This document discusses key terms used in research. It defines an abstract as a summary of all sections that helps readers decide whether to read the full report. The significance of the study states the importance of the research. A statement of the problem presents an overview and specific aims generated from the general problem, typically in question form. The scope delimits the research area and parameters while delimitations describe boundaries like sample size and location. A literature review examines previous work on the topic. The methodology explains how the research was conducted regarding design, sampling, instruments, procedures, and analysis. A bibliography lists all sources. Plagiarism occurs when ideas or content are used without acknowledging the original sources.
This is a North Central University essay about analyzing peer-reviewed research. Components include the research problem, purpose, question, sample, method and design, variables, instruments, findings and results, limitations, and the conclusion. It is written in APA format, includes references, and has been graded by an instructor (A).
Develop three research questions on a topic for which you are suzannewarch
Â
Develop three research questions on a topic for which you are most interest.
Access the "Types of Research Design" site.
Select the appropriate research design for your research questions. Â
In your own words, explain the purpose of the design, what these type of studies
tell you
and what they
don't tell you
and.Â
Finally, explain why this design is appropriate for the respective research questions.Â
A research question is a...
clear
focused
concise
complex
arguable
Instructions for all Forums:
Each week, learners will post one initial post per week. This post must demonstrate comprehension of the course materials, the ability to apply that knowledge in the real world. Learners will engage with the instructor and peers throughout the learning week. To motivate engaged discussion, posts are expected to be on time with regular interaction throughout the week. All posts should demonstrate college level writing skills. To promote vibrant discussion as we would in a face to face classroom, formatted citations and references are not required.  Quotes should not be used at all, or used sparingly.  If you quote a source quotation marks should be used and an APA formatted citation and reference provided.
Before beginning your paper, you need to decide how you plan to design the study
.
The research design refers to the overall strategy that you choose to integrate the different components of the study in a coherent and logical way, thereby, ensuring you will effectively address the research problem; it constitutes the blueprint for the collection, measurement, and analysis of data. Note that your research problem determines the type of design you should use, not the other way around!
De Vaus, D. A.
Research Design in Social Research
. London: SAGE, 2001; Trochim, William M.K.
Research Methods Knowledge Base
. 2006.
General Structure and Writing Style
The function of a research design is to ensure that the evidence obtained enables you to effectively address the research problem logically and as unambiguously as possible
. In social sciences research, obtaining information relevant to the research problem generally entails specifying the type of evidence needed to test a theory, to evaluate a program, or to accurately describe and assess meaning related to an observable phenomenon.
With this in mind, a common mistake made by researchers is that they begin their investigations far too early, before they have thought critically about what information is required to address the research problem. Without attending to these design issues beforehand, the overall research problem will not be adequately addressed and any conclusions drawn will run the risk of being weak and unconvincing. As a consequence, the overall validity of the study will be undermined.
The length and complexity of describing research designs in your paper can vary considerably, but any well-developed design will achieve the following
:
Identify the res ...
This is a North Central University essay about analyzing peer-reviewed research. Components include the research problem, purpose, question, sample, method and design, variables, instruments, findings and results, limitations, and the conclusion. It is written in APA format, includes references, and has been graded by an instructor (A).
Develop three research questions on a topic for which you are suzannewarch
Â
Develop three research questions on a topic for which you are most interest.
Access the "Types of Research Design" site.
Select the appropriate research design for your research questions. Â
In your own words, explain the purpose of the design, what these type of studies
tell you
and what they
don't tell you
and.Â
Finally, explain why this design is appropriate for the respective research questions.Â
A research question is a...
clear
focused
concise
complex
arguable
Instructions for all Forums:
Each week, learners will post one initial post per week. This post must demonstrate comprehension of the course materials, the ability to apply that knowledge in the real world. Learners will engage with the instructor and peers throughout the learning week. To motivate engaged discussion, posts are expected to be on time with regular interaction throughout the week. All posts should demonstrate college level writing skills. To promote vibrant discussion as we would in a face to face classroom, formatted citations and references are not required.  Quotes should not be used at all, or used sparingly.  If you quote a source quotation marks should be used and an APA formatted citation and reference provided.
Before beginning your paper, you need to decide how you plan to design the study
.
