Trends in publishing and collections development, and some opportunities for UK academic libraries to transform services to meet institutional and user requirements in a fast changing environment.
What is ‘research impact’ in an interconnected world?Danny Kingsley
This talk looks at what researchers need to do to ensure their research is widely disseminated and reaches the largest audience possible. In summary: Publishing a paper is the beginning not the end; Making work open access does not mean it is accessible; Writing in plain language is translating, not dumbing it down; Sharing work involves peer networks and publishing platforms and If you don't take control of your online presence someone/something else will. The presentation was originally given as part of the Cambridge University Alumni Festival on 27 September 2015.
Developing a research Library position statement on Text and Data Mining in t...Danny Kingsley
These are slides from a workshop held during the RLUK2017 Conference http://rlukconference.com/ presented by Dr Danny Kingsley, Dr Deborah Hansen and Anna Vernon.
The Abstract:
"The library community has been almost silent on the issue of text and data mining (T&DM) partly due to concerns about the risk of having institutions ‘cut off’ from subscriptions due to large downloads of research articles for the purpose of mining. This workshop is an intention to identify where the information rests about T&DM - including looking at the details as they appear in Jisc negotiated licenses - consider some case studies and develop together a set of principles that identify the position of research libraries in the on the issue of T&DM. "
This is a presentation given to the RLUK 2016 conference held 9-11 March 2016 at the British Library.
Abstract: Before we challenge something it is helpful to understand it. In this talk Danny Kingsley will draw on a debate piece she recently co-authored that argued that open access has been systematically blamed for problems with the scholarly publishing system. This talk argues that amongst librarians, the knowledge of the scholarly communication system is even weaker than within the research community. As a library community we need to increase real understanding of the beast with which we dance. To do so requires a systematic change to the way librarians are educated, their professional development and a shift from managing the academic literature to participating in the generation of it. To not do so risks irrelevance into the future.
This is a short run through the activities of the Office of Scholarly Communication at the University of Cambridge presented to the Cambridge University Press Library Board meeting on 28 November 2016.
Open access swap shop:Sharing what's worked (and what hasn't)supporting ope...ocoxall
Open access swap shop:Sharing what's worked (and what hasn't)supporting open access publishing in medicine and healthcare.
Owen Coxall, Bodleian Health Care Libraries,University of Oxford.
Library and Information OA support in health care, presented at HLG 2014.
Includes updated slides capturing comments from participants in the session.
Stop Press: Libraries' Role in the Future of PublishingDanny Kingsley
This was presented to the SLA2016 conference in Philadelphia on 12 June.
ABSTRACT: Libraries are moving from curators of bought content to providing access to research or industry outputs. This activity can range from the relatively informal process of dissemination through a repository to acting as publishers - through the hosting of research journals, bibliographies and newsletters to the provision of editorial services and advice. This 90 minute Master Class will look at different models of publishing in the library environment with several examples of publishing activity in different libraries. The session will start with a strategic overview of the need for libraries to actively engage in the dissemination of information created by their organisations. The discussion will cover the staffing implications including how to recruit and train for the required skills sets. Attendees will work through some of the issues that need to be considered if a library is interested in publishing, including some of the legal implications and the different software and technical platforms available. Ideas will be workshopped about ways to engage the institutional community and encourage uptake of services on offer. The class aims to provide practical information to allow attendees to make decisions about what services are achievable to offer their clients, both from a technical and a staffing perspective. Attendees who are currently publishing are actively encouraged to participate in the discussion.
Access to Research Data - Westminster BriefingDanny Kingsley
Advocating good research data management goes beyond simply informing researchers about policy requirements and includes integrated and sophisticated communication. This talk outlines how Cambridge University has met this challenge.
What is ‘research impact’ in an interconnected world?Danny Kingsley
This talk looks at what researchers need to do to ensure their research is widely disseminated and reaches the largest audience possible. In summary: Publishing a paper is the beginning not the end; Making work open access does not mean it is accessible; Writing in plain language is translating, not dumbing it down; Sharing work involves peer networks and publishing platforms and If you don't take control of your online presence someone/something else will. The presentation was originally given as part of the Cambridge University Alumni Festival on 27 September 2015.
Developing a research Library position statement on Text and Data Mining in t...Danny Kingsley
These are slides from a workshop held during the RLUK2017 Conference http://rlukconference.com/ presented by Dr Danny Kingsley, Dr Deborah Hansen and Anna Vernon.
