This document discusses various plagiarism detection software tools, including Turnitin, Urkund, and other open source options. It provides brief overviews of 15 popular plagiarism checking tools, focusing on their key features. The tools discussed can check documents for duplicated or copied content, often scanning billions of web pages. They generate originality reports and identify sources of non-original content to varying degrees of precision and language support. Many are available for free or at low costs.
This document discusses various ethical issues in scientific research, including intellectual honesty, research integrity, scientific misconduct such as falsification and plagiarism. It addresses principles like duty to society, informed consent, and protecting research participants. Forms of problematic publishing are defined, like duplicate/overlapping publications and "salami slicing" research. Selective reporting or misrepresenting data to bias results undermines reproducibility. Upholding integrity requires monitoring at the individual researcher, work group and institutional levels.
The document discusses several key topics in philosophy including ethics, moral philosophy, and the nature of moral judgements. It can be summarized as follows:
1. Ethics (or moral philosophy) is the branch of philosophy concerned with defining right and wrong conduct. It examines moral principles and rules that guide people's decisions about what is right or wrong.
2. Moral philosophy refers to the specific principles or rules that people use to make judgements about the morality of actions.
3. Moral judgements evaluate actions as right or wrong by comparing them to a moral standard. They are normative and involve applying standards to actions, rather than just describing facts.
COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS in Research examples from abroadtp jayamohan
The document discusses several topics related to research misconduct allegations and whistleblowing. It provides guidance for complainants on carefully preparing allegations, protections for complainants, and reporting allegations to the appropriate institutional official. It also discusses cases where whistleblowers uncovered misconduct through diligent analysis of data, but faced resistance, and a case where a complainant was found to have defamed and invaded the privacy of the researcher through improper public disclosure of unproven allegations.
Research Ethics and Integrity: How COPE can helpC0pe
COPE assists journals and publishers with publication ethics issues. It describes 10 core practices for maintaining integrity, including policies on authorship, misconduct allegations, plagiarism, conflicts of interest, and complaints. COPE has over 40 council members from various countries and disciplines. It provides resources like guidelines, flowcharts and training to help journals uphold ethical standards. COPE also engages with China on these issues, through seminars, Chinese language materials and responding to the country's new research regulations.
This document discusses redundant publication in research. It defines redundant publication as publishing the same or similar research findings in multiple papers without proper attribution. There are three main types: duplicate publication, salami slicing, and overlapping publications. Redundant publication undermines research integrity and credibility. It can damage researchers' reputations and lead to retractions or penalties. The document provides guidelines from organizations like COPE and ICMJE for ethical publishing practices to avoid redundant publication.
The document discusses publication ethics, including defining authorship, avoiding plagiarism and fabrication, managing conflicts of interest, and addressing misconduct. It introduces guidelines from organizations like COPE and WAME that provide best practices for publication ethics. Adhering to ethical standards is important to ensure high-quality scientific research and public trust in findings. Journals have processes to identify and handle cases of unethical behavior.
Redundant, Duplicate and Repetitive publications are the most important concerns in the scientific research/literature writing. The occurrence of redundancy affects the concepts of science/literature and carries with it sanctions of consequences. To define this issue is much challenging because of the many varieties in which one can slice, reformat, or reproduce material from an already published study. This issue also goes beyond the duplication of a single study because it might possible that the same or similar data can be published in the early, middle, and later stages of an on-going study. This may have a damaging impact on the scientific study/literature base. Similar to slicing a cake, there are so many ways of representing a study or a set of data/information. We can slice a cake into different shapes like squares, triangles, rounds, or layers. Which of these might be the best way to slice a cake? Unfortunately, this may be the wrong question. The point is that the cake that is being referred to, the data/ information set or the study/findings, should not be sliced at all. Instead, the study should be presented as a whole to the readership to ensure the integrity of science/technology because of the impact that may have on patients who will be affected by the information contained in the literature/findings. Redundant, duplicate, or repetitive publications occur when there is representation of two or more studies, data sets, or publications in either electronic or print media. The publications can overlap partially or completely, such that a similar portion, major component(s), or complete representation of a previously/simultaneous ly or future published study is duplicated.
SALAMI SLICING: The slicing of research publication that would form one meaningful paper into several different papers is known as salami publication or salami slicing. Unlike duplicate publication, which involves reporting the exact same data in two or more publications, salami slicing involves breaking up or segmenting a large study into two or more publications. These segments are called slices of a study. As a general rule, as long as the slices of a broken-up study share the same hypotheses, population, and methods, this is not acceptable in general practice. The same slice should never be published more than once at all. According to the United States Office of Research Integrity (USORI), salami slicing can result in a distortion of the literature/findings by leading unsuspecting readers to believe that data presented in each salami slice (journal article) is derived from a different subject sample/source. Somehow this practice not only skews the scientific database but it creates repetition to waste reader's time as well as the time of editors and peer reviewers, who must also handle each paper separately.
This document discusses various ethical issues in scientific research, including intellectual honesty, research integrity, scientific misconduct such as falsification and plagiarism. It addresses principles like duty to society, informed consent, and protecting research participants. Forms of problematic publishing are defined, like duplicate/overlapping publications and "salami slicing" research. Selective reporting or misrepresenting data to bias results undermines reproducibility. Upholding integrity requires monitoring at the individual researcher, work group and institutional levels.
The document discusses several key topics in philosophy including ethics, moral philosophy, and the nature of moral judgements. It can be summarized as follows:
1. Ethics (or moral philosophy) is the branch of philosophy concerned with defining right and wrong conduct. It examines moral principles and rules that guide people's decisions about what is right or wrong.
2. Moral philosophy refers to the specific principles or rules that people use to make judgements about the morality of actions.
3. Moral judgements evaluate actions as right or wrong by comparing them to a moral standard. They are normative and involve applying standards to actions, rather than just describing facts.
COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS in Research examples from abroadtp jayamohan
The document discusses several topics related to research misconduct allegations and whistleblowing. It provides guidance for complainants on carefully preparing allegations, protections for complainants, and reporting allegations to the appropriate institutional official. It also discusses cases where whistleblowers uncovered misconduct through diligent analysis of data, but faced resistance, and a case where a complainant was found to have defamed and invaded the privacy of the researcher through improper public disclosure of unproven allegations.
Research Ethics and Integrity: How COPE can helpC0pe
COPE assists journals and publishers with publication ethics issues. It describes 10 core practices for maintaining integrity, including policies on authorship, misconduct allegations, plagiarism, conflicts of interest, and complaints. COPE has over 40 council members from various countries and disciplines. It provides resources like guidelines, flowcharts and training to help journals uphold ethical standards. COPE also engages with China on these issues, through seminars, Chinese language materials and responding to the country's new research regulations.
This document discusses redundant publication in research. It defines redundant publication as publishing the same or similar research findings in multiple papers without proper attribution. There are three main types: duplicate publication, salami slicing, and overlapping publications. Redundant publication undermines research integrity and credibility. It can damage researchers' reputations and lead to retractions or penalties. The document provides guidelines from organizations like COPE and ICMJE for ethical publishing practices to avoid redundant publication.
