Research
and
Publicati
on Ethics
www.dilipbarad.com
Philosophy and Ethics
•Philosophy: examination of basic concepts: the branch of
knowledge or academic study devoted to the systematic
examination of basic concepts such as truth, existence, reality,
causality, and freedom
•Ethics: study of morality's effect on conduct: the study of
moral standards and how they affect conduct (takes a singular
verb)
• code of morality: a system of moral principles governing the
appropriate conduct for a person or group (takes a plural verb)
• This is to be followed in both, the scientific conduct (research)
as well as, in publication.
Philosophy of Science: Alexander Bird
Nature of Science
• The opinion of the judge, William R. Overton, is interesting in
this respect, because he summed up the criteria he used in
deciding whether creationism is scientific. He said that a
scientific theory has the following features:
• (a) It is guided by natural law.
• (b) It has to be explanatory by reference to natural law.
• (c) It is testable against the empirical world.
• (d) Its conclusions are tentative, i.e. are not necessarily the
final word.
• (e) It is falsifiable.
Questions for the Philosophers of Science
• Judge Overton’s reasons for rejecting creation “science” are useful to us
not only in providing criteria for deciding what may or may not properly
be called science, but also because they highlight many of the ideas
and notions that we as philosophers of science must investigate.
• When we were discussing laws, explanations, and natural kinds we were
concerned with the subject matter, in the most general terms, of a
scientific theory.
• Now we have come to questions like:
• How may we falsify or confirm a theory?
• When is a scientific belief justified?
• When does a scientific belief amount to knowledge?
• The most extraordinary thing about science is the depth and range of
the knowledge it claims to be able to give us, and it is about this
knowledge that the philosophical puzzles arise.
Skepticism and Knowability
• Skeptic:
• somebody who doubts something is true: a doubter of accepted beliefs
• somebody denying knowledge is possible: a member of an ancient
Greek school of philosophy holding the doctrine that real knowledge is
impossible, or a later follower of this doctrine. [Late 16th century. Via
Latin < Greek skeptikos "follower of the Greek philosopher Pyrrho“]
• JoHari Window: I don’t know what I don’t know
•FFP # CCP (cut-copy-paste)
•Only citing the sources is not the
solution, researcher shall
contribute to existing knowledge
•Salami Slicing
COPE | WAME
• COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) is committed to
educating and supporting editors, publishers and those
involved in publication ethics with the aim of moving the culture
of publishing towards one where ethical practices
become a normal part of the publishing culture.
• WAME (World Association of Medical Editors) (pronounced
“whammy”) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit voluntary association of editors
of peer-reviewed medical journals from countries throughout the
world who seek to foster international cooperation among and
education of medical journal editors.
Publication Ethics:
Authorship and Contributorship
Always rely
on
latest
guidelines
Recognized and Predatory
Publisher & Journals
• UGC Care List https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/apps1/home/index
• UGC-CARE List Group I
Journals found qualified through UGC-CARE protocols.
• UGC-CARE List Group II
Journals indexed in globally recognized databases.
• Web of Science
• SCOPUS
• MLA
•List of Cloned Journals
• SHERPA (Securing a Hybrid Environment for Research
Preservation and Access) is an organization originally set up
in 2002 to run and manage the SHERPA Project.
• SHERPA/RoMEO is a service run by SHERPA to show the
copyright and open access self-archiving policies of academic
journals. RoMEO is an acronym for Rights MEtadata for Open
archiving.
• https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ (Screen shot on next slide)
Journal Finder / Suggester Tool
•https://jane.biosemantics.org/
•https://journalsuggester.springer.com/
•https://journalfinder.elsevier.com/
•https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/Apps1/User/
WebA/CAREList
Originality Checker / Plagiarism Check Tools -
Software
• https://www.turnitin.com/
• https://secure.urkund.com/
• https://www.duplichecker.com/
• https://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker
• https://www.quetext.com/
• https://plagiarismdetector.net/
• https://www.prepostseo.com/plagiarism-checker
• https://www.check-plagiarism.com/
Research Metrics
• Journal Impact Factor
• Research metrics are measures used to quantify the influence or impact of
scholarly work. Some examples of this are bibliometrics (methods to
analyze and track scholarly literature), citation analysis, and altmetrics (a
more recent set of alternative methods that attempt to track and analyze
scholarship through various digital media.)
