Bus Customer Information Systems: MTA ’s BusTime Pilot Program
Presented by Sunil Nair, Senior Director, Bus Customer Information Systems, MTA
MTA BusTime represents a big step forward in how the MTA delivers technology to its customers.
Join MTA’s Sunil Nair for a discussion on the MTA’s new pilot project, currently in operation on the B63 route in Brooklyn. The program uses Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware and wireless
communications technology to track the real-time location of buses. Sunil will explain how the MTA developed the system, which allows riders to find the real-time location of buses that will arriveat their stop, and is accessible via a desktop web map, a mobile web site on iPhone, Android, BlackBerry, or other smartphones, and via SMS on all mobile phones.
The need for a multi-faceted appraisal framework for major public transport i...Tristan Wiggill
A presentation by transport economist, Andrew Marsay, delivered at the i-Transport UATP Conference and Exhibition held at the Sandton Convention Centre, 20 June 2018.
Presented by Eric Ziering, Director of Software, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Google Transit and the widespread adoption of the General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) has had a huge impact on the availability of Transit routing and scheduling services and information,
both from Google and third parties such as HopStop.com. The effect has been to provide
the public with high-quality information services (well beyond what was imaginable a decade
ago) while lowering the cost to transit agencies. In his presentation, Mr. Ziering will tie together a
number of transit-related information systems projects that are now in progress or have recently
been completed by Cambridge Systematics that illustrate this theme of cost-effectiveness through
the innovative use of information technology. Together, these projects showcase the potential to
maximize the effectiveness of existing transit agency resources through innovative use of information systems.
Bus Customer Information Systems: MTA ’s BusTime Pilot Program
Presented by Sunil Nair, Senior Director, Bus Customer Information Systems, MTA
MTA BusTime represents a big step forward in how the MTA delivers technology to its customers.
Join MTA’s Sunil Nair for a discussion on the MTA’s new pilot project, currently in operation on the B63 route in Brooklyn. The program uses Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware and wireless
communications technology to track the real-time location of buses. Sunil will explain how the MTA developed the system, which allows riders to find the real-time location of buses that will arriveat their stop, and is accessible via a desktop web map, a mobile web site on iPhone, Android, BlackBerry, or other smartphones, and via SMS on all mobile phones.
The need for a multi-faceted appraisal framework for major public transport i...Tristan Wiggill
A presentation by transport economist, Andrew Marsay, delivered at the i-Transport UATP Conference and Exhibition held at the Sandton Convention Centre, 20 June 2018.
Presented by Eric Ziering, Director of Software, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Google Transit and the widespread adoption of the General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) has had a huge impact on the availability of Transit routing and scheduling services and information,
both from Google and third parties such as HopStop.com. The effect has been to provide
the public with high-quality information services (well beyond what was imaginable a decade
ago) while lowering the cost to transit agencies. In his presentation, Mr. Ziering will tie together a
number of transit-related information systems projects that are now in progress or have recently
been completed by Cambridge Systematics that illustrate this theme of cost-effectiveness through
the innovative use of information technology. Together, these projects showcase the potential to
maximize the effectiveness of existing transit agency resources through innovative use of information systems.
myRide: A Real-Time Information System for the Carnegie Mellon University Shu...Karen Mesko
http://myride.heinz.cmu.edu
myRide is a real-time transit information system for the Carnegie Mellon University Shuttle. It was built by Heinz College graduate students in the fall of 2009. The pilot will end in December 2009, but the website (http://myride.heinz.cmu.edu) will remain up as we work to make myRide a permanent system at Carnegie Mellon.
Presentation given on 28 November 2013 at the Institute for Transport Studies (ITS) www.its.leeds.ac.uk
By James Bennett from METRO www.wymetro.com
Covering the importance of Smartcards from the customer viewpoint, implementation, issues arising from implementation and the benefits associated with implementation.
The Rapid Transit Corridors Conceptual Financial Plan Proposal presentation by the Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works to the TPO's Fiscal Priorities Committee on July 17, 2017. This is related to the Miami-Dade TPO SMART Plan.
