The document discusses the importance of documenting the software testing process. It outlines that the testing process should be reported on to communicate test results, compare results to design specifications, and highlight problems. The documentation of the testing process should include test requirements, a test plan, test data and expected results, actual test results, and recommendations. Communication is also important and should occur between developers and clients as well as testers and developers. CASE tools can help automate parts of the testing process and generate test data.
Agile Mumbai 2020 Conference | How to get the best ROI on Your Test Automati...AgileNetwork
- Writing automated tests takes a significant amount of time and effort, often resulting in test code that is twice or three times the size of the actual code being tested. This occurs because tests are written in isolation and dependencies must be mocked.
- A better approach is to write tests that focus on behaviors and public interfaces rather than implementation details. Tests should not break when implementation details change, only when public behaviors change. This allows for easier refactoring of code without breaking tests.
- Rather than focusing solely on unit tests, more effort should be put into system level testing which typically finds twice as many bugs. Tests can also be improved by designing them more formally and moving assertions directly into the code being tested.
Testing is most cost effective when done earlier in the software development process. Errors found during the analysis and design stages are cheaper to fix than those discovered later. Various types of test data should be used, including normal, boundary, and exceptional data, to thoroughly test a program. Testing is conducted in phases from unit testing of individual components to system-wide acceptance testing by end users. However, testing can only find bugs but never prove a program is completely error-free.
Test Smarter: Efficient Coverage Metrics That Won't Leave You ExposedSmartBear
Achieving optimum test and requirement coverage is critical for delivering high quality applications to the marketplace. Coverage can be very useful in determining the extent to which code and requirement has been tested. However, at the same time, a high coverage result (something in high 80s or 90s) cannot be taken as a measure of effective testing or an indicator of testers achieving perfection. Leveraging processes and tools that help determine sufficient coverage metrics, account for risk, trim costs incurred from unnecessary tests is therefore important.
In this webinar, Nikhil Kaul, Product Manager, joins Engineer, Rick Almeida, to discuss how to balance the trade-off between achieving high test coverage and testing code and requirements that matter. In this session, we will cover:
What coverage metrics to use and what percentages to aim for?
- How coverage metrics can be misused?
- How to use requirement and code coverage well?
- What metrics won’t tell you?
- Establish the connection between requirement and test coverage.
The document outlines the seven stages of a software development process: analysis, design, implementation, testing, documentation, evaluation, and maintenance. It then discusses the analysis stage in more detail, noting that analysts read and understand the problem, interview clients for clarity, and develop a software specification as a statement of the problem and basis for legal agreement between the analyst and client. Finally, it introduces questioning for requirements of a program to calculate averages, asking about inputs like number of numbers in the set, data types, and output display specifics.
The document discusses various software testing and evaluation techniques used to ensure software solutions meet design specifications and are free from errors. It covers topics like unit testing, integration testing, system testing, black box and white box testing, test data generation, benchmarking, and quality assurance.
These slides quickly illustrate how you can successfully adopt Agile to improve your development efforts. In addition to discussing how and why teams are interested in Agile, it covers some of the challenges of adopting it and suggestions for ensuring success.
Search-based testing of procedural programs:iterative single-target or multi-...Vrije Universiteit Brussel
In the context of testing of Object-Oriented (OO) software systems, researchers have recently proposed search based approaches to automatically generate whole test suites by considering simultaneously all targets (e.g., branches) defined by the coverage criterion (multi-target approach). The goal of whole suite approaches is to overcome the problem of wasting search budget that iterative single-target approaches (which iteratively generate test cases for each target) can encounter in case of infeasible targets. However, whole suite approaches have not been implemented and experimented in the context of procedural programs. In this paper we present OCELOT (Optimal Coverage sEarch-based tooL for sOftware Testing), a test data generation tool for C programs which implements both a state-of-the-art whole suite approach and an iterative single-target approach designed for a parsimonious use of the search budget. We also present an empirical study conducted on 35 open-source C programs to compare the two approaches implemented in OCELOT. The results indicate that the iterative single-target approach provides a higher efficiency while achieving the same or an even higher level of coverage than the whole suite approach.
The document discusses the importance of documenting the software testing process. It outlines that the testing process should be reported on to communicate test results, compare results to design specifications, and highlight problems. The documentation of the testing process should include test requirements, a test plan, test data and expected results, actual test results, and recommendations. Communication is also important and should occur between developers and clients as well as testers and developers. CASE tools can help automate parts of the testing process and generate test data.
Agile Mumbai 2020 Conference | How to get the best ROI on Your Test Automati...AgileNetwork
- Writing automated tests takes a significant amount of time and effort, often resulting in test code that is twice or three times the size of the actual code being tested. This occurs because tests are written in isolation and dependencies must be mocked.
- A better approach is to write tests that focus on behaviors and public interfaces rather than implementation details. Tests should not break when implementation details change, only when public behaviors change. This allows for easier refactoring of code without breaking tests.
- Rather than focusing solely on unit tests, more effort should be put into system level testing which typically finds twice as many bugs. Tests can also be improved by designing them more formally and moving assertions directly into the code being tested.
Testing is most cost effective when done earlier in the software development process. Errors found during the analysis and design stages are cheaper to fix than those discovered later. Various types of test data should be used, including normal, boundary, and exceptional data, to thoroughly test a program. Testing is conducted in phases from unit testing of individual components to system-wide acceptance testing by end users. However, testing can only find bugs but never prove a program is completely error-free.
Test Smarter: Efficient Coverage Metrics That Won't Leave You ExposedSmartBear
Achieving optimum test and requirement coverage is critical for delivering high quality applications to the marketplace. Coverage can be very useful in determining the extent to which code and requirement has been tested. However, at the same time, a high coverage result (something in high 80s or 90s) cannot be taken as a measure of effective testing or an indicator of testers achieving perfection. Leveraging processes and tools that help determine sufficient coverage metrics, account for risk, trim costs incurred from unnecessary tests is therefore important.
