This document provides an overview of qualitative research methods and analysis techniques. It discusses common qualitative data collection methods like interviews and observation. For analysis, it describes open coding to systematically analyze qualitative data by assigning codes to answers. It also covers affinity diagramming to group codes and findings into themes. The document emphasizes that qualitative research aims to understand meaning, context, processes and reasoning through rich descriptive data.
Qualitative Data Analysis I: Text Analysis - a summary based on Chapter 17 of H. Russell Bernard’s Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches for a Report for Anthro 297: Seminar in Research Design and Methods under Dr. Francisco Datar, Department of Anthropology, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines Diliman
Qualitative Data Analysis I: Text Analysis - a summary based on Chapter 17 of H. Russell Bernard’s Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches for a Report for Anthro 297: Seminar in Research Design and Methods under Dr. Francisco Datar, Department of Anthropology, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines Diliman
Data analysis chapter 18 from the companion website for educational researchYamith José Fandiño Parra
This is a slide show of chapter 18 from Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Primarily intended for instructor use in the classroom, it is also available for students’ study use or to review as an advance organizer before class lectures or discussions.
Qualitative data analysis: many approaches to understand user insightsAgnieszka Szóstek
The fifth lecture at HITLab, Canterbury University in New Zealand was all about how important it is to run a proper analysis of the qualitative data. We discussed the value in looking at data from individual (phenomenological) perspective versus combined (reductionist) perspective. But we agreed that regardless of the chosen approach it is crucial to look at the data from more than just one perspective to be sure the interpretation is not biased by researcher's on view of the world.
Data analysis chapter 18 from the companion website for educational researchYamith José Fandiño Parra
This is a slide show of chapter 18 from Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Primarily intended for instructor use in the classroom, it is also available for students’ study use or to review as an advance organizer before class lectures or discussions.
Qualitative data analysis: many approaches to understand user insightsAgnieszka Szóstek
The fifth lecture at HITLab, Canterbury University in New Zealand was all about how important it is to run a proper analysis of the qualitative data. We discussed the value in looking at data from individual (phenomenological) perspective versus combined (reductionist) perspective. But we agreed that regardless of the chosen approach it is crucial to look at the data from more than just one perspective to be sure the interpretation is not biased by researcher's on view of the world.
Regardless of which strategies used by researcher to present their qualitative data, the presentation will result in identifying and acknowledging the multiple perspectives of the participants and researcher and the readers may then consider all perspectives in their interpretation of the research. This Slideshare provides information, strategies and references on how qualitative data could be presented.
Mapping Experiences with Actor Network TheoryLiza Potts
My presentation from ATTW's annual conference. I talk about how we can better design for experiences if we first understand the context in which we are building products and services. This simple mapping system helps visualize these contexts.
Want more? Check out my book on social media and disaster, filled with more information on how to map networks using actor-network theory http://www.amazon.com/dp/0415817412
Trends in user research methods - WIAD17Reto Laemmler
Lightning talk at World Information Architecture Day 2017 in Zurich. At TestingTime, we gain great insights on what type of user research methods are applied by customers. During 2016 we observed interesting trends on how user research methods changed, especially the combination of qualitative and quantitative research.
As the second part of the lecture on qualitative data analysis we discussed the need to cross-validate the collected insights. In this presentation I show what are the different approaches to data triangulation and how I applied them in my research work.
Components of begg appliance /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian d...Indian dental academy
The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.
Indian dental academy provides dental crown & Bridge,rotary endodontics,fixed orthodontics,
Dental implants courses.for details pls visit www.indiandentalacademy.com ,or call
0091-9248678078
Qualitative Research Methods by Paulino Silva - ECSM2015Paulino Silva
Presentation slides from the Seminar "Qualitative Research Methods" conducted during the European Conference on Social Media 2015 (ECSM2015) in Porto, Portugal.
Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive WorkshopOCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Marie L. Radford. 2016. "Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive Workshop." Presented at the Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Conference, Zadar, Croatia, June 14.
Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive WorkshopLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Marie L. Radford. 2016. "Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive Workshop." Presented at the Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Conference, Zadar, Croatia, June 14.
