http://www.free-powerpoint-templates-design.com
Skin sensitisation (OECD. 406)
Prepared by:
Momin Asran Zunnurain Khalid Ak
Guided by: Dr. Aman B. Upganalwar
M. PHARM FIRST YEAR
(department of pharmacology)
SNJB’s SSDJ College of Pharmacy, Chandwad
Skin Sensitisation(OECD GUIDELINE NO. 406)
INTRODUCTION:
• Skin sensitisation is defined as allergic response to a
substance after skin contact.
• Sensitisation is a immune system respose to chemical.
• Symptoms of sensitisation are often seen in skin.
• There are two type of animal use
1. Guinea Pig
2. Mouse
Guinea Pig
Two type of test:
1. Freuds complete adjuvants
(Guinea Pig Maximisation test)
2. Non adjuvants test
(Buehler test)
In the original guideline 406,
Four adjuvants test and three non adjuvants test
Mouse
Immune system of the mouse has been investigated more
extensive than that of the Guinea pig
Advantages – short duration and minimal animal treatment
Example:
1. Mouse ear swelling test
2. Local lymph node assay
Guinea pig maximisation test
• The guinea pig maximisation test (GPMT) is an in
vivo test to screen for substance that cause human
skin sensitisation (i.e. Allergens)
• It was first proposed by B. Magnussom and albert
kligman in 1669 and described in their 1970 book
contact dermatitis in the guinea pi
General principle of sensitisation test
• The test animal are initially exposed to the test substance by
intra dermal injection and epidermal application
• Following a rest period of 10 to 14 days during which an
immune response developed, the animal are exposed to a
challange dose
• The degree of skin reaction to the challange exposure in test
animal is compared with control group animals
Element common to sensitisation test in
Guinea Pig
01
Guinea pig
Animal
03 250-500g
Body weight
05 Temperature=20℃
HR=30-70%
12hrs light & 12hrs dark
Housing
02 Male
Female (non pregnant)
Sex
04 At least 5 days prior to
the test
Acclimatization
06
Feeding
Method
NUMBER OF ANIMAL
A minimum of 10 animal are used in the treatment group and at least 5
animals in the control group are used
(20 test and 10 control)
INDUCTION: INTRADERMAL INJECTION
Day 0 – treated group
1. Three pair of intradermal injection are given in the shoulder region
1/1 mixture of FCA/water or saline
2. Test substance in an appropriate vehicle at the selected concentration
3. Test substance in a 1/1mixture of FCA/water or saline
Day 0 – control group
Control groupe also receive three intradermal injection, but only vehicle
is used
Day 5-7: Treated and control group
24 hrs before topical application,
The test area after close clipping or saving painted with 0.5 ml of 10%
sod lauryl sulphate In Vaseline, in order to creat a local irritation
Day 6-8 : treated group
Shaving
Test substance applied to test area for 48 hrs
Day 6-8 : control group
Shaving
Only vehicle are applied in similar manner for 48 hrs
Day 20-22 : treated and control group
A patches loaded with test substance is applied to flank of animal
And
A patches loaded with vehicle is applied to other side of flank
For 24 hrs
Observation : treated and control group
Remove patch after 24 hrs
Clean area after 21 hrs of patch removal
Observe after 3 hrs (appropriate 48 hrs after challange)
Approximately 24 hrs after this observation A second observation 72 hrs
Scale for the evaluation of challenge patch
test reaction
3=Intense
erythema and
swelling
2=Moderate erythema
1=Discrete or patchy
erythema
0=No visible change
Rechallenge
• If it is necessary to clarify the results obtaine
d in the first challenge
• A second challenge
1. With a new control group / original group
2. Should be considered approximately one
week after the first one
3. Rechallenge may also be performed on the
original control group
Clinical observation
All skin reactions and any unusual findings,
including systematic reactions, result from
induction and challenge procedures should
be observed and recorded
Buehler test
• The bhehler test is an in vivo test to screen for
substance that cause human skin sensitisation
(i.e. Allergens)
• It was first proposed by Edwin Buehler in 1965
and further explained in 1980.
