTo take the kind of outside-the-box to learning design that we believe we are modelinganticipate and shape the future of next generation learning in a technology rich, globally connected societyprepares its graduates to shape the future of any organization whose mission involves learning, including corporate, non-profit, higher education, K-12, and government. Participants explore fundamental principles of learning & design engaging online and mobile environments, develop new models and strategies for motivating learners, andrespond innovatively to societal and institutional changes that impact the field of online and mobile education.(Images combined)http://www.flickr.com/photos/adesignaand http://www.flickr.com/photos/sharehows
This visual serves as a metaphor for the program. The blue circles are clouds of content, concepts, skills, and theories – the formal curriculumThe triangles are the forest through which you will journey, the professional workin which you put learning into practiceePortfolio serves a different purpose, depending on where they are in the program, but it also provides continuityIt’s the ground that supports the passage – also helpful for connecting school & work.
As mentioned before, in Education as an Advanced Field of Study students learn how to access research to keep your finger on the pulse of recent developments in the field, and how to use research to improve practice. This is also where they become oriented to the portfolio componentIn the second course, How People Learn, they take a look at the program competencies, consider strengths and opportunities for growth, and develop a professional learning plan. Instead of being handed a grid or rubric (standards-based eP), they use the research skills they gained in Ed as Advanced to investigate publications and studies on the profession, flesh out their own rubric – in this way they have an opportunity to make the competencies their own. The goal is to strike a balance between standards and professional personalization.
1/3 of the way through your program, they take a course entitled “connecting theory with practice” during which they Review portfolio of work, consider what have learned about eLearning research and theory, Work with faculty and an employer to develop an experiential learning plan for a significant piece of work to complete as their biggest accomplishment in the program. They can elect to do this with your current employer, orwe will help them connect with a professional setting to do this work.
They carry outexperiential work independentlyfor the duration of the program, in parallel with your other courses, but they won’t be totally on their own. As with C2L’s partner portfoliosThey document your work in eP and the program holds periodic virtual gatherings – Using a process similar to C2L’s Jam structureto share work, discuss discoveries and challenges with both peers and faculty, & receive feedbackIt’s called Online Experiential Learning or Virtual Co-op
During the capstone coursethey bring it all together. They will use Melissa Peet’s Integrative Knowledge Portfolio workshop process to turn their program-based portfolio into a portfolio that speaks to their core professional strengths This also includes consideration of their presence and substance in social media – which can also be embedded in their portfolios. If they choose to port it to another platform that is okay, too.They Presenting their experiential work with peers, faculty, employers, and even the general public if they wish.
The portfolio process is designed to help students synthesize the formative work that they create during the program….
And develop an integrated, contextually cognizant, andself-aware professional presence that includes exemplary work
Here are comments made by students that echo the themes in the redesigned programTravisattests to the power of this method, explaining it allowed him to make COHESIVE connections and get more out of the program.
The signature assignments are authenticas Michael says, the Masters Program work is helping his institution rethink how they approach educationIn this instance, he worked with a team to develop a module or workshop designed to help subject matter experts and instructional designers in a corporate setting learn how to work together synergistically.The module was submitted to the course on Saturday, and he implemented it at his workplace on Monday
Emphasis on connectionsIn this quote Stephanie speaks to the many ways that knowledge can be formed and represented, considering new ways to reflect upon and communicate her thinking
I didn’t mention this at the beginning of the case study, but when we developed our program/concentration mission statements and competencies, we also articulated the distinctiveness that we desired for our program
Based on your response to the questions posed during this presentation, the Catalyst framework, and the other handout, what one thing could you do differently … in the courses that you teach? in your program? in your role within your institution?
We’ve covered a lot of ground in a short time, so please don’t hesitate to drop me a line or give me a call if you have additional questions about our program.