Make the Most of Your Time: How Should the Analyst Work with Automated Traceability Tools

•Download as PPT, PDF•

1 like•453 views

The document discusses requirements traceability and how analysts can work efficiently with automated traceability tools. It presents the results of two experimental studies that evaluated the impact of different analyst behaviors - including with/without feedback and global vs local ordering - on precision, recall, and effort when developing requirements traceability matrices. The most efficient behaviors were local ordering with feedback, as they resulted in the highest precision and recall while examining the fewest candidate links.

Make the Most of Your Time: How Should the Analyst Work with Automated Traceability Tools?* Alex Dekhtyar Jane Huffman Hayes Jody Larsen *Funded by NASA

Introduction ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What is Requirements Traceability? ,[object Object],[object Object]

Why is Traceability Important? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Design Document Information Retrieval and Traceability Representation Requirements Document Matching algorithm Analyst

What’s Different about Traceability? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

IR Based Traceability Frameworks ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

RETRO.NET ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Research Questions ,[object Object],[object Object]

Experimental Design ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Measures N - number of low-level requirements; M - number of high-level requirements; Hits - number of confirmed candidate links Strikes - number of false positives Misses - number of missed links Precision = Hits Hits + Strikes Recall = Hits Hits +Misses Selectivity = Hits + Strikes M * N

Global Ordering Without Feedback ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Local Ordering Without Feedback ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Global Ordering With Feedback ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Local Ordering With Feedback ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Dataset ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],36,556 Total # of retrieved candidate links 70.7% Selectivity 358 Total # of correct links retrieved by basic Vector Space 99% Recall 0.1% Precision # of elements in requirements (high-level) 235 # of elements in design specification (low-level) 220 # of correct links 361

Experimental Design Detail ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Random? ,[object Object],[object Object]

Random Methods ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Experiment Operation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Experiment Validity ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Study 1 Results, Fixed Recall Observed Links Precision Selectivity Local, Feedback 1595 20% 3% Local, No Feedback 1713 19% 3% Global, Feedback 5399 6% 10% Global, No Feedback 6149 5% 12%

Study 2 Results, Fixed Effort Confirmed Links Precision Recall Local, Feedback 321 20% 89% Local, No Feedback 326 20% 87.5% Global, Feedback 236 15% 65% Global, No Feedback 227 14% 63% Local, Random 65 4% 18% Global, Random 58 3.6% 16%

Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Future Work ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Search-Based Software Engineering is now a mature area with numerous techniques developed to tackle some of the most challenging software engineering problems, from requirements to design, testing, fault localisation, and automated program repair. SBSE techniques have shown promising results, giving us hope that one day it will be possible for the tedious and labour intensive parts of software development to be completely automated, or at least semi-automated. In this talk, I will focus on the problem of objective performance evaluation of SBSE techniques. To this end, I will introduce Instance Space Analysis (ISA), which is an approach to identify features of SBSE problems that explain why a particular instance is difficult for an SBSE technique. ISA can be used to examine the diversity and quality of the benchmark datasets used by most researchers, and analyse the strengths and weaknesses of existing SBSE techniques. The instance space is constructed to reveal areas of hard and easy problems, and enables the strengths and weaknesses of the different SBSE techniques to be identified. I will present on how ISA enabled us to identify the strengths and weaknesses of SBSE techniques in two areas: Search-Based Software Testing and Automated Program Repair. Finally, I will end my talk with future directions of the objective assessment of SBSE techniques.

Cukic Promise08 V3

gregoryg

Generation of Search Based Test Data on Acceptability Testing Principle

iosrjce

IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE) is a double blind peer reviewed International Journal that provides rapid publication (within a month) of articles in all areas of computer engineering and its applications. The journal welcomes publications of high quality papers on theoretical developments and practical applications in computer technology. Original research papers, state-of-the-art reviews, and high quality technical notes are invited for publications.

[Tho Quan] Fault Localization - Where is the root cause of a bug?

