This document provides an overview of methods for calculating reservoir fluid properties, including crude oil and water properties. It discusses calculating the total formation volume factor (Bt) using correlations like Standing's and Glaso's. It also covers calculating crude oil viscosity, including dead-oil viscosity using Beal's correlation, saturated oil viscosity using Chew-Connally, and undersaturated oil viscosity using Vasquez-Beggs. The document provides equations and discusses experimental data ranges for various fluid property correlations.

1. Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.)

2. 1. Crude Oil Properties:
A. Formation volume factor for P=<Pb (Bo)
B. Isothermal compressibility coefficient (Co)
C. Formation volume factor for P>Pb (Bo)
D. Density

3. 1. Crude Oil Properties:
A. Total formation volume factor (Bt)
B. Viscosity (μo)
a. Dead-Oil Viscosity
b. Saturated(bubble-point)-Oil Viscosity
c. Undersaturated-Oil Viscosity
C. Surface Tension (σ)
2. Water Properties
A. Water Formation Volume Factor (Bw)
B. water viscosity (μw)
C. Gas Solubility in Water (Rsw)
D. Water Isothermal Compressibility (Cw)

5. Total Formation Volume Factor
To describe the P-V relationship of hydrocarbon
systems below their bubble-point pressure,
it is convenient to express this relationship
in terms of the total formation volume factor
as a function of pressure.
the total formation volume factor (Bt)
defines the total volume of a system
regardless of the number of phases present.
is defined as the ratio of the total volume of the
hydrocarbon mixture (i.e., oil and gas, if present),
at the prevailing pressure and temperature
per unit volume of the stock-tank oil.
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 5

6. Two-Phase Formation Volume Factor
expression
Because naturally occurring hydrocarbon systems
usually exist in either one or two phases, the term
“two-phase formation volume factor” has become
synonymous with the total formation volume.
Mathematically, Bt is defined by :
above the Pb; no free gas exists
the expression is reduced to the equation that describes
the oil formation volume factor, Bo, that is:
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 6

7. Bt and Bo vs. Pressure
A typical plot of Bt
as a function of
pressure for an
undersaturated
crude oil.
at pressures below
the Pb, the
difference in the
values of the two
oil properties
represents
the volume of the
evolved solution
gas as measured at
system conditions
per stock-tank
barrel of oil.
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 7

8. Volume of the Free Gas at P and T
Consider a crude oil sample placed in a PVT cell at its
bubble-point pressure, Pb, and reservoir temperature.
Assume that the volume of the oil sample is sufficient
to yield one stock-tank barrel of oil at standard conditions.
Let Rsb represent the gas solubility at Pb.
If the cell pressure is lowered to p,
a portion of the solution gas is evolved and
occupies a certain volume of the PVT cell.
Let Rs and Bo represent the corresponding
gas solubility and oil formation volume factor at p.
the term (Rsb – Rs) represents
the volume of the free gas
as measured in scf per stock-tank barrel of oil.
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 8

9. Bt Calculation
The volume of
the free gas
at the cell conditions is
(Vg)p,T [bbl of gas/STB of
oil] and Bg [bbl/scf]
The volume of
the remaining oil
at the cell condition is
from the definition
There are several
correlations that
can be used to estimate
the two phase formation
volume factor
when the experimental
data are not available;
three of these methods
are:
Standing’s correlations
Glaso’s method
Marhoun’s correlation
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 9

10. Bt: Standing’s and
Whitson-Brule Correlation
for predicting Bt Standing (1947)
used a total of 387 experimental data points
to develop a graphical correlation
with a reported average error of 5%
In developing his graphical correlation, Standing
used a combined correlating parameter by:
Whitson and Brule (2000) expressed Standing’s
graphical correlation by:
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 10

11. Bt: Glaso’s Correlation
Glaso (1980) developed
a generalized correlation for estimating Bt
The experimental data on 45 crude oil samples
from the North Sea.
a standard deviation of 6.54% for Bt correlation
Glaso modified Standing’s correlating parameter A* and
used a regression analysis model
with the exponent C given by:
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 11