The Abstract:
"The library community has been almost silent on the issue of text and data mining (T&DM) partly due to concerns about the risk of having institutions ‘cut off’ from subscriptions due to large downloads of research articles for the purpose of mining. This workshop is an intention to identify where the information rests about T&DM - including looking at the details as they appear in Jisc negotiated licenses - consider some case studies and develop together a set of principles that identify the position of research libraries in the on the issue of T&DM. "
This is a presentation given to the RLUK 2016 conference held 9-11 March 2016 at the British Library.
Abstract: Before we challenge something it is helpful to understand it. In this talk Danny Kingsley will draw on a debate piece she recently co-authored that argued that open access has been systematically blamed for problems with the scholarly publishing system. This talk argues that amongst librarians, the knowledge of the scholarly communication system is even weaker than within the research community. As a library community we need to increase real understanding of the beast with which we dance. To do so requires a systematic change to the way librarians are educated, their professional development and a shift from managing the academic literature to participating in the generation of it. To not do so risks irrelevance into the future.
This is a short run through the activities of the Office of Scholarly Communication at the University of Cambridge presented to the Cambridge University Press Library Board meeting on 28 November 2016.
Open access swap shop:Sharing what's worked (and what hasn't)supporting ope...ocoxall
Open access swap shop:Sharing what's worked (and what hasn't)supporting open access publishing in medicine and healthcare.
Owen Coxall, Bodleian Health Care Libraries,University of Oxford.
Library and Information OA support in health care, presented at HLG 2014.
Includes updated slides capturing comments from participants in the session.
Stop Press: Libraries' Role in the Future of PublishingDanny Kingsley
This was presented to the SLA2016 conference in Philadelphia on 12 June.
ABSTRACT: Libraries are moving from curators of bought content to providing access to research or industry outputs. This activity can range from the relatively informal process of dissemination through a repository to acting as publishers - through the hosting of research journals, bibliographies and newsletters to the provision of editorial services and advice. This 90 minute Master Class will look at different models of publishing in the library environment with several examples of publishing activity in different libraries. The session will start with a strategic overview of the need for libraries to actively engage in the dissemination of information created by their organisations. The discussion will cover the staffing implications including how to recruit and train for the required skills sets. Attendees will work through some of the issues that need to be considered if a library is interested in publishing, including some of the legal implications and the different software and technical platforms available. Ideas will be workshopped about ways to engage the institutional community and encourage uptake of services on offer. The class aims to provide practical information to allow attendees to make decisions about what services are achievable to offer their clients, both from a technical and a staffing perspective. Attendees who are currently publishing are actively encouraged to participate in the discussion.
Access to Research Data - Westminster BriefingDanny Kingsley
Advocating good research data management goes beyond simply informing researchers about policy requirements and includes integrated and sophisticated communication. This talk outlines how Cambridge University has met this challenge.
Getting an Octopus into a String Bag - The complexity of communicating with t...Danny Kingsley
This is a presentation given to the Researcher to Reader conference held in London 15-16 February 2016 (http://r2rconf.com/)
Abstract: Universities are, by their nature, tribal; but the tribes extend beyond disciplinary boundaries, with different administrative areas having their own behavioural norms. Increased expectations for researchers and their institutions to be accountable for their funding poses huge communication challenges, particularly for large devolved institutions. Many of these tribes are now having to work together in ways that they have not before, creating an unprecedented opportunity.
The main challenges facing universities and authors in moving to OA for journal articles are achieving compliance, managing costs, and realising the benefits of OA. This session will outline Jisc services that help, from submission of an article, through acceptance, to publication and use. It will show how these services build on existing infrastructure, where possible, to provide a solution that, while tailored to UK circumstances, is more widely applicable.
So, what's it all about then? Why we share research dataDanny Kingsley
This is the Keynote talk at a Jisc Research Data Network meeting held at Cambridge University on 6 September 2016. The research data network is designed to be a people network offering participants a place to demonstrate practical research data management implementations and to discuss current issues relating to research data in institutions. This keynote discusses two of the most common excuses for not sharing data and then broadens the discussion out to the need for a move to Open Research of which open data is only a small but essential part.