The document discusses publication ethics, including defining authorship, avoiding plagiarism and fabrication, managing conflicts of interest, and addressing misconduct. It introduces guidelines from organizations like COPE and WAME that provide best practices for publication ethics. Adhering to ethical standards is important to ensure high-quality scientific research and public trust in findings. Journals have processes to identify and handle cases of unethical behavior.
Redundant, Duplicate and Repetitive publications are the most important concerns in the scientific research/literature writing. The occurrence of redundancy affects the concepts of science/literature and carries with it sanctions of consequences. To define this issue is much challenging because of the many varieties in which one can slice, reformat, or reproduce material from an already published study. This issue also goes beyond the duplication of a single study because it might possible that the same or similar data can be published in the early, middle, and later stages of an on-going study. This may have a damaging impact on the scientific study/literature base. Similar to slicing a cake, there are so many ways of representing a study or a set of data/information. We can slice a cake into different shapes like squares, triangles, rounds, or layers. Which of these might be the best way to slice a cake? Unfortunately, this may be the wrong question. The point is that the cake that is being referred to, the data/ information set or the study/findings, should not be sliced at all. Instead, the study should be presented as a whole to the readership to ensure the integrity of science/technology because of the impact that may have on patients who will be affected by the information contained in the literature/findings. Redundant, duplicate, or repetitive publications occur when there is representation of two or more studies, data sets, or publications in either electronic or print media. The publications can overlap partially or completely, such that a similar portion, major component(s), or complete representation of a previously/simultaneous ly or future published study is duplicated.
SALAMI SLICING: The slicing of research publication that would form one meaningful paper into several different papers is known as salami publication or salami slicing. Unlike duplicate publication, which involves reporting the exact same data in two or more publications, salami slicing involves breaking up or segmenting a large study into two or more publications. These segments are called slices of a study. As a general rule, as long as the slices of a broken-up study share the same hypotheses, population, and methods, this is not acceptable in general practice. The same slice should never be published more than once at all. According to the United States Office of Research Integrity (USORI), salami slicing can result in a distortion of the literature/findings by leading unsuspecting readers to believe that data presented in each salami slice (journal article) is derived from a different subject sample/source. Somehow this practice not only skews the scientific database but it creates repetition to waste reader's time as well as the time of editors and peer reviewers, who must also handle each paper separately.
The document discusses various citation databases and research metrics used to evaluate scholarly publications and researchers. It describes major citation databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar that compile citations from bibliographies. It also explains common research metrics like the Impact Factor, h-index, g-index, i10 Index, Cite Score, SJR, and SNIP used to measure the influence and impact of publications and researchers. These metrics are calculated based on factors like the number of citations a publication or researcher receives.
In academia, the pressure to publish is high and the competition intense. This can lead authors to follow unethical publication practices, such as salami slicing, duplicate publication, and simultaneous submission. This slide deck explains these malpractices and shares tips on how authors can avoid them.
I explain plainly what is salami silcing, a practice of fragmenting single research into as many publications as possible. Salami publishing and hazards
Open Access (OA) is a system provide access to knowledge resources with free of cost and other restrictions. This PPT answer to the questions what, why, types, benefits etc. and also describes the creative commons licensing, concept of predatory journals, open access journals, and Sharpa RoMeO.
This document provides information about indexing databases and citation databases. It defines a database as a collection of organized information that can be easily accessed and updated. Indexing databases are described as optimizing database performance by minimizing disk accesses during queries through the use of indexes. The document outlines different types of indexing, including clustered, non-clustered, and multi-level indexing. It then defines citation databases as collections of referenced academic works that can be used to evaluate publications by counting citations. The benefits of using citation databases over general search engines are discussed.
The document discusses author level metrics and how they are used to measure the impact of individual authors. It defines author level metrics as citation metrics that measure the bibliometric impact of individual researchers. It also discusses different types of author level metrics, including article-level metrics, journal-level metrics, h-index, i10-index, g-index, and altmetrics. Finally, it discusses tools that can be used to measure author metrics, such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and Publish or Perish.
The document discusses publication misconduct, complaints, and appeals. It defines publication misconduct and explains why it is a problem. The various forms of misconduct are identified such as plagiarism, data fabrication, and authorship issues. Methods for identifying and preventing misconduct like utilizing plagiarism detection software and transparent reporting are presented. The process for publication complaints is outlined including how complaints can arise and the steps in the complaint process. Publication appeals are defined and the steps in the appeal process like submitting the appeal and editorial review are described. Finally, the importance of uniform publication ethics standards for all peer-reviewed journals is emphasized.
Rmc0001 research publications & ethics - module 3 (5)KURMAIAHA20PHD1086
This document discusses publication ethics and responsible research practices. It provides definitions and guidelines around topics like plagiarism, authorship, peer review, and conflicts of interest. It also describes organizations that establish standards and best practices for publication, such as the Committee on Publication Ethics and the World Association of Medical Editors. Finally, it discusses issues like misconduct, causes of unethical behavior, and predatory publishers.
Ethical research and publication practices are essential for honest scholarly and scientific research. Most journals today are keenly aware of this: they publish policies on these issues and expect authors to “be aware of, and comply with, best practice in publication ethics”.This article discusses two widespread and related publishing practices that are considered unethical—duplicate publication and simultaneous submission. It draws on definitive international publication ethics guidelines.
This document discusses publication ethics and outlines guidelines for ethical publishing. It begins by defining publication and the key parties involved - authors, editors, peer reviewers, and publishers. Authors should contribute significantly to the work and properly attribute contributions from others. Unethical practices include guest and gift authorships, plagiarism, and research fraud through fabrication or falsification of data. Conflicts of interest should be disclosed. Predatory journals are identified as having questionable standards and practices aimed at profit rather than quality. UGC works to identify and remove predatory journals from their listings to help researchers identify legitimate publication options. Overall the document provides guidance on ethical authorship, reviewing, editing and publishing of research.
Violation of publication ethics can take several forms, including data manipulation, duplicate publication, simultaneous submission, plagiarism, and salami slicing. Upholding publication ethics is important to establish the integrity and credibility of scholarly research. It is the responsibility of authors to avoid fabricating or manipulating data, plagiarizing, submitting manuscripts to multiple journals simultaneously, or including guest authors who did not meaningfully contribute. Organizations like COPE and ICMJE provide guidelines to help authors, editors, and reviewers maintain high standards of ethical publication practices.
Sherpa provides two tools - SHERPA/RoMEO and SHERPA/FACT - to help researchers comply with open access mandates from their funders. SHERPA/RoMEO allows users to search publisher and journal policies on copyright and self-archiving. SHERPA/FACT combines RoMEO and JULIET data to indicate a journal's open access compliance based on the user's selected funder and publication stage. Both tools aim to help unlock the potential of research by facilitating open access.
