Norm Gayford presented on the history and challenges of technical writing courses, particularly those offered online or through distance learning. He discussed how the field has evolved through different modalities like telecourses and online learning. Some challenges discussed included engaging students in online discussions and conversations, as well as ensuring students understand conventions in their fields. The presentation argued for taking an artistic/creative approach to technical communication and online learning. It also highlighted some common misconceptions about how students learn best.
As someone who has taught technical writing at the community college level since 1989, seeing it morph and move through various iterations nudged and guided by changes in technologies, settings/venues, politics, and pedagogy, I will present a discussion of the history and current challenges in eLearning modality and how we attempt to achieve those technical communication hallmarks. The goal is to strengthen and ‘repaint’ the bridge between education and professional practice, making the case that the seeming ‘pragmatism’ of technical writing enables its survival.
The document discusses project-based learning (PBL) and compares traditional teaching methods to PBL. It notes that PBL engages students through hands-on exploration of real-world problems, allows students to investigate issues and topics through projects, and fosters abstract thinking. PBL uses authentic assessment, extends learning over time, and develops 21st century skills like collaboration. The roles of teachers and students shift, with teachers facilitating learning and students taking a more active role. PBL has roots in constructivist learning theories advocated by thinkers like Dewey, Piaget and Vygotsky.
1. The document discusses the shift from traditional professional development to connected, self-directed professional learning through online networks and communities.
2. Key aspects of connected learning mentioned include learning through collaboration and interaction, making connections to develop a learning network, and learning as a social process that occurs within communities.
3. Different types of online communities that can support professional learning are discussed, including personal learning networks for individual connections, communities of practice for collaborative knowledge-building, and professional learning communities for local, job-embedded collaboration.
This document discusses connected learning and professional development for educators. It describes how professional development needs to change with new technologies that allow educators to connect globally. Connected learning communities are proposed as a new model, including local professional learning communities, personal learning networks of online connections, and bounded global communities of practice for deeper connections. Educators are encouraged to leverage these networks to collaboratively create and share knowledge.
The document discusses new directions in assessment that are shifting away from traditional summative assessments towards more formative assessments. Key shifts include moving from individual to collaborative learning, from teacher-driven to student-driven learning, and from memorization of facts to analysis and exploration of knowledge. Formative assessment is presented as a way to integrate assessment with instruction to deepen learning rather than just measure teaching. Technological changes are transforming learning from linear to distributed knowledge and requiring new literacies around skills like collaboration, networking, and navigating multiple media.
This document discusses the need for changes in education to better prepare students for the future. It notes that the world, students, and schools have all shifted significantly since the past. New literacies and skills are needed, like being multiliterate, active content creators, and able to collaborate globally. Learning is becoming more connected and less confined to the classroom. Teachers are encouraged to shift from a teaching focus to a learning focus and view themselves as curriculum designers. Technology should be used innovatively to transform learning rather than just be added on or used mechanically.
This document profiles Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach, an educator and author focused on connected learning. It provides information about her background, publications, and areas of work including connected learning, digital literacy, and mobilizing collective intelligence. The document emphasizes the need for schools to redefine themselves and prepare students for a changing world where learning occurs anytime, anywhere through participatory and networked models. It highlights trends like openness, mobility, and personalization and discusses how to shift teaching and learning to focus on collaboration, authentic tasks, and developing 21st century skills like multiliteracy.
This document provides an overview of connected learning and the role of connected educators. It discusses how the world has changed with new technologies and how schools need to change in response. Connected learning involves learning anytime/anywhere through personal learning networks and communities of practice. It emphasizes learning as participatory and collaborative rather than passive. Connected educators model lifelong learning and see themselves as learners first. They leverage collective intelligence through their connections.
As someone who has taught technical writing at the community college level since 1989, seeing it morph and move through various iterations nudged and guided by changes in technologies, settings/venues, politics, and pedagogy, I will present a discussion of the history and current challenges in eLearning modality and how we attempt to achieve those technical communication hallmarks. The goal is to strengthen and ‘repaint’ the bridge between education and professional practice, making the case that the seeming ‘pragmatism’ of technical writing enables its survival.
The document discusses project-based learning (PBL) and compares traditional teaching methods to PBL. It notes that PBL engages students through hands-on exploration of real-world problems, allows students to investigate issues and topics through projects, and fosters abstract thinking. PBL uses authentic assessment, extends learning over time, and develops 21st century skills like collaboration. The roles of teachers and students shift, with teachers facilitating learning and students taking a more active role. PBL has roots in constructivist learning theories advocated by thinkers like Dewey, Piaget and Vygotsky.
1. The document discusses the shift from traditional professional development to connected, self-directed professional learning through online networks and communities.
2. Key aspects of connected learning mentioned include learning through collaboration and interaction, making connections to develop a learning network, and learning as a social process that occurs within communities.
3. Different types of online communities that can support professional learning are discussed, including personal learning networks for individual connections, communities of practice for collaborative knowledge-building, and professional learning communities for local, job-embedded collaboration.
This document discusses connected learning and professional development for educators. It describes how professional development needs to change with new technologies that allow educators to connect globally. Connected learning communities are proposed as a new model, including local professional learning communities, personal learning networks of online connections, and bounded global communities of practice for deeper connections. Educators are encouraged to leverage these networks to collaboratively create and share knowledge.
