Presentació realitzada per Remedios Melero en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).
Predatory Publications and Software Tools for IdentificationSaptarshi Ghosh
Journals that publish work without proper peer review and which charge scholars sometimes huge fees to submit should not be allowed to share space with legitimate journals and publishers, whether open access or not. These journals and publishers cheapen intellectual work by misleading scholars, preying particularly early career researchers trying to gain an edge. The credibility of scholars duped into publishing in these journals can be seriously damaged by doing so. It is important that as a scholarly community we help to protect each other from being taken advantage of in this way.
The essential mission of SRGE toward the research and education in Egypt is to foster learning and promoting research integrity in the current and next generation of researchers in Egypt. SRGE is rededicating itself to this fundamental purpose.
Workshop Part 2: Publication Ethics for Biomedical Researchers (BioMed Centra...balaram_biomedcentral
The second presentation in the 2015 BioMed Central author workshop presented at institutions in Brazil.
In this segment, Dr. Maria Kowalczuk, Biology Editor, shares information on research ethics and publication ethics, drawing from her experience as a member of the BioMed Central Research Integrity Group.
CONTENTS :
INTRODUCTION
TRANSPARENCY
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTEGRITY
EDITORIAL STANDARDS AND PROCESSES
RESPONSIBLE PUBLICATION PRACTICES
OWNERSHIP OF IDEAS AND EXPRESSION
Predatory Publications and Software Tools for IdentificationSaptarshi Ghosh
Journals that publish work without proper peer review and which charge scholars sometimes huge fees to submit should not be allowed to share space with legitimate journals and publishers, whether open access or not. These journals and publishers cheapen intellectual work by misleading scholars, preying particularly early career researchers trying to gain an edge. The credibility of scholars duped into publishing in these journals can be seriously damaged by doing so. It is important that as a scholarly community we help to protect each other from being taken advantage of in this way.
The essential mission of SRGE toward the research and education in Egypt is to foster learning and promoting research integrity in the current and next generation of researchers in Egypt. SRGE is rededicating itself to this fundamental purpose.
Workshop Part 2: Publication Ethics for Biomedical Researchers (BioMed Centra...balaram_biomedcentral
The second presentation in the 2015 BioMed Central author workshop presented at institutions in Brazil.
In this segment, Dr. Maria Kowalczuk, Biology Editor, shares information on research ethics and publication ethics, drawing from her experience as a member of the BioMed Central Research Integrity Group.
CONTENTS :
INTRODUCTION
TRANSPARENCY
PROMOTING RESEARCH INTEGRITY
EDITORIAL STANDARDS AND PROCESSES
RESPONSIBLE PUBLICATION PRACTICES
OWNERSHIP OF IDEAS AND EXPRESSION
Peer review is the most widely accepted model for setting a threshold of published scholarly material. With the move to digital publishing, it has come under attack with suggestions that it is 'broken', overloading reviewers and possibly no longer fit for purpose. This presentation discusses the challenges for peer review and some emerging new models. Ultimately, we may need to take a step back to ask what peer review is for and how these aims can best be achieved. Video available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YMla0Uc5ZE&x-yt-ts=1422327029&x-yt-cl=84838260
In the race to publish more papers, some researchers indulge in unethical practices, one of which is salami slicing. Salami slicing means fragmenting one study and publishing it in multiple papers. This practice is considered improper and can affect your career, besides being damaging to science. This SlideShare explains in detail what salami slicing is and why it is considered unethical. It also includes opinions of journal editors on the issue.
Peer Review is the Process used to judge the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer Reviewed articles are considered the best source to use when writing a research paper.
What is salami slicing?
It refers to the practice of partitioning a large study that could have been reported in a single research article into smaller published articles.
In other words, it means breaking up a single research paper into their “least publishable units,” with each paper reporting different findings from the same study.
A set of papers are referred to as salami publications when more than one paper covers the same population, methods, and research question.
When publishing research, one needs to be aware of all such actions that are unethical and hence, must be avoided. This presentation gives an overview of the topic.
The aim of this talk is to discusses some of the ethical issues that can arise during scientific publication and the peer review process and discusses their implications. The presentation covers several issue including the scientific publication ethics, misconduct, integrity of the research, authorship and peer review ethics as well as Committee on publication Ethics (COPE) ,
This PowerPoint, which was first presented to Indonesian graduate students in Indonesian Embassy Manila last March 1, 2019, aims to describe how to write and publish a research article in reputable international journals and avoid predatory publishing. It describes (1) the major types of paper and their basic structures, (2) the important steps in publishing papers in journals, and (3) the distinction between Web of Science (ISI), Scopus, and predatory journals, and differences between Impact Factor (IF) and Citescore.