In this webinar, Nikhil Kaul, Product Manager, joins Engineer, Rick Almeida, to discuss how to balance the trade-off between achieving high test coverage and testing code and requirements that matter. In this session, we will cover:
What coverage metrics to use and what percentages to aim for?
- How coverage metrics can be misused?
- How to use requirement and code coverage well?
- What metrics won’t tell you?
- Establish the connection between requirement and test coverage.
The document outlines the seven stages of a software development process: analysis, design, implementation, testing, documentation, evaluation, and maintenance. It then discusses the analysis stage in more detail, noting that analysts read and understand the problem, interview clients for clarity, and develop a software specification as a statement of the problem and basis for legal agreement between the analyst and client. Finally, it introduces questioning for requirements of a program to calculate averages, asking about inputs like number of numbers in the set, data types, and output display specifics.
The document discusses various software testing and evaluation techniques used to ensure software solutions meet design specifications and are free from errors. It covers topics like unit testing, integration testing, system testing, black box and white box testing, test data generation, benchmarking, and quality assurance.
These slides quickly illustrate how you can successfully adopt Agile to improve your development efforts. In addition to discussing how and why teams are interested in Agile, it covers some of the challenges of adopting it and suggestions for ensuring success.
Search-based testing of procedural programs:iterative single-target or multi-...Vrije Universiteit Brussel
In the context of testing of Object-Oriented (OO) software systems, researchers have recently proposed search based approaches to automatically generate whole test suites by considering simultaneously all targets (e.g., branches) defined by the coverage criterion (multi-target approach). The goal of whole suite approaches is to overcome the problem of wasting search budget that iterative single-target approaches (which iteratively generate test cases for each target) can encounter in case of infeasible targets. However, whole suite approaches have not been implemented and experimented in the context of procedural programs. In this paper we present OCELOT (Optimal Coverage sEarch-based tooL for sOftware Testing), a test data generation tool for C programs which implements both a state-of-the-art whole suite approach and an iterative single-target approach designed for a parsimonious use of the search budget. We also present an empirical study conducted on 35 open-source C programs to compare the two approaches implemented in OCELOT. The results indicate that the iterative single-target approach provides a higher efficiency while achieving the same or an even higher level of coverage than the whole suite approach.
Test cases are documents that contain test data, preconditions, test steps, expected results, and postconditions to verify a specific requirement. They provide a starting point for test execution and leave the system in a defined state. Good test cases are accurate, economical, traceable, repeatable, reusable, simple, objective, relevant, avoid duplication and dependency. Test cases should be written based on requirements documents and cover both positive and negative scenarios using clear language. An ideal test case includes an ID, use case ID, test objective, preconditions, test data, test steps, expected results, actual results, cycle, date, tester, status, severity, and resolution status.
On Parameter Tuning in Search-Based Software Engineering: A Replicated Empiri...Abdel Salam Sayyad
The document summarizes a study that replicated an earlier empirical study on parameter tuning in search-based software engineering. The original study found that different parameter settings can significantly impact performance and that default parameter settings do not always perform optimally. The replication confirmed these findings, and also found that default settings generally performed poorly compared to best tuned settings. The replication also found that IBEA's best tuned performance was generally better than NSGA-II's best tuned performance. Additionally, parameter tuning on a sample of problems did not necessarily lead to the best settings for a new problem, but was generally better than default settings.
A brief overview of the different software testing methods is provided, analysing the main aspects of black-box, white-box and grey-box techniques.
Experienced-based testing is also mentioned.
The document discusses common software problems, objectives of testing, and different levels of testing. The most common software problems include incorrect calculations, data issues, and incorrect processing. Objectives of testing are to find errors, ensure requirements are met, and check the software is fit for purpose. There are different levels of testing including unit testing of individual functions, integration testing of modules, system testing of the full system, and acceptance testing. White box and black box testing approaches are also described.
On the application of SAT solvers for Search Based Software Testingjfrchicanog
The document discusses using SAT solvers to solve optimization problems in search-based software testing. It introduces optimization problems and techniques like metaheuristics and evolutionary algorithms. The document then focuses on applying SAT solvers to the test suite minimization problem, which aims to minimize the number of tests needed to achieve full code coverage. It describes translating the optimization problem into a SAT instance that can be solved by SAT solvers to obtain optimal solutions.
All you need to know about regression testing | David TzemachDavid Tzemach
All you need to know about Regression testing| David Tzemach
1. Overview
2. What is “Regression” testing…?
3. When should you use it..?
4. How to implement..?
5. Test Recommendations
6. Considerations when building Regression tests
Design patterns are formalized best practices for solving common programming problems. They show relationships between classes and objects to address recurring design problems, but are not finished designs that can be directly converted to code. Design patterns provide reusable solutions to software design problems in specific contexts, and examples include strategy, computation, execution, implementation, and structural patterns.
Formal methods involve mathematically-based techniques for specifying, developing, and verifying software and hardware systems. They use formal languages and logic to create unambiguous and precise descriptions that can be analyzed for consistency and correctness. Formal methods can be applied at different levels of rigor, from using some mathematical notation in English specifications to fully formal machine-checked proofs. While useful for complex, safety-critical systems, formal methods need not be applied to every component or phase of development in order to provide benefits like error detection.
The document compares an advanced test engineer to a novice test engineer. An advanced test engineer executes tests from an end user perspective and provides additional testing coverage using product and domain knowledge. They are connected to real users and observe market conditions. A novice test engineer only executes assigned tests from the office without considering different environments or user perspectives.
Keynote, Google Test Automation Conference. Hyderabad, India, October 28, 2010.
Overview of software testability and implications for managers, developers, and testers. Discusses six aspects: process, requirements, design, white-box, black-box, and test tooling. Shows that testers are not typically in control of these aspects, which leads to sub-optimal software development outcomes.