II Ethics with respect to Science & Research.pptPgtOnLine
This document discusses ethics with respect to science and research. It defines ethics and explains that ethics deals with judgements about human conduct and what is considered right or wrong behavior. The document then discusses research ethics and explains that what is considered acceptable or unacceptable ways of conducting research can vary in different contexts. Finally, it outlines several key principles of ethics in research, including duty to society, beneficence, informed consent, integrity, and protecting privacy and confidentiality of research participants.
This presentation discusses the importance of publication ethics. It defines ethics as dealing with moral principles, and publication ethics as ensuring high-quality scientific publications, public trust in findings, and proper attribution of ideas. It discusses the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which was established in 1997 to discuss publication ethics issues and advise editors. The importance of publication ethics is that it promotes objective research, supports collaboration, ensures accountability, and builds public trust in research findings. Research and publication ethics are closely connected, as published work enters the public domain and must ensure scientific progress, protect life, promote ethical behavior, and support researchers' reputations.
Publication misconduct refers to unethical behavior in publishing, such as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship, and duplicate or overlapping publications. It undermines the integrity of research. Reasons for misconduct include career pressures, lack of training, and inadequate supervision. Consequences include losing one's career and destroying public trust in researchers. Key types of misconduct are fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship, duplicate submission, overlapping publication, and salami publishing. Retractions can help make misconduct visible but have limitations as they may not provide full details or be widely disseminated. More transparency is needed regarding misconduct to help prevent and address it.
This document discusses various publication ethics issues including duplicate publication, authorship, scientific misconduct, and conflicts of interest. It provides definitions and examples of these issues, noting that journals exist to enhance the scientific database but also other interests like profits. The document cites a study that found around 0.04% of papers involved plagiarism and 1.35% involved duplicate publication. It discusses best practices for authorship including determining order upfront and documenting responsibilities. Conflicts of interest can mislead readers and include financial, personal, political or academic interests. The Committee on Publication Ethics was founded to address integrity concerns in medical journal publishing.
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSaptarshi Ghosh
The document discusses various issues related to scientific misconduct including fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. It notes that these practices undermine scientific progress and can cause harm. It defines fabrication as making up data/results and falsification as improperly changing or misreporting data. Plagiarism involves using ideas or words without proper attribution. Maintaining integrity in research is important for objective and reliable science.
This document discusses various types of academic misconduct, including fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. It defines fabrication as the construction of data that was never actually observed or measured. Falsification is changing or omitting results to support a claim. Plagiarism involves using others' work and ideas without proper citation. The document provides several examples of academic misconduct, such as conducting research on humans without informed consent, ghost authorship, and image manipulation. It emphasizes the importance of ethical research practices.
This document outlines the University of Nairobi's policies on plagiarism and use of the Turnitin software for plagiarism checking. It defines plagiarism and explains the university's plagiarism policy, including forms of plagiarism, penalties, and a 15% threshold for similarity reports from Turnitin. It also describes Turnitin and its role in detecting plagiarism. The overall goals are to promote academic integrity, explain tools for plagiarism prevention, and ensure ethical practices in research and publishing.
Week 8 Quantitative Research DesignPrevious Next Instructio.docxphilipnelson29183
The document outlines a proposed quantitative research study that will investigate the impact of disclosure of private information by private and governmental agencies on threats to individual privacy rights. The study will seek to answer three research questions through surveys and experiments/quasi-experiments. Statistical analyses like correlations, regressions, t-tests, and ANOVAs will be used to analyze the data and determine relationships between disclosure of information and privacy threat levels. It is hoped the study will provide empirical evidence to inform policies around protecting individual privacy rights in the context of increasing information sharing.
The document discusses various citation databases and research metrics used to evaluate scholarly publications and researchers. It describes major citation databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar that compile citations from bibliographies. It also explains common research metrics like the Impact Factor, h-index, g-index, i10 Index, Cite Score, SJR, and SNIP used to measure the influence and impact of publications and researchers. These metrics are calculated based on factors like the number of citations a publication or researcher receives.
In academia, the pressure to publish is high and the competition intense. This can lead authors to follow unethical publication practices, such as salami slicing, duplicate publication, and simultaneous submission. This slide deck explains these malpractices and shares tips on how authors can avoid them.
I explain plainly what is salami silcing, a practice of fragmenting single research into as many publications as possible. Salami publishing and hazards
Open Access (OA) is a system provide access to knowledge resources with free of cost and other restrictions. This PPT answer to the questions what, why, types, benefits etc. and also describes the creative commons licensing, concept of predatory journals, open access journals, and Sharpa RoMeO.
This document provides information about indexing databases and citation databases. It defines a database as a collection of organized information that can be easily accessed and updated. Indexing databases are described as optimizing database performance by minimizing disk accesses during queries through the use of indexes. The document outlines different types of indexing, including clustered, non-clustered, and multi-level indexing. It then defines citation databases as collections of referenced academic works that can be used to evaluate publications by counting citations. The benefits of using citation databases over general search engines are discussed.
The document discusses author level metrics and how they are used to measure the impact of individual authors. It defines author level metrics as citation metrics that measure the bibliometric impact of individual researchers. It also discusses different types of author level metrics, including article-level metrics, journal-level metrics, h-index, i10-index, g-index, and altmetrics. Finally, it discusses tools that can be used to measure author metrics, such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, and Publish or Perish.
The document discusses publication misconduct, complaints, and appeals. It defines publication misconduct and explains why it is a problem. The various forms of misconduct are identified such as plagiarism, data fabrication, and authorship issues. Methods for identifying and preventing misconduct like utilizing plagiarism detection software and transparent reporting are presented. The process for publication complaints is outlined including how complaints can arise and the steps in the complaint process. Publication appeals are defined and the steps in the appeal process like submitting the appeal and editorial review are described. Finally, the importance of uniform publication ethics standards for all peer-reviewed journals is emphasized.
Rmc0001 research publications & ethics - module 3 (5)KURMAIAHA20PHD1086
This document discusses publication ethics and responsible research practices. It provides definitions and guidelines around topics like plagiarism, authorship, peer review, and conflicts of interest. It also describes organizations that establish standards and best practices for publication, such as the Committee on Publication Ethics and the World Association of Medical Editors. Finally, it discusses issues like misconduct, causes of unethical behavior, and predatory publishers.
Ethical research and publication practices are essential for honest scholarly and scientific research. Most journals today are keenly aware of this: they publish policies on these issues and expect authors to “be aware of, and comply with, best practice in publication ethics”.This article discusses two widespread and related publishing practices that are considered unethical—duplicate publication and simultaneous submission. It draws on definitive international publication ethics guidelines.
This document discusses publication ethics and outlines guidelines for ethical publishing. It begins by defining publication and the key parties involved - authors, editors, peer reviewers, and publishers. Authors should contribute significantly to the work and properly attribute contributions from others. Unethical practices include guest and gift authorships, plagiarism, and research fraud through fabrication or falsification of data. Conflicts of interest should be disclosed. Predatory journals are identified as having questionable standards and practices aimed at profit rather than quality. UGC works to identify and remove predatory journals from their listings to help researchers identify legitimate publication options. Overall the document provides guidance on ethical authorship, reviewing, editing and publishing of research.
