Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Of Its Days Period
(Jupiter day =9.9 hours, i.e. Jupiter has a cycle each 79.2 hours)
The hypothesis explanation
- Jupiter has a cycle during 79.2 hours = 8 of Jupiter days
- This cycle is created by Jupiter motion but effects also on Saturn and Neptune motions
Paper Objective:
- The paper tries to prove this fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet velocity is defined as a function of its diameterGerges francis
Paper hypotheses
(1)
Planet velocity is defined as a function in its diameter (or circumference)
(2)
Planets diameters and circumferences are used as periods of time for their motions.
(3)
Light Motion Is A Necessary Contributor In Planet Motion.
Paper discussion
- Uranus effect on Pluto and the Earth moon creation and motion proves the paper hypotheses.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis:
-Jupiter 8 Days Cycle (=79.2 hour) is A Cycle Produced By Pluto 8 Days Cycle (1226.4 hour)
-Pluto 8 Days Cycle Causes to create a cycle of (64 days of Jupiter days)
-Jupiter uses this 64 days cycle to create its own 8 days cycle
The Hypothesis Explanation:
-Jupiter 8 days cycle is a cycle produced by interaction found between Uranus, Jupiter and Mercury originally…
-Because this interaction is a wide and deep one, many other planets are effected by it (Pluto, Earth, Venus and the Earth moon)
-The Cycle is started by using 8 days of Pluto day period (153.3 hours x 8 = 1226.4 hours), during this period Uranus moves a distance = Jupiter motion distance during 64 days of Jupiter days period – Jupiter uses this cycle of (64 of its days period) to produce a smaller cycle which is consisted of 8 days of Jupiter days period –
- By This cycle (8 days of Jupiter days periods) Saturn and Neptune motions are effected which shows the motion transportation concept between these 3 planets
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Kepler Was Right (Planet Density Is A Function Of Its Distance) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Planet Density Is A Function Of Its Orbital Distance
As a result
Planet Velocity Is A Function Of Its Diameter
The hypothesis Explanation
- The solar planets data shows that, planet velocity is defined as a function of its diameter,
- This interesting observation we have caught before in Saturn motion, Because Saturn moves during its day period a distance equal its circumference,
- Based on this observation, the conclusion was, (Planet day period is defines based on some function between the planet velocity and its diameter)
- But – another observation has been caught – which is
- The outer planets days periods are proportional with their masses, and because of that Uranus day period is longer than Neptune's because its mass is less –
- Newton tells us that, planet velocity depends on its masses gravity
- This data total leads to conclude the paper conclusion..
Paper conclusion
- Planet velocity is created as a function of its diameter
- The paper tries to prove this fact.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper Question
- The moon orbital inclination is 5.1 degrees
- But the rate 5.1 is used frequently through the planets motions data, for example
- (Venus velocity) / (Uranus velocity) = 5.14
- (Mars velocity) / (Pluto velocity) = 5.14
- (the moon velocity) / (Neptune velocity) = 5.14
- The rate 5.1 is used among tenths of the planets motions data – the question simply is Why?
- The paper provides this data and discuss why this huge number of data rated to one another by this same rate (5.1)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
- There's a period =30589 seconds which is used in planets different motions
The hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Period = 30589 Days
- But there are many other periods based on this value as (30589 seconds, 30589 minutes and 30589 hours)
- These periods and many others are used in the planets different motions, Why?
- The solar system is a mechanical clock, each planet is a gear of this clock…
- The (gear) word doesn't mean (the planet matter) but means (the planet motion),
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Velocity Is Defined As A Function Of Its Diameter (II) (revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon is created by effect of Uranus and Pluto motions
The hypothesis explanation
- Although the Earth moon is created by Planets collisions But
- The Earth moon data is created by an effect of light motion calculations
- That supports the conclusion that (light motion must be a companying with planet motion and effect on it)
Paper questions
- The paper tries to answer the following question:
o Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days?
o Why Uranus motion distance during (5040 seconds)= Pluto motion distance during 7511 seconds.
Paper conclusion
- Light Motion Is Accompanying With Planet Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Velocity Is Defined As A Function Of Its Diameter (II)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon is created by effect of Uranus and Pluto motions
The hypothesis explanation
- Although the Earth moon is created by Planets collisions But
- The Earth moon data is created by an effect of light motion calculations
- That supports the conclusion that (light motion must be a companying with planet motion an effect on it)
Paper questions
- The paper tries to answer the following question
o Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days?
o Why Uranus motion distance during (5040 seconds)= Pluto motion distance during 7511 seconds.
Paper conclusion
- Light Motion Is Accompanying With Planet Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet velocity is defined as a function of its diameterGerges francis
Paper hypotheses
(1)
Planet velocity is defined as a function in its diameter (or circumference)
(2)
Planets diameters and circumferences are used as periods of time for their motions.
(3)
Light Motion Is A Necessary Contributor In Planet Motion.
