The document summarizes regulations for preventing pollution from harmful substances carried by sea. It discusses the revised MARPOL Annex III regulations which were adopted in 2006 to harmonize with UN transportation standards. The regulations aim to safely package and identify marine pollutants. They prohibit jettisoning harmful substances except for ship safety and allow washing leakages overboard only if it does not impair safety. The regulations apply to all ships carrying such substances and require packaging, labeling, and documentation standards. Implementation was initially hampered by a lack of definition but amendments to the IMDG Code remedied this by identifying marine pollutants.
International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments (BWM)
Adoption: 13 February 2004; Entry into force: 8 September 2017
Ships must have a Ballast Water Record Book
The prevention of air pollution from ships-Marpol Annex VIYasser B. A. Farag
Annex VI of MARPOL convention for air pollution prevention from international shipping. The presentation includes an introductory information about:
Includes:
Regulation 12 - Emissions from Ozone depleting substances from refrigerating plants and fire fighting equipment
Regulation 13 - Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions from diesel engines
Regulation 14 - Sulphur Oxide (SOx) emissions from ships
Regulation 15 - Volatile Organic compounds
Regulation 16 - Emissions from shipboard incinerators
Regulation 18 - Fuel Oil quality.
Regulations 19 – Energy Efficiency on ships
MARPOL is an international convention adopted by IMO for the prevention of marine pollution. Marpol and its annexes are included in this ppt. Happy reading
MARPOL 73/78 –ANNEX 5
(including amendments)
Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships
Introduction
A plastic bottle dumped into the ocean takes 450 years to degrade, an aluminum can takes 200-500, and tin can 100, according to numbers cited by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the shiping industry.
Regulation 1
definnitions
For the purposes of this Annex
Garbage means all kinds of victual, domestic and operational waste excluding fresh fish and part thereof, generated during the normal operation of the ship and liable to be disposed of continuously or periodically except those substances which are defined or listed in other Annexes to the present convention
Food wastes are any spoiled or unspoiled victual substances, such as fruits, vegetables, dairy products, poultry, meat product, food scraps, food particles, and all other materials contaminated by such wastes, generated onboard ship, principally in the gallery and dining areas.
Nearest land The term "from the nearest land" means from the baseline from which the territorial sea of the territory in question is established in accordance with international law.
Nearest land The term "from the nearest land" means from the baseline from which the territorial sea of the territory in question is established in accordance with international law.
Regulation 2
application
The provision of this Annex shall apply to all ships.
Regulation 3
disposal of garbage out side special areas
1) Subject to the provisions of regulations 4, 5 and 6 of this Annex:
the disposal into the sea of all plastics, including but not limited to synthetic ropes, synthetic fishing nets, plastic garbage bags and incinerator ashes from plastic products which may contain toxic or heavy metal residues, is prohibited;
the disposal into the sea of the following garbage shall be made as far as practicable from the nearest land but in any case is prohibited if the distance from the nearest land is less than:
(i) 25 nautical miles for dunnage, lining and packing materials which will float;
(ii) 12 nautical miles for food wastes and all other garbage including paper
products, rags, glass, metal, bottles, crockery and similar refuse;
disposal into the sea of garbage specified in subparagraph(b)(ii) of this regulation may be permitted when it has passed through a comminuter or grinder and made as far as practicable from the nearest land but in any case is prohibited if the distance from the nearest land is less than 3 nautical miles. Such comminuted or ground garbage shall be capable of passing through a screen with openings no greater than 25 mm.
2) When the garbage is mixed with other discharges having different disposal or discharge requirements the more stringent requirements shall apply.
Regulation 4
special requirements for disposal of garbage
1) Subject to th
International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments (BWM)
Adoption: 13 February 2004; Entry into force: 8 September 2017
Ships must have a Ballast Water Record Book
The prevention of air pollution from ships-Marpol Annex VIYasser B. A. Farag
Annex VI of MARPOL convention for air pollution prevention from international shipping. The presentation includes an introductory information about:
Includes:
Regulation 12 - Emissions from Ozone depleting substances from refrigerating plants and fire fighting equipment
Regulation 13 - Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions from diesel engines
Regulation 14 - Sulphur Oxide (SOx) emissions from ships
Regulation 15 - Volatile Organic compounds
Regulation 16 - Emissions from shipboard incinerators
Regulation 18 - Fuel Oil quality.