NFTA Metro Route Restructuring
Presented by: James Morrell, Manager, Service Planning, NFTA
Hal Morse, Executive Director, Greater Buffalo-Niagara Region Transportation Council
The Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (NFTA) implemented a major route restructuring
initiative on October 31, 2010; a plan which required extensive organizational planning and community participation. The restructuring included adjusting service levels to make the entire system more efficient and increase passenger revenues. Buses now run more frequently over the heaviest used routes, and less frequently over lesser-used portions. This presentation will outline the steps needed to restructure service to be more efficient and cost effective.
For more information, see http://toronto.ca/smarttrack
Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.
Presentation by Richard Bickers & Phil White, Arup Engineering.
Delivered to postgraduate students at the Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, February 2015. Copyright Arup 2015 all rights reserved.
For more information, see http://toronto.ca/transitto
Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.
New Generation Transport (NGT) www.ngtmetro.com
presentation by Louise Porter & Tom Hacker, delivered to postgraduate students at the Institute for Transport Studies (ITS) University of Leeds, UK. 27 November 2014
A presentation by Mr Bill Cameron (Director: Public Transport: DOT) at the Transport Forum Month of Transport Celebrations 1 October 2015 hosted by University of Johannesburg. The theme for the event was: "Trends in Policy Development for Transport" and the topic for the presentation was: "Policy Conundrums in Urban Transport."
More like this on www.transportworldafrica.co.za
Boosting Active Transportation at the Regional Level: Setting and Meeting Performance Measures
Abstract: How can Metropolitan Planning Organizations increase and best utilize support for active transportation? Learn about approaches from MPOs in Chattanooga and Atlanta in effectively engaging the public and other agencies, setting performance measures, and prioritizing active transportation projects.
Presenters:
Presenter: Jenny Park Chattanooga Regional Planning Agency
Co-Presenter: Byron Rushing Atlanta Regional Commission
myRide: A Real-Time Information System for the Carnegie Mellon University Shu...Karen Mesko
http://myride.heinz.cmu.edu
myRide is a real-time transit information system for the Carnegie Mellon University Shuttle. It was built by Heinz College graduate students in the fall of 2009. The pilot will end in December 2009, but the website (http://myride.heinz.cmu.edu) will remain up as we work to make myRide a permanent system at Carnegie Mellon.
Presentation given on 28 November 2013 at the Institute for Transport Studies (ITS) www.its.leeds.ac.uk
By James Bennett from METRO www.wymetro.com
Covering the importance of Smartcards from the customer viewpoint, implementation, issues arising from implementation and the benefits associated with implementation.
The Rapid Transit Corridors Conceptual Financial Plan Proposal presentation by the Miami-Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works to the TPO's Fiscal Priorities Committee on July 17, 2017. This is related to the Miami-Dade TPO SMART Plan.
NFTA Metro Route Restructuring
Presented by: James Morrell, Manager, Service Planning, NFTA
Hal Morse, Executive Director, Greater Buffalo-Niagara Region Transportation Council
The Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority (NFTA) implemented a major route restructuring
initiative on October 31, 2010; a plan which required extensive organizational planning and community participation. The restructuring included adjusting service levels to make the entire system more efficient and increase passenger revenues. Buses now run more frequently over the heaviest used routes, and less frequently over lesser-used portions. This presentation will outline the steps needed to restructure service to be more efficient and cost effective.
For more information, see http://toronto.ca/smarttrack
Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.
Presentation by Richard Bickers & Phil White, Arup Engineering.
Delivered to postgraduate students at the Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, February 2015. Copyright Arup 2015 all rights reserved.
For more information, see http://toronto.ca/transitto
Do not include any personal information as all posted material on this site is considered to be part of a public record as defined by section 27 of the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
We reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. Please see Terms of Use for City of Toronto Social Media Sites at http://www.toronto.ca/e-updates/termsofuse.htm.
New Generation Transport (NGT) www.ngtmetro.com
presentation by Louise Porter & Tom Hacker, delivered to postgraduate students at the Institute for Transport Studies (ITS) University of Leeds, UK. 27 November 2014
A presentation by Mr Bill Cameron (Director: Public Transport: DOT) at the Transport Forum Month of Transport Celebrations 1 October 2015 hosted by University of Johannesburg. The theme for the event was: "Trends in Policy Development for Transport" and the topic for the presentation was: "Policy Conundrums in Urban Transport."