Trend Spotting Workshop. A practical guide to making sense of large information sources. Workshop run with Gemma Long (QAA) at etc.venues Maple House, Birmingham, 23rd February 2017.
The Process of Conducting Educational ResearchCarlo Luna
The Process of Conducting Educational Research
* Definition of Research and Research Process
* Steps in the Process of Research
* Characteristics of Quantitative and Qualitative Research
* Types of Research Designs
* Skills Needed in Designing and Conducting Research
Studying information behavior: The Many Faces of Digital Visitors and ResidentsLynn Connaway
Connaway, L. S. (2018). Studying information behavior: The Many Faces of Digital Visitors and Residents. Presented at Bar-Ilan University, March 11, 2018, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Studying information behavior: The Many Faces of Digital Visitors and ResidentsOCLC
Connaway, L. S. (2018). Studying information behavior: The Many Faces of Digital Visitors and Residents. Presented at Bar-Ilan University, March 11, 2018, Ramat Gan, Israel.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
4. Qualitative Research Goals
• Meaning: how people see the world
• Context: the world in which people act
• Process: what actions and activities people do
• Reasoning: why people act and behave the way they do
Maxwell, 2005
5. Quantitative vs. Qualitative
• Explanation through numbers
• Objective
• Deductive reasoning
• Predefined variables and
measurement
• Data collection before
analysis
• Cause and effect relationships
• Explanation through words
• Subjective
• Inductive reasoning
• Creativity, extraneous
variables
• Data collection and analysis
intertwined
• Description, meaning
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
6. Quantitative vs. Qualitative
• Explanation through numbers
• Objective
• Deductive reasoning
• Predefined variables and
measurement
• Data collection before
analysis
• Cause and effect relationships
• Explanation through words
• Subjective
• Inductive reasoning
• Creativity, extraneous
variables
• Data collection and analysis
intertwined
• Description, meaning
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
7. Quantitative vs. Qualitative
• Explanation through numbers
• Objective
• Deductive reasoning
• Predefined variables and
measurement
• Data collection before
analysis
• Cause and effect relationships
• Explanation through words
• Subjective
• Inductive reasoning
• Creativity, extraneous
variables
• Data collection and analysis
intertwined
• Description, meaning
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
8. Quantitative vs. Qualitative
• Explanation through numbers
• Objective
• Deductive reasoning
• Predefined variables and
measurement
• Data collection before
analysis
• Cause and effect relationships
• Explanation through words
• Subjective
• Inductive reasoning
• Creativity, extraneous
variables
• Data collection and analysis
intertwined
• Description, meaning
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
9. Quantitative vs. Qualitative
• Explanation through numbers
• Objective
• Deductive reasoning
• Predefined variables and
measurement
• Data collection before
analysis
• Cause and effect relationships
• Explanation through words
• Subjective
• Inductive reasoning
• Creativity, extraneous
variables
• Data collection and analysis
intertwined
• Description, meaning
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
10. Quantitative vs. Qualitative
• Explanation through numbers
• Objective
• Deductive reasoning
• Predefined variables and
measurement
• Data collection before
analysis
• Cause and effect relationships
• Explanation through words
• Subjective
• Inductive reasoning
• Creativity, extraneous
variables
• Data collection and analysis
intertwined
• Description, meaning
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
11. Quantitative vs. Qualitative
• Explanation through numbers
• Objective
• Deductive reasoning
• Predefined variables and
measurement
• Data collection before
analysis
• Cause and effect relationships
• Explanation through words
• Subjective
• Inductive reasoning
• Creativity, extraneous
variables
• Data collection and analysis
intertwined
• Description, meaning
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
12. Getting ‘Good’ Qualitative Results
• Depends on:
• The quality of the data collector
• The quality of the data analyzer
• The quality of the presenter / writer
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
13. Qualitative Data
• Written field notes
• Audio recordings of conversations
• Video recordings of activities
• Diary recordings of activities / thoughts
14. Qualitative Data
• Depth information on:
• thoughts, views, interpretations
• priorities, importance
• processes, practices
• intended effects of actions
• feelings and experiences
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
17. Open Coding
• Treat data as answers to open-ended
questions
• ask data specific questions
• assign codes for answers
• record theoretical notes
Strauss and Corbin, 1998, Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
18. Example: Calendar Routines
• Families were interviewed about their
calendar routines
• What calendars they had
• Where they kept their calendars
• What types of events they recorded
• …
• Written notes
• Audio recordings
Neustaedter, 2007
20. Example: Calendar Routines
• Step 2: list questions / focal points
Where do families keep their calendars?
