The agenda/presentation slide deck shown during the April 12, 2021 Transportation Planning Council (TPC) virtual meeting. The meeting video can be viewed at https://youtu.be/_HsYuoyYaew

1. Miami-Dade TPO
Transportation Planning
Council (TPC)
Virtual Workshop
Monday, April 12, 2021

2. MIAMI-DADE TPO TPC VIRTUAL WORKSHOP APRIL 12, 2021
GUIDELINES 2
Rules of Engagement
• This workshop is being held virtually and is being recorded.
• If you experience technical difficulties, please contact Lisa Juan at 617 453 4269 or at lisa.juan@kimley-horn.com so that a
member of our technical support team may assist you.
• All Attendees will remain muted throughout the duration of this workshop. If you wish to provide a comment, please use the
“Raise Hand” button. The Chair will first recognize you then your microphone will be unmuted. Your microphone will remain
unmuted until the comment has been fully addressed.
• In compliance with all applicable rules and regulations, no actions or motions shall be permitted.
• Discussions shall be limited to matters listed in the published workshop agenda.
• Permissible discussions include:
• Presentations
• Questions and answers
• Comments related to the presentation(s)
• Any committee member deviating from these guidelines will be reminded as to the limitations on any such discussion.
• Please hold comments until presentations are concluded.

3. TPC Agenda
I. Information Item(s)
A. Fiscal Years 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Annual Update
B. SMART Plan Transit Oriented Communities Monitoring Tool
C. Aventura-Ojus Mobility & Access Study
II. Adjournment

4. 4
MIAMI-DADE TPO TPC VIRTUAL WORKSHOP APRIL 12, 2021
Information Item(s)
I.
INFORMATION ITEM(S)

5. 5
MIAMI-DADE TPO TPC VIRTUAL WORKSHOP APRIL 12, 2021
Fiscal Years 2022-2026
Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) Annual Update
A.
INFORMATION ITEM(S)

6. Transportation
Improvement
Program (TIP)
Miami-Dade TPO
Transportation Planning Council
(TPC) Workshop
Monday, April 12, 2021
FY 2022-26

8. MIAMI-DADE TPO CTAC MEETING MAY 6, 2020
TIP FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025
Introduction
What is the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)?
• Federally required document produced by the
Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) for the
Miami Urbanized Area.
• The TIP compiles all proposed surface
transportation improvements to be implemented in
Miami-Dade County over the coming five years
(2022-2026).
• The TIP is updated annually and amended as
needed.
8

9. MIAMI-DADE TPO CTAC MEETING MAY 6, 2020
TIP FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025
TIP Development Schedule and Milestones
October
2020
January
2021
January - March
2021
04.12.2021 04.07.2021 03.23.2021
05.05.2021 05.10.2021 05.20.2021
TIP
Development
Cycle Begins
Open
InteracTIP
database to
agencies
TIP Development
Committee
meetings (14 total)
TPC presentation
and review
CTAC presentation
and review
45-Day Public review
Period begins
CTAC
Endorsement
of TIP
TPC Endorsement of
TIP
TPO Governing
Board Adoption
of TIP
Public Review
Period Ends
05.07.2021

10. MIAMI-DADE TPO CTAC MEETING MAY 6, 2020
TIP FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025
Data
Total TIP 2022-2026: $7.555 Billion
State Roads: $4.355 Billion (57.6%)
(FDOT, Turnpike, MDX)
Public Transportation: $2.586 Billion (34.3%)
(Transit, Seaport, Aviation, SFRTA)
County Roads: $614 Million (8.1%)
(Public Works)
10

11. MIAMI-DADE TPO CTAC MEETING MAY 6, 2020
TIP FISCAL YEARS 2021-2025
Performance Management Measures (PMM)
Performance Management measures are indicators of progress toward attaining a goal, objective, or target (a desired level of future
performance). A series of Federal rulemakings have been issued by FHWA and FTA to establish National Performance Management
Measures to address the performance requirements established in MAP-21 and the FAST Act. The National Performance Management
Measures are:
 Highway Safety Improvement Program (PM 1)
 Assessing Pavement Condition for the National Highway Performance Program and Bridge Condition for the National Highway
Performance Program (PM 2)
 Assessing Performance of the National Highway System, Freight Movement on the Interstate System, and Congestion Mitigation and
Air Quality Improvement Program (PM 3)
The data for Miami-Dade County in 2019 are as follows:
11
PM 1 PM 2 PM 3
2015-2019 Rolling Average
Number of Fatalities (annual average) 302.0
Fatality Rate per 100MVMT 1.481
Number of Serious Injuries (annual average) 1,664.4
Serious Injury Rate per 100MVMT 8.169
Number of Combined Non-Motorized Fatalities
and Serious Injuries (annual average)
426.6
VMT (100 MVMT) 204.564
% of person-miles traveled on the Interstate that
are reliable
57%
% of person-miles traveled on the non-Interstate
NHS that are reliable
62%
Truck travel time reliabity ratio (TTR) on the
Interstate
3.08
Freight Mobility Performance Management Measures - 2019
Good Poor
% of NHS Bridges Conditions 81.6% 0.2%
% of Interstate Pavement Conditions 74.3% 0.0%
% of Non-Interstate Pavement Conditions 47.3% 0.1%
Bridge & Pavement Conditions - 2019