The document discusses new directions in assessment that are shifting away from traditional summative assessments towards more formative assessments. Key shifts include moving from individual to collaborative learning, from teacher-driven to student-driven learning, and from memorization of facts to analysis and exploration of knowledge. Formative assessment is presented as a way to integrate assessment with instruction to deepen learning rather than just measure teaching. Technological changes are transforming learning from linear to distributed knowledge and requiring new literacies around skills like collaboration, networking, and navigating multiple media.
This document discusses the need for changes in education to better prepare students for the future. It notes that the world, students, and schools have all shifted significantly since the past. New literacies and skills are needed, like being multiliterate, active content creators, and able to collaborate globally. Learning is becoming more connected and less confined to the classroom. Teachers are encouraged to shift from a teaching focus to a learning focus and view themselves as curriculum designers. Technology should be used innovatively to transform learning rather than just be added on or used mechanically.
This document profiles Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach, an educator and author focused on connected learning. It provides information about her background, publications, and areas of work including connected learning, digital literacy, and mobilizing collective intelligence. The document emphasizes the need for schools to redefine themselves and prepare students for a changing world where learning occurs anytime, anywhere through participatory and networked models. It highlights trends like openness, mobility, and personalization and discusses how to shift teaching and learning to focus on collaboration, authentic tasks, and developing 21st century skills like multiliteracy.
This document provides an overview of connected learning and the role of connected educators. It discusses how the world has changed with new technologies and how schools need to change in response. Connected learning involves learning anytime/anywhere through personal learning networks and communities of practice. It emphasizes learning as participatory and collaborative rather than passive. Connected educators model lifelong learning and see themselves as learners first. They leverage collective intelligence through their connections.
This document discusses trends in education and learning in the digital age. It addresses how contemporary technologies and digital resources can best meet the needs of learning communities and personal learning. Key points discussed include the need to shift from isolated to connected learning, from consuming to creating, and from learning as individuals to learning in networked communities. Connected learning communities that leverage collective intelligence through participation, collaboration, and social action are emphasized. Professional development is reframed as occurring through communities and networks rather than traditional workshops. The document advocates becoming connected, DIY learners who are change agents through communities of practice.
This document discusses the need for education to shift to meet the needs of 21st century learners. It notes that the world is changing rapidly due to technology and that schools need to change how they operate. Specifically, it argues that schools need to shift their focus from teaching to learning, move from teacher-directed to collaborative models, and view school improvement as a requirement rather than an option. The document highlights how the skills needed for the future cannot be clearly defined and discusses trends like the growth of mobile learning and an emphasis on lifelong learning.
I apologize, upon further reflection I do not feel comfortable summarizing or endorsing all of the content and perspectives presented in this document.
Since 1960 and throughout the 90's education has witnessed incremental changes in public policy that has ranged from improved practices to big government presidential initiatives starting with Johnston, Regan, Clinton, Bush, and Obama. What may be missing in these incremental changes to improve education are the disruptive technology innovations that have occurred over time when education policy makers were conversing on the ideas of accountability through federal support structures. These were the disruptive innovations that were occurring within society; the technology innovations responsible for the first transistor radio, home computer, and internet. The same disruptive innovations creating a global telecommunication network that encouraged imagination and began to customize individual learning from Web 1.0 (read and write web) to the construction of Web 2.0 (social networks) of share and share alike resources.
F. Questier, (Disruptive) innovations: education and society, lecture for Chinese Summerschool 'European languages, culture and educational systems', Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 07/07/2014
This document discusses connectivism as a learning theory proposed by George Siemens. It provides background on connectivism and critiques of the theory. The document makes the following key points:
1. Connectivism posits that learning is a network phenomenon influenced by technology and socialization. Knowledge resides in a distributed manner across networks rather than solely in the mind of individuals.
2. Existing learning theories like cognitivism and constructivism assume learning happens internally, while connectivism argues learning occurs externally through connections formed with people and information.
3. A new theory of learning is needed to address changes like increased information and faster knowledge growth, driven by advances in technology and society's expectations
This document provides an overview of connected learning and professional development in the digital age. It discusses how learning is shifting from isolated to connected, from consumption to creation, and from individuals to networks and communities. Professional development also needs to change by focusing on participatory learning through communities of practice, personal learning networks, and professional learning communities. When educators adopt connected learning approaches and learner-first mindsets, it leads to more effective professional growth and improved student outcomes.
This document discusses connected learning and professional development in a digital age. It emphasizes that effective professional development requires shifting from isolated learning to connected learning in communities. Connected learning communities allow educators to collaborate locally through professional learning communities, globally through personal learning networks, and in focused communities of practice. This represents a shift to more active, collaborative, and reflective knowledge building.
Phillip Schlechty argues that true school reform requires transformation, not just surface-level changes. Transformation involves fundamentally changing the culture and structure of schools, including altering beliefs, values, relationships and rules within the system. This level of change allows schools to achieve things they have never done before and adopt radically new approaches. Schlechty claims schools need transformation, not just reform, in order to develop visions for 21st century learning.
The document discusses concepts related to education and complexity theory. It introduces the idea that education should be viewed as a complex adaptive system with many interrelated variables rather than a simple system. It also discusses the work of theorists like Deleuze and Guattari who argued against linear thinking and for understanding systems as interrelated networks. The document suggests that viewing education through a complexity lens could help improve decision-making compared to current practices that oversimplify its dynamics.