What uses do they have for their calendars?
Who adds to the calendars?
When do people check the calendars?
…
(you may end up adding to this list as you
go through your data)
22. Example: Calendar Routines
• Step 3: go through data and ask questions
Where do families keep their calendars?
[KI]
Calendar Locations:
[KI] – the kitchen[KI][KI]
23. Example: Calendar Routines
• Step 3: go through data and ask questions
Where do families keep their calendars?
[KI]
Calendar Locations:
[KI] – the kitchen
[CR] – child’s room
[CR]
24. Example: Calendar Routines
• Step 3: go through data and ask questions
Continue for the remaining questions….
[KI]
Calendar Locations:
[KI] – the kitchen
[CR] – child’s room
[CR]
25. Example: Calendar Routines
• The result:
• list of codes
• frequency of each code
• a sense of the importance of each code
• frequency != importance
26. Example 2: Calendar Contents
• Pictures were taken of family calendars
Neustaedter, 2007
27. Example: Calendar Contents
• Step 1: list questions / focal points
What type of events are on the calendar?
Who are the events for?
What other markings are made on the calendar?
…
(you may end up adding to this list as you go
through your data)
28. Example: Calendar Contents
• Step 2: go through data and ask questions
What types of events are on the calendar?
29. Example: Calendar Contents
• Step 2: go through data and ask questions
What types of events are on the calendar?
Types of Events:
[FO] – family outing
[FO]
30. Example: Calendar Contents
• Step 2: go through data and ask questions
What types of events are on the calendar?
Types of Events:
[FO] – family outing
[AN] - anniversary
[FO]
[AN]
31. Example: Calendar Contents
• Step 2: go through data and ask questions
Continue for the remaining questions….
Types of Events:
[FO] – family outing
[AN] - anniversary
[FO]
[AN]
32. Reporting Results
• Find the main themes
• Use quotes / scenarios to represent them
• Include counts for codes (optional)
37. Systematic Coding
• Categories are created ahead of time
• from existing literature
• from previous open coding
• Code the data just like open coding
Ron Wardell, EVDS 617 course notes
39. Affinity Diagramming
• Goal: what are the main themes?
• Write ideas on sticky notes
• Place notes on a large wall / surface
• Group notes hierarchically to see main
themes
Holtzblatt et al., 2005
40. Example: Calendar Field Study
Neustaedter, 2007
• Families were given a digital calendar to
use in their homes
• Thoughts / reactions recorded:
• Weekly interview notes
• Audio recordings from interviews
41. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 1: Affinity Notes
• go through data and write observations down
on post-it notes
• each note contains one idea
42. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 2: Diagram Building
• place all notes on a wall / surface
43. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 3: Diagram Building
• move notes into related columns / piles
44. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 3: Diagram Building
• move notes into related columns / piles
45. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 3: Diagram Building
• move notes into related columns / piles
46. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 3: Diagram Building
• move notes into related columns / piles
47. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 3: Diagram Building
• move notes into related columns / piles
48. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 3: Diagram Building
• move notes into related columns / piles
49. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 3: Diagram Building
• move notes into related columns / piles
50. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 4: Affinity Labels
• write labels describing each group
51. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 4: Affinity Labels
• write labels describing each group
Calendar placement
is a challenge
52. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 4: Affinity Labels
• write labels describing each group
Calendar placement
is a challenge
Interface visuals
affect usage
53. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 4: Affinity Labels
• write labels describing each group
Calendar placement
is a challenge