Regulations 19 – Energy Efficiency on ships
MARPOL is an international convention adopted by IMO for the prevention of marine pollution. Marpol and its annexes are included in this ppt. Happy reading
MARPOL 73/78 –ANNEX 5
(including amendments)
Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships
Introduction
A plastic bottle dumped into the ocean takes 450 years to degrade, an aluminum can takes 200-500, and tin can 100, according to numbers cited by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the shiping industry.
Regulation 1
definnitions
For the purposes of this Annex
Garbage means all kinds of victual, domestic and operational waste excluding fresh fish and part thereof, generated during the normal operation of the ship and liable to be disposed of continuously or periodically except those substances which are defined or listed in other Annexes to the present convention
Food wastes are any spoiled or unspoiled victual substances, such as fruits, vegetables, dairy products, poultry, meat product, food scraps, food particles, and all other materials contaminated by such wastes, generated onboard ship, principally in the gallery and dining areas.
Nearest land The term "from the nearest land" means from the baseline from which the territorial sea of the territory in question is established in accordance with international law.
Nearest land The term "from the nearest land" means from the baseline from which the territorial sea of the territory in question is established in accordance with international law.
Regulation 2
application
The provision of this Annex shall apply to all ships.
Regulation 3
disposal of garbage out side special areas
1) Subject to the provisions of regulations 4, 5 and 6 of this Annex:
the disposal into the sea of all plastics, including but not limited to synthetic ropes, synthetic fishing nets, plastic garbage bags and incinerator ashes from plastic products which may contain toxic or heavy metal residues, is prohibited;
the disposal into the sea of the following garbage shall be made as far as practicable from the nearest land but in any case is prohibited if the distance from the nearest land is less than:
(i) 25 nautical miles for dunnage, lining and packing materials which will float;
(ii) 12 nautical miles for food wastes and all other garbage including paper
products, rags, glass, metal, bottles, crockery and similar refuse;
disposal into the sea of garbage specified in subparagraph(b)(ii) of this regulation may be permitted when it has passed through a comminuter or grinder and made as far as practicable from the nearest land but in any case is prohibited if the distance from the nearest land is less than 3 nautical miles. Such comminuted or ground garbage shall be capable of passing through a screen with openings no greater than 25 mm.
2) When the garbage is mixed with other discharges having different disposal or discharge requirements the more stringent requirements shall apply.
Regulation 4
special requirements for disposal of garbage
1) Subject to th
Globally we need to halve the carbon emissions by 2050. Through the release of Greenhouse Gases (GHG), the industry also contributes significantly to climate change.Several reulations has been put in place to help recude CO2 emissions but the shipping industry is still faced by some challenges. Big Data is helping to cut fuel bills and CO2 emissions. Objective is to build a ship rating tool for ranking and rating ships on their emissions.
Ship Propulsion Systems. Maximum Fuel Economy Through SimulationYann Rageul
Ship Propulsion and Auxiliary machinery optimisation through simulation tools. Capable of optimising marine propulsion architecture including hybrid system (energy storage, fuel cell, gas turbine, diesel engines, etc.) under different operating conditions (slow steaming, high hotel load, rapid response, etc.)
COLD IRONING Ships - Alternative Maritime PowerPawanexh Kohli
Maritime emission control, shore to ship electric power. Controlling air pollution from ocean going ships. Marine Air pollution due to furnace oil as fuel. Download from www.crosstree.info Power requirement of ships while docked in port. Alternative Maritime Power, global warming
See highlights of our 2014 Solutions Inspiring Action registrants. Top Solutions will be invited to present their ideas at our annual event on 5-7 October in Savannah, GA.
Andrea Marroni - Expert Leader - Climate Change, AF - Mercados EMI EuropeWEC Italia
Slides presentate a Roma il 21 novembre 2013 in occasione del Workshop "Il Ruolo della Marina Militare per l'Impiego del Gas Naturale nella Propulsione Navale" promosso da @ConferenzaGNL, un progetto a cura di Symposia e WEC Italia - TWITTER #GNL @ItalianNavy
Ricardo-AEA provided technical support to the European Commission in assessing the environmental, social and economic impacts of policy proposals to reduce GHG emissions from the international shipping sector.
Despite some recent progress in the IMO negotiations with respect to technical measures for new ships, the emissions of existing vessels are still not regulated. At the European level, a range of targets have been set concerning economy-wide GHG emission reductions. International shipping is the only sector not included in EU level GHG reduction targets. The modelling projections developed for this project show that under the baseline scenario CO2 emissions from European maritime transport would increase by over 50% between 2010 and 2050. As such, there is a pressing need to take action to control the growing GHG emissions from the international maritime sector.
