Downloaded 42 times
![Credits
➢ Open Neon light CC by-nc-nd-by by “late night movie” [Mart]
➢ T-Shirt “Best things are life are free” by http://zazzle.com
➢ Lady Justitia CC by-nc-nd By lumierefl (Flickr)
➢ “Sorry. We're closed” CC by-nc by Tommaso Galli
➢ OPEN, CC-by-nc-sa by Tom Magliery
➢ Empty box, CC by-nc-nd by Mike Bitzenhofer
➢ Share matches CC by-nc-nd by Josh Harper
➢ Question mark CC by by Stefan Baudy](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/openeducationalresources20110525b-110525140832-phpapp01/75/Open-educational-resources-63-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byFrederik Questier
Open educational resources
The document discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with Open Educational Resources (OER), emphasizing the high costs of educational materials and the need for more accessible, openly shared content. It critiques the current copyright system and DRM practices that limit innovation and sharing in education. The presentation advocates for the collaborative creation of teaching materials and highlights the importance of using Creative Commons licenses to promote open access to knowledge.
More Related Content
Open educational resources
- 1. Open Educational Resources Lesmateriaal? Open moet het zijn! Prof. dr. Frederik Questier Vrije Universiteit Brussel Seminarie onderwijskunde 5: digitaal leren Vlaamse Chamilo gebruikersdag University College Ghent, 25/05/2011
- 2. This presentation canbe found at http://questier.com http://www.slideshare.net/Frederik_Questier
- 3. My background Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 3 3
- 4. My research interests CopyleftFrederik Questier, Vrije Universiteit Brussel 4
- 5. Research and InnovationDirector Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 5 5
- 6. Our social responsibility: how open is the future? Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 6 6
- 7. Student PIRGs (Public Interest Research Groups) ➢ “(US) students spend an average of $900 a year on textbooks and course materials” ➢ “Textbook prices have increased four times the rate of inflation since 1994!”
- 8. Student PIRGs (Public Interest Research Groups) ➢ “Why are textbooks so expensive? ➢ Publishers undermine the used book market. ➢ Publishers “bundle” textbooks with extra CDs, passcodes and workbooks. ➢ More expensive ➢ Supplements expire at end of semester ➢ Publishers keep faculty in the dark about prices. ➢ textbooks market is broken”
- 10. Electronic books? ➢ Would you buy or advise your students ➢ electronic versions of (educational) books ➢ if they were 30% cheaper than paper books ➢ maybe many books on a good reading device ~ paper? ➢ ➢ Be aware: often ➢ limited to 1 year ➢ no access in the higher years of study ➢ limited to buyer ➢ no second hand buying or sale ➢ no library ➢ no extensive printing Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 11 11
- 11. Expensive and incompatible Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 12 12
- 12. Text To Speechsoftware on e-books ➢ Blessing for the blind ➢ 'Copyright violation' according to 'Author's Guild' (publishers) → TTS disabled in Amazon Kindle 2 Remote kill flags discovered! Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 13 13
- 13. DRM: Digital Rights Management or Digital Restrictions Management? ➢ Restricted ➢ export ➢ copying ➢ printing ➢ Text To Speech ➢ in time ➢ to buyer (no second hand market) ➢ biometric identification ➢ user info “inscribed” in the work (Microsoft Reader) ➢ access info sent back to publisher ➢ to certain hardware (e.g. Mac OS X - Apple hardware) ➢ to geographic regions Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 14 14
- 14. DRM ➢ is killing innovation ➢ can prevent legal rights such as ➢ fair use private copying ➢ time shifting ➢ lending services (library) ➢ 2nd hand resale of works ➢ donation ➢ access for disabled ➢ archival ➢ public domain ➢ … Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 15 15
- 15. "The most fundamental way of helping other people, is to teach people how to do things better or how to better their lives. For people who use computers, this means sharing the recipes you use on your computer, in other words the programs you run." 16
- 16. Free Software (“Open Source Software”) ➢ The freedom to ➢ use ➢ study ➢ distribute ➢ improve the program 17
- 17. Free Software includes greatsoftware like 18
- 18.
- 19.