Number of animals :
• A minimum of 20 animals is used in the treatment group and at least 10
animals in the control group
Dose levels :
• The concentration for each induction exposure should be the highest to
cause (mild irritation)
• The concentration used for the challenge exposure should be the highe
st (non-irritating dose)
• The appropriate concentration can be determined from pilot study Using
two or three animals
Methode
Induction : Topical application
Day 0 – treated group
One flank is cleared of hair (closely clipped)
The test patch system should be fully loaded with test substance in a suitable
vehicle is applied to the test area and held in contact with the skin for 6 hours.
Day 0 - control group
One flank is cleared of hair (closely clipped)
The only vehicle applied on a similar manner of test application.
Days 6 – 8 and 13 – 15 treated and control group
The some application as on day 0 is carried out on the same test area of
same flank on day 6-8 and again on day 13-15.
Challenge
Day 27 – 29 treated and control groups
• The untreated flank of treated and control animals is cleared of hair.
• An occlusive patch or chamber containing the appropriate amount of
test substance is applied, at the maximum non irritant concentration, to
the posterior untreated flank of treated and control animals
• The patches or chambers are held in contact by a suitable dressing for
6 hours.
Observation – treated and control groups :
• Challenge area is cleared of hair 21 hours after removing the patch
• 3 hours later the skin reaction are observed and recorded
• Approximately 24 hours after the skin reaction observed and recorded
Rechallenge:
To clarify the results obtained in the first challenge
Clinical observations
• All skin reactions
• Any usual findings
1. Systemic reactions
• To clarify doubtful reactions
1. Histopathological examination
2. Measurement of skin fold thickness
Reference
OECD (1992) , Skin sensitisation. OECD Guideline for
the testing of Chemicals No. 406, Paris, France.
Thank you
Insert the title of your subtitle Here

skin sensitisation test

  • 1.
    http://www.free-powerpoint-templates-design.com Skin sensitisation (OECD.406) Prepared by: Momin Asran Zunnurain Khalid Ak Guided by: Dr. Aman B. Upganalwar M. PHARM FIRST YEAR (department of pharmacology) SNJB’s SSDJ College of Pharmacy, Chandwad
  • 2.
    Skin Sensitisation(OECD GUIDELINENO. 406) INTRODUCTION: • Skin sensitisation is defined as allergic response to a substance after skin contact. • Sensitisation is a immune system respose to chemical. • Symptoms of sensitisation are often seen in skin. • There are two type of animal use 1. Guinea Pig 2. Mouse
  • 3.
    Guinea Pig Two typeof test: 1. Freuds complete adjuvants (Guinea Pig Maximisation test) 2. Non adjuvants test (Buehler test) In the original guideline 406, Four adjuvants test and three non adjuvants test
  • 4.
    Mouse Immune system ofthe mouse has been investigated more extensive than that of the Guinea pig Advantages – short duration and minimal animal treatment Example: 1. Mouse ear swelling test 2. Local lymph node assay
  • 5.
    Guinea pig maximisationtest • The guinea pig maximisation test (GPMT) is an in vivo test to screen for substance that cause human skin sensitisation (i.e. Allergens) • It was first proposed by B. Magnussom and albert kligman in 1669 and described in their 1970 book contact dermatitis in the guinea pi
  • 6.
    General principle ofsensitisation test • The test animal are initially exposed to the test substance by intra dermal injection and epidermal application • Following a rest period of 10 to 14 days during which an immune response developed, the animal are exposed to a challange dose • The degree of skin reaction to the challange exposure in test animal is compared with control group animals
  • 7.
    Element common tosensitisation test in Guinea Pig 01 Guinea pig Animal 03 250-500g Body weight 05 Temperature=20℃ HR=30-70% 12hrs light & 12hrs dark Housing 02 Male Female (non pregnant) Sex 04 At least 5 days prior to the test Acclimatization 06 Feeding
  • 8.