Simple, secure access to digital resources increases engagement and evidence indicates increased use of library resources leads to better outcomes. But there is a tension between ease of access, security, privacy and good user design. The RA21 initiative has reviewed the common tools available and will set standards for libraries and publishers to follow to deliver the best possible user experience. This session will look at some of the tools that can help set these standards
The Evolving Collection and Shift to OpenLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Cathy King. 2020. “The Evolving Collection and Shift to Open.” Presented at the Research Information Exchange, February 14, 2020, Melbourne, Australia.
About the Webinar
The development and rising popularity of the massive open online course (MOOC) presents a new opportunity for libraries to be involved in the education of patrons, to highlight the resources libraries provide and to further demonstrate the value of the library to administrators. There are, of course, a host of logistics to be considered when deciding to organize or support a MOOC. Diminished library budgets and staffing levels challenge libraries both monetarily and administratively. Marketing the course, mounting it on a site, securing copyright permissions and negotiating licensing for course materials, managing the course while in progress and troubleshooting technical problems add to the issues that have caused some libraries to hesitate in joining the MOOC movement. On the other hand, partnerships such as that between Georgetown University and edX, itself an initiative of Harvard and MIT, allow a pooling of resources thereby easing the burden on any one library. In some cases price breaks for certain course materials used in MOOCs can help draw students to the course, though the pricing must still be negotiated by the course organizer. A successful MOOC, such as the RootsMOOC, created by the Z. Smith Reynolds Library at Wake Forest University and the State Library of North Carolina, can bring awareness of library resources to a broad audience.
In the end, libraries must ask whether the advantages of participating in a MOOC outweigh the challenges. The speakers for this webinar will consider these issues surrounding MOOCs and libraries and try to answer the question of whether the impact of libraries on MOOCs has been realized or is still brewing.
Agenda
Introduction
Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, NISO
MOOCS: Assessing the Landscape and Trends of Open Online Learning
Heather Ruland Staines, Director Publisher and Content Strategy, ProQuest SIPX
The RootsMOOC Project or: that time we threw a genealogy party and 4,000 people showed up
Kyle Denlinger, eLearning Librarian, Wake Forest University Z. Smith Reynolds Library
Rebecca Hyman, Reference and Outreach Librarian, Government and Heritage Library, State Library of North Carolina
MOOCS and Me: Georgetown's Experience with MOOC Production
Barrinton Baynes, Multimedia Projects Manager, Gelardin New Media Center, Georgetown University Library
This workshop will explore the skill sets for scholarly
communication including questions about future
requirements, the language we are using in this space and,
beyond skills, what type of people are suited to different
aspects of librarianship. Scholarly communication requires
people who are able to be flexible in their approach, rather
than ‘rule followers’, which may mean a fundamental shift
in the library workforce into the future. Working collectively,
the session will consider the implications for upskilling our
‘legacy’ workforce.
This workshop focuses on the key decisions involved when contemplating library- or university-based open access publishig against the backdrop of a vibrant, coplex and fast-moving UK and global scene. It touches upon issues of structure, accountability, expectations and also format and genre- e.g. books vs journals or textbooks - and problems connected to the diverse levels of awareness that exist about publishing and open access within academic communities. Andrew Lockett, University of Westminster Press
Be careful what you wish for - unexpected policy consequencesDanny Kingsley
This presentation was given to the LIBER 2015 conference held in London in June. It discusses what policies are trying to achieve, the OA policy landscape, the devaluation of the OA 'brand' the administrative focus of OA, the spiralling cost of gold OA, the expense of green OA, and the potential effect on research practice.
JSTOR has launched a new Labs team charged with partnering with libraries and scholars to build innovative tools for research and teaching. The JSTOR Labs team has successfully used ‘flash builds’ – high-intensity, short-burst, user-driven development efforts – in order to bring an idea from conception to a working, user-delighting prototype in as little as a week. In this talk the presenter will describe the approach to flash builds, highlight the partnerships, skills, tools and content that help to innovate, and suggest ways that libraries can adopt these methods to support innovation and the digital humanities.
Reflections on Open Educational Practice Nick Sheppard
Slides from a presentation by Antonio Martínez-Arboleda on 18 January 2022: A global challenge: digital and open education for inclusive societies
Antonio Martínez-Arboleda is Academic Lead for Open Educational Practice and Co-Director of the Centre for Research in Digital Education of the University of Leeds. Antonio has been a champion and practitioner of open education since 2009, initially as part of the Humbox team and co-researcher of the JISC funded project OpenLIVES on Digitised Life Stories. His scholarship focuses on the areas of OER (Open Educational Resources) and Critical Digital Pedagogies.
