This presentation was made for the subject of computer architecture and organisation for the understanding of evolution of microprocessors and their configurations
This presentation was made for the subject of computer architecture and organisation for the understanding of evolution of microprocessors and their configurations
this presentation is a great to deliver in classrooms, stage or also can be used to deliver lecture on "Evolution of processor".
it is also very helpful to learn about microprocessor, directly we can say its a self pack containing all about microprocessor.
this ppt contains evolution not only on the basis of generations but also on the basis of their invention.
must gothrough it
Presentation explain the difference between Intel i3, i5 and i7 processors. One would be able to choose the processor selection once he understand the basic difference between them.
A processor is multipurpose, programmable device that read binary instructions from memory, accepts binary data as input and processes data according to that instruction, and provides results as output. It can be viewed as data processing unit of a computer. It has computing and decision-making capability
this presentation is a great to deliver in classrooms, stage or also can be used to deliver lecture on "Evolution of processor".
it is also very helpful to learn about microprocessor, directly we can say its a self pack containing all about microprocessor.
this ppt contains evolution not only on the basis of generations but also on the basis of their invention.
must gothrough it
Presentation explain the difference between Intel i3, i5 and i7 processors. One would be able to choose the processor selection once he understand the basic difference between them.
A processor is multipurpose, programmable device that read binary instructions from memory, accepts binary data as input and processes data according to that instruction, and provides results as output. It can be viewed as data processing unit of a computer. It has computing and decision-making capability
Succession “Losers”: What Happens to Executives Passed Over for the CEO Job?
By David F. Larcker, Stephen A. Miles, and Brian Tayan
Stanford Closer Look Series
Overview:
Shareholders pay considerable attention to the choice of executive selected as the new CEO whenever a change in leadership takes place. However, without an inside look at the leading candidates to assume the CEO role, it is difficult for shareholders to tell whether the board has made the correct choice. In this Closer Look, we examine CEO succession events among the largest 100 companies over a ten-year period to determine what happens to the executives who were not selected (i.e., the “succession losers”) and how they perform relative to those who were selected (the “succession winners”).
We ask:
• Are the executives selected for the CEO role really better than those passed over?
• What are the implications for understanding the labor market for executive talent?
• Are differences in performance due to operating conditions or quality of available talent?
• Are boards better at identifying CEO talent than other research generally suggests?
On November 12, 2009, Intel Corp. gave Advanced MicroDevices (AMD).docxcarlibradley31429
On November 12, 2009, Intel Corp. gave Advanced Micro
Devices (AMD) $1.25 billion to settle a lawsuit AMD
filed against it in 2005. Intel’s CEO Paul Otellini said
he agreed to pay $1.25 billion to settle AMD’s lawsuit
because he no longer felt the “time and money [spent
fighting it] makes sense.”
1
AMD’s lawsuit accused Intel
of being a monopoly and of using its monopoly power to
unfairly keep computer companies from buying AMD’s
microprocessors. With about 70 percent of the market,
Intel Corp. is the world’s largest manufacturer of personal
computer (PC) “microprocessors”—also called
“computer chips,” “microchips,” or “processors”—tiny
electronic devices that serve as the “brain” of a personal
computer and carries out its basic operations. As
the world’s second largest maker of PC microprocessors,
AMD is Intel’s only real competitor, although it
holds only about 20 percent of the PC processor market.
It is difficult for other companies to get into the
business of making PC microprocessors because of
several “barriers to entry.” First, Intel and AMD hold
the patents for making the kind of microprocessors
almost all personal computers use. Second, it costs several
billion dollars to build facilities for making microprocessors.
Third, Intel and AMD are so big and experienced
that they can now make microprocessors for a lot less
than a new company could, so if a new company tried to
enter the market its prices would likely not be competitive
with Intel’s or AMD’s.
AMD was not the only one that had accused Intel of
using monopoly power to stifle competition. On May 5,
2009, the European Commission fined Intel a record $1.5
billion and said the company had used its monopoly power
to unfairly block AMD from the market. On November 4,
2009, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo sued
Intel for harming New York’s consumers by using its monopoly
power to keep computer makers from buying better
AMD microprocessors. In June, 2008, South Korea’s
Fair Trade Commission ruled that Intel had used its monopoly
power in violation of its antitrust laws. In 2005, Japan’s
Fair Trade Commission ruled that Intel had violated
Japanese antitrust laws by paying companies to buy all or
almost all of their processors exclusively from Intel.