12. Questions
& Discussion
Christopher Rosenberg, Finance Manager
Phone: (305) 375-1817
E-mail: Christopher.Rosenberg@mdtpo.org
www.miamidadetpo.org

13. 13
MIAMI-DADE TPO TPC VIRTUAL WORKSHOP APRIL 12, 2021
SMART Plan Transit Oriented
Communities Monitoring Tool
B.
INFORMATION ITEM(S)

14. SMART PLAN TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES
MONITORING TOOL (TOC-MT)
Transportation Planning Council Workshop | April 12, 2021

15. 1
2
3
4
PROJECT OVERVIEW
TOOL OVERVIEW
NEXT STEPS
DISCUSSION
15

16.  Objective: provide a user-friendly interface that tracks progress toward
SMART Plan goals over time
 Project schedule: March 2020 – June 2021
PROJECT OVERVIEW
PROJECT OVERVIEW
16

17.  Integrated transportation and land use strategy that focuses on
economic development, urban design, and multimodal transportation.
 Extension of transit-oriented development (TOD) to include metrics
beyond development outcomes.
 Focus is on the walkshed (half-mile area) around existing and/or
planned rapid transit stations.
 Several major regional plans emphasize rapid transit and supportive
development patterns in station areas as part of Miami-Dade’s long
term mobility, access, and growth management strategies.
 Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP)
 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
 Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit Plan (SMART Plan)
TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES
PROJECT OVERVIEW
17

18. OUTCOMES
 Facilitate decision-making related
to TOC at a regional level
 Reinforce multi-agency /
jurisdictional collaboration by
establishing a venue for
integrating data and reporting
TOC MONITORING TOOLKIT OBJECTIVES
PROJECT OVERVIEW
18
Focus on SMART Plan goals
Develop TOC metrics to monitor across diverse topics and track
trends over time
Provide a simple interface for users

19.  Representatives from local planning partners in SMART Plan corridors
 Guide development of the toolkit
 Reporting framework
 Technical / analytical / data
 Hosting and updating
 Participate in 5 meetings
 Interact with project team on assignments
 Review work products
 Utilization of the TOC-MT
PROJECT WORKING GROUP INVOLVEMENT
PROJECT OVERVIEW
19

20. REPORTED METRICS
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Economic Development Regional Travel
• Residential units
• Jobs by sector
• Floor area by land use
• Transit ridership
• Non-auto mode share
• Access to jobs, housing, and essential
destinations by walk, bike, transit, auto
• VMT
• Trip length
Urban Form Local Access
• Development intensity
• Land use mix
• Network connectivity
• Impervious surface and land cover
• Non-motorized trip opportunities
• Non-motorized facilities
• Walk access to SMART Plan stations
• Walk access to parks
20

21. TOOL LAYOUT
TOOL OVERVIEW
21
Transit Oriented Communities Monitoring Tool
TOC Basics
Economic
Development
Growth Monitoring
Dwelling Units
Jobs
Floor Area by Land Use
Urban Form
Development Patterns
Density
Land Use Mix
Network Connectivity
Development Footprint
Impervious Surface
Regional Travel
Multimodal Travel
Non-Auto Mode Share
Transit Ridership
Regional Access
Access to Jobs and
Essential Destinations
Vehicular Travel
Vehicle Miles of Travel
Average Trip Length
Local Access
Non-Motorized
Opportunities
Bicycle Facilities
Walk Opportunities
Bike Opportunities
Access to Transit
Station Proximity
Walk Time to Stations
Directness to Stations
Access to Parks
Park Acreages
Park Proximity
Walk Time to Parks
Directness to Parks
Additional Reading
TOD in Miami
Metric Index