More like this on www.transportworldafrica.co.za
Boosting Active Transportation at the Regional Level: Setting and Meeting Performance Measures
Abstract: How can Metropolitan Planning Organizations increase and best utilize support for active transportation? Learn about approaches from MPOs in Chattanooga and Atlanta in effectively engaging the public and other agencies, setting performance measures, and prioritizing active transportation projects.
Presenters:
Presenter: Jenny Park Chattanooga Regional Planning Agency
Co-Presenter: Byron Rushing Atlanta Regional Commission
Title: Maximizing Biking and Walking Access to Transit
Track: Connect
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Hear from agencies including King County Metro, Sound Transit, and TriMet about ways they have prioritized better walk and bike connections to transit. These investments can maximize transit ridership, especially important in an era of constrained transit funding, growing multi-modal transport demand, and transitioning land use patterns.
Presenters:
Presenter: Carol Cooper King County Metro Transit
Co-Presenter: Carrie Nielson Fehr & Peers
Co-Presenter: Jeff Owen TriMet
Co-Presenter: Janine Sawyer Sound Transit
Creating a Safer System Through State Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Campaigns
Track: Prosper
Format: 90 minute panel
Abstract: Hear about approaches used by North Carolina and Florida to develop, launch, and evaluate combined education and enforcement campaigns aimed at reducing pedestrian and bicyclists injuries and deaths.
Presenters:
Presenter: Laura Sandt Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center
Co-Presenter: Lauren Blackburn North Carolina DOT
Co-Presenter: Lucas Cruse University of South Florida, Center for Urban Transportation Research
Co-Presenter: Billy Hattaway Florida DOT
Case Studies in Managing Traffic in a Developing Country with Privacy-Preserv...Biplav Srivastava
Simulation is known to be an effective technique to understand
and manage traffic in cities of developed countries. However, in developing countries, traffic management is lacking due to a wide diversity of vehicles on the road, their chaotic movement, little instrumentation to sense traffic state and limited funds to create IT and physical infrastructure to ameliorate the situation. Under these conditions, in this paper, we present our approach of using the Megaffic traffic simulator as a service to gain actionable insights for two use-cases and cities in India, a first. Our approach is general to be readily used in other use cases and cities; and our results give new insights: (a) using demographics data, traffic demand can be reduced if timings of government offices are altered in Delhi, (b) using a mobile company’s Call
Data Record (CDR) data to mine trajectories anonymously,
one can take effective traffic actions while organizing events
in Mumbai at local scale.
Mobility Pricing: How to Harness Mobility Pricing to Reduce Congestion, Promo...WSP
Acting as a technical analysis lead for the Metro Vancouver Mobility Pricing Independent Commission, WSP experts studied the use of congestion charging and mobility pricing for the Metro Vancouver Regional District.
An eight-month study ensued and resulted in a crucial set of data categorized by geography, time of day, and pricing level. The goals of the study remained: reducing congestion, generating additional revenue for the governing body, and promoting fairness.
Once you view the presentation, see WSP.com for additional information, including the Metro Vancouver Mobility Study and full Congestion Charging Report:
https://www.wsp.com/en-CA/insights/ca-four-reasons-why-cities-should-consider-congestion-charging
Alpesh Patel, of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, and Bjorn Hansen, of the Centralina Council of Governments, at the 2012 National Rural Transportation Conference.
The Miami-Dade TPO Urban Mobility Task Force SMART Street Transportation Enhancements Program (STEP) project, located at SE 8th Street & Brickell Avenue, has been implemented. The objective of this SMART STEP project was to enhance and prioritize pedestrian safety and mobility at this high pedestrian demand intersection. Enhancements included the installation of a scramble crosswalk and upgrades to signage at the intersection. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District Six led the design and construction of the improvements, while the scramble crosswalk portion involved interagency coordination between FDOT District Six, the Miami-Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW), and the Miami-Dade TPO. This project highlights innovation and accelerated project implementation to increase connectivity and enhance safety for pedestrians in Miami-Dade County.