The research design refers to the overall strategy that you choose to integrate the different components of the study in a coherent and logical way, thereby, ensuring you will effectively address the research problem; it constitutes the blueprint for the collection, measurement, and analysis of data. Note that your research problem determines the type of design you should use, not the other way around!
De Vaus, D. A.
Research Design in Social Research
. London: SAGE, 2001; Trochim, William M.K.
Research Methods Knowledge Base
. 2006.
General Structure and Writing Style
The function of a research design is to ensure that the evidence obtained enables you to effectively address the research problem logically and as unambiguously as possible
. In social sciences research, obtaining information relevant to the research problem generally entails specifying the type of evidence needed to test a theory, to evaluate a program, or to accurately describe and assess meaning related to an observable phenomenon.
With this in mind, a common mistake made by researchers is that they begin their investigations far too early, before they have thought critically about what information is required to address the research problem. Without attending to these design issues beforehand, the overall research problem will not be adequately addressed and any conclusions drawn will run the risk of being weak and unconvincing. As a consequence, the overall validity of the study will be undermined.
The length and complexity of describing research designs in your paper can vary considerably, but any well-developed design will achieve the following
:
Identify the res ...
Part 3 (Due 1/19/15)
To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the "Section B: Problem Description" assignment in Module 2. Appraise each resource using the "Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists," available in the textbook appendix or electronically on the textbook student resource CD-ROM. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.
Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the "Evaluation Table Template," available in the textbook appendix. Use the "Evaluation Table Template" as an adaptable template.
Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:
1) Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2) Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3) Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Module 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Refer to "NUR 699 Literature Support Holistic Assessment."
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section C: Literature Support for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
NUR 699 â Capstone
Literature Support Holistic Assessment
Directions: Utilizing the assessment tool below, the first submission of this portion of the assignment will be graded holistically. In order to achieve the full points for the assignment, all the criteria on the left must be met at the competency level described on the right.
Criteria
12 pts
24 pts
36 pts
48 pts
60 pts
Literature Support
Summarize the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Describe the search method.
Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. Describe research strengths and limitations as well as the validity of the internal and external research.Provides sufficient, compelling, relevant research from peer-reviewed professional jour.
Framework for Program Development and EvaluationReference.docxhanneloremccaffery
Â
Framework for Program Development and Evaluation
Reference: Comeau, J. (2011). Framework for program development and evaluation.Unpublished, Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.
L i c e n s e d u n d e r a C r e a t i v e C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n 3 . 0 L i c e n s e .
1. Understand and analyze qualitative program evaluation design.
2. Compare and contrast experimental and quasi-experimental designs.
3. Analyze pretest-posttest designs.
4. Communicate through writing that is concise, balanced, and logically organized.
Unit 3 - Program Evaluation: Qualitative Research Design
INTRODUCTION
This unit focuses on qualitative evaluation design, data collection methods, and evaluating program
effectiveness. Additionally, you will apply this knowledge to a real-world program evaluation.
OBJECTIVES
To successfully complete this learning unit, you will be expected to:
U03S1] Studies - Multimedia and Readings (Complete the following):
⢠Framework for Program Development and Evaluation view the flow chart/transcript
⢠Writing an Action Research Dissertation: Part One view the media/transcript
⢠Writing an Action Research Dissertation: Part Two view the media/transcript
The Writing an Action Research Dissertation media pieces will help you to understand the
academic writing standards for your doctoral program. You are expected to be proficient in this
type of writing by the end of your program. By using the advice and guidance of the media, you can
refine your academic writing and improve your success in this course and throughout your
program.
⢠Read Chapter 5 - Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement text
o Pay attention to question 7 on page 221. The content this question addresses will be
releant for the first discussion in this unit.
⢠Read Moore and Tananis's 2009 article, "Measuring Change in a Short-Term
Educational Program Using a Retrospective Pretest Design," from American Journal of
Evaluation, volume 30, issue 2, pages 189â202.
o Pay attention to the research design and data collection methods in this study. You
will be analyzing them for two upcoming assignments, one in this unit and the
other in Unit 5.
Constance
Highlight
Constance
Highlight
Constance
Highlight
Constance
Highlight
[U03A1] Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Program Evaluation: Analysis of Study Design
Using what you have learned through the readings and discussions up to this point in the course, read and analyze the 2009
journal article "Measuring Change in a Short-Term Educational Program Using a Retrospective Pretest Design" by Moore
and Tananis. After you have finished your reading of the article, formalize your analysis by addressing the following:
⢠Identify the research design that was employed in the Moore and Tananis study.