2015 was a busy year for the academic publishing world, with many trend-setting practices, significant discoveries, and innovations. Editage Insights spoke to several experts from the publishing industry to know their thoughts about these trends. Here, we bring you extracts of the knowledge they shared to help you get first-hand advice on academic publication.
Presentasjon fra Helene Ingierd i forbindelse med foredraget "Research ethics, scientific misconduct and questionable practices". Foredraget ble holdt online den 23. september 2020.
Jean-Claude Bradley presents on "Peer Review and Science2.0: blogs, wikis and social networking sites" as a guest lecturer for the “Peer Review Culture in Scholarly Publication and Grantmaking” course at Drexel University. The main thrust of the presentation is that peer review alone is not capable of coping with the increasing flood of scientific information being generated and shared. Arguments are made to show that providing sufficient proof for scientific findings does scale and weakens the tragedy of the trusted source cascade.
Peer review is the most widely accepted model for setting a threshold of published scholarly material. With the move to digital publishing, it has come under attack with suggestions that it is 'broken', overloading reviewers and possibly no longer fit for purpose. This presentation discusses the challenges for peer review and some emerging new models. Ultimately, we may need to take a step back to ask what peer review is for and how these aims can best be achieved. Video available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YMla0Uc5ZE&x-yt-ts=1422327029&x-yt-cl=84838260
In the race to publish more papers, some researchers indulge in unethical practices, one of which is salami slicing. Salami slicing means fragmenting one study and publishing it in multiple papers. This practice is considered improper and can affect your career, besides being damaging to science. This SlideShare explains in detail what salami slicing is and why it is considered unethical. It also includes opinions of journal editors on the issue.
Peer Review is the Process used to judge the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer Reviewed articles are considered the best source to use when writing a research paper.
What is salami slicing?
It refers to the practice of partitioning a large study that could have been reported in a single research article into smaller published articles.
In other words, it means breaking up a single research paper into their “least publishable units,” with each paper reporting different findings from the same study.
A set of papers are referred to as salami publications when more than one paper covers the same population, methods, and research question.
When publishing research, one needs to be aware of all such actions that are unethical and hence, must be avoided. This presentation gives an overview of the topic.
The aim of this talk is to discusses some of the ethical issues that can arise during scientific publication and the peer review process and discusses their implications. The presentation covers several issue including the scientific publication ethics, misconduct, integrity of the research, authorship and peer review ethics as well as Committee on publication Ethics (COPE) ,
This PowerPoint, which was first presented to Indonesian graduate students in Indonesian Embassy Manila last March 1, 2019, aims to describe how to write and publish a research article in reputable international journals and avoid predatory publishing. It describes (1) the major types of paper and their basic structures, (2) the important steps in publishing papers in journals, and (3) the distinction between Web of Science (ISI), Scopus, and predatory journals, and differences between Impact Factor (IF) and Citescore.
2015 was a busy year for the academic publishing world, with many trend-setting practices, significant discoveries, and innovations. Editage Insights spoke to several experts from the publishing industry to know their thoughts about these trends. Here, we bring you extracts of the knowledge they shared to help you get first-hand advice on academic publication.
Presentasjon fra Helene Ingierd i forbindelse med foredraget "Research ethics, scientific misconduct and questionable practices". Foredraget ble holdt online den 23. september 2020.
Jean-Claude Bradley presents on "Peer Review and Science2.0: blogs, wikis and social networking sites" as a guest lecturer for the “Peer Review Culture in Scholarly Publication and Grantmaking” course at Drexel University. The main thrust of the presentation is that peer review alone is not capable of coping with the increasing flood of scientific information being generated and shared. Arguments are made to show that providing sufficient proof for scientific findings does scale and weakens the tragedy of the trusted source cascade.
The involvement of multiple individuals in different capacities naturally evokes the question of who should be credited and held accountable for the research published, especially since careers, ethics, and scientific integrity are at stake. This article outlines the major concepts pertaining to authorship.
This session offers insights into the reviewing process associated with academic journals, which will help you in the roles of both reviewer and author. It will offer advice and reflection on when to accept an invitation to review, and on the benefits and practicalities of the process.
Engineering Scopus indexed journals are published monthly - IFERPIFERP
The publication process is an important component in ensuring the quality of academic research. Peer review is the best way to ensure the quality of engineering journals. Sure, peer review has flaws, but there is no better alternative than allowing the world's most knowledgeable domain specialists to evaluate a research paper. Nonetheless, it is also true that peer review and editorial practices have significantly contributed to the current "replication crisis" in most academic fields. Because of the increasing competition for media attention, editors and reviewers are more likely to accept fanciful and sensationalized study results rather than less sensationalized ones. Visit iferp.in/blog/2022/09/16/monthly-published-scopus-indexed-journals-in-engineering/ to know more.
