SERVICE RECOVERY
Service Recovery
 The Impact of Service Failure and Recovery
 How Customers Respond to Service Failures
 Service Recovery Strategies: Fixing the Customer
 Service Recovery Strategies: Fixing the Problem
 Service Guarantees
 Switching versus Staying Following Service Recovery
7-2
Objectives for Chapter 7:
Service Recovery
 Illustrate the importance of recovery from service failures in keeping
customers and building loyalty.
 Discuss the nature of consumer complaints and why people do and do
not complain.
 Provide evidence of what customers expect and the kind of responses
they want when they do complain.
 Present strategies for effective service recovery, including ways to “fix
the customer” after a service failure and to “fix the problem.”
 Discuss service guarantees—what they are, the benefits of guarantees,
and when to use them—as a particular type of service recovery
strategy.
7-3
Reliability is Critical in Service but…
 In all service contexts, service failure is inevitable.
 Service failure occurs when service performance that
falls below a customer’s expectations in such a way
that leads to customer dissatisfaction.
 Service recovery refers to the actions taken by a firm in
response to service failure.
7-4
Figure 7.1: Complaining Customers:
The Tip of the Iceberg
Source: Data from TARP Worldwide Inc., 2007
7-5
Unhappy Customers’ Repurchase Intentions
7-6
Exhibit 7.1: The Internet Spreads the Story
of Poor Service Recovery
7-7
The Service Recovery Paradox
Is a customer who has experienced a service
failure and exemplary service recovery more
likely to be more satisfied – impressed even –
with the service provider?
Should a firm “screw up” just a little so that it
can “fix the problem” superbly?
7-8
The Service Recovery Paradox
 “A good recovery can turn angry, frustrated customers
into loyal ones. ..can, in fact, create more goodwill than
if things had gone smoothly in the first place.” (Hart et
al. 1990)
 HOWEVER:
 Only a small percent of customers complain
 Service recovery must be SUPERLATIVE
 Only with responsiveness, redress, and empathy/courtesy
 Only with tangible rewards
 Even though service recovery can improve satisfaction, it has
not been found to increase purchase intentions or
perceptions of the brand
 Service recovery is expensive
7-9
The Service Recovery Paradox
 The service recovery paradox is more likely to occur
when:
 The failure is not considered by the customer to be severe
 The customer has not experienced prior failures with the firm
 The cause of the failure is viewed as unstable by The
customer
 The customer perceives that the company had little control
over the cause of the failure
 Conditions must be just right in order for the recovery
paradox to be present!
7-10
Customer Complaint Actions Following Service
Failure
7-11
Types of Complainers
 Passives: least likely to take any action, say anything to
the provider, spread negative WOM, or complain to a
third party; doubtful of the effectiveness of
complaining
 Voicers: actively complain to the provider, but not
likely to spread negative WOM; believe in the positive
consequences of complaining - the service provider’s
best friends!
7-12
Types of Complainers
 Irates: more likely to engage in negative WOM to
friends and relatives and to switch providers; average
in complaints to provider; unlikely to complain to third
parties; more angry, less likely to give provider a
second chance
 Activists: above average propensity to complain on all
levels; more likely to complain to a third party; feel
most alienated from the marketplace compared to
other groups; in extreme cases can become “terrorists”
7-13
Service Recovery Strategies
7-14
Fixing the Customer
When customers take the time to complain,
they generally have high expectations.
 They expect the company to respond quickly and to
be accountable.
 They expect to be compensated for their grief and
for the hassle of being inconvenienced.
 They expect to be treated nicely in the process!
7-15
Respond Quickly
7-16
Provide Appropriate Communication
7-17
Treat Customers Fairly
 Outcome fairness
 Outcome (compensation) should match the customer’s level of
dissatisfaction; equality with what other customers receive; choices
 Procedural fairness
 Fairness in terms of policies, rules, timeliness of the complaint
process; clarity, speed, no hassles; also choices: “What can we do to
compensate you…?”
