This document outlines the criteria for evaluating a thesis, including originality and significance of the research topic, clarity of the theoretical background, appropriateness of the research methodology and statistical techniques, consistency in analyzing results, accuracy in discussing and interpreting results, clarity of language and style of presentation, quality of documentation and references, and consideration of ethical standards. The evaluation covers key elements like the research problem, objectives, questions, sample, data collection and analysis tools, results, discussion, and conclusions. The criteria aim to assess the overall quality, rigor, and contribution of the thesis.
Presentation for the HEA-funded workshop ‘Teaching Research Methods in Business and Management’.
Drawing on a mixture of practice and evidence, this one-day event provided an opportunity for those interested in the teaching of research methods in Business and Management – including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods – to share experiences, insights, and good practice, and to discuss challenges and explore potential solutions.
This presentation forms part of a blog post reporting on the event which can be accessed via: http://bit.ly/1fcTwna
For further details of HEA Social Sciences work relating to teaching research methods in the Social Sciences please see http://bit.ly/15go0mh
Presentation for the HEA-funded workshop ‘Teaching Research Methods in Business and Management’.
Drawing on a mixture of practice and evidence, this one-day event provided an opportunity for those interested in the teaching of research methods in Business and Management – including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods – to share experiences, insights, and good practice, and to discuss challenges and explore potential solutions.
This presentation forms part of a blog post reporting on the event which can be accessed via: http://bit.ly/1fcTwna
For further details of HEA Social Sciences work relating to teaching research methods in the Social Sciences please see http://bit.ly/15go0mh
Presentation for the HEA-funded workshop ‘Teaching Research Methods in Business and Management’.
Drawing on a mixture of practice and evidence, this one-day event provided an opportunity for those interested in the teaching of research methods in Business and Management – including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods – to share experiences, insights, and good practice, and to discuss challenges and explore potential solutions.
This presentation forms part of a blog post reporting on the event which can be accessed via: http://bit.ly/1fcTwna
For further details of HEA Social Sciences work relating to teaching research methods in the Social Sciences please see http://bit.ly/15go0mh
Presentation for the HEA-funded workshop ‘Teaching Research Methods in Business and Management’.
Drawing on a mixture of practice and evidence, this one-day event provided an opportunity for those interested in the teaching of research methods in Business and Management – including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods – to share experiences, insights, and good practice, and to discuss challenges and explore potential solutions.
This presentation forms part of a blog post reporting on the event which can be accessed via: http://bit.ly/1fcTwna
For further details of HEA Social Sciences work relating to teaching research methods in the Social Sciences please see http://bit.ly/15go0mh
Action research is the small intervention conducted by any practitioner. So each & every person must know the way of conducting action research. How to conduct action research that is described in this presentation.
How to write a "review of related literature"Husam BinSasi
This file gives insights to researchers about the main concepts of composing a literature review, which is the second chapter of an empirical or phenomenological study. This file used APA style as a guiding style to the organisation, process and conduct of Literature Reviews.
Best online evaluation system to enhance the development and delivery of tests. Our online assessment software is a best online employee evaluation system of the technical use for instructors, students, and administrators.
Action research is the small intervention conducted by any practitioner. So each & every person must know the way of conducting action research. How to conduct action research that is described in this presentation.
How to write a "review of related literature"Husam BinSasi
This file gives insights to researchers about the main concepts of composing a literature review, which is the second chapter of an empirical or phenomenological study. This file used APA style as a guiding style to the organisation, process and conduct of Literature Reviews.
Best online evaluation system to enhance the development and delivery of tests. Our online assessment software is a best online employee evaluation system of the technical use for instructors, students, and administrators.
“Critical appraisal is a systematic process used to identify the strengths and weakness of a research article in order to assess the usefulness and validity of research findings”
1. Thesis evaluation
By
Magdy M. Aly
Faculty of Education
Ain Shams University
Facebook : Magdy Aly
2. :Originality and significance
Title / new and not repeated •
Problem of research is a real one / it •
serves study
The problem is clearly stated •
The research is a contribution to the field •
The research has applications and •
implications
3. Clarity of theoretical background:
The t.b is written according to a clear line of thought/ personality
and the style of the research
No cut and paste
The T.b. is related and connected with the problem of the
research
Questions or hypotheses are formulated in light of the problem
and the t.b and related to the research objectives
Previous studies are relevant to the topic of the research.
The research has his own views concerning these previous
studies (analysis, appreciation, evaluation, comment) and the
)gaps (handicaps) in these studies which need to be bridged (met
4. :Method of the research
Objectives are related to the problem of the •
research
Questions are research questions that need •
procedures and tools in order to be answered
Sample is representative •
Experimental design is adequate •
Tools are reliable and valid •
Administration of tools, instructions and •
scoring are intact
6. :Consistency in analyzing results
Tables are readable, their results are •
related to questions or hypotheses of the
study
Analysis of data answered all the •
research questions
7. Accuracy in discussing and
: interpreting results
Discussion of the research results in •
comparison with results of other studies
Objectivity in deductions •
Recommendations are related to results •
and conclusions
8. :Clarity of language
:Clarity of language •
Readable •
Well constructed •
Not redundancy •
No misleading sentences or phrases •
9. :Style of presentation
Logical sequence of research items •
(Introduction- Theoretical background-
the problem- objectives- questions-
sample- tools –results – discussion –
conclusion – recommendations –
(references – appendices
Balance in presenting these parts •
Line of thought •