Media CW - Institutions
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•180 views
The document discusses two potential film distribution companies - Warner Bros and Momentum Pictures. Warner Bros is a large, vertically and horizontally integrated company that has been in business for over 100 years and distributes films to major cinemas as well as its own theaters. Momentum Pictures is a smaller, more local UK independent distributor that releases around 20 films per year in theaters. The document concludes that Momentum Pictures would be a more realistic choice for a small production company due to its local presence.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Evaluation Activity 3
The document discusses distribution options for an independent UK thriller film. It states that a distributor's role is to market and circulate films in theaters and home video. For an independent short film, distributors like Dazzle, Futureshorts, and Shorts International could represent the film at festivals in hopes of selling it to television or other outlets. The document determines that UK independent distributors like IVT, Film4, and BBC would be best suited to distribute an independent British thriller, rather than large Hollywood studios, due to the film's smaller budget and unknown cast.
Media Distributor Evaluation 3
The document discusses the roles of distributors and production companies in the film industry. It notes that distributors control the marketing and circulation of movies in theaters and home video formats. They promote films to target audiences to maximize profits. The document suggests that an independent UK thriller film would be best distributed by UK independent distributors like IVT, Film4, or BBC. A production company assists with budgeting, casting, and scripting and is responsible for any issues during filming.
Media insti
Here is a draft section on film festivals:
Film festivals can be another important avenue for independent films seeking distribution. Some key festivals to consider include:
- Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) - One of the largest public film festivals in the world, held annually in Toronto, Canada. TIFF is a major launching point for Oscar contenders and international titles seeking North American distribution. Screening at TIFF can help generate buzz and interest from distributors.
- Sundance Film Festival - The largest independent film festival in the U.S., held annually in Park City, Utah. Sundance premieres both American and international independent films. Landing a slot at Sundance is highly competitive but can lead to acquisition deals, as many distributors
Assignment 10
The document discusses several film distribution companies and provides details about their histories, budgets, and genres of films distributed. Lionsgate is a relatively new North American company known for distributing comedy and drama films on budgets of $10-21 million. Universal has distributed drama films like 4321 and Alpha Dog for $4.6-30 million and is experienced in drama films featuring young characters. Paramount Pictures, founded in 1912, distributes a variety of genres including drama, horror, and comedy, such as Mean Girls and Freedom Writers for $15-21 million. Revolver Entertainment, founded in 1997, distributes films targeted towards young audiences, mainly dramas filmed in London on budgets under $2 million like Anuvahood
Memeala
Film 4 is a British film distribution company established in 1998 that focuses on distributing low to medium budget British films to audiences in the UK. They have had success distributing films like Slumdog Millionaire without heavy use of CGI or special effects. The document suggests Film 4 would be a good fit to distribute a low-budget British horror film targeting teenage males in the UK.
Task 3 evaluation
This is the AS media coursework evaluation slideshow. It is for Task 3 of our blogs and we are analysing production and distribution companies.
Raj
Momentum Pictures is identified as a potential UK-based distributor for the film. As a lower-budget company that also distributes larger films, they could realistically handle distribution. The film has potential for international audiences beyond the UK as it involves detectives, a universally recognizable concept. If distribution is pursued, a company could handle promotions like billboards, TV, radio, and other ads. Self-promotion is also an option with a limited budget, using social media ads, word-of-mouth, business cards, leaflets, and posters.
Institutional decisions
Our production company is called Clockwork Productions. We chose this name because it sounds established like other major studios while also being short and catchy. For our logo, we designed a stylized image of clockwork in an old-fashioned style to represent our company's focus on quality work.
We will distribute our film The Dare Game through Revolver, a British distributor that has successfully released other thriller films targeting our intended audience.
The primary source of funding for The Dare Game will be a grant from the British film industry lottery fund, which supports new filmmakers. This funding source is the most suitable and ensures our film can be produced and distributed as planned.
Recommended
Evaluation Activity 3
The document discusses distribution options for an independent UK thriller film. It states that a distributor's role is to market and circulate films in theaters and home video. For an independent short film, distributors like Dazzle, Futureshorts, and Shorts International could represent the film at festivals in hopes of selling it to television or other outlets. The document determines that UK independent distributors like IVT, Film4, and BBC would be best suited to distribute an independent British thriller, rather than large Hollywood studios, due to the film's smaller budget and unknown cast.
Media Distributor Evaluation 3
The document discusses the roles of distributors and production companies in the film industry. It notes that distributors control the marketing and circulation of movies in theaters and home video formats. They promote films to target audiences to maximize profits. The document suggests that an independent UK thriller film would be best distributed by UK independent distributors like IVT, Film4, or BBC. A production company assists with budgeting, casting, and scripting and is responsible for any issues during filming.
Media insti
Here is a draft section on film festivals:
Film festivals can be another important avenue for independent films seeking distribution. Some key festivals to consider include:
- Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) - One of the largest public film festivals in the world, held annually in Toronto, Canada. TIFF is a major launching point for Oscar contenders and international titles seeking North American distribution. Screening at TIFF can help generate buzz and interest from distributors.
- Sundance Film Festival - The largest independent film festival in the U.S., held annually in Park City, Utah. Sundance premieres both American and international independent films. Landing a slot at Sundance is highly competitive but can lead to acquisition deals, as many distributors
Assignment 10
The document discusses several film distribution companies and provides details about their histories, budgets, and genres of films distributed. Lionsgate is a relatively new North American company known for distributing comedy and drama films on budgets of $10-21 million. Universal has distributed drama films like 4321 and Alpha Dog for $4.6-30 million and is experienced in drama films featuring young characters. Paramount Pictures, founded in 1912, distributes a variety of genres including drama, horror, and comedy, such as Mean Girls and Freedom Writers for $15-21 million. Revolver Entertainment, founded in 1997, distributes films targeted towards young audiences, mainly dramas filmed in London on budgets under $2 million like Anuvahood
Memeala
Film 4 is a British film distribution company established in 1998 that focuses on distributing low to medium budget British films to audiences in the UK. They have had success distributing films like Slumdog Millionaire without heavy use of CGI or special effects. The document suggests Film 4 would be a good fit to distribute a low-budget British horror film targeting teenage males in the UK.
Task 3 evaluation
This is the AS media coursework evaluation slideshow. It is for Task 3 of our blogs and we are analysing production and distribution companies.