Transforming University Research - Mar 2006Jill Patrick
Transforming University Research, Teaching, and Learning through Innovative Library Services. Jill Patrick, Director of Library Services, Ontario College of Art & Design. OCAD Faculty Research Event, March 17, 2006.
Getting an Octopus into a String Bag - The complexity of communicating with t...Danny Kingsley
This is a presentation given to the Researcher to Reader conference held in London 15-16 February 2016 (http://r2rconf.com/)
Abstract: Universities are, by their nature, tribal; but the tribes extend beyond disciplinary boundaries, with different administrative areas having their own behavioural norms. Increased expectations for researchers and their institutions to be accountable for their funding poses huge communication challenges, particularly for large devolved institutions. Many of these tribes are now having to work together in ways that they have not before, creating an unprecedented opportunity.
The main challenges facing universities and authors in moving to OA for journal articles are achieving compliance, managing costs, and realising the benefits of OA. This session will outline Jisc services that help, from submission of an article, through acceptance, to publication and use. It will show how these services build on existing infrastructure, where possible, to provide a solution that, while tailored to UK circumstances, is more widely applicable.
So, what's it all about then? Why we share research dataDanny Kingsley
This is the Keynote talk at a Jisc Research Data Network meeting held at Cambridge University on 6 September 2016. The research data network is designed to be a people network offering participants a place to demonstrate practical research data management implementations and to discuss current issues relating to research data in institutions. This keynote discusses two of the most common excuses for not sharing data and then broadens the discussion out to the need for a move to Open Research of which open data is only a small but essential part.
Simple, secure access to digital resources increases engagement and evidence indicates increased use of library resources leads to better outcomes. But there is a tension between ease of access, security, privacy and good user design. The RA21 initiative has reviewed the common tools available and will set standards for libraries and publishers to follow to deliver the best possible user experience. This session will look at some of the tools that can help set these standards
The Evolving Collection and Shift to OpenLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Cathy King. 2020. “The Evolving Collection and Shift to Open.” Presented at the Research Information Exchange, February 14, 2020, Melbourne, Australia.
About the Webinar
The development and rising popularity of the massive open online course (MOOC) presents a new opportunity for libraries to be involved in the education of patrons, to highlight the resources libraries provide and to further demonstrate the value of the library to administrators. There are, of course, a host of logistics to be considered when deciding to organize or support a MOOC. Diminished library budgets and staffing levels challenge libraries both monetarily and administratively. Marketing the course, mounting it on a site, securing copyright permissions and negotiating licensing for course materials, managing the course while in progress and troubleshooting technical problems add to the issues that have caused some libraries to hesitate in joining the MOOC movement. On the other hand, partnerships such as that between Georgetown University and edX, itself an initiative of Harvard and MIT, allow a pooling of resources thereby easing the burden on any one library. In some cases price breaks for certain course materials used in MOOCs can help draw students to the course, though the pricing must still be negotiated by the course organizer. A successful MOOC, such as the RootsMOOC, created by the Z. Smith Reynolds Library at Wake Forest University and the State Library of North Carolina, can bring awareness of library resources to a broad audience.
In the end, libraries must ask whether the advantages of participating in a MOOC outweigh the challenges. The speakers for this webinar will consider these issues surrounding MOOCs and libraries and try to answer the question of whether the impact of libraries on MOOCs has been realized or is still brewing.
Agenda
Introduction
Todd Carpenter, Executive Director, NISO
MOOCS: Assessing the Landscape and Trends of Open Online Learning
Heather Ruland Staines, Director Publisher and Content Strategy, ProQuest SIPX
The RootsMOOC Project or: that time we threw a genealogy party and 4,000 people showed up
Kyle Denlinger, eLearning Librarian, Wake Forest University Z. Smith Reynolds Library
Rebecca Hyman, Reference and Outreach Librarian, Government and Heritage Library, State Library of North Carolina
MOOCS and Me: Georgetown's Experience with MOOC Production
Barrinton Baynes, Multimedia Projects Manager, Gelardin New Media Center, Georgetown University Library
This workshop will explore the skill sets for scholarly
communication including questions about future
requirements, the language we are using in this space and,
beyond skills, what type of people are suited to different
aspects of librarianship. Scholarly communication requires
people who are able to be flexible in their approach, rather
than ‘rule followers’, which may mean a fundamental shift
in the library workforce into the future. Working collectively,
the session will consider the implications for upskilling our
‘legacy’ workforce.
