Lec 14 Authorship Issues
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•1,107 views
This document discusses authorship standards and issues in scientific publishing. It outlines why author order and attribution matter for communicating who did the research and granting proper credit. It describes problematic authorship situations like ghost writers and guest authors that can mislead readers. The document also summarizes International Committee of Medical Journal Editors standards for authorship and calls for more explicit identification of author contributions to increase accountability. It raises some concerns about peer review being misused to delay competitors' work.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Lecture overview: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Lec13 Scientific Papers and Communications
This document discusses scientific communication and the process of publishing scientific papers. It outlines the typical sections of a scientific paper, including the introduction, methods, results, and discussion. It also describes the role of peer review in evaluating papers before publication. While scientific papers aim to contribute to shared knowledge, they also serve as a way for scientists to establish priority and build their career records. This can complicate communication if it discourages sharing negative results or stretching the interpretation of findings. The document examines criticisms of the standard scientific paper format and considers other modes of scientific communication.
Authorship
The involvement of multiple individuals in different capacities naturally evokes the question of who should be credited and held accountable for the research published, especially since careers, ethics, and scientific integrity are at stake. This article outlines the major concepts pertaining to authorship.
Authorship (Part 1): Who should be the author of a research paper
Authorship (Part 1): Who should be the author of a research paperEditage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
Through the course of your research, right until you get your your paper published, there will be several individuals who have contributed to your research project in different ways. However, not all of these individuals can be considered as authors of your paper. So who qualifies as an author on your manuscript?
This slide deck will clarify who is an author, who does not qualify as an author of your paper and also three unethical authorship-related practices that you must avoid.Literature Review.pptx
The document provides information on conducting a literature review. It discusses that a literature review surveys relevant sources on a research topic and provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation. It notes the main purposes of a literature review include justifying research, identifying prior work and gaps, and placing one's own research in context. The document outlines the main types of literature reviews and discusses each. It provides guidance on identifying a research question, searching literature sources, managing references, critically analyzing sources, synthesizing information, and writing the literature review.
The Review of Related Literature
This is Unit IV for Methods of Research subject in Master of Arts in Management at ESSU Salcedo Campus, Salcedo, Eastern Samar
Peer Review
Peer review is the process by which scientific papers are evaluated by other experts in the field before being published. This document discusses peer review and its strengths and weaknesses. It explains that a scientist writes up their research and sends it to a journal editor, who then sends it to other scientists for review. The reviewers make recommendations to the editor on whether to reject, request changes, or accept the paper for publication. Peer review aims to ensure quality and validity, but it also faces criticisms such as potentially rejecting innovative ideas, relying on honesty, and slowing advances. The document prompts questions about peer review and provides additional resources on debates around the process.
Sources of Review Of Related Literature
Sources of review of related literature include journals, articles, abstracts, reviews, digests, books, and the internet. Journals and articles provide important sources for reviewing related literature. Abstracts, reviews, and digests provide a systematized list of references and summaries of content. A wide variety of books are available in the field of research. The internet is a fast-growing source of information in every field nowadays.
Authorship Issues
Slides from the lecture "Authorship issues" in Phil 133 ("Ethics in Science") at San Jose State University.
Recommended
Lec13 Scientific Papers and Communications
This document discusses scientific communication and the process of publishing scientific papers. It outlines the typical sections of a scientific paper, including the introduction, methods, results, and discussion. It also describes the role of peer review in evaluating papers before publication. While scientific papers aim to contribute to shared knowledge, they also serve as a way for scientists to establish priority and build their career records. This can complicate communication if it discourages sharing negative results or stretching the interpretation of findings. The document examines criticisms of the standard scientific paper format and considers other modes of scientific communication.
Authorship
The involvement of multiple individuals in different capacities naturally evokes the question of who should be credited and held accountable for the research published, especially since careers, ethics, and scientific integrity are at stake. This article outlines the major concepts pertaining to authorship.
Authorship (Part 1): Who should be the author of a research paper
Authorship (Part 1): Who should be the author of a research paperEditage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
Through the course of your research, right until you get your your paper published, there will be several individuals who have contributed to your research project in different ways. However, not all of these individuals can be considered as authors of your paper. So who qualifies as an author on your manuscript?
This slide deck will clarify who is an author, who does not qualify as an author of your paper and also three unethical authorship-related practices that you must avoid.Literature Review.pptx
The document provides information on conducting a literature review. It discusses that a literature review surveys relevant sources on a research topic and provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation. It notes the main purposes of a literature review include justifying research, identifying prior work and gaps, and placing one's own research in context. The document outlines the main types of literature reviews and discusses each. It provides guidance on identifying a research question, searching literature sources, managing references, critically analyzing sources, synthesizing information, and writing the literature review.
The Review of Related Literature
This is Unit IV for Methods of Research subject in Master of Arts in Management at ESSU Salcedo Campus, Salcedo, Eastern Samar
Peer Review
Peer review is the process by which scientific papers are evaluated by other experts in the field before being published. This document discusses peer review and its strengths and weaknesses. It explains that a scientist writes up their research and sends it to a journal editor, who then sends it to other scientists for review. The reviewers make recommendations to the editor on whether to reject, request changes, or accept the paper for publication. Peer review aims to ensure quality and validity, but it also faces criticisms such as potentially rejecting innovative ideas, relying on honesty, and slowing advances. The document prompts questions about peer review and provides additional resources on debates around the process.
Sources of Review Of Related Literature
Sources of review of related literature include journals, articles, abstracts, reviews, digests, books, and the internet. Journals and articles provide important sources for reviewing related literature. Abstracts, reviews, and digests provide a systematized list of references and summaries of content. A wide variety of books are available in the field of research. The internet is a fast-growing source of information in every field nowadays.