⢠Explain whether the research design is experimental or quasi-experimental. Support your explanation by
comparing and contrasting characteristics between the two types of designs.
⌠Make sure ...
Running head: EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 1
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 2
Translating Educational Research into Practice
Problem
For a long time, education research has not been able to impact classroom instructional practices and educational policies. Educational based researchers argue that their primary work is to research the various aspects of learning and teaching to then present their findings at various conferences and publishing them in different educational journals. Their busy schedule does not allow them to train practitioners (Powney & Watts, 2018). On the other hand, practitioners are busy concentrating on there, and they do not have time to review new literature. This brings up the question as to who is responsible for this gap. In the real sense, there should be a connection between the two, and both parties should play a role in bridging this gap.
Practices, Policies, and Procedures That Have Led to the Problem
There are various reasons for this persistent gap between the teaching practices that teachers use and the guidance that educational research provides. However, three of them stand out. They include the trustworthiness issue, teacher preparation issues, and the research practice issue. The trustworthiness issue comes in because much of the published educational research and disseminated to teachers, policymakers and researchers are often not good and of uneven quality. Research is incredibly demanding, and it is not always possible to choose the most appropriate methodological approach. It is essential that the methodology is applied rigorously whether it is for qualitative or quantitative research (Suter, 2012).
Teachers, on the other hand, want to provide quality education to their children. When they turn into research to aid in teaching, their main expectation is that the information they get is trustworthy. If the information is not trustworthy both the teacher and the student will fail terribly. The teachers also have to be prepared. The applicability and relevance of a research finding will be minimal if the administrators and teachers are unable to access the data, unable to develop strategies for implementing the research findings and do not understand or are unable to interpret the research findings in a meaningful and accurate manner (Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk, 2012).
While teacher preparation and research trustworthiness play significant roles in determining the extent to which research informs instructional practices and educational policies, a fundamental problem is our inability to understand and identify an environment where the research findings can be applied in complex school systems as well as classrooms. While specific strategies, instructional models and approaches may be useful in a setting that is controlled, there is scanty information about the factors that impede or foster application of these modalities under varying contexts and among diverse teachers and students' pop.
ASSIGNMENT 2 - Research Proposal Weighting 30 tow.docxsherni1
Â
ASSIGNMENT 2 - Research Proposal
Weighting: 30% towards final grade
Word limit: 3000 (-/+10%) â text only, excluding tables, appendices, references,
covers page, contents.
This is an individual piece of work
Apply the requirements of the Harvard Referencing System throughout the
report.
Use the structure appearing below:
Research Proposal Specifics
You are about to commence a new research project in a field of your choice.
You are expected to write a report that constitutes a research proposal.
1. Working individually, you will:
- Have chosen a clear and specific research question/ aim/ hypothesis for your research;
- Have contextualised your research question/ aim within the academic literature;
- Understand the philosophical and methodological bases for your research;
- Have a sound method to address the research question/ aim/ hypothesis.
2. Use Harvard style in-text citation and referencing.
3. Do not copy any materials you use word for word unless you identify these sections clearly as
quotations.
4. If you paraphrase any materials, you must identify sources through in-text referencing.
5. This is an individual assignment please do not work closely with anyone else.
6. Write 3000 words (+ or â 10%) excluding the header sheet, cover page, contents page, reference
list, footnotes and appendices.
Marks for criteria: Criteria
10% Focus and Completion Does the proposal
address the set tasks in a meaningful
manner?
20% Research Objective Does the proposal
clearly articulate
20% Synthesis and Soundness Does the
proposal place the research objective in
the context of the relevant academic
literature and any relevant past studies?
Does the discussion demonstrate a
comprehensive understanding of that
literature?
30% Research Methods and Methodology Does
the proposal sensibly outline methods for
accessing sources of data that will address
or answer the research objective? Is the
method consistent with the methodology?
10% Clarity of Approach Is the proposal well
organised, logically constructed and
attentive to the needs of the reader? Does
the timeline include an Gantt chart or key
milestones for research?
10% Mechanical Soundness Is the portfolio
clearly written, spell
Structuring the research proposal
1. Introduction (~200 words)
Explain the issue you are examining and why it is significant.