This workshop focuses on the key decisions involved when contemplating library- or university-based open access publishig against the backdrop of a vibrant, coplex and fast-moving UK and global scene. It touches upon issues of structure, accountability, expectations and also format and genre- e.g. books vs journals or textbooks - and problems connected to the diverse levels of awareness that exist about publishing and open access within academic communities. Andrew Lockett, University of Westminster Press
Be careful what you wish for - unexpected policy consequencesDanny Kingsley
This presentation was given to the LIBER 2015 conference held in London in June. It discusses what policies are trying to achieve, the OA policy landscape, the devaluation of the OA 'brand' the administrative focus of OA, the spiralling cost of gold OA, the expense of green OA, and the potential effect on research practice.
JSTOR has launched a new Labs team charged with partnering with libraries and scholars to build innovative tools for research and teaching. The JSTOR Labs team has successfully used ‘flash builds’ – high-intensity, short-burst, user-driven development efforts – in order to bring an idea from conception to a working, user-delighting prototype in as little as a week. In this talk the presenter will describe the approach to flash builds, highlight the partnerships, skills, tools and content that help to innovate, and suggest ways that libraries can adopt these methods to support innovation and the digital humanities.
Reflections on Open Educational Practice Nick Sheppard
Slides from a presentation by Antonio Martínez-Arboleda on 18 January 2022: A global challenge: digital and open education for inclusive societies
Antonio Martínez-Arboleda is Academic Lead for Open Educational Practice and Co-Director of the Centre for Research in Digital Education of the University of Leeds. Antonio has been a champion and practitioner of open education since 2009, initially as part of the Humbox team and co-researcher of the JISC funded project OpenLIVES on Digitised Life Stories. His scholarship focuses on the areas of OER (Open Educational Resources) and Critical Digital Pedagogies.
Transforming University Research - Mar 2006Jill Patrick
Transforming University Research, Teaching, and Learning through Innovative Library Services. Jill Patrick, Director of Library Services, Ontario College of Art & Design. OCAD Faculty Research Event, March 17, 2006.
Opening Keynote: From where we are to where we want to be: The future of resource discovery from a UK perspective
Neil Grindley, Head of Resource Discovery, Jisc
We used to think of the user in the life of the library. Now we think of the library in the life of the user. As behaviors change in a network environment, we have seen growing interest in ethnographic and user-centered design approaches. This presentation introduces this topic. It also explores changes in how we manage collections as an illustration of this shift towards thinking of the library in the life of the user.
Advocating Open Access: Before, during and after HEFCENick Sheppard
Since “self-archiving” of research outputs was first mooted in the mid-1990s, initiatives towards “green” Open Access (OA) across the sector have met with generally limited success and coverage in institutional and subject repositories is generally cited at around 20-30%. However, since the Finch report in 2012 combined with OA policies from RCUK, also in 2012, and HEFCE the following year, there is little doubt that a tipping point of awareness has been reached. This session will aim to contextualise the HEFCE policy in the broader history of Open Access and present a case study of a non-research intensive University and how the repository manager has sought to liaise with academic support services in order to facilitate knowledge exchange across the University. - See more at: http://www.cilip.org.uk/events/open-access-advocacy#sthash.9YqReHt0.dpuf
Collaborating in medical history at DCDC15toofarthomas
This presentation was delivered at DCDC15 on 13 October 2015 and discusses the UK Medical Heritage Library project currently being delivered by Jisc and the Wellcome Trust.
Watch out, it's behind you: publishers' tactics and the challenge they pose f...Danny Kingsley
This presentation to the libraries@cambridge conference held on the 7th January 2016 describes some of the more surprising activities academic publishers are engaged in and discusses the opportunities and threats these pose for the library community. Prepared and presented by Sally Rumsey Head of Scholarly Communications & RDM, Bodleian Libraries, Oxford University and Dr Danny Kingsley Head of Scholarly Communication, Cambridge University Libraries.
What does success look like when it comes to library discoverability? Index based discovery systems have seen a dramatic rate of adoption since introduction to the research ecosystem in 2009, with more than 9,000 libraries relying on a discovery system to provide users with a comprehensive index to their offerings. Some issues bar the way to providing this comprehensive view, but many challenges have been overcome through collaboration between libraries, content providers and discovery partners. The NISO ODI initiative began to examine these issues in 2011, and released a best practice in June 2014.