Journal article | Original research article | Qualitative and quantitative re...Pubrica
Our experienced medical writers help to write scientific papers /articles that are publishable in peer-reviewed journals. At Pubrica, we provide end-to-end support from topic selection or research area identification to writing to statistical analyses and publication support.
Visit us @ https://pubrica.com/academy/original-research-article/suggestions-given-by-peer-reviewers-in-the-introduction-section-of-the-original-research-article/
Role of Ethics in Quality Research : Interdisciplinary National Workshop Prof. Nirmal Kumar Swain
Dr Nirmal Kumar Swain, conducted a workshop on the theme 'role f ethics in quality research' on the prescribed four areas, ' Importance of literature review
2 Citation and Impact Factor
3 Consequences of plagiarism
4 Publishing successfully in reputed journals and reasons of rejection of paper in journal .
Effects of Editorial Peer Review in Enhancing the Quality of Reports of Biome...PhD Assistance
Editorial Peer Review Helps in improving the quality of biological study findings. Editorial peer review is a mechanism that is used all over the world to evaluate and enhance the quality of submissions to biomedical journals, both print and electronic. Authors benefit from the assistance offered by reviewers and from the status conferred on them by publication in journals with high peer review standards. This article conducted a review of existing evidence on the effectiveness of editorial peer review.
Read More: https://bit.ly/3ebXbZ9
Contact Us:
Website: https://www.phdassistance.com/
UK: +44 7537144372
India No:+91-9176966446
Email: info@phdassistance.com
Tutorial per aprendre a documentar-se a l'hora de fer el treball de recerca de batxillerat.
-Les parts del treball de recerca
-On trobar documents de qualitat
-Com preparar la bibliografia
Anglada, Lluís (2019). "Cloenda de la sessió". Jornada Intensiu Digital: intercanvi d'experiències en col·leccions digitals 2019. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 13 de juny de 2019.
Rodríguez, Sergio (2019). "Recuperamos, conservamos y promocionamos el patrimonio publicitario". Jornada Intensiu Digital: intercanvi d'experiències en col·leccions digitals 2019. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 13 de juny de 2019.
Vicente, Oriol (2019). "Transferència i Innovació del Patrimoni Digital: de la universitat a la comunitat". Jornada Intensiu Digital: intercanvi d'experiències en col·leccions digitals 2019. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 13 de juny de 2019.
Gumà, Montserrat (2019). "GoogleArt Project: set anys després, ha valgut la pena ser-hi?". Jornada Intensiu Digital: intercanvi d'experiències en col·leccions digitals 2019. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 13 de juny de 2019.
Hernández Güell, Marc (2019). "La Tempesta. Hibridem formats! Avancem en paradigmes". Jornada Intensiu Digital: intercanvi d'experiències en col·leccions digitals 2019. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 13 de juny de 2019.
Serra, Eugènia (2019). "Google llibres 12 anys després". Jornada Intensiu Digital: intercanvi d'experiències en col·leccions digitals 2019. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 13 de juny de 2019.
Sierra, Albert (2019). "L'ecosistema del 3D al Patrimoni Cultural". Jornada Intensiu Digital: intercanvi d'experiències en col·leccions digitals 2019. Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, 13 de juny de 2019.
Seminari «Perspectives de la recerca en comunicació».
Universitat de Barcelona, 22 setembre 2016.
Metodologías de investigación en Comunicación / José Luis Piñuel (UCM).
Seminari «Perspectives de la recerca en comunicació».
Universitat de Barcelona, 22 setembre 2016.
Revistas científicas españolas en Comunicación / Javier Guallar (UB).
Material sobre Web semàntic de Eva Ma. Méndez Rodríguez / Seminari de l'Aula Jordi Rubió i Balaguer (Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació - UB) Barcelona, 09 d'abril de 2014
Material sobre Web semàntic i Linked Open Data de Ramon Ros (CSUC) / Seminari de l'Aula Jordi Rubió i Balaguer (Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació - UB) Barcelona, 09 d'abril de 2014
Catàleg de l'exposició «Tal com érem», preparada pels estudiants de l'assignatura Documents personals: organització, conservació i ús, impartida per la professora Maria Elvira en el curs de la Universitat de l'Experiència Biblioteques i Arxius en l’Era Digital de la nostra Facultat.
L'exposició va tenir lloc el gener i febrer de 2013 al vestíbul de la planta 1 de la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació i reunia fotografies i objectes dels alumnes de la classe, com a complement d'una activitat individual que consistia en la redacció d’una autobiografia documentada.