Describe the general area to be studied
Explain why this area is important to the general area under study (e.g., psychology of
language, second language acquisition, teaching methods)
2. Background/Review of the Literature (~1000 words)
A description of what has already known about this area and short discussion of why the background
studies are not sufficient.
Summarise what is already known about the field. Include a summary of the basic
background information on the topic gleaned from your literature re ...
Research methodology at students of university
OBJECTIVE Meaning, definition, purpose and components of research design.
Difference between the terms research method and research methodology.
Sociology and anthropology briefings (C-SAP collections project)CSAPSubjectCentre
Â
This literature review was written as part of the C-SAP (Higher Education Academy's Centre for Sociology, Anthropology and Politics) project "Discovering Collections of Social Science Open Educational Resources". The project ran from August 2010 - August 2011 as part of Phase 2 of the HEFCE-funded Open Educational Resources (OER) programme. The programme focused in particular on issues related to the discovery and use of OER by academics and was managed jointly by the Higher Education Academy [HEA] and Joint Information Systems Committee [JISC].
Topic 5 DQ 2Nov 3-7, 2022Imagine once again that you are an au.docxjolleybendicty
Â
Topic 5 DQ 2
Nov 3-7, 2022
Imagine once again that you are an automobile manufacturing executive tasked with increasing sales in your state. You wish to do a qualitative study to obtain the perspective of sales personnel regarding an incentive program you implemented at few dealerships that quantitatively proved to be successful. The three sources of data for your case study are individual semi-structured interviews, archival documents, and field observations. What are the most significant strengths and weaknesses of the methods for collecting data from these data sources? Why are these significant? What skills are needed to collect the data effectively? Explain. What concerns do you have about the feasibility of implementing these methods of data collection for this study? Explain.
One student already answered the below answer
Use this students answer below to make sure your answer sounds similar
STUDENT ANSWER- In the scenario for the automobile manufacturing company and the perspective of the sales personnel using the semi-structured interview, field observations, and archival documents would have positives and negatives. The semi-structured interview provides an opportunity for in-depth, open-ended questions (Steffes & Jacobs, 2021). The researcher can stray from the established questions, which allows for follow-up questions. A weakness might be the time it takes to interview all the participants, conduct the interview, and the researcher's bias. Field observations can not be recorded as they occur and rely on the researcher's memory. The researcher needs to record the evidence quickly after the event (Steffes & Jacobs, 2021). Finally, archival documents need approval before they are used. For our scenario, looking at companies implementing an incentive program would benefit the research. The data will provide a rich description of the participants. The researcher must be familiar with the research but not provide bias when conducting the research. Some considerations need to be made when collecting data. Modality, time of the interview, if they are recorded, and sharing the purpose of the interview must be disclosed to those participating in the research. Concerns about the feasibility would be money, time, and the number of participants.
Resources:
Steffes, D. & Jacobs, J. (2021). Introduction to sampling, data collection, and data analysis. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), GCU doctoral research: Foundations and Theories.Â
https://lc.gcumedia.com/webbooks/gcu-doctoral-research-introduction-to-sampling-data-collection-and-data-analysis/v1.1/#/chapter/6
Student responses
Original Question-
Topic 5 DQ 1
Think again of the study on the influence of high school principalsâ leadership styles and academic achievement in their schools in your state. The sources of data must be aligned with the research questions and study design, and they must be feasible for administration of the study. Identify five different qu.
Part 3 (Due 1/19/15)
To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the "Section B: Problem Description" assignment in Module 2. Appraise each resource using the "Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists," available in the textbook appendix or electronically on the textbook student resource CD-ROM. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.
Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the "Evaluation Table Template," available in the textbook appendix. Use the "Evaluation Table Template" as an adaptable template.
Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:
1) Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2) Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3) Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Module 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Refer to "NUR 699 Literature Support Holistic Assessment."
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section C: Literature Support for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
NUR 699 â Capstone
Literature Support Holistic Assessment
Directions: Utilizing the assessment tool below, the first submission of this portion of the assignment will be graded holistically. In order to achieve the full points for the assignment, all the criteria on the left must be met at the competency level described on the right.
Criteria
12 pts
24 pts
36 pts
48 pts
60 pts
Literature Support
Summarize the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Describe the search method.
Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. Describe research strengths and limitations as well as the validity of the internal and external research.Provides sufficient, compelling, relevant research from peer-reviewed professional jour.
Framework for Program Development and EvaluationReference.docxhanneloremccaffery
Â
Framework for Program Development and Evaluation
Reference: Comeau, J. (2011). Framework for program development and evaluation.Unpublished, Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.
L i c e n s e d u n d e r a C r e a t i v e C o m m o n s A t t r i b u t i o n 3 . 0 L i c e n s e .
1. Understand and analyze qualitative program evaluation design.
2. Compare and contrast experimental and quasi-experimental designs.
3. Analyze pretest-posttest designs.
4. Communicate through writing that is concise, balanced, and logically organized.
Unit 3 - Program Evaluation: Qualitative Research Design
INTRODUCTION
This unit focuses on qualitative evaluation design, data collection methods, and evaluating program
effectiveness. Additionally, you will apply this knowledge to a real-world program evaluation.
OBJECTIVES
To successfully complete this learning unit, you will be expected to:
U03S1] Studies - Multimedia and Readings (Complete the following):
⢠Framework for Program Development and Evaluation view the flow chart/transcript
⢠Writing an Action Research Dissertation: Part One view the media/transcript
⢠Writing an Action Research Dissertation: Part Two view the media/transcript
The Writing an Action Research Dissertation media pieces will help you to understand the
academic writing standards for your doctoral program. You are expected to be proficient in this
type of writing by the end of your program. By using the advice and guidance of the media, you can
refine your academic writing and improve your success in this course and throughout your
program.
⢠Read Chapter 5 - Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement text
o Pay attention to question 7 on page 221. The content this question addresses will be
releant for the first discussion in this unit.
⢠Read Moore and Tananis's 2009 article, "Measuring Change in a Short-Term
Educational Program Using a Retrospective Pretest Design," from American Journal of
Evaluation, volume 30, issue 2, pages 189â202.
o Pay attention to the research design and data collection methods in this study. You
will be analyzing them for two upcoming assignments, one in this unit and the
other in Unit 5.
Constance
Highlight
Constance
Highlight
Constance
Highlight
Constance
Highlight
[U03A1] Unit 3 Assignment 1 - Program Evaluation: Analysis of Study Design
Using what you have learned through the readings and discussions up to this point in the course, read and analyze the 2009
journal article "Measuring Change in a Short-Term Educational Program Using a Retrospective Pretest Design" by Moore
and Tananis. After you have finished your reading of the article, formalize your analysis by addressing the following:
⢠Identify the research design that was employed in the Moore and Tananis study.
⢠Explain whether the research design is experimental or quasi-experimental. Support your explanation by
comparing and contrasting characteristics between the two types of designs.
⌠Make sure ...
Running head: EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 1
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 2
Translating Educational Research into Practice
Problem
For a long time, education research has not been able to impact classroom instructional practices and educational policies. Educational based researchers argue that their primary work is to research the various aspects of learning and teaching to then present their findings at various conferences and publishing them in different educational journals. Their busy schedule does not allow them to train practitioners (Powney & Watts, 2018). On the other hand, practitioners are busy concentrating on there, and they do not have time to review new literature. This brings up the question as to who is responsible for this gap. In the real sense, there should be a connection between the two, and both parties should play a role in bridging this gap.
Practices, Policies, and Procedures That Have Led to the Problem
There are various reasons for this persistent gap between the teaching practices that teachers use and the guidance that educational research provides. However, three of them stand out. They include the trustworthiness issue, teacher preparation issues, and the research practice issue. The trustworthiness issue comes in because much of the published educational research and disseminated to teachers, policymakers and researchers are often not good and of uneven quality. Research is incredibly demanding, and it is not always possible to choose the most appropriate methodological approach. It is essential that the methodology is applied rigorously whether it is for qualitative or quantitative research (Suter, 2012).
Teachers, on the other hand, want to provide quality education to their children. When they turn into research to aid in teaching, their main expectation is that the information they get is trustworthy. If the information is not trustworthy both the teacher and the student will fail terribly. The teachers also have to be prepared. The applicability and relevance of a research finding will be minimal if the administrators and teachers are unable to access the data, unable to develop strategies for implementing the research findings and do not understand or are unable to interpret the research findings in a meaningful and accurate manner (Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk, 2012).