 Interactional fairness
 Politeness, care, and honesty on the part of the company and its
employees; rude behavior on the part of employees may be due to
lack of training and empowerment
7-18
Fixing the Problem
 After “fixing the customer” the company should
address the actual problem that created the poor
service delivery in the first place.
 If the problem is likely to recur for other customers,
then the service delivery process may need to be fixed,
too.
 Strategies for fixing the problem include encouraging
and tracking complaints, learning from recovery
experiences and from lost customers, and making the
service fail-safe.
7-19
Service Guarantees
 Guarantee = an assurance of the fulfillment of a condition
(Webster’s Dictionary)
 In a business context, a guarantee is a pledge or assurance that a
product offered by a firm will perform as promised and, if not,
then some form of reparation will be undertaken by the firm
 For tangible products, a guarantee is often done in the form of a
warranty
 Services are often not guaranteed
 Cannot return the service
 Service experience is intangible (so what do you guarantee?)
7-20
Characteristics of an Effective
Service Guarantee
 Unconditional
 The guarantee should make its promise unconditionally – no strings
attached
 Meaningful
 The firm should guarantee elements of the service that are important to
the customer
 The payout should cover fully the customer’s dissatisfaction
 Easy to Understand
 Customers need to understand what to expect
 Employees need to understand what to do
 Easy to Invoke
 The firm should eliminate hoops or red tape in the way of accessing or
collecting on the guarantee
7-21
Benefits of Service Guarantees
 A good guarantee forces the company to focus on its customers.
 An effective guarantee sets clear standards for the organization.
 A good guarantee generates immediate and relevant feedback
from customers.
 When the guarantee is invoked there is an instant opportunity
to recover.
 Information generated through the guarantee can be tracked
and integrated into continuous improvement efforts.
 A service guarantee reduces customers’ sense of risk and builds
confidence in the organization.
7-22
When to Use (or Not Use) a Guarantee
Reasons companies might NOT want to offer a
service guarantee:
 Existing service quality is poor
 A guarantee does not fit the company’s image
 Service quality is truly uncontrollable
 Potential exists for customer abuse of the guarantee
 Costs of the guarantee outweigh the benefits
 Customers perceive little risk in the service
7-23
Causes Behind Service Switching
7-24

Service Recovery.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Service Recovery  TheImpact of Service Failure and Recovery  How Customers Respond to Service Failures  Service Recovery Strategies: Fixing the Customer  Service Recovery Strategies: Fixing the Problem  Service Guarantees  Switching versus Staying Following Service Recovery 7-2
  • 3.
    Objectives for Chapter7: Service Recovery  Illustrate the importance of recovery from service failures in keeping customers and building loyalty.  Discuss the nature of consumer complaints and why people do and do not complain.  Provide evidence of what customers expect and the kind of responses they want when they do complain.  Present strategies for effective service recovery, including ways to “fix the customer” after a service failure and to “fix the problem.”  Discuss service guarantees—what they are, the benefits of guarantees, and when to use them—as a particular type of service recovery strategy. 7-3
  • 4.
    Reliability is Criticalin Service but…  In all service contexts, service failure is inevitable.  Service failure occurs when service performance that falls below a customer’s expectations in such a way that leads to customer dissatisfaction.  Service recovery refers to the actions taken by a firm in response to service failure. 7-4
  • 5.
    Figure 7.1: ComplainingCustomers: The Tip of the Iceberg Source: Data from TARP Worldwide Inc., 2007 7-5
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Exhibit 7.1: TheInternet Spreads the Story of Poor Service Recovery 7-7
  • 8.
    The Service RecoveryParadox Is a customer who has experienced a service failure and exemplary service recovery more likely to be more satisfied – impressed even – with the service provider? Should a firm “screw up” just a little so that it can “fix the problem” superbly? 7-8
  • 9.
    The Service RecoveryParadox  “A good recovery can turn angry, frustrated customers into loyal ones. ..can, in fact, create more goodwill than if things had gone smoothly in the first place.” (Hart et al. 1990)  HOWEVER:  Only a small percent of customers complain  Service recovery must be SUPERLATIVE  Only with responsiveness, redress, and empathy/courtesy  Only with tangible rewards  Even though service recovery can improve satisfaction, it has not been found to increase purchase intentions or perceptions of the brand  Service recovery is expensive 7-9
  • 10.