Authorship Issues
Slides from the lecture "Authorship issues" in Phil 133 ("Ethics in Science") at San Jose State University.
What Is Peer Review?
Peer Review is the Process used to judge the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer Reviewed articles are considered the best source to use when writing a research paper.
Evaluating Science Literature
The document outlines four steps for evaluating science literature:
1. Determine if the article reports original research with a hypothesis, methods, data, and discussion of results.
2. Check if the source is authoritative by looking for peer-review which ensures the science and conclusions are valid.
3. Assess if the research is objective by evaluating the hypothesis, methods, results reporting, and author credentials.
4. Determine if the research is valid by checking if the evidence supports the hypothesis, established methods were used, results can be reproduced, and interpretations are consistent.
Review of related literature
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review for a research paper or proposal. It discusses the key components and purposes of a literature review, including conceptualizing the problem, justifying the study variables and hypotheses, and differentiating the proposed approach. The document also covers locating relevant literature through electronic databases and print resources, analyzing and organizing the literature, and writing the literature review in a structured format with an introduction, body, summary, and bibliography. The overall goal of the literature review is to situate the research problem within existing scientific work and knowledge.
Lesson 13 synthesizing information from relavant literature
1. A synthesis draws on multiple sources to discuss a topic by inferring relationships between sources such as essays, articles, observations, and interviews.
2. There are two main types of synthesis - explanatory synthesis which objectively presents facts to help readers understand a topic, and argument synthesis which presents the author's viewpoint supported by facts from sources.
3. Sources that can be used in a synthesis include documents, numerical records, oral statements, and relics.
Plagiarism lesson
This document discusses plagiarism, including its definition, types, excuses for plagiarism, and consequences. It defines plagiarism as presenting others' words, ideas, or creative works as one's own without proper citation. There are two types: intentional plagiarism such as copying others' work verbatim, and unintentional plagiarism like poor paraphrasing. Consequences can include failing grades, suspension, or dismissal. The document provides tips for avoiding plagiarism such as quoting, paraphrasing, summarizing, and properly citing sources. It emphasizes giving credit to original authors to avoid being considered a plagiarist.
Ethics of Scientific publication
The essential mission of SRGE toward the research and education in Egypt is to foster learning and promoting research integrity in the current and next generation of researchers in Egypt. SRGE is rededicating itself to this fundamental purpose.
Literaturereviewinresearch 130507225729-phpapp01
The document discusses literature reviews, including their purpose and importance in the research process. It notes that a literature review describes what is already known about a topic based on primary sources, and helps identify gaps and inconsistencies in knowledge. The literature review establishes a theoretical base for a research study and determines the nature of the research. It can be used to identify relevant frameworks, refine research questions, and plan methodology. The document also discusses different sources for literature reviews, including electronic databases, books, journals, and other resources.
POL SOC 360 Process Problems Social Research
This document outlines the key steps in the scientific research process, including developing a research question, conducting a literature review, constructing a theory or hypothesis, gathering and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. It also discusses the differences between deductive and inductive approaches to research. Some challenges with social science research are noted, such as measuring human behavior and accounting for multiple meanings. Guidelines are provided for writing a literature review, including relating one's own work to previous studies and identifying gaps to address.
The pitfalls of “salami slicing” focus on quality and not quantity of publica...
The pitfalls of “salami slicing” focus on quality and not quantity of publica...Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
In the race to publish more papers, some researchers indulge in unethical practices, one of which is salami slicing. Salami slicing means fragmenting one study and publishing it in multiple papers. This practice is considered improper and can affect your career, besides being damaging to science. This SlideShare explains in detail what salami slicing is and why it is considered unethical. It also includes opinions of journal editors on the issue.3.rm the literature review
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as an evaluation and synthesis of previous research on a topic. The document outlines the main purposes of a literature review as conveying existing knowledge on a topic and identifying areas needing further research. It also discusses best practices for searching literature sources, organizing reviews thematically, and writing introductions, bodies, and conclusions for literature reviews. Key recommendations include being concise, selective, and focusing on evaluating evidence from sources.
Literature Reviews and APA style
This document provides guidance on writing literature reviews and APA style. It discusses synthesizing literature, writing literature reviews, and APA style tips. Key APA style elements include in-text citations, reference lists, capitalization rules, use of italics, hanging indents, and author name formatting. The document also provides examples of common in-text citation structures and reference list entries for different source types. It concludes with tips for ensuring citations and references are formatted correctly according to APA style.
How to Identify the Research Gap While Writing a PhD Dissertation Literature ...
PhD Assistance gives you tips to Identify Research Gaps in the Literature Review for writing a PhD dissertation.
A Research Gap is a Topic or field for which insufficient data restrict the ability to conclude a research question. If we are looking for a research issue, what is the healthiest beverage for humans? You can discover multiple studies and potential answers to the questions. Research gap identification eventually makes way for new and exciting research.
PhD Assistance offers UK Dissertation Research Topics Services. When you Order Dissertation Services at PhD Assistance, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, Always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Learn More:http://bit.ly/3aomOF3
Contact Us:
For Any Queries : Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/
UK NO: +44–1143520021
India No: +91–4448137070
WhatsApp No: +91 91769 66446
Email: info@phdassistance.com
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
The document discusses reviewing related literature and studies for research. It explains that the review contains conceptual literature from non-empirical sources as well as research literature from empirical studies. The review gives the researcher ideas for formulating a research problem and identifying previous related studies to build upon. It guides the researcher in developing a theoretical framework and research design. The review allows the researcher to analyze methods used in previous studies. Finally, the document lists common sources for related literature and provides instructions for writing the literature review introduction and reference list.
