The document provides information on writing reaction papers, reviews, and critiques by defining each type of writing and explaining their purposes, typical lengths, and focuses. It distinguishes reaction papers as personal responses to texts, reviews as assessments of works, and critiques as evaluations of works within their fields. The document offers examples of potential topics for each type of writing and outlines their common elements and structures to help writers effectively communicate their thoughts.

1. Reaction Paper
Review
Critique
Cendz Flores

2. Objectives
• Understand the differences between a reaction paper, review,
and critique and how to effectively write each type.
• Analyze the purpose and audience of a reaction paper, review,
and critique and tailor writing accordingly.
• Practice incorporating constructive criticism in a review and
critique to improve the text being analyzed.
• Develop critical thinking skills by identifying strengths and
weaknesses in a text and formulating a thoughtful response in a
reaction paper, review, and critique.

3. Reaction Paper/Review/Critique
A reaction paper is
a short essay that
presents a writer's
response or
reaction to one or
more texts
A review is a
critical
assessment or
evaluation of a
work of art,
literature, film, or
performance.
A critique is a detailed
analysis and evaluation of
a scholarly work or design.
It can include a review of
the work's strengths and
weaknesses, but also
focuses on its theoretical,
methodological, or
practical implications.

4. Reaction
Paper
It is often used as a tool in a classroom setting to
encourage students to think critically about texts and
how they are in conversation with each other or a wider
field of discourse. The paper is typically 2-5 pages long
and requires the writer to analyze the text, interpret its
meaning, and evaluate its impact. The writer is
expected to demonstrate their critical thinking and
writing skills, and to support their arguments with
evidence from the text.

5. Review
It usually ranges in length from 250-
750 words and requires the writer to
provide an overview of the work,
analyze its strengths and
weaknesses, and offer
recommendations for improvement.
The review should be objective and
unbiased, and the writer should use
evidence to support their opinions

6. A critique is usually longer
than a review and requires
the writer to demonstrate
an in-depth understanding
of the work, its context, and
its contribution to the field.
The writer should also
provide recommendations
for further research or
development.
Critique Paper

7. TYPE PURPOSE LENGTH FOCUS
Reaction Paper
To present a writer's response
or reaction to one or more
texts.
2-5 pages
Analyzing the text,
interpreting its meaning, and
evaluating its impact.
Review
To provide a critical
assessment or evaluation of a
work of art, literature, film, or
performance.
250-750 words
Analyzing the work's strengths
and weaknesses and offering
recommendations for
improvement.
Critique Paper
To provide a detailed analysis
and evaluation of a scholarly
work or design.
Longer than a review
Reviewing the work's
theoretical, methodological,
or practical implications and
providing recommendations
for further research or
development.
Comparison

8. While these types of writing share some common
elements, they differ in their focus and purpose. A
reaction paper is a personal response to a text, a
review is an assessment of a work, and a critique is
an evaluation of a work within its field.
Understanding the key elements and structures of
each can help writers effectively communicate their
thoughts and opinions on a text or work.

9. Reaction Paper
• Introduction: The introduction of a reaction paper should
provide context for the text being responded to and a clear
thesis statement that previews the main points of the
paper.
• Summary: The summary section should briefly summarize
the key points of the text.
• Conclusion: The conclusion should summarize the main
points of the paper and offer final thoughts or
recommendations.
• Analysis: The analysis section should provide the writer's
critical response to the text, including reactions, opinions,
and connections to other texts or wider issues.

10. Here are some potential topics that
could inspire a reaction paper:
• An academic article or book that you read for a class
• A news article or editorial about a current event
• A TED talk or other educational video
• A poem or short story
• A piece of artwork or photography
• A music video or song lyrics

11. Review
Introduction: The introduction should provide
context for the work being reviewed and a clear
thesis statement that previews the main point.
Summary: The summary section should provide a
brief overview of the work being reviewed.nts of
the review.

12. Here are some potential topics for a
review paper:
• A movie or TV show that you recently watched
• A restaurant that you visited and tried the food
• A book that you read and enjoyed (or didn't enjoy)
• A new piece of technology or gadget that you purchased
• A video game that you played

13. Review
Evaluation: The evaluation section should
provide an assessment of the work, including
strengths and weaknesses, and should
support the assessment with evidence from
the work.
Conclusion: The conclusion should
summarize the main points of the review and
offer final thoughts or recommendations.

14. Here are some potential topics for
a critique paper:
• A scientific study or research paper
• A political speech or debate
• A work of literature or film that you have studied in depth
• An advertisement or marketing campaign
• A piece of music or art that you have a strong opinion about

15. Introduction: The introduction should provide context
for the work being critiqued and a clear thesis
statement that previews the main points of the critique.
Summary: The summary section should provide
a brief overview of the work being critiqued.
Analysis: The analysis section should provide an
assessment of the work, including strengths and
weaknesses, and should support the assessment with
evidence from the work.
Evaluation: The evaluation section should evaluate the
effectiveness or relevance of the work within its field,
and should support the evaluation with evidence from
the field.
Critique
Paper
Conclusion: The conclusion should summarize the main
points of the critique and offer final thoughts or
recommendations

16. "The Muddy Road"
Tanzan and Ekido were traveling down a muddy road during the heavy
rain when they came across a lovely girl in a silk kimono and sash. The girl
was unable to cross the intersection due to the muddy road. Tanzan,
without hesitation, lifted the girl in his arms and carried her over the mud.
Then, the two monks continued on their way.
As they walked, Ekido grew increasingly agitated, finally blurting out, "Why
did you carry that girl? We monks are not supposed to do things like that."
Tanzan replied, "I left the girl there. Are you still carrying her?"

17. Writing the Reaction Paper
To write a reaction paper on "The Muddy Road," a student could consider the following elements:
Summary: Begin by summarizing the story of "The Muddy Road" and the encounter between
Tanzan, Ekido, and the girl in the silk kimono.
Reflection: Reflect on the themes and messages presented in the story. For example, the concept
of non-judgment and compassion is central to the story.
Personal response: Share your personal thoughts and feelings about the story. For example, how
did the story make you feel? Did it resonate with you in any way?
Application: Consider how the story could be applied to your life or the world around you. What
lessons can be learned from the story?

18. THANK YOU!