Violation of publication ethics can take several forms, including data manipulation, duplicate publication, simultaneous submission, plagiarism, and salami slicing. Upholding publication ethics is important to establish the integrity and credibility of scholarly research. It is the responsibility of authors to avoid fabricating or manipulating data, plagiarizing, submitting manuscripts to multiple journals simultaneously, or including guest authors who did not meaningfully contribute. Organizations like COPE and ICMJE provide guidelines to help authors, editors, and reviewers maintain high standards of ethical publication practices.
Sherpa provides two tools - SHERPA/RoMEO and SHERPA/FACT - to help researchers comply with open access mandates from their funders. SHERPA/RoMEO allows users to search publisher and journal policies on copyright and self-archiving. SHERPA/FACT combines RoMEO and JULIET data to indicate a journal's open access compliance based on the user's selected funder and publication stage. Both tools aim to help unlock the potential of research by facilitating open access.
II Ethics with respect to Science & Research.pptPgtOnLine
This document discusses ethics with respect to science and research. It defines ethics and explains that ethics deals with judgements about human conduct and what is considered right or wrong behavior. The document then discusses research ethics and explains that what is considered acceptable or unacceptable ways of conducting research can vary in different contexts. Finally, it outlines several key principles of ethics in research, including duty to society, beneficence, informed consent, integrity, and protecting privacy and confidentiality of research participants.
This presentation discusses the importance of publication ethics. It defines ethics as dealing with moral principles, and publication ethics as ensuring high-quality scientific publications, public trust in findings, and proper attribution of ideas. It discusses the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which was established in 1997 to discuss publication ethics issues and advise editors. The importance of publication ethics is that it promotes objective research, supports collaboration, ensures accountability, and builds public trust in research findings. Research and publication ethics are closely connected, as published work enters the public domain and must ensure scientific progress, protect life, promote ethical behavior, and support researchers' reputations.
Publication misconduct refers to unethical behavior in publishing, such as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship, and duplicate or overlapping publications. It undermines the integrity of research. Reasons for misconduct include career pressures, lack of training, and inadequate supervision. Consequences include losing one's career and destroying public trust in researchers. Key types of misconduct are fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, inappropriate authorship, duplicate submission, overlapping publication, and salami publishing. Retractions can help make misconduct visible but have limitations as they may not provide full details or be widely disseminated. More transparency is needed regarding misconduct to help prevent and address it.
This document discusses various publication ethics issues including duplicate publication, authorship, scientific misconduct, and conflicts of interest. It provides definitions and examples of these issues, noting that journals exist to enhance the scientific database but also other interests like profits. The document cites a study that found around 0.04% of papers involved plagiarism and 1.35% involved duplicate publication. It discusses best practices for authorship including determining order upfront and documenting responsibilities. Conflicts of interest can mislead readers and include financial, personal, political or academic interests. The Committee on Publication Ethics was founded to address integrity concerns in medical journal publishing.
Selective Reporting and Misrepresentation of DataSaptarshi Ghosh
The document discusses various issues related to scientific misconduct including fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. It notes that these practices undermine scientific progress and can cause harm. It defines fabrication as making up data/results and falsification as improperly changing or misreporting data. Plagiarism involves using ideas or words without proper attribution. Maintaining integrity in research is important for objective and reliable science.
This document discusses various types of academic misconduct, including fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. It defines fabrication as the construction of data that was never actually observed or measured. Falsification is changing or omitting results to support a claim. Plagiarism involves using others' work and ideas without proper citation. The document provides several examples of academic misconduct, such as conducting research on humans without informed consent, ghost authorship, and image manipulation. It emphasizes the importance of ethical research practices.
This document outlines the University of Nairobi's policies on plagiarism and use of the Turnitin software for plagiarism checking. It defines plagiarism and explains the university's plagiarism policy, including forms of plagiarism, penalties, and a 15% threshold for similarity reports from Turnitin. It also describes Turnitin and its role in detecting plagiarism. The overall goals are to promote academic integrity, explain tools for plagiarism prevention, and ensure ethical practices in research and publishing.
Week 8 Quantitative Research DesignPrevious Next Instructio.docxphilipnelson29183
The document outlines a proposed quantitative research study that will investigate the impact of disclosure of private information by private and governmental agencies on threats to individual privacy rights. The study will seek to answer three research questions through surveys and experiments/quasi-experiments. Statistical analyses like correlations, regressions, t-tests, and ANOVAs will be used to analyze the data and determine relationships between disclosure of information and privacy threat levels. It is hoped the study will provide empirical evidence to inform policies around protecting individual privacy rights in the context of increasing information sharing.
Research methodology ethical issues in research an assignmentMaiJoy
This document discusses six key ethical considerations in research: 1) informed consent, 2) invasion of privacy and maintaining confidentiality, 3) deception, 4) protection from harm, 5) data protection, and 6) managing conflicts of interest and affiliation. Violating any of these ethics can have negative consequences like jeopardizing future participation in research, damaging the reputation of the researcher and sponsor, and weakening public trust in the research process. Upholding strong ethical standards is important for conducting research responsibly and building trust.
FC305 Essay’s Guidelines March Start cohort Deadline Mond.docxnealwaters20034
FC305 Essay’s Guidelines March Start cohort
Deadline: Monday 15th of June 2020 by 09.00am
First Draft Deadline: Monday 11th of May 2020 by 09.00am
1000 words (+/- 10% – i.e. 900-1100)
Read all instructions very carefully
1. Your assignment needs to be submitted via VLE Turnitin App on the date given above. Submit both versions in their respective Turnitin portals.
2. You should observe the word count stated on the assignment brief. A 10% margin is allowed above or below the limit. You will lose marks if this is not followed.
3. Penalties apply for late submissions.
4. If you failed to submit on time due to an Exceptional Extenuating Circumstance (EEC), you should submit an EEC form within three days of the assessment deadline. These are available from Student Service and may, depending on your circumstances, affect your final mark.
Choose ONE of the UN Global Issues from the selection available on your VLE (and as instructed in a separate email) and discuss it critically.
Marking criteria
Total Mark for each criterion
Content and Understanding30%
· Relevance
· Appropriate detail
· Depth of knowledge (evidence of understanding of the topic)
· Evidence of research
Critical Thinking20%
· Understanding of the debates relating to the topic
· Evidence of original thought
· Analysis
· Construction of a coherent argument
Structure20%
· Logical and coherent structure
· Clear introduction and conclusion
· Overall presentation
Citation of authority and Bibliography20%
· Accurate referencing
· Variety of sources (at least 5 academic references)
· In text References
Overall style10%
· Overall style ranging from impressive to confusing, inaccurate, or poor
Academic Referencing
A good place to start is with academic sources, also called scholarly sources. These sources can include books, academic journal articles, and published expert reports. Whatever the exact form, academic sources all have in common the fact that they are peer-reviewed. Peer reviewed sources are written by an expert in the field and have passed review by other experts who judged the source for quality and accuracy. If a source is peer-reviewed, you know it is a good choice for high-quality, accurate information about your topic.
