SQC, Tools and Applications Adam Falkenstein December 14 th , 2004
Outline Brief History of Quality Control Deming’s Principles Six Sigma—methodology and tools Balanced Scorecard A Scorecard from Healthcare A Scorecard for the U of M  Morris
Brief History of Quality Control Pre-statistics Chinese hand crafts 11-8th centuries BC Scandinavian shipbuilders Examples from Bible circa 600 BC Greeks building temples India Working with Gold in 300 BC Romans standardization-400BC to 400 AD Guilds and Governments-competition, quality
Pre WWII Walter Shewhart, 1924 Bell Laboratories Shewhart develops and improves methodology for Statistics in industry.  (Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product, 1931) US Military Adopts SQC during WWII Brief History of Quality Control
Post WWII SQC spreads to Europe through industry Japanese Quality Deming Advises Japan in SQC Brief History of Quality Control
Deming’s Principles  . Create Constancy of purpose Adopt a new philosophy Cease dependence on  inspection for quality End Proactive awarding of business on price tag alone-instead minimize total cost Improve every process constantly/forever
Deming’s Principles   . Institute training on the job Adopt and institute Leadership Drive out fear Break down barriers between staff areas Eliminate Slogans, exhortations and targets for workforce Eliminate numerical quotas
Deming’s Principles   . Remove barriers that rob pride of workmanship Institute rigorous programs for education and self Improvement Put everybody in the company to work to accomplish this transformation
Six Sigma What is six sigma? 3 Key Principles DMAIC Statistical Measures Tools 6σ
Term trademark to Motorola Methodology for SQC Six Sigma means-- Products and processes whose range of values that are…acceptable, for whatever is being measured, covers a range of 12 standard deviations (sigma)—6 on each side of the average or nominal value What is Six Sigma? 6σ
Six Sigma Assumptions Normal distribution Nominal shift of 1.5 σ μ  and  σ  are known Defects randomly distributed Parts and process steps independent 6σ
Leadership Commitment Key word “Leader”ship Data Based Decisions Not sound decisions without data Training and Culture change Knowledge and understanding in order for change 3 key Principles of Six Sigma 6σ
DMAIC in Six Sigma 6σ Characterization Monitoring Systems Define Measure Analyze Improve Control Optimization Controlling Systems
DMAIC in Six Sigma 6σ Define Measure Analyze Improve Control What is Important? Set expectations Identify processes to be improved How are we doing? Identify processes that are critical for quality Define defects Establish Goals What is wrong? Explain variables that are likely to cause process variation What needs to be done? Confirm variables that are critical for quality Identify acceptable ranges for key variables How do we guarantee performance? Ensure solution is sustained Statistics!!!
Defects Yield DPO DPMO Process Sigma  Example….Adverse Drug Events Statistical Measures in Six Sigma ………… Sample 1000 admins—20 ADEs …………...980/1000=98.0% ……………20/1000=2.0% ………….DPO*1,000,000=20,000 ….From Scale, 3.55 6σ
Tools in Six Sigma Histogram/Pie Chart Time Series Analysis ANOVA Cause and Effect Analysis Pareto Charts Control Charts All graphs created in MiniTab ® 6σ
Pareto Chart Chart consistencies of most frequent defects Used to locate Major sources of problems Able to use with Count and Categorical Data Example… 6σ
Example Pareto Data 6σ red blue green blue red red red yellow red red green red blue blue green green red red green red red red red red blue red blue blue blue blue blue red blue red red yellow red red yellow red green red green green green red red red red green red green red red blue red blue green red yellow blue blue blue yellow green red red blue blue red red green blue red red red yellow red red red red yellow blue blue green red blue blue green red green blue green red red red red red blue red brown red blue blue red brown green red