    Method NUMBER OF ANIMAL Aminimum of 10 animal are used in the treatment group and at least 5 animals in the control group are used (20 test and 10 control) INDUCTION: INTRADERMAL INJECTION Day 0 – treated group 1. Three pair of intradermal injection are given in the shoulder region 1/1 mixture of FCA/water or saline 2. Test substance in an appropriate vehicle at the selected concentration 3. Test substance in a 1/1mixture of FCA/water or saline
  • 9.
    Day 0 –control group Control groupe also receive three intradermal injection, but only vehicle is used Day 5-7: Treated and control group 24 hrs before topical application, The test area after close clipping or saving painted with 0.5 ml of 10% sod lauryl sulphate In Vaseline, in order to creat a local irritation
  • 10.
    Day 6-8 :treated group Shaving Test substance applied to test area for 48 hrs Day 6-8 : control group Shaving Only vehicle are applied in similar manner for 48 hrs
  • 11.
    Day 20-22 :treated and control group A patches loaded with test substance is applied to flank of animal And A patches loaded with vehicle is applied to other side of flank For 24 hrs Observation : treated and control group Remove patch after 24 hrs Clean area after 21 hrs of patch removal Observe after 3 hrs (appropriate 48 hrs after challange) Approximately 24 hrs after this observation A second observation 72 hrs
  • 12.
    Scale for theevaluation of challenge patch test reaction 3=Intense erythema and swelling 2=Moderate erythema 1=Discrete or patchy erythema 0=No visible change
  • 13.
    Rechallenge • If itis necessary to clarify the results obtaine d in the first challenge • A second challenge 1. With a new control group / original group 2. Should be considered approximately one week after the first one 3. Rechallenge may also be performed on the original control group
  • 14.
    Clinical observation All skinreactions and any unusual findings, including systematic reactions, result from induction and challenge procedures should be observed and recorded
  • 15.
    Buehler test • Thebhehler test is an in vivo test to screen for substance that cause human skin sensitisation (i.e. Allergens) • It was first proposed by Edwin Buehler in 1965 and further explained in 1980.
  • 16.
    Number of animals: • A minimum of 20 animals is used in the treatment group and at least 10 animals in the control group Dose levels : • The concentration for each induction exposure should be the highest to cause (mild irritation) • The concentration used for the challenge exposure should be the highe st (non-irritating dose) • The appropriate concentration can be determined from pilot study Using two or three animals
  • 17.
    Methode Induction : Topicalapplication Day 0 – treated group One flank is cleared of hair (closely clipped) The test patch system should be fully loaded with test substance in a suitable vehicle is applied to the test area and held in contact with the skin for 6 hours. Day 0 - control group One flank is cleared of hair (closely clipped) The only vehicle applied on a similar manner of test application.
  • 18.
    Days 6 –8 and 13 – 15 treated and control group The some application as on day 0 is carried out on the same test area of same flank on day 6-8 and again on day 13-15. Challenge Day 27 – 29 treated and control groups • The untreated flank of treated and control animals is cleared of hair. • An occlusive patch or chamber containing the appropriate amount of test substance is applied, at the maximum non irritant concentration, to the posterior untreated flank of treated and control animals • The patches or chambers are held in contact by a suitable dressing for 6 hours.
  • 19.
    Observation – treatedand control groups : • Challenge area is cleared of hair 21 hours after removing the patch • 3 hours later the skin reaction are observed and recorded • Approximately 24 hours after the skin reaction observed and recorded Rechallenge: To clarify the results obtained in the first challenge
  • 20.
    Clinical observations • Allskin reactions • Any usual findings 1. Systemic reactions • To clarify doubtful reactions 1. Histopathological examination 2. Measurement of skin fold thickness
  • 21.
    Reference OECD (1992) ,Skin sensitisation. OECD Guideline for the testing of Chemicals No. 406, Paris, France.
  • 22.
    Thank you Insert thetitle of your subtitle Here