Downloaded 15 times
Uploaded byTim Klapdor
The Changing Context of Learning
The document discusses how the context of learning has changed from being campus-centered to student-centered due to advances in technology and mobility. It notes that learning is no longer confined to physical environments and can occur anywhere through embedded and distributed technologies. A new model is needed that recognizes students' goals, social environments, and access to information instead of relying on traditional campus-based pedagogy. This updated model will provide a more relevant, convenient, flexible, socially connected, and reflective learning experience for students.
More Related Content
Similar to The Changing Context of Learning
The Changing Context of Learning
- 1. The Changing Context of Learning. THINKPIECE 2013
- 2. Tim Klapdor Innovation Technology Officer DIVISIONOF STUDENT LEARNING
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6. Environments. PHYSICAL & SOCIALLOCATIONS
- 7. Higher Education is stuckwith a contextual model of learning that is based around the campus.
- 8.
- 9. Does this modelreflect our student enrolments and what is unique about CSU? Our diversity, strategic goals & community?
- 10.
- 11. It took justseventy years to get from a device the size of a two-story building to a device that fits in your pocket. Seventy years to build a browsable, searchable archive of information, accessible globally. Seventy years between a time when research and data was locked up in books, available to only a privileged few, and a time when information and communication could be obtained by everyone, everywhere. - Karen McGrane
- 12.
- 13. video camera camera gps torch calculator gameboy ereader voice recorder dictionary boardgames newspaper dictionaries maps/atlas notepad radio alarm clock dvd player landline telephone watch diary/planner novels compass usb drive rolodex/contacts photo frame 3g modem pedometer
- 15. situated ! location" mobile static ! environment " dynamic slow ! speed of change " rapid separated ! technology " embedded formal ! structure " organic low ! level of convenience " high abstracted ! authenticity " situated centralised ! resources " distributed PC AGE MOBILE AGE
- 16. situated ! location" mobile static ! environment " dynamic slow ! speed of change " rapid separated ! technology " embedded formal ! structure " organic low ! level of convenience " high abstracted ! authenticity " situated centralised ! resources " distributed PC AGE CAMPUS MOBILE AGE
- 17. MOBILE AGE situated !location " mobile static ! environment " dynamic slow ! speed of change " rapid separated ! technology " embedded formal ! structure " organic low ! level of convenience " high abstracted ! authenticity " situated centralised ! resources " distributed PC AGE CAMPUS STUDENT CENTRED
- 18.
- 19. Learning doesn’t make adistinction between location and physical environment, it follows the student.
- 20.
- 21. Learning is tiedto professional ambition.
- 22.
- 23. Learning Experience high !connected " low high ! social " low high ! proximity " low high ! interactive " low social ! experience " solo dialogue ! communication " exchange CAMPUS STUDENT CENTRED
- 24.
- 25. Relevant. LEARNING CAN BESITUATED RATHER THAN SIMULATED
- 26. Convenient & Flexible LEARNING OCCURSANYWHERE, AT ANY TIME
- 27. Learner Controlled. STUDENTS CAN TAKETHE INITIATIVE AND DIRECT THEIR OWN ACTIVITIES
- 28. Socially Connected. OPEN NEW CHANNELSTO COMMUNICATING WITH PEERS AND EXPERTS
- 29. Reflective. ENABLES EFFORTLESS RECORDINGOF AUTHENTIC LEARNING FOR A PORTFOLIO
- 30.
- 31. PEOPLE’S TASKS & GOALS SOCIAL& PHYISCAL ENVIRONMENTS INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, & INFRASTRUCTURE STUDENT CENTRED
- 32. A Connected & InteractiveCSU Experience.
- 33.
- 34. Images.St. Peter’s Squarein 2005 and 2013 - http://goo.gl/jio4B 1993 vs 2013 - http://goo.gl/ekoCeD Institution designed by Diego Naive from The Noun Project User designed by Łukasz Kupś (ofcapl) from The Noun Project