- 20. Mass collaboration worksamazingly for software development... What about learning materials? 21
- 21. First of all: Copyright law is not really helpful... 22
- 22. Lady Justice has lost her sense of balance 23
- 23. Copyright th st 18 century vs 21 century ➢ “for the encouragement of learning” ➢ Economic motives ➢ “to promote the progress of science and useful arts” ➢ Protection on request of author ➢ Protection automatically ➢ 14+14y ➢ Till 70y after death author ➢ Protect authors against publishers ➢ Publishers demand the copyrights ➢ If you give copy to every library ➢ Private and non-commercial reproductions ➢ “Private copiers are pirates” allowed ➢ Protection for DRM
- 24. There are niceexceptions on reproduction and publication rights for educational and scientific purposes But we need the permission of the authors if we want to modify their works
- 25. Creative Commons ➢ www.creativecommons.org Share what you want, keep what you want ➢ 6 combinations of ➢ Commercial – no commercial use allowed ➢ Modifications – no modifications allowed ➢ Sharealike – not sharealike Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 26 26
- 28. Creative Commons ➢ Movie ➢ Wanna work together? ➢ http://support.creativecommons.org/videos/#wwt Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 29 29
- 29. Open educational resources (OER) digitised materials offered freely and openly for educators, students and self-learners to use and reuse for teaching, learning and research
- 30. Why OER ?
- 31. Why Open CourseWare? ➢ Why not: should we consider academic knowledge as (secret) Intellectual Property? ➢ The dark ages of scarcity of information are over! ➢ (Peer) recognition ➢ for teacher ➢ Whose course is referred to most? ➢ Yours or the one one from your 'competitor'? ➢ for university/schools Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 32 32
- 32. Why Open CourseWare? ➢ Increase quality ➢ Teachers working together ➢ Best course modules are ➢ reused most often ➢ getting most feedback ➢ getting better again ➢ Saving time & costs ➢ Teachers can start building course from existing material ➢ Creation of animated or interactive learning objects is often too expensive for development/use by only one institution Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 33 33
- 33. UNESCO Believing that OER can widen access to quality education, particularly when shared by many countries and higher education institutions, UNESCO champions OER as a means of promoting access, equity and quality in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
- 35.
- 36.
- 37. cnx.org Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 39 39
- 40.
- 41. www.flatworldknowledge.com (CCPL)
- 42.
- 45. Does your VLElook like this to the outside world? Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 47 47
- 46. Closed? ➢ The few good reasons for closing an LMS, are probably the reasons why the LMS is not dead yet... ➢ Copyright exemptions for education ➢ Privacy ➢ for minors ➢ for making mistakes ➢ for teachers? 48
- 47. But all therest should be open! 49
- 48. Open ➢ Open Source ➢ Open Standards ➢ Open Courseware ➢ (OpenID) ➢ Sharing students and teachers between VLEs ➢ + Portability ➢ Enable instutional collaboration ➢ (Open Framework) ➢ Sharing apps between VLEs 50
- 49. These generic repositoriesin Chamilo 2.0 are nice Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 51 51
- 50. Specialized learning object repositories are nicer! S. Ternier et al., Interoperability for Searching Learning Object Repositories: The ProLearn Query Language, D-Lib Magazine, 2008, Volume 14 Number 1/2, doi:10.1045/january2008-ceri 52
- 51. Let's avoid the empty box feeling! 53
- 52. But content isno longer king! 54
- 53. What is goodlearning? Jonassen's Model for (constructive) learning environments 55
- 54. wikibooks.org Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 56 56
- 55. Example made withmy students nl.wikibooks.org/wiki/Onderwijstechnologie Frederik Questier Werken met portfolio's May 2011 04/10/05 | pag. 57 57
- 58. Student portfolios Experiences with open publication and student defined access control Extra motivating Copyright! Privacy of patients etc Student awareness needed! Block search engines through robots.txt ;)
- 59. I'GLO Students create Interaction Generating Learning Objects research project Artesis Hogeschool
- 60. OER Barriers? ➢ Awareness ➢ Teachers attitude ➢ Not enough OER yet ➢ Copyright ➢ Limitations of LMS? (licenses, access control) ➢ Funding ➢ Institutional policy ➢ ?
- 61. DARE TO SHARE Copyleft Frederik Questier, Vrije Universiteit Brussel 63
- 62. Que stio Tha ns? n ks !
- 63. Credits ➢ Open Neon light CC by-nc-nd-by by “late night movie” [Mart] ➢ T-Shirt “Best things are life are free” by http://zazzle.com ➢ Lady Justitia CC by-nc-nd By lumierefl (Flickr) ➢ “Sorry. We're closed” CC by-nc by Tommaso Galli ➢ OPEN, CC-by-nc-sa by Tom Magliery ➢ Empty box, CC by-nc-nd by Mike Bitzenhofer ➢ Share matches CC by-nc-nd by Josh Harper ➢ Question mark CC by by Stefan Baudy