Raj
Momentum Pictures is identified as a potential UK-based distributor for the film. As a lower-budget company that also distributes larger films, they could realistically handle distribution. The film has potential for international audiences beyond the UK as it involves detectives, a universally recognizable concept. If distribution is pursued, a company could handle promotions like billboards, TV, radio, and other ads. Self-promotion is also an option with a limited budget, using social media ads, word-of-mouth, business cards, leaflets, and posters.
Institutional decisions
Our production company is called Clockwork Productions. We chose this name because it sounds established like other major studios while also being short and catchy. For our logo, we designed a stylized image of clockwork in an old-fashioned style to represent our company's focus on quality work.
We will distribute our film The Dare Game through Revolver, a British distributor that has successfully released other thriller films targeting our intended audience.
The primary source of funding for The Dare Game will be a grant from the British film industry lottery fund, which supports new filmmakers. This funding source is the most suitable and ensures our film can be produced and distributed as planned.
Task 3
Metrodome Group Ltd is a London-based company that owns, manages and distributes film, TV and digital content through two divisions: Metrodome Distribution which distributes features films and home entertainment in the UK, and Hollywood Classics. The company's library of rights includes over 300 feature films.
Distribution
The document discusses several film distribution companies and assesses their suitability for distributing an independent horror film of low budget. It is concluded that Left Film Distributor would be most likely to distribute the film, as they specialize in independent horror films for a UK audience, and support independent filmmakers despite having a limited budget. Warner Bros and Film4 Productions are also discussed but considered less suitable due to the former focusing on larger budget films and the latter having cut costs significantly in recent years.
Blog3
Left Films would be a suitable distributor for the film as they specialize in distributing low-budget horror and thriller films, including slasher films similar to the one being proposed. Hammer Films and Film 4 Productions could also effectively distribute the film given their experience producing successful horror films and willingness to work with lower budgets. Both companies have audiences interested in the thriller/horror genre and would help attract new viewers.
Blog3
A film distributor is responsible for marketing and distributing a film. They set the release date and choose how the film will be exhibited or made available for viewing, such as in cinemas or on DVD. Multinational distributors have larger budgets to distribute and promote films nationally or worldwide, while independent distributors have limited local promotion budgets. Left Films and Hammer Films are suggested as potential distributors for the filmmaker's slasher film because they specialize in low-budget horror and thriller genres. Film4 Productions is also proposed as they have successfully distributed similar films without any current competing titles.
Media evaluation question 3
This document discusses that a large studio like Warner Brothers would be best suited to produce and distribute a movie similar in genre and budget to the one described. Warner Brothers makes big budget action and adventure films for worldwide audiences of males ages 15-30. They could market and distribute the movie globally in theaters and on home video/streaming platforms to maximize profits, just as they did for movies like The Dark Knight Rises.
Media timeline tv sponsorships
TV sponsorships began in the 1950s when companies like Kraft and Colgate sponsored entire programs to advertise their products. In the 1960s, programs moved to multiple short sponsors per break instead of one long-term sponsor. Tobacco advertising was banned in 1971 due to health concerns. In the 1980s, cartoons advertising toys became popular sponsors aimed at children. Modernly, declining TV viewership and the rise of streaming services like Netflix have diminished the effectiveness of TV sponsorships for younger audiences.
Low budget vs high budget films
1) Napoleon Dynamite had a budget of $400,000 and was produced by MTV Films, while The Dark Knight Rises had a budget of $250 million and was produced by 4 major companies including Warner Bros.
2) Napoleon Dynamite made $44.9 million in profits despite its low budget, while The Dark Knight Rises made $433 million in profits.
3) Warner Bros is one of the largest and most well-known production companies known for franchises like Harry Potter, while MTV Films is smaller and less well-known but has had success with low-budget films like Jackass.
Evaluation question 3
The document discusses the distribution and production companies used for a low budget thriller film. For distribution, the filmmakers created their own company called THOR Distribution due to copyright issues and the low budget. For production, they used Candi Studios, a smaller independent company funded by the city, as they were pleased to collaborate on the low budget film. These two companies were best suited for the low budget thriller. The film was given a cinematic release at The Screen in Angel, Islington and will have a 250 DVD release alongside an internet release on Vimeo.
Celador analysis
Celador is a UK entertainment company founded in 1981 by Paul Smith and Jasper Carrot. It was originally created to produce the TV show "The Detectives" but later expanded into film production. Celador uses a small budget model, funding films through co-productions with other companies and selling distribution rights. Notable Celador films include Dirty Pretty Things, The Descent, and Slumdog Millionaire. In addition to film, Celador operates UK radio stations and occasional TV shows. Main competitors are Vertigo Films and DNA Films, which also use a low-budget, co-production model. Financial data shows that Celador films like The Descent achieved high profits relative to their small budgets.
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
This document discusses potential media institutions that could distribute a low-budget independent UK film called "The Echoing." It analyzes several options, including independent UK distributors like Optimum Releasing and Revolver Entertainment, as well as larger studios. It determines that Optimum Releasing or Revolver Entertainment would be the most suitable choices, as they specialize in independent films and UK-only distribution, which matches the film's limited scope and budget. Bigger studios aiming for worldwide tentpole releases are deemed unsuitable due to their higher costs and ambitions beyond the film's means.
Task 7 film distribution companies
Warp X is a British independent film production and distribution company founded in 2005. They specialize in low-budget films and have distributed 10 films in the past 8 years, including the crime thriller Kill List in 2011. Their film budgets typically range from £400,000 to £800,000. Warp X supports new and independent directors and talents, in line with their goal of promoting the British film industry. They would be the most suitable distributor for a new independent British crime film due to their experience with low-budget films and niche audiences.
To understand the media industry
Warner Brothers is a subsidiary of Time Warner which owns many media companies across television, movies, video games and the internet. Warner Brothers was founded in 1905 by the Warner Brothers who started in film exhibition and eventually founded their own film studio in Hollywood in 1918. Some notable Warner Brothers films include the Batman, Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings franchises. Their 2012 film The Dark Knight Rises had a $230 million budget and grossed over $448 million globally. Warner Brothers competes with other major film studios to produce blockbuster films and win awards.
Media coursework
The document discusses film distribution and potential companies to distribute a new film. It describes film distribution as getting a film shown in cinemas, TV, DVD, or online. Distribution involves legal rights, marketing, and releasing the film. The document recommends two potential distribution companies - Metrodome and Revolver Entertainment. They were chosen because they have distributed similar genre films to the one being discussed. The document proposes using viral marketing, business cards, emails, cinema screenings, DVD sales in stores, and a website to distribute the film on a limited budget.