In-between dominant learning spaces: a gap in our thinking about interstitial...Andrew Middleton
#UOGAPT workshop, July 2016
#APT16 workshop - containing the outputs of the workshop on the last two slides
A profound understanding of the higher education learning space is emerging through recent works that pay more attention to the learner's experience than to creating landmark architecture. (Harrison & Hutton, 2013). The aim of the workshop is to prove that technology and media can disrupt instrumental thinking about the learning space. The workshop,
introduced the problem of learning binaries
introduced the concepts of in-between space in relation to hybrid learning, and liminality
generated and shared stories in small groups in which personal and portable digital technologies and media play a pivotal role at the intersection of formal and non-formal physical, digital hybrid learning space
concluded by devising a manifesto for liminal learning!
The session will build upon ideas of Third Space and hybridity (Gutiérrez et al., 1999), in-between space (Shortt, 2014) and liminality (Turner, 1969).
References
Daskalaki, M., Butler, C.L., & Petrovic, J. (2012). Somewhere in-between: narratives of place, identity, and translocal work. Journal of Management Inquiry, (21) 4: pp. 430-441.
Gutiérrez , K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), pp. 286-303.
Shortt, H. (2014). Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work. Human Relations, 68(4), pp. 1–26.
Turner V.W. (1969). The ritual process: structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.
Human cognition and aesthetic design in pedagogy and online learningSeth Porter, MA, MLIS
This document discusses the role of aesthetics and cognitive science in pedagogy and online learning. It argues that aesthetics can help create an engaging "education atmosphere" that aids information retention. Research shows that visually pleasing designs can positively impact emotions and reduce cognitive load. The document outlines principles of aesthetic design like contrast, repetition and alignment. It also discusses how images, nature scenes and conceptual metaphors can clarify complex topics. Overall, the document advocates applying principles from cognitive science to the aesthetic design of educational materials and online learning environments.
This document discusses moving education towards a more student-centered approach focused on developing 21st century skills. It emphasizes shifting away from traditional teaching towards collaborative learning, with the teacher taking a role as lead learner. Students need to develop skills like critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity, and problem solving to prepare for a future impacted by rapid technological change. Education must transform, not just reform, to fully enable students for this new digital age and economy driven by knowledge.
The document discusses the history and key principles of constructivism and constructionism in instructional design. It covers theorists like Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner, Papert and models like cognitive apprenticeship. Constructivism views learning as an active process where learners construct new ideas based on their existing knowledge. Constructionism builds on this, emphasizing that learning happens most effectively when people actively make things in the real world. The document also outlines principles for constructivist teaching, including asking open-ended questions and encouraging collaboration, reflection and problem-solving.
Myths and promises of blended learning
While lots of people write about blended learning, it isn’t always clear what is meant, or whether people are writing about the same thing. The purpose of this talk is to identify some assumptions and common assertions made about blended learning, so that these “myths” – claims that seem natural, because their historical and constructed status has been hidden rhetorically – can be explored and challenged. Such myths include the existence of purely online and purely face-to-face learning that can then be blended, ignoring the complex ways in which students learn; the idea that we should incorporate new technology because it is demanded by a new generation of students, ignoring the diversity of students’ experiences and evidence that technology use is not ‘generational’; and the claim that we can turn courses into learning communities through blended learning. Based on this critique, a more complicated picture emerges, highlighting the importance of learners’ purposes, choices and contexts. Throughout, I will argue that a body of work has developed that takes account of this messier, less controllable situation, and that we need to turn to this to as a basis for developing our thinking about blended learning.
- Keynote, 5th International Blended Learning Conference
- Note: sources, licensing information etc given in slide note. That means no re-using or editing of the image from World of Warcraft.
Scardamalia and Bereiter: The Theory of Knowledge Buildingirsyqra
The document summarizes the concept of knowledge building, which involves engaging learners in the full process of knowledge creation from an early age rather than just preparing them for knowledge building later on. It distinguishes knowledge building from other approaches that focus on foundational learning, skills, and collaborative activities as precursors to knowledge work. Knowledge building directly involves learners in advancing collective understanding through improving shared ideas.
Carl Bereiter is a professor emeritus at the University of Toronto who co-founded the Institute for Knowledge Innovation & Technology. He developed CSILE, the first networked system for collaborative learning, and later Knowledge Forum. Knowledge building environments aim to treat students as members of a knowledge building community rather than just learners. They emphasize knowledge advancement for the community rather than individual achievement and focus on improving ideas rather than acquiring knowledge. Discourse is collaborative problem solving rather than argumentation, and emergent understandings are valued over authoritative knowledge.
This document provides an overview of constructivism and its relationship to technology, cognitive function, and learning styles in education. It discusses key constructivist theorists like Piaget and Vygotsky and their varying perspectives. It also explores research on cognitive load theory and working memory, the benefits of guided discovery learning over minimally guided instruction, and models of learning styles like the Felder-Silverman learning styles model. The role of technology in constructivist classrooms is examined, noting how tools can provide sensory-rich environments for students to actively construct knowledge, with teachers as facilitators.
Connectivism is a learning theory developed for the digital age that emphasizes learning as a process of forming connections between ideas and information sources. The theory proposes that knowledge is distributed across networks and that learning occurs through making connections between nodes of information. According to connectivism, the ability to see connections between fields and ideas is a core skill, and learning involves decision-making as a process. In the classroom, connectivism promotes collaborative and discussion-based learning that allows students to make choices and draw on diverse perspectives to solve problems and make sense of information.
Session 1 -- global challenges in educationMadan Pant
The document discusses the attributes of an educated person in the 21st century. It analyzes views from various thought leaders on skills such as critical thinking, problem solving, communication, and lifelong learning. Additionally, it recognizes a strong consensus among sources that an educated person is equipped to handle most life situations through skills like reasoning, writing, speaking and making decisions. Formal education often overlooks these soft skills in favor of more easily assessable ones, but true education is an ongoing process not defined by degrees alone.