22. EXAMPLE DASHBOARD WALKTHROUGH
TOOL OVERVIEW
LIVE DEMO
22

23. REMAINING SCHEDULE
NEXT STEPS
Early April • TPC Workshop
• Finalize Site
Late April • Launch Site
• Transfer scripts to County GIS
• GIS staff training
May/Jun • Final PWG meeting for tool training
• Technical support as needed
Beyond • Potential version 2
• Establish TOC performance
standards and incorporate into tool
• Engage diverse agencies to
broaden scope of reporting
23

24. DISCUSSION
24

25. Jeannine Gaslonde, Transit and Regional Manager
Miami-Dade TPO
305-375-1739
Jeannine.Gaslonde@miamidade.gov
Alex Bell, Project Manager
Renaissance Planning
919-636-5032 x 504
abell@citiesthatwork.com
THANK YOU!
CONTACT
25

26. 26
MIAMI-DADE TPO TPC VIRTUAL WORKSHOP APRIL 12, 2021
Aventura-Ojus Mobility &
Access Study
C.
INFORMATION ITEM(S)

27. AVENTURA-OJUS
MOBILITYANDACCESS
STUDY
27
Transportation Planning Council (TPC)
April 12, 2021

28. Agenda
1. Project Background
2. Stakeholder Priorities
3. Existing and Proposed Conditions
4. Next Steps

29. Project Background

30. Project Background
• Brightline Aventura Station construction
began late 2020.
 Identify and recommend ‘first and last
mile’ safety and mobility improvements
around the station.
Brightline Aventura Station
Source: NE Corridor, Economic Mobility and Accessibility

31. StudyArea
FromtheAventuraStation:
-BicycleandPedestrian
Infrastructurewithin½mile;
-TransitService
Improvementsserving2mile
31

32. Source: North East Corridor, Economic Mobility and Accessibility
North-South Transportation Needs for the Coastal Communities Feasibility Study.
North-South Transportation Needs for the Coastal
Communities Feasibility Study.
PreviousStudies
Separated shared-use path along Lehman Causeway.
North East Corridor, Economic Mobility and
Accessibility

33. Stakeholder Priorities

34.  Study Advisory Group
Project stakeholders Municipality,County, State agencies, private and
public transit agencies, and neighborhood representative
Municipality Meetings
Input Highlights
 Provide transit connections
 Provide alternate walking connections fromAventura Mall
 Provide safe bicycle network
34
Stakeholder
Coordination

35. Outreach and
Survey
 Multi-Lingual Survey was distributed Online and Mail-In
 Posters with QR codes were installed at bus stops
 350 Reponses Received
Majority live in Aventura & between the ages of 31 to 65-years
OUTREACH
SURVEY RESULTS

36. Survey
Responses
36
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
WA LK
B IK E/B IK E SH A R E
TR A N SIT/SH UTTLE
OTH ER (COMB IN A TION OF MODES)
R IDE -H A ILIN G SER V ICES
DR IV E OR G ET DR OPPED OF F
HOW WOULD YOU LIKELY TRAVEL TO THE
AVENTURA TRAIN STATION?
63% will use vehicle modes of travel.
3% will use a combination of vehicle and non-vehicle
modes of travel.
34% will use non-vehicle modes of travel.

37. 37
5%
28%
26%
25%
15%
OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
WIDE, CONTINUOUS SIDEWALKS
TREE/SHADE COVER ALONG SIDEWALKS
CROSSWALKS
SIGNAGE/WAYFINDING
IFYOU ARE WALKING,WHICH OFTHESE IMPROVEMENTS
ARE ESSENTIAL? CHECK ALLTHAT APPLY.
Survey
Responses

38. 38
8%
34%
28%
21%
9%
OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
STANDARD AND GREEN-COLORED BIKE LANES
BIKE STORAGE LOCKERS
BIKE-SHARING STATIONS (CITIBIKE, LIME)
SHARED-USE LANE
IFYOU ARE BIKING, WHICH OFTHESE IMPROVEMENTS
ARE ESSENTIAL? CHECK ALLTHAT APPLY.
Survey
Responses

39. 39
4%
27%
21%
20%
15%
13%
OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
FREQUENT OPERATIONAL HOURS
SHELTERED BUS/SHUTTLE STOPS
ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE UPDATES
EXTENDED OPERATIONAL HOURS
DIRECT CONNECTIONS
IFYOU ARE USING A SHUTTLE OR A BUS,WHICH OF
THESE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ESSENTIAL? CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY.
Survey
Responses

40. 40
24%
76%
NO
YES
WOULDYOU USE AN ON-DEMAND SHUTTLE,
INSTEAD OF DRIVING OR BEING DROPPED OFF, IF IT
WERE AVAILABLE?
Survey
Responses