Speakers will highlight examples of successful collaboration, note continued areas of challenge, and provide insight on how the Open Discovery Initiative Conformance Checklists can be used as a mechanism to evaluate content provider or discovery provider conformance with the best practice.
Looking at Libraries, collections & technologylisld
**Important note - notes visible in downloaded presentation. **
An overview of research library collection trends. Presented in the context of changing demands of research and learning in a network environment. Behaviors shape technology; technology shapes behaviors. There is also some analysis of the RLUK collective collections study and a quick look at some characertistics of The Bodleian Libraries' collections.
Notes from attending FORCE2019 conference in Edinburgh (October 15-18), covering a range of topics around Research Communications, e-Scholarship, Open Science and Open Access. Links on last slide for full conference programme and presented materials available online.
Alex and Conor introduce SAH Journal (sahjournal.com) as an open access academic journal project involving the collaborative efforts of emerging and established scholars as well as academic librarians. Conor explains the benefits of collaborating with research librarians through publishing. Alex asserts that librarians (libraries) are perfectly positioned to enter into direct competition with established commercial journal publishers. He explains the mechanics of electronic publishing from conceptional planning to implementation via, in this instance, Open Journal Systems (OJS).
What are the key issues and opportunities in digital scholarship, and how sho...Stuart Dempster
Key elements of current and emergent academic practice(s) in the age of AI and machine learning, and how academic libraries can develop resources, people and institutional responses.
How to develop a fundraising strategy for academic libraries archives and spe...Stuart Dempster
In August I was invited to give a presentation on how I would ‘devise and present your approach to developing a fundraising strategy for a special collection and/or archive at the University of Kent'. The attached presentation may be useful to those academic libraries seeking to develop their fundraising strategies and tactics, especially for archives and special collections.
How Imperial College London Library Services is working to improve alumni access to online content and membership of the library. The presentation highlights the successes to date, and the challenges in online provision in particular. The presentation was given at the Alumni Library Forum in Sheffield on 7th June 2017.
Expanding online access to collections for alumniStuart Dempster
How Library Services at Imperial College London have expanded the delivery of online access to collections (e-journals, e-resources etc.) for college alumni
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
How can UK academic libraries respond to the current issues in scholarly publishing and collection development
1. How can libraries respond to the current issues in
scholarly publishing and collection development
Stuart Dempster
stuartsw4@gmail.com
January 2018
2. Today’s outcomes
• Understanding the changes
to scholarly publishing and
collections development
• How should libraries
respond to the current issues
Puglia, Italy,
2017.
4. Scholarly Publishing: So what’s the problem?
‘The scholarly communication and
research evaluation landscape is
locked into historical paradigms
which inadequately reflect the
opportunities of the digital era.
Why hasn’t the Internet disrupted
the practices and the economics of
scholarly publishing?’
Colin Steele, Emeritus Fellow, Australian
National University
http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/images/f/f4/2014-steele-
scholary-comm.pdf
5. Scholarly Publishing: Open Access Publishing, so what’s
the problem?
Whereas the UK path had been to lead
through a partnership between funders
and publishers, this partnership was not
delivering a transition to open access
publishing, and there are doubts that all
publishers are still on board as partners.
Unless measurable success becomes
evident soon, the public funders would
need to re-consider their policy and
approach to open access publishing.
David Sweeney, Executive Chair Designate,
Research England. Jan 2018. https://www.researchinformation.info/news
/analysis-opinion/ape-2018-conference-
report
6. Scholarly Publishing: Piracy. Sci-Hub gets sued and blocked
American Chemical Society and
Elsevier win lawsuits against Sci-
Hub, with $15m and $4.8m
damages awarded respectively.
ACS wins unprecedented
injunction to demand ISPs ,
domain registries and search
engines censor it.
7. Scholarly Publishing: Universities boycott
Elsevier…Editorial board walkouts
• Around 200 German universities and
research institutions (Deal Project)
boycott Elsevier, demanding access to
about 2,500 journals at roughly half the
price that individual libraries have paid
previously.