Not all sources show whether they are scholarly relevant or peer-reviewed, but there are some clues you should check.
· Look at the author's credentials. They should have an advanced degree and/or an affiliation with a scholarly organization like a university or a science foundation.
· Look as well for a list of references or a bibliography. Most high-quality research is based on other research, so a good source will have a list of works the author studied as he or she was writing it. Check this list to make sure.
· Finally, you can tell a lot about a source by looking at the publisher who publishes it. Scholarly sources should be published by a professional association like the American Medical Association; by a university, for example the Oxford Unive.
FC305 Essay’s Guidelines March Start cohort Deadline Monddepoerossie
FC305 Essay’s Guidelines March Start cohort
Deadline: Monday 15th of June 2020 by 09.00am
First Draft Deadline: Monday 11th of May 2020 by 09.00am
1000 words (+/- 10% – i.e. 900-1100)
Read all instructions very carefully
1. Your assignment needs to be submitted via VLE Turnitin App on the date given above. Submit both versions in their respective Turnitin portals.
2. You should observe the word count stated on the assignment brief. A 10% margin is allowed above or below the limit. You will lose marks if this is not followed.
3. Penalties apply for late submissions.
4. If you failed to submit on time due to an Exceptional Extenuating Circumstance (EEC), you should submit an EEC form within three days of the assessment deadline. These are available from Student Service and may, depending on your circumstances, affect your final mark.
Choose ONE of the UN Global Issues from the selection available on your VLE (and as instructed in a separate email) and discuss it critically.
Marking criteria
Total Mark for each criterion
Content and Understanding30%
· Relevance
· Appropriate detail
· Depth of knowledge (evidence of understanding of the topic)
· Evidence of research
Critical Thinking20%
· Understanding of the debates relating to the topic
· Evidence of original thought
· Analysis
· Construction of a coherent argument
Structure20%
· Logical and coherent structure
· Clear introduction and conclusion
· Overall presentation
Citation of authority and Bibliography20%
· Accurate referencing
· Variety of sources (at least 5 academic references)
· In text References
Overall style10%
· Overall style ranging from impressive to confusing, inaccurate, or poor
Academic Referencing
A good place to start is with academic sources, also called scholarly sources. These sources can include books, academic journal articles, and published expert reports. Whatever the exact form, academic sources all have in common the fact that they are peer-reviewed. Peer reviewed sources are written by an expert in the field and have passed review by other experts who judged the source for quality and accuracy. If a source is peer-reviewed, you know it is a good choice for high-quality, accurate information about your topic.
Not all sources show whether they are scholarly relevant or peer-reviewed, but there are some clues you should check.
· Look at the author's credentials. They should have an advanced degree and/or an affiliation with a scholarly organization like a university or a science foundation.
· Look as well for a list of references or a bibliography. Most high-quality research is based on other research, so a good source will have a list of works the author studied as he or she was writing it. Check this list to make sure.
· Finally, you can tell a lot about a source by looking at the publisher who publishes it. Scholarly sources should be published by a professional association like the American Medical Association; by a university, for example the Oxford Unive ...
A Hypothesis is Placed to Justify the Extendibility of Recommender System/ Re...Dr. Amarjeet Singh
Researchers still believe that the information filtering system/ collaborating system is a recommender system or a recommendation system. It is used to predict the "rating" or "preference" of a user to an item. In other words, both predict rating or preference for an item or product on a specific platform. The aim of the paper is to extend the areas of the recommender system/recommendation systems. The basic task of the recommender system mainly is to predict or analyze items/product. If it is possible to include more products in the system, then obviously the system may be extended for other areas also. For example, Medicine is a product and doctors filter the particular medicine for the particular disease. In the medical diagnosis doctors prescribed a medicine and it a product. It depends on the disease of the user/patient so here doctor predicts a medicine or product just like an item is recommended in a recommender system. The main objective of the paper is to extend the Recommender System/Recommendation system in other fields so that the research works can be extended Social Science, Bio-medical Science and many other areas.
RCH 7301, Critical Thinking for Doctoral Learners 1 ajoy21
RCH 7301, Critical Thinking for Doctoral Learners 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
1. Summarize critical concepts of business scholarship in research writing.
1.1 Define the dissertation within business research.
1.2 Compose a sample problem statement.
6. Evaluate the responsibilities of business administration research.
6.1 Apply an ethical framework to research.
6.2 Explain why ethics are important to businesses and researchers.
Course/Unit
Learning Outcomes
Learning Activity
1.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Article: “It’s a Dissertation, Not a Book”
Webpage: Project Planner
Unit I Assignment
1.2
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Chapter 4
Article: “It’s a Dissertation, Not a Book”
Webpage: Project Planner
Unit I Assignment
6.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 4
Article: “It’s a Dissertation, Not a Book”
Webpage: Project Planner
Unit I Assignment
6.2.
Unit Lesson
Chapter 4
Article: “It’s a Dissertation, Not a Book”
Webpage: Project Planner
Unit I Assignment
Required Unit Resources
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 4: Business Research Ethics
In order to access the resources below, utilize the CSU Online Library to begin your research.
Review the research stages on the Project Planner webpage.
Byrne, D. (2017). Project planner. SAGE Research Methods.
http://methods.sagepub.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/project-planner
Cassuto, L. (2011, July 29). It’s a dissertation, not a book. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(42).
UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
Demystifying the Dissertation:
Ethics of Research
RCH 7301, Critical Thinking for Doctoral Learners 2
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
Unit Lesson
Ethics and Research Ethics
Business research, like all research, is guided foremost by the concept of ethics. Blumberg et al. (2005) offer
a general definition of ethics as being a set of moral norms that we use to guide the moral choices
underpinning both our behavior and the ways that we create relationships with others. While most individuals
have thought about morals and morality, applying the definition of ethics to research requires a consideration
of ethics in general and in relation to how ethics pertain to the appropriateness of a researcher’s behavior
toward the subjects of research and/or toward those entities affected by the research. All research is based
on problems that we find in the real world, and people are impacted by not only the solutions that others might
devise for those problems but also by researchers’ investigations into problems. The nuanced moral territory
where right and wrong are not clear-cut or immediately discernible and where our actions as researchers can
affect others is where our ethical principles are most important to guide our research.
The deontological approach to ethics teaches us that ethical principles should never be compromised in favor
of getting resul ...
The document outlines the research proposal for a study examining the effectiveness of social media advertisements and their impact on consumer perception of a vodka brand. The study aims to determine the influence of social media advertising on customer satisfaction. The objectives are to examine the impact on purchasing decisions and customer satisfaction. The methodology will use both primary research through surveys and secondary research reviewing journal articles. Ethical considerations discussed include informed consent, privacy, integrity, social responsibility, and minimizing harm.