Interface visuals
affect usage
People check the
calendar when not at
home
54. Example: Calendar Field Study
• Step 5: Further Refine Groupings
• see Holtzblatt et al. 2005
Calendar placement
is a challenge
Interface visuals
affect usage
People check the
calendar when not at
home
56. Validity Threats
• Bias
• researcher’s influence on the study
• e.g., studying one’s own culture
• Reactivity
• researcher's effect on the setting or people
• e.g., people may do things differently
Maxwell, 2005
57. Validity Tests
Maxwell, 2005
• Negative cases
• Triangulation
• Quasi-statistics
• Comparison
• Intensive / long term
• Rich data
• Respondent validation
• Intervention
58. Validity Tests
Maxwell, 2005
• Negative cases
• Triangulation
• Quasi-statistics
• Comparison
• Intensive / long term
• Rich data
• Respondent validation
• Intervention
59. Validity Tests
Maxwell, 2005
• Negative cases
• Triangulation
• Quasi-statistics
• Comparison
• Intensive / long term
• Rich data
• Respondent validation
• Intervention
60. Validity Tests
Maxwell, 2005
• Negative cases
• Triangulation
• Quasi-statistics
• Comparison
• Intensive / long term
• Rich data
• Respondent validation
• Intervention
61. Validity Tests
Maxwell, 2005
• Negative cases
• Triangulation
• Quasi-statistics
• Comparison
• Intensive / long term
• Rich data
• Respondent validation
• Intervention
62. Validity Tests
Maxwell, 2005
• Negative cases
• Triangulation
• Quasi-statistics
• Comparison
• Intensive / long term
• Rich data
• Respondent validation
• Intervention
63. Validity Tests
Maxwell, 2005
• Negative cases
• Triangulation
• Quasi-statistics
• Comparison
• Intensive / long term
• Rich data
• Respondent validation
• Intervention
64. Validity Tests
Maxwell, 2005
• Negative cases
• Triangulation
• Quasi-statistics
• Comparison
• Intensive / long term
• Rich data
• Respondent validation
• Intervention
65. Validity Tests
Maxwell, 2005
• Negative cases
• Triangulation
• Quasi-statistics
• Comparison
• Intensive / long term
• Rich data
• Respondent validation
• Intervention
66. Generalizability
• Internal generalizability
• do findings extend within the group studied?
• External generalizability
• do findings extend outside the group studied?
• Face generalizability
• there is no reason to believe the results don’t
generalize
Maxwell, 2005
70. References
1. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., & Beale, R., (1998) Human Computer Interaction, 2nd ed. Toronto: Prentice-Hall.
- Chapter 11: qualitative methods in general
1. Holtzblatt, K, and Jones, S., (1995) Conducting and Analyzing a Contextual Interview, In Readings in Human-Computer
Interaction: Toward the Year 2000, 2nd ed., R.M. Baecker,et al., Editors, Morgan Kaufman, pp. 241-253.
- conducting and analyzing contextual interviews
1. Holtzblatt, K, Wendell, J., and Wood, S., (2005) Rapid Contextual Design: A How-To Guide to Key Techniques for User-
Centered Design, Morgan Kaufmann.
- Chapter 8: building affinity diagrams
1. Maxwell, J., (2005) Qualitative Research Design, In Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 41.
- Chapter 1: a model for qualitative research design
- Chapter 5: choosing qualitative methods and analysis
- Chapter 6: validity and generalizability
5. Neustaedter, C. 2007. Domestic Awareness and Family Calendars, PhD Dissertation, University of Calgary, Canada.
- example qualitative studies, analysis, and results reporting
6. Sanders, E.B. 1999. From User-Centered to Participatory Design Approaches, In Design and Social Sciences, J. Frascara
(Ed.), Taylor and Francis Books Limited.
- participatory design for idea generation
7. Spradley, J. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Part 2, Step 2: interviewing an informant
- Part 2, Step 5: analyzing ethnographic interviews
• Spradley, J., (1980) Participant Observation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Part 2, Step 2: doing participant observation
- Part 2, Step 3: making an ethnographic record
• Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing
Grounded Theory, SAGE Publications.
- Part 2: coding procedures
Editor's Notes
The goals of qualitative research are to understand:
Meaning
Context
Process
Reasoning
These points are under contention by researchers.