Case study UNFINISHED
The document provides information about the 2013 film The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. It was produced by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), New Line Cinema, and WingNut Films. Directed by Peter Jackson, it starred Ian McKellen, Martin Freeman, and Richard Armitage. It was distributed worldwide by Warner Bros. and had a budget of $250 million and worldwide box office gross of $950 million, resulting in a $700 million profit.
Distribution
The document discusses several film distribution companies. Warner Bros. is a large multinational distributor with a large budget that is unlikely to distribute low-budget, independent films. Film 4 Productions is a UK company that distributes independent films, especially gritty "kitchen sink" films, though it has a smaller budget and audience overseas. Left Film Distributor is a new independent UK distributor focused on horror, sci-fi, action and comedy genres from independent filmmakers, making it most likely to distribute the discussed low-budget, independent, horror film.
Unit 1 celador Mitchell Purnell
Celador was founded in 1983 by Jasper Carrot and produced films and television shows, most notably creating the game show "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?". In 1999, they were acquired by Complete Communications but later bought back their independence. Celador has had success producing films like "Slumdog Millionaire" and "The Descent" on small budgets that generated significant profits. They operate by organizing project-by-project crews and financing productions through means like investment, loans, and distribution deals.
Question 3
The document discusses the advantages and disadvantages of independent and mainstream film distributors. It suggests that Warp, an independent distributor, might be interested in distributing the film as they offer more flexibility and a friendly contract, though have less money. A mainstream distributor like Warner Bros could offer more money but would likely take more control over the film. Ultimately, the document recommends Safehouse Pictures UK as they are a small, local horror film distributor who would build a personal relationship and give the filmmakers more control, helping to reach their niche audience.
Memeala
Film 4 is a British film distribution company established in 1998 that focuses on distributing low to medium budget British films without heavy CGI or special effects. They have had success distributing films like Slumdog Millionaire and horror films. The document suggests Film 4 would be a good choice to distribute a low budget British horror film because of their target audience and experience with similar films.
What kind of media institution might distribute your
This document discusses film distribution and the selection of a distribution company for a media project. It provides background on film distributors, listing the top four distributing companies by total box office earnings. It then explains why the author chose the independent production and distribution company Orion Pictures, which was known for distributing art house and Hollywood quality films across genres like comedy, crime, and mystery from 1978 to 1998. Key directors like Woody Allen worked with Orion Pictures during its successful years.
Evaluation group010 task 3
The document discusses production companies, distribution companies, and funding for a hypothetical film. It describes choosing Miramax Films as the production company due to their experience producing similar films. Paramount Pictures is selected as the distribution company for their success distributing comparable genre films. The target budget for the film is £10-20 million, which the creators hope to obtain from Paramount given a promising project.
Using LSIS generator to determine the e-maturity of your organisation
The document discusses using the LSIS Generator tool to assess e-maturity. It provides an overview of upcoming developments to the Generator tool, including:
1) Incorporating a new Senior Leadership Module to allow for strategic views and planning.
2) Improving the user experience through upgrades to make the Generator Portal more accessible with improved formatting of case studies and videos.
3) Potential longer term integration with surveys and questionnaires for practitioners and learners.
Technical Forum - November 2013
The document summarizes a technical forum held by the Jisc RSC East Midlands on November 15, 2013. The agenda included presentations on using Spiceworks for network monitoring and inventory management, and using screencasting tools to support users. The forum was intended to enable discussion between technical staff, raise issues, and share best practices. Participants then discussed current issues and shared experiences using various tools like Spiceworks and screencasting software. The next meeting was scheduled for February 13, 2014.
More Related Content
What's hot
Task 3
Metrodome Group Ltd is a London-based company that owns, manages and distributes film, TV and digital content through two divisions: Metrodome Distribution which distributes features films and home entertainment in the UK, and Hollywood Classics. The company's library of rights includes over 300 feature films.
Distribution
The document discusses several film distribution companies and assesses their suitability for distributing an independent horror film of low budget. It is concluded that Left Film Distributor would be most likely to distribute the film, as they specialize in independent horror films for a UK audience, and support independent filmmakers despite having a limited budget. Warner Bros and Film4 Productions are also discussed but considered less suitable due to the former focusing on larger budget films and the latter having cut costs significantly in recent years.
Blog3
Left Films would be a suitable distributor for the film as they specialize in distributing low-budget horror and thriller films, including slasher films similar to the one being proposed. Hammer Films and Film 4 Productions could also effectively distribute the film given their experience producing successful horror films and willingness to work with lower budgets. Both companies have audiences interested in the thriller/horror genre and would help attract new viewers.
Blog3
A film distributor is responsible for marketing and distributing a film. They set the release date and choose how the film will be exhibited or made available for viewing, such as in cinemas or on DVD. Multinational distributors have larger budgets to distribute and promote films nationally or worldwide, while independent distributors have limited local promotion budgets. Left Films and Hammer Films are suggested as potential distributors for the filmmaker's slasher film because they specialize in low-budget horror and thriller genres. Film4 Productions is also proposed as they have successfully distributed similar films without any current competing titles.
Media evaluation question 3
This document discusses that a large studio like Warner Brothers would be best suited to produce and distribute a movie similar in genre and budget to the one described. Warner Brothers makes big budget action and adventure films for worldwide audiences of males ages 15-30. They could market and distribute the movie globally in theaters and on home video/streaming platforms to maximize profits, just as they did for movies like The Dark Knight Rises.
Media timeline tv sponsorships
TV sponsorships began in the 1950s when companies like Kraft and Colgate sponsored entire programs to advertise their products. In the 1960s, programs moved to multiple short sponsors per break instead of one long-term sponsor. Tobacco advertising was banned in 1971 due to health concerns. In the 1980s, cartoons advertising toys became popular sponsors aimed at children. Modernly, declining TV viewership and the rise of streaming services like Netflix have diminished the effectiveness of TV sponsorships for younger audiences.
Low budget vs high budget films
1) Napoleon Dynamite had a budget of $400,000 and was produced by MTV Films, while The Dark Knight Rises had a budget of $250 million and was produced by 4 major companies including Warner Bros.
2) Napoleon Dynamite made $44.9 million in profits despite its low budget, while The Dark Knight Rises made $433 million in profits.