Ho Chi Minh City Software Testing Club

To debug, programmers must first be able to identify exactly where the bugs are, which is known as fault localization. Basically, this approach aims at prioritizing the program code based on its suspicious levels. Thus, it allows the code segments which are more likely to contain bug to be examined first. In this talk, we present the fundamental techniques of fault localization, which include model-based, proof-based and spectrum-based techniques. In addition, we also give a demonstration of a self-developed online education tool to help students locate the potential root causes of the programming errors occurring in their exercises.

A software fault localization technique based on program mutationsTao He

StratCel: A Strategy-Centric Approach to the Design of End-User Debugging Tools

hciresearch

The Tester’s Dashboard: Release Decision Support

Bob Binder

It Doesn't Do What You Think It Does

Justin Stoller

Real-world Strategies for Debugging Machine Learning Systems

Databricks

You used cross-validation, early stopping, grid search, monotonicity constraints, and regularization to train a generalizable, interpretable, and stable machine learning (ML) model. Its fit statistics look just fine on out-of-time test data, and better than the linear model it’s replacing. You selected your probability cutoff based on business goals and you even containerized your model to create a real-time scoring engine for your pals in information technology (IT). Time to deploy? Not so fast. Current best practices for ML model training and assessment can be insufficient for high-stakes, real-world systems. Much like other complex IT systems, ML models must be debugged for logical or run-time errors and security vulnerabilities. Recent, high-profile failures have made it clear that ML models must also be debugged for disparate impact and other types of discrimination. This presentation introduces model debugging, an emergent discipline focused on finding and fixing errors in the internal mechanisms and outputs of ML models. Model debugging attempts to test ML models like code (because they are code). It enhances trust in ML directly by increasing accuracy in new or holdout data, by decreasing or identifying hackable attack surfaces, or by decreasing discrimination. As a side-effect, model debugging should also increase the understanding and interpretability of model mechanisms and predictions.

The adoption of machine learning techniques for software defect prediction: A...

RAKESH RANA

Bugs as Deviant Behavior: A General Approach to Inferring Errors in Systems Code

Miro Cupak

Test design techniquesMohamed Elshenawy

AI-Driven Software Quality Assurance in the Age of DevOps

Chakkrit (Kla) Tantithamthavorn

With the rise of software systems ranging from personal assistance to the nation's facilities, software defects become more critical concerns as they can cost millions of dollar as well as impact human lives. Yet, at the breakneck pace of rapid software development settings (like DevOps paradigm), the Quality Assurance (QA) practices nowadays are still time-consuming. Continuous Analytics for Software Quality (i.e., defect prediction models) can help development teams prioritize their QA resources and chart better quality improvement plan to avoid pitfalls in the past that lead to future software defects. Due to the need of specialists to design and configure a large number of configurations (e.g., data quality, data preprocessing, classification techniques, interpretation techniques), a set of practical guidelines for developing accurate and interpretable defect models has not been well-developed. The ultimate goal of my research aims to (1) provide practical guidelines on how to develop accurate and interpretable defect models for non-specialists; (2) develop an intelligible defect model that offer suggestions how to improve both software quality and processes; and (3) integrate defect models into a real-world practice of rapid development cycles like CI/CD settings. My research project is expected to provide significant benefits including the reduction of software defects and operating costs, while accelerating development productivity for building software systems in many of Australia's critical domains such as Smart Cities and e-Health.

Towards a Better Understanding of the Impact of Experimental Components on De...