12. Bt: Marhoun’s Correlation
Marhoun (1988)
Based on 1,556 experimentally determined Bt
used a nonlinear multiple-regression model
to develop a mathematical expression for Bt.
an average absolute error of 4.11%
with a standard deviation of 4.94% for the correlation
The empirical equation is:
with the correlating parameter F given by:
a = 0.644516, b = −1.079340,
c = 0.724874, d = 2.006210, e = − 0.761910
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 12

14. Crude Oil Viscosity
Crude oil viscosity is an important physical property
that controls and influences
the flow of oil through porous media and pipes.
The oil viscosity
in general, is defined as
the internal resistance of the fluid to flow.
is a strong function of the T, P, oil gravity, γg, and Rs.
Whenever possible, should be determined
by laboratory measurements at reservoir T and P.
The viscosity is usually reported in standard PVT analyses.
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 14

15. Crude Oil Viscosity Calculation
In absence of laboratory data, correlations, which
usually vary in complexity and accuracy depending
upon the available data on the crude oil, may used.
According to the pressure, the viscosity of crude
oils can be classified into three categories:
Dead-Oil Viscosity:
the viscosity of crude oil at atmospheric pressure
(no gas in solution) and system temperature.
Saturated(bubble-point)-Oil Viscosity:
the viscosity of the crude oil at the Pb and reservoir T
Undersaturated-Oil Viscosity:
the viscosity of the crude oil at a P above the Pb and reservoir T
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 15

16. Estimation of the Oil Viscosity
Estimation of the oil viscosity at
P equal to or below the Pb is a two-step procedure:
Step 1. Calculate the viscosity of the oil without
dissolved gas (dead oil), μob, at the reservoir T
Step 2. Adjust the dead-oil viscosity to account for the
effect of the gas solubility at the pressure of interest.
At pressures greater than the Pb of the crude oil,
another adjustment step, i.e. Step 3, should be made
to the bubble-point oil viscosity, μob, to account for
the compression and
the degree of under-saturation in the reservoir.
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 16

17. Methods of Calculating Viscosity of
the Dead Oil
Several empirical methods are proposed
to estimate the viscosity of the dead oil, including:
Beal’s correlation
The Beggs-Robinson correlation
Glaso’s correlation
Sutton and Farshad (1986) concluded that
Glaso’s correlation showed the best accuracy
of the three correlations.
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 17

18. μod: Beal’s Correlation
Beal (1946) graphical correlation
for determining the viscosity of the dead oil
From a total of 753 values
for dead-oil viscosity at and above 100°F,
as a function of T and the API gravity of the crude
Standing (1981) expressed the proposed graphical
correlation in a mathematical relationship as follows:
μod = viscosity of the dead oil as measured
at 14.7 psia and reservoir temperature, cp
T = temperature, °R
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 18

19. μod: The Beggs-Robinson Correlation
Beggs and Robinson (1975)
originated from analyzing 460 dead-oil viscosity
measurements.
An average error of −0.64% with a standard deviation of
13.53% was reported for the correlation when tested
against the data used for its development.
Sutton and Farshad (1980) reported an error of 114.3%
when the correlation was tested against 93 cases from
the literature.
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 19

20. μod: Glaso’s Correlation
Glaso (1980) proposed a generalized mathematical
relationship for computing the dead-oil viscosity.
from experimental measurements on 26 crude oil
samples
The above expression can be used
within the range of 50–300°F for the system
temperature and 20–48° for the API gravity of the crude.
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 20

23. Methods of Calculating
the Saturated Oil Viscosity
Several empirical methods are proposed to
estimate the viscosity of the saturated oil,
including:
The Chew-Connally correlation
The Beggs-Robinson correlation
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 23

24. μob: The Chew-Connally correlation
Chew and Connally (1959) presented a graphical correlation
to adjust the dead-oil viscosity according to Rs at saturation
pressure. (from 457 crude oil samples)
Standing (1977) expressed the correlation:
μob = viscosity of the oil at Pb, cp
μod = viscosity of the dead oil at 14.7 psia and reservoir T, cp
The experimental data used by Chew and Connally to
develop their correlation encompassed the following ranges
of values for the independent variables:
Pressure, psia: 132–5,645, Temperature, °F: 72–292
Rs , scf/STB: 51–3,544, Dead oil viscosity, cp: 0.377–50
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 24