3) Warner Bros is one of the largest and most well-known production companies known for franchises like Harry Potter, while MTV Films is smaller and less well-known but has had success with low-budget films like Jackass.
Evaluation question 3
The document discusses the distribution and production companies used for a low budget thriller film. For distribution, the filmmakers created their own company called THOR Distribution due to copyright issues and the low budget. For production, they used Candi Studios, a smaller independent company funded by the city, as they were pleased to collaborate on the low budget film. These two companies were best suited for the low budget thriller. The film was given a cinematic release at The Screen in Angel, Islington and will have a 250 DVD release alongside an internet release on Vimeo.
Celador analysis
Celador is a UK entertainment company founded in 1981 by Paul Smith and Jasper Carrot. It was originally created to produce the TV show "The Detectives" but later expanded into film production. Celador uses a small budget model, funding films through co-productions with other companies and selling distribution rights. Notable Celador films include Dirty Pretty Things, The Descent, and Slumdog Millionaire. In addition to film, Celador operates UK radio stations and occasional TV shows. Main competitors are Vertigo Films and DNA Films, which also use a low-budget, co-production model. Financial data shows that Celador films like The Descent achieved high profits relative to their small budgets.
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
This document discusses potential media institutions that could distribute a low-budget independent UK film called "The Echoing." It analyzes several options, including independent UK distributors like Optimum Releasing and Revolver Entertainment, as well as larger studios. It determines that Optimum Releasing or Revolver Entertainment would be the most suitable choices, as they specialize in independent films and UK-only distribution, which matches the film's limited scope and budget. Bigger studios aiming for worldwide tentpole releases are deemed unsuitable due to their higher costs and ambitions beyond the film's means.
Task 7 film distribution companies
Warp X is a British independent film production and distribution company founded in 2005. They specialize in low-budget films and have distributed 10 films in the past 8 years, including the crime thriller Kill List in 2011. Their film budgets typically range from £400,000 to £800,000. Warp X supports new and independent directors and talents, in line with their goal of promoting the British film industry. They would be the most suitable distributor for a new independent British crime film due to their experience with low-budget films and niche audiences.
To understand the media industry
Warner Brothers is a subsidiary of Time Warner which owns many media companies across television, movies, video games and the internet. Warner Brothers was founded in 1905 by the Warner Brothers who started in film exhibition and eventually founded their own film studio in Hollywood in 1918. Some notable Warner Brothers films include the Batman, Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings franchises. Their 2012 film The Dark Knight Rises had a $230 million budget and grossed over $448 million globally. Warner Brothers competes with other major film studios to produce blockbuster films and win awards.
Media coursework
The document discusses film distribution and potential companies to distribute a new film. It describes film distribution as getting a film shown in cinemas, TV, DVD, or online. Distribution involves legal rights, marketing, and releasing the film. The document recommends two potential distribution companies - Metrodome and Revolver Entertainment. They were chosen because they have distributed similar genre films to the one being discussed. The document proposes using viral marketing, business cards, emails, cinema screenings, DVD sales in stores, and a website to distribute the film on a limited budget.
Case study UNFINISHED
The document provides information about the 2013 film The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. It was produced by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM), New Line Cinema, and WingNut Films. Directed by Peter Jackson, it starred Ian McKellen, Martin Freeman, and Richard Armitage. It was distributed worldwide by Warner Bros. and had a budget of $250 million and worldwide box office gross of $950 million, resulting in a $700 million profit.
Distribution
The document discusses several film distribution companies. Warner Bros. is a large multinational distributor with a large budget that is unlikely to distribute low-budget, independent films. Film 4 Productions is a UK company that distributes independent films, especially gritty "kitchen sink" films, though it has a smaller budget and audience overseas. Left Film Distributor is a new independent UK distributor focused on horror, sci-fi, action and comedy genres from independent filmmakers, making it most likely to distribute the discussed low-budget, independent, horror film.
Unit 1 celador Mitchell Purnell
Celador was founded in 1983 by Jasper Carrot and produced films and television shows, most notably creating the game show "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?". In 1999, they were acquired by Complete Communications but later bought back their independence. Celador has had success producing films like "Slumdog Millionaire" and "The Descent" on small budgets that generated significant profits. They operate by organizing project-by-project crews and financing productions through means like investment, loans, and distribution deals.
Question 3
The document discusses the advantages and disadvantages of independent and mainstream film distributors. It suggests that Warp, an independent distributor, might be interested in distributing the film as they offer more flexibility and a friendly contract, though have less money. A mainstream distributor like Warner Bros could offer more money but would likely take more control over the film. Ultimately, the document recommends Safehouse Pictures UK as they are a small, local horror film distributor who would build a personal relationship and give the filmmakers more control, helping to reach their niche audience.
Memeala
Film 4 is a British film distribution company established in 1998 that focuses on distributing low to medium budget British films without heavy CGI or special effects. They have had success distributing films like Slumdog Millionaire and horror films. The document suggests Film 4 would be a good choice to distribute a low budget British horror film because of their target audience and experience with similar films.
What kind of media institution might distribute your
This document discusses film distribution and the selection of a distribution company for a media project. It provides background on film distributors, listing the top four distributing companies by total box office earnings. It then explains why the author chose the independent production and distribution company Orion Pictures, which was known for distributing art house and Hollywood quality films across genres like comedy, crime, and mystery from 1978 to 1998. Key directors like Woody Allen worked with Orion Pictures during its successful years.
Evaluation group010 task 3
The document discusses production companies, distribution companies, and funding for a hypothetical film. It describes choosing Miramax Films as the production company due to their experience producing similar films. Paramount Pictures is selected as the distribution company for their success distributing comparable genre films. The target budget for the film is £10-20 million, which the creators hope to obtain from Paramount given a promising project.
What's hot (20)
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your
What kind of media institution might distribute your
Viewers also liked
Using LSIS generator to determine the e-maturity of your organisation
The document discusses using the LSIS Generator tool to assess e-maturity. It provides an overview of upcoming developments to the Generator tool, including:
1) Incorporating a new Senior Leadership Module to allow for strategic views and planning.
2) Improving the user experience through upgrades to make the Generator Portal more accessible with improved formatting of case studies and videos.
3) Potential longer term integration with surveys and questionnaires for practitioners and learners.