230
THE MARKET AND BUSINESS
Explore
the
Concept
on
mythinkinglab.com
E
THICS IN THE
M
ARKETPLACE
231
Many of the activities Intel was being blamed for
originated in a strategic mistake the company made in
the late 1990s when it invested hundreds of millions of
dollars developing a new type of microprocessor that
would not use “x86 technology.” x86 technology consists
of certain instructions that are built into so-called
“x86 microprocessors.” All microprocessors must contain
“instructions” that allow them to “read” and run software
programs like games, word-processors, or web browsers.
Because all x86 microprocessors contain the same
instructions, the newest x86 microprocessors can generally
read and use the same data and pro.
Write a 7 page paper in APA format.The research paper should in.docxmayank272369
Write a 7 page paper in APA format.
The research paper should include the following sections. Discuss the competitors, future, and innovations with computing. Using the outline below:
Cover page
Introduction – (Thesis statement and Purpose of paper)
Background – Background and History on the concept
Discussion – Discuss current issues, innovation, and future use. Support the topic with any necessary sources. Be sure to include in-text citations.
Conclusion – Summary of main points
Theory in Action: IBM and the Attack of the Clones
In 1980, IBM was in a hurry to introduce a personal computer. When personal computers first began to emerge at the end of the 1970s, most of the major computer manufacturers considered it no more than a peculiar product for a hobbyist market. The idea that individuals would want personal computers on their desks seemed ludicrous. However, as total U.S. personal computer sales reached $1 billion, IBM began to worry that the personal computer market could actually turn out to be a significant computer market in which IBM had no share. To bring a personal computer to market quickly, IBM decided to use many off-the-shelf components from other vendors, including Intel's 8088 microprocessor and Microsoft's software. However, IBM was not worried about imitators because IBM's proprietary basic input/output system (BIOS), the computer code that linked the computer's hardware to its software, was protected by copyright. While other firms could copy the BIOS code, doing so would violate IBM's copyright and incur the legendary wrath of IBM's legal team. However, getting around IBM's copyright turned out not to be difficult. Copyright protected the written lines of code, but not the functions those codes produced. Compaq was able to reverse-engineer the BIOS in a matter of months without violating IBM's copyright. First, a team of Compaq programmers documented every function the IBM computer would perform in response to a given command, without recording the code that performed the function. This list of functions was then given to another team of “virgin” programmers (programmers who were able to prove that they had never been exposed to IBM's BIOS code).a These programmers went through the list of functions and wrote code to create identical functions. The result was a new BIOS that acted just like an IBM BIOS but did not violate its copyright. Compaq sold a record-breaking 47,000 IBM-compatible computers in its first year, and other clones were quick to follow.
a R. Cringely, Accidental Empires (New York: HarperCollins, 1992).
Writ
e a 7 page paper in APA format.
The research paper should include the following sections. Discuss the competitors, future, and
innovations with computing.
Using the outline below:
Cover page
Introduction
–
(Thesis
statement and Purpose of paper)
Background
–
Background and History on the concept
Discussion
–
Discuss current issues, innovation, and future use. Support the to ...
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and SalesLaura Byrne
Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes?
All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
2. Processor Manufacturers
4 major companies make microcomputer processor
Namely:
1. Intel
2. AMD(Advanced Micro Devices)
3. Freescale Semiconductors Inc.: a subsidiary of
Motorola Inc.
4.IBM
3. Intel
Founded in 1968 by 3 engineers, Robert Noyce, Gordon
Moore and Andy Grove who left Fairchild Semiconductor.
Both Intel and AMD were founded by engineers who left
Fairchild Semiconductor.
Named from the words Integrated Electronics.
1970s early developer of SRAM and DRAM products. Until
the IBM PC came in 1981, Intel heavily depended on
memory products.
But due to Japanese practice undercutting competition by
underpricing same quality products at 10-20% lower prices,
In mid-1980s Intel under leadership of Andy Grove decided
to let go off memory business.
4. Intel cont.
In the 1990s became household name due to Pentium
family of processors.
Intel Inside ad campaign became textbook example of
Ingredient Marketing whereas a part or ingredient is
marketed rather than the whole products. Only artificial
sweetener NutraSweet did active ingredient marketing on
this scale before.
2 other landmark decisions by Intel that propelled Intel
towards industry-leading position under the leadership of
Andy Grove:
1. Single sourcing manufacturing. In the 1980s
semiconductor manufacturing was so unreliable that
vendors demanded multiple suppliers for a single products.
5. Intel cont.
1st Landmark Decision: Single sourcing all processor starting
from 80386. Intel convinced customers i.e. PC clone
manufactures that it can provide the same reliability by
manufacturing at different locations rather than they going to
different processor suppliers. So Intel chose 3 locations: Santa
Clara, California, Hillsboro, Oregon and Chandler, a suburb of
Phoenix, Arizona for both design and manufacturing.
