SlideShare a Scribd company logo
111-1
M I D A S I T
Bridging YourInnovations to Realities
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
2
Rail Structure Interaction
Overview
1) Definition of Continuous Welded Rail (CWR)
Rails are continuously welded and thus, the length of one rail is longer than 200m.
ex > standard length rail (L=25m), longer rail (L=25~200m)
2) Necessity of Continuous Welded Rail
Time[ms]
Dynamicamplification
Q
Q
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
16 18 20 221412108642
Wheel/rail impact forces
Wheel impact
forces occur
- The reduced impact force in the rails increases the life span of the rails and improves the ride quality.
- The decreasing noise and vibration by the reduced impact force is less impeding the ambient environment.
3) Check Points for Continuous Welded Rail
- When temperature rises: track deformation
(buckling of rail)
- When temperature drops: fracture failure
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
3
Rail Structure Interaction
Traction/Braking loads
abutment pier
Longitudinal displacements
at top surface of deck end
Temperature Train vertical loads
Track-BridgeInteraction
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
4
Rail Structure Interaction
Track-BridgeInteraction
1) Axial Forcesin a ContinuouslyWeldedRail Track on Embankment
(Thermal Load on the Rail)
2) Axial Forcesin a ContinuouslyWeldedRail Track on Bridge
(Thermal Load on the Bridge)
Axial forces in the track on embankment
under thermal loading
Track/bridge interaction due to
thermal loading
Fixed end Movable end
Continuous welded rail
Additional rail
stresses
Axial forces
in the rails
Distance (m)
Displacementintherails(mm)
Resistance
TAEF ∆×××= α
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
5
Rail Structure Interaction
Design Requirementsfor Track/Bridge Interaction Analysis
Design Standards: UIC774-3, EN 1991-2
Item Loads
DesignCriteria
Gravel ballast bed Concrete bed
Additional rail
stress
Compressive stress Thermal loads
Traction/braking loads
Train vertical loads
R≥1500: 72N/mm2
R≥700: 58N/mm2
R≥600: 54N/mm2
R≥300: 27N/mm2
92N/mm2
Tensile stress 92N/mm2 92N/mm2
Longitudinal relative displacement in
bridge deck
Traction/braking loads
<5mm
<30mm (when rail
expansion device at both
ends)
Check the stability (the
uplift force and
compression) of rail
fastener
longitudinal displacement due to rotation
of the deck end between deck and deck or
between deck and pier
Train vertical loads <8mm
Check the stability (the
uplift force and
compression) of rail
fastener
Opening displacement when split web at
rail end takes place (applying cable
signaling system or zero-longitudinal
resistance rail (ZLR) fastener)
Thermal loads D=√(R2-(R-δ)2)
Same as the gravel track
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
6
Rail Structure Interaction
Design Loads
- If all of the spans in the bridge consist of a continuous welded rail, thermal loads are applied to the bridge and rails or the
rails only.
- If rail expansion joints are present on the bridge, thermal loads are applied to both the bridge and the rails.
- Temperature variations in the rails and bridge are as follows:
. Rails: in summer=+40℃, in winter=-50℃
. Bridge: concrete structures=±25℃, steel structures= normal temperature area ±35℃, cold temperature area ± 45℃
1) Thermal Loads
2) Traction/Braking Loads
- Traction/braking loads are uniformly distributed and applied to the two front positions of the rails. The magnitude
of load and the loaded length are as follows:
- For the cases such as an exclusive subway track, light rail transit, etc where the design loads are different,
transformed uniform loads which correspond to ¼ of the rail axial loads are used. The loaded length is equal to
one maximum coach.
- Traction/braking loads are applied concurrently with the associated vertical loads.
- Traction/braking loads are applied to the positions that will cause the most unfavorable rail stresses or bridge
deformations.
Type of Track
Tractionloads braking loads
Magnitude of Load Loadedlength Magnitude of Load Loadedlength
High-speedrailway 33kN/m/track 33m 20kN/m/track 400m
Normal railway 24kN/m/track 33m 12kN/m/track 300m
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
7
Rail Structure Interaction
Design Loads
-For a high-speed railway, HL load does not include
an impact factor. For a passenger locomotive, HL
load can have a uniform load of 60kN/m.
- For a normal railway, LS load and an equivalent load
can be applied and an impact factor is not
considered.
- For an exclusive subway track, EL-18 load or an equivalent
uniformly distributed load can be applied.
- For a double or more track bridge, only two tracks will be
loaded with train vertical loads.
- For a multi-span continuous bridge, only the deck near the
critical positions will be loaded.
3) Train Vertical Loads
(b) Equivalent HL load
(a) HL load
(b) Equivalent LS load
(a) LS load (L-load)
95kN/m
74kN/m
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
8
Rail Structure Interaction
Load Combinations
- Load combinations used for computing the rail stresses and the longitudinal loads acting on bearings
- When computing the stresses and displacements in the rails for a continuous or simply supported bridge deck:
α,β,γ=1
- When using the computational analysis method, the interaction due to traction/braking loads and train vertical
loads can be separately computed.
ƩR = αR (Thermal loads) + βR(Traction/braking loads)+γR(Train vertical loads)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
9
Rail Structure Interaction
1) Establishment of Criteria for Construction of Rail Expansion Joint on BridgeSection
RailExpansion Joint
Countermeasure
The limits to the axial force and displacement
of a continuous welded rail on bridge are exceeded
bridge
track
Support layout
Span composition
Stiffness of deck
Use zero-longitudinal resistance
rail fasteners
Economicefficiency
Compare the maintenance cost forrail
expansion joints with the cost of bridge
construction
Conditions for building rail expansion joints
 Minimum separated distance between expansion joints
 Separation distance from a turnout
 Separation distance from the terminus for a transition
curve
 Separation distance from the terminus for a bell curve
 Requirements for building the bridge deck
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
10
Rail Structure Interaction
2) Flowchart
RailExpansion Joint
Check the axial force
and displacement in
the rails
Modify the support placement
Check the axial force
and displacement in
the rails
Modify the span composition
Check the axial force
and displacement in
the rails
Modify the stiffness of deck
Check the axial force
and displacement in
the rails
Use a zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener
Check the axial force
and displacement in
the rails
Consider building REJ (rail expansion joint)
Analyze the economical
efficiency
Submit the report
Allow the constructionof rail
expansion joint
ContinueOK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
NG
NG
NG
NG
NG
NG
NG
NG
NG
NG
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
11
Rail Structure Interaction
1) Computational Analysis
- Considerations for modeling
• Placement of bearings, the dimensions and properties of the deck and pier, the bending stiffness and the height of deck,
the neutral axis of deck, and the lateral and bending stiffness of foundation.
- Finite elements
• Rail and bridge: Beam elements
• Ballast or pad: nonlinear spring elements
- Modeling method
• Element length: 1~2m is recommended
상판중립축
궤도중심선
Rigid Link
Rigid Link
Track-BridgeInteraction Analysis
Embankment section
Bridge deck
Springfor the longitudinal
resistance of ballast (Bilinear)
Rail
Rail expansion joint
Neutral axis of bridge deck
Centerline of track
Bearing
Longitudinal displacement of the rail
1. Observed data
2. Idealized bilinear curve (under train loading)
3. Bilinear curve when train loading is not applied
Longitudinal
resistance of
the roadbed
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
12
Rail Structure Interaction
- The accuracy depends on the computational analysis methods.
- The following two computational analysis methods are available:
. Separate analysis: thermal loading, traction/braking loading and train vertical
loading are separately considered.
. Complete Analysis: thermal loading, traction/braking loading and train vertical
loading are concurrently applied.
- Depending on the global structural system, the separate analysis is more likely to
producethe greater axial forcesthan the staged analysis.
AnalysisMethods
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
13
Rail Structure Interaction
Simplified Separate Analysis Complete Analysis
AnalysisMethods
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
14
Rail Structure Interaction
RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Layout)
Advanced:define the fixedendsfreelyand
adjustthe spanlength
ZLR: Specifythe zero-longitudinalresistance rail
fastener(the resistance of ballastissetto zerofor
the specifiedsections.)
REJ: Place the rail expansionjointforeachtrack
ex ) 4@50,70:four decks with the length of 50m and
a deck with the length of 70m. The total length of
bridge section is 270m.
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
15
Rail Structure Interaction
TaperedSectionAssignment
Sectionsat 0.1 of the total span length:Span_2
Sectionsat 0.5 of the total span length:Span
Sectionsat 0.9 of the total span length:Span_2
TaperedOption
Start 0.1~Start 0.5: Z Axis CurvedType (Quadratic) , From (J-end)
Start 0.5~Start 0.9: Z Axis CurvedType (Quadratic) , From (I-end)
Define TaperedSection
RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Section)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
16
Rail Structure Interaction
1 . Lateral Resistance Data
- Enter gravel ballast data and concrete ballast data.
- For gravel ballast,the resistance of ballast isdifferentbetweenthe stress
checkand the displacementcheck.
2. Define Condition
- Selecteithergravel ballastor concrete ballast for the entire section.
- Via the ‘Advanced’function,selecteithergravel ballast or concrete ballastby
sections(Forundefinedsections,gravel ballastisused).
3. Boundary Types
Spring Type Bearing Type
1
23
RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Boundaries)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
17
Rail Structure Interaction
4. ModelingbySections
1) Embankment section
5. Boundary ConditionsTaking into Account the Effective Length
The resistance ofballast enteredshouldbe in kN/m and islongitudinal resistance.
The resistance multipliedbythe effective lengthwill be usedin the model.
2) Section connecting embankment and deck start point 3) Section connecting deck start and end points
RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Boundaries)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
18
Rail Structure Interaction
1. Accelerating/braking/vertical train loadscan be freelyenteredbysectionsin a tabular format.
The length and magnitude of load can be enteredwithreference tothe leftendof the model.
-RunningDirection:the direction in which the train runs.Define either‘KeepRight’or ‘KeepLeft’.
-TrainSection: Train sectionis recognizedwhenavertical load is entered. Whenavertical Load is excluded,define TrainSectionandapply Loaded
Condition.
- Load Type:For single track, in general,applyeitheraccelerating loadsor brakingloads. Fordouble track, apply acceleratingloads andbraking loads
foreachtrack. Asfar as train vertical loads are concerned, variousuniformloadscan be appliedby sectionsandtherefore HLload, which is most
frequentlyused,canbe easilyrepresented.
2. Filesare added for the moving load analysis
- Number ofTrack LoadingLocations: the numberof movingtimesof train load.If “n” is entered,nfilesare added.
- Location Incrementfor eachModel:the incrementof moving load pertrack. If “n” is entered,the trainmovesbyn and the boundaryconditions
are assignedtothe sectionto which the train load is applied.
ex> If “Number of Track Loading Locations” is 3 and “Location Increment for Track” is 10, the train moves forward by 10m, 20m and 30m and three files are added.
Case 1: Single Track Case 2: Double Track
RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Load)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
19
Rail Structure Interaction
RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard
1 .StressCheck Model Option
Thisoptioncreatesa file to checkthe additionalstresses.
-SimplifiedSeparate AnalysisModel
-Complete Analysis
2. DisplacementCheckModel Option
Thisoptioncreatesa file to checkthe displacements. Inthisfile,the resistance of ballast applied at UnloadedConditionisdifferentforthe case of