Lecture 32: Open Peer Review
This document discusses open peer review and its advantages over traditional peer review methods. Open peer review involves revealing the identities of both the author and reviewer. The document outlines some key benefits of open peer review such as increased transparency, the ability for broader community input and discussion, and new ways to evaluate impact and quality. While open peer review is still experimental, the document encourages publishers to experiment with different review models and engage researchers.
Review of related literature
Composed of discussions of facts and principles to which the present study is related
They may be classified as:
Local, if the inquiry was conducted in the Philippines; and
Foreign, if conducted in foreign lands RELATED STUDIES
Importance, Purposes, and Functions of Related Literature and Studies
A survey or review of related literature and studies is very important because such reviewed literature and studies serve as a foundation of the proposed study. This is because related literature and studies guide the researcher in pursuing his research venture. Importance, Purposes, and Functions of Related Literature and Studies
Theory and the review of related literature
Theory provides a systematic framework for understanding phenomena by specifying relationships between variables. The review of related literature identifies past relevant research and theories to situate a new study within the existing body of knowledge. It provides the conceptual framework and justification for a study by highlighting gaps. The review also identifies relevant constructs and questions for the new investigation based on past relationships found. It gives context on research methods, populations, and statistical analysis used in previous similar studies.
Locating & Reviewing Literature
This document discusses the process of locating and reviewing literature for research. It defines key terms like assessment, literature, and question. It also outlines the value of reviewing literature to glean ideas, study other research, and identify areas needing further study. The document describes different types of resources like general reference tools, primary sources, and secondary sources. It provides steps for conducting a literature review including defining the problem, searching databases, documenting sources, and evaluating primary sources. Finally, it discusses writing a literature review report and the benefits of computer searches for research.
Introduction to Peer review, updated 2015-03-05
Introduction to the peer review workshop for the PhD students of the Wageningen Graduate Schools. The goal is to explain peer review, entice PhD students to take part in the peer review process and give some tips on how to start with peer review.
Locating and reviewing the literature
This document provides an overview of the process of conducting a literature review. It discusses the value of reviewing previous related studies to learn what others have found and see the results of other work. The document outlines the key steps in a literature review including defining the research problem, searching general references and primary sources, taking notes, and considering random and non-random sampling techniques. Conducting a thorough literature review is important for master's and doctoral students when designing a thesis or dissertation.
How to get peer reviewed
Presentació realitzada per Remedios Melero en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).
Link v1.ethics in-research-and-publication-brochure
This document provides guidance on ethical issues related to authorship on scientific papers. It discusses the importance of properly attributing authorship to give appropriate credit and ensure accountability. Authorship generally requires a substantial intellectual contribution to the work. Misrepresenting authorship, such as omitting contributors or including "ghost", "guest", or "gift" authors who made little contribution, is considered misconduct. Disputes over authorship should be avoided by clearly defining expectations and roles from the start of a research project.
Scientific Papers and Communications
Slides from my lecture on scientific papers and communications in Phil 133 ("Ethics in Science") at San Jose State University.
More Related Content
What's hot
What Is Peer Review?
Peer Review is the Process used to judge the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer Reviewed articles are considered the best source to use when writing a research paper.
Evaluating Science Literature
The document outlines four steps for evaluating science literature:
1. Determine if the article reports original research with a hypothesis, methods, data, and discussion of results.
2. Check if the source is authoritative by looking for peer-review which ensures the science and conclusions are valid.
3. Assess if the research is objective by evaluating the hypothesis, methods, results reporting, and author credentials.
4. Determine if the research is valid by checking if the evidence supports the hypothesis, established methods were used, results can be reproduced, and interpretations are consistent.
Review of related literature
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review for a research paper or proposal. It discusses the key components and purposes of a literature review, including conceptualizing the problem, justifying the study variables and hypotheses, and differentiating the proposed approach. The document also covers locating relevant literature through electronic databases and print resources, analyzing and organizing the literature, and writing the literature review in a structured format with an introduction, body, summary, and bibliography. The overall goal of the literature review is to situate the research problem within existing scientific work and knowledge.
Lesson 13 synthesizing information from relavant literature
1. A synthesis draws on multiple sources to discuss a topic by inferring relationships between sources such as essays, articles, observations, and interviews.
2. There are two main types of synthesis - explanatory synthesis which objectively presents facts to help readers understand a topic, and argument synthesis which presents the author's viewpoint supported by facts from sources.
3. Sources that can be used in a synthesis include documents, numerical records, oral statements, and relics.
Plagiarism lesson
This document discusses plagiarism, including its definition, types, excuses for plagiarism, and consequences. It defines plagiarism as presenting others' words, ideas, or creative works as one's own without proper citation. There are two types: intentional plagiarism such as copying others' work verbatim, and unintentional plagiarism like poor paraphrasing. Consequences can include failing grades, suspension, or dismissal. The document provides tips for avoiding plagiarism such as quoting, paraphrasing, summarizing, and properly citing sources. It emphasizes giving credit to original authors to avoid being considered a plagiarist.
Ethics of Scientific publication
The essential mission of SRGE toward the research and education in Egypt is to foster learning and promoting research integrity in the current and next generation of researchers in Egypt. SRGE is rededicating itself to this fundamental purpose.
Literaturereviewinresearch 130507225729-phpapp01
The document discusses literature reviews, including their purpose and importance in the research process. It notes that a literature review describes what is already known about a topic based on primary sources, and helps identify gaps and inconsistencies in knowledge. The literature review establishes a theoretical base for a research study and determines the nature of the research. It can be used to identify relevant frameworks, refine research questions, and plan methodology. The document also discusses different sources for literature reviews, including electronic databases, books, journals, and other resources.