Chakkrit (Kla) Tantithamthavorn

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) teams play a critical role in the software development process to ensure the absence of software defects. It is not feasible to perform exhaustive SQA tasks (i.e., software testing and code review) on a large software product given the limited SQA resources that are available. Thus, the prioritization of SQA efforts is an essential step in all SQA efforts. Defect prediction models are used to prioritize risky software modules and understand the impact of software metrics on the defect-proneness of software modules. The predictions and insights that are derived from defect prediction models can help software teams allocate their limited SQA resources to the modules that are most likely to be defective and avoid common past pitfalls that are associated with the defective modules of the past. However, the predictions and insights that are derived from defect prediction models may be inaccurate and unreliable if practitioners do not control for the impact of experimental components (e.g., datasets, metrics, and classifiers) on defect prediction models, which could lead to erroneous decision-making in practice. In this thesis, we investigate the impact of experimental components on the performance and interpretation of defect prediction models. More specifically, we investigate the impact of the three often overlooked experimental components (i.e., issue report mislabelling, parameter optimization of classification techniques, and model validation techniques) have on defect prediction models. Through case studies of systems that span both proprietary and open-source domains, we demonstrate that (1) issue report mislabelling does not impact the precision of defect prediction models, suggesting that researchers can rely on the predictions of defect prediction models that were trained using noisy defect datasets; (2) automated parameter optimization for classification techniques substantially improve the performance and stability of defect prediction models, as well as they change their interpretation, suggesting that researchers should no longer shy from applying parameter optimization to their models; and (3) the out-of-sample bootstrap validation technique produces a good balance between bias and variance of performance estimates, suggesting that the single holdout and cross-validation families that are commonly-used nowadays should be avoided.

Software Analytics In Action: A Hands-on Tutorial on Mining, Analyzing, Model...

Chakkrit (Kla) Tantithamthavorn

Software analytics focuses on analyzing and modeling a rich source of software data using well-established data analytics techniques in order to glean actionable insights for improving development practices, productivity, and software quality. However, if care is not taken when analyzing and modeling software data, the predictions and insights that are derived from analytical models may be inaccurate and unreliable. The goal of this hands-on tutorial is to guide participants on how to (1) analyze software data using statistical techniques like correlation analysis, hypothesis testing, effect size analysis, and multiple comparisons, (2) develop accurate, reliable, and reproducible analytical models, (3) interpret the models to uncover relationships and insights, and (4) discuss pitfalls associated with analytical techniques including hands-on examples with real software data. R will be the primary programming language. Code samples will be available in a public GitHub repository. Participants will do exercises via either RStudio or Jupyter Notebook through Binder.

On Parameter Tuning in Search-Based Software Engineering: A Replicated Empiri...

Abdel Salam Sayyad

A Review on Parameter Estimation Techniques of Software Reliability Growth Mo...

Editor IJCATR

Software reliability is considered as a quantifiable metric, which is defined as the probability of a software to operate without failure for a specified period of time in a specific environment. Various software reliability growth models have been proposed to predict the reliability of a software. These models help vendors to predict the behaviour of the software before shipment. The reliability is predicted by estimating the parameters of the software reliability growth models. But the model parameters are generally in nonlinear relationships which creates many problems in finding the optimal parameters using traditional techniques like Maximum Likelihood and least Square Estimation. Various stochastic search algorithms have been introduced which have made the task of parameter estimation, more reliable and computationally easier. Parameter estimation of NHPP based reliability models, using MLE and using an evolutionary search algorithm called Particle Swarm Optimization, has been explored in the paper.

MSR End of Internship TalkRay Buse

Odin2018_Minh_ML_Risk_Prediction

Minh Nguyen

Automated parameter optimization should be included in future  defect predict...Chakkrit (Kla) Tantithamthavorn

Thesis Presentation

nirvdrum

SRECon-Europe-2017: Reducing MTTR and False Escalations: Event Correlation at...

Michael Kehoe

LinkedIn’s production stack is made up of over 900 applications, 2200 internal API’s and hundreds of databases. With any given application having many interconnected pieces, it is difficult to escalate to the right person in a timely manner. In order to combat this, LinkedIn built an Event Correlation Engine that monitors service health and maps dependencies between services to correctly escalate to the SRE’s who own the unhealthy service. We’ll discuss the approach we used in building a correlation engine and how it has been used at LinkedIn to reduce incident impact and provide better quality of life to LinkedIn’s oncall engineers.

What's hot

Instance Space Analysis for Search Based Software Engineering

Aldeida Aleti

Cukic Promise08 V3

gregoryg

Generation of Search Based Test Data on Acceptability Testing Principle

iosrjce

[Tho Quan] Fault Localization - Where is the root cause of a bug?

Ho Chi Minh City Software Testing Club

A software fault localization technique based on program mutationsTao He

StratCel: A Strategy-Centric Approach to the Design of End-User Debugging Tools

hciresearch

The Tester’s Dashboard: Release Decision Support

Bob Binder

It Doesn't Do What You Think It Does

Justin Stoller

Real-world Strategies for Debugging Machine Learning Systems

Databricks

The adoption of machine learning techniques for software defect prediction: A...