gravelballast.In addition, this file is available only for SimplifiedSeparate AnalysisModel.
- Relative LongitudinalDisplacementComponentdue toAccelerationandBrakingAlone
- Relative LongitudinalDisplacementComponentdue toVerticalEffects
-Relative LongitudinalDisplacementComponentatRailExpansionJoints
- Rail Break GapSize
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
20
Rail Structure Interaction
CaseStudies
Forthe case of a high-speedrailwaywithgravel ballast and double track,the following propertiesare definedforrail, ballast and horizontal
alignment:
Track Item Property Unit Value Remark
Rail
UIC60
Cross-sectionalarea A m2 7.669E-3
Moment of inertia Iyy m4 30.363E-6
Ballast
Gravelballast
Longitudinal resistance (Unloaded) kN/m 12.0~20.0 Stress check: 20.0
Displacement check: 12.0
Longitudinal resistance (Loaded) kN/m 60.0
Limit displacement mm 2.0
Horizontal
alignment
Tangent section
Girder Type
Span Length
Equivalent Modulus
of Elasticity
Cross-
sectional Area
Moment of Inertia
Neutral Axis
(Girder Reference
Location)
Main Girder Height
( m ) ( E : N/m2 ) ( A : m2 ) ( Iyy : m4 ) ( Izz : m4 ) ( d : m ) ( H : m )
PC Box 40 2.8 x 1010 12.0 20.0 165.0 1.11 3.5
PCBox girder bridge is chosenfor the high-speedrailwaytrack.
The dimensionsof girderandthe geometricrelationbetweenthe girderandtrack are definedasfollows:
The longitudinalresistance of deckis setto 1.5 x 10
6
kN/m.
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
21
Rail Structure Interaction
Forthe case of a high-speedrailwaywithgravel ballast and double track,the rail, ballast and horizontal alignmentare definedasfollows:
Simple bridge type
Continuousbridge type
CaseStudies
40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m
80m 80m 80m 80m 80m
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
22
Rail Structure Interaction
Axial stressby temperature load (Simple spanbridge)
Axial stressby temperature load (Continuousbridge)
Because the simple bridge type gives the smaller additional stress than the continuous bridge type, the simple bridge type is adopted.
CaseStudies
-26.6 MPa
-44.1MPa
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
23
Rail Structure Interaction
CaseStudies
Axial stressby temperature (+25°C) at UnloadedCondition
Axial stressby temperature,traction and vertical train loads at LoadedCondition
-35.6MPa
-26.6 MPa
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
24
Rail Structure Interaction
CaseStudies
Axial stressby temperature,braking and vertical train loadswith differenttrain position
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
25
Rail Structure Interaction
CheckDisplacements
- Restrict the deformations of the deck and the track to prevent the excessive relaxation of ballast.
- Limits to the relative lateral displacements between the bridge deck and rails under traction/braking loads: 4mm or less
- Exceptions are made for the cases where the zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener is used and the special treatment is
done for the contact underneath the rails.
2) Limits to the RelativeLongitudinal Displacements in the Bridge Deck
3) Limits to the Longitudinal Displacements in the Deck End due to the Angle of Rotation
- Limits to the longitudinal displacements in the deck end due to the rotation of the deck end under train vertical
loads: 8mm or less
1) RelativeDisplacements between the Rails and Bridge
- Limits to the absolute longitudinal displacements between the bridge deck and pier or between the bridge deck
and deck under traction/braking loads: 5mm or less
Limits to relative longitudinal displacements Limits to displacements due to rotation of deck end
abutment pier
Longitudinal displacements
at top surface of deck end
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
26
Rail Structure Interaction
Japanese Shinkansen Railway Structure Design Standard
Conditions
Allowable opening
displacements
-rail: 60kg
-buckling strength of rail:
100tonf/rail
69mm
ACI Manual of Concrete Practice
Wheel radius
Allowable opening
displacements
16 in. (0.4m) or less 2in.(50mm)
16 in. or higher 4in.(100mm)
CheckDisplacements
4) AllowableOpening Displacements when Opening Gap at Rail End takes place .
- Allowable Opening Displacements According to International Standards
- Allowable Opening Displacements According to Korean Standards
. Railway Design Manual (Volume Track)
1) Limits to the opening displacements, d, when the split web at rail
end takes place due to thermal loads in case of using cable
signaling system (not track circuit system):
2 2
( )d R R δ= − − 3
2
xP
e x
EI
β
δ β
β
−
= 4
4
k
EI
β =
2) Restrict the opening displacements of (1) when a
zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener is built
Wheel loadP
Center of wheel O
Vehicle velocity V
Wheel radius R
Vertical displacement δBending stiffness of rail EI
Bearing stiffness of trackK
Opening displacement d
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
27
Rail Structure Interaction
Relative Longitudinal Displacementbytraction loads
CaseStudies
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
28
Rail Structure Interaction
CaseStudies
Tip> If the deck is defined by Center-Top, the nodal displacements at deck top are produced and
these include the nodal displacements due to rotational angle. If the deck is defined by centroid,
the nodal displacements at deck top can be computed using the following equation:
Relative displacement due to rotation of the end
= displacement Dx at neutral axis + distance from centroid to deck top x sin(Rot Ry)
Relative Longitudinal Displacementbyvertical train loads
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
29
Rail Structure Interaction
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Track (1)
1) Longitudinal Resistanceof Track
Longitudinal resistance of trackvs. longitudinal
displacement of rail
Bi-Linear behavior of longitudinal resistance of track
Allowable longitudinal resistance of track
 Note 1: Apply 20.0kN/m when checking the rail stresses and apply 12.0kN/m when checking the displacements in the structure
 Note 2: In the case when tests for longitudinal resistance are conducted, values derived from tests can be used.
Type of Track Load Case
Limit displacement
(mm)
Longitudinal
resistance of track
(kN/m)
Remark
Gravel track
Loaded Case 2.0 12.0~20.0 Note 1
Unloaded Case 2.0 60.0
Concrete track or frozen
ballast track
Loaded Case 0.5 40.0 Note 2
Unloaded Case 0.5 60.0
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
30
Rail Structure Interaction
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Track (1)
Axial stresses of Ballast Bed in the longitudinal direction
Axial stresses of Concrete Bed in the longitudinal direction
Unloaded Condition (underthermal loads)
Loaded Condition
(traction/brakingloads and vertical loads added)
Unloaded Condition (underthermal loads)
Loaded Condition
(traction/brakingloads and vertical loads added)
Longitudinal axial stress is about 30% less in the ballast track than in the concrete track under the same conditions.
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
31
Rail Structure Interaction
2) Zero-Longitudinal Resistance Rail (ZLR) Fastener inthe BridgeSection
Characteristic behavior of zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener
- The zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener behaves similarly to the conventional rail fastener for the gravity
load but generates a gap between the rail and the rail fastener not to introduce longitudinal resistance.
<Gap between rail fastener and rail base> <Downslide of rigid body of rail fastener> <Vertical load-displacement diagram>
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Track (2)
Installing ZLR fastener can reduce about 29% of the axial stress.
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
32
Rail Structure Interaction
1) Expansion Length
- Maximum expansion length recommended by UIC774-3 for a single deck railway bridge with gravel ballast not needing
REJ (rail expansion joint)
. 60m: Steel structure with gravel ballast track (the maximum length is 120m when a support exists in the middle)
. 90m: Steel or concrete bridge with gravel ballast track and concrete slab
(the maximum length is 180m when a support exists in the middle)
. For the ballastless track, detailed analysis should be conducted.
- Illustrations of expansion lengths
L 2L
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (1)
- Type 1 - Type 2
- Type 3 - Type 4
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
33
Rail Structure Interaction
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (1)
- Type 1
-Unloaded Condition : 26.48 MPa -Loaded Condition : 32.86 MPa
-Unloaded Condition : 11.45 MPa -Loaded Condition : 14.07 MPa
- Type 2
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
34
Rail Structure Interaction
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (1)
- Type 3
-Unloaded Condition : 26.52 MPa -Loaded Condition : 42.05 MPa
-Unloaded Condition : 21.12 MPa -Loaded Condition : 26.43 MPa
- Type 4
Axial stresses in the longitudinal direction under the same conditions:
Type 2 (14.07 MPa) < Type 4 (26.43 MPa) < Type 1 (32.86 MPa) < Type 3 (42.05 Mpa)
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
35
Rail Structure Interaction
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (2)
2) Span length
3) Bending stiffness of the deck and the deck height
- Train vertical loads can cause the longitudinal deformations in the girder, and the span length is the factor
causing the track/bridge interaction.
- Because of the bending of deck, train vertical loads on bridge can cause interactions.
- The bending of deck induces longitudinal deflections at top surface of the deck end and therefore causes the
relaxation of gravel track.
-The effect of bending in deck end
1.0 EI 1.5 EI 2.0 EI
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
0.1 Ko
0.5 Ko
1.0 Ko
2.0 Ko
10 Ko
RailStress(MPa)
2@40M_FMM_Vertical Load
Stiffness of Deck
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
36
Rail Structure Interaction
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (3)
4) Support stiffness
K: Total stiffness of support
: relative displacement between the upperand lower parts of bearing
-Factors affecting the support stiffness K
Bending ofPier Rotation ofFoundation Displacement of Foundation
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
37
Rail Structure Interaction
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (4)
5) Effects of support layout of bridge
Axial forces by FF-MM type Axial forces by FM type
-Types of bearing
FFFF type
FM type
FMMF type
FMM type
MFM type
MFMM type
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
38
Rail Structure Interaction
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (4)
Cases illustratingthe effects ofsupport layout ofbridge
- Case1: Simple bridge ( 1@30 8 Span)
Axial force is about 26% less for MFFM type (28.12 MPa) than in the FMFM type (38.08 MPa) when other conditions are identical.
- Case 2: 2 span continuous bridge (2@30 4 Span)
Axial force is about 45% less for MFM type (29.77 MPa) than in the FMM type (54.20 MPa) when other conditions are identical.
FMFM type MFFM type
MFM type FMM type
38.1 MPa 28.1 MPa
29.8 MPa 54.2 MPa
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
39
Rail Structure Interaction
FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (4)
6) Axial forces affected by span composition
Case 1 : 78.75 MPa > Case 2 : 60.63 MPa > Case 3 : 59.72 MPa
Axial force is 24.2% less for Case 3 than in Case 1.
78.7 MPa 60.6MPa
59.7 MPa
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
40
Rail Structure Interaction
1) Verificationof computational analysis
- A computer program that performs the track/bridge interaction should be validated against the test cases specified in the
Appendix 1.7.1 of UIC774-3. Percentage errors may be up to 10% and up to 20% for safety side.
Standard dimensions recommended by UIC774-3
Result table for a simple span bridge specified in UIC774-3
Track-BridgeInteraction Verification
Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil
41
Rail Structure Interaction
2) Validation against UIC774-3
Resultdue to temperature 35 degreescentigrade onbridge deck:
-30.47 Mpa
UIC774-3 recommendation:-30.67 MPa
Resultdue to temperature 35 degreescentigrade onbridge deckand
50 degreescentigrade onrails: -150.17 Mpa
UIC774-3 recommendation:156.67 MPa
Validation of the maximum additional stresses due to train moving loads
Validation of thermal loads
Additional stressat 0 pointfrom right pierdue to train loading:181.38 Mpa
UIC774-3 recommendation:182.4 MPa
Maximumadditional stressesdue to train moving
loads:-195.05 MPa
Track-BridgeInteraction Verification
Rail bridge and composite girder bridge analysis