Quantitative research involves explaining a phenomenon based on numerical evidence.
For example, X is faster than Y so X must be better.
Qualitative research involves explaining a phenomenon through words.
For example, using a description of a real world act or process.
Quantitative is objective: it is undistorted by emotion or personal bias; based on observable phenomenon.
Qualitative is subjective: it is influenced by personal opinion, the creativity of the researcher to ask the right questions and see the right actions.
You need to understand what your biases are ahead of time and understand how they will affect the results.
Quantitative relies on deductive reasoning where you will start with a hypothesis or principle and attempt to prove/disprove it.
Qualitative relies on inductive reasoning in which general principles are derived from particular facts or instances. You don’t start with a hypothesis. You start by observing small samples and drawing larger conclusions about populations as a whole from these observations.
Quantitative relies on collecting data first then analysis it to get objective results.
Qualitative relies on collecting data, analyzing it, refining the research method and questions, and then repeating the process.
Quantitative gives you cause and effect relationships.
Qualitative gives you meanings and descriptions of phenomena.
These points are under contention by researchers.
Quantitative research involves explaining a phenomenon based on numerical evidence.
For example, X is faster than Y so X must be better.
Qualitative research involves explaining a phenomenon through words.
For example, using a description of a real world act or process.
Quantitative is objective: it is undistorted by emotion or personal bias; based on observable phenomenon.
Qualitative is subjective: it is influenced by personal opinion, the creativity of the researcher to ask the right questions and see the right actions.
You need to understand what your biases are ahead of time and understand how they will affect the results.
Quantitative relies on deductive reasoning where you will start with a hypothesis or principle and attempt to prove/disprove it.
Qualitative relies on inductive reasoning in which general principles are derived from particular facts or instances. You don’t start with a hypothesis. You start by observing small samples and drawing larger conclusions about populations as a whole from these observations.
Quantitative relies on collecting data first then analysis it to get objective results.
Qualitative relies on collecting data, analyzing it, refining the research method and questions, and then repeating the process.
Quantitative gives you cause and effect relationships.
Qualitative gives you meanings and descriptions of phenomena.
These points are under contention by researchers.
Quantitative research involves explaining a phenomenon based on numerical evidence.
For example, X is faster than Y so X must be better.
Qualitative research involves explaining a phenomenon through words.
For example, using a description of a real world act or process.
Quantitative is objective: it is undistorted by emotion or personal bias; based on observable phenomenon.
Qualitative is subjective: it is influenced by personal opinion, the creativity of the researcher to ask the right questions and see the right actions.
You need to understand what your biases are ahead of time and understand how they will affect the results.
Quantitative relies on deductive reasoning where you will start with a hypothesis or principle and attempt to prove/disprove it.
Qualitative relies on inductive reasoning in which general principles are derived from particular facts or instances. You don’t start with a hypothesis. You start by observing small samples and drawing larger conclusions about populations as a whole from these observations.
Quantitative relies on collecting data first then analysis it to get objective results.
Qualitative relies on collecting data, analyzing it, refining the research method and questions, and then repeating the process.
Quantitative gives you cause and effect relationships.
Qualitative gives you meanings and descriptions of phenomena.
These points are under contention by researchers.
Quantitative research involves explaining a phenomenon based on numerical evidence.
For example, X is faster than Y so X must be better.
Qualitative research involves explaining a phenomenon through words.
For example, using a description of a real world act or process.
Quantitative is objective: it is undistorted by emotion or personal bias; based on observable phenomenon.
Qualitative is subjective: it is influenced by personal opinion, the creativity of the researcher to ask the right questions and see the right actions.
You need to understand what your biases are ahead of time and understand how they will affect the results.
Quantitative relies on deductive reasoning where you will start with a hypothesis or principle and attempt to prove/disprove it.
Qualitative relies on inductive reasoning in which general principles are derived from particular facts or instances. You don’t start with a hypothesis. You start by observing small samples and drawing larger conclusions about populations as a whole from these observations.
Quantitative relies on collecting data first then analysis it to get objective results.