This document provides an overview of software testing concepts and processes. It discusses why testing is important, defines common testing terms, and outlines the typical phases of a testing lifecycle including planning, analysis, implementation, evaluation, and closure. It also describes different testing techniques like static reviews, functional testing, and performance testing. Risks of poor quality like defects, failures, and their impacts on humans, economy, business are highlighted. The roles of testers and differences between quality assurance and quality control are defined. Examples of testing in various industries are provided.
The document discusses present problems and future solutions for software testing. It notes that science fiction ideas often become reality and proposes several futuristic testing ideas that could one day exist, such as self-testing code, integrated software monitoring systems, and automated distributed testing services. It also outlines challenges in testing like determining when enough testing has been done, estimating testing time, and getting developers involved in testing. The document envisions an integrated testing environment that maps requirements, design, code, and tests to automate much of the testing process.
This document summarizes a seminar presentation on software testing. It discusses:
- The importance of testing in finding errors and making software more reliable
- How testing consumes the largest effort in software development
- The key concepts of testing including test cases, test suites, errors, and failures
- The different levels of testing like unit, integration, system, and acceptance testing
- Techniques for white box, black box, and grey box testing based on knowledge of the internal workings
This document discusses exploratory testing and compares it to scripted manual testing. Exploratory testing emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of individual testers to continually optimize their work. It involves simultaneous learning, test design, and test execution while adapting tests as they are performed. Some key advantages are that it encourages creativity and finding bugs quickly, while disadvantages include relying on tester skills and knowledge. Different types of exploratory testing are described, as well as when it should be applied and examples from Microsoft, Adobe, and Philips.
This document outlines the key steps for effective project execution, including problem selection, requirement analysis, design, implementation, testing, defect handling, benchmarking, standard compliance, and reporting. It emphasizes teamwork, contributing value to the project, and gaining practical experience through applying the knowledge learned.
These slides provide the high-level results of our comparison of FxCop and the Coverity platform. We used a third party codebase of approx. 100k lines of code and analyzed it using the "fxcop" from Visual Studio 2013 and Coverity 6.6. Perhaps most surprising is how the two solutions (both static analysis tools for C# that aim to improve quality and security) are so different and yet so complementary.
Regression testing is testing performed after changes to a system to detect whether new errors were introduced or old bugs have reappeared. It should be done after changes to requirements, new features added, defect fixes, or performance improvements. There are various strategies for regression testing including re-running all tests, test selection, test prioritization, and focusing on areas like frequently failing tests or recently changed code. While regression testing helps ensure system quality, managing large test suites over time can be challenging. Automating regression testing helps address these challenges.
Make the Most of Your Time: How Should the Analyst Work with Automated Tracea...Tim Menzies
The document discusses requirements traceability and how analysts can work efficiently with automated traceability tools. It presents the results of two experimental studies that evaluated the impact of different analyst behaviors - including with/without feedback and global vs local ordering - on precision, recall, and effort when developing requirements traceability matrices. The most efficient behaviors were local ordering with feedback, as they resulted in the highest precision and recall while examining the fewest candidate links.
The importance and seriousness of Software Testing is well known. Much has been discussed and evaluated and the bottom line is that mistakes happen generally because humans tend to overlook possibilities and probable errors. A software not tested with due seriousness can lead to major blunders putting the clients of the systems into a tight spot and resulting in nightmares of sort. It is then only prudent and wise to analyze and predict errors and conduct timely rectifications to avoid any embarrassing situations in the future and to deliver a stable and reliable system.
Like many other things, there are Myths surrounding Software Testing Services, but Facts remain Facts.
Read More At: http://softwaretestingsolution.com/blog/the-myths-and-facts-surrounding-software-testing/
This document covers a lecture on compound propositions and logical operators in discrete structures. It defines logical operators such as negation, conjunction, disjunction, exclusive or, implication, and biconditional. It provides truth tables for each operator and examples of how to write compound propositions using the operators. De Morgan's laws and their applications are discussed. The concepts of tautology, contradiction, logical equivalence and various laws of logic are also introduced.
This document provides an introduction to Java for beginners, explaining that Java is an object-oriented programming language. It outlines the main editions of Java including Java SE for standalone applications, Java EE for business solutions, and Java ME for embedded systems. The document encourages learning more about Java programming from this introductory guide.
Test cases are documents that contain test data, preconditions, test steps, expected results, and postconditions to verify a specific requirement. They provide a starting point for test execution and leave the system in a defined state. Good test cases are accurate, economical, traceable, repeatable, reusable, simple, objective, relevant, avoid duplication and dependency. Test cases should be written based on requirements documents and cover both positive and negative scenarios using clear language. An ideal test case includes an ID, use case ID, test objective, preconditions, test data, test steps, expected results, actual results, cycle, date, tester, status, severity, and resolution status.
On Parameter Tuning in Search-Based Software Engineering: A Replicated Empiri...Abdel Salam Sayyad
The document summarizes a study that replicated an earlier empirical study on parameter tuning in search-based software engineering. The original study found that different parameter settings can significantly impact performance and that default parameter settings do not always perform optimally. The replication confirmed these findings, and also found that default settings generally performed poorly compared to best tuned settings. The replication also found that IBEA's best tuned performance was generally better than NSGA-II's best tuned performance. Additionally, parameter tuning on a sample of problems did not necessarily lead to the best settings for a new problem, but was generally better than default settings.
A brief overview of the different software testing methods is provided, analysing the main aspects of black-box, white-box and grey-box techniques.
Experienced-based testing is also mentioned.
The document discusses common software problems, objectives of testing, and different levels of testing. The most common software problems include incorrect calculations, data issues, and incorrect processing. Objectives of testing are to find errors, ensure requirements are met, and check the software is fit for purpose. There are different levels of testing including unit testing of individual functions, integration testing of modules, system testing of the full system, and acceptance testing. White box and black box testing approaches are also described.
On the application of SAT solvers for Search Based Software Testingjfrchicanog
The document discusses using SAT solvers to solve optimization problems in search-based software testing. It introduces optimization problems and techniques like metaheuristics and evolutionary algorithms. The document then focuses on applying SAT solvers to the test suite minimization problem, which aims to minimize the number of tests needed to achieve full code coverage. It describes translating the optimization problem into a SAT instance that can be solved by SAT solvers to obtain optimal solutions.