More Related Content

What's hot

Rigid Pavements Design Part - I
Rigid Pavements Design Part - IRigid Pavements Design Part - I
Rigid Pavements Design Part - I
Sachin Kulkarni
 
Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)
Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)
Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)Ankit Singh
 
Bridge engineering
Bridge engineeringBridge engineering
Bridge engineering
Pooja Lonare
 
Ch7 Box Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metw...
Ch7 Box Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metw...Ch7 Box Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metw...
Ch7 Box Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metw...
Hossam Shafiq II
 
Ppt bridges &amp; types
Ppt bridges &amp; typesPpt bridges &amp; types
Ppt bridges &amp; types
pratik vanam
 
BRIDGE OVERVIEW
BRIDGE OVERVIEWBRIDGE OVERVIEW
BRIDGE OVERVIEW
PRABHAT RAJPUT
 
Bridges and its Types & Components by Chetan Bisht
Bridges and its Types & Components by  Chetan BishtBridges and its Types & Components by  Chetan Bisht
Bridges and its Types & Components by Chetan Bisht
ChetanBisht16
 
unit-3.ppt
unit-3.pptunit-3.ppt
unit-3.ppt
sabishanu
 
Inspection and maintenance of bridge
Inspection and maintenance of bridgeInspection and maintenance of bridge
Inspection and maintenance of bridge
AKASH SHAH
 
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RAILWAY STEEL AND COCRETE BRIDGE & NON DESTRUCTIVE TE...
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RAILWAY STEEL AND COCRETE BRIDGE &  NON DESTRUCTIVE TE...ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RAILWAY STEEL AND COCRETE BRIDGE &  NON DESTRUCTIVE TE...
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RAILWAY STEEL AND COCRETE BRIDGE & NON DESTRUCTIVE TE...
GLA University
 
Stress ribbon bridge
Stress ribbon bridgeStress ribbon bridge
Stress ribbon bridge
Shreya Thusoo
 
Larsen and Toubro (Lucknow Metro Project) Summer Internship Presentation
Larsen and Toubro (Lucknow Metro Project) Summer Internship PresentationLarsen and Toubro (Lucknow Metro Project) Summer Internship Presentation
Larsen and Toubro (Lucknow Metro Project) Summer Internship Presentation
ShuBham RaNa
 
Design and Analysis of Pre Stressed I Girders by Midas Civil Software
Design and Analysis of Pre Stressed I Girders by Midas Civil SoftwareDesign and Analysis of Pre Stressed I Girders by Midas Civil Software
Design and Analysis of Pre Stressed I Girders by Midas Civil Software
ijtsrd
 
Study of Bridge Bearings
Study of Bridge BearingsStudy of Bridge Bearings
Study of Bridge Bearings
AyushHajare
 
DESIGN OF T BEAM BRIDGE PROCEDURE
DESIGN OF T BEAM BRIDGE PROCEDUREDESIGN OF T BEAM BRIDGE PROCEDURE
DESIGN OF T BEAM BRIDGE PROCEDURE
babji syed
 
Deck slab bridge
Deck slab bridgeDeck slab bridge
Deck slab bridge
Animesh Verma
 
Bridge loading and bridge design fundamentals
Bridge loading and bridge design fundamentalsBridge loading and bridge design fundamentals
Bridge loading and bridge design fundamentals
Madujith Sagara
 
Ch5 Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Me...
Ch5 Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Me...Ch5 Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Me...
Ch5 Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Me...
Hossam Shafiq II
 
Flexible pavement design by aashto method
Flexible pavement design by aashto methodFlexible pavement design by aashto method
Flexible pavement design by aashto method
Bhavya Jaiswal
 
Bridge construction methods aug 2007
Bridge construction methods aug 2007Bridge construction methods aug 2007
Bridge construction methods aug 2007
jose bonifacio de souza leite cuadros
 

What's hot (20)

Rigid Pavements Design Part - I
Rigid Pavements Design Part - IRigid Pavements Design Part - I
Rigid Pavements Design Part - I
 
Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)
Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)
Design of t beam bridge using wsm(2)
 
Bridge engineering
Bridge engineeringBridge engineering
Bridge engineering
 
Ch7 Box Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metw...
Ch7 Box Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metw...Ch7 Box Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metw...
Ch7 Box Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Metw...
 