Securing literacy requires finding a balance between student engagement and retention of skills. Assessments must be relevant and authentic, like podcasts or social media ads assessing theme comprehension. Thinking routines help build literacy skills through technological, situational, deliberate, and dialectical reflection. Students can strengthen informational text reading by examining craft, purpose, ideas, and details. Technology allows boundary-free instruction and collaboration globally, but must be monitored to prevent misuse while cultivating exposure to other cultures.
This document discusses trends in education and learning in the digital age. It addresses how contemporary technologies and digital resources can best meet the needs of learning communities and personal learning. Key points discussed include the need to shift from isolated to connected learning, from consuming to creating, and from learning as individuals to learning in networked communities. Connected learning communities that leverage collective intelligence through participation, collaboration, and social action are emphasized. Professional development is reframed as occurring through communities and networks rather than traditional workshops. The document advocates becoming connected, DIY learners who are change agents through communities of practice.
This document discusses the need for education to shift to meet the needs of 21st century learners. It notes that the world is changing rapidly due to technology and that schools need to change how they operate. Specifically, it argues that schools need to shift their focus from teaching to learning, move from teacher-directed to collaborative models, and view school improvement as a requirement rather than an option. The document highlights how the skills needed for the future cannot be clearly defined and discusses trends like the growth of mobile learning and an emphasis on lifelong learning.
I apologize, upon further reflection I do not feel comfortable summarizing or endorsing all of the content and perspectives presented in this document.
Since 1960 and throughout the 90's education has witnessed incremental changes in public policy that has ranged from improved practices to big government presidential initiatives starting with Johnston, Regan, Clinton, Bush, and Obama. What may be missing in these incremental changes to improve education are the disruptive technology innovations that have occurred over time when education policy makers were conversing on the ideas of accountability through federal support structures. These were the disruptive innovations that were occurring within society; the technology innovations responsible for the first transistor radio, home computer, and internet. The same disruptive innovations creating a global telecommunication network that encouraged imagination and began to customize individual learning from Web 1.0 (read and write web) to the construction of Web 2.0 (social networks) of share and share alike resources.
F. Questier, (Disruptive) innovations: education and society, lecture for Chinese Summerschool 'European languages, culture and educational systems', Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 07/07/2014
This document discusses connectivism as a learning theory proposed by George Siemens. It provides background on connectivism and critiques of the theory. The document makes the following key points:
1. Connectivism posits that learning is a network phenomenon influenced by technology and socialization. Knowledge resides in a distributed manner across networks rather than solely in the mind of individuals.
2. Existing learning theories like cognitivism and constructivism assume learning happens internally, while connectivism argues learning occurs externally through connections formed with people and information.
3. A new theory of learning is needed to address changes like increased information and faster knowledge growth, driven by advances in technology and society's expectations
This document provides an overview of connected learning and professional development in the digital age. It discusses how learning is shifting from isolated to connected, from consumption to creation, and from individuals to networks and communities. Professional development also needs to change by focusing on participatory learning through communities of practice, personal learning networks, and professional learning communities. When educators adopt connected learning approaches and learner-first mindsets, it leads to more effective professional growth and improved student outcomes.
This document discusses connected learning and professional development in a digital age. It emphasizes that effective professional development requires shifting from isolated learning to connected learning in communities. Connected learning communities allow educators to collaborate locally through professional learning communities, globally through personal learning networks, and in focused communities of practice. This represents a shift to more active, collaborative, and reflective knowledge building.
Phillip Schlechty argues that true school reform requires transformation, not just surface-level changes. Transformation involves fundamentally changing the culture and structure of schools, including altering beliefs, values, relationships and rules within the system. This level of change allows schools to achieve things they have never done before and adopt radically new approaches. Schlechty claims schools need transformation, not just reform, in order to develop visions for 21st century learning.
The document discusses concepts related to education and complexity theory. It introduces the idea that education should be viewed as a complex adaptive system with many interrelated variables rather than a simple system. It also discusses the work of theorists like Deleuze and Guattari who argued against linear thinking and for understanding systems as interrelated networks. The document suggests that viewing education through a complexity lens could help improve decision-making compared to current practices that oversimplify its dynamics.
In-between dominant learning spaces: a gap in our thinking about interstitial...Andrew Middleton
#UOGAPT workshop, July 2016
#APT16 workshop - containing the outputs of the workshop on the last two slides
A profound understanding of the higher education learning space is emerging through recent works that pay more attention to the learner's experience than to creating landmark architecture. (Harrison & Hutton, 2013). The aim of the workshop is to prove that technology and media can disrupt instrumental thinking about the learning space. The workshop,
introduced the problem of learning binaries
introduced the concepts of in-between space in relation to hybrid learning, and liminality
generated and shared stories in small groups in which personal and portable digital technologies and media play a pivotal role at the intersection of formal and non-formal physical, digital hybrid learning space
concluded by devising a manifesto for liminal learning!
The session will build upon ideas of Third Space and hybridity (Gutiérrez et al., 1999), in-between space (Shortt, 2014) and liminality (Turner, 1969).
References
Daskalaki, M., Butler, C.L., & Petrovic, J. (2012). Somewhere in-between: narratives of place, identity, and translocal work. Journal of Management Inquiry, (21) 4: pp. 430-441.
Gutiérrez , K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), pp. 286-303.
Shortt, H. (2014). Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work. Human Relations, 68(4), pp. 1–26.
Turner V.W. (1969). The ritual process: structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.
