Dr. Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo, MA Deputy Chairman for Policy Studies and Public Sector Innovation National Institute of Public Administration

1. REINFORCING GOVERNMENT POLICY QUALITY:
POLICY QUALITY INDEX
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (NIPA)
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
Dr. Tri Widodo Wahyu Utomo
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

2. Myanmar,
18.75
Timor-­‐Leste,
13.94
Cambodia,
34.13
India,
41.35
Vietnam,
35.10
Indonesia,
50.00
Philippines,
53.85
Thailand,
60.10
Brunei,
71.15
Malaysia,
75.48
Japan,
90.38
Singapore,
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
REGULATORY QUALITY
§ The quality of policies
Percentile rank countries (ranges from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest) rank)
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

3. EVIDENCE
BASED
POLICY
Source: Bappenas (2015)
POLICY
CHALLENGES
There are articles or provisions that clearly contradict
among the regulations
Conflict
There are inconsistent provisions or arrangements in
one statutory regulation and its derivatives
Inconsistency
There is a lack of clarity on the objects and subjects
that are arranged so as to cause unclear language
and systematic formulations that are not clear
Multi
interpretation
The regulation has no usefulness, but the regulation
is still valid or the regulation does not yet have
implementing regulations
Non
operatable
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

4. BACKGROUND
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL
Poor policy quality,
overlapping, not taking
sides with stakeholders,
evidenceless-­based
§ In 2001-­2009 4,000 of the 13,000
local regulations were canceled
§ Did canceling solve the problem?
§ Needs improvement from
upstream and downstream
policies
PQI is an indicator of the of the
deregulation program,
The Indonesian Service Movement
(Gerakan Indonesia Melayani)
PMK Regulation No. 3/2017 on the
Road Map of the Mental Revolution
Movement
How to measure of the quality of
the policy?
How to measure bureaucratic
reform related with improving the
quality of the policy?

5. POLICY
QUALITY
INDEX
(PQI)
• PQI
was
developed
in
2016
• PQI
is
an
instrument
to
assess
the
quality
of
government
policies
seen
from
the
process
of
policy
making
and
how
to
carry
out
the
agenda
setting,
formulation,
implementation
and
evaluation
process.
• The
purpose
of
PQI
is
to
encourage
the
strengthening
of
participation
and
the
principles
of
good
governance
in
the
public
policy
making
process.
Participants
on
2017:
• 12
ministries/institutions
• 3
local
governments
Participants
on
2018:
• 22
ministries/institutions
• 80
local
governments
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

6. EXPECTED
CHANGE
• Various ‘assessment’
policy
quality
• Policy
quality
assessments
provide
different
information
• The
methods
/
instruments
for
assessing
the
quality
of
policies
are
not
the
same
• There
is
no
fast,
precise
and
efficient
system
that
is
easy
to
assess
the
quality
of
policies
• There
is
no
way
to
assess
the
quality
of
policies
for
the
bureaucratic
reform
target
THE NEEDS
PQI
• There
are
similarities
of
instruments
to
assess
the
quality
of
policies
• A
quick,
precise,
efficient
and
easy
policy
quality
assessment
information
system
• Availability
of
national
policy
quality
profiles
EXPECTED
CONDITIONS
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

7. DEREGULATION
Harmonization
of
Laws
and
Regulations
1. Mapping,
revising,
and
harmonizing
with
overlapping
laws
and
regulations
2. Monitoring
and
evaluation
of
the
activities
carried
out
Policy
Quality
Index
1. Dissemination
and
measurement
of
Policy
Quality
Index
2. Advocacy
for
increasing
the
Policy
Quality
Index
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL
PQI
becomes
an
achievement
indicator
of
the
of
the
deregulation
program,
The
Indonesian
Service
Movement
(Gerakan
Indonesia
Melayani)
managed
by
Ministry
of
Civil
Servants
Apparatus
Empowerment
and
Bureaucratic
Reform

8. PQI
FRAMEWORK
Policy
Formulation
Setting Agenda
Policy
Implementation
Policy
Evaluation
POST
DECISION
Measuring
policy
implementation
by
focusing
on
the
planning,
institutional,
and
policy
communication
dimensions.
Measurement
of
policy
formulation
by
looking
at
the
policy
decision
making
process
based
on
several
measurable
criteria.
Measurement
of
the
policy
setting
agenda
for
the
process
of
identifying
policy
problems,
analyzing
policy
problems,
and
public
participation
in
policy
formulation.
Measuring
policy
evaluation
by
looking
at
the
process
of
implementing
policies
and
evaluating
the
impact
of
policies.
Policy
evaluation
for
policies
with
age
≥
2
years
implemented
PRE
DECISION
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

9. PQI ASPECTS
POLICY FORMULATION
PRE DECISION
POST DECISION
POLICY
IMPLEMENTATION
SETTING AGENDA
POLICY EVALUATION
a. Organizing
b. Policy Communication
c. Monitoring
a. Effectiveness
b. Eficiency
c. Impact
d. Values
a. Future oriented
b. Outward Looking
c. Evidence-based
d. Innovative
e. Compliance
a. Problem Identification
b. Study of Actual Issues
c. Public Consultation on Issues and
Assessment Made
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

10. PQI participants
113
Ministries/Non
Ministries/Local
Government
M
• 2 Ministries
NM
• 3 Non Ministries
LG
• 32 Local
Governments
Filled the survey:
37 K/L/D
VALIDATED
PQI
ASSESSMENT
2018
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

12. Basarnas,
6.74
BAPPENAS,
13.10
LKPP,
7.60
KEMENKEU,
11.36
KKP,
14.60
PUSAT,
10.68
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
AGENDA
SETTING FORMULASI IMPLEMENTASI EVALUASI
NILAI
RATA-­‐
R
ATA
2018
PQI
MEASUREMENT
IN
CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

13. Salatiga,
12.88
Surabaya,
18.00
Pematang
Siantar,
6.22
Tabanan,
12.72
Oku
Selatan,
12.70
Tulung
Agung,
17.40
Daerah,
13.32
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
AGENDA
SETTING FORMULASI IMPLEMENTASI EVALUASI
NILAI
R
ATA-­‐
R
ATA
2018
PQI
MEASUREMENT
IN
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

14. FINDINGS
and
LESSONS
LEARNED
• Mostly
there
are
no
studies
and
analysis
were
made
for
decision
making
• The
policy
has
not
provided
adequate
support
for
vulnerable
groups
• In
planning
policy
does
not
involve
the
public
in
its
decision
making
• Both
Central
Government
and
Local
Government
need
to
manage
the
knowledge
in
policy
making
process
• Some
of
the
policy
implementations
can
stimulate
other
added
values
such
as
preserving
natural
resources
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL

15. THANK
YOU
NATIONAL
INSTITUTE
OF
PUBLIC
ADMINISTRATION
CARING
INNOVATIVE
INTEGRITY PROFESSIONAL