Ppt bridges &amp; types
Ppt bridges &amp; typesPpt bridges &amp; types
Ppt bridges &amp; types
 
BRIDGE OVERVIEW
BRIDGE OVERVIEWBRIDGE OVERVIEW
BRIDGE OVERVIEW
 
Bridges and its Types & Components by Chetan Bisht
Bridges and its Types & Components by  Chetan BishtBridges and its Types & Components by  Chetan Bisht
Bridges and its Types & Components by Chetan Bisht
 
unit-3.ppt
unit-3.pptunit-3.ppt
unit-3.ppt
 
Inspection and maintenance of bridge
Inspection and maintenance of bridgeInspection and maintenance of bridge
Inspection and maintenance of bridge
 
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RAILWAY STEEL AND COCRETE BRIDGE & NON DESTRUCTIVE TE...
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RAILWAY STEEL AND COCRETE BRIDGE &  NON DESTRUCTIVE TE...ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RAILWAY STEEL AND COCRETE BRIDGE &  NON DESTRUCTIVE TE...
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF RAILWAY STEEL AND COCRETE BRIDGE & NON DESTRUCTIVE TE...
 
Stress ribbon bridge
Stress ribbon bridgeStress ribbon bridge
Stress ribbon bridge
 
Larsen and Toubro (Lucknow Metro Project) Summer Internship Presentation
Larsen and Toubro (Lucknow Metro Project) Summer Internship PresentationLarsen and Toubro (Lucknow Metro Project) Summer Internship Presentation
Larsen and Toubro (Lucknow Metro Project) Summer Internship Presentation
 
Design and Analysis of Pre Stressed I Girders by Midas Civil Software
Design and Analysis of Pre Stressed I Girders by Midas Civil SoftwareDesign and Analysis of Pre Stressed I Girders by Midas Civil Software
Design and Analysis of Pre Stressed I Girders by Midas Civil Software
 
Study of Bridge Bearings
Study of Bridge BearingsStudy of Bridge Bearings
Study of Bridge Bearings
 
DESIGN OF T BEAM BRIDGE PROCEDURE
DESIGN OF T BEAM BRIDGE PROCEDUREDESIGN OF T BEAM BRIDGE PROCEDURE
DESIGN OF T BEAM BRIDGE PROCEDURE
 
Deck slab bridge
Deck slab bridgeDeck slab bridge
Deck slab bridge
 
Bridge loading and bridge design fundamentals
Bridge loading and bridge design fundamentalsBridge loading and bridge design fundamentals
Bridge loading and bridge design fundamentals
 
Ch5 Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Me...
Ch5 Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Me...Ch5 Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Me...
Ch5 Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. Me...
 
Flexible pavement design by aashto method
Flexible pavement design by aashto methodFlexible pavement design by aashto method
Flexible pavement design by aashto method
 
Bridge construction methods aug 2007
Bridge construction methods aug 2007Bridge construction methods aug 2007
Bridge construction methods aug 2007
 

Viewers also liked

Innovations of civil engineering
Innovations of civil engineeringInnovations of civil engineering
Innovations of civil engineering
Abhijit Pal
 
Comparative analysis and design of box girder bridge sub structure with two di
Comparative analysis and design of box girder bridge sub structure with two diComparative analysis and design of box girder bridge sub structure with two di
Comparative analysis and design of box girder bridge sub structure with two diIAEME Publication
 
Floating city
Floating city Floating city
Floating city
Dani Rud
 
Interlinking of rivers (NRLP)
Interlinking of rivers (NRLP)Interlinking of rivers (NRLP)
Interlinking of rivers (NRLP)
chitikeshi omprakash
 
FLOATING CITY
FLOATING CITYFLOATING CITY
FLOATING CITY
Sumit
 
Most recent discoveries in the feild of Construction engineering.
Most recent discoveries in the feild of Construction engineering.Most recent discoveries in the feild of Construction engineering.
Most recent discoveries in the feild of Construction engineering.
Faisal Rasool
 
STEEL BRIDGE GIRDERS & PSC BRIDGE SLABS
STEEL BRIDGE GIRDERS & PSC BRIDGE SLABSSTEEL BRIDGE GIRDERS & PSC BRIDGE SLABS
STEEL BRIDGE GIRDERS & PSC BRIDGE SLABS
Al Hakam Khan
 
Applications of rock classifications
Applications of rock classifications Applications of rock classifications
Applications of rock classifications
Sourabh Jain
 
M.Tech Structural Engineering Project on Voided and Cellular Bridge introduction
M.Tech Structural Engineering Project on Voided and Cellular Bridge introductionM.Tech Structural Engineering Project on Voided and Cellular Bridge introduction
M.Tech Structural Engineering Project on Voided and Cellular Bridge introduction
vaignan
 
Finite element modelling and analysis in ansys workbench
Finite element modelling and analysis in ansys workbenchFinite element modelling and analysis in ansys workbench
Finite element modelling and analysis in ansys workbench
Sanjeet Kumar Singh
 
Innovating the-public-sector-conference-conclusions-2014
Innovating the-public-sector-conference-conclusions-2014Innovating the-public-sector-conference-conclusions-2014
Innovating the-public-sector-conference-conclusions-2014
OECD Governance
 
Ansys Workbench Basics
Ansys Workbench BasicsAnsys Workbench Basics
Ansys Workbench Basics
Aryan Gupta
 
Pervious Concrete: Getting Down to the Details
Pervious Concrete: Getting Down to the DetailsPervious Concrete: Getting Down to the Details
Pervious Concrete: Getting Down to the Details
Sean Van Delist
 
Cable stayed bridge
Cable stayed bridgeCable stayed bridge
Cable stayed bridge
Sadek Abdelraheem
 
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTS
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTSCONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTS
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTS
shalz_singh
 
Finite Element Simulation with Ansys Workbench 14
Finite Element Simulation with Ansys Workbench 14Finite Element Simulation with Ansys Workbench 14
Finite Element Simulation with Ansys Workbench 14
Prem Prakash Pandey
 
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
IOSR Journals
 
nanotechnology in civil engineering
nanotechnology in civil engineeringnanotechnology in civil engineering
nanotechnology in civil engineering
Sameer Charan
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Innovations of civil engineering
Innovations of civil engineeringInnovations of civil engineering
Innovations of civil engineering
 
Comparative analysis and design of box girder bridge sub structure with two di
Comparative analysis and design of box girder bridge sub structure with two diComparative analysis and design of box girder bridge sub structure with two di
Comparative analysis and design of box girder bridge sub structure with two di
 
Floating city
Floating city Floating city
Floating city
 
Interlinking of rivers (NRLP)
Interlinking of rivers (NRLP)Interlinking of rivers (NRLP)
Interlinking of rivers (NRLP)
 
Soil Improvement Techniques
Soil Improvement TechniquesSoil Improvement Techniques
Soil Improvement Techniques
 
FLOATING CITY
FLOATING CITYFLOATING CITY
FLOATING CITY
 
Most recent discoveries in the feild of Construction engineering.
Most recent discoveries in the feild of Construction engineering.Most recent discoveries in the feild of Construction engineering.
Most recent discoveries in the feild of Construction engineering.
 
STEEL BRIDGE GIRDERS & PSC BRIDGE SLABS
STEEL BRIDGE GIRDERS & PSC BRIDGE SLABSSTEEL BRIDGE GIRDERS & PSC BRIDGE SLABS
STEEL BRIDGE GIRDERS & PSC BRIDGE SLABS
 
Applications of rock classifications
Applications of rock classifications Applications of rock classifications
Applications of rock classifications
 
M.Tech Structural Engineering Project on Voided and Cellular Bridge introduction
M.Tech Structural Engineering Project on Voided and Cellular Bridge introductionM.Tech Structural Engineering Project on Voided and Cellular Bridge introduction
M.Tech Structural Engineering Project on Voided and Cellular Bridge introduction
 
Finite element modelling and analysis in ansys workbench
Finite element modelling and analysis in ansys workbenchFinite element modelling and analysis in ansys workbench
Finite element modelling and analysis in ansys workbench
 
Innovating the-public-sector-conference-conclusions-2014
Innovating the-public-sector-conference-conclusions-2014Innovating the-public-sector-conference-conclusions-2014
Innovating the-public-sector-conference-conclusions-2014
 
Ansys Workbench Basics
Ansys Workbench BasicsAnsys Workbench Basics
Ansys Workbench Basics
 
Pervious Concrete: Getting Down to the Details
Pervious Concrete: Getting Down to the DetailsPervious Concrete: Getting Down to the Details
Pervious Concrete: Getting Down to the Details
 
Cable stayed bridge
Cable stayed bridgeCable stayed bridge
Cable stayed bridge
 
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTS
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTSCONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTS
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENTS
 