While teacher preparation and research trustworthiness play significant roles in determining the extent to which research informs instructional practices and educational policies, a fundamental problem is our inability to understand and identify an environment where the research findings can be applied in complex school systems as well as classrooms. While specific strategies, instructional models and approaches may be useful in a setting that is controlled, there is scanty information about the factors that impede or foster application of these modalities under varying contexts and among diverse teachers and students' pop.
ASSIGNMENT 2 - Research Proposal Weighting 30 tow.docxsherni1
Â
ASSIGNMENT 2 - Research Proposal
Weighting: 30% towards final grade
Word limit: 3000 (-/+10%) â text only, excluding tables, appendices, references,
covers page, contents.
This is an individual piece of work
Apply the requirements of the Harvard Referencing System throughout the
report.
Use the structure appearing below:
Research Proposal Specifics
You are about to commence a new research project in a field of your choice.
You are expected to write a report that constitutes a research proposal.
1. Working individually, you will:
- Have chosen a clear and specific research question/ aim/ hypothesis for your research;
- Have contextualised your research question/ aim within the academic literature;
- Understand the philosophical and methodological bases for your research;
- Have a sound method to address the research question/ aim/ hypothesis.
2. Use Harvard style in-text citation and referencing.
3. Do not copy any materials you use word for word unless you identify these sections clearly as
quotations.
4. If you paraphrase any materials, you must identify sources through in-text referencing.
5. This is an individual assignment please do not work closely with anyone else.
6. Write 3000 words (+ or â 10%) excluding the header sheet, cover page, contents page, reference
list, footnotes and appendices.
Marks for criteria: Criteria
10% Focus and Completion Does the proposal
address the set tasks in a meaningful
manner?
20% Research Objective Does the proposal
clearly articulate
20% Synthesis and Soundness Does the
proposal place the research objective in
the context of the relevant academic
literature and any relevant past studies?
Does the discussion demonstrate a
comprehensive understanding of that
literature?
30% Research Methods and Methodology Does
the proposal sensibly outline methods for
accessing sources of data that will address
or answer the research objective? Is the
method consistent with the methodology?
10% Clarity of Approach Is the proposal well
organised, logically constructed and
attentive to the needs of the reader? Does
the timeline include an Gantt chart or key
milestones for research?
10% Mechanical Soundness Is the portfolio
clearly written, spell
Structuring the research proposal
1. Introduction (~200 words)
Explain the issue you are examining and why it is significant.
Describe the general area to be studied
Explain why this area is important to the general area under study (e.g., psychology of
language, second language acquisition, teaching methods)
2. Background/Review of the Literature (~1000 words)
A description of what has already known about this area and short discussion of why the background
studies are not sufficient.
Summarise what is already known about the field. Include a summary of the basic
background information on the topic gleaned from your literature re ...
Research methodology at students of university
OBJECTIVE Meaning, definition, purpose and components of research design.
Difference between the terms research method and research methodology.
Sociology and anthropology briefings (C-SAP collections project)CSAPSubjectCentre
Â
This literature review was written as part of the C-SAP (Higher Education Academy's Centre for Sociology, Anthropology and Politics) project "Discovering Collections of Social Science Open Educational Resources". The project ran from August 2010 - August 2011 as part of Phase 2 of the HEFCE-funded Open Educational Resources (OER) programme. The programme focused in particular on issues related to the discovery and use of OER by academics and was managed jointly by the Higher Education Academy [HEA] and Joint Information Systems Committee [JISC].
Topic 5 DQ 2Nov 3-7, 2022Imagine once again that you are an au.docxjolleybendicty
Â
Topic 5 DQ 2
Nov 3-7, 2022
Imagine once again that you are an automobile manufacturing executive tasked with increasing sales in your state. You wish to do a qualitative study to obtain the perspective of sales personnel regarding an incentive program you implemented at few dealerships that quantitatively proved to be successful. The three sources of data for your case study are individual semi-structured interviews, archival documents, and field observations. What are the most significant strengths and weaknesses of the methods for collecting data from these data sources? Why are these significant? What skills are needed to collect the data effectively? Explain. What concerns do you have about the feasibility of implementing these methods of data collection for this study? Explain.