RAKESH RANA

Bugs as Deviant Behavior: A General Approach to Inferring Errors in Systems Code

Miro Cupak

Test design techniquesMohamed Elshenawy

AI-Driven Software Quality Assurance in the Age of DevOps

Chakkrit (Kla) Tantithamthavorn

Towards a Better Understanding of the Impact of Experimental Components on De...

Chakkrit (Kla) Tantithamthavorn

Software Analytics In Action: A Hands-on Tutorial on Mining, Analyzing, Model...

Chakkrit (Kla) Tantithamthavorn

On Parameter Tuning in Search-Based Software Engineering: A Replicated Empiri...

Abdel Salam Sayyad

A Review on Parameter Estimation Techniques of Software Reliability Growth Mo...

Editor IJCATR

MSR End of Internship TalkRay Buse

Odin2018_Minh_ML_Risk_Prediction

Minh Nguyen

Automated parameter optimization should be included in future  defect predict...Chakkrit (Kla) Tantithamthavorn

What's hot (20)

Instance Space Analysis for Search Based Software Engineering

Cukic Promise08 V3

Generation of Search Based Test Data on Acceptability Testing Principle

[Tho Quan] Fault Localization - Where is the root cause of a bug?

A software fault localization technique based on program mutations

StratCel: A Strategy-Centric Approach to the Design of End-User Debugging Tools

The Tester’s Dashboard: Release Decision Support

It Doesn't Do What You Think It Does

Real-world Strategies for Debugging Machine Learning Systems

The adoption of machine learning techniques for software defect prediction: A...

Bugs as Deviant Behavior: A General Approach to Inferring Errors in Systems Code

Test design techniques

AI-Driven Software Quality Assurance in the Age of DevOps

Towards a Better Understanding of the Impact of Experimental Components on De...

Software Analytics In Action: A Hands-on Tutorial on Mining, Analyzing, Model...

On Parameter Tuning in Search-Based Software Engineering: A Replicated Empiri...

A Review on Parameter Estimation Techniques of Software Reliability Growth Mo...

MSR End of Internship Talk

Odin2018_Minh_ML_Risk_Prediction

Automated parameter optimization should be included in future  defect predict...

Similar to Make the Most of Your Time: How Should the Analyst Work with Automated Traceability Tools

Thesis Presentation

nirvdrum

SRECon-Europe-2017: Reducing MTTR and False Escalations: Event Correlation at...

Michael Kehoe

How to improve your system monitoring

Andrew White

Search Quality Evaluation to Help Reproducibility : an Open Source Approach

Alessandro Benedetti

Every information retrieval practitioner ordinarily struggles with the task of evaluating how well a search engine is performing and to reproduce the performance achieved in a specific point in time. Improving the correctness and effectiveness of a search system requires a set of tools which help measuring the direction where the system is going. Additionally it is extremely important to track the evolution of the search system in time and to be able to reproduce and measure the same performance (through metrics of interest such as precison@k, recall, NDCG@k...). The talk will describe the Rated Ranking Evaluator from a researcher and software engineer perspective. RRE is an open source search quality evaluation tool, that can be used to produce a set of reports about the quality of a system, iteration after iteration and that could be integrated within a continuous integration infrastructure to monitor quality metrics after each release . Focus of the talk will be to raise public awareness of the topic of search quality evaluation and reproducibility describing how RRE could help the industry.

Search Quality Evaluation to Help Reproducibility: An Open-source Approach

Alessandro Benedetti

IRJET-Fake Product Review Monitoring

IRJET Journal

Multi-method Evaluation in Scientific Paper Recommender Systems

Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar

Optimising Clinical Trials Monitoring Data review - Neill Barron

Neill Barron

Thesis

Lashanda83

Data analysisNursing Path

Presentation in ACL Connections in Atlanta - April 2013mcoello

Quality key users

Antti Jakobsson

D017642026

IOSR Journals

Cser13.ppt

Ptidej Team

requirement analysis characteristics Helmy Faisal

-linkedinPragnya Balamurukesan

1440 track 2 boire_using our laptop

Rising Media, Inc.