Finite Element Simulation with Ansys Workbench 14
Finite Element Simulation with Ansys Workbench 14Finite Element Simulation with Ansys Workbench 14
Finite Element Simulation with Ansys Workbench 14
 
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
 
Ansys tutorial
Ansys tutorialAnsys tutorial
Ansys tutorial
 
nanotechnology in civil engineering
nanotechnology in civil engineeringnanotechnology in civil engineering
nanotechnology in civil engineering
 

Similar to Rail bridge and composite girder bridge analysis

Project_midas[1].pptx
Project_midas[1].pptxProject_midas[1].pptx
Project_midas[1].pptx
MRVOLDEMORT1
 
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Curve Cable-Stayed Bridge
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Curve Cable-Stayed BridgeIRJET- Seismic Analysis of Curve Cable-Stayed Bridge
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Curve Cable-Stayed Bridge
IRJET Journal
 
Behaviour of the track in hot weather. Rail thermal forces for jointed and CW...
Behaviour of the track in hot weather. Rail thermal forces for jointed and CW...Behaviour of the track in hot weather. Rail thermal forces for jointed and CW...
Behaviour of the track in hot weather. Rail thermal forces for jointed and CW...
Constantin Ciobanu
 
lecturenote_1888016911chapter-3 track.pdf
lecturenote_1888016911chapter-3 track.pdflecturenote_1888016911chapter-3 track.pdf
lecturenote_1888016911chapter-3 track.pdf
ssuser75acc8
 
Analysis and Design of Power Transmission Lines Steel Towers.docx
Analysis and Design of Power Transmission Lines Steel Towers.docxAnalysis and Design of Power Transmission Lines Steel Towers.docx
Analysis and Design of Power Transmission Lines Steel Towers.docx
Adnan Lazem
 
Parametric Study on Curved Bridges Subjected to Seismic Loading
Parametric Study on Curved Bridges Subjected to Seismic LoadingParametric Study on Curved Bridges Subjected to Seismic Loading
Parametric Study on Curved Bridges Subjected to Seismic Loading
IRJET Journal
 
Analysis of cable stayed bridges
Analysis of cable stayed bridgesAnalysis of cable stayed bridges
Analysis of cable stayed bridges
ParamaAthmeka
 
Rail Structure Interaction Analysis of Steel Composite Metro Bridge
Rail Structure Interaction Analysis of Steel Composite Metro BridgeRail Structure Interaction Analysis of Steel Composite Metro Bridge
Rail Structure Interaction Analysis of Steel Composite Metro Bridge
IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Comparing the Load Pattern on Box Concrete Gridder with Consideration ...
IRJET- Comparing the Load Pattern on Box Concrete Gridder with Consideration ...IRJET- Comparing the Load Pattern on Box Concrete Gridder with Consideration ...
IRJET- Comparing the Load Pattern on Box Concrete Gridder with Consideration ...
IRJET Journal
 
Bridge
BridgeBridge
Bridge
Arpit Mathur
 
Introductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-converted
Introductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-convertedIntroductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-converted
Introductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-converted
naveen kumar
 
Acm Space Frames
Acm Space FramesAcm Space Frames
Acm Space Frames
Aaqib Iqbal
 
Calculation Note Final
Calculation Note FinalCalculation Note Final
Calculation Note FinalMohamed Elfike
 
Sonali ppt.pptx
Sonali ppt.pptxSonali ppt.pptx
Sonali ppt.pptx
RBTV1
 
IRJET - Dynamic Analysis of Steel Truss Bridge under Various Combinational Mo...
IRJET - Dynamic Analysis of Steel Truss Bridge under Various Combinational Mo...IRJET - Dynamic Analysis of Steel Truss Bridge under Various Combinational Mo...
IRJET - Dynamic Analysis of Steel Truss Bridge under Various Combinational Mo...
IRJET Journal
 
Presentation on construction of cable stay bridge - a modern technique for su...
Presentation on construction of cable stay bridge - a modern technique for su...Presentation on construction of cable stay bridge - a modern technique for su...
Presentation on construction of cable stay bridge - a modern technique for su...
Rajesh Prasad
 
Bridge
Bridge Bridge
Bridge illpa
 
Calculation note suez canal cable stayed bridge
Calculation note suez canal cable stayed bridgeCalculation note suez canal cable stayed bridge
Calculation note suez canal cable stayed bridgeMohammed Abdelkawy
 
Design and Analysis of Transmission Tower at Allahabad
Design and Analysis of Transmission Tower at AllahabadDesign and Analysis of Transmission Tower at Allahabad
Design and Analysis of Transmission Tower at Allahabad
Abhijit Kumar
 
IRJET- Comparative Study of Effect of Varying Span Length on Major Elemen...
IRJET-  	  Comparative Study of Effect of Varying Span Length on Major Elemen...IRJET-  	  Comparative Study of Effect of Varying Span Length on Major Elemen...
IRJET- Comparative Study of Effect of Varying Span Length on Major Elemen...
IRJET Journal
 

Similar to Rail bridge and composite girder bridge analysis (20)

Project_midas[1].pptx
Project_midas[1].pptxProject_midas[1].pptx
Project_midas[1].pptx
 
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Curve Cable-Stayed Bridge
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Curve Cable-Stayed BridgeIRJET- Seismic Analysis of Curve Cable-Stayed Bridge
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Curve Cable-Stayed Bridge
 
Behaviour of the track in hot weather. Rail thermal forces for jointed and CW...
Behaviour of the track in hot weather. Rail thermal forces for jointed and CW...Behaviour of the track in hot weather. Rail thermal forces for jointed and CW...
Behaviour of the track in hot weather. Rail thermal forces for jointed and CW...
 
lecturenote_1888016911chapter-3 track.pdf
lecturenote_1888016911chapter-3 track.pdflecturenote_1888016911chapter-3 track.pdf
lecturenote_1888016911chapter-3 track.pdf
 
Analysis and Design of Power Transmission Lines Steel Towers.docx
Analysis and Design of Power Transmission Lines Steel Towers.docxAnalysis and Design of Power Transmission Lines Steel Towers.docx
Analysis and Design of Power Transmission Lines Steel Towers.docx
 
Parametric Study on Curved Bridges Subjected to Seismic Loading
Parametric Study on Curved Bridges Subjected to Seismic LoadingParametric Study on Curved Bridges Subjected to Seismic Loading
Parametric Study on Curved Bridges Subjected to Seismic Loading
 
Analysis of cable stayed bridges
Analysis of cable stayed bridgesAnalysis of cable stayed bridges
Analysis of cable stayed bridges
 
Rail Structure Interaction Analysis of Steel Composite Metro Bridge
Rail Structure Interaction Analysis of Steel Composite Metro BridgeRail Structure Interaction Analysis of Steel Composite Metro Bridge
Rail Structure Interaction Analysis of Steel Composite Metro Bridge
 
IRJET- Comparing the Load Pattern on Box Concrete Gridder with Consideration ...
IRJET- Comparing the Load Pattern on Box Concrete Gridder with Consideration ...IRJET- Comparing the Load Pattern on Box Concrete Gridder with Consideration ...
IRJET- Comparing the Load Pattern on Box Concrete Gridder with Consideration ...
 
Bridge
BridgeBridge
Bridge
 
Introductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-converted
Introductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-convertedIntroductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-converted
Introductiontobridges07 08-090507223401-phpapp02-converted
 
Acm Space Frames
Acm Space FramesAcm Space Frames
Acm Space Frames
 
Calculation Note Final
Calculation Note FinalCalculation Note Final
Calculation Note Final
 
Sonali ppt.pptx
Sonali ppt.pptxSonali ppt.pptx
Sonali ppt.pptx
 
IRJET - Dynamic Analysis of Steel Truss Bridge under Various Combinational Mo...
IRJET - Dynamic Analysis of Steel Truss Bridge under Various Combinational Mo...IRJET - Dynamic Analysis of Steel Truss Bridge under Various Combinational Mo...
IRJET - Dynamic Analysis of Steel Truss Bridge under Various Combinational Mo...
 
Presentation on construction of cable stay bridge - a modern technique for su...
Presentation on construction of cable stay bridge - a modern technique for su...Presentation on construction of cable stay bridge - a modern technique for su...
Presentation on construction of cable stay bridge - a modern technique for su...
 
Bridge
Bridge Bridge
Bridge
 
Calculation note suez canal cable stayed bridge
Calculation note suez canal cable stayed bridgeCalculation note suez canal cable stayed bridge
Calculation note suez canal cable stayed bridge
 
Design and Analysis of Transmission Tower at Allahabad
Design and Analysis of Transmission Tower at AllahabadDesign and Analysis of Transmission Tower at Allahabad
Design and Analysis of Transmission Tower at Allahabad
 
IRJET- Comparative Study of Effect of Varying Span Length on Major Elemen...
IRJET-  	  Comparative Study of Effect of Varying Span Length on Major Elemen...IRJET-  	  Comparative Study of Effect of Varying Span Length on Major Elemen...
IRJET- Comparative Study of Effect of Varying Span Length on Major Elemen...
 