#Carriage Ban for Fuels Non-compliant with IMO 2020 Comes into Force# By SN P...SN Panigrahi, PMP
#Carriage Ban for Fuels Non-compliant with IMO 2020 Comes into Force# By SN Panigrahi,
Essenpee Business Solutions,
About International Maritime Organization (IMO),
International Maritime Organization (IMO) Number,
Cleaner Air in 2020,
How can vessel operators comply with the IMO 2020 regulation?,
What Does IMO 2020 Go into Effect?,
What is the "carriage ban" and how does it work?,
What must ships do to meet the new IMO regulations?,
IMO is not Responsible for Enforcing their Policies,Regulatory Impact of IMO 2020,
Cost Impacts
Shipping industry ha sbeen experiencing a small boom in connection to the use of LNG as fuel. However more fuels come into play. What will be the future mix of all these fuels? Is it going to be one fuel dominating all others or we will have a more diverse picture?
This paper attempts to answer these questions.
2023-New technologies for greener Shipping-IMO's effort.pptxKuanzongFung
The shipping industry has been making significant contribution on releasing GHG emission. IMO has made great effort for shipping industry on reduction of GHG emission.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualityInflectra
In this insightful webinar, Inflectra explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming software development and testing. Discover how AI-powered tools are revolutionizing every stage of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), from design and prototyping to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
Learn about:
• The Future of Testing: How AI is shifting testing towards verification, analysis, and higher-level skills, while reducing repetitive tasks.
• Test Automation: How AI-powered test case generation, optimization, and self-healing tests are making testing more efficient and effective.
• Visual Testing: Explore the emerging capabilities of AI in visual testing and how it's set to revolutionize UI verification.
• Inflectra's AI Solutions: See demonstrations of Inflectra's cutting-edge AI tools like the ChatGPT plugin and Azure Open AI platform, designed to streamline your testing process.
Whether you're a developer, tester, or QA professional, this webinar will give you valuable insights into how AI is shaping the future of software delivery.
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Let's dive deeper into the world of ODC! Ricardo Alves (OutSystems) will join us to tell all about the new Data Fabric. After that, Sezen de Bruijn (OutSystems) will get into the details on how to best design a sturdy architecture within ODC.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and Grafana
Marpol annex 3& 6
1.
2. Prevention of Pollution by Harmful Substances
Carried by Sea in Packaged Form
Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Harmful Substances Carried by
Sea in Packaged Form are contained in Annex III of MARPOL 73/78.
The Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) at its 55th session in
October 2006 adopted the revised MARPOL Annex III Regulations for the
prevention of pollution by harmful substances carried by sea in packaged form.
The Annex has been revised to harmonize the regulations with the criteria for
defining marine pollutants which have been adopted by the UN Transport of
Dangerous Goods (TDG) Sub-Committee, based on the United Nations Globally
Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
3. The regulations were developed in order to identify marine pollutants so that they
could be packed and stowed on board ship in such a way as to minimise accidental
pollution as well as to aid recovery by using clear marks to distinguish them from
other (less harmful) cargoes.
The rules on discharging harmful goods are straightforward: "Jettisoning of harmful
substances carried in packaged form shall be prohibited, except where necessary
for the purpose of securing the safety of the ship or saving life at sea".
The Annex states that "appropriate measures based on the physical, chemical and
biological properties of harmful substances shall be taken to regulate the washing of
leakages overboard, provided that compliance with such measures would not impair
the safety of the ship and persons on board." (MARPOL Annex III, Regulation 7 (1))
The Annex applies to all ships carrying harmful substances in packaged form, or in
freight containers, portable tanks or road and rail tank wagons.
The regulations require the issuing of detailed standards on packaging, marking,
labelling, documentation, stowage, quantity limitations, exceptions and notifications,
for preventing or minimizing pollution by harmful substances.
4. However, implementation of the Annex was initially hampered by the lack of a clear
definition of harmful substances carried in packaged form. This was remedied by
amendments to the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code) to
include marine pollutants.
The IMDG Code was first adopted by IMO in 1965 and lists hundreds of specific
dangerous goods together with detailed advice on storage, packaging and
transportation. The amendments extending the Code to cover marine pollutants,
which entered into force in 1991, added the identifier "marine pollutant" to all
substances classed as such. All packages containing marine pollutants must be
marked with a standard marine pollutant mark.