• Academics resign from editorial boards
(Elsevier, Scientific Reports, Int. Journal
of Occupational and Environmental
Health)
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00093-
7
8. Scholarly Publishing: The rise of preprint...
• Medical Research Council, the
Wellcome Trust and National
Institutes of Health (NIH) welcome
preprints in grant applications.
• New preprint servers emerge,
including EarthArXiv, PaleorXiv,
NutriXIv, MedArXiv (Yale) and
Earth and Space open Archive
(ESSOAr).
http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/the_orb/?p=1172
9. Scholarly Publishing: ‘Disruptive’ Innovation
• Lock-in models for end-to-end
researcher workflow and research
life-cycle management (Digital
Science and Elsevier)
• Service inter-dependency, such as
RIM and citation databases (Web
of Science and Scopus, Converis
and Pure).
• Lock-in models for data portability
and reuse (FigShare, Mendeley and
Overleaf)
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/01/02/workflow-
lock-taxonomy/
10. Scholarly Publishing: Open Access Adoption and Affordability
• Adoption rates have increased. More
UK authors allow immediate OA
37% verses overseas 25%. After a
year, the proportion in OA form was
UK 54% verses and 32% overseas.
• Affordability, costs of OA and
subscriptions exceed inflation (+11%
pa) from 2013-16 from sample.
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/01/22/adop
tion-of-open-access-is-rising-but-so-too-are-its-costs/
11. Collections Development Trends: ‘Big Deal
Cancellations’…and live to tell the tale
• 24 Canadian/US libraries cancel ‘Big
Deal’ packages, from 46 publishers.
• 2 more are negotiating cancellations.
• No outcry from students or faculty,
leading to questions over publisher
supplied usage data.
• ‘On-demand’ article supply services
have low take-up. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/05/01/wolf-
finally-arrives-big-deal-cancelations-north-american-
libraries/
12. Collections Development Trends: User-centric Discovery
Principles
• Access and identity management,
UX, UI and ‘black-box’ indexing
and algorithms stumbling blocks.
• Creation of a taxonomy and
principles create common
understanding for the discovery
environment(s) and decision-
making processes.
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/01/08/discover
y-delivery-user-centric-principles-discovery-service/
13. Collections Development Trends: Print Book Usage Falls
Faster in US Research Libraries
• Steep decline in the use of print
collections result in budget and
space reviews at ARL libraries.
• Circulations per student since
1995 down from 25 to 7, a 72%
decrease.
• Sconul UK statistical data similar,
with some variation.
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/08/21
/less-meets-eye-print-book-use-falling-faster-
research-libraries/
14. Collections Development Trends: Current and looming
technologies
• Extended Reality, combines Augmented
and Virtual Reality (Alexa/Siri
automated services e.g. suggest-a-book,
subs query, renewals etc.
• ‘On-demand’ acquisitions
• VR studio e.g. surgical simulations and
Digital Research Centres
• Blockchain, Linked Data, AI and
Machine Learning… https://hsl.uw.edu/vr-studio/
http://www.ala.org/tools/future/trends/blockchain
15. Collection Development Trends: Skills and Talent
• To meet changing requirements
libraries are increasing using
techniques to nurture talent such as:
• Data and library carpentry
• Operational Excellence
• UX
http://librarycarpentry.github.io/about/
http://uxlib.org
16. Collections Development Trends…
• Emphasis shift from collecting to connecting
• Move from pre-selected to demand-driven
• Shift from print to electronic
• End of the ‘Big Deal’
• Analytics and decision-ready data
• Focus on the student experience (TEF) and
research impact (REF)
17. How should libraries respond…
Print
Local
Licensed
Collections
General
Provider
Selector
Digital
Shared
Open
Workflows
Distinctive
Enabler
Partner
Credit: Roger Schonfeld
18. Libraries should respond…Improve ‘digital’ discovery
• Encourage LMS vendor search algorithms
and indexing improvements
• Build unified discovery layer/navigation
• Optimise scholarly outputs, using
persistent identifiers (ORCHID, DOIs…)
• Collaborate with ‘disruptive’ innovators
• Innovate with AI/Machine
Learning/Linked Data
https://www.wur.nl/en/newsarticle/Open-Access-deals-
added-to-Journal-browser.htm
https://library.soas.ac.uk/Search/Results?lookfor=nepal&t
ype=AllFields&filter%5B%5D=*%3A*&limit=20&sort=rele
vance
20. Libraries should respond…Enhance shared services
• Improve collection management
(UKRR Monographs, regional
consortia…)
• Share licensed assets (CLA Digital