More from MIDAS Information Technology

midas NFX 2015 is Released. Accurate FEA whenever you need!
midas NFX 2015 is Released. Accurate FEA whenever you need!midas NFX 2015 is Released. Accurate FEA whenever you need!
midas NFX 2015 is Released. Accurate FEA whenever you need!
MIDAS Information Technology
 
Release Note: midas Civil 2014 v2.1
Release Note: midas Civil 2014 v2.1Release Note: midas Civil 2014 v2.1
Release Note: midas Civil 2014 v2.1
MIDAS Information Technology
 
midas NFX 2013: Towards a New Generation of Mechanical FEA Solution
midas NFX 2013: Towards a New Generation of Mechanical FEA Solutionmidas NFX 2013: Towards a New Generation of Mechanical FEA Solution
midas NFX 2013: Towards a New Generation of Mechanical FEA Solution
MIDAS Information Technology
 
Midas Gen catalog
Midas Gen catalogMidas Gen catalog
Midas Gen catalog
MIDAS Information Technology
 
Midas civil catalog
Midas civil catalogMidas civil catalog
Midas civil catalog
MIDAS Information Technology
 

More from MIDAS Information Technology (7)

midas NFX 2015 is Released. Accurate FEA whenever you need!
midas NFX 2015 is Released. Accurate FEA whenever you need!midas NFX 2015 is Released. Accurate FEA whenever you need!
midas NFX 2015 is Released. Accurate FEA whenever you need!
 
Release Note: midas Civil 2014 v2.1
Release Note: midas Civil 2014 v2.1Release Note: midas Civil 2014 v2.1
Release Note: midas Civil 2014 v2.1
 
midas NFX 2013: Towards a New Generation of Mechanical FEA Solution
midas NFX 2013: Towards a New Generation of Mechanical FEA Solutionmidas NFX 2013: Towards a New Generation of Mechanical FEA Solution
midas NFX 2013: Towards a New Generation of Mechanical FEA Solution
 
Project application of midas gen
Project application of midas genProject application of midas gen
Project application of midas gen
 
Project application of midas civil
Project application of midas civilProject application of midas civil
Project application of midas civil
 
Midas Gen catalog
Midas Gen catalogMidas Gen catalog
Midas Gen catalog
 
Midas civil catalog
Midas civil catalogMidas civil catalog
Midas civil catalog
 

Recently uploaded

Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionGenerative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Aggregage
 
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
名前 です男
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
Quotidiano Piemontese
 
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
DianaGray10
 
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial ApplicationsLarge Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications
Rohit Gautam
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
Neo4j
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the  Possible with Graph - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the  Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
Neo4j
 
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
James Anderson
 
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the FutureVideo Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Alpen-Adria-Universität
 
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofszkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
Alex Pruden
 
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 202420240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
Matthew Sinclair
 
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxHow to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
danishmna97
 
By Design, not by Accident - Agile Venture Bolzano 2024
By Design, not by Accident - Agile Venture Bolzano 2024By Design, not by Accident - Agile Venture Bolzano 2024
By Design, not by Accident - Agile Venture Bolzano 2024
Pierluigi Pugliese
 
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Nexer Digital
 
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfObservability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Paige Cruz
 
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysPushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Adtran
 
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
KatiaHIMEUR1
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
Neo4j
 
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AIMind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Kumud Singh
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
DianaGray10
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionGenerative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to Production
 
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの?40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの?えこ...
 
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practicesNational Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
National Security Agency - NSA mobile device best practices
 
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
 
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial ApplicationsLarge Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications
Large Language Model (LLM) and it’s Geospatial Applications
 
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the  Possible with Graph - Q2 2024GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the  Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024
 
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...
 
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the FutureVideo Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
Video Streaming: Then, Now, and in the Future
 
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex ProofszkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
zkStudyClub - Reef: Fast Succinct Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Regex Proofs
 
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 202420240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
 
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxHow to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptx
 
By Design, not by Accident - Agile Venture Bolzano 2024
By Design, not by Accident - Agile Venture Bolzano 2024By Design, not by Accident - Agile Venture Bolzano 2024
By Design, not by Accident - Agile Venture Bolzano 2024
 
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
Elizabeth Buie - Older adults: Are we really designing for our future selves?
 
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfObservability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdf
 
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysPushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 days
 
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !
 
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...
 
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AIMind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
Mind map of terminologies used in context of Generative AI
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
 