Annex III of MARPOL was also amended at the same time, to make it clear that
"harmful substances are those substances which are identified as marine pollutants
in the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code)." (Regulation 1).
Annex III is optional so that States who sign up to MARPOL 73/78 Annexes I and II
are not required to adopt the Annex at the same time. Annex III received sufficient
ratifications by 1991 and entered into force on 1 July 1992.
5. A new chapter for MARPOL Annex VI – requirements for technical and operational
measures to improve the energy efficiency of international shipping
By Edmund Hughes, Technical Officer, Marine Environment Division, IMO
February 2013
New regulations aimed at improving the energy efficiency of international
shipping entered into force on 1 January 2013.
The amendments to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution
from Ships (MARPOL) were adopted in July 2011.They add a new chapter 4
Regulations on energy efficiency for ships to MARPOL Annex VI, to make
mandatory the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI), for new ships, and the
Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) for all ships. Other
amendments to Annex VI add new definitions and the requirements for survey
and certification, including the format for the International Energy Efficiency
Certificate.
The regulations apply to all ships of 400 gross tonnage and above. However,
under regulation 19, the Administration may waive the requirements for new
ships up to a maximum of 4 years.
6. The EEDI is a non-prescriptive, performance-based mechanism that leaves
the choice of technologies to use in a specific ship design to the industry. As
long as the required energy-efficiency level is attained (regulations 20 and 21),
ship designers and builders would be free to use the most cost-efficient
solutions for the ship to comply with the regulations.
The SEEMP establishes a mechanism for operators to improve the energy
efficiency of ships. Regulation 22 requires ships to keep on board a ship
specific Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP).
7. Enhancing energy efficiency
Shipping is permanently engaged in efforts to optimize fuel consumption. And,
while ships are universally recognized as the most fuel-efficient mode of bulk
cargo transportation, the Second IMO GHG Study, published in 2009,
identified a significant potential for further improvements in energy efficiency,
mainly through the use of already existing technologies such as more efficient
engines and propulsion systems, improved hull designs and larger ships: or, in
other words, through technical- and design-based measures that can achieve
noteworthy reductions in fuel consumption and resulting CO2 emissions on a
capacity basis
(tonne-mile). The study also concluded that additional reductions could be
obtained through operational measures such as lower speed, voyage
optimization, etc.
The EEDI addresses the former type of measure by requiring a minimum
energy efficiency level for new ships; by stimulating continued technical
development of all the components influencing the fuel efficiency of a ship; and
by separating the technical and design-based measures from the operational
and commercial ones.
The SEEMP provides a management framework, that may form part of the
ship’s safety management system, for improving the energy efficiency of a ship
whilst operating at sea and in port,.
8. Applicability
The EEDI formula – as presently drafted – is not supposed to be applicable to all new
ships of 400 gross tonnes and above engaged in international trade. Indeed, it is
explicitly recognized that it is not suitable for all ship types (particularly those not
designed to transport cargo) or for all types of propulsion systems (e.g., ships with
diesel-electric, turbine or hybrid propulsion systems will need additional correction
factors).
Indeed, the first iteration of the EEDI has been purposefully developed for the largest
and most energy-intensive segments of the world merchant fleet, thus embracing
approximately 70 per cent of emissions from new ships and covering the following
ship types: tankers, gas carriers, bulk carriers, general cargo ships, refrigerated cargo
carriers and container ships.
For ship types not covered by the current formula, suitable formulae will be
developed in due course to address the largest emitters first. IMO’s Marine
Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) is poised to consider the matter in detail
at future sessions, with a view to adopting further iterations of the EEDI.
9. All existing ships of 400 gross tonnes and above engaged in international trade are
required to implement and maintain a SEEMP which establishes a mechanism for
operators to improve the energy efficiency of ships. This should be achieved by
monitoring the energy efficiency performance of a ship’s transportation work and at
regular intervals considering new technologies and practices to improve energy
efficiency.
The SEEMP will offer operators of existing ships the chance to reduce costs
immediately by saving fuel. As the regulation does not set any energy efficiency
requirements it will be up to the industry to proactively utilize SEEMP to ensure they
optimize the fuel saving benefits. In the end it is in the industry’s best interests to
utilize the SEEMP as with fuel accounting for
over 50% of operational costs, keeping fuel costs in check is a major factor in the
industry’s economic health. Such an approach will be important to achieving both
sustainable development and economic goals for the industry going forward.