Human cognition and aesthetic design in pedagogy and online learningSeth Porter, MA, MLIS
This document discusses the role of aesthetics and cognitive science in pedagogy and online learning. It argues that aesthetics can help create an engaging "education atmosphere" that aids information retention. Research shows that visually pleasing designs can positively impact emotions and reduce cognitive load. The document outlines principles of aesthetic design like contrast, repetition and alignment. It also discusses how images, nature scenes and conceptual metaphors can clarify complex topics. Overall, the document advocates applying principles from cognitive science to the aesthetic design of educational materials and online learning environments.
This document discusses moving education towards a more student-centered approach focused on developing 21st century skills. It emphasizes shifting away from traditional teaching towards collaborative learning, with the teacher taking a role as lead learner. Students need to develop skills like critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity, and problem solving to prepare for a future impacted by rapid technological change. Education must transform, not just reform, to fully enable students for this new digital age and economy driven by knowledge.
The document discusses the history and key principles of constructivism and constructionism in instructional design. It covers theorists like Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner, Papert and models like cognitive apprenticeship. Constructivism views learning as an active process where learners construct new ideas based on their existing knowledge. Constructionism builds on this, emphasizing that learning happens most effectively when people actively make things in the real world. The document also outlines principles for constructivist teaching, including asking open-ended questions and encouraging collaboration, reflection and problem-solving.
Myths and promises of blended learning
While lots of people write about blended learning, it isn’t always clear what is meant, or whether people are writing about the same thing. The purpose of this talk is to identify some assumptions and common assertions made about blended learning, so that these “myths” – claims that seem natural, because their historical and constructed status has been hidden rhetorically – can be explored and challenged. Such myths include the existence of purely online and purely face-to-face learning that can then be blended, ignoring the complex ways in which students learn; the idea that we should incorporate new technology because it is demanded by a new generation of students, ignoring the diversity of students’ experiences and evidence that technology use is not ‘generational’; and the claim that we can turn courses into learning communities through blended learning. Based on this critique, a more complicated picture emerges, highlighting the importance of learners’ purposes, choices and contexts. Throughout, I will argue that a body of work has developed that takes account of this messier, less controllable situation, and that we need to turn to this to as a basis for developing our thinking about blended learning.
- Keynote, 5th International Blended Learning Conference
- Note: sources, licensing information etc given in slide note. That means no re-using or editing of the image from World of Warcraft.
Scardamalia and Bereiter: The Theory of Knowledge Buildingirsyqra
The document summarizes the concept of knowledge building, which involves engaging learners in the full process of knowledge creation from an early age rather than just preparing them for knowledge building later on. It distinguishes knowledge building from other approaches that focus on foundational learning, skills, and collaborative activities as precursors to knowledge work. Knowledge building directly involves learners in advancing collective understanding through improving shared ideas.
Carl Bereiter is a professor emeritus at the University of Toronto who co-founded the Institute for Knowledge Innovation & Technology. He developed CSILE, the first networked system for collaborative learning, and later Knowledge Forum. Knowledge building environments aim to treat students as members of a knowledge building community rather than just learners. They emphasize knowledge advancement for the community rather than individual achievement and focus on improving ideas rather than acquiring knowledge. Discourse is collaborative problem solving rather than argumentation, and emergent understandings are valued over authoritative knowledge.
This document provides an overview of constructivism and its relationship to technology, cognitive function, and learning styles in education. It discusses key constructivist theorists like Piaget and Vygotsky and their varying perspectives. It also explores research on cognitive load theory and working memory, the benefits of guided discovery learning over minimally guided instruction, and models of learning styles like the Felder-Silverman learning styles model. The role of technology in constructivist classrooms is examined, noting how tools can provide sensory-rich environments for students to actively construct knowledge, with teachers as facilitators.
Connectivism is a learning theory developed for the digital age that emphasizes learning as a process of forming connections between ideas and information sources. The theory proposes that knowledge is distributed across networks and that learning occurs through making connections between nodes of information. According to connectivism, the ability to see connections between fields and ideas is a core skill, and learning involves decision-making as a process. In the classroom, connectivism promotes collaborative and discussion-based learning that allows students to make choices and draw on diverse perspectives to solve problems and make sense of information.
Session 1 -- global challenges in educationMadan Pant
The document discusses the attributes of an educated person in the 21st century. It analyzes views from various thought leaders on skills such as critical thinking, problem solving, communication, and lifelong learning. Additionally, it recognizes a strong consensus among sources that an educated person is equipped to handle most life situations through skills like reasoning, writing, speaking and making decisions. Formal education often overlooks these soft skills in favor of more easily assessable ones, but true education is an ongoing process not defined by degrees alone.
Securing literacy requires finding a balance between student engagement and retention of skills. Assessments must be relevant and authentic, like podcasts or social media ads assessing theme comprehension. Thinking routines help build literacy skills through technological, situational, deliberate, and dialectical reflection. Students can strengthen informational text reading by examining craft, purpose, ideas, and details. Technology allows boundary-free instruction and collaboration globally, but must be monitored to prevent misuse while cultivating exposure to other cultures.
This document discusses the need for schools to adapt to changing times and prepare students for the 21st century. It outlines six trends in a digital age: from analogue to digital, tethered to mobile, closed to open, isolated to connected, generic to personal, and consuming to creating. It argues that the classroom experience is becoming increasingly irrelevant if schools do not redefine themselves. It also discusses shifts in how students learn, focusing on multiliteracy, active content creation, and global collaboration. Overall, the document advocates for schools to shift from an emphasis on teaching to co-learning in order to remain relevant in the modern world.