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the November 3, 2021 Citizens' Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/dcT7vz80fhE
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the September 15, 2021 Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TARC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/oTEEepTYgSw
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the July 21, 2021 Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TARC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/SFhhrvNqh40
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the July 14, 2021 Freight Transportation Advisory Committee (FTAC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/zqV-LYyIICk
Miami-Dade TPO's Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Workshop held virtually on July 13, 2021 due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The agenda/presentation slide deck can be viewed at https://youtu.be/cA2TqI15Tac
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the June 16, 2021 Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TARC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/Ow2JcXBmzfk
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the June 15, 2021 Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/RwPCDYCaqJ0
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the May 19, 2021 Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TARC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/jmKTVYODoaY
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the May 11, 2021 Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/lzCVjfTXmYI
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the April 14, 2021 Freight Transportation Advisory Committee (FTAC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/1ckpkaErwNk
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the April 13, 2021 Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/pw_e3_vU5IE
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the April 12, 2021 Transportation Planning Council (TPC) virtual meeting. The meeting video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/_HsYuoyYaew
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the April 7, 2021 Citizens' Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) virtual meeting. The meeting video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/SqTL6J2xaeQ
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the March 17, 2021 Transportation Aesthetics Review Committee (TARC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/EruNpw4OpII
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the March 9, 2021 Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) virtual workshop. The meeting video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/vAHM4B6Ew1k
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the March 3, 2021 Citizens' Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) virtual meeting. The meeting video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/IIbCHS3pV0w
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the February 10, 2021 Freight Transportation Advisory Committee (FTAC) virtual workshop. The workshop video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/BgfHc8dLf9E
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the February 9, 2021 Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) virtual workshop. The meeting video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/F8F-dJd4kk8
The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the February 3, 2021 Citizens' Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) virtual meeting. The meeting video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/_b6mKPni8To
More from Miami-Dade Transportation Planning Organization (20)
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
2. 1
3
4
5
2
1 RECAP ON ACCESSIBILITY OVERVIEW
GEOGRAPHICAL UNIT & INPUT DATA
BASE YEAR ACCESSIBILITY RESULTS
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
2
TEST PROJECT RESULTS
NEXT STEPS
3. 1
A New Frame of Reference
RECAP ON ACCESSIBILITY OVERVIEW1
4. SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Accessibility is a simple but powerful concept that merges land
use, transportation, and demographics to provides insight into
travel behavior, transportation systems, and land development
5. HOW IS ACCESSIBILITY MEASURED?
INTRODUCTION
Accessibility is
measured as the
number
of destinations
reachable by a
set of origins in
a given
travel time.
6. Accessibility analysis needs only origins, destinations,
and the networks that connect them.
But the more detail exists about those 3 things,
the more valuable the analysis
SUMMARY
7. New metric that encompasses land use, network connectivity,
performance
Direct measure of what matters – access to opportunities
Measures across all travel modes (multimodal planning)
Shifts focus to moving people & goods rather than “solving”
congestion
Encourages greater coordination between land use and
transportation decisions (integrated planning tool)
Measures disparities for differing groups across differing purposes
and modes (ladders of opportunity)
ACCESSIBILITY IS A POWERFUL PLANNING CONCEPT AND TOOL
INTRODUCTION7
8. MODEL DEVELOPMENT
ACCESSIBILITY SCORE CALCULATION
8
Accessibility =
∑
𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂𝑂
𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 ∗𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫𝑫
Where:
OPPORTUNITIES = Number of
Jobs (HBW) or Number of
Retail/Service Establishments
(HBNW)
TRAVEL TIME = Time to reach
opportunity over actual network
(Network Analyst)
DECAY = Factor reflecting
decrease in value of opportunity
that are farther away
Auto Transit Bike Walk
Modal Activity
Ranges (defined by
speeds)
Starting
Point
Travel Time
Decay Curve
Accessibility Score =
Σ time-decayed
opportunities
9. Where is accessibility high, low, other, in terms of # of
accessible opportunities (heat maps)
How do scores relate across County (percentile)
Land use vs. Connectivity vs. Mobility diagnostics (heat maps &
numbers)
Accessibility score deltas (heat maps & numbers)
WHAT DO RESULTS LOOK LIKE?
INTRODUCTION9
Note: Results depicted here are an approximation of accessibility and do
not represent actual accessibility simulation.
10. Generate existing accessibility scores by mode
Define up to 50 scenarios composed of packages of
investments to test 2040 LRTP projects
Define up to 25 additional custom scenarios to test specific
concerns/issues/land use scenarios
Summarize results in map and table format for comparison and
assessment of 2040 plan
Identify additional needs based on results
NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESS
INTRODUCTION10
Note: Results depicted here are an approximation of accessibility and do
not represent actual accessibility simulation.