Topic for capstone .Implementing Opiod Risk assessment tool .docxnanamonkton
Topic for capstone
.Implementing Opiod Risk assessment tool from a multidisciplinary pain management approach
The purpose of the doctoral capstone project was to: (a) provide education to nursing staff on implementing a structured risk assessment tool in order to identify risk for imminent aggression, manage risk for imminent aggressive behaviors
Write a 6-8 page double-spaced paper with an additional template in which you analyze potential ethical considerations that may arise from your doctoral project. Determine strategies to address these ethical considerations.
Introduction
Ethical researchers act in honest ways. Ethics are conduct norms or standards that distinguish between right and wrong and acceptable and unacceptable behaviors. Ethical considerations matter because they guard against the fabrication or falsification of data. They promote the pursuit of knowledge and truth, research’s primary goal. Ethical behavior is also crucial for collaborative work because it encourages an environment of trust, accountability, and mutual respect among team members. Likewise, researchers must adhere to ethical standards for the public to support and believe in the research. Although most quality improvement and evidence based practice projects pose minimal risk to human subjects, an IRB screening process for your capstone project is required to ensure the project is meeting the appropriate ethical standards.
The Nuremberg Code (1947) protects human rights and is the leading code for conducting ethical research. It focuses on:
Voluntary informed consent.
Freedom to withdraw from research.
Protection from physical and mental harm.
Protection from suffering and death.
It also emphasizes the risk-benefit balance of conducting research. The Declaration of Helsinki (1964) underscored the importance of protecting subjects in research and strongly proclaimed that individuals’ well-being takes precedence over scientific and social interests.
Good research is well planned, appropriately designed, and ethically approved. Developing and following a research protocol helps to ensure this. Research needs to seek to answer specific questions rather than just collect data. Researchers must obtain approval from the Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee. Researchers also need to pay special attention to vulnerable subjects to avoid breech of ethical codes. Although most quality improvement and evidence based practice projects pose minimal risk to human subjects, an IRB screening process for your capstone project is required to ensure the project is meeting the appropriate ethical standards.
The major ethical issues in conducting research usually involve:
Informed consent.
Beneficence—do no harm.
Respect for anonymity and confidentiality.
Respect for privacy.
You are responsible to ensure your project is conducted ethically and responsibly from planning to publication. Be familiar with ethical principles and follow them strictly. Di.
This document provides guidance on ethical research practices for researchers at ESDC's Innovation Lab. It summarizes key sections of Canada's Tri-Council Policy Statement on ethical conduct for research involving humans. The document outlines core ethics principles of respect for human dignity, respect for persons, welfare, and justice. It discusses justifying research with human participants, assessing risks and benefits, and when formal ethics approval is required. The document also covers obtaining free and informed consent from participants, protecting privacy and confidentiality, exceptions to consent requirements, and responsibilities around disseminating research results. Throughout, it emphasizes respecting participants' autonomy, minimizing risks, and maintaining trust between researchers and participants.
Assigment # 1Discuss about a few human Bacterial and vira.docxjane3dyson92312
Assigment # 1
Discuss about a few human Bacterial and viral infections ? How we can prevent these infections.
All written assignments are to be completed as a minimum 2 page Word document , must be typed (Times New Roman, 12pt font, double-spaced, 1" margins), and must be written in APA format . All sources, including the textbook, must be cited in APA format. You may use internet sources but they must be reputable (i.e. you cannot use wikipedia). Avoid use of quotation marks. You should use your own words throughout your paper to show your ability to interpret and integrate material.
1
Running Header: RESEARCH PROBLEM
7
RESEARCH PROBLEM
RESEARCH PROBLEM
Rodriquez Mitchell
3/10/19
A potential quantitative research problem
Like it is well known and understood, a research problem is always considered to be the statement that is all about a particular area of concern, specifically it can be termed as a condition to be widely improved, a troubling question that at times exists in a scholarly literature or difficulty to be eliminated, in a possible practice that usually points to the need for the deliberate investigation and meaningful understanding.
Research problem
In this case, the research problem is specifically the act of reducing or eliminating workers (employees) noncompliance with either rules or policies that are always considered to be more important for organization operations or security. This automatically includes the reduction of careless noncompliance or inadvertent as well as willful actions by workers who at many times cause harm to an organization. This particular problem has been deeply researched over the years and today it still exists. (Guo, Yuan, Archer, & Connelly, 2011; Vance, Siponen, & Pahnila, 2012; Chen, Ramamurthy, & Wen, 2012; Siponen, Mahmood, & Pahnila, 2014)
Mahmood, Pahnila, and Siponen (2014) clearly explained that all the security incidents have really increased in the past decades and that workers are not consequently following the legal policies that are put in place so as it reduces the risk of the security incident. The compliance with pure security rules or policies is, therefore, a deep concern for companies. Many companies are always concerned about their workers' compliance with other workmates, on the other hand, related policies for instance environment policies and social media policies.
According to the idea of Mahmood, Pahnila, and Siponen (2014), the research which entails on the improvement of the general security policy compliance have;
i. It presents the conceptual idea without the use of any theory.
ii. It uses theory to develop insights without any type of empirical tests
iii. Testing theory based ideas for empirical improvement.
Furthermore, Mahmood, Pahnila, and Siponen (2014); Siponen, Vance, & Pahnila (2012); Ramamurthy, Chen & Wen (2012) and lastly Guo, Archer, Yuan & Connely 2011), are all good examples of research based on the security policy compliance t.
When creating a research plan, researchers must consider potential ethical issues and ensure ethical conduct throughout the entire research process. This includes obtaining informed consent, protecting participants' privacy and safety, ensuring honesty and integrity in the research, properly handling intellectual property, and ensuring the research benefits society. Researchers should continuously monitor their work to make sure all steps follow the highest ethical standards and guidelines. Deviations from these standards should be investigated and subjects informed if changes are necessary.
This document provides guidelines for ethical research conduct. It discusses the importance of ethics in research and defines key terms like ethics, citations, and plagiarism. The document outlines general ethical principles like honesty, objectivity, and social responsibility. It also discusses topics like informed consent and protecting human subjects. Guidelines are provided for using sources, quoting, paraphrasing and summarizing. Common ethical violations like fabrication, falsification and plagiarism are explained. Tips for succeeding in research and avoiding ethical dilemmas are also presented.
This document discusses the importance of understanding the components of scientific research. It explains that exploratory research involves case studies, content analysis, and archival research. A case study is a concentrated focus on a specific topic or person, group, or entity that holds a rare quality. Case studies are used to study how things progress over time. The document also discusses that positionality, which refers to one's worldview, impacts the type of research selected and methodologies chosen. Factors like one's background, beliefs, and characteristics shape positionality and therefore influence the research process.
Research ethics are important for promoting collaboration between researchers and expanding knowledge. Upholding values like mutual respect and fairness is essential in research because it depends on collaboration. Additionally, ethical standards are needed because research involves coordination between many people in different disciplines and institutions.