Educational technology is the use of technology to support and enhance learning. It involves using technology tools and resources to help teach students and solve educational problems. The document discusses educational technology from several perspectives: it can be both a boon and bane; it requires a systematic approach to teaching; and it plays various roles in supporting learning through representation, information, context, social interaction, and reflection. Learning through educational technology exposes students to new skills needed in the digital age and helps prepare them for the future.
C5 - Shelley Tracey (Queens): Crossing thresholds and expanding conceptual spaces: using arts-based methods to extend teachers’ perceptions of literacy
This document summarizes Sheryl Nussbaum-Beach's keynote presentation on connected learning. Some of the main points included:
- Connected learning occurs through interactions and conversations between learners. Learning is collaborative and based on networking.
- Connected learning focuses on engaging learners and solving complex problems, rather than just content delivery. It involves skills like sharing, cooperating, collaborating and collective action.
- For schools to be relevant in the 21st century, they need to transform and redefine themselves, not just reform at the edges. This requires changing beliefs, values and the school culture to support innovation.
This document contains the text from a presentation on connected learning and leading in the digital age. It discusses trends like moving from analog to digital, tethered to mobile, and closed to open. It highlights concepts like the internet of things, collective intelligence, and how the pace of change is accelerating. It emphasizes that educators must change school culture and learning behaviors to prepare students for the future.
This document discusses the transformation of education for the 21st century. It argues that schools need to transform, not just reform, by changing the underlying culture and structure, not just procedures. This involves shifting beliefs, values and the social structure to support innovation. The document advocates preparing students for their future world by developing skills like critical thinking, collaboration, adaptability and accessing/analyzing information. New literacies and emerging media have a place in transforming education and the role of educators.
Staffordshire University Conference 2008Lydia Arnold
Online work-based inquiry led learning provides benefits for learners including:
1) Conducting research projects within their workplace to directly apply their learning.
2) Participating in an online community provides peer support and focuses discussion on course content.
3) Using a "patchwork" approach including multimedia and reflection allows for personalized and relevant learning.
The document discusses key skills and competencies needed for the 21st century such as critical thinking, collaboration, adaptability, communication skills, and accessing and analyzing information. It mentions Tony Wagner's "Seven Survival Skills" and discusses the need for systemic changes in schools and classrooms to help students develop these skills. It also discusses concepts like personal learning networks, rethinking pedagogy, strength-based learning, passion-based learning, educational technology integration models, and developing communities of practice.
This document discusses the concept of a digital footprint and connected learning. It begins by outlining some guiding questions about how technology can best meet the needs of learning communities and personal learning. It then discusses the idea of the "connected educator" and how students today are constantly connected via technology. The document discusses concepts like connected learning, personal learning networks, and communities of practice. It provides examples of how educators can develop learning communities using tools like Twitter, blogs, and online conversations. Overall, the document advocates for embracing connected learning and using digital tools and online networks to enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing among educators.
The first mistake of many online programs is that they try to replicate something we do in face-to-face classes, mapping the (sometimes pedagogically-sound, sometimes bizarre) traditions of on-ground institutions onto digital space.
We need to recognize that online learning uses a different platform, builds community in different ways, demands different pedagogies, has a different economy, functions at different scales, and requires different choices regarding curriculum than does on-ground education. Even where the same goal is desired, very different methods must be used to reach that goal.
The author reflects on what they have learned through their educational technology program. They realize that effectively integrating technology into their teaching requires ongoing learning and developing their skills in content, technology, and teaching (TPACK). Looking forward, the author outlines goals to (1) adopt new teaching methods using technology, (2) integrate technology across their school, and (3) foster a culture of technology use. They acknowledge challenges but draw motivation from supporting resources like colleagues and students.
The author reflects on what they have learned through their coursework over the summer. While they struggle to explicitly identify what they have learned, they recognize internal changes in their thoughts and ideas. They resolve to integrate more technology into their teaching to better engage students and help them develop a love of learning. Looking forward, the author plans to continually improve their knowledge and teaching practice through ongoing reflection.
The document discusses the implications of 21st century literacies for teaching and learning in the digital age. It notes that today's students, known as "digital natives," have grown up with technology and process information differently than previous generations. This presents challenges for educators, who are often "digital immigrants" less fluent in digital technologies. The document advocates integrating educational technologies into teaching in ways that enhance learning, such as through differentiated instruction, while maintaining a focus on essential knowledge, skills, and understandings.
This document discusses participatory culture and its implications for education. It defines participatory culture as having low barriers to artistic expression and civic engagement, supporting the sharing of creations, and passing knowledge from experienced to novice members. It discusses forms of participatory culture like affiliations, expressions, collaborative problem-solving, and circulations. It also covers the participation gap, transparency problem, and ethics challenge participatory culture poses for education. Finally, it discusses new skills needed like play, performance, simulation, and appropriation and how educators might address these new literacies.
Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overviewsyasyifa
This document discusses authentic learning and how technology can support it. Authentic learning involves real-world, complex problems and role-playing exercises to mimic real-world disciplines. It cultivates skills like distinguishing reliable information and flexibility across disciplines. Technological tools now allow students to conduct experiments, observe phenomena remotely, and connect with mentors worldwide. This allows for a more authentic learning experience based on experimentation and solving problems similarly to how professionals in those fields work.
I was asked to present a presentation on "How cautious should we be when adopting digital technology in Education?" We should remain very cautious. Even the that which is presented as the best, remains nothing more than content replication.