Rail bridge and composite girder bridge analysis

  • 1. 111-1 M I D A S I T Bridging YourInnovations to Realities
  • 2. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 2 Rail Structure Interaction Overview 1) Definition of Continuous Welded Rail (CWR) Rails are continuously welded and thus, the length of one rail is longer than 200m. ex > standard length rail (L=25m), longer rail (L=25~200m) 2) Necessity of Continuous Welded Rail Time[ms] Dynamicamplification Q Q 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 16 18 20 221412108642 Wheel/rail impact forces Wheel impact forces occur - The reduced impact force in the rails increases the life span of the rails and improves the ride quality. - The decreasing noise and vibration by the reduced impact force is less impeding the ambient environment. 3) Check Points for Continuous Welded Rail - When temperature rises: track deformation (buckling of rail) - When temperature drops: fracture failure
  • 3. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 3 Rail Structure Interaction Traction/Braking loads abutment pier Longitudinal displacements at top surface of deck end Temperature Train vertical loads Track-BridgeInteraction
  • 4. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 4 Rail Structure Interaction Track-BridgeInteraction 1) Axial Forcesin a ContinuouslyWeldedRail Track on Embankment (Thermal Load on the Rail) 2) Axial Forcesin a ContinuouslyWeldedRail Track on Bridge (Thermal Load on the Bridge) Axial forces in the track on embankment under thermal loading Track/bridge interaction due to thermal loading Fixed end Movable end Continuous welded rail Additional rail stresses Axial forces in the rails Distance (m) Displacementintherails(mm) Resistance TAEF ∆×××= α
  • 5. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 5 Rail Structure Interaction Design Requirementsfor Track/Bridge Interaction Analysis Design Standards: UIC774-3, EN 1991-2 Item Loads DesignCriteria Gravel ballast bed Concrete bed Additional rail stress Compressive stress Thermal loads Traction/braking loads Train vertical loads R≥1500: 72N/mm2 R≥700: 58N/mm2 R≥600: 54N/mm2 R≥300: 27N/mm2 92N/mm2 Tensile stress 92N/mm2 92N/mm2 Longitudinal relative displacement in bridge deck Traction/braking loads <5mm <30mm (when rail expansion device at both ends) Check the stability (the uplift force and compression) of rail fastener longitudinal displacement due to rotation of the deck end between deck and deck or between deck and pier Train vertical loads <8mm Check the stability (the uplift force and compression) of rail fastener Opening displacement when split web at rail end takes place (applying cable signaling system or zero-longitudinal resistance rail (ZLR) fastener) Thermal loads D=√(R2-(R-δ)2) Same as the gravel track
  • 6. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 6 Rail Structure Interaction Design Loads - If all of the spans in the bridge consist of a continuous welded rail, thermal loads are applied to the bridge and rails or the rails only. - If rail expansion joints are present on the bridge, thermal loads are applied to both the bridge and the rails. - Temperature variations in the rails and bridge are as follows: . Rails: in summer=+40℃, in winter=-50℃ . Bridge: concrete structures=±25℃, steel structures= normal temperature area ±35℃, cold temperature area ± 45℃ 1) Thermal Loads 2) Traction/Braking Loads - Traction/braking loads are uniformly distributed and applied to the two front positions of the rails. The magnitude of load and the loaded length are as follows: - For the cases such as an exclusive subway track, light rail transit, etc where the design loads are different, transformed uniform loads which correspond to ¼ of the rail axial loads are used. The loaded length is equal to one maximum coach. - Traction/braking loads are applied concurrently with the associated vertical loads. - Traction/braking loads are applied to the positions that will cause the most unfavorable rail stresses or bridge deformations. Type of Track Tractionloads braking loads Magnitude of Load Loadedlength Magnitude of Load Loadedlength High-speedrailway 33kN/m/track 33m 20kN/m/track 400m Normal railway 24kN/m/track 33m 12kN/m/track 300m
  • 7. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 7 Rail Structure Interaction Design Loads -For a high-speed railway, HL load does not include an impact factor. For a passenger locomotive, HL load can have a uniform load of 60kN/m. - For a normal railway, LS load and an equivalent load can be applied and an impact factor is not considered. - For an exclusive subway track, EL-18 load or an equivalent uniformly distributed load can be applied. - For a double or more track bridge, only two tracks will be loaded with train vertical loads. - For a multi-span continuous bridge, only the deck near the critical positions will be loaded. 3) Train Vertical Loads (b) Equivalent HL load (a) HL load (b) Equivalent LS load (a) LS load (L-load) 95kN/m 74kN/m
  • 8. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 8 Rail Structure Interaction Load Combinations - Load combinations used for computing the rail stresses and the longitudinal loads acting on bearings - When computing the stresses and displacements in the rails for a continuous or simply supported bridge deck: α,β,γ=1 - When using the computational analysis method, the interaction due to traction/braking loads and train vertical loads can be separately computed. ƩR = αR (Thermal loads) + βR(Traction/braking loads)+γR(Train vertical loads)
  • 9. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 9 Rail Structure Interaction 1) Establishment of Criteria for Construction of Rail Expansion Joint on BridgeSection RailExpansion Joint Countermeasure The limits to the axial force and displacement of a continuous welded rail on bridge are exceeded bridge track Support layout Span composition Stiffness of deck Use zero-longitudinal resistance rail fasteners Economicefficiency Compare the maintenance cost forrail expansion joints with the cost of bridge construction Conditions for building rail expansion joints  Minimum separated distance between expansion joints  Separation distance from a turnout  Separation distance from the terminus for a transition curve  Separation distance from the terminus for a bell curve  Requirements for building the bridge deck
  • 10. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 10 Rail Structure Interaction 2) Flowchart RailExpansion Joint Check the axial force and displacement in the rails Modify the support placement Check the axial force and displacement in the rails Modify the span composition Check the axial force and displacement in the rails Modify the stiffness of deck Check the axial force and displacement in the rails Use a zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener Check the axial force and displacement in the rails Consider building REJ (rail expansion joint) Analyze the economical efficiency Submit the report Allow the constructionof rail expansion joint ContinueOK OK OK OK OK OK NG NG NG NG NG NG NG NG NG NG
  • 11. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 11 Rail Structure Interaction 1) Computational Analysis - Considerations for modeling • Placement of bearings, the dimensions and properties of the deck and pier, the bending stiffness and the height of deck, the neutral axis of deck, and the lateral and bending stiffness of foundation. - Finite elements • Rail and bridge: Beam elements • Ballast or pad: nonlinear spring elements - Modeling method • Element length: 1~2m is recommended 상판중립축 궤도중심선 Rigid Link Rigid Link Track-BridgeInteraction Analysis Embankment section Bridge deck Springfor the longitudinal resistance of ballast (Bilinear) Rail Rail expansion joint Neutral axis of bridge deck Centerline of track Bearing Longitudinal displacement of the rail 1. Observed data 2. Idealized bilinear curve (under train loading) 3. Bilinear curve when train loading is not applied Longitudinal resistance of the roadbed
  • 12. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 12 Rail Structure Interaction - The accuracy depends on the computational analysis methods. - The following two computational analysis methods are available: . Separate analysis: thermal loading, traction/braking loading and train vertical loading are separately considered. . Complete Analysis: thermal loading, traction/braking loading and train vertical loading are concurrently applied. - Depending on the global structural system, the separate analysis is more likely to producethe greater axial forcesthan the staged analysis. AnalysisMethods
  • 13. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 13 Rail Structure Interaction Simplified Separate Analysis Complete Analysis AnalysisMethods
  • 14. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 14 Rail Structure Interaction RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Layout) Advanced:define the fixedendsfreelyand adjustthe spanlength ZLR: Specifythe zero-longitudinalresistance rail fastener(the resistance of ballastissetto zerofor the specifiedsections.) REJ: Place the rail expansionjointforeachtrack ex ) 4@50,70:four decks with the length of 50m and a deck with the length of 70m. The total length of bridge section is 270m.
  • 15. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 15 Rail Structure Interaction TaperedSectionAssignment Sectionsat 0.1 of the total span length:Span_2 Sectionsat 0.5 of the total span length:Span Sectionsat 0.9 of the total span length:Span_2 TaperedOption Start 0.1~Start 0.5: Z Axis CurvedType (Quadratic) , From (J-end) Start 0.5~Start 0.9: Z Axis CurvedType (Quadratic) , From (I-end) Define TaperedSection RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Section)
  • 16. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 16 Rail Structure Interaction 1 . Lateral Resistance Data - Enter gravel ballast data and concrete ballast data. - For gravel ballast,the resistance of ballast isdifferentbetweenthe stress checkand the displacementcheck. 2. Define Condition - Selecteithergravel ballastor concrete ballast for the entire section. - Via the ‘Advanced’function,selecteithergravel ballast or concrete ballastby sections(Forundefinedsections,gravel ballastisused). 3. Boundary Types Spring Type Bearing Type 1 23 RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Boundaries)
  • 17. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 17 Rail Structure Interaction 4. ModelingbySections 1) Embankment section 5. Boundary ConditionsTaking into Account the Effective Length The resistance ofballast enteredshouldbe in kN/m and islongitudinal resistance. The resistance multipliedbythe effective lengthwill be usedin the model. 2) Section connecting embankment and deck start point 3) Section connecting deck start and end points RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Boundaries)
  • 18. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 18 Rail Structure Interaction 1. Accelerating/braking/vertical train loadscan be freelyenteredbysectionsin a tabular format. The length and magnitude of load can be enteredwithreference tothe leftendof the model. -RunningDirection:the direction in which the train runs.Define either‘KeepRight’or ‘KeepLeft’. -TrainSection: Train sectionis recognizedwhenavertical load is entered. Whenavertical Load is excluded,define TrainSectionandapply Loaded Condition. - Load Type:For single track, in general,applyeitheraccelerating loadsor brakingloads. Fordouble track, apply acceleratingloads andbraking loads foreachtrack. Asfar as train vertical loads are concerned, variousuniformloadscan be appliedby sectionsandtherefore HLload, which is most frequentlyused,canbe easilyrepresented. 2. Filesare added for the moving load analysis - Number ofTrack LoadingLocations: the numberof movingtimesof train load.If “n” is entered,nfilesare added. - Location Incrementfor eachModel:the incrementof moving load pertrack. If “n” is entered,the trainmovesbyn and the boundaryconditions are assignedtothe sectionto which the train load is applied. ex> If “Number of Track Loading Locations” is 3 and “Location Increment for Track” is 10, the train moves forward by 10m, 20m and 30m and three files are added. Case 1: Single Track Case 2: Double Track RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard (Load)
  • 19. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 19 Rail Structure Interaction RailTrack AnalysisModel Wizard 1 .StressCheck Model Option Thisoptioncreatesa file to checkthe additionalstresses. -SimplifiedSeparate AnalysisModel -Complete Analysis 2. DisplacementCheckModel Option Thisoptioncreatesa file to checkthe displacements. Inthisfile,the resistance of ballast applied at UnloadedConditionisdifferentforthe case of gravelballast.In addition, this file is available only for SimplifiedSeparate AnalysisModel. - Relative LongitudinalDisplacementComponentdue toAccelerationandBrakingAlone - Relative LongitudinalDisplacementComponentdue toVerticalEffects -Relative LongitudinalDisplacementComponentatRailExpansionJoints - Rail Break GapSize