POL SOC 360 Process Problems Social Research
This document outlines the key steps in the scientific research process, including developing a research question, conducting a literature review, constructing a theory or hypothesis, gathering and analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. It also discusses the differences between deductive and inductive approaches to research. Some challenges with social science research are noted, such as measuring human behavior and accounting for multiple meanings. Guidelines are provided for writing a literature review, including relating one's own work to previous studies and identifying gaps to address.
The pitfalls of “salami slicing” focus on quality and not quantity of publica...
The pitfalls of “salami slicing” focus on quality and not quantity of publica...Editage Insights (Resources for authors and journals)
In the race to publish more papers, some researchers indulge in unethical practices, one of which is salami slicing. Salami slicing means fragmenting one study and publishing it in multiple papers. This practice is considered improper and can affect your career, besides being damaging to science. This SlideShare explains in detail what salami slicing is and why it is considered unethical. It also includes opinions of journal editors on the issue.3.rm the literature review
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as an evaluation and synthesis of previous research on a topic. The document outlines the main purposes of a literature review as conveying existing knowledge on a topic and identifying areas needing further research. It also discusses best practices for searching literature sources, organizing reviews thematically, and writing introductions, bodies, and conclusions for literature reviews. Key recommendations include being concise, selective, and focusing on evaluating evidence from sources.
Literature Reviews and APA style
This document provides guidance on writing literature reviews and APA style. It discusses synthesizing literature, writing literature reviews, and APA style tips. Key APA style elements include in-text citations, reference lists, capitalization rules, use of italics, hanging indents, and author name formatting. The document also provides examples of common in-text citation structures and reference list entries for different source types. It concludes with tips for ensuring citations and references are formatted correctly according to APA style.
How to Identify the Research Gap While Writing a PhD Dissertation Literature ...
PhD Assistance gives you tips to Identify Research Gaps in the Literature Review for writing a PhD dissertation.
A Research Gap is a Topic or field for which insufficient data restrict the ability to conclude a research question. If we are looking for a research issue, what is the healthiest beverage for humans? You can discover multiple studies and potential answers to the questions. Research gap identification eventually makes way for new and exciting research.
PhD Assistance offers UK Dissertation Research Topics Services. When you Order Dissertation Services at PhD Assistance, we promise you the following – Plagiarism free, Always on Time, outstanding customer support, written to Standard, Unlimited Revisions support and High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Learn More:http://bit.ly/3aomOF3
Contact Us:
For Any Queries : Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/
UK NO: +44–1143520021
India No: +91–4448137070
WhatsApp No: +91 91769 66446
Email: info@phdassistance.com
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
The document discusses reviewing related literature and studies for research. It explains that the review contains conceptual literature from non-empirical sources as well as research literature from empirical studies. The review gives the researcher ideas for formulating a research problem and identifying previous related studies to build upon. It guides the researcher in developing a theoretical framework and research design. The review allows the researcher to analyze methods used in previous studies. Finally, the document lists common sources for related literature and provides instructions for writing the literature review introduction and reference list.
Lecture 32: Open Peer Review
This document discusses open peer review and its advantages over traditional peer review methods. Open peer review involves revealing the identities of both the author and reviewer. The document outlines some key benefits of open peer review such as increased transparency, the ability for broader community input and discussion, and new ways to evaluate impact and quality. While open peer review is still experimental, the document encourages publishers to experiment with different review models and engage researchers.
Review of related literature
Composed of discussions of facts and principles to which the present study is related
They may be classified as:
Local, if the inquiry was conducted in the Philippines; and
Foreign, if conducted in foreign lands RELATED STUDIES
Importance, Purposes, and Functions of Related Literature and Studies
A survey or review of related literature and studies is very important because such reviewed literature and studies serve as a foundation of the proposed study. This is because related literature and studies guide the researcher in pursuing his research venture. Importance, Purposes, and Functions of Related Literature and Studies
Theory and the review of related literature
Theory provides a systematic framework for understanding phenomena by specifying relationships between variables. The review of related literature identifies past relevant research and theories to situate a new study within the existing body of knowledge. It provides the conceptual framework and justification for a study by highlighting gaps. The review also identifies relevant constructs and questions for the new investigation based on past relationships found. It gives context on research methods, populations, and statistical analysis used in previous similar studies.
Locating & Reviewing Literature
This document discusses the process of locating and reviewing literature for research. It defines key terms like assessment, literature, and question. It also outlines the value of reviewing literature to glean ideas, study other research, and identify areas needing further study. The document describes different types of resources like general reference tools, primary sources, and secondary sources. It provides steps for conducting a literature review including defining the problem, searching databases, documenting sources, and evaluating primary sources. Finally, it discusses writing a literature review report and the benefits of computer searches for research.
Introduction to Peer review, updated 2015-03-05
Introduction to the peer review workshop for the PhD students of the Wageningen Graduate Schools. The goal is to explain peer review, entice PhD students to take part in the peer review process and give some tips on how to start with peer review.
Locating and reviewing the literature
This document provides an overview of the process of conducting a literature review. It discusses the value of reviewing previous related studies to learn what others have found and see the results of other work. The document outlines the key steps in a literature review including defining the research problem, searching general references and primary sources, taking notes, and considering random and non-random sampling techniques. Conducting a thorough literature review is important for master's and doctoral students when designing a thesis or dissertation.
How to get peer reviewed
Presentació realitzada per Remedios Melero en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).
What's hot (20)
Lesson 13 synthesizing information from relavant literature
Lesson 13 synthesizing information from relavant literature
The pitfalls of “salami slicing” focus on quality and not quantity of publica...