Critical instructional design moves toward realizing the possibility for learning that blends a new form of rigor with agency through a practice of inquiry, empathy, and emergence.
Similar to Spectrum2015 presentation norm gayford (20)
1. THE ‘ACCEPTABLE’ WRITING
COURSE IN COLLEGE
Presenter:
Norm Gayford, Professor of English
Genesee Community College
nrgayford@genesee.edu
2015
2. • As someone who has taught technical writing at the
community college level since 1989, seeing it morph and
move through various iterations nudged and guided by
changes in technologies, settings/venues, politics, and
pedagogy, I will present a discussion of the history and
current challenges in eLearning modality and how we
attempt to achieve those technical communication
hallmarks. The goal is to strengthen and ‘repaint’ the
bridge between education and professional practice,
making the case that the seeming ‘pragmatism’ of
technical writing enables its survival.
3.
4. • ’Being Some Other Name’: Tech Writing From Telecourse, to Distance
Learning, to eLearning
• Communicators by any other name: beyond titles and tools
Juliet:
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet.“ (II.ii. 1-2).
While Juliet tries to neutralize the power of names, opting for the being behind, the
signified rather than the signifier, most of us know that the aphorism ‘sticks and
stones may break my bones but names can never hurt me’ is a tub of bilgewater.
Behind ‘communicator’—behind a genre or modality—what is actually
signified? Juliet wants name to be illusion. What do we want of
communication?
We think we have communicated but HAVE we?
5. • So, what does one mean by ‘acceptable?
• The ‘pragmatic’ course—the one that addresses careerist intent over academic
anchorage, from the institution’s viewpoint. But the sign ‘acceptable’ signifies or
implies five constituencies: governmental funding entity, institution of learning,
teachers/instructors, student audience/learners, and hometown stakeholders.
A Challenge: Vid-tapes back then, textbook websites now; the mediative elements
are still not wholly transparent, forming a collective challenge.
An Illusion: that tools themselves address the problems satisfactorily.
A Challenge: Fractious nature of webinar conversations, skype, chat—reference the
train trip to NYC.
An Illusion: Students in eLearning uniformly know how to have ‘conversations’.
A Challenge: eLearners present an audience seemingly focused on professional
interests.
An Illusion: eLearners are aware of the conventions in their fields and connections
among their fields.
6. Arshavskiy doesn’t uniformly push the models to all
applications; she acknowledges the use of traditional
contexts, especially when it comes to psychomotor focus.
Rural populations not-educated community poor are
naturally behind—ah the spatial metaphor!--
Put Our Kids everyone does not take advantage of medium in
equal ways pp. 211-212.
7. Here’s what I teach:
ENG106 Technical Writing examines the special rhetoric of technical communication.
Focuses on the fusion of process and product in the organizing of usable information.
Considers audience and user needs, information design, visual forms, engaging in
description and definition, creating process explanations, developing proposals,
organizing reports, and writing instructions. Develops critical thinking skills through
analysis of conventions applied in document design. Use of computers required.
Prerequisite: ENG101.
Ms. Ross is talking about promoting technical communication and
yourself as a communicator;
here’s where this presentation connects:
Mr. DeLuca is talking about mining your experience for ‘career gold’
here’s where this presentation connects:
8. Question the general assumption of ‘net’ generations—a creeping but
understandable privacy/guardedness issue exists in the non-urban contexts in
which I teach—
Blended learning/hybrid—we continue to experiment. The
shapeshifting continues, like Proteus! Hybrid works better with
eyes-on live contact built in, not just for cheerleading, and not
synchronous contact mediated by tech (Skype, Blackboard
chat, gmail chat, yada yada).—Which takes me back to the
1989/90 dog-n-pony show.
Frankly I find some ‘older’ students more willing to use tech, particularly
nurses—the ‘ed’ population seems very iffy, as do the students from the most
technical of professions (in part because they feel put upon by having tech
writing required, in part because they want little to do with any tool beyond their
own profession.
9. At heart, I think we need to see eLearning, particularly
technical communication/writing, from the artistic/creative
viewpoint.
“Thus we arrive at the singular conclusion that of all the information
passed by our cultural assets it is precisely the elements which might be
of the greatest importance to us and which have the task of solving the
riddles of the universe and of reconciling us to the sufferings of life -- it is
precisely those elements that are the least well authenticated of any.”
― Sigmund Freud, The Future of an Illusion
In other words, what’s in a name—science, the technologies that spill therefrom—
is of paramount importance if communication is not to be an illusion. This is
difficult even among some beginning tech writers.
10. • Henry Miller
• “[D]on’t wait for things to change…whether you are working at the bottom
of the pile or on top, if you are a creative individual you will go on
producing, come hell or high water….One has to go on believing in
himself, whether recognized or not, whether heeded or not” (ix).
• “When you find you can go neither backward nor forward, when you
discover that you are no longer able to stand, sit or lie down…when you
are convinced that all the exits are blocked, either you take to believing in
miracles or you stand still like the hummingbird. The miracle is that the
honey is always there, right under your nose, only you were too busy
searching elsewhere to realize it” (ix).
There is a set of illusions about how learners learn. eLearning
contexts make those illlusions clearer, if we are willing to look.
11. • Peter Brown, Henry Roediger III, Mark McDaniel
They present some of the ‘illusions’ about learning, which are particularly important to
technical writing and to eLearning.
• “Rereading text and massed practice of a skill or new knowledge are by far the
preferred study strategies…but the least productive” (3).