41. Data Collection
Site data was collected using Arc GIS Survey App, on:
1. Pedestrian Infrastructure
• Sidewalk
• Crossings
2. Bike Infrastructure
• Bike lanes (Dedicated / Inadequate / Missing)
• Crossings
• Bikeshare, Amenities (Bike Racks)
3. Transit Infrastructure
• Route
• Signage
• Amenities (Seating, Shelter)
4. High crashes locations (identified through crash analysis)
• Observe vehicle, bike, ped movements
• Roadway geometrics

42. Existing and
ProposedConditions

43. Transit Service
ExistingTransit Service
Local Circulators
RecommendedTransit Service

44. Vehicular Infrastructure
Existing Roadway Conditions Recommended Improvements

45. Bicycle Infrastructure
Existing Bicycle Infrastructure Recommended Improvements

46. Multimodal Infrastructure
Existing Pedestrian Infrastructure Improvements for People Walking and Biking

47. Corridors
1
2
3
4
5
6

48. Existing Conditions
For People Walking:
No E-WCrossing opportunities between Ives Dairy Road and
NE 186th St (1 Mile)
For People Biking:
Partial north bound bike-lane (on east side)
48
1. NE 26th Avenue
Evaluate the Feasibility of Proposed
Improvements
 Potential repurposing of the center-turn lane to a median
 Further evaluate implementation of roundabouts
 Evaluate the removal of partial, discontinuous bike-lane
pavement markings
For People Walking:
Evaluate installing marked mid-block crossings with
pedestrian refuge islands and larger sidewalks.
AADT: low-volume, residential
Posted Speed: 30MPH
Turn Lane Bike Lane
EXISTING
Median
PROPOSED Evaluate reducing posted speed: 25MPH

49. Evaluate the Feasibility of Proposed
Improvements
Evaluate potential of repurposing on-street parking to provide
improvements for all users.
For People Walking:
Evaluate potential dedicated (8’) paved path and (4’) landscape,
pedestrian lighting and seating, and adding new marked mid-block
crossing with refuge island.
For People Biking:
Evaluate potential of installing separated & continuous two-way bike
lane/cycle-track(12’).
For People usingTransit:
 Extend County transit route to Aventura station. Provide shelter at
bus stop waiting area.
 Connect surrounding municipalities with fixed route & on-demand
shuttle
2. Dixie Highway Improvements
Existing Conditions
For People Walking:
No marked crossings South of Ives Dairy Rd
For People Biking:
 No continuous bike facilities.
 Existing bike facilities are on the west-side with multiple
driveways, and east-side is used for parking.
For People usingTransit:
 One bus route (Route 9) services the corridor.
 Bus stops do not have shelters
EXISTING
Parking + Bike lane
Multi-use Paved Path
PROPOSED Evaluate reducing posted speed: 25MPH
AADT: low-volume
Posted Speed: 30MPH

50. 50
Dixie Highway (looking North)
Pedestrian
Refuge Island
Bi-Directional
CycleTrack,
Walking Path
ExistingView

51. 3. Biscayne Boulevard
Evaluate the Feasibility of Proposed
Improvements
 Conduct traffic analysis and evaluate removing underutilized
right-turn auxiliary lanes, channelized right-turn
 Evaluate the signal timings to improve traffic flow while
providing adequate crossing time for pedestrians
For People Walking:
 Evaluate installing pedestrian refuge islands at NE 195th Street
connecting to bus stop
 Evaluate updating signal timings to provide Lead Pedestrian
Intervals (LPIs) for North-South crossings
For People Biking:
 Utilize alternate bike routes proposed along Dixie Highway.
Evaluate upgrading the existing discontinuous bike pavement
markings.
Existing Conditions
 High-Crash 1-Mile Corridor (2015-19). 58 vehicle and 17 bike-
ped fatal and severe crashes
 No DirectTransit Connection to Brightline Station
AADT: 81,000
Posted Speed: 45MPH
Evaluate reducing posted speed to 35MPH.
Severe and Fatal Crashes Heat Map
Ives Dairy Road

52. 52
4. NE 203rd Street & NE 29th Place
Evaluate the Feasibility of Proposed
Improvements
Evaluate repurposing 15’ slip road with 11’ travel lane and
installing roundabout at NE 29th Pl intersection.
For People Walking:
Evaluate installing a raised ‘plaza’ under the US-1 bridge with art
painted under the bridge.
Evaluate installing a dedicated (8’) paved path and (4’)
landscape, pedestrian lighting and seating
For People Biking:
Evaluate installing a separated & continuous two-way bike
lane/cycle-track
Existing Conditions
For People Walking:
5’ sidewalks, some crossing opportunities
For People Biking:
No dedicated bike facilities but Strava data
indicated high number of bicyclists
For People usingTransit:
Served by two bus routes
AADT: 65,000
Posted Speed: 35MPH
Modern Roundabout
Safe Crossings for People Biking & Walking
Evaluate reducing posted speed: 25MPH