All you need to know about regression testing | David TzemachDavid Tzemach
All you need to know about Regression testing| David Tzemach
1. Overview
2. What is “Regression” testing…?
3. When should you use it..?
4. How to implement..?
5. Test Recommendations
6. Considerations when building Regression tests
Design patterns are formalized best practices for solving common programming problems. They show relationships between classes and objects to address recurring design problems, but are not finished designs that can be directly converted to code. Design patterns provide reusable solutions to software design problems in specific contexts, and examples include strategy, computation, execution, implementation, and structural patterns.
Formal methods involve mathematically-based techniques for specifying, developing, and verifying software and hardware systems. They use formal languages and logic to create unambiguous and precise descriptions that can be analyzed for consistency and correctness. Formal methods can be applied at different levels of rigor, from using some mathematical notation in English specifications to fully formal machine-checked proofs. While useful for complex, safety-critical systems, formal methods need not be applied to every component or phase of development in order to provide benefits like error detection.
The document compares an advanced test engineer to a novice test engineer. An advanced test engineer executes tests from an end user perspective and provides additional testing coverage using product and domain knowledge. They are connected to real users and observe market conditions. A novice test engineer only executes assigned tests from the office without considering different environments or user perspectives.
Keynote, Google Test Automation Conference. Hyderabad, India, October 28, 2010.
Overview of software testability and implications for managers, developers, and testers. Discusses six aspects: process, requirements, design, white-box, black-box, and test tooling. Shows that testers are not typically in control of these aspects, which leads to sub-optimal software development outcomes.
This document provides an overview of software testing concepts and processes. It discusses why testing is important, defines common testing terms, and outlines the typical phases of a testing lifecycle including planning, analysis, implementation, evaluation, and closure. It also describes different testing techniques like static reviews, functional testing, and performance testing. Risks of poor quality like defects, failures, and their impacts on humans, economy, business are highlighted. The roles of testers and differences between quality assurance and quality control are defined. Examples of testing in various industries are provided.
The document discusses present problems and future solutions for software testing. It notes that science fiction ideas often become reality and proposes several futuristic testing ideas that could one day exist, such as self-testing code, integrated software monitoring systems, and automated distributed testing services. It also outlines challenges in testing like determining when enough testing has been done, estimating testing time, and getting developers involved in testing. The document envisions an integrated testing environment that maps requirements, design, code, and tests to automate much of the testing process.
This document summarizes a seminar presentation on software testing. It discusses:
- The importance of testing in finding errors and making software more reliable
- How testing consumes the largest effort in software development
- The key concepts of testing including test cases, test suites, errors, and failures
- The different levels of testing like unit, integration, system, and acceptance testing
- Techniques for white box, black box, and grey box testing based on knowledge of the internal workings
This document discusses exploratory testing and compares it to scripted manual testing. Exploratory testing emphasizes the freedom and responsibility of individual testers to continually optimize their work. It involves simultaneous learning, test design, and test execution while adapting tests as they are performed. Some key advantages are that it encourages creativity and finding bugs quickly, while disadvantages include relying on tester skills and knowledge. Different types of exploratory testing are described, as well as when it should be applied and examples from Microsoft, Adobe, and Philips.
This document outlines the key steps for effective project execution, including problem selection, requirement analysis, design, implementation, testing, defect handling, benchmarking, standard compliance, and reporting. It emphasizes teamwork, contributing value to the project, and gaining practical experience through applying the knowledge learned.
These slides provide the high-level results of our comparison of FxCop and the Coverity platform. We used a third party codebase of approx. 100k lines of code and analyzed it using the "fxcop" from Visual Studio 2013 and Coverity 6.6. Perhaps most surprising is how the two solutions (both static analysis tools for C# that aim to improve quality and security) are so different and yet so complementary.
Regression testing is testing performed after changes to a system to detect whether new errors were introduced or old bugs have reappeared. It should be done after changes to requirements, new features added, defect fixes, or performance improvements. There are various strategies for regression testing including re-running all tests, test selection, test prioritization, and focusing on areas like frequently failing tests or recently changed code. While regression testing helps ensure system quality, managing large test suites over time can be challenging. Automating regression testing helps address these challenges.
Make the Most of Your Time: How Should the Analyst Work with Automated Tracea...Tim Menzies
The document discusses requirements traceability and how analysts can work efficiently with automated traceability tools. It presents the results of two experimental studies that evaluated the impact of different analyst behaviors - including with/without feedback and global vs local ordering - on precision, recall, and effort when developing requirements traceability matrices. The most efficient behaviors were local ordering with feedback, as they resulted in the highest precision and recall while examining the fewest candidate links.
The importance and seriousness of Software Testing is well known. Much has been discussed and evaluated and the bottom line is that mistakes happen generally because humans tend to overlook possibilities and probable errors. A software not tested with due seriousness can lead to major blunders putting the clients of the systems into a tight spot and resulting in nightmares of sort. It is then only prudent and wise to analyze and predict errors and conduct timely rectifications to avoid any embarrassing situations in the future and to deliver a stable and reliable system.
Like many other things, there are Myths surrounding Software Testing Services, but Facts remain Facts.
Read More At: http://softwaretestingsolution.com/blog/the-myths-and-facts-surrounding-software-testing/
This document covers a lecture on compound propositions and logical operators in discrete structures. It defines logical operators such as negation, conjunction, disjunction, exclusive or, implication, and biconditional. It provides truth tables for each operator and examples of how to write compound propositions using the operators. De Morgan's laws and their applications are discussed. The concepts of tautology, contradiction, logical equivalence and various laws of logic are also introduced.
This document provides an introduction to Java for beginners, explaining that Java is an object-oriented programming language. It outlines the main editions of Java including Java SE for standalone applications, Java EE for business solutions, and Java ME for embedded systems. The document encourages learning more about Java programming from this introductory guide.