Text Analytics for Legal work

AlgoAnalytics Financial Consultancy Pvt. Ltd.

Law firms & lawyers - rid the manual review of text documents, correspondence, etc. Text Analytics of unstructured documents signals potential knowledge that brings relevance & helps win cases. Moreover, use of text analytics helps offer small firms the same advantage that big firms have. As the information can be used to strengthen solutions and provide advice to attorneys, courtrooms will also benefit from more informed, better prepared legal teams and swift action, keeping long years of litigation away!

information technology materrailas paper

melkamutesfay1

AIRG Presentation

nirvdrum

Similar to Make the Most of Your Time: How Should the Analyst Work with Automated Traceability Tools (20)

Thesis Presentation

SRECon-Europe-2017: Reducing MTTR and False Escalations: Event Correlation at...

How to improve your system monitoring

Search Quality Evaluation to Help Reproducibility : an Open Source Approach

Search Quality Evaluation to Help Reproducibility: An Open-source Approach

IRJET-Fake Product Review Monitoring

Multi-method Evaluation in Scientific Paper Recommender Systems

Optimising Clinical Trials Monitoring Data review - Neill Barron

Thesis

Data analysis

Presentation in ACL Connections in Atlanta - April 2013

Quality key users

D017642026

Cser13.ppt

requirement analysis characteristics

-linkedin

1440 track 2 boire_using our laptop

Text Analytics for Legal work

information technology materrailas paper

AIRG Presentation

Recently uploaded

Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object Calisthenics

Dorra BARTAGUIZ

After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!

GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge Graph

Guy Korland

Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs. 1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302 2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/

Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...

UiPathCommunity

💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™: See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath. Speakers: 👨‍🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath 👩‍🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath

Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !

KatiaHIMEUR1

Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster. However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks. In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.

FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf

FIDO Alliance

UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4

DianaGray10

Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap. The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies. Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques What will you get from this session? 1. Insights into SAP testing best practices 2. Heatmap utilization for testing 3. Optimization of testing processes 4. Demo Topics covered: Execution from the test manager Orchestrator execution result Defect reporting SAP heatmap example with demo Speaker: Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP

FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: FIDO Security Aspects.pdf

FIDO Alliance

JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and Grafana

RTTS

Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application. In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics. Length: 30 minutes Session Overview ------------------------------------------- During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana: - What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests? - What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack? - Which features are provided by Grafana? - Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application To view the webinar recording, go to: https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar

State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 preview

Prayukth K V

The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development. The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers: State of global ICS asset and network exposure Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks Major cyber events in 2024 Malware and malicious payload trends Cyberattack types and targets Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs Attacks on counties – USA Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East Why are attacks on smart factories rising? Cyber risk predictions Axis of attacks – Europe Systemic attacks in the Middle East Download the full report from here: https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/

Monitoring Java Application Security with JDK Tools and JFR Events

Ana-Maria Mihalceanu

Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...

Product School

De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...

Product School

AI for Every Business: Unlocking Your Product's Universal Potential by VP of ...

Product School

Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with Parameters

Safe Software

Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place. Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects. Here’s what you’ll gain: - Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows. - Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy. - Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency. - Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity. We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic. Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.

FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: The WebAuthn API and Discoverable Credentials.pdf

FIDO Alliance

Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...

Product School

From Siloed Products to Connected Ecosystem: Building a Sustainable and Scala...

Product School

Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...

Jeffrey Haguewood

Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows. We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases. This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams. Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.

The Art of the Pitch: WordPress Relationships and Sales

Laura Byrne

Clients don’t know what they don’t know. What web solutions are right for them? How does WordPress come into the picture? How do you make sure you understand scope and timeline? What do you do if sometime changes? All these questions and more will be explored as we talk about matching clients’ needs with what your agency offers without pulling teeth or pulling your hair out. Practical tips, and strategies for successful relationship building that leads to closing the deal.

GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...

Sri Ambati

Recently uploaded (20)