L'objectiu de l'exposició era oferir una petita mostra de les imatges que documenten les autobiografies, i treballar des de la pràctica un altre contingut important de l'assignatura: l'ús i la difusió dels documents d'arxiu.
«La Búsqueda», presentació de Lluís Codina, Doctor en Ciències de la Informació i professor de la Universitat Pompeu Fabra (www.lluiscodina.com). Tercer seminari de l'Aula Jordi Rubió i Balaguer, curs 2012-2013 (15/05/2013)
More from Universitat de Barcelona - Facultat d’Informació i Mitjans Audiovisuals (20)
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
The Art Pastor's Guide to Sabbath | Steve ThomasonSteve Thomason
What is the purpose of the Sabbath Law in the Torah. It is interesting to compare how the context of the law shifts from Exodus to Deuteronomy. Who gets to rest, and why?
How to Create Map Views in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
The map views are useful for providing a geographical representation of data. They allow users to visualize and analyze the data in a more intuitive manner.
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How to get peer reviewed
1. Workshop How to get peer reviewed Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació, Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona, 20 June 2011 Remedios Melero
2. Peer review is both a set of mechanisms for evaluating and assuring the quality of research before and after it is funded or published. It involves subjecting research proposals and draft presentations, papers and other publications to critical evaluation by independent experts (peers). The reviewers are usually appointed by the funding body or the editors of a journal or other formal channel for communication to which the work has been submitted.
3. A peer review guide for researchers. www.rin.ac.uk/peer-review-guide
4. Scheme from NECOBELAC PORTAL It is up to the journal editor to decide which system would best ensure scientific integrity (editorial policy) and cooperation. Once a policy is chosen, it should be made clear in the instructions to authors and reviewers.
6. http://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c5729.full Conclusion Telling peer reviewers that their signed reviews might be available in the public domain on the BMJ ’s website had no important effect on review quality . Although the possibility of posting reviews online was associated with a high refusal rate among potential peer reviewers and an increase in the amount of time taken to write a review , we believe that the ethical arguments in favour of open peer review more than outweigh these disadvantages.
8. Peer review does not mean I like it Or I do not like it Peer review does not mean I accept it Or I do not accept it
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14. Training of reviewers (if possible) may help to increase the quality of the reviewing The journal should have a review form (guidelines for reviewers) to be sent to the reviewer. Support to reviewers
17. What happens when the reviewer has looked at it? What do you do then? I have to consider the reviewers’ comments and make a recommendation about whether the papers should be published in our journal. Often reviewers don’t agree about a paper , so I need to check that they are being fair and are not too harsh or too kind. If a paper covers more than one area of science, reviewers with different expertise will look at different sections of it. A paper might have both ecology and immunology aspects, for example. Sometimes these reviewers don’t agree. The person reviewing the ecology part of the paper might think it’s excellent but the person reviewing the immunology part might think it’s weak. My job is to check that the reviewers have provided the information to back up their judgements and that they have explained their views . … .. Before I make my final decisions I tell several colleagues about what I plan to do. So now I’m asking another colleague for their point of view on two papers I’d like to accept. ….
18. Peer review innovation…. ( see more cases at http://www.alpsp.org/ngen_public/default.asp?id=370 )…………….
19. http:// www.atmospheric - chemistry - and - physics.net / review / index.html Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP)
28. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=407838 James Parry, acting head of the UK Research Integrity Office (UKRIO), said it was impossible to know for certain the reasons for the increase. "It might reflect a real increase in misconduct or, more likely, an increase in detection compared with 20 years ago," he said. It shows that over nearly 20 years the number of articles produced has doubled, but the number of retractions - still a small fraction of the literature - has increased 20 times. This is equal to a tenfold increase, factoring in the growth of articles. Times Higher Education, 2009
29. Ethics and editors/reviewers/journal staff Competing interests (also called conflict of interest) Confidentiality Manuscripts, or parts thereof, or comments of reviewers, must be protected from any personal use by editors, reviewers or journal staff.
30. As with authors, it is important for the journal to have clear guidelines to avoid conflicts when articles are reviewed • Ask reviewers to disclose to the editor any potential competing interests with the paper under review • Ask reviewers to respect and maintain the confidentiality of the contents of the manuscript, and not to disclose it to anyone without the consent of the editor • Ask reviewers not to make use of, or quote from, the manuscripts they are reviewing before they are published • Ask reviewers to obtain written consent of the editor if, for any reason, they want to refer the manuscript to another colleague • Ask reviewers not to contact the author regarding the manuscript without consulting the editor • Send manuscripts to at least one foreign or external reviewer when working for a journal that serves a small scientific community, in order to avoid competing interests Key points to avoid conflict of interests