Example Pareto Chart 6σ
Used to determine if variation is chance or assignable cause Good for measuring control of variation Control needed before Change More appropriately applied to process rather than product Control Charts 6σ
X-bar: Continuous values measuring product or service attributes X: similar, but subgroups contain one value P: Proportion of units defective C: Count of units defective (equal subgroups needed) U: Rate of defects per unit Types of Control Charts 6σ
Control Charting Sub-grouping—Time, random Sample Mean Sample Standard Error UCL, LCL (usually mean plus and minus 3 times standard error) 6σ
Sample Control Chart Data 6σ .70 22.81 Avg 22 23 21 25 24 22 22 23 22 24 23 22 22 20 X10 20 21 23 26 25 23 16 21 24 26 25 24 21 23 X8 25 23 21 26 24 22 23 23 24 23 22 18 24 23 X9 25 24 23 25 24 26 26 26 25 27 26 24 23 22 X7 24 26 25 25 26 24 26 25 23 25 24 25 26 24 X6 24 23 27 24 21 26 23 22 25 21 24 22 22 28 X5 .66 22.2 21 20 21 20 14 .54 22.5 22 21 20 22 13 .78 22.5 21 18 23 23 12 .83 23.4 21 23 21 18 11 .78 22.9 18 20 23 24 10 .54 23.6 24 21 23 25 9 .93 22.7 23 20 24 24 8 .53 23.2 26 22 22 22 7 .52 23 23 21 20 23 6 .79 23.2 24 19 21 22 5 .69 22.9 18 22 23 22 4 .79 22.5 19 22 23 26 3 .65 22.4 25 20 20 21 2 .80 22.3 22 19 22 20 1 S. E. Mean X4 X3 X2 X1 Batch
Sample Control Chart 22.8+3(.7)~24.9 22.8-3(.7)~20.7 6σ
Balanced Scorecard Purpose Brief Understanding Financial Customer Internal Business Process Learning and Growth Flow Diagram
Purpose of Balanced Scorecard Focus Strategy Communicate Strategy Align company Goals Identify and Align strategic objectives Perform periodic reviews
Financial Perspective Lagging Indicators Usually Long term goals of company Linked to drivers Most companies aim to improve here
Customer Perspective Also lagging indicator Share, retention, acquisition, satisfaction, profitability 3 class attributes Product and service Customer relationships Image and Reputation
Internal-Business-Process Process Quality/Time Identification of Critical Processes Identification of Critical VOC
Learning and Growth Employee Skills Other perspectives depend upon learning and growth Enablers Employees Systems Organizational Alignment Satisfaction, Productivity, Retention
Balanced Scorecard Financial Cusotmer Internal-Business-Processes Learning and Growth
Immanuel St. Joseph-Mayo H.S. Balanced Scorecard in slightly different Context Six Sigma foundation for Strategic Improvement Initiatives Scorecard fundamental for tracking progress Integrates Strategic Aims to Support Balanced Scorecard Methodology
Immanuel St. Joseph-Mayo H.S. Hospital specific Backed by Institutional Data Dashboard Tailored appropriately to meet the needs of Senior Team Ultimate goal to expand Network-wide
 
 
UMM Scorecard A ranking tool to see how UMM matches against other Liberal Arts Colleges Nation-wide Same standards as US News & World Report Looks at past performance in different areas Ranking by percentile in each category Weighted Percentile overall
UMM Scorecard Peer assesment Acceptance rate H.S. Class standing SAT/ACT scores Faculty compensation Faculty with highest possible degree Full time Faculty Student/Faculty ratio Class size, 1-19 Class size, 50+ Graduation Rate Freshman Retention Educational Expense per student Alumni giving rate Graduation rate performance
UMM Scorecard-all LA
 
UMM Scorecard-PLAC
 
Questions?

QM-032-SQC tool application

  • 1.
    SQC, Tools andApplications Adam Falkenstein December 14 th , 2004
  • 2.