• The development of electronic indexes, Science Citation Index (1963) and
Social Sciences Citation Index (1973), that traced citations to scholarly articles
led to an offshoot database, Journal Citation Reports (1975), that displayed
the journal impact factor. The journal impact factor is a widely used
research metric though its use is often criticized.
h-Index
• [Jorge Hirsch – /Hor-he/]
• Jorge Hirsch in 2005 published a methodology
called the h-index as a citation-based measure of a
scholars total output. This has become a required
measure in some fields.
• For example, if an author has five publications, with
9, 7, 6, 2, and 1 citations (ordered from greatest to
least), then the author's h-index is 3, because the
author has three publications with 3 or more
citations. However, the author does not have four
publications with 4 or more citations.
g-Index
• The g-index is an author-level
metric suggested in 2006 by Leo Egghe.
• The index is calculated based on the
distribution of citations received by a given
researcher's publications, such that given a set
of articles ranked in decreasing order of the
number of citations that they received, the g-
index is the unique largest number such that
the top g articles received together at
least g2 citations.
• Hence, a g-index of 10 indicates that the top 10
publications of an author have been cited at
least 100 times (102), a g-index of 20 indicates
that the top 20 publications of an author have
been cited 400 times (202).
i10-index
• The i10-index indicates the number of academic
publications an author has written that have been
cited by at least 10 sources.
• It was introduced in July 2011 by Google as part
of their work on Google Scholar.
Research Profile
• ORCID, which stands for Open Researcher and Contributor ID, is a
global, not-for-profit organization
• https://info.orcid.org/benefits-for-researchers/
• Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-
reviewed literature: scientific journals, books and conference
proceedings. Delivering a comprehensive overview of the world's
research output in the fields of science, technology, medicine, social
sciences, and arts and humanities, Scopus features smart tools to
track, analyze and visualize research.
• https://www.scopus.com/freelookup/form/author.uri
• https://www.researcherid.com/#rid-for-researchers
Thank you.
www.dilipbarad.com
•We have covered . . .
•What is scientific conduct – ethics in research – scientific
temperament –
•Ethical behavior in research, collaboration
•Ethics in publication – plagiarism etc
•Research Metrics
• Author level metrics to journal level metrics
• Research Profile Digital Platforms

Research and Publication Ethics | UGC

  • 1.
  • 8.
    Philosophy and Ethics •Philosophy:examination of basic concepts: the branch of knowledge or academic study devoted to the systematic examination of basic concepts such as truth, existence, reality, causality, and freedom •Ethics: study of morality's effect on conduct: the study of moral standards and how they affect conduct (takes a singular verb) • code of morality: a system of moral principles governing the appropriate conduct for a person or group (takes a plural verb) • This is to be followed in both, the scientific conduct (research) as well as, in publication.
  • 9.
    Philosophy of Science:Alexander Bird
  • 10.
    Nature of Science •The opinion of the judge, William R. Overton, is interesting in this respect, because he summed up the criteria he used in deciding whether creationism is scientific. He said that a scientific theory has the following features: • (a) It is guided by natural law. • (b) It has to be explanatory by reference to natural law. • (c) It is testable against the empirical world. • (d) Its conclusions are tentative, i.e. are not necessarily the final word. • (e) It is falsifiable.
  • 11.
    Questions for thePhilosophers of Science • Judge Overton’s reasons for rejecting creation “science” are useful to us not only in providing criteria for deciding what may or may not properly be called science, but also because they highlight many of the ideas and notions that we as philosophers of science must investigate. • When we were discussing laws, explanations, and natural kinds we were concerned with the subject matter, in the most general terms, of a scientific theory. • Now we have come to questions like: • How may we falsify or confirm a theory? • When is a scientific belief justified? • When does a scientific belief amount to knowledge? • The most extraordinary thing about science is the depth and range of the knowledge it claims to be able to give us, and it is about this knowledge that the philosophical puzzles arise.
  • 12.
    Skepticism and Knowability •Skeptic: • somebody who doubts something is true: a doubter of accepted beliefs • somebody denying knowledge is possible: a member of an ancient Greek school of philosophy holding the doctrine that real knowledge is impossible, or a later follower of this doctrine. [Late 16th century. Via Latin < Greek skeptikos "follower of the Greek philosopher Pyrrho“] • JoHari Window: I don’t know what I don’t know
  • 14.
    •FFP # CCP(cut-copy-paste) •Only citing the sources is not the solution, researcher shall contribute to existing knowledge •Salami Slicing
  • 17.
