Downloaded 52 times
![Plate function
• Neutralization[Protection] plate
• Compression plate
• Tension band plate
• Buttress plate
• Bridge plate
14](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/principlesoflockingcompressionplates-200727174943/75/Principles-of-locking-compression-plates-14-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byDr Souvik Paul
Principles of locking compression plates
This document discusses the principles of absolute and relative stability in fracture fixation, as well as locking compression plates. It describes how absolute stability aims to reduce strain below a critical level for primary healing without callus formation, while relative stability allows some motion and secondary bone healing through callus formation. Locking compression plates provide angular stability through locking head screws in the plate and bone, maintaining blood supply while providing fixation. They can be used for compression of reduced fractures or for splinting in multifragmentary fractures.
More Related Content
Similar to Principles of locking compression plates
Principles of locking compression plates
- 1. Absolute and relativestability and locking plate principles Presenter: DR SOUVIK PAUL
- 2. Goal of thisseminar • AO Principles(Martin Allgöwer, Robert Schneider, and Hans Willenegger) • Elaboration of absolute and relative stability • Discuss about locking compression plates 2
- 3. AO Principles 1. #reduction and fixation to restore anatomical relationships 2. Stability by fixation or splintage , as personality of fracture and injury requires. 3. Preservation of blood supply to soft tissues and bone by careful handling and gentle reduction techniques. 4. Early and safe mobilization of the part and patient. 3
- 4. • “Surfaces ofthe fracture do not displace under functional load” • No micromotion Reduction of strain to a level below critical level primary healing without callus •compressive preload and friction •Rigid fixation , perfect alignment Absolute stability
- 5.
- 6. Relative stability • Somemotion secondary bone healing by callus formation • Better in multifragmentary fractures • More fragments less strain between fragments less rigid construct requirement • “Stress distribution”
- 7. Biomechanics of callusformation Post op interfragmentary mobility:- • amount of external loading • stiffness of the splints • stiffness of the tissues bridging the fracture. 7
- 8. Perren's strain theory •ε=d/G where ε-the inter-fragmentary strain, d-fracture ends displacement, & G– gap between ends
- 9. Methods of absolutestability Compression by Lag Screw:> 2500N
- 10. Dynamic compression byTension band
- 11. Methods of relativestability Bridging plate
- 12.
- 13.
- 14. Plate function • Neutralization[Protection]plate • Compression plate • Tension band plate • Buttress plate • Bridge plate 14
- 15. Neutralization Plates • Neutralizes/protects lagscrews from shear, bending, and torsional forces across fx • “Protection Plate"
- 16. Tension Band Plates •Plate counteracts natural bending moment seen wih physiologic loading of bone – tension side – converts bending force to compression
- 17. Buttress / AntiglidePlates • Resist shear forces – Used in metaphyseal areas • Plate must match contour • Buttress Plate – intra-articular fractures • Antiglide Plate – diaphyseal fractures
- 18. Bridge Plates • Goal: –Maintain length, rotation, & axial alignment • Avoids soft tissue disruption
- 19. DCP • First introducedin 1969 by Danis • Revolutionary concept of compression plating • Featured a new hole designed for axial compression • Compression depend on friction of plate over bone
- 20. • allow 1mmcompression • Additional compression with 1 more eccentric screw before locking first screw • Compression of several fragments individually in comminuted fractures • Oval shape allows 25 deg inclination in longitudinal & 7deg in transverse plane
- 21. Problems with DCP •Unstable fixation leads to fatigue & failure • Strict adherence to principles of compression • Compromised blood supply • “Refractures” after plate removal
- 22. Locking compression plate(LCP) dynamic compression unit conical and threaded unit
- 23. Mechanics/biomechanics of plate/screw fixation Platefixation with conventional screws • Screws in tension • Plate/bone friction • Compression at fracture site • Disturbed blood supply Plate fixation with locking head screws (LHS) • Screws in shear • Noncontact plate • No compression of fracture • Preserved blood supply
- 24. Functions of LHS •Always in combination with a plate • Never as lag screw • Never cross an unreduced fracture • Fixation screw – Fix the plate to the bone • Position screw – Keeps two fragments in correct relative anatomical position
- 25. Features and advantagesof LHS • Axial and angular stability • Not preloaded • Cannot be over-tightened • Higher resistance against bending loads • Monocortical insertion is possible • Lag first, lock second • No primary/ secondary loss of reduction
- 26. Features and advantagesof locked plates • Screw-plate system with angular and axial stability • Locked internal fixator/noncontact plate • Individual blade plate • Anatomically contoured • High pull out strength
- 27. Biological advantages • Reducedcompression of the periosteum • Protects blood supply to the bone,less infection • Callus formation/bone healing under the plate bone after plating with a DCP bone after plating with a LCP
- 28. Technical/mechanical advantages • Angularand axial stability • No need for exact preshaping • Good for osteoporotic bone—bicortical LHS • Optimal predefined screw placement • No need for drilling, measuring, or tapping • MIPO is easier
- 29. Splinting with lockedplates—prerequisites • Indirect, closed, no precise reduction • Long plate • Fixation with LHS only on main fragments • No screws in fracture zone • Prebending not necessary • Elastic fixation
- 30. Drawback of fixationwith LHS • Screw insertion is only possible in a 90° angle • Possible loss of the feel for the quality of the bone during screw insertion and tightening • Screw jamming and difficult implant removal
- 31. Splinting with lockedplates—shortcomings and disadvantages • Stability depends on rigidity of construct • Plate takes over the entire load • MIPO is a demanding/difficult technique
- 32. Combination of compressionand splinting with one plate • A combination of both methods is only possible when two different fractures occur in same bone. Indications • Segmental fractures • Articular fracture with additional metaphyseal/ diaphyseal fracture
- 33.
- 34.
- 35. conclusion • Two differentmethods and principles: – compression—absolute stability – splinting—relative stability • no mixture of principles/methods in same fracture
- 36. • Compression platingafter anatomical reduction in articular and simple fractures. • Splinting/bridge plating in multifragmentary • Good for Osteoporotic ,Periprosthetic #