The pitfalls of “salami slicing” focus on quality and not quantity of publica...
How to Identify the Research Gap While Writing a PhD Dissertation Literature ...
How to Identify the Research Gap While Writing a PhD Dissertation Literature ...
Similar to Lec 14 Authorship Issues
Link v1.ethics in-research-and-publication-brochure
This document provides guidance on ethical issues related to authorship on scientific papers. It discusses the importance of properly attributing authorship to give appropriate credit and ensure accountability. Authorship generally requires a substantial intellectual contribution to the work. Misrepresenting authorship, such as omitting contributors or including "ghost", "guest", or "gift" authors who made little contribution, is considered misconduct. Disputes over authorship should be avoided by clearly defining expectations and roles from the start of a research project.
Scientific Papers and Communications
Slides from my lecture on scientific papers and communications in Phil 133 ("Ethics in Science") at San Jose State University.
Apa manual presentation
This document provides an overview of writing for behavioral and social science publications. It discusses the main types of research articles, including empirical studies, literature reviews, theoretical articles, methodological articles, and case studies. It also outlines important ethical standards for publication, such as ensuring accurate reporting of results, protecting research participants, managing conflicts of interest, determining authorship, and maintaining intellectual property rights. Guidelines are provided for retaining data, avoiding plagiarism, and obtaining proper permissions and approvals. The document concludes with a checklist for authors to ensure compliance with ethical standards.
APA manual PPT Chapter - 1
This document summarizes key chapters from the 6th edition of the APA Manual. It discusses several types of research articles, including empirical studies, literature reviews, theoretical articles, methodological articles, and case studies. It also outlines important ethical standards for publishing, such as ensuring accurate reporting of results, protecting research participants, avoiding plagiarism and duplicate publication, and disclosing conflicts of interest. The document emphasizes the importance of ethical research practices and compliance with standards for maintaining integrity in scientific publishing.
Authorship
This document discusses authorship in scientific research publications. Authorship is important for several reasons, including scientists' responsibility to publish findings, peer review ensuring published work is valid, and authorship being necessary for career advancement. As research has become more collaborative, authorship criteria are needed to determine who deserves credit. To be an author, one should make a significant intellectual contribution and be prepared to defend the work. The document outlines appropriate and unethical authorship practices, and emphasizes the importance of accountability in authorship to avoid misconduct.
ethics.pdf
The document discusses various ethical issues that researchers may face, including where students learn ethical decision making, definitions of plagiarism and responsible authorship, detecting plagiarism in papers, examples of scientific misconduct, and the responsibilities of authors and journals in maintaining integrity in scientific publishing. It provides guidance on ethical research practices for avoiding misconduct like fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism.
publication.pptx
This document provides an overview of how to write and publish a scientific paper. It discusses the different types of scientific articles, the standard structure of papers, and how to write key sections like the introduction, methods, and discussion. It also covers the publishing process, including finding appropriate journals, formatting manuscripts, the peer review process, authorship guidelines, and ethics in scientific publishing. The document is intended as a guide for researchers on effectively communicating their work through scientific writing and publication.
As a system for advancing knowledge, science requires that investi.docx
As a system for advancing knowledge, science requires that investigators share their findings with the rest of the scientific community. Only if one’s findings are made public can knowledge accumulate as researchers build on, extend, and refine one another’s work. As we discussed in Chapter 1, a defining characteristic of science is that, over the long haul, it is self-correcting; and self-correction can occur only if research findings are widely disseminated. To this end, informing others of the outcome of one’s work is a critical part of the research process.
In this chapter we will examine how researchers distribute their work to other scientists, students, and the general public. Because the effective communication of one’s research nearly always involves writing, much of this chapter will be devoted to scientific writing. We will discuss criteria for good scientific writing and help you improve your own writing skills. We will also examine the guidelines that behavioral researchers use to prepare their research reports, a system of rules known as APA style. To begin, however, we’ll take a look at the three main routes by which behavioral scientists disseminate their research to others.
HOW SCIENTIFIC FINDINGS ARE DISSEMINATED
Researchers disseminate the results of their investigations among themselves in three ways: journal publications, presentations at professional meetings, and personal contact.
Journal Publication
Journal publication is the primary route by which research findings are disseminated to the scientific community. Scientific journals serve not only as a means of communication among researchers (most researchers subscribe to one or more journals in their fields) but also as the basis for the permanent storage of research findings in library collections. Traditionally, journals were published only in printed form, but today many journals are published in digital format as PDF files and on the Internet.
Before most journals will publish a research paper, it must undergo the process of peer review. In peer review, a paper is evaluated by other scientists who have expertise in the topic under investigation. Although various journals use slightly different systems of peer review, the general process is as follows.
1. The author submits copies of his or her paper to the editor of a relevant journal. (The editor’s name and address typically appear on the inside front cover of the journal and on the journal’s Web site.) Although a few journals still ask authors to submit paper copies of their manuscripts, most journals have on-line systems by which authors submit their work by sending word processing files. Authors are permitted to submit a particular piece of work to only one journal at a time.
2. The editor (or an associate editor designated by the editor) then sends a copy of the paper to two or more peer reviewers who are known to be experts in the area of research covered in the paper.
...
Writ 340 natural sciences dr. muniz
This document provides an overview for a research project assignment in Dr. Muniz's WRIT 340: Natural Sciences course. The assignment involves writing a research review analyzing multiple documents on a scientific topic.