    The Service RecoveryParadox  The service recovery paradox is more likely to occur when:  The failure is not considered by the customer to be severe  The customer has not experienced prior failures with the firm  The cause of the failure is viewed as unstable by The customer  The customer perceives that the company had little control over the cause of the failure  Conditions must be just right in order for the recovery paradox to be present! 7-10
  • 11.
    Customer Complaint ActionsFollowing Service Failure 7-11
  • 12.
    Types of Complainers Passives: least likely to take any action, say anything to the provider, spread negative WOM, or complain to a third party; doubtful of the effectiveness of complaining  Voicers: actively complain to the provider, but not likely to spread negative WOM; believe in the positive consequences of complaining - the service provider’s best friends! 7-12
  • 13.
    Types of Complainers Irates: more likely to engage in negative WOM to friends and relatives and to switch providers; average in complaints to provider; unlikely to complain to third parties; more angry, less likely to give provider a second chance  Activists: above average propensity to complain on all levels; more likely to complain to a third party; feel most alienated from the marketplace compared to other groups; in extreme cases can become “terrorists” 7-13
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Fixing the Customer Whencustomers take the time to complain, they generally have high expectations.  They expect the company to respond quickly and to be accountable.  They expect to be compensated for their grief and for the hassle of being inconvenienced.  They expect to be treated nicely in the process! 7-15
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Treat Customers Fairly Outcome fairness  Outcome (compensation) should match the customer’s level of dissatisfaction; equality with what other customers receive; choices  Procedural fairness  Fairness in terms of policies, rules, timeliness of the complaint process; clarity, speed, no hassles; also choices: “What can we do to compensate you…?”  Interactional fairness  Politeness, care, and honesty on the part of the company and its employees; rude behavior on the part of employees may be due to lack of training and empowerment 7-18
  • 19.
    Fixing the Problem After “fixing the customer” the company should address the actual problem that created the poor service delivery in the first place.  If the problem is likely to recur for other customers, then the service delivery process may need to be fixed, too.  Strategies for fixing the problem include encouraging and tracking complaints, learning from recovery experiences and from lost customers, and making the service fail-safe. 7-19
  • 20.
    Service Guarantees  Guarantee= an assurance of the fulfillment of a condition (Webster’s Dictionary)  In a business context, a guarantee is a pledge or assurance that a product offered by a firm will perform as promised and, if not, then some form of reparation will be undertaken by the firm  For tangible products, a guarantee is often done in the form of a warranty  Services are often not guaranteed  Cannot return the service  Service experience is intangible (so what do you guarantee?) 7-20
  • 21.
    Characteristics of anEffective Service Guarantee  Unconditional  The guarantee should make its promise unconditionally – no strings attached  Meaningful  The firm should guarantee elements of the service that are important to the customer  The payout should cover fully the customer’s dissatisfaction  Easy to Understand  Customers need to understand what to expect  Employees need to understand what to do  Easy to Invoke  The firm should eliminate hoops or red tape in the way of accessing or collecting on the guarantee 7-21
  • 22.
    Benefits of ServiceGuarantees  A good guarantee forces the company to focus on its customers.  An effective guarantee sets clear standards for the organization.  A good guarantee generates immediate and relevant feedback from customers.  When the guarantee is invoked there is an instant opportunity to recover.  Information generated through the guarantee can be tracked and integrated into continuous improvement efforts.  A service guarantee reduces customers’ sense of risk and builds confidence in the organization. 7-22
  • 23.
    When to Use(or Not Use) a Guarantee Reasons companies might NOT want to offer a service guarantee:  Existing service quality is poor  A guarantee does not fit the company’s image  Service quality is truly uncontrollable  Potential exists for customer abuse of the guarantee  Costs of the guarantee outweigh the benefits  Customers perceive little risk in the service 7-23
  • 24.
    Causes Behind ServiceSwitching 7-24