One student already answered the below answer
Use this students answer below to make sure your answer sounds similar
STUDENT ANSWER- In the scenario for the automobile manufacturing company and the perspective of the sales personnel using the semi-structured interview, field observations, and archival documents would have positives and negatives. The semi-structured interview provides an opportunity for in-depth, open-ended questions (Steffes & Jacobs, 2021). The researcher can stray from the established questions, which allows for follow-up questions. A weakness might be the time it takes to interview all the participants, conduct the interview, and the researcher's bias. Field observations can not be recorded as they occur and rely on the researcher's memory. The researcher needs to record the evidence quickly after the event (Steffes & Jacobs, 2021). Finally, archival documents need approval before they are used. For our scenario, looking at companies implementing an incentive program would benefit the research. The data will provide a rich description of the participants. The researcher must be familiar with the research but not provide bias when conducting the research. Some considerations need to be made when collecting data. Modality, time of the interview, if they are recorded, and sharing the purpose of the interview must be disclosed to those participating in the research. Concerns about the feasibility would be money, time, and the number of participants.
Resources:
Steffes, D. & Jacobs, J. (2021). Introduction to sampling, data collection, and data analysis. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), GCU doctoral research: Foundations and Theories.Â
https://lc.gcumedia.com/webbooks/gcu-doctoral-research-introduction-to-sampling-data-collection-and-data-analysis/v1.1/#/chapter/6
Student responses
Original Question-
Topic 5 DQ 1
Think again of the study on the influence of high school principalsâ leadership styles and academic achievement in their schools in your state. The sources of data must be aligned with the research questions and study design, and they must be feasible for administration of the study. Identify five different qu.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Â
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
Â
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using âinvisibleâ attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
Â
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
Â
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Operation âBlue Starâ is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Â
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
⢠The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
⢠The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate âany matterâ at âany timeâ under House Rule X.
⢠The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
2. SLIDESMANIA
OBJECTIVES
At the end of the lesson, you are expected to:
a. define technical terms in research;
b. make an outline of research; and
c. show appreciation on the
importance of using technical
terms in research.
7. SLIDESMANIA
Researc h is the systematic investigation
and study of materials and sources in order
to reach conclusions and solve problems.
RESEARCH
1. Abstract summarizes all sections and helps
readers to decide whether to read or not to read
the entire report.
2. Significance of the Study states the importance
or role of the study to the beneficiaries.
8. SLIDESMANIA
SAMPLE ABSTRACT
This study aimed to determine the usage of Facebook
and its effect on the BEEd students writing skill; academic
writing and textual communication. The results of the study
show that 47 (78.33%) never used ânâ for âanâ and âuâ for
âyouâ in their academic writing; 35 (58.33%)sometimes used
correct punctuation marks in posting and chatting through
textual communication. And, 41 (68.33%) responded that
their motive of always using Facebook is to chat with their
family and friends.
9. SLIDESMANIA
3. Statement of the Problem
General Problem gives the overview of what the
research aims to achieve.
Specific Problems are detailed or specified aims
which are generated from the general problem.
This can be written in question form.
10. SLIDESMANIA
SAMPLE STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The main objective of this study is to determine the
usage and effect of Facebook on the writing skills of BEEd
students. Specifically, it seeks to answer the following
questions:
1. What are the motives in using Facebook?
2. What are the effects of using Facebook on
studentsâ academic writing?
3. What are the effects of using Facebook on studentsâ
textual conversation?
11. SLIDESMANIA
4. Scope and Delimitation of the Study
Scope explains the extent to which the research area
will be explored in the work and specifies the
parameters within which the study will be operating.
Delimitations are the characteristics that limit the
scope and describe the boundaries of the study such
as sample size and geographical location or setting in
which the study takes place.
12. SLIDESMANIA
5. Literature Review provides a review of what
others have written or researched on concerning
the topic.
6. Methodology explains how the research was
conducted. These include the research design,
population and sampling procedure, research
instrument, data gathering procedure, and data
analysis procedure.
13. SLIDESMANIA
7. Bibliography is a list of all sources or
references used in research.
8. Plagiarism occurs when ideas, information, and
even pictures are used without proper
acknowledgement of the original sources.
14. SLIDESMANIA
ACTIVITY
If you are going to conduct a research
about the effect of distance learning to
the literacy of the studentsâŚ
1. Who will be your respondents?
2. What will you ask them?
3. What is the significance of this study?