    Outline Brief Historyof Quality Control Deming’s Principles Six Sigma—methodology and tools Balanced Scorecard A Scorecard from Healthcare A Scorecard for the U of M Morris
  • 3.
    Brief History ofQuality Control Pre-statistics Chinese hand crafts 11-8th centuries BC Scandinavian shipbuilders Examples from Bible circa 600 BC Greeks building temples India Working with Gold in 300 BC Romans standardization-400BC to 400 AD Guilds and Governments-competition, quality
  • 4.
    Pre WWII WalterShewhart, 1924 Bell Laboratories Shewhart develops and improves methodology for Statistics in industry. (Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product, 1931) US Military Adopts SQC during WWII Brief History of Quality Control
  • 5.
    Post WWII SQCspreads to Europe through industry Japanese Quality Deming Advises Japan in SQC Brief History of Quality Control
  • 6.
    Deming’s Principles . Create Constancy of purpose Adopt a new philosophy Cease dependence on inspection for quality End Proactive awarding of business on price tag alone-instead minimize total cost Improve every process constantly/forever
  • 7.
    Deming’s Principles . Institute training on the job Adopt and institute Leadership Drive out fear Break down barriers between staff areas Eliminate Slogans, exhortations and targets for workforce Eliminate numerical quotas
  • 8.
    Deming’s Principles . Remove barriers that rob pride of workmanship Institute rigorous programs for education and self Improvement Put everybody in the company to work to accomplish this transformation
  • 9.
    Six Sigma Whatis six sigma? 3 Key Principles DMAIC Statistical Measures Tools 6σ
  • 10.
    Term trademark toMotorola Methodology for SQC Six Sigma means-- Products and processes whose range of values that are…acceptable, for whatever is being measured, covers a range of 12 standard deviations (sigma)—6 on each side of the average or nominal value What is Six Sigma? 6σ
  • 11.
    Six Sigma AssumptionsNormal distribution Nominal shift of 1.5 σ μ and σ are known Defects randomly distributed Parts and process steps independent 6σ
  • 12.
    Leadership Commitment Keyword “Leader”ship Data Based Decisions Not sound decisions without data Training and Culture change Knowledge and understanding in order for change 3 key Principles of Six Sigma 6σ
  • 13.
    DMAIC in SixSigma 6σ Characterization Monitoring Systems Define Measure Analyze Improve Control Optimization Controlling Systems
  • 14.
    DMAIC in SixSigma 6σ Define Measure Analyze Improve Control What is Important? Set expectations Identify processes to be improved How are we doing? Identify processes that are critical for quality Define defects Establish Goals What is wrong? Explain variables that are likely to cause process variation What needs to be done? Confirm variables that are critical for quality Identify acceptable ranges for key variables How do we guarantee performance? Ensure solution is sustained Statistics!!!
  • 15.
    Defects Yield DPODPMO Process Sigma Example….Adverse Drug Events Statistical Measures in Six Sigma ………… Sample 1000 admins—20 ADEs …………...980/1000=98.0% ……………20/1000=2.0% ………….DPO*1,000,000=20,000 ….From Scale, 3.55 6σ
  • 16.
    Tools in SixSigma Histogram/Pie Chart Time Series Analysis ANOVA Cause and Effect Analysis Pareto Charts Control Charts All graphs created in MiniTab ® 6σ
  • 17.
    Pareto Chart Chartconsistencies of most frequent defects Used to locate Major sources of problems Able to use with Count and Categorical Data Example… 6σ
  • 18.
    Example Pareto Data6σ red blue green blue red red red yellow red red green red blue blue green green red red green red red red red red blue red blue blue blue blue blue red blue red red yellow red red yellow red green red green green green red red red red green red green red red blue red blue green red yellow blue blue blue yellow green red red blue blue red red green blue red red red yellow red red red red yellow blue blue green red blue blue green red green blue green red red red red red blue red brown red blue blue red brown green red
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Used to determineif variation is chance or assignable cause Good for measuring control of variation Control needed before Change More appropriately applied to process rather than product Control Charts 6σ
  • 21.