Discrete Mathematics is a branch of mathematics involving discrete elements that uses algebra and arithmetic. It is increasingly being applied in the practical fields of mathematics and computer science. It is a very good tool for improving reasoning and problem-solving capabilities.
Discrete mathematics Ch2 Propositional Logic_Dr.khaled.Bakro د. خالد بكروDr. Khaled Bakro
Discrete Mathematics chapter 2 covers propositional logic. A proposition is a statement that is either true or false. Propositional logic uses propositional variables and logical operators like negation, conjunction, disjunction, implication and biconditional. Truth tables are used to determine the truth value of compound propositions formed using these operators. Logical equivalences between compound propositions can be shown using truth tables or by applying equivalence rules.
The document discusses translating natural language statements into propositional logic by identifying logical structures like negation, conjunction, disjunction, etc. It provides examples of translating statements involving negation (e.g. "Bill does not own a car"), conjunction (e.g. "Jenny went to the park and Bill went to the park"), disjunction (e.g. "Either my roommate will bring the textbook or my lab partner will let me borrow hers"), and discusses how to properly capture meaning and logical relationships. Key concepts covered are using variables to represent propositions, appropriate use of logical operators, and handling collective subjects, temporal sequences, and additive comparisons.
This document provides an introduction to parliamentary debate. It outlines the basic formats, including the British and Asian styles. It describes the roles and speaking order of the prime minister, leader of opposition, and other speakers on both sides. It also defines key terms like definitions, rebuttals, and points of information. Motions can be open, semi-closed, or closed and abbreviations are used to indicate the stance. The roles, timing, and essential elements of an effective speech are explained.
This document defines logical propositions, statements, and logical operations such as negation, conjunction, disjunction, implication, equivalence, and quantification. Propositions can be combined using logical operations to form compound statements. Truth tables are used to evaluate compound statements based on the truth values of the component propositions. Logical properties such as commutativity, associativity, distributivity, idempotence and negation are also discussed.
The document discusses truth tables and logical connectives such as conjunction, disjunction, negation, implication and biconditionals. It provides examples of truth tables for compound propositions involving multiple variables. De Morgan's laws are explained, which state that the negation of a conjunction is the disjunction of the negations, and the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction of the negations. The concepts of tautologies, contradictions and logical equivalence are also covered.
Truth tables complete and p1 of short methodNat Karablina
The document discusses truth tables and how to use partial truth tables (also called the short method) to evaluate sentences. Some key points:
- Truth tables determine the truth values of sentences based on the truth values of their parts and connectives like negation, conjunction, disjunction, conditional, biconditional.
- To show a sentence is a tautology or contradiction requires a full truth table, but only one line is needed to show it is not a tautology/contradiction.
- The short method constructs a partial truth table to evaluate sentences more efficiently in some cases, like showing a sentence is contingent by having one line with true and one with false.
- For tasks like
The document discusses propositional logic and truth tables. It defines statements as sentences that are either true or false. Examples of statements and non-statements are provided. The main logical connectives - and, or, if-then, if and only if, negation - are explained along with their symbols. Examples are given to illustrate how to determine the truth value of statements using truth tables for connectives involving two or more statements. The concepts of equivalent statements, tautologies, and using contradiction to check for tautologies are also explained with examples.
This document provides an overview of mathematical logic. It defines key concepts such as propositions, truth values, logical connectives like negation, conjunction, disjunction, implication, biconditional, and quantifiers. Propositions are statements that can be either true or false. Logical connectives combine propositions and quantifiers specify whether statements apply to all or some cases. Truth tables are used to determine the truth values of statements combined with logical connectives. The document also discusses predicates, universal and existential quantification, and DeMorgan's laws relating negation and quantification.
Propositional calculus (also called propositional logic, sentential calculus, sentential logic, or sometimes zeroth-order logic) is the branch of logic concerned with the study of propositions (whether they are true or false) that are formed by other propositions with the use of logical connectives, and how their value depends on the truth value of their components. Logical connectives are found in natural languages.
This lecture covers propositional equivalences like tautology and contradiction, logical equivalences that have the same truth values, De Morgan's law, and predicates and quantifiers. Predicates assign properties to variables, and quantifiers like the universal and existential quantifier specify whether a property holds for all or some variables. The lecture also discusses binding variables and nested quantified expressions.
Chapter 1 Logic of Compound Statementsguestd166eb5
This document introduces basic concepts in propositional logic and discrete mathematics including:
- Statements and their truth values
- Logical connectives such as negation, conjunction, disjunction, implication, biconditional
- Compound statements formed using logical connectives
- Truth tables to determine the truth values of compound statements
- Tautologies, contradictions and contingencies
- Negation, contrapositive, converse and inverse of conditional statements
- De Morgan's laws of negation for conjunction and disjunction
Examples are provided to illustrate key concepts and definitions throughout.
This document introduces some basic concepts in propositional logic. It defines propositional logic as the study of how simple propositions combine to form more complex propositions. It discusses statements as descriptions that can be true or false, and provides examples. It also introduces logical connectives like negation, conjunction, disjunction, implication and biconditional, and shows how they combine atomic propositions into compound propositions. Truth tables are provided to illustrate the truth values of compound propositions formed with different connectives.
The document provides an overview of propositional logic including:
1. It defines statements, logical connectives, and truth tables. Logical connectives like negation, conjunction, disjunction and others are explained.
2. It discusses various logical concepts like tautology, contradiction, contingency, logical equivalence, and logical implications.
3. It outlines propositional logic rules and properties including commutative, associative, distributive, De Morgan's laws, identity law, idempotent law, and transitive rule.
4. It provides an example of using truth tables to test the validity of an argument about bachelors dying young.
The document discusses various concepts related to software errors, faults, failures, and testing. It defines that an error is made during development, a fault is the manifestation of an error in the code, and a failure occurs when the fault is triggered. Testing involves exercising the software with test cases to find failures or demonstrate correct execution. There are two main approaches to identifying test cases - functional testing based on specifications and structural testing based on code. Both approaches are needed to fully test the software.