Technical Forum - November 2013
The document summarizes a technical forum held by the Jisc RSC East Midlands on November 15, 2013. The agenda included presentations on using Spiceworks for network monitoring and inventory management, and using screencasting tools to support users. The forum was intended to enable discussion between technical staff, raise issues, and share best practices. Participants then discussed current issues and shared experiences using various tools like Spiceworks and screencasting software. The next meeting was scheduled for February 13, 2014.
Flipped learning & Flipped CPD
This document outlines a presentation on flipped learning and creating flipped resources for professional development. It discusses the flipped classroom model and benefits of flipped delivery, including flexible access to learning and increased collaboration. Tools are presented for creating flipped resources, including screencasting tools like Screencast-o-Matic and Screenr, as well as software like Camtasia and Jing. Attendees participate in activities to create short guides and tours using Jing. Top tips for effective screencasting are provided. The Regional Support Centre can provide advice on developing online learning resources and using virtual learning environments to support training.
Augmented Reality presentation
Augmented reality (AR) enhances real-world experiences by overlaying digital information such as text, images, video and audio onto the real world. Unlike virtual reality which creates entirely artificial environments, AR layers additional information over real-world settings. Many AR applications are delivered through smartphones, using features like cameras, GPS and compasses to determine location and orientation. Examples include navigation maps, fitness apps, and advertising that activates multimedia when codes are scanned. AR is also being developed for training, gaming, entertainment and advertising through printed materials and digital displays.
Moodle user group 15 03-11
The document discusses new features in Moodle 2 including improved navigation, a new text editor, conditional activities and resources, and minimum requirements for Moodle courses. It also mentions new training materials for Moodle including introductory videos and tutorials, and updates such as the Quickmail block and Google Apps integration. The document appears to be from a Moodle user group meeting covering these topics.
RSC EM Mug 2012 11-13
This document appears to be slides from a presentation on Moodle. The agenda includes discussions on Moodle 2.3 and private files, the lesson module in Moodle 2.2, and a catch up on what attendees have been doing. Additional topics in the presentation include administration of private files, the structured lesson feature, and learning tools interoperability (LTI) which allows integration of external applications into Moodle.
Screencasting
This document summarizes a presentation on screencasting software and its uses. It discusses how screencasting can be used to provide demonstrations, lectures, feedback, and for staff training and marketing. It reviews several free and paid screencasting programs and their features. It provides tips on preparing, rehearsing, and recording an effective screencast. Finally, it discusses possibilities for content that can be covered through screencasting and options for distributing screencasts.
Wbl forum 30th november 2012
The document summarizes a Work Based Learning Forum that took place on November 30th 2012. The forum included discussions on the new OFSTED inspection framework, using data effectively, recruiting apprentices, additional qualifications for apprentices, using voice recorders and speech to text technology, recording workplace learning, learner loan schemes, and various news updates. Presentations were given on topics such as the new OFSTED inspections, using data, and developing virtual learning for apprenticeships.
Evaluating online courses 25 may 2011
This document outlines a presentation about moving learning online and evaluating online courses. It includes slides about introducing online learning, assessing where users are on the online learning spectrum, checklists for assessing online courses, examples of online course materials, the importance of interactivity, and tools for evaluating online courses including a survey monkey template and evaluation tool. The presentation also discusses observing online lessons, formative and summative assessment, staff development programs, and includes references and resources.
Moving Learning Online (MLO) session 4 presentation
The fourth session in the Moving Learning Online series is presented by Amanda Riley and Ben Williams. It explores issues regarding quality improvement, looks at how to assess student achievement, and considers factors that will ensure that resources and infrastructure remain effective and resilient.
Ring of fury instructions
The document provides instructions for playing a game called Ring of Fury. Students write questions on one side of cards and answers on the other. The cards are arranged with questions and answers paired up. Then the answers are shifted down one so the pairs are mixed up. The top mixed pair is kept by the instructor and the rest are handed out randomly to students. A PowerPoint presentation is then used to complete the activity, with rules in the presentation for students.
Evaluation of research and planning 2
This document evaluates the research and planning done for a documentary film project across several blog posts. It provides pros and cons for each blog post's research. The early posts show good initial research through interviewing experts and applying their advice, but lack response and analysis of the information. Later posts demonstrate strong research into narrative theories but may rely too heavily on specific theorists. The final post discussed planning ideas but lacked evidence of the underlying research supporting them. Overall, the research showed potential but response and in-depth analysis of sources was often missing.
Widgat
Widgat is a web based tool for learners with disability. Created by the staff of the Accessibility Centre, Teesside University, with the help of providers and Jisc TechDis.
Form Research 1
This document discusses important considerations for conducting interviews and research for a documentary. It recommends interviewing subjects in a location relevant to their profession and using establishing shots to provide context. The information should be presented in an easily digestible way, like in the documentary "Super Size Me." Pre-planning interviews and ensuring subjects can clearly communicate is also advised. While spontaneity in filming is acceptable, the document stresses the importance of pre-production research to have a vision for the final piece.
Assessing dependent or independent ICT ability in WBL
This tool has emerged from recent LSIS research which has explored the concepts and ability of whether a learner is a dependent or independent learner in ICT, and how can this be assessed.
We recognise that ICT is a changing environment and increasingly learners are assumed to be ICT literate. However, evidence suggests learners differ and if not initially assessed for their ICT ability may experience learning barriers
Mobile devices tresham
Here are the steps to draw and label shapes in Infuse:
1. Tap the "Draw" button to open the drawing tools
2. Select a pen colour and style
3. Tap the screen and drag to draw the desired shape
4. Tap the shape to add text labels
5. Tap the picture icon to add an image
6. Tap the cloud icon to download and insert an image
7. The teacher can ask drawing-based questions that students respond to using the tools.
TA of student presentation
The document analyzes a student's poster about a documentary they created. It notes that the poster effectively relates to the documentary's subject matter through a collage of images representing influences on children's lives. Additionally, close analysis of another individual in the poster determines they are a young female based on their skin and eye makeup. When compared to another Channel 4 poster, similarities in logo placement, caption style, and direct picture relationship to content are observed.
FELTAG update
The Skills Funding Agency clarifies that further education providers are not expected to deliver 10% of all courses entirely online by 2016. Rather, providers should determine where blending online and classroom delivery can improve learning programs. This blended approach can provide learners with more flexible access to education and opportunities to learn at their own pace, developing digital and employability skills.