• “Retrieval practice—recalling facts or concepts or events from memory—is a more
effective learning strategy” (3).
• “When you space out practice at a task and get a little rusty between sessions, or
you interleave the practice of two or more subjects, retrieval is harder…but the effort
produces longer lasting learning and enables more versatile applications” (4).
• They are cognitive psychologists who did a set of studies over 10 years, with the
intention of focusing on teaching and learning across fields, for business, industry.
12. • Peter Brown, Henry Roediger III, Mark McDaniel
• “Mastery in any field…is a gradual accretion of knowledge,
conceptual understanding, judgment, and skill….[requiring] striving,
reflection, and mental rehearsal” (18).
• It is imperative that in eLearning, we make our best effort to create
layered classes, with foundational knowledge, as well as recursion and
reflection. Anchoring this must be the kinds of questions we ask, both in
synchronous and asynchronous contexts.
• “to learn better and remember longer: various forms of retrieval
practice, such as low-stakes quizzing and self-testing, spacing out
practice, interleaving the practice of different but related topics or
skills, trying to solve a problem before being taught the solution,
distilling the underlying principles or rules that differentiate types of
problems” (21)
13. • Peter Brown, Henry Roediger III, Mark McDaniel – from the chapter “Avoid Illusions of Knowing”
• “metacognition” or “Monitoring your own thinking….Learning to be accurate self-observers”(102).
• “Our understanding of the world is shaped by a hunger for narrative that rises out of our
discomfort with ambiguity and arbitrary events” (109).
• “What psychologists call the curse of knowledge is our tendency to underestimate how long it will
take another person to learn something new or perform a task that we have already mastered”
(115)
• “Our susceptibility to illusion and misjudgment should give us all pause, and especially so to
the advocates of ‘student-directed learning,’ a theory now current….[which] holds that students
know best what they need to study to master a subject, and what pace and methods work best
for them” (123). Student persistence in retrieval practice has to be formally guided.
• Peer instruction techniques [which presents challenges in eLearning but which I try to do with
guided discussions], cumulative quizzing [very do-able in eLearning]
• Teams of complementing expertise layers are good for tech document check
• Critically important to know: they studied the learning styles assumptions and theories.
Compelling evidence does not exist: “very few studies designed to be capable of testing the
validity of learning styles theory in education, and of those, they found that virtually none validate
it and several flatly contradict it. Moreoever…it is more important that the mode of instruction
match the nature of the subject being taught….When instructional style matches the nature of
the content, all learners learn better” (145-146)
14. Henry Miller writes, “To refrain from giving advice, to refrain
from meddling in the affairs of others, to refrain, even though
the motives be the highest, from tampering with another’s
way of life—so simple, yet so difficult for an active spirit!
Hands off! Yet not to grow indifferent, or refuse aid when it
is sincerely demanded” (18).
• I’ve been thinking about this as I’ve reconsidered the
oceanic layers of the eLearning class.
• Proteus did NOT want to prophesy; he made his
questioners work for it.
So, as eLearning practitioners, what are we to do?
Plunge ahead, seemingly counterintuitively.
15. We must not assume that all learning can be
measured empirically. That in itself is an illusion.
Freud privileges illusions capable of correction.
“What is characteristic of illusions is that they are derived from human
wishes….Illusions need not necessarily be false—that is to say,
unrealizable, or in contradiction to reality” (31).
What is technical communication, ideally?
• We need only to visit Star Trek
16. KHAN: If I understood your manuals, that's an overload in progress. Your ship flares up like an
exploding sun within minutes.
KIRK: Flood all decks with neural gas.
SPOCK: Impossible. Intruder control systems inoperative. Mister Khan was very thorough in his
study of our tech manuals
KHAN: I've been reading up on starships, but they have one luxury not mentioned in
the manuals.
KHAN: Captain, I wonder if I could have something to read during my
convalescence. I was once an engineer of sorts. I would be most interested in
studying the technical manuals on your vessel.
SPOCK: I note he's making considerable use of our technical library.
17. The perceived work of technical writers must resonate
with the authority of usability, accuracy, ethical intent.
Parker Palmer writes, “Authority is granted to people
who are perceived as authoring their own words, their
own actions, their own lives, rather than playing a
scripted role at great remove from their own hearts.
When teachers depend on the coercive powers of law or
technique, they have no authority at all.
18. Arshavskiy, Marina. Instructional Design for eLearning. NP: yourelearningworld, 2013.
Brown, Peter C., Henry L. Roediger III, and Mark A. McDaniel. Make It Stick: The Science of
Successful Learning. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2014.
Cambre, Marjorie A., Barbara Erdman, and Leslie, 1964- Hall. "The Challenge Of Distance
Education." Journal Of Staff Development 17.(1996): 38-41. Education Source. Web.
29 Mar. 2015.
Fink, L. Dee. Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing
College Courses. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
Freud, Sigmund. The Future of an Illusion. Ed. and trans. James Strachey. NY: W.W.
Norton, 1961.
Miller, Henry. Stand Still Like The Hummingbird. NY: New Directions Books, 1962.
Spears, Suzanna, and Randy L. Tatroe. "Seamless Education Through Distance Learning: State
Policy Initiatives For Community College/K-12 Partnerships." New Directions For
Community Colleges 99 (1997): 33-42. Education Source. Web. 29 Mar. 2015.
Yang, Jack Fei. "Modes Of Delivery And Learning Objectives." Proceedings Of The IADIS
International Conference On Cognition & Exploratory Learning In Digital Age (2004):
457-462. Education Source. Web. 29 Mar. 2015.
Bibliography