25. μob: The Beggs-Robinson correlation
Beggs and Robinson (1975) empirical correlation
From 2,073 saturated oil viscosity measurements
accuracy of −1.83% with a standard deviation of 27.25%.
The ranges of the data used
to develop Beggs and Robinson’s equation are:
Pressure, psia: 132–5,265, Temperature, °F: 70–295
API gravity: 16–58, Gas solubility, scf/STB: 20–2,070
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 25

26. Method of Calculating
the Viscosity of the Undersaturated Oil
Oil viscosity at pressures above the bubble point is
estimated by first calculating the oil viscosity at its
Pb and adjusting the bubble-point viscosity to
higher pressures.
The Vasquez-Beggs (1980) Correlation
From a total of 3,593 data points,
The average error of the viscosity correlation is −7.54%
The data used have the following ranges:
• P, psia: 141–9,151, Rs, scf/STB: 9.3–2,199,
• Viscosity, cp: 0.117–148, γg: 0.511–1.351, API : 15.3–59.5
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 26

28. Surface/Interfacial Tension
The surface tension is defined as
the force exerted on the boundary layer between a
liquid phase and a vapor phase per unit length.
This force is caused by differences between the molecular
forces in the vapor phase and those in the liquid phase, and
also by the imbalance of these forces at the interface.
The surface tension can be measured in the
laboratory and is unusually expressed in dynes per
centimeter.
The surface tension is an important property in
reservoir engineering calculations and
designing enhanced oil recovery projects.
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 28

29. Surface Tension Correlation for
Pure Liquid
Sugden (1924) suggested a relationship that
correlates
the surface tension of a pure liquid
in equilibrium with its own vapor.
The correlating parameters are
molecular weight M of the pure component,
the densities of both phases, and
a newly introduced temperature independent parameter
Pch (parachor).
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 29

30. Parachor Parameter
The parachor
is a dimensionless constant
characteristic of a pure
compound and
is calculated by imposing
experimentally measured
surface tension and density
data on the Equation and
solving for Pch.
The Parachor values for a
selected number of pure
compounds are given in
the Table as reported by
Weinaug and Katz (1943).
Fanchi’s linear equation
is only valid for components
heavier than methane.
(Pch) i = 69.9 + 2.3 Mi
Mi = molecular weight of
component i
(Pch)i =
parachor of component i
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 30

31. Surface Tension Correlation for
Complex Hc Mixtures
For a complex hydrocarbon mixture, Katz et al.
(1943)
employed the Sugden correlation for mixtures by
introducing the compositions of the two phases into the
Equation.
Mo & Mg = apparent molecular weight of the oil & gas phases,
xi and yi = mole fraction of component i in the oil & gas phases,
n = total number of components in the system,
ρo & ρg = density of the oil and gas phase, lb/ft3
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 31

33. Water Formation Volume Factor
The water formation volume factor can be
calculated by the following mathematical
expression:
Where the coefficients A1 − A3 are: (T in °R)
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 33

34. μw: Meehan
Meehan (1980) proposed a water viscosity correlation
that accounts for both the effects of P and salinity:
μwT = brine viscosity at 14.7 psi & reservoir temperature T, cp
ws = weight percent of salt in brine, T = temperature in °R
The effect of pressure “p” on the brine viscosity
can be estimated from:
μw = viscosity of the brine at pressure and temperature
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 34

35. μw: Brill and Beggs
Brill and Beggs (1978)
presented a simpler equation,
which considers only temperature effects:
T is in °F and
μw is in cP
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 35

36. Gas Solubility in Water
The following correlation can be used to determine
the gas solubility in water:
The temperature T is expressed in °F
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 36

37. Water Isothermal Compressibility
Brill and Beggs (1978) proposed
the following equation for estimating
water isothermal compressibility,
ignoring the corrections for
dissolved gas and solids:
Spring14 H. AlamiNia Reservoir Fluid Properties Course (3rd Ed.) 37

38. 1. Ahmed, T. (2010). Reservoir engineering
handbook (Gulf Professional Publishing).
Chapter 2

39. 1. Laboratory Analysis
2. Laboratory Experiments
A. Constant-Composition Expansion
a. Purposes of Constant-Composition Expansion