In brief induction may 2014
This document provides suggestions for using technology to improve the student and staff induction process. It recommends spreading induction activities out before, during, and after the main induction day to avoid information overload. Pre-induction activities could include online familiarization activities and FAQs. The induction day could incorporate mobile-based activities and games. Follow-up activities and information could be provided online and signposted via mobile. Using various technologies can help engage learners and staff while providing essential information in a more digestible manner.
Flipped learning webinar
This document summarizes a presentation on flipped learning given on January 8, 2013. It discusses flipping the traditional classroom model by having students learn new material through online videos before class, then doing homework and having discussions in class. This allows class time to be used for active learning activities. The presentation covered the benefits of flipped learning, such as flexible access and personalized learning. It also provided examples of tools that can be used to create flipped resources and deliver online training through a virtual learning environment.
Viewers also liked (20)
Using LSIS generator to determine the e-maturity of your organisation
Using LSIS generator to determine the e-maturity of your organisation
Moving Learning Online (MLO) session 4 presentation
Moving Learning Online (MLO) session 4 presentation
Assessing dependent or independent ICT ability in WBL
Assessing dependent or independent ICT ability in WBL
Similar to Media CW - Institutions
Evaluation 3
Universal Studios would be the ideal institution to distribute the media group's thriller. As one of the largest American motion picture companies, Universal has a proven track record of commercial and critical success with large films. It is also well-known, which would provide great publicity. Additionally, Universal could help the group develop attractions about the thriller at their theme parks, expanding the film's audience. For these reasons, the group selected Universal Studios as their main distributor and producer.
Evaluation question 3
Revolver Entertainment and Momentum Pictures are suggested as appropriate UK-based independent film distribution companies to distribute the film. Revolver Entertainment has experience distributing thriller films including horror thrillers like House of Last Things. Momentum Pictures previously distributed major horror titles before being acquired but is looking to rebuild recognition. Working with these London-based companies would allow for easier communication and initial UK-only release to gauge critic reception before pursuing worldwide distribution.
Q3
1) The document discusses the pros and cons of distributing a media product through a conglomerate company versus an independent company.
2) The author argues that a conglomerate like Time Warner would be the best choice to distribute their film because conglomerates have larger budgets, experience distributing worldwide, and focus on producing high quality, mass appealing content.
3) Some disadvantages of conglomerate distribution are their potential involvement in production decisions and difficulty getting them initially interested in the project. However, the author believes a conglomerate is required for their film to succeed.
Q3
The document discusses the pros and cons of distributing a media product through a conglomerate company versus an independent company. The author argues that a conglomerate like Time Warner would be the best choice to distribute their film. Conglomerate companies have larger budgets and experience distributing films worldwide. They have a reputation for high quality productions and appealing to mass audiences. Choosing Time Warner could result in greater profits and distribution similar to successful films they have backed like The Dark Knight. While conglomerates may want creative control, the author believes reasonable discussions could limit their influence. Overall, the author feels a conglomerate is needed for the film's success.
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Entertainment Film Distributors would be the most suitable distribution company for the filmmaker's low-budget supernatural horror film. EFD specializes in distributing independent British films and has experience with horror genres like Saw and The Final Destination. They could help the film reach a large audience without a huge budget. StudioCanal UK and EFD both work with small British productions, but EFD may require less money to distribute and promote the film using social media.
Evaluation Question 3
Entertainment Film Distributors would be the most suitable company to distribute the author's movie. As a UK-based independent film distributor specializing in horror genres, they have successfully distributed many low-budget British and international horror films. In contrast, companies like Warner Bros. and Lionsgate focus more on larger-budget Hollywood productions. Fox Searchlight and Momentum Pictures were also considered but Entertainment Film Distributors is the clear best choice given their experience and focus on independent horror films.
What kind of media institution might distribute your media products and why?
The document discusses film distribution and which media institutions might distribute a horror media production. It analyzes the distributors of films like Psycho, Silence of the Lambs, and Insidious - mainly American companies like Paramount Pictures and Orion Pictures. It also looks at British distributors like Artificial Eye, Entertainment, and Lionsgate UK, concluding that Lionsgate UK would be the best choice as it specializes in horror films. Distributing the media production first in movie theaters would generate publicity and interest before releasing it on DVD, online, and television.
Film producers question
A production company is responsible for the physical production of media like films, television, or radio. They raise funds for productions and aim to sell their products to film studios. Castlefield Productions is one such company created by students to produce their film. Universal is a major film production company they partnered with due to its experience and success producing thriller films. Film distributors are responsible for releasing films to the public through cinemas or other releases. They have input into the filmmaking process and work to sell films to buyers who will lease them. Universal was also chosen as the distributor due to its experience and reputation distributing successful thrillers in both the US and UK. Isle of Man Films is a popular UK film funding company that
What kind of media institutions... 2
Lionsgate Films would be the best distributor for a film noir. As the most successful mini-major film studio with a market share of just under $2.9 billion, Lionsgate is known for distributing "dark" films that appeal to film noir audiences. It also takes risks on lower budget films that can gain popularity through word of mouth, as required by the low budget nature and character-driven narratives of film noirs.
Group046
Our film would be well-suited for distribution by New Line Cinema or Universal Pictures due to their experience producing similar conspiracy thriller and action films. New Line Cinema in particular has released prestigious films like Domino and The Butterfly Effect. Universal Pictures founded in 1912 continues to produce thriller hits from the Bourne series to Dawn of the Dead. Additionally, our film could have been funded by sponsorships from companies that provided money in exchange for product placement within the film to help promote their brands.
Media Evaluation - Question 3
This document discusses potential media institutions that could distribute a film product. It explains that a film distributor is responsible for marketing and releasing a film by setting its release date and availability for viewing. The document then notes that the filmmakers have chosen Warner Bros Pictures and Legendary Pictures as the two institutions to distribute their opening sequence. Warner Bros is well-known for action/adventure films and has a style and distribution that fits the film. Legendary Pictures has an agreement to co-produce and co-finance films with Warner Bros.
Media presentatioopn
The document evaluates potential media institutions to distribute a film. Film4 is discussed as a suitable option as it produces a variety of genres, including thrillers, and would get the film recognized in the UK. Metradome is also mentioned as a realistic option for up-and-coming producers as it produces films in a cost-effective manner across all genres. Hammer Films, based in London with US distribution ties, could benefit the film given its history of popular horror films and international distribution. However, distributing via social media or targeting specific audiences through unconventional advertising may also be considered.