Qualitative relies on collecting data, analyzing it, refining the research method and questions, and then repeating the process.
Quantitative gives you cause and effect relationships.
Qualitative gives you meanings and descriptions of phenomena.
These points are under contention by researchers.
Quantitative research involves explaining a phenomenon based on numerical evidence.
For example, X is faster than Y so X must be better.
Qualitative research involves explaining a phenomenon through words.
For example, using a description of a real world act or process.
Quantitative is objective: it is undistorted by emotion or personal bias; based on observable phenomenon.
Qualitative is subjective: it is influenced by personal opinion, the creativity of the researcher to ask the right questions and see the right actions.
You need to understand what your biases are ahead of time and understand how they will affect the results.
Quantitative relies on deductive reasoning where you will start with a hypothesis or principle and attempt to prove/disprove it.
Qualitative relies on inductive reasoning in which general principles are derived from particular facts or instances. You don’t start with a hypothesis. You start by observing small samples and drawing larger conclusions about populations as a whole from these observations.
Quantitative relies on collecting data first then analysis it to get objective results.
Qualitative relies on collecting data, analyzing it, refining the research method and questions, and then repeating the process.
Quantitative gives you cause and effect relationships.
Qualitative gives you meanings and descriptions of phenomena.
These points are under contention by researchers.
Quantitative research involves explaining a phenomenon based on numerical evidence.
For example, X is faster than Y so X must be better.
Qualitative research involves explaining a phenomenon through words.
For example, using a description of a real world act or process.
Quantitative is objective: it is undistorted by emotion or personal bias; based on observable phenomenon.
Qualitative is subjective: it is influenced by personal opinion, the creativity of the researcher to ask the right questions and see the right actions.
You need to understand what your biases are ahead of time and understand how they will affect the results.
Quantitative relies on deductive reasoning where you will start with a hypothesis or principle and attempt to prove/disprove it.
Qualitative relies on inductive reasoning in which general principles are derived from particular facts or instances. You don’t start with a hypothesis. You start by observing small samples and drawing larger conclusions about populations as a whole from these observations.
Quantitative relies on collecting data first then analysis it to get objective results.
Qualitative relies on collecting data, analyzing it, refining the research method and questions, and then repeating the process.
Quantitative gives you cause and effect relationships.
Qualitative gives you meanings and descriptions of phenomena.
These points are under contention by researchers.
Quantitative research involves explaining a phenomenon based on numerical evidence.
For example, X is faster than Y so X must be better.
Qualitative research involves explaining a phenomenon through words.
For example, using a description of a real world act or process.
Quantitative is objective: it is undistorted by emotion or personal bias; based on observable phenomenon.
Qualitative is subjective: it is influenced by personal opinion, the creativity of the researcher to ask the right questions and see the right actions.
You need to understand what your biases are ahead of time and understand how they will affect the results.
Quantitative relies on deductive reasoning where you will start with a hypothesis or principle and attempt to prove/disprove it.
Qualitative relies on inductive reasoning in which general principles are derived from particular facts or instances. You don’t start with a hypothesis. You start by observing small samples and drawing larger conclusions about populations as a whole from these observations.
Quantitative relies on collecting data first then analysis it to get objective results.
Qualitative relies on collecting data, analyzing it, refining the research method and questions, and then repeating the process.
Quantitative gives you cause and effect relationships.
Qualitative gives you meanings and descriptions of phenomena.
Quality of the data collector: listening skills, interpersonal skills, observational skills
Quality of the data analyzer: interpretation, inference
Quality of the presenter / writer: if the person is able to effectively communicate the phenomenon
Understand the threats that may exist and try to rule them out or understand how they affect the results.