The document provides instructions for creating an account and submitting assignment requests on the HelpWriting.net website. It outlines a 5-step process: 1) Create an account with an email and password. 2) Complete a form with assignment details, sources, and deadline. 3) Review bids from writers and select one. 4) Review the completed paper and authorize payment. 5) Request revisions to ensure satisfaction, with refunds offered for plagiarized work.
It was Presented in the 1st Refresher Course in E-Learning & E-Governance (Interdisciplinary) on July 30, 2018 at UGC-Human Resource Development Centre (HRDC), Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. I was invited as a Resource Person for the training course.
The document outlines UGC guidelines related to plagiarism and the UGC CARE consortium. It defines plagiarism and discusses its types. It also describes penalties for plagiarism at different levels based on the percentage of similarity. The UGC CARE consortium aims to improve research quality in India by maintaining a list of quality journals. Its goals are to match global research standards and evaluate the credibility of publications.
The document discusses UGC guidelines related to plagiarism and the UGC CARE consortium. It defines plagiarism and explains its types. It also outlines penalties for plagiarism based on the level of similarity found. The UGC CARE consortium was created by the University Grants Commission to ensure high-quality research and combat predatory journals by maintaining a list of approved journals.
The document summarizes a presentation given on data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) and the challenges of conducting them. It discusses the GDPR requirements for DPIAs, potential challenges like ensuring the right expertise, transparency of the process, and quality of the assessment. It also provides a case study of the iTRACK project, which developed an intelligent tracking platform for humanitarian aid workers, and describes their experience conducting an ethics and privacy impact assessment.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
1. https://vidyaprasar.dei.ac.in/topic/b-software-tools-d-use-of-plagiarism-software-like-
turnitin-urkund-and-other-open-source-software-tools/
Unit V: PUBLICATION MISCONDUCT (4Hrs.)
Group Discussion (2 Hrs.) : a) Subject specific ethical issues, FFP, authorship b) Conflicts of
interest c) Complaints and appeals: examples and fraud from India and abroad
Software tools (2 Hrs.) : Use of plagiarism software like Turnitin, Urkund and other open
source software tools.
Subject specific ethical issues
Informed Consent
A norm of voluntary participation is presumed in all sociological research projects. In other
words, we cannot force anyone to participate in our research without that person’s knowledge
or consent (so much for that Truman Show experiment). Researchers must therefore design
procedures to obtain subjects’ informed consent to participate in their research. Informed
consent is defined as a subject’s voluntary agreement to participate in research based on a full
understanding of the research and of the possible risks and benefits involved. Although it
sounds simple, ensuring that one has actually obtained informed consent is a much more
complex process than you might initially presume.
Protection of Identities
In protecting subjects’ identities, researchers typically promise to maintain either
the anonymity or the confidentiality of their research subjects. Anonymity is the more stringent
of the two. When a researcher promises anonymity to participants, not even the researcher is
able to link participants’ data with their identities.
Anonymity may be impossible for some sociological researchers to promise because several of
the modes of data collection that sociologists employ, such as participant observation and face-
to-face interviewing, require that researchers know the identities of their research participants.
In these cases, a researcher should be able to at least promise confidentiality to participants.
Offering confidentiality means that some identifying information on one’s subjects is known
and may be kept, but only the researcher can link participants with their data and he or she
promises not to do so publicly.
Disciplinary Considerations
1. Professional competence
2. 2. Integrity
3. Professional and scientific responsibility
4. Respect for people’s rights, dignity, and diversity
5. Social responsibility
The principle of professional competence states that researchers should recognize their own
limitations and only conduct research for which they have been properly trained. It also states
that researchers should engage in ongoing education for themselves in order to remain
competent. The principle of integrity directs that sociologists be “honest, fair, and respectful”
in all their professional activities including, but not limited to, their research activities. The
third principle, professional and scientific responsibility, guides sociologists to be respectful in
their relationships with one another at the same time that it warns against collegiality if it
impedes one’s ability to behave ethically. This principle balances scientific collegiality with
public trust in sociology. The fourth principle, respect for people’s rights, dignity, and
diversity, addresses the need to reduce bias in all professional activities. Finally, social
responsibility, the fifth principle, states that sociologists should “strive to advance the science
of sociology and serve the public good.”
Interest
An interest may be defined as a commitment, goal, or value held by an individual or an
institution.
Examples include a research project to be completed, gaining status through promotion or
recognition, and protecting the environment. Interests are pursued in the setting of social
interactions.
Conflict of Interest (COI)
A conflict of interest exists when two or more contradictory interests relate to an activity by an
individual or an institution. The conflict lies in the situation, not in any behavior or lack of
behavior of the individual. That means that a conflict of interest is not intrinsically a bad thing.
Examples include a conflict between financial gain and meticulous completion and reporting
of a research study or between responsibilities as an investigator and as a treating physician for
the same trial participant.
Institutional examples include the unbalancing of the institutional mission by acceding to the
space requests of a large donor for an idiosyncratic program.
Other definitions include:
Conflicts of interest are "situations in which financial or other personal considerations may
compromise, or have the appearance of compromising, an investigator's judgement in
conducting or reporting research." AAMC, 1990
3. "A conflict of interest in research exists when the individual has interests in the outcome of the
research that may lead to a personal advantage and that might therefore, in actuality or
appearance compromise the integrity of the research." NAS, Integrity in Scientific Research
Appeals and Complaints
Policy and Process
The below procedure applies to appeals to editorial decisions, complaints about failure of
processes such as long delays in handling papers and complaints about publication ethics.
The complaint should in first instance be handled by the Editor-in-Chief(s) responsible for
the journal and/or the Editor who handled the paper. If they are the subject of the complaint
please approach the in-house publishing contact. (Please check the contacts page on the
journal homepage. If no publishing contact is identified send the query
to ethics.reporting@springernature.com).
Complaint about scientific content, e.g. an appeal against rejection
The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor considers the authors’ argument, the reviewer reports
and decides whether
- The decision to reject should stand;
- Another independent opinion is required
- The appeal should be considered.
The complainant is informed of the decision with an explanation if appropriate. Decisions on
appeals are final and new submissions take priority over appeals.
Complaint about processes, e.g. time taken to review
The Editor-in-Chief together with the Handling Editor (where appropriate) and/or in-house
contact (where appropriate) will investigate the matter. The complainant will be given
appropriate feedback. Feedback is provided to relevant stakeholders to improve processes and
procedures.
Complaint about publication ethics, e.g., researcher's author's, or reviewer's conduct
The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor follows guidelines published by the Committee on
Publication Ethics. The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor may ask the publisher via their in-
house contact for advice on difficult or complicated cases. The Editor-in-Chief or Handling
Editor decides on a course of action and provides feedback to the complainant. If the
complainant remains dissatisfied with the handling of their complaint, he or she can submit
the complaint to the Committee on Publication Ethics. More information can be found here.