Media presentatioopn
The document evaluates potential media institutions to distribute a film. Film4 is suggested as a suitable option as it produces a variety of genres, including thrillers, and would get the film recognized in the UK. Metradome is also discussed as a realistic option for up-and-coming producers as it produces films in a cost-effective manner across all genres. Hammer Films, based in London with US distribution ties, could benefit the film given its history of popular horror films and international distribution. However, distributing via Lions Gate may be difficult given the film's low budget. Hammer Films and online distribution are also mentioned as potential options.
Task3
A production company raises funds to finance film productions. They are responsible for the physical aspects of production and sell their products to film studios. The group created the production company "Killer Production" to represent the death theme in their horror trailer. A film distributor markets and releases films to theaters, DVD, and television to generate revenue. The group chose the distributor Paramount Pictures because it has successfully distributed similar horror films like Cloverfield, which would help promote their new film to that audience.
Task3 killer productions
A production company raises funds to physically produce a film. The group created the production company "Killer Production" to represent the death theme in their trailer. A film distributor publicly releases and markets a film through cinemas, DVDs, and television. The group chose the distributor "Paramount" to release their film because Paramount previously distributed the similar film "Clover Field", which would help promote their production to that audience.
Media institutions OT
Touchstone Pictures and Columbia Pictures would both be suitable media institutions to distribute the film. Touchstone Pictures has had success distributing similar films like Armageddon and Enemy of the State, which involved disaster/environmental themes and genres like government agents/conspiracy that relate to the film. Columbia Pictures is a large global company that distributes both blockbusters and alternative films, and films like Salt and The Da Vinci Code that were similar in genre became very successful. Overall, Touchstone Pictures would be the best choice as a smaller company more appealing for a non-blockbuster, alternative thriller.
Film distribution research simisola adeyemi a2
The document discusses four potential film distribution companies - New Line Cinema, Screen Gems, Universal Studios, and Momentum Pictures - that could distribute the film trailer.
New Line Cinema and Screen Gems are identified as suitable options because they have experience distributing similar genre films. Universal Studios is chosen for its success and fame, though it may prioritize profit over audience needs. Momentum Pictures, while now defunct, could help reach a British fan base, though the trailer may not receive widespread funding or recognition.
what kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
This document discusses different types of media institutions that could distribute an independent film product. It describes production companies, distributors, and limited distributors. Production companies are responsible for fundraising, budgeting, organizing production, and distributing the completed film. Distributors market and release films in theaters or on DVD/Blu-Ray. They work with exhibitors to show films in theaters and receive a percentage of ticket sales. The document also mentions the BFI film fund as a source of funding for independent UK films.
distribuiFilm distribution research
The document discusses several film distribution companies and assesses their suitability for distributing a film trailer. It examines New Line Cinema, Screen Gems, Universal Pictures, and the now defunct Momentum Pictures. New Line Cinema and Universal Pictures are identified as good options given their success distributing similar genres. While Screen Gems also distributes similar films, it focuses more on romance and comedy. Momentum Pictures provided UK and Irish distribution before closing in 2013, but could still reach audiences in those markets.
Film distribution research
1. The document discusses several film distribution companies, including New Line Cinema, Screen Gems, Universal Studios, and Momentum Pictures.
2. New Line Cinema and Screen Gems are described as established distribution companies that have had success marketing horror/thriller and romantic/comedy films respectively.
3. Universal Studios is highlighted for its success distributing major blockbusters like the Fast and Furious and Bourne franchises.
Similar to Media CW - Institutions (20)
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media products and why?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media products and why?
what kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
what kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
More from ddelargy
Evaluation of 4 Research and Planning posts
This document evaluates research and planning resources for a documentary film project. It provides links to helpful interviews and tutorials on documentary filmmaking techniques. However, it also links to articles that are not well researched or analyzed for relevance to the project. While some resources like interviews and tutorials on narrative frameworks and interviewing skills would be useful, other articles focused on current events lack in-depth examination. Overall, the document shows potential resources but needs more analysis and explanation of how sources relate to and inform the planned documentary film.
Evaluation - Radio Tech
The document describes the various technologies used to create a radio trailer, including a school recording studio to record scripted dialogue, Apple Mac and Garageband software to edit the audio files, an external recorder to capture interviews, and Final Cut software to edit and assemble the final trailer. The recording studio, Mac, and Garageband were convenient to use but limited by their location in the school. The external recorder allowed for interviews anywhere but produced lower quality audio and was bulky. Final Cut was familiar software but focused more on video than audio editing and computer access was restricted.
Forms Evaluation
The document discusses various conventions of documentary filmmaking and promotion. It analyzes how a student documentary project adhered to or broke conventions in the documentary's form, poster, and radio trailer. The documentary used handheld footage of civilians and police but broke conventions by not using archival footage or narration. The poster followed conventions but broke others regarding font sizes and colors. The radio trailer met conventions through its voiceover and music but broke them by not using more documentary footage.
Evaluation Question 2; Brand Identity
This document evaluates the effectiveness of connecting ancillary tasks like a radio trailer and poster to the main product of a documentary about Leicester, England.
It finds that the poster clearly associates the documentary with Channel 4 through use of its branding conventions. However, connections could be stronger by including the Channel 4 logo more prominently.
The radio trailer mentions the documentary will be "only on Channel 4" but connections to the One Leicester initiative about improving the city could be made more explicit in the dialogue. Overall, while some brand associations are clear, the links between the tasks and main product could be strengthened.
Storyboards Version 2
Storyboards are a visual planning tool used in film and video production. They consist of a series of illustrations or images displayed in sequence to demonstrate the key scenes, shots, and progression of a proposed motion picture or video production. Storyboards are an essential pre-production element that allows filmmakers to visualize how the final product will be constructed and flow before significant resources are devoted to actual filming.
Initial Storyboards
Initial storyboards were created to plan out the documentary, but the filmmakers acknowledge that the actual production may require changes to the storyboards as new footage is captured that was unexpected and needs to be included, or the order of shots requires editing based on what was actually filmed.
Props and Costumes
This document discusses props and costumes for a documentary filming police and nightlife in Leicester. The film crew will dress casually to blend in, while wearing hidden stab vests for protection. They may interview senior police management in suits, police officers in uniform with props like handcuffs, bouncers in black suits or trousers with communication devices, and club owners either in suits or smart casual clothes. The general public will likely be dressed casually in jeans and t-shirts or dresses.