2nd Landmark decision: Stop licensing products to
competitors such as AMD and Zilog.
In the 1990s Apple also benefited from such practices. Apple made
300 different products and licensed products to other competitors.
But Steve Jobs came on board in 1997, he discontinued many
product lines such as camera, printer etc. and focused on few
product lines and discontinued the practice of licensing to
competitors
6. Intel cont.
Other questionable practices that helped Intel gain its
monopolistic market position.
1.Practice of spending huge sums on lawsuits even if Intel
loses. Intel burdens other parties with huge legal bills which
they seldom recovers from.
2. practice of maintaining a list of PC manufacturers called
“list of Preferred Customers”: If you are a favored customer
by Intel, once a new processor is launched that customer
gets the first supply of processors. If he is not in the list, if he
is deemed to be antagonistic to Intel, then Intel delivers the
products in a delayed timing say 3 to 6 months later. As
product life cycle in computer industry is very short, when
the PC manufacturer gets the processor, its too late.
7. Notable processors by Intel
Early processors 4004,8008,8080 were not major success.
First processor 4004 was for Japanese calculator maker Busicom.
Year 1978: 8086 processor saw the marketing campaign named
Operation Crush which wanted to grab as many customers as
possible. IBM was a notable win. IBM PC introduced in 1981 adopted
this processor.
1982: Intel introduced 80286, IBM used it in IBM PC/AT.
Compaq a successful PC Clone manufacturer adopted Intel
processors 80286,80386,
Compaq’s successful product Desktop Pro386 was based on 80386.
Compaq was a major revenue driver for both Intel and AMD.
8. 1989:80486 came, intended to bring a processor every 2
years.
1993: rather than naming 80586, Pentium name was
introduced because numbers were difficult to trademark.
Along with the Intel Inside campaign, the Incident called the
Intel Flaw when a professor found a floating point operation
flaw in Pentium processor. It was published in the
newspaper. Intel decided to replace all the purchased
processor. The recall cost $500 million to the balance sheet.
But people came to learn about the company.
9. Intel’s Systems Group started making motherboard.
Intel quickly became 3rd largest motherboard maker
capturing 15% market share.
Intel Architecture Lab group invented many of the
standards such as PCI,PCI Express, USB
2001: Santa Clara facility collaborated with HP to bring
a 64 bit server processor named Itanium. Itanium is still
in the market today.
2006: all Macs now will come with Intel processor.
10. 2008: Intel started to make solid state drive based on
flash memory.
2013: moving away from WINTEL to open source
supporting all OS
11. Vinod Dham was the designer behind Intel family. He
used a very practical approach to product design. He
approached software companies such as Microsoft and
Borland C++. what they needed in a processor. He
enlisted 147 features, few even Intel engineers did not
anticipate. This saved Intel from future revisions.
This is the same practice applied by Boeing when It
designed the Boeing 777. Boeing took advice from all
the leading airlines asking them what are the features
they seek in a jet plane
12. AMD
AMD was founded by Jerry Sanders who left Fairchild
Semiconductor in 1968. AMD was founded in 1969, 1 year
later Intel was founded in 1968.
AMD grew by strategic partnerships such as alliances, joint
ventures with other companies for talent, money, marketing.
In 1981, AMD had a deal with IBM to make processor for its
IBM PC as a second source to Intel. IBM wanted Intel’s x86
processor with the condition that AMD will also manufacture
the same processor.
In the same year, Intel and AMD went into an agreement
that each company will make products designed by others,
by exchanging the technology of any other products of equal
complexity.
13. Major Intel processors
Processor Prodcution period Clock
speed
Pentium 1993-1999 60-200 MHz
Pentium MMX 1996-1999 120-300 MHz
Atom(low power
processor netbook)
2008-2009 800-2.13 GHz
Celeron(budget PC) 1998-present 266MHz-3.6GHz
Pentium Pro 1995-1998 150-200MHz
Pentium II 1997-1999 233-450 MHz
Pentium III 1999-2003 450MHz-1.4GHZ
Xeon-server processor 1998-present 400MHz-4.4GHZ
Pentium IV 2000-2008 1.3GHz-3.8GHz
15. Thus AMD became a second-source manufacturer to Intel’s x86
processor. It started making its own clone processor of Intel x86
and named them am286,am386
Processors and graphics card are two large revenue drivers for
AMD. Graphics card business expanded after after the $5.4 billion
acquisition of ATI(Array Technologies Inc. in 2006, AMD has since
retired ATI brand in favor of AMD brand.