Students will first submit a proposal on their topic and selected sources for peer review. They will then write a 2000-2500 word research review analyzing the current state of knowledge on their topic based on at least 6 sources, including an article from a general news source or science magazine, an article from a specialist website or blog, and an article from a peer-reviewed science journal. The review should include an abstract, introduction, summary of major changes in theory and research, description of important research, and conclusion. A change memo reflecting
Contributorship credit 23_august2019
The document discusses problems with traditional authorship practices in scientific publishing and proposes contributorship as an alternative. Traditional authorship obscures individual contributions, allows honorary authorships, and does not support growing specialization in science. Contributorship would provide a formal record of specific contributions using a standardized taxonomy and address issues of fairness, accountability, and efficient allocation of resources.
Authorship dispute, Medical journalism, and Research ethics
The document discusses medical journalism and research ethics, specifically around authorship issues. It provides examples of authorship disputes that have occurred, such as authors being omitted or added without permission. Guidelines are discussed for determining authorship, including the need for substantial contributions to the work. Methods for handling disputes are outlined, such as discussing authorship early and keeping records. Blowing the whistle is suggested if misconduct occurs rather than names being omitted or added in violation of guidelines.
Publication Ethics
This document discusses publication ethics and best practices for publishing research. It outlines what constitutes a good journal for publication, including being peer-reviewed and indexed in databases. It also warns about fake journal metrics and bogus journals. The document covers responsibilities of authors such as originality, transparency and retracting work if needed. Various forms of research misconduct like falsification, fabrication and plagiarism are described. Finally, the roles and responsibilities of editors, journal owners, publishers and reviewers are mentioned.
Ethics & Review of the Literature in Research .
This document discusses the review of literature for a research project. It begins by outlining basic ethical principles and considerations for research involving children. It then discusses the importance of conducting a literature review to learn what previous research has found and identify gaps. The document outlines the types of sources that can be reviewed, including primary and secondary sources. It provides steps for conducting a literature search, including defining the problem, searching references and databases, and obtaining relevant sources. Finally, it discusses writing the literature review report, which summarizes and synthesizes the findings from the reviewed sources.
Presentation to ethics workshop-104137 (1).ppt
This document discusses various publication ethics issues including authorship disputes, redundant or duplicate publication, competing manuscripts, and conflicts of interest. It provides statistics on the most common publication ethics cases handled by COPE and guidelines on determining authorship from organizations like ICMJE. It also outlines acceptable and unacceptable instances of overlapping publications, such as acceptable secondary publication with approval from both journals versus redundant publication which is unethical. The prevention of issues and responsibilities of editors and reviewers are also covered.
Intro to research
This document discusses different types of research including prognostic, directive, illuminative, exploratory, descriptive, experimental, analytical, holistic, action, evaluation, and historical research. It also discusses key aspects of research ethics including protecting human participants, serving societal interests, and examining projects' ethical soundness. Specific principles of research ethics mentioned are discussing intellectual property, being conscious of multiple roles, following informed consent rules, respecting confidentiality and privacy, and utilizing ethics resources. Issues of authorship, plagiarism, peer review, and conflicts of interest in research are also summarized.
Publication ethics
Ethics in medical sciences research may not always translate into ethical publications.
Ethical violations in conducting medical research always promote unethical scientific publications.
Published research influences other researchers and establishes credibility for individual or journal.
محاضرة (أخلاقيات البحث العلمي) د.فضيلة العنزي
This document summarizes a presentation on research ethics and scientific publication. It discusses author responsibilities including submitting original work and obtaining proper permissions. It defines plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other ethical violations. It provides examples of plagiarized papers that were retracted from journals. It discusses how journals detect problems, handle ethical violations, and work to uphold integrity. It emphasizes sharing knowledge through peer-reviewed publication and the importance of ethical conduct in research.
The Ethics of Scientific Paper Writing
The document discusses the ethical issues of plagiarism and authorship that authors should avoid in scientific writing. It defines different types of plagiarism like intentional plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and duplicate publication that violate ethical guidelines. The document also explains various forms of authorship abuse like coercion authorship, honorary authorship, and ghost authorship that authors should avoid to maintain integrity in their research publications.
Literature Review © 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. .docx
Literature Review
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc.
1
Literature Review
Program Transcript
[MUSIC PLAYING]
NARRATOR: Have you ever thought about a literature review as representing
your intellectual heritage or intellectual genealogy? In his exploration of the
purpose of a literature review, Dr. Patton explains this interesting perspective. He
also points out common errors to avoid when undertaking a literature review.
MICHAEL QUINN PATTON: One of the things that we do as scholar practitioners
is look at the knowledge created by other people. And we draw on that
knowledge as a way of positioning our own work and understanding where our
contribution to knowledge, our own research, fits in that larger tradition. This is
often referred to as the literature review. And the way that you go about knowing
the knowledge that others have generated, that you're going to build on and
contribute to, is to conduct a literature review.
I tend not to like that terminology, because it sounds like the purpose is to review
the literature. Literature review is actually a means to another end. And it's that
end, it's that purpose of conducting the literature review that I want to focus on.
The purpose is for you to understand your intellectual heritage, your intellectual
genealogy. Anytime we undertake an inquiry into a particular issue, we are
building on the knowledge of others. And we need to know what that knowledge
is. It's part of our obligation as scholars, is to understand what work has come
before us, what concepts we've inherited, what methods we've inherited, what
measures we've inherited. Some of which we've adopted, some of which we've
parted from. But we need to know that.
Because at the end of a program of study, a master's degree, a program of
doctoral inquiry, you're going to be expected to be able to locate your work within
that tradition. And so it means that you need to be able to establish the people
who formulated the basic distinctions that you're drawing on.
Let me share with you some of the mistakes that I, from my point of view, find
students engaging in when they undertake the literature review. One of these is
to simply do an internet search to see how many articles they can find on a topic.