Software testing techniques document discusses various software testing methods like unit testing, integration testing, system testing, white box testing, black box testing, performance testing, stress testing, and scalability testing. It provides definitions and characteristics of each method. Some key points made in the document include that unit testing tests individual classes, integration testing tests class interactions, system testing validates functionality, and performance testing evaluates how the system performs under varying loads.
This document discusses unit testing and mock frameworks. It defines common terms like unit test, fake, stub, and mock. It describes the strengths and weaknesses of unit testing. It then introduces TypeMock as a mock framework that can fake static, sealed, or non-public elements without requiring design changes for testability. The document also briefly debates the pros and cons of dictating design for testability and mentions some research on the benefits of test-driven development.
Unit testing is a method where developers write code to test individual units or components of an application to determine if they are working as intended. The document discusses various aspects of unit testing including:
- What unit testing is and why it is important for finding defects early in development.
- Common unit testing techniques like statement coverage, branch coverage, and path coverage which aim to test all possible paths through the code.
- How unit testing fits into the software development lifecycle and is typically done by developers before handing code over for formal testing.
- Popular unit testing frameworks for different programming languages like JUnit for Java and NUnit for .NET.
The document provides examples to illustrate white box testing techniques
The document discusses various topics related to software testing including:
1) Phases in a tester's mental life from debugging-oriented to prevention-oriented.
2) Types of testing like unit testing, integration testing, and system testing.
3) Limitations of testing including inability to test every path or condition.
4) Consequences of bugs ranging from mild to catastrophic based on factors like frequency and correction cost.
An introduction to Software Testing and Test ManagementAnuraj S.L
The document provides an introduction to software testing and test management. It discusses key concepts like quality, software testing definitions, why testing is important, who does testing, what needs to be tested, when testing is done, and testing standards. It also covers testing methodologies like black box and white box testing and different levels of testing like unit testing, integration testing, and system testing. The document is intended to give a basic overview of software testing and related topics.
How to Actually DO High-volume Automated TestingTechWell
This document summarizes a presentation on high-volume automated testing (HiVAT). Cem Kaner and Carol Oliver will present on techniques for doing HiVAT testing, including examples implemented in Ruby code. They will describe three HiVAT techniques - functional equivalence testing, long-sequence regression testing, and a more flexible HiVAT architecture. The presentation will cover the basic ingredients needed for HiVAT, examples of the techniques, and ideas for making HiVAT work in practice.
This document provides an overview of software testing at different levels. It discusses unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing. Unit testing validates individual code modules, integration testing validates how modules are combined based on the design, system testing ensures all requirements are met when the full system is integrated, and acceptance testing is done by the customer. The document also covers topics like test-driven development, black box vs white box testing, and strategies for integration testing like top-down and bottom-up.
The IEEE 1633 provides practical guidance for developing reliable software and making key decisions that include reliability. There are qualitative and quantitative tasks starting from the beginning of the program until deployment. These methods are applicable for agile and incremental development environments. In fact, they work better in an agile environment. This document has practical step by step instructions for how to identify failure modes and root cause, identify risks that are often overlooked, predict defects before the code is even written, plan staffing levels for testing and support, evaluate reliability during testing, and make a release decision. Examples of the techniques are provided. This document was written by people who have real world experience in making software more reliable while still on time and within budget. It covers software failure modes effects analysis, software fault trees, software defect root cause analysis, reliability predictions, defect density predictions, software reliability benchmarking, software reliability growth estimation, developing a reliability driven test suite, allocating reliability to software, evaluating the portion of the total system failures that will be caused by the software, and managing software for reliability. The working group is chaired by Ann Marie Neufelder who is the global leader in reliable software. The document will be updated in 2023 for the Common Defect Enumeration and relationship with DevSecOps.
The table ranks 10 features of a traffic light system based on their likelihood of failure and impact of failure, assigning each a priority number. It considers things like the push button, getting the time, turning lights on and off, and sounds. Higher priority numbers indicate features that are more likely to fail or would have a greater impact if they did fail, like correctly sequencing the lights.
Unit 8 discusses software testing concepts including definitions of testing, who performs testing, test characteristics, levels of testing, and testing approaches. Unit testing focuses on individual program units while integration testing combines units. System testing evaluates a complete integrated system. Testing strategies integrate testing into a planned series of steps from requirements to deployment. Verification ensures correct development while validation confirms the product meets user needs.
Slides from Software Testing Techniques course offered at Kansas State University in Spring'16 and Spring'17. Entire course material can be found at https://github.com/rvprasad/software-testing-course.
This document provides an overview of software testing and debugging. It discusses the definitions and purposes of testing and debugging. Testing is the process of verifying that a system meets specified requirements, while debugging is the process of finding and fixing errors in source code. The document then covers various topics related to software testing such as the phases of a tester's work, the goals and dichotomies of testing versus debugging, models for testing, consequences of bugs, taxonomies of bugs, and test metrics.
What is testing?
“An empirical, technical investigation conducted to provide stakeholders with information about the quality of the product under test.”
- Cem Kaner
This document discusses test coverage metrics in test-driven development (TDD). It defines common coverage metrics like statement coverage and branch coverage and explains mutation coverage in more detail. Mutation coverage involves making small changes to code to generate mutants and measuring whether tests can detect the changes. The document also lists some popular tools for measuring test coverage and mutation coverage. It observes that coverage metrics are relevant for TDD and mutation coverage specifically tells if aspects of code are truly tested.
This ppt covers the following
A strategic approach to testing
Test strategies for conventional software
Test strategies for object-oriented software
Validation testing
System testing
The art of debugging
The document provides guidelines for an annotated bibliography assignment aimed at increasing nursing students' knowledge of leadership in nursing practice. Students will select five nurse leaders to research and write one-page summaries for each leader. Each summary must include the leader's roles and responsibilities, accomplishments, barriers to achieving goals, and knowledge gained from reading about the leader. The assignment will help prepare students for a poster presentation on nursing leadership.