Acquisition of ATI saw a new approach called integrating CPU and
GPU(Graphical Process Unit) into single chip called Fusion. CP
AMD called it APU(accelerated Graphics Unit). Some of the CPU
functions were transferred from CPU to GPU such as floating point
operations.
AMD exited from its JV with Fujitsu to make flash memory in 2003.
The divested company is called Spansion today.
16. AMD
AMD Divested its manufacturing which is called Global
Foundries( a semiconductor manufacturing plant is called a
foundry or a fabrication plant in short fab.
So AMD is now a fabless semiconductor company. A fabless
firm is a virtual company which outsources its manufacturing
from other foundries.
SO today AMD only designs processor does not
manufacture.
Global Foundries is owned by Emirate of Abu Dhabi. Global
Foundries acquired Chartered Semiconductor Company of
Singapore for $3.9 billion, it received $1.5 billion from IBM to
run its New York plant.
17. Processors of AMD
AMD makes GPU(Graphics Processor Unit) of all 3 top
gaming console brands, namely Xbox by Microsoft,
PlayStation by Sony and Wii 2 by Nintendo.
Dell started making server with Opteron server
processor of AMD ending an exclusive deal with Intel
only server.
Major processor:
1.K5,K6,K7,K8, K10,K10.5 are families of processors
just like Intel’s Pentium I,II,III and IV.
18. Year 1996:AMD brought K5 as an answer to Pentium I but failed to
get market traction. K stands for Kryptonyte, the only substance that
can harm Superman, hinting at Intel as superman, 5 stands for 5th
generation of x86 processor
Year 1996: At this time AMD brought a company called NexGen for
$857 million which had a good product. Its COO was Vinod Dham
who was the designer of Pentium family. AMD introduced K6, which
was the fastest processor for a while. It is the first time someone
outside Intel made the fastest processor.
Success of K6 allowed AMD to bring down the price so that PC price
would come down below $1000. Until this period PC was priced at
around $1,500.
In reaction, Intel brought out a truncated version of Pentium named
Celeron Which is a budget PC processor.
19. Year 1999: After K6, AMD introduced Athlon as the brand name of K7
family. later referred to as Athlon classic, first processor to reach a
clock speed of 1 GHz. Athlon name was continued with Athlon-64 and
Athlon-II.
As a result, AMD also introduced a budget processor named Duron
as low cost version of Athlon to compete with Intel’s budget processor
Celeron.
Athlon comes from the Greek word Athlos meaning contest.
YEAR 2005:Opteron is the first processor to have 64 bit register. In
1995 first dual core Opteron was introduced. A month later Operon 64
X2 was the first dual core processor for consumers. Introduced dual
core Sempron for value based buyers. BEGINNING OF DUAL CORE
FOR ALL USER FAMILIES
20. Year 2007: There was no K9 after K8,rather K10 was
introduced as quad-core Opteron processor for Servers.
Same yaer Phenom quad core processors was introduced
for desktop. K
K10 processor came in dual core, triple core and quad core
2007: AMD brought out Spider named architecture where
processor, graphics processor, and motherboard all came
from AMD.
2010: Hexa-core Opteron processor named Thuban and
Istanbul. Turbo core feature: automatically shift from 3 core
to 6 core when more speed is required.
21. Year 2011: Bulldozer processor is intruced for server as
HPC(High Performance Computing) but failed to
surpass Intel as expected.
Hondo: Processor of tablets.
Llano: APU for laptops.
Jaguar: low power/low cost processor.
22. Freescale Semiconductor
Freescale was originally Motorola’s Semiconductor division.
It was one of the earliest semiconductor company in the
world founded in 1948.
Motorola divested the division into a private company called
Freescale semiconductor in 2004.
Apple used Motorola processors until Apple collaborated
with IBM.
Motorola’s MC68000 processor also also called 680x0
series revolutionized PC movement powering early
computer companies such as Apple, Sun Microsystems, H-
P, Atari, Commodore, etc.
23. Apple PowerMac G4 processor was from Motorola but
Powermac G5 processor was from IBM.
Motorola’ strength in communication and networking
sector such as wireless receiver, Automobile,
networking router, modem, TV set-top boxes, utilizes
processor from this company
24. IBM
IBM collaborates with Apple and Motorola in a strategic
partnership called AIM(Apple, IBM, Motorola).
AIM deveoped PowerPC architecture was behind all the
Apple processor in 1991 and 2006, when Apple switched to
Intel entirely.
IBM provided processor Powermac G5 which was the most
powerful desktop PC when it was launched.
IBM’s plant in East Fishkill,NY now owned by Global
Foundries( IBM paid Global Foundries $1.5 billion to take
over the facility) also makes powerful processor for its
workstation and mainframes.