Copyright Store…)
• Explore effective management of
scholarly outputs ( British Library
Partner Repository, UCL ‘Megajournal’
Platform…)
https://www.cla.co.uk/our-services
https://lmlag.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/mlag-workshop-
dec-2017-british-library-repository-devs.pdf
21. Libraries should respond…Make it open
• Advocate and engage academics and senior
management (DORA, FAIR, UK Scholarly
Communications License, REF Green/Gold
OA…)
• Provide effective RDM/Scholarly
Communications services (DOI, Orchid,
Figshare…)
• Support changing funder(s)/publisher OA
compliance (Deposit Data, Pre-prints…)
• Steer enhancements towards an ‘enterprise
repository’
• Develop OA e-Textbooks collectively
http://ukscl.ac.uk
22. Libraries should respond….Optimise workflows
• Simply research workflow (upload,
manage, share, publish data and scholarly
outputs with a DOI, ORCHID and ‘open’
license)
• Streamline reading lists (upload, manage,
publish, ordering, systems
interoperability)
• Process map and streamline ‘customer
facing’ services (renewals, suggest an
asset, document delivery, reservations…)
23. Libraries should respond…Provide distinctive offers
• Enhance access to unique Special
Collections in partnership, using
external funding.
• Promote collections, products and
services to underserved audiences
(alumni, public…)
• Empower innovation and
experimentation teamwork to improve
the UX/UI.
https://www.clir.org/2018/01/clir-announces-2017-
digitizing-hidden-special-collections-archives-awards/
https://alumni.cranfield.ac.uk/Public/Alumni_Library_Onli
ne.aspx
24. Libraries should respond…enabling
• Enhancements in the discovery, access
and use of all relevant content.
• Pivot to digital, ‘on-demand’, open
data and OA scholarly outputs.
• Focus on student success (TEF) and
research impact (REF) through the
provision of products and services.
25. Libraries should respond…Partner
• Consortia purchasing (Jisc, SUPC,
NAG…) reduce costs/improve T&C
• Mission Groups (RLUK, Sconul, Liber…)
to effect network change (open access,
data, science)
• Students and faculty to effect local
change (as above)
• Other institutions to support shared
services, UX, OA e-textbooks,…
26. The future of academic libraries: Strategic Alignment
• ‘Mapping the Future of Academic Libraries : A report for Sconul’ (Padfield, Cox
& Rutter) : November 2017
https://sconul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/SCONUL%20Report%20M
apping%20the%20Future%20of%20Academic%20Libraries.pdf
• MIT ‘Ad Hoc Task Force on the Future of Libraries’ (A set of 10
recommendations) : October 2016 https://future-of-libraries.mit.edu
• University of Manchester ‘Library Strategy’ (3 Goals and Enabling Strategies) :
October 2017 http://www.library.manchester.ac.uk/about/library-strategy/
• And, of course, link it to your Strategy and Operational Plans!
27. Thank you for listening…
Stuart Dempster
E: stuartsw4@gmail.com
January 2018
Presentation will be available on Slideshare
later today
Editor's Notes
This template can be used as a starter file to give updates for project milestones.
Sections
Sections can help to organize your slides or facilitate collaboration between multiple authors. On the Home tab, under Slides, click Section, and then click Add Section.
Notes
Use the Notes pane for delivery notes or to provide additional details for the audience. You can see these notes in Presenter View during your presentation.
Keep in mind the font size (important for accessibility, visibility, videotaping, and online production)
Coordinated colors
Pay particular attention to the graphs, charts, and text boxes.
Consider that attendees will print in black and white or grayscale. Run a test print to make sure your colors work when printed in pure black and white and grayscale.
Graphics, tables, and graphs
Keep it simple: If possible, use consistent, non-distracting styles and colors.
Label all graphs and tables.
What is the project about?
Define the goal of this project
Is it similar to projects in the past or is it a new effort?
Define the scope of this project
Is it an independent project or is it related to other projects?
* Note that this slide is not necessary for weekly status meetings
* If any of these issues caused a schedule delay or need to be discussed further, include details in next slide.
Duplicate this slide as necessary if there is more than one issue.
This and related slides can be moved to the appendix or hidden if necessary.
Prepare slides for the appendix in the event that more details or supplemental slides are needed. The appendix is also useful if the presentation is distributed later.