Final questionnaire
The document summarizes the results of a questionnaire given to 50 people about their perceptions of the police and ideas for a documentary. Key findings include:
- The police uniform is most iconic and should be featured prominently.
- Most people believe the police are doing an adequate job.
- More patrols and police are needed to improve policing in Leicester.
- The documentary should show real footage of police apprehending criminals to provide a balanced perspective.
- Both the police and Leicester should be given equal priority and representation in the documentary and promotional materials.
Final Questionnaire
The document summarizes the results of a questionnaire given to 50 people about their impressions of the police and what should be included in a documentary about policing in Leicester. Key findings include:
- The police uniform is most iconic and represents the police best.
- Most people believe the police are doing an adequate job.
- Respondents felt there should be more police patrols and officers.
- The documentary should show real footage of police apprehending criminals to present a balanced perspective.
- Both a police and Leicester icon should be equally featured on promotional materials.
BFFC
The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) is an independent, non-governmental body that has classified films in the UK since 1912 and videos/DVDs since 1984. It uses age rating categories like U, PG, 12, 15, and 18 to provide guidance on the suitability of films and videos for different age groups. The BBFC applies guidelines for each rating that cover things like violence, language, sex, nudity, drugs and discrimination. Local councils can overrule BBFC decisions for films shown in their area.
Pilot Questionnaire
The document summarizes findings from a pilot questionnaire given to teenagers about their impressions of police. It shows that the teenagers believe police are not good at their jobs and may treat all youths as capable of rioting. However, this could be biased due to recent riots. The youths preferred having a presenter around their age to discuss police work and using archive footage to show past police work. For a radio trailer, the public preferred police explaining their jobs over using interviews, but interviews could still be included. The poster should feature an eye-catching image of a police officer in uniform to draw attention.
Form Research 2
The short documentary will focus on Leicester nightlife and the police who work to keep the public safe. It may be broadcast by the BBC, BFI, or Channel 4 and could also be shown to senior schools to inform them on this topic. Pre-production will involve documenting progress through video diaries and vlogs to record the filmmaking process and get informal interviews.
Textual analysis of super size me poster
The poster depicts the director Morgan Spurlock with McDonald's chips filling his mouth, showing the focus of the documentary on the health effects of excessive fast food. It highlights the critical acclaim the film received by listing awards won and positive quotes from reviews. The bold red and yellow title references McDonald's branding and calls out their former "Super Size" option.
! Source locations !
The document outlines three source locations for a short production: the door that the actor will leave through before needing to use the toilet, the kitchen where some of the action will take place, and the toilet that can be seen through another area.
Media CW - Technologies
The document discusses technologies learned through constructing a media product using Adobe Photoshop and Final Cut software. The author learned how to edit images, create posters, import and edit video clips, apply visual and audio effects, cut clips together, modify sound, and use color correction to maintain consistent lighting across clips filmed at different times. YouTube was also used for research, comparison, and textual analysis of film clips.
Media CW - Attract Target Audience
This document discusses specific media elements that are commonly used in action movies to attract audiences interested in realistic portrayals of criminal activity and law enforcement. It provides examples from films of each element:
1) A stakeout sequence from Bad Boys 2 is used to represent how stakeouts are conducted in real police work and can go wrong.
2) A secret KKK meeting on a pier in Bad Boys 2 mirrors how criminal activity actually takes place in secret locations.
3) The prevalence of firearms in action movies appeals to audiences because guns can dramatically change the pace of a scene from casual to a high-speed shootout.
4) Car chases are commonly seen when criminals flee the scene of a crime
Media cw crags
The document categorizes social groups that characters can belong to, including class, race, age, gender, and sexuality. It analyzes the social groups of five main characters - Oliver Maloney, James Waymont, Will Gent, and Arjun Nayar. All characters are described as middle-class, Caucasian males except for Arjun Nayar who is Asian. Their ages range from 17-18 years old. Gender and sexuality are addressed briefly.
Media CW - Conventions
This document discusses conventions used in the genre of action-comedy films. It summarizes that the film aimed to keep conventions of action films but avoid excessive displays of masculinity. It showed masculinity through characters' actions and words rather than physicality. It also discusses camera techniques used in action sequences, such as a stationary tripod camera rather than a handheld camera to ensure the audience can see what is happening clearly.
More from ddelargy (19)
Media CW - Institutions
- 2. Distribution We had to choose between two distribution companies. The first is Warner Bros. It has been around for over 100 years, and so knows the market well. From it’s birth in 1903, it grew and expanded, and, over the years, a series of mergers and acquisitions have helped Warner Bros. to accumulate a diverse collection of movies, cartoons, and television programs. Examples of this collection include the Harry Potter movies, Space Jam, The Matrix films, the Batman films, Watchmen and Inception. Warner Bros, being both Horizontally and Vertically integrated, and would have been able to distribute our film to not only well known cinemas (such as Odeon or View), but to their own cinemas in the US. If the product gets turned into a DVD, Warner Bros. will be able to distribute that too, as they have done for films before. Or, we could go with a more local Distribution Company; Momentum Pictures. Owned by Alliance Films, it is one of the leading independent motion picture distributors in the UK and Ireland and releases approximately 20 theatrical films a year, with several stv (direct-to-video) releases. It has released films such as 'The King's Speech', 'The Fighter', 'Defiance', and 'District 13: Ultimatum'. In partnership with Cineplex Entertainment, Alliance Films also operates Alliance Cinemas, owner of two Toronto-area theatres. During the MPD era, all materials relating to Alliance Atlantis-distributed films contained a disclaimer stating that Alliance Atlantis was "an indirect limited partner of Motion Picture Distribution LP, not a general partner". However, in fact, the company controlled the general partner of the partnership, and hence effectively controlled the distribution unit itself.
- 3. And the victor is… After much debating, we decided that, ultimately, Momentum Pictures is a lot more local. Therefore, it would be more realistic to have a company closer to home distribute out production. With it’s vertical and horizontal integration, not only would it help us make the product, but it could screen it in it’s own cinema and distribute it to the general public with ease.
- 4. Production Company To produce our media product, we chose DR-Entertainment, a fictional company made from the initials of my partner’s and my first names and the type of area that company would focus on if it were in the real market (entertainment media). Being a small British company, we would neither be vertically nor horizontally integrated, working on donations from the public, money raised through events and funds received from our distributors. Previously, before the Conservatives came to power, we would have recieved funding from the UK Film Council, which has recently been absorbed into the Arts Council under the new Conservative Government.