Where they think that the game is how many citations you can come up with to
show that you've done the literature review.
This isn't a quantitative game. It's not something where the number of sources is
important. It's the quality of those sources and your engagement with them, that
you are able to engage with what other people have done and understand what's
relevant, what's not relevant to your own area of inquiry. So that you're
positioning yourself out of those traditions that others have engaged in.
Literature Review
© 2017 Laureate Education, Inc.
2
A second error is to think that the game is to position your work as unique. It is to
try to find something that nobod ...
Article writing mid
The document contains questions and answers related to writing an academic article for publication. It discusses key elements like including an abstract that summarizes the paper, identifying a corresponding author, addressing negative results, outlining the introduction, defining a literature review, distinguishing between primary and secondary sources when citing, including direct citations with author, year and page, and maintaining confidentiality of research respondents. The answers provide guidance on the proper structure and content of an academic research article and adhering to publication guidelines.
Similar to Lec 14 Authorship Issues (20)
Link v1.ethics in-research-and-publication-brochure
Link v1.ethics in-research-and-publication-brochure
As a system for advancing knowledge, science requires that investi.docx
As a system for advancing knowledge, science requires that investi.docx
Authorship dispute, Medical journalism, and Research ethics
Authorship dispute, Medical journalism, and Research ethics
Literature Review © 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. .docx
Literature Review © 2017 Laureate Education, Inc. .docx
More from Janet Stemwedel
Climategate and scientific methodology
The document discusses the 2009 hacking of emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia which led to public questions about the reliability and honesty of climate scientists. It summarizes concerns raised about the scientists' expressed reluctance to share data and code as requested, as well as references to a "trick" used to "hide the decline". However, it also notes that nothing in the emails provides evidence of a conspiracy or data falsification. The document examines issues around scientific transparency, biases, and building public trust in science.
P160 Kuhn and his Critics
This document summarizes Thomas Kuhn's view of scientific progress and theory change, and responses to Kuhn from philosophers Lakatos, Laudan, and Feyerabend. Kuhn argued that science progresses through "paradigm shifts" rather than continuous progress, observations are theory-laden, and the choice between paradigms is not fully objective. Later philosophers criticized aspects of Kuhn's view and proposed alternative models of scientific progress and rational theory evaluation.
P160 Duhem and Quine
This document discusses the philosophical ideas of Duhem, Quine, and challenges in theory testing and scientific methodology. It addresses the concepts of underdetermination of theory by data, holism in testing, and meaning holism. It explains that scientific theories are tested as groups, not in isolation, and that changing one hypothesis can require changes throughout the theoretical framework. The document uses examples like Newton's laws of motion and predictions of planetary orbits to illustrate these concepts.
P160 Hempel, Hume, Deduction, and Induction
The document discusses Semmelweis' work in the 1840s to address childbed fever in Vienna hospitals. Semmelweis observed that the mortality rate from childbed fever was much higher in the first division ward staffed by doctors and medical students compared to the second division ward staffed by midwives. Through a process of elimination, Semmelweis hypothesized that cadaveric particles carried from autopsies to patients caused the disease. Reducing these particles by washing hands and instruments with chlorinated lime lowered the mortality rate, supporting his hypothesis. However, his conclusion could not be logically proven through the evidence, as other factors could also explain the outcome. The document also discusses the problem of induction in drawing conclusions about
Lect10 Human Subjects: History
The document discusses the history of human subjects research, including unethical experiments conducted by Nazi Germany scientists and the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service from 1932 to 1972. The Nazi experiments violated subjects' rights and caused extreme harm. The Tuskegee study intended to observe untreated syphilis in black men but became unscientific when subjects received some treatment and contributed no useful medical knowledge. It was later deemed unethical by modern standards for failing to obtain informed consent and exposing subjects to harm without benefit.
Lect11 Human Subjects: Regulations
The document discusses the historical evolution of ethics guidelines for research involving human subjects. It begins with the Hippocratic Oath from ancient Greece which established early standards of medical ethics. It then discusses the Nuremberg Code created after World War II which focused on informed consent and avoiding harming subjects. Finally, it examines the Declaration of Helsinki which recognized the need for institutional review and emphasized informed consent, assessing risks/benefits, and protecting subject well-being.
Lec12 Human Subjects:Global Issues
This document discusses several ethical issues regarding human subjects research, particularly in developing countries. It summarizes the Belmont Report's principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. It then examines debates around the ethics of placebo-controlled trials in developing world contexts and whether local standards of care are acceptable for control groups. The tension between beneficence toward subjects and producing scientifically valid results that could benefit the population is also discussed.
Lec15 Patents and Intellectual Property
This document discusses several issues relating to patents and intellectual property:
- There is a tension between the norm of open scientific knowledge and the concept of intellectual property ownership.
- Employers and universities often claim ownership over intellectual property created by employees and students. Patent law varies by jurisdiction on this issue.
- Patents provide a limited monopoly on inventions in exchange for publicly disclosing details that allow others to replicate the work once the patent expires. However, critics argue the patent system does not always encourage innovation or serve the public interest.
Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue
International strategies for scientific dialogue discusses various cultural influences on scientific communities and how scientists navigate these differences. Some key points summarized:
1. Local cultures and institutions can influence how science is practiced differently than an idealized meritocratic model. Hierarchies form within communities based on factors like field of study or country of origin.
2. Japanese scientists aim to participate globally while maintaining their national identity, but risk being seen as "strange" if habits from abroad are acknowledged.
3. The Tsukuba Science City project departed from traditional Japanese models by focusing on a less prestigious field outside standard university channels. This lowered their status nationally but raised it internationally in that field.