11. RELATIONSHIP TO 2040 LRTP GOALS
INTRODUCTION11
Goal 1 Improve System & Travel: Mobility – direct
relationship between accessibility and travel time/mobility
Goal 2 Increase Safety – improved multimodal
accessibility by creating safe pedestrian environment
Goal 4 Support Economic Vitality – access to jobs one
of the central metrics in accessibility analysis
Goal 5 Environment/Quality of Life – improved livability
through high multimodal accessibility, environment through
mode shift
Goal 6 Enhance Connectivity – direct relationship
between accessibility and network connectivity
Goal 8 Preserve Existing System – minimized need for
capacity improvements through targeted network
improvements and land use strategies
13. MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Micro Analysis Zones (MAZ) vs Census Blocks
29,718 Census Blocks in County
5,345 MAZs in County
Benefits of using Census Blocks
More precise location of activity
Better representation of multimodal activity
Benefits of using MAZs
More efficient computationally
Less forecasting error
GEOGRAPHICAL UNITS
13
14. MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Testing indicates reasonable
level of multimodal “simulation”
at MAZ geography for systems
planning
Average walk accessibility
in MAZ’s is 2 to 5% higher than
in Blocks
MAZ: 3,790
(4,850 in Title VI areas)
Block: 3,570
(4,730 in Title VI areas)
GEOGRAPHICAL UNITS
14
MAZ
Block
15. NETWORKS
HERE roadway network – local roads, base year travel times
GTFS transit network – transit network, schedule
SERPM – future year travel times
SOCIOECONOMIC DATA
2010 and 2040 MAZ data for pop, emp data
Sugar Access points of interest data for non-work destinations
DECAY CURVES
Maryland decay curves estimated from household survey data
Southeast Florida Household Survey for potential updates
ACCESSIBILITY MODEL INPUTS
MODEL DEVELOPMENT15
17. Walk score: 4,128
*Scores represent average number of jobs accessible at zonal
level, weighted by number of workers residing in zone
BASE YEAR ACCESSIBILITY
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK17
DRAFT
18. Walk score: 4,128
Bike score: 35,066
*Scores represent average number of jobs accessible at zonal
level, weighted by number of workers residing in zone
BASE YEAR ACCESSIBILITY
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK18
DRAFT
19. Walk score: 4,128
Bike score: 35,066
Transit score (walk access only): 158,941
*Scores represent average number of jobs accessible at zonal
level, weighted by number of workers residing in zone
BASE YEAR ACCESSIBILITY
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK19
DRAFT
20. Walk score: 4,128
Bike score: 35,066
Transit score (walk access only): 158,941
Transit score (auto, walk access): 205,879
*Scores represent average number of jobs accessible at zonal
level, weighted by number of workers residing in zone
BASE YEAR ACCESSIBILITY
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK20
DRAFT
21. Walk score: 4,128
Bike score: 35,066
Transit score (walk access only): 158,941
Transit score (auto, walk access): 205,879
Auto score: 918,687
BASE YEAR ACCESSIBILITY
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK21
DRAFT
22. Impact of Auto congestion - Peak / Off peak ratio
(% jobs accessible by auto in peak vs off peak
conditions)
Peak score: 918,687
Off Peak score: 1,106,904
Difference: 188,217 (82%)
BASE YEAR ACCESSIBILITY RESULTS
(diagnostic testing)
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK22
DRAFT
23. BASE YEAR ACCESSIBILITY RESULTS
(diagnostic testing)
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK23
Impact of Auto connectivity – Actual / Crowfly ratio
(% jobs accessible in perfectly connected vs actual
network)
Actual network auto score: 918,687
Crowfly score: 1,283,951
Difference: 365,264 (72%)
24. Other analyses in addition to jobs accessibility include access
to non-work destinations
Essential destinations represent baseline non-work trip making
Access to health care
Access to food stores
Access to government offices
Access to educational institutions
Access to cultural/recreational facilities
Access to shopping centers
Access to…
Customized scenarios can be set up to focus on specific travel
markets, goals/objectives
Set targets – e.g. minimum level of accessibility within
disadvantaged areas – walk access to 1 health care facility
BASE YEAR ACCESSIBILITY RESULTS
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK24
26. Up to 50 project bundles/scenarios to
be tested
Begin with MNAT corridors
Add NW 27th Ave Corridor
Split Corridor 8 at downtown
Define project bundles for each
corridor
CORRIDORS
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK26
27. CORRIDOR PROJECT BUNDLES
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK27
Corridor 1 Corridor 2 Corridor N…
Bike/Ped Transit Auto Bike/Ped Transit Auto Bike/Ped Transit Auto
Premium Transit
with bike/ped access imp.