    COPE | WAME •COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) is committed to educating and supporting editors, publishers and those involved in publication ethics with the aim of moving the culture of publishing towards one where ethical practices become a normal part of the publishing culture. • WAME (World Association of Medical Editors) (pronounced “whammy”) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit voluntary association of editors of peer-reviewed medical journals from countries throughout the world who seek to foster international cooperation among and education of medical journal editors.
  • 18.
    Publication Ethics: Authorship andContributorship Always rely on latest guidelines
  • 19.
    Recognized and Predatory Publisher& Journals • UGC Care List https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/apps1/home/index • UGC-CARE List Group I Journals found qualified through UGC-CARE protocols. • UGC-CARE List Group II Journals indexed in globally recognized databases. • Web of Science • SCOPUS • MLA •List of Cloned Journals
  • 21.
    • SHERPA (Securinga Hybrid Environment for Research Preservation and Access) is an organization originally set up in 2002 to run and manage the SHERPA Project. • SHERPA/RoMEO is a service run by SHERPA to show the copyright and open access self-archiving policies of academic journals. RoMEO is an acronym for Rights MEtadata for Open archiving. • https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ (Screen shot on next slide)
  • 24.
    Journal Finder /Suggester Tool •https://jane.biosemantics.org/ •https://journalsuggester.springer.com/ •https://journalfinder.elsevier.com/ •https://ugccare.unipune.ac.in/Apps1/User/ WebA/CAREList
  • 25.
    Originality Checker /Plagiarism Check Tools - Software • https://www.turnitin.com/ • https://secure.urkund.com/ • https://www.duplichecker.com/ • https://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker • https://www.quetext.com/ • https://plagiarismdetector.net/ • https://www.prepostseo.com/plagiarism-checker • https://www.check-plagiarism.com/
  • 26.
    Research Metrics • JournalImpact Factor • Research metrics are measures used to quantify the influence or impact of scholarly work. Some examples of this are bibliometrics (methods to analyze and track scholarly literature), citation analysis, and altmetrics (a more recent set of alternative methods that attempt to track and analyze scholarship through various digital media.) • The development of electronic indexes, Science Citation Index (1963) and Social Sciences Citation Index (1973), that traced citations to scholarly articles led to an offshoot database, Journal Citation Reports (1975), that displayed the journal impact factor. The journal impact factor is a widely used research metric though its use is often criticized.
  • 27.
    h-Index • [Jorge Hirsch– /Hor-he/] • Jorge Hirsch in 2005 published a methodology called the h-index as a citation-based measure of a scholars total output. This has become a required measure in some fields. • For example, if an author has five publications, with 9, 7, 6, 2, and 1 citations (ordered from greatest to least), then the author's h-index is 3, because the author has three publications with 3 or more citations. However, the author does not have four publications with 4 or more citations.
  • 28.
    g-Index • The g-indexis an author-level metric suggested in 2006 by Leo Egghe. • The index is calculated based on the distribution of citations received by a given researcher's publications, such that given a set of articles ranked in decreasing order of the number of citations that they received, the g- index is the unique largest number such that the top g articles received together at least g2 citations. • Hence, a g-index of 10 indicates that the top 10 publications of an author have been cited at least 100 times (102), a g-index of 20 indicates that the top 20 publications of an author have been cited 400 times (202).
  • 29.
    i10-index • The i10-indexindicates the number of academic publications an author has written that have been cited by at least 10 sources. • It was introduced in July 2011 by Google as part of their work on Google Scholar.
  • 30.
    Research Profile • ORCID,which stands for Open Researcher and Contributor ID, is a global, not-for-profit organization • https://info.orcid.org/benefits-for-researchers/ • Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer- reviewed literature: scientific journals, books and conference proceedings. Delivering a comprehensive overview of the world's research output in the fields of science, technology, medicine, social sciences, and arts and humanities, Scopus features smart tools to track, analyze and visualize research. • https://www.scopus.com/freelookup/form/author.uri • https://www.researcherid.com/#rid-for-researchers
  • 31.
    Thank you. www.dilipbarad.com •We havecovered . . . •What is scientific conduct – ethics in research – scientific temperament – •Ethical behavior in research, collaboration •Ethics in publication – plagiarism etc •Research Metrics • Author level metrics to journal level metrics • Research Profile Digital Platforms