  • 20. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 20 Rail Structure Interaction CaseStudies Forthe case of a high-speedrailwaywithgravel ballast and double track,the following propertiesare definedforrail, ballast and horizontal alignment: Track Item Property Unit Value Remark Rail UIC60 Cross-sectionalarea A m2 7.669E-3 Moment of inertia Iyy m4 30.363E-6 Ballast Gravelballast Longitudinal resistance (Unloaded) kN/m 12.0~20.0 Stress check: 20.0 Displacement check: 12.0 Longitudinal resistance (Loaded) kN/m 60.0 Limit displacement mm 2.0 Horizontal alignment Tangent section Girder Type Span Length Equivalent Modulus of Elasticity Cross- sectional Area Moment of Inertia Neutral Axis (Girder Reference Location) Main Girder Height ( m ) ( E : N/m2 ) ( A : m2 ) ( Iyy : m4 ) ( Izz : m4 ) ( d : m ) ( H : m ) PC Box 40 2.8 x 1010 12.0 20.0 165.0 1.11 3.5 PCBox girder bridge is chosenfor the high-speedrailwaytrack. The dimensionsof girderandthe geometricrelationbetweenthe girderandtrack are definedasfollows: The longitudinalresistance of deckis setto 1.5 x 10 6 kN/m.
  • 21. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 21 Rail Structure Interaction Forthe case of a high-speedrailwaywithgravel ballast and double track,the rail, ballast and horizontal alignmentare definedasfollows: Simple bridge type Continuousbridge type CaseStudies 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 40m 80m 80m 80m 80m 80m
  • 22. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 22 Rail Structure Interaction Axial stressby temperature load (Simple spanbridge) Axial stressby temperature load (Continuousbridge) Because the simple bridge type gives the smaller additional stress than the continuous bridge type, the simple bridge type is adopted. CaseStudies -26.6 MPa -44.1MPa
  • 23. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 23 Rail Structure Interaction CaseStudies Axial stressby temperature (+25°C) at UnloadedCondition Axial stressby temperature,traction and vertical train loads at LoadedCondition -35.6MPa -26.6 MPa
  • 24. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 24 Rail Structure Interaction CaseStudies Axial stressby temperature,braking and vertical train loadswith differenttrain position
  • 25. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 25 Rail Structure Interaction CheckDisplacements - Restrict the deformations of the deck and the track to prevent the excessive relaxation of ballast. - Limits to the relative lateral displacements between the bridge deck and rails under traction/braking loads: 4mm or less - Exceptions are made for the cases where the zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener is used and the special treatment is done for the contact underneath the rails. 2) Limits to the RelativeLongitudinal Displacements in the Bridge Deck 3) Limits to the Longitudinal Displacements in the Deck End due to the Angle of Rotation - Limits to the longitudinal displacements in the deck end due to the rotation of the deck end under train vertical loads: 8mm or less 1) RelativeDisplacements between the Rails and Bridge - Limits to the absolute longitudinal displacements between the bridge deck and pier or between the bridge deck and deck under traction/braking loads: 5mm or less Limits to relative longitudinal displacements Limits to displacements due to rotation of deck end abutment pier Longitudinal displacements at top surface of deck end
  • 26. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 26 Rail Structure Interaction Japanese Shinkansen Railway Structure Design Standard Conditions Allowable opening displacements -rail: 60kg -buckling strength of rail: 100tonf/rail 69mm ACI Manual of Concrete Practice Wheel radius Allowable opening displacements 16 in. (0.4m) or less 2in.(50mm) 16 in. or higher 4in.(100mm) CheckDisplacements 4) AllowableOpening Displacements when Opening Gap at Rail End takes place . - Allowable Opening Displacements According to International Standards - Allowable Opening Displacements According to Korean Standards . Railway Design Manual (Volume Track) 1) Limits to the opening displacements, d, when the split web at rail end takes place due to thermal loads in case of using cable signaling system (not track circuit system): 2 2 ( )d R R δ= − − 3 2 xP e x EI β δ β β − = 4 4 k EI β = 2) Restrict the opening displacements of (1) when a zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener is built Wheel loadP Center of wheel O Vehicle velocity V Wheel radius R Vertical displacement δBending stiffness of rail EI Bearing stiffness of trackK Opening displacement d
  • 27. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 27 Rail Structure Interaction Relative Longitudinal Displacementbytraction loads CaseStudies
  • 28. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 28 Rail Structure Interaction CaseStudies Tip> If the deck is defined by Center-Top, the nodal displacements at deck top are produced and these include the nodal displacements due to rotational angle. If the deck is defined by centroid, the nodal displacements at deck top can be computed using the following equation: Relative displacement due to rotation of the end = displacement Dx at neutral axis + distance from centroid to deck top x sin(Rot Ry) Relative Longitudinal Displacementbyvertical train loads
  • 29. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 29 Rail Structure Interaction FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Track (1) 1) Longitudinal Resistanceof Track Longitudinal resistance of trackvs. longitudinal displacement of rail Bi-Linear behavior of longitudinal resistance of track Allowable longitudinal resistance of track  Note 1: Apply 20.0kN/m when checking the rail stresses and apply 12.0kN/m when checking the displacements in the structure  Note 2: In the case when tests for longitudinal resistance are conducted, values derived from tests can be used. Type of Track Load Case Limit displacement (mm) Longitudinal resistance of track (kN/m) Remark Gravel track Loaded Case 2.0 12.0~20.0 Note 1 Unloaded Case 2.0 60.0 Concrete track or frozen ballast track Loaded Case 0.5 40.0 Note 2 Unloaded Case 0.5 60.0
  • 30. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 30 Rail Structure Interaction FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Track (1) Axial stresses of Ballast Bed in the longitudinal direction Axial stresses of Concrete Bed in the longitudinal direction Unloaded Condition (underthermal loads) Loaded Condition (traction/brakingloads and vertical loads added) Unloaded Condition (underthermal loads) Loaded Condition (traction/brakingloads and vertical loads added) Longitudinal axial stress is about 30% less in the ballast track than in the concrete track under the same conditions.
  • 31. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 31 Rail Structure Interaction 2) Zero-Longitudinal Resistance Rail (ZLR) Fastener inthe BridgeSection Characteristic behavior of zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener - The zero-longitudinal resistance rail fastener behaves similarly to the conventional rail fastener for the gravity load but generates a gap between the rail and the rail fastener not to introduce longitudinal resistance. <Gap between rail fastener and rail base> <Downslide of rigid body of rail fastener> <Vertical load-displacement diagram> FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Track (2) Installing ZLR fastener can reduce about 29% of the axial stress.
  • 32. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 32 Rail Structure Interaction 1) Expansion Length - Maximum expansion length recommended by UIC774-3 for a single deck railway bridge with gravel ballast not needing REJ (rail expansion joint) . 60m: Steel structure with gravel ballast track (the maximum length is 120m when a support exists in the middle) . 90m: Steel or concrete bridge with gravel ballast track and concrete slab (the maximum length is 180m when a support exists in the middle) . For the ballastless track, detailed analysis should be conducted. - Illustrations of expansion lengths L 2L FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (1) - Type 1 - Type 2 - Type 3 - Type 4
  • 33. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 33 Rail Structure Interaction FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (1) - Type 1 -Unloaded Condition : 26.48 MPa -Loaded Condition : 32.86 MPa -Unloaded Condition : 11.45 MPa -Loaded Condition : 14.07 MPa - Type 2
  • 34. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 34 Rail Structure Interaction FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (1) - Type 3 -Unloaded Condition : 26.52 MPa -Loaded Condition : 42.05 MPa -Unloaded Condition : 21.12 MPa -Loaded Condition : 26.43 MPa - Type 4 Axial stresses in the longitudinal direction under the same conditions: Type 2 (14.07 MPa) < Type 4 (26.43 MPa) < Type 1 (32.86 MPa) < Type 3 (42.05 Mpa)
  • 35. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 35 Rail Structure Interaction FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (2) 2) Span length 3) Bending stiffness of the deck and the deck height - Train vertical loads can cause the longitudinal deformations in the girder, and the span length is the factor causing the track/bridge interaction. - Because of the bending of deck, train vertical loads on bridge can cause interactions. - The bending of deck induces longitudinal deflections at top surface of the deck end and therefore causes the relaxation of gravel track. -The effect of bending in deck end 1.0 EI 1.5 EI 2.0 EI 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 0.1 Ko 0.5 Ko 1.0 Ko 2.0 Ko 10 Ko RailStress(MPa) 2@40M_FMM_Vertical Load Stiffness of Deck
  • 36. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 36 Rail Structure Interaction FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (3) 4) Support stiffness K: Total stiffness of support : relative displacement between the upperand lower parts of bearing -Factors affecting the support stiffness K Bending ofPier Rotation ofFoundation Displacement of Foundation
  • 37. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 37 Rail Structure Interaction FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (4) 5) Effects of support layout of bridge Axial forces by FF-MM type Axial forces by FM type -Types of bearing FFFF type FM type FMMF type FMM type MFM type MFMM type
  • 38. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 38 Rail Structure Interaction FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (4) Cases illustratingthe effects ofsupport layout ofbridge - Case1: Simple bridge ( 1@30 8 Span) Axial force is about 26% less for MFFM type (28.12 MPa) than in the FMFM type (38.08 MPa) when other conditions are identical. - Case 2: 2 span continuous bridge (2@30 4 Span) Axial force is about 45% less for MFM type (29.77 MPa) than in the FMM type (54.20 MPa) when other conditions are identical. FMFM type MFFM type MFM type FMM type 38.1 MPa 28.1 MPa 29.8 MPa 54.2 MPa
  • 39. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 39 Rail Structure Interaction FactorsAffecting the Axial Forcesin Bridge (4) 6) Axial forces affected by span composition Case 1 : 78.75 MPa > Case 2 : 60.63 MPa > Case 3 : 59.72 MPa Axial force is 24.2% less for Case 3 than in Case 1. 78.7 MPa 60.6MPa 59.7 MPa
  • 40. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 40 Rail Structure Interaction 1) Verificationof computational analysis - A computer program that performs the track/bridge interaction should be validated against the test cases specified in the Appendix 1.7.1 of UIC774-3. Percentage errors may be up to 10% and up to 20% for safety side. Standard dimensions recommended by UIC774-3 Result table for a simple span bridge specified in UIC774-3 Track-BridgeInteraction Verification
  • 41. Bridging Your Innovations to Realitiesmidas Civil 41 Rail Structure Interaction 2) Validation against UIC774-3 Resultdue to temperature 35 degreescentigrade onbridge deck: -30.47 Mpa UIC774-3 recommendation:-30.67 MPa Resultdue to temperature 35 degreescentigrade onbridge deckand 50 degreescentigrade onrails: -150.17 Mpa UIC774-3 recommendation:156.67 MPa Validation of the maximum additional stresses due to train moving loads Validation of thermal loads Additional stressat 0 pointfrom right pierdue to train loading:181.38 Mpa UIC774-3 recommendation:182.4 MPa Maximumadditional stressesdue to train moving loads:-195.05 MPa Track-BridgeInteraction Verification