53. 53
Art on the under
bridge walls
NE 203rd Street
(under the US-1 bridge looking East)
Raised ‘Plaza’
for activities
Bi-Directional
CycleTrack,
Walking Path
Walking Path
All Existing
Travel Lanes
Remain
ExistingView

54. 54
Existing Conditions
For People Walking:
 Continuous sidewalk
 No crossing opportunities between Biscayne Blvd and 29th Place (1700
Ft).
For People usingTransit:
 Major bus route serving the transit hub
For People Biking:
 No dedicated bike facilities
5. NE 199th Street
Evaluate the Feasibility of Proposed Improvements
Evaluate repurposing one travel lane to separated bike lane.
For People Walking:
Evaluate installing new mid-block crossings (serving people using bus stops).
For People Biking:
Evaluate installing separated & continuous bike lane/cycle track (7’)
Travel lane Travel lane
PROPOSED
Separated
bike lane
Separated
bike lane
EXISTING AADT: 10,300
Posted Speed: 35MPH
Evaluate reducing posted
speed: 25MPH

55. Existing Conditions
 Restricted access between Country Club Dr and US-1
 Multi-use path between A1A andCountry Cub Dr.
6. Country Club Dr. & W. H . L. Causeway Ramp
Evaluate the Feasibility of Proposed
Improvements
Evaluate repurposing one travel lane to separated bike lane.
For People Walking:
Evaluate installing new mid-block crossings (serving people
using bus stops).
For People Biking:
Evaluate installing separated & continuous two-way bike
lane/cycle-track
EXISTING
Westbound Ramp
PROPOSED
Westbound Ramp
EXISTING
Country Club Dr.
PROPOSED
Country Club Dr.
AADT: 10,500
Posted Speed: 35MPH
Evaluate reducing
posted speed: 25MPH
AADT: 12,900
Posted Speed: 35MPH
Evaluate reducing
posted speed: 25MPH

56. 56
Portfolio of Proposed Improvements
Quick-build intersection and bike lanes
On-demand transit vehicle
SMART Demonstration project at City of Aventura
Bike share, Scooter share, bike lanes
Support DTPW efforts in bikeshare, scooter share
Pedestrian Lighting
Quick-build bike route signage Quick-build plaza with paint and
temporary lighting.

57. 57
Integrated
MobilityServices
Value to the customer:
Integrated and communicate
the last-mile/first-mile options
provided by private and public
entities to the user via an APP.
Value to transit agencies:
Adjust number of shuttles
and time based on user
demand.
https://whimapp.com/
Integrate with DTPW efforts.
GO Connect Mobile Application

58. Short-term
Recommendations
1-3 years
58
Transit Service Infrastructure
On-Demand Shuttle to municipalities $150,000
Extend MDT Routes 93,119,183 CostTBD by MDT
Internal municipality circulators CostTBD by
Municipalities
Bicycle andWalking Infrastructure
Wayfinding signage (pedestrian and bicyclist) $30,000
Study to access bike lane extension to Greynolds Park,
and to Hallandale beach
$70,000
Paint under the bridge (US-1 and NE203rd) with local
artist
$300,000
Increase Safety for all Roadway users
M-D DTPW and City of Aventura coordinate forVision
Zero program. Phase 1- Comprehensive Safety Audit
$250,000

59. 59
Mid-term
Recommendations
3-5 years
Bicycle andWalking Infrastructure
Pedestrian lighting on multimodal priority corridors $1,457,000
Raised Plaza (US-1 and NE203rd) combined with the
funded 2021TIP
$300,000
Gateway sculptures by local artists $175,000
Separated walking, biking paved path along Dixie
Highway
$500,000
Increase Safety for all Roadway users
Roundabout at identified locations $750,000 per roundabout
City of AventuraVision Zero program.
Phase 2- Fund identified safety projects.
To be determined in phase-1 of the
safety study

60. NextSteps
CoordinationwithAgencyPartners
60

61. Thank you!
Contact:
Kevin Walford,TPO Project Manager.
Kevin.Walford@miamidade.gov
Catherine Prince, Consultant Project Manager.
Catherine.Prince@wsp.com
61
Today’s presentation slides was sent to all the SAG members.

62. 62
MIAMI-DADE TPO TPC VIRTUAL WORKSHOP APRIL 12, 2021
Adjournment
II.
ADJOURNMENT