Premium Transit
with auto, bike/ped access imp.
Limited Access/Express Lanes
with express bus imp.
Arterial/Collector
with bike/ped imp.
Project bundle dimensions: Corridor, Mode/sub-mode, Facility type
28. North Corridor
Premium transit with bike/ped access improvements
Premium transit with both bike/ped AND PnR improvements
Transit and Non-motorized accessibility analysis
Gratigny Expressway west extension
New limited access roadway
Auto accessibility analysis
TEST PROJECTS
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK28
29. Average access to employment, weighted by # of workers
Transit: 27th Ave premium transit Broward Co to MLK station
NORTH CORRIDOR
(premium transit + bike/ped projects)
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK29
DRAFT Ped
County-
wide
Before 4,128
After 4,129
Change 1
North
Planning
Area
Before 3,667
After 3,669
Change 2
Title VI
Areas
Before
TBD
After
Change
DRAFT
Ped improvements:
• NW 103 St from 28 Ave to 24 Ave
• NW 167 St from 32 Ave to 17 Ave
• NW 129 St from 22 Ave to 17 Ave
• NW 37 Ave from 71 St to 79 St
• NW 71 St from 32 Ave to 27 Ave
• NW 17 Ave from 157 St to 167 St
• NW 80 St from 36 Ave to 37 Ave
• SR9 Frontage Rd from 27 Ave to
SR9 Ext
30. NORTH CORRIDOR
(premium transit + bike/ped projects)
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK30
Average access to employment, weighted by # of workers
Transit: 27th Ave premium transit Broward Co to MLK station
DRAFT Ped Bike
County-
wide
Before 4,128 35,066
After 4,129 35,084
Change 1 18
North
Planning
Area
Before 3,667 38,612
After 3,669 38,681
Change 2 69
Title VI
Areas
Before
TBD
After
Change
DRAFT
Bike improvements:
• NW 22 Ave from 183
St to 38 St
• NW 22 Ave from SW 22
St to SR112
31. NORTH CORRIDOR
(premium transit + bike/ped projects)
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK31
Average access to employment, weighted by # of workers
Transit: 27th Ave premium transit Broward Co to MLK station
*Future year tests will reflect highway benefit from mode shift
DRAFT Ped Bike Transit*
County-
wide
Before 4,128 35,066 158,941
After 4,129 35,084 162,912
Change 1 18 4,971
North
Planning
Area
Before 3,667 38,612 198,771
After 3,669 38,681 210,725
Change 2 69 11,954
Title VI
Areas
Before
TBD
After
Change
DRAFT
32. NORTH CORRIDOR
(premium transit + bike/ped projects)
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK32
Average access to employment, weighted by # of workers
Transit: 27th Ave premium transit Broward Co to MLK station
*Future year tests will reflect highway benefit from mode shift
DRAFT Ped Bike Transit* Transit (w PnR)*
County-
wide
Before 4,128 35,066 158,941 205,879
After 4,129 35,084 162,912 209,914
Change 1 18 4,971 4,035
North
Planning
Area
Before 3,667 38,612 198,771 279,025
After 3,669 38,681 210,725 287,490
Change 2 69 11,954 8,465
Title VI
Areas
Before
TBD
After
Change
DRAFT
33. GRATIGNY EXPRESSWAY
(west extension)
APPLYING THE FRAMEWORK33
Impact of Gratigny west extension
(average number of jobs accessible weighted by
number of workers)
DRAFT
DRAFT Auto
County-
wide
Before 918,687
After 920,921
Change 2,234
Title VI
Areas
Before
TBD
After
Change
35. Data Preparation
Complete HERE/SERPM network equivalency for future year
input data
Define project bundles for 50 scenarios
Run Non-work accessibility in base condition
Run Tool
Generate preliminary future year scenario results
Results Analysis Framework
Define potential custom scenarios
NEXT STEPS
MOVING FORWARD35