Similar to MDD and the Tautology Problem: Discussion Notes. (20)
How to Release Rock-solid RESTful APIs and Ice the Testing BackBlobBob Binder
REST APIs are a key enabling technology for the cloud. Mobile applications, service-oriented architecture, and the Internet of Things depend on reliable and usable REST APIs. Unlike browser, native, and mobile apps, REST APIs can only be tested with software that drives the APIs. Unlike developer-centric hand-coded unit testing, adequate testing of REST APIs is truly well-suited to advanced automated testing.
As most web service applications are developed following an Agile process, effective testing must also avoid the "testing backblob," in which work to maintain hand-coded BDD-style test suites exceeds available time after a few iterations.
This talk presents a methodology for developing and testing REST APIs using model-based automation that has the beneficial side-effect of shrinking the testing backblob.
Lessons learned validating 60,000 pages of api documentationBob Binder
The document discusses lessons learned from validating over 60,000 pages of API documentation at Microsoft. It provides an overview of Microsoft's protocol quality assurance process, which included developing model-based test suites to validate technical documentation against actual Windows services. Key aspects of the process included requirements engineering to derive testable requirements from documentation statements, modeling protocol behavior, and using the Spec Explorer tool to automatically generate and execute test cases from the models. The process uncovered over 50,000 issues in the documentation, most before test execution, and helped close an antitrust case regarding Microsoft's interoperability documentation.
Model-based Testing: Taking BDD/ATDD to the Next LevelBob Binder
Slides from presentation at the Chicago Quality Assurance Association, February 25, 2014.
Acceptance Test Driven Development (ATDD) and Behavior Driven Development (BDD) are well-established Agile practices that rely on the knowledge and intuition of testers, product owners, and developers to identify and then translate statements into test suites. But the resulting test suites often cover only a small slice of happy-path behavior. And, as a BDD specification and its associated test code base grows over time, work to maintain it either crowds out new development and testing or, typically, is simply ignored. Either is high-risk. That’s how Agile teams get eaten by the testing BackBlob.Model Based Testing is a tool-based approach to automate the creation of test cases. This presentation will outline the techniques and benefits of MBT, and show how model-based testing can address both problems. A detailed demo of Spec Explorer, a free model-based testing tool shows how a model is constructed and used to create and maintain a test suite.
Keynote, ETSI Model-Based Testing User Conference. Tallinn, Estonia September 27, 2012.
High-level discussion of model-based testing and trends driving software/system reliability. Explains how emergent behavior in complex systems ("dragon kings") causes catastrophic failures. My Multi-dimensional testing strategy can reveal this hard to find bugs/failure modes, but this requires a better approach to model-based testing. Overview: Is software eating the world? Bugs, Black Swans, Dragon Kings. Multi-dimensional Testing. Challenges.
Popular Delusions, Crowds, and the Coming Deluge: end of the Oracle?Bob Binder
Invited Talk at the 20th CREST Open Workshop, The Oracle Problem for Automated Software Testing. University College of London. May 21, 2012
Pragmatic Innovations for test oracles, a new Oracle Taxonomy, Characterization of test oracles, Challenges.
Invited Talk, ISSTA 2nd International Workshop on End-to-end Test Script Engineering
July 16, 2012, Minneapolis.
Limitations of x-unit testing framework, MTS testing framework that combined test objects with procedural aspects of TTCN.
Achieving Very High Reliability for Ubiquitous Information Technology Bob Binder
1) The document discusses achieving very high reliability for ubiquitous information technology through full test automation.
2) It outlines the new IT reality of growing usage, mobility, and need for high reliability of "five nines" or 99.999% uptime.
3) The strategy proposed is taking a full end-to-end testing approach through automated test generation and execution to achieve the reliability needed for ubiquitous IT to scale to millions of users.
The Tester’s Dashboard: Release Decision SupportBob Binder
The document discusses metrics for supporting release decisions based on model-based testing. It describes using an operational profile to generate test cases, calculating model coverage metrics, using a reliability demonstration chart to assess risk, and measuring relative proximity to compare expected and actual failure rates. A case study applies these methods to a word processing app and missile defense system. Key observations are that model coverage ensures sufficient testing, reliability demonstration charts assume flat profiles which may be optimistic, and relative proximity indicates when failure intensities match expectations.
Performance Testing Mobile and Multi-Tier ApplicationsBob Binder
Invited Talk, Chicago Quality Assurance Association, Chicago, June 26, 2007. Overview of performance testing strategy for handheld devices and multi-tier systems.
The document discusses lessons learned from testing object-oriented systems. It covers the state of the art in object-oriented test design, automation, and representation. It also examines the state of the practice, finding that the best organizations implement systematic testing at multiple scopes from classes to subsystems. With rigorous testing following design patterns, world-class quality below 0.025 defects per function point is achievable.
The document provides an overview of mVerify Corporation and its mobile testing solution called MTS. MTS aims to address the challenges of testing mobile applications by providing a platform that can simulate millions of users and configurations to thoroughly test apps. The solution slashes testing time and costs while improving reliability and performance. mVerify has seen early traction and seeks funding to further develop the platform and expand its customer base and sales.
Juniper Networks Ignite! Testing Conference. Sunnyvale California, November 9, 2011.
Overview of model-based testing. Two case studies. Thumbnail introduction to fee and free MBT tools.
Keynote, ISSRE-13, St. Malo, France, November 4, 2004.
Outline: 21st Century IT Trends, Mobile Technology Crisis, Test Effectiveness Levels, Level 4 Case Study, Reliability Arithmetic, Test Performance Envelope.
This document discusses factors that affect testability and strategies for improving testability. It defines testability as the ability to produce tests to verify complex systems. Higher testability allows for more effective testing with the same resources. The document identifies controllability and observability as the main factors that determine a system's testability. It provides examples of how characteristics like complexity, non-determinism, and lack of visibility into state diminish testability. Techniques for improving testability include adding points of control and observation, using state test helpers, building tests into the system, and designing for well-structured and deterministic code.