Explanation classroomversion
The document discusses different types of scientific explanations and criteria for a good explanation. It presents the deductive-nomological model of explanation but notes some limitations, as not all good explanations fit this model and some arguments that fit the model may not be good explanations. Different examples are provided to illustrate explanations based on laws of nature, statistical generalizations, mechanisms, and pragmatic or contextual factors.
P160 antirealismclassroomversion
The document discusses various positions regarding scientific realism and antirealism. It presents an example from the 19th century of a scientist, Jones, developing a theory that an unobservable microbe called a "crobe" is responsible for transmitting disease in the same way that lice transmit diseases. While the theory is empirically successful, some argue we cannot know if crobes truly exist. The document explores arguments for scientific realism, antirealism, and a middle position of "entity realism," discussing what types of claims we can and cannot make regarding observable versus unobservable entities based on empirical evidence and scientific theories.
P160 naturalismclassroomlect
The document discusses several topics relating to naturalism as a philosophical approach:
1) Naturalism shifts the question from how to justify scientific methodology to how to adequately describe how knowledge and science work based on what science tells us.
2) A naturalist view is that science can describe the belief-forming mechanisms that humans use and philosophy can evaluate how good those mechanisms are for achieving different goals.
3) Several philosophers discussed apply scientific findings and methods to philosophical problems, including describing how social and reward structures within science help explain its success.
Feminist Critiques of Science
The document discusses feminist critiques of science, specifically examining how the exclusion of women from science may have been harmful. It explores how scientific theories in the past have promoted gender biases and stereotypes to justify excluding women. A key feminist critique is that excluding diverse perspectives, like those of women, reduces objectivity by limiting alternative viewpoints and questions that could be asked. The document argues that including more women in science can help address implicit biases and assumptions, leading to more rigorous and objective scientific research.
Indirect-table Analysis
The document discusses indirect truth table analysis for determining the validity of arguments. It provides examples of setting up truth tables to evaluate arguments by making the conclusion false and premises true without contradictions. The examples show both valid and invalid arguments based on whether a consistent truth assignment can be found.
Truth table analysis
The document discusses how truth tables can be used to determine the logical status of propositions and arguments. Truth tables assign truth values (True/False) to propositions based on the truth values of their component statements, allowing the logical status of single propositions and groups of propositions to be determined. The logical status can be tautology, contradiction, contingent, equivalent, satisfiable/consistent, or unsatisfiable/inconsistent depending on the truth values. Validity of arguments can also be determined from truth tables by checking if the conclusion is true in all rows where the premises are true. Examples of truth tables are provided to illustrate these concepts.
Translating English to Propositional Logic
The document discusses translating statements from English to propositional logic, including:
- Conjunction and disjunction are commutative but order matters for statements with mixed operators
- How to translate conditional statements like "if P then Q" and biconditionals like "P if and only if Q"
- Necessary and sufficient conditions and how they relate to conditionals
- Examples of translating various English language statements into propositional logic statements
P160 Kuhn classroom Lecture 2
The document discusses Thomas Kuhn's concept of scientific revolutions and paradigm shifts. It explains that normal science operates within a shared paradigm, but anomalies can lead to a crisis when the paradigm is unable to solve resistant puzzles. This forces scientists to consider alternatives. When comparing paradigms like Ptolemaic vs Copernican models of planetary motion, factors like how well each addresses unsolved puzzles, fits with other theories and observations, and aesthetic appeal influence which paradigm gains acceptance. However, paradigm choices are subjective since what we observe depends on the paradigm.
Propositional logic
The document discusses translating natural language statements into propositional logic by identifying logical structures like negation, conjunction, disjunction, etc. It provides examples of translating statements involving negation (e.g. "Bill does not own a car"), conjunction (e.g. "Jenny went to the park and Bill went to the park"), disjunction (e.g. "Either my roommate will bring the textbook or my lab partner will let me borrow hers"), and discusses how to properly capture meaning and logical relationships. Key concepts covered are using variables to represent propositions, appropriate use of logical operators, and handling collective subjects, temporal sequences, and additive comparisons.
Kuhn: Paradigms and Normal Science
Thomas Kuhn argues that science operates in two distinct modes: normal science and scientific revolution. During normal science, scientists work within a shared paradigm that provides the framework and assumptions for their research. The paradigm guides what phenomena can be explained, what problems are worth studying, and how research is conducted. However, over time anomalies and resistant problems emerge that the paradigm cannot resolve, leading to a crisis and eventual shift to a new paradigm during a period of scientific revolution.
Syntax and semantics of propositional logic
Lecture introducing propositional logic, Phil 57 section 3 ("Logic and Critical Reasoning"), San Jose State University, Fall 2010.
More from Janet Stemwedel (20)
Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue
Lec16 International Strategies for Scientific Dialogue
Recently uploaded
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
ANATOMY AND BIOMECHANICS OF HIP JOINT.pdf
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
clinical examination of hip joint (1).pdf
described clinical examination all orthopeadic conditions .
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar KanvariaHow to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
Top five deadliest dog breeds in America
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
CACJapan - GROUP Presentation 1- Wk 4.pdf
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama UniversityAkanksha trivedi rama nursing college kanpur.
Natural birth techniques are various type such as/ water birth , alexender method, hypnosis, bradley method, lamaze method etcRPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS Template 2023-2024 by: Irene S. Rueco
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/y977uz6bpd3af4qsebv7r9b7s21935vdRecently uploaded (20)
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRM
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
Natural birth techniques - Mrs.Akanksha Trivedi Rama University
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH 8 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (CÓ FI...
Lec 14 Authorship Issues
- 1. Authorship issues. Phil 133 – Ethics in Science San José State University