10. A set of such guidelines was adopted by MEPC 63 (March 2012) intended to
assist in the implementation of the mandatory regulations on Energy Efficiency for
Ships in MARPOL Annex VI:
resolution MEPC.212(93) – 2012 Guidelines on the method of calculation of the
attained Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for new ships;
resolution MEPC.213(93) – 2012 Guidelines for the development of a Ship
Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP);
resolution MEPC.214(93) – 2012 Guidelines on survey and certification of the
Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI); and
resolution MEPC.215(93) – Guidelines for calculation of reference lines for use
with the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI).
11. Minimum propulsion power
The need for a minimum propulsion power to be incorporated into the EEDI formula
has been duly acknowledged and, to that end, regulation 21.5 of MARPOL Annex VI
states that “For each ship to which this regulation applies, the installed propulsion
power shall not be less than the propulsion power needed to maintain the
manoeuvrability of the ship under adverse conditions as defined in the guidelines to
be developed by the Organization.”
It should, therefore, be clear that IMO fully supports the view that a minimum
installed power to maintain safe navigation in adverse (weather) conditions is of
critical importance to ensure both the safety and efficiency of international shipping.
While the EEDI instrument therefore contains the standard to be achieved on this
matter, implementation of that standard will be enabled through guidelines that are
also to be adopted. IMO circular MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.11 provides “Interim Guidelines
for determining minimum propulsion power to maintain the manoeuvrability of ships
in adverse conditions”.
12. Fuel efficiency and engine power
Although the easiest way to improve a vessel’s fuel efficiency is, indeed, to
reduce speed – hence the move to slow steaming by a significant number of
ships – there is a practical minimum at which fuel efficiency will decrease as a
vessel is slowed down further.
There are other technical ways to improve fuel efficiency, such as waste heat
generators, which do not impact on speed (they impact on auxiliary engines).
Indeed, improvements in road transport efficiency have been made through
advances in technology that have, however, not led to a sacrifice in speed;
rather, quite the opposite.
13. It has been (wrongly) argued that the EEDI limits installed power and so induces
owners to use small-bore high-rpm engines, thereby increasing fuel consumption.
However, a reduction of installed power does not require a reduction in engine bore
and increasing rpm. The easiest way to reduce power would be to “de-rate” the
exact same engine by limiting the “maximum” rpm (remember, horsepower = torque
multiplied by rpm).
This would have the impact of increasing propeller efficiency (if the exact same
propeller is installed), as propeller efficiency will generally improve as rpm
decreases. Another practical way to reduce installed horsepower is to install an
engine with one cylinder fewer.
This would have no impact on specific fuel consumption or rpm. Such engines can
be identified by reference to the catalogues of major engine manufacturers.
Of course, there are “economies of scale” in ships’ fuel efficiency.
The larger the ship (at a given speed), the lower the fuel consumption per unit of
cargo. However, such economies of scale are limited by trade considerations,
physical port limitations (generally, draft) or cargo logistics issues. Therefore, ships
tend to be designed to be as large as practical for a given trade.
14. Effectiveness of EEDI and SEEMP in
reducing emissions from ships
The EEDI, in establishing a minimum energy efficiency requirement for new ships
depending on ship type and size, provides a robust mechanism that may be used
to increase the energy efficiency of ships, stepwise, to keep pace with technical
developments for many decades to come. It is a non-prescriptive mechanism that
leaves the choice of which technologies to use in a ship design to the
stakeholders, as long as the required energy-efficiency level is attained, enabling
the most cost-efficient solutions to be used. Such technologies have been
comprehensively considered in the 2009 IMO GHG Study and are now frequently
highlighted by the shipping media.
A consequence of the new regulations, and the growing interest and demand for
innovative energy efficiency improving technologies, is leading to significant
investment in research and development. Fuel oil consumption represents a
significant element of the cost of operating a ship today.
15. The effective implementation of SEEMP onboard a ship could lead to a
reduction in fuel used, and so could be considered a commercial imperative, as
much as a regulatory one, for those seeking to manage a ship in today’s market.
To enable the ship’s energy efficiency performance is be optimised the
operational energy efficiency measures employed either at sea or in port need
to be robustly monitored and appropriate benchmarking tools used. Comparing
the energy efficiency performance of one ship with that of a similar ship on the
same trading route is also possible but this is more complicated as energy
efficiency of different ships can be affected by many variables, not least, the
weather and sea conditions they each experience.
A proactive approach to energy management of a ship should deliver
cost improvements for the business and a reduction of emissions from ships for
wider society.