    X-bar: Continuous valuesmeasuring product or service attributes X: similar, but subgroups contain one value P: Proportion of units defective C: Count of units defective (equal subgroups needed) U: Rate of defects per unit Types of Control Charts 6σ
  • 22.
    Control Charting Sub-grouping—Time,random Sample Mean Sample Standard Error UCL, LCL (usually mean plus and minus 3 times standard error) 6σ
  • 23.
    Sample Control ChartData 6σ .70 22.81 Avg 22 23 21 25 24 22 22 23 22 24 23 22 22 20 X10 20 21 23 26 25 23 16 21 24 26 25 24 21 23 X8 25 23 21 26 24 22 23 23 24 23 22 18 24 23 X9 25 24 23 25 24 26 26 26 25 27 26 24 23 22 X7 24 26 25 25 26 24 26 25 23 25 24 25 26 24 X6 24 23 27 24 21 26 23 22 25 21 24 22 22 28 X5 .66 22.2 21 20 21 20 14 .54 22.5 22 21 20 22 13 .78 22.5 21 18 23 23 12 .83 23.4 21 23 21 18 11 .78 22.9 18 20 23 24 10 .54 23.6 24 21 23 25 9 .93 22.7 23 20 24 24 8 .53 23.2 26 22 22 22 7 .52 23 23 21 20 23 6 .79 23.2 24 19 21 22 5 .69 22.9 18 22 23 22 4 .79 22.5 19 22 23 26 3 .65 22.4 25 20 20 21 2 .80 22.3 22 19 22 20 1 S. E. Mean X4 X3 X2 X1 Batch
  • 24.
    Sample Control Chart22.8+3(.7)~24.9 22.8-3(.7)~20.7 6σ
  • 25.
    Balanced Scorecard PurposeBrief Understanding Financial Customer Internal Business Process Learning and Growth Flow Diagram
  • 26.
    Purpose of BalancedScorecard Focus Strategy Communicate Strategy Align company Goals Identify and Align strategic objectives Perform periodic reviews
  • 27.
    Financial Perspective LaggingIndicators Usually Long term goals of company Linked to drivers Most companies aim to improve here
  • 28.
    Customer Perspective Alsolagging indicator Share, retention, acquisition, satisfaction, profitability 3 class attributes Product and service Customer relationships Image and Reputation
  • 29.
    Internal-Business-Process Process Quality/TimeIdentification of Critical Processes Identification of Critical VOC
  • 30.
    Learning and GrowthEmployee Skills Other perspectives depend upon learning and growth Enablers Employees Systems Organizational Alignment Satisfaction, Productivity, Retention
  • 31.
    Balanced Scorecard FinancialCusotmer Internal-Business-Processes Learning and Growth
  • 32.
    Immanuel St. Joseph-MayoH.S. Balanced Scorecard in slightly different Context Six Sigma foundation for Strategic Improvement Initiatives Scorecard fundamental for tracking progress Integrates Strategic Aims to Support Balanced Scorecard Methodology
  • 33.
    Immanuel St. Joseph-MayoH.S. Hospital specific Backed by Institutional Data Dashboard Tailored appropriately to meet the needs of Senior Team Ultimate goal to expand Network-wide
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
    UMM Scorecard Aranking tool to see how UMM matches against other Liberal Arts Colleges Nation-wide Same standards as US News & World Report Looks at past performance in different areas Ranking by percentile in each category Weighted Percentile overall
  • 37.
    UMM Scorecard Peerassesment Acceptance rate H.S. Class standing SAT/ACT scores Faculty compensation Faculty with highest possible degree Full time Faculty Student/Faculty ratio Class size, 1-19 Class size, 50+ Graduation Rate Freshman Retention Educational Expense per student Alumni giving rate Graduation rate performance
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.