Software tools for plagiarism software:
Plagiarism by the dictionary, means “copying another person's words and pretending that
they are your own”. Plagiarism is not considered as a major crime but may fall under the
category of copyright infringement in some cases and is a major concern for educational
institutions and publishing companies. Due to these reasons, there has been an increasing
demand for plagiarism checker software.
List of 15 Best Free Plagiarism Detection Tools of 2021
1. Plagiarism Checker X
2. Grammarly
3. Copyscape
4. Ginger
4. 5. Plagscan
6. Plagiarisma
7. Duplichecker
8. Turnitin Plagiarism Checker
9. Urkund Plagiarism Checker
10. iThenticate Plagiarism Detection Software
11. CopyLeaks Plagiarism Detector
12. Quetext
13. PaperRater
14. Plagium
15. Plagly
1.Plagiarism Checker X
Plagiarism Checker X is one of the best plagiarism detection tool available in the market
because of its diverse features. It is a content scanning tool that helps you identify the level
of plagiarism in documents like assignments, reports and articles. The software has a huge
number of users around the globe, as it is extremely cost effective and reliable to use.
Key features of Plagiarism Checker X:
Scans your documents up to 16 billion web pages across multiple search engines.
It can locate copied content easily and you can get a side-by-side window to do the
comparison.
Supports bulk-cross comparisons which means that you can analyze multiple
documents to determine their originality within single or multiple repositories.
It can cross-examine up to 20,000 words within one second accurately.
Your submitted content is not stored or uploaded anywhere. So, it is extremely safe
and secure in every sense.
Supports 7 languages, i.e. English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Dutch and
Portuguese.
8.Turnitin Plagiarism Checker
Turnitin software has the largest collection of academic and all forms of content on the
internet to check for even the slightest possibility of academic misconduct and content
duplicity. It is widely used by academic professionals to ensure content originality and
ensure the educational excellence. Further, the feedback and grading features empower
students to take up any new content task with confidence.
Features of Turnitin Online Plagiarism Checker:
Instant analysis of content originality with citations and sources
Duplicity results presented in a simple format
Also helps with grammar and spelling checks
Provides suggestions for better word usage
WriteCheck by Turnitin also provides the similarity score
9. Urkund Plagiarism Checker
Urkund’s anti-plagiarism tool helps detect and prevent plagiarism across multiple
languages. As soon as you submit a document for plagiarism detection, Urkund online
plagiarism detection starts retrieving all possible sources to provide an analysis overview.
With machine learning capabilities, Urkund detects the degree of matches, paraphrasing,
and more across different languages.
Features of Urkund:
5. It checks for plagiarism in study materials, published materials and internet sources
Provides relevant matches for plagiarism with higher accuracy
Ensures complete data security and allows you to create a secure content database
Unmatched uptime and analysis delivery speed
Urkund Plagiarism Checker Software Pricing: It provides free guides and cheat sheets
for students; Urkund pricing can be requested on the official website.
Word Limit Per Search: NA
Urkund Anti Plagiarism Software Free Version: Most of the university students in India
have free access to Urkund software.
Urkund Plagiarism Checker App: Web app
Languages Supported: Any language which is Unicode compliant and supports Cyrillic
characters.
10.iThenticate Plagiarism Detection Software
This is one of the most trusted plagiarism detection platforms by researchers, scholars and
publishers. It provides extensive reports that include the most relevant matches for content
duplicity from across the 70+ billion web pages, whether current or archived. Whether you
are a media publisher, government organization or the part of the legal, financial or HR
team, you can ensure higher reputation of your organization with iThenticate.
Features of iThenticate Plagiarism Detector:
You can start easily by buying credits as per your needs
It screens content submissions for duplicity with higher uptime
Provides the most critical matches in minutes
Detailed reports to detect sources of plagiarism.
Grammarly
Grammarly plagiarism checker lets you know whether your content is copied or not.
Grammarly has a premium version which also detects the content that requires citations
and provides an appropriate resource to give credits to the content, wherever needed. It is
a free plagiarism checker for teachers, students and many more.
Copyscape
Copyscape plagiarism checker can be used by just entering the URL of your content or
you can also use the inbuilt Siteliner. It can also check how much of your content has been
copied from other websites. Copyscape is an interesting tool, it not only tells you about
the copied content on your page, but also shows you where your content has been copied.
Key features of Copyscape:
It can send notifications by email whenever your content is copied.
It comes with a WordPress plugin.
Its premium version can check up to 10,000 pages.
It can also allow you to create a ‘private index’ so that whenever any new content
is generated into the system, it will go for a plagiarism check automatically.
Ginger
Ginger develops a plagiarism checker that helps people communicate more efficiently
through mobile as well as desktop devices. They use statistical algorithms in conjunction
with patented Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology to contextually understand
the text and intention. You can upload your text or document and it will automatically
correct any spelling mistake, grammar mistake and misused words.
Key features of Ginger:
Built with the patent-pending technology to fix your document.
Consists of a spell checker which will help you in correcting spelling mistakes.
It is a grammar checker that will fix a vast range of grammatical errors, typos and
wrong usage of words.
6. Has the feature of instant proofreading where your errors will be highlighted side
by side.
Languages Supported: Ginger Translate supports 40 plus languages
Plagscan
Almost 1 million documents are tested on Plagscan every year. It is an advanced
plagiarism detection tool suitable for single users, students, and even large businesses. It
is extremely time efficient and you can get the results within seconds as you can compare,
scan and upload simultaneously on the Plagscan.
Key features of Plagscan:
It can scan multiple webpages by just using the URL.
Supports a variety of languages.
Offers API integration.
It has its own Plagiarism Prevention Tools.
With its servers located in Germany, it keeps your data extremely secure.
Provides structured reports facilitating authentic checking.
Languages Supported: All languages except, Korean, Chinese and Japanese.
Plagiarisma
Plagiarisma is a free plagiarism detection tool that can identify copied content mainly in
your essays, research papers, coursework, and dissertation. Since it is available online, it
is platform independent.
Key features of Plagiarisma:
Works on multiple platforms like Windows, Android, Blackberry, Moodle and the
web.
Supports various platforms like Google, Yahoo, Bing and Scholar.
Helps with search engine optimization
It can support various file formats including Word, PDF, HTML, TXT, XLS, PPTX
and many more.
Support up to 190 languages.
It can be used offline in Windows.
Languages Supported: Supports 190 plus languages
Duplichecker
Duplichecker is an absolutely free tool. It is the best plagiarism checker if you don’t want
to invest in a software because all its feature are available online free of cost. Since it is
available online, it can be used on any platform, at any time, from any part of the world.
It is a free tool great for SEO and it comes with text analysis tools, website management
tools, keyword research tools and SEO backlinks tools.
Key features of Duplichecker:
You can check your content with Duplichecker by pasting your text in the search
bar, with a maximum of 1000 words per search.
You can also check your content by uploading your documents using the browse
button.
It provides paraphrasing and grammar checking tools as well.
Apart from removing plagiarism online, you can also compare the copied content
with the source content simultaneously.