The document discusses mVerify's Test Objects framework for automated software testing. It was presented at the 2006 Google Test Automation Conference. The framework was influenced by TTCN-3 and XUnit testing frameworks and aims to generate test objects from models, support distributed testing across platforms, and make testing intuitive through one-click repetition and smart progress bars. A demo was presented to illustrate these capabilities.
WTS is a mobile systems verification tool that allows for end-to-end automated testing of wireless applications on thousands of simulated personal digital assistants (PDAs) from a single computer. It generates test cases for up to one million virtual users, simulating real-world user behavior, mobility patterns, and wireless conditions. Current versions support testing on 15 actual PDA models, with more in development. WTS' value proposition is that it can productize proven automated testing techniques to deliver high-fidelity, scalable testing of any wireless application on any device from a single system.
Invited Talk: C-SPIN, the Chicago Software Process Improvement Network. January 7, 2009, Schaumburg, Illinois. Overview of themes and concepts from ISSRE 2008.
Software Test Patterns: Successes and ChallengesBob Binder
This document discusses the successes and challenges of using test patterns over the past 10 years. It describes how test patterns were useful for articulating testing insights and practices, but have not been widely adopted. Reasons for limited adoption include the proliferation of templates, confusion between different pattern types, and the perception that using patterns requires too much additional modeling effort. The document also suggests that while innovators create new patterns, those seeking existing patterns may be less influential. It argues that test patterns will remain important for building a conceptual framework for testing and efficiently sharing solutions, especially as software systems increase in complexity.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalizationZilliz
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
Generative AI Deep Dive: Advancing from Proof of Concept to ProductionAggregage
Join Maher Hanafi, VP of Engineering at Betterworks, in this new session where he'll share a practical framework to transform Gen AI prototypes into impactful products! He'll delve into the complexities of data collection and management, model selection and optimization, and ensuring security, scalability, and responsible use.
Enchancing adoption of Open Source Libraries. A case study on Albumentations.AIVladimir Iglovikov, Ph.D.
Presented by Vladimir Iglovikov:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/iglovikov/
- https://x.com/viglovikov
- https://www.instagram.com/ternaus/
This presentation delves into the journey of Albumentations.ai, a highly successful open-source library for data augmentation.
Created out of a necessity for superior performance in Kaggle competitions, Albumentations has grown to become a widely used tool among data scientists and machine learning practitioners.
This case study covers various aspects, including:
People: The contributors and community that have supported Albumentations.
Metrics: The success indicators such as downloads, daily active users, GitHub stars, and financial contributions.
Challenges: The hurdles in monetizing open-source projects and measuring user engagement.
Development Practices: Best practices for creating, maintaining, and scaling open-source libraries, including code hygiene, CI/CD, and fast iteration.
Community Building: Strategies for making adoption easy, iterating quickly, and fostering a vibrant, engaged community.
Marketing: Both online and offline marketing tactics, focusing on real, impactful interactions and collaborations.
Mental Health: Maintaining balance and not feeling pressured by user demands.
Key insights include the importance of automation, making the adoption process seamless, and leveraging offline interactions for marketing. The presentation also emphasizes the need for continuous small improvements and building a friendly, inclusive community that contributes to the project's growth.
Vladimir Iglovikov brings his extensive experience as a Kaggle Grandmaster, ex-Staff ML Engineer at Lyft, sharing valuable lessons and practical advice for anyone looking to enhance the adoption of their open-source projects.
Explore more about Albumentations and join the community at:
GitHub: https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations
Website: https://albumentations.ai/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/100504475
Twitter: https://x.com/albumentations
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1DianaGray10
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
1. MDD and the
Tautology Problem:
Discussion Notes
MoDeVVA @ MODELS 2009
October 5, 2009
Robert V. Binder
2. The Tautology Effect
• Transformation of model into object code
is like transformation of source code into
object code
• An antecedent and its transformation
cannot provide additional information
necessary to reveal many common faults
• White-box testing has well know limitations
• Do these apply to implementations
produced with MDD?
3. White Box Testing Limitations
• Cannot test missing code – can’t reveal omissions
• Cannot completely infer requirements (intent) from code
• Where do we get the oracle? (how to discern
correct/incorrect outputs?)
• Triggering of side-effects
• Platform-specific behavior/interactions
• Blind to interaction effects outside the scope of the unit
under test
• Doesn’t scale
• Doesn’t support “non-functional” testing
• Possible developer bias in test selection
4. Weuyker: Adequacy Axioms
• In terms of the antecedent (source code), what must an
adequate test suite exercise?
• Must at least cover every statement
– What is a statement in a model?
• Anti-extensionality
– The semantic equality of two programs is not sufficient to imply
that they should necessarily be tested the same way
• Anti-decomposition
– Although a program has been adequately tested, it does not
necessarily imply that each of its called modules has been
adequately tested.
• More …
• Elaine J. Weyuker, “The Evaluation Of Program-based
Software Test Data Adequacy Criteria,” Communications
of the ACM, v 31 n 6, June 1988.
5. Manna: Limits of Verification
• Verification = proof of correctness
– We can never be sure that the specifications are
correct
– No verification system can verify every correct
program
– We can never be certain that a verification system is
correct
• Zohar Manna and Richard Waldinger, “The
Logic of Computer Programming,” IEEE
Transactions on Software Engineering, v SE-4, n
3, May 1978
6. Some Observations
• Transforming model elements to an executable
– Fewer constraints than code expression to machine
instructions
– Many assumptions baked-in with translator
– More fault opportunities
• Many functionally equivalent implementations
possible, suggests test strategy
– M to E1 with T1, M to E2 with T2
– Run same test suite on E1 and E2
– Expect identical results for deterministic behavior
– Expect bounded results for non-deterministic behavior