There are several ways to ensure your results are valid.
validity tests:
- intensive, long term endearment -- more data, repeated observation and interviews
- rich data -- full and detailed descriptions
- respondent validation -- ask them if the reportings are correct (though this could be
just as invalid as the original work)
- intervention -- interact with them and see how behavior changes
- searching for negative cases
- triangulation -- collect data from a variety of settings and methods
- quasi-statistics -- e.g., frequency counts
- comparison -- multicase, multisite studies
There are several ways to ensure your results are valid.
validity tests:
- intensive, long term endearment -- more data, repeated observation and interviews
- rich data -- full and detailed descriptions
- respondent validation -- ask them if the reportings are correct (though this could be
just as invalid as the original work)
- intervention -- interact with them and see how behavior changes
- searching for negative cases
- triangulation -- collect data from a variety of settings and methods
- quasi-statistics -- e.g., frequency counts
- comparison -- multicase, multisite studies
There are several ways to ensure your results are valid.
validity tests:
- intensive, long term endearment -- more data, repeated observation and interviews
- rich data -- full and detailed descriptions
- respondent validation -- ask them if the reportings are correct (though this could be
just as invalid as the original work)
- intervention -- interact with them and see how behavior changes
- searching for negative cases
- triangulation -- collect data from a variety of settings and methods
- quasi-statistics -- e.g., frequency counts
- comparison -- multicase, multisite studies
There are several ways to ensure your results are valid.
validity tests:
- intensive, long term endearment -- more data, repeated observation and interviews
- rich data -- full and detailed descriptions
- respondent validation -- ask them if the reportings are correct (though this could be
just as invalid as the original work)
- intervention -- interact with them and see how behavior changes
- searching for negative cases
- triangulation -- collect data from a variety of settings and methods
- quasi-statistics -- e.g., frequency counts
- comparison -- multicase, multisite studies
There are several ways to ensure your results are valid.
validity tests:
- intensive, long term endearment -- more data, repeated observation and interviews
- rich data -- full and detailed descriptions
- respondent validation -- ask them if the reportings are correct (though this could be
just as invalid as the original work)
- intervention -- interact with them and see how behavior changes
- searching for negative cases
- triangulation -- collect data from a variety of settings and methods
- quasi-statistics -- e.g., frequency counts
- comparison -- multicase, multisite studies
There are several ways to ensure your results are valid.
validity tests:
- intensive, long term endearment -- more data, repeated observation and interviews
- rich data -- full and detailed descriptions
- respondent validation -- ask them if the reportings are correct (though this could be
just as invalid as the original work)
- intervention -- interact with them and see how behavior changes
- searching for negative cases
- triangulation -- collect data from a variety of settings and methods
- quasi-statistics -- e.g., frequency counts
- comparison -- multicase, multisite studies
There are several ways to ensure your results are valid.
validity tests:
- intensive, long term endearment -- more data, repeated observation and interviews
- rich data -- full and detailed descriptions
- respondent validation -- ask them if the reportings are correct (though this could be
just as invalid as the original work)
- intervention -- interact with them and see how behavior changes
- searching for negative cases
- triangulation -- collect data from a variety of settings and methods
- quasi-statistics -- e.g., frequency counts
- comparison -- multicase, multisite studies
There are several ways to ensure your results are valid.
validity tests:
- intensive, long term endearment -- more data, repeated observation and interviews
- rich data -- full and detailed descriptions
- respondent validation -- ask them if the reportings are correct (though this could be
just as invalid as the original work)
- intervention -- interact with them and see how behavior changes
- searching for negative cases
- triangulation -- collect data from a variety of settings and methods
- quasi-statistics -- e.g., frequency counts
- comparison -- multicase, multisite studies
There are several ways to ensure your results are valid.
validity tests:
- intensive, long term endearment -- more data, repeated observation and interviews
- rich data -- full and detailed descriptions
- respondent validation -- ask them if the reportings are correct (though this could be
just as invalid as the original work)
- intervention -- interact with them and see how behavior changes
- searching for negative cases
- triangulation -- collect data from a variety of settings and methods
- quasi-statistics -- e.g., frequency counts
- comparison -- multicase, multisite studies
Internal generalizability: you may have studied only a few people within a larger group. Do findings extend to all people in this group?
External generalizability: do findings extend outside this group?
This is typically not the focus as qualitative studies focus on one particular type of group.
It is difficult to get external validity (generalizability) with qualitative research. Instead, you should seek face generalizability -- there is no obvious reason not to believe that the results don't genearlize to the larger population. Use some of the validity tests just described to do this, look for negative cases, etc.