Paper discussion
- Uranus effect on Pluto and the Earth moon creation and motion proves the paper hypotheses.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis:
-Jupiter 8 Days Cycle (=79.2 hour) is A Cycle Produced By Pluto 8 Days Cycle (1226.4 hour)
-Pluto 8 Days Cycle Causes to create a cycle of (64 days of Jupiter days)
-Jupiter uses this 64 days cycle to create its own 8 days cycle
The Hypothesis Explanation:
-Jupiter 8 days cycle is a cycle produced by interaction found between Uranus, Jupiter and Mercury originally…
-Because this interaction is a wide and deep one, many other planets are effected by it (Pluto, Earth, Venus and the Earth moon)
-The Cycle is started by using 8 days of Pluto day period (153.3 hours x 8 = 1226.4 hours), during this period Uranus moves a distance = Jupiter motion distance during 64 days of Jupiter days period – Jupiter uses this cycle of (64 of its days period) to produce a smaller cycle which is consisted of 8 days of Jupiter days period –
- By This cycle (8 days of Jupiter days periods) Saturn and Neptune motions are effected which shows the motion transportation concept between these 3 planets
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Kepler Was Right (Planet Density Is A Function Of Its Distance) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Planet Density Is A Function Of Its Orbital Distance
As a result
Planet Velocity Is A Function Of Its Diameter
The hypothesis Explanation
- The solar planets data shows that, planet velocity is defined as a function of its diameter,
- This interesting observation we have caught before in Saturn motion, Because Saturn moves during its day period a distance equal its circumference,
- Based on this observation, the conclusion was, (Planet day period is defines based on some function between the planet velocity and its diameter)
- But – another observation has been caught – which is
- The outer planets days periods are proportional with their masses, and because of that Uranus day period is longer than Neptune's because its mass is less –
- Newton tells us that, planet velocity depends on its masses gravity
- This data total leads to conclude the paper conclusion..
Paper conclusion
- Planet velocity is created as a function of its diameter
- The paper tries to prove this fact.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper Question
- The moon orbital inclination is 5.1 degrees
- But the rate 5.1 is used frequently through the planets motions data, for example
- (Venus velocity) / (Uranus velocity) = 5.14
- (Mars velocity) / (Pluto velocity) = 5.14
- (the moon velocity) / (Neptune velocity) = 5.14
- The rate 5.1 is used among tenths of the planets motions data – the question simply is Why?
- The paper provides this data and discuss why this huge number of data rated to one another by this same rate (5.1)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
- There's a period =30589 seconds which is used in planets different motions
The hypothesis explanation
- Uranus Orbital Period = 30589 Days
- But there are many other periods based on this value as (30589 seconds, 30589 minutes and 30589 hours)
- These periods and many others are used in the planets different motions, Why?
- The solar system is a mechanical clock, each planet is a gear of this clock…
- The (gear) word doesn't mean (the planet matter) but means (the planet motion),
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Velocity Is Defined As A Function Of Its Diameter (II) (revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon is created by effect of Uranus and Pluto motions
The hypothesis explanation
- Although the Earth moon is created by Planets collisions But
- The Earth moon data is created by an effect of light motion calculations
- That supports the conclusion that (light motion must be a companying with planet motion and effect on it)
Paper questions
- The paper tries to answer the following question:
o Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days?
o Why Uranus motion distance during (5040 seconds)= Pluto motion distance during 7511 seconds.
Paper conclusion
- Light Motion Is Accompanying With Planet Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Velocity Is Defined As A Function Of Its Diameter (II)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon is created by effect of Uranus and Pluto motions
The hypothesis explanation
- Although the Earth moon is created by Planets collisions But
- The Earth moon data is created by an effect of light motion calculations
- That supports the conclusion that (light motion must be a companying with planet motion an effect on it)
Paper questions
- The paper tries to answer the following question
o Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be 176 solar days?
o Why Uranus motion distance during (5040 seconds)= Pluto motion distance during 7511 seconds.
Paper conclusion
- Light Motion Is Accompanying With Planet Motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- Imagine there's another rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- How does the solar system use this rate of time in its motion?
The Question Answer Summary
- The solar system depends on the distance to use this rate of time – So- the solar system geometry creates different rates between the distance and time period
- For example
- Some planet motion uses 1 million km for 1 hour
- And another planet motion uses 1 million km for 1 solar day
- By the motion transportation between the planets these 2 different rates of time relative to the equal distances create a configuration for the general harmony.
- And based on that these 2 rates of time be parts of the general motions harmony and be parts in one machine.
- The paper provides detailed examples to explain how this system can work
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the mechanism by which the different rates of time works
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper question
How the matter is created?
The Question Explanation
(1)
- Uranus Day Period = 61920 seconds and
- (61920 seconds /12104 seconds) = 5.1 = (Venus velocity / Uranus velocity)
- Where 12104 km = Venus Diameter
(2)
- Saturn orbital period = 257928 hours = 10.7 hours x 12104 x 2
- Where 10.7 hours = Saturn Day Period
(3)
- 10.7 hours x 3600 seconds x π = 120536 seconds
- Where
- 120536 km = Saturn diameter and
- (12104 x π)2 = 120536 km x 12104 = Saturn Orbital Distance (error 1%)
- The paper argument tells that, the planet diameter is created based on geometrical calculations taken into consideration the other planets data
- Specifically, Venus diameter =12104 km because it's created based on geometrical calculations concerns Uranus Motion Data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why is Saturn Velocity 9.7 km Per Second (II) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Planet Day Period Definition
- The planet day period is the period during which the planet moves a distance = its circumference.
- Saturn follows this definition and moves during its day period 10.7 hours a distance = Saturn Circumference (error 1.3)
But
- Neptune moves during its day period (16.1 hours) a distance = 2 Neptune Circumferences
- Why not all planets follow this same definition? How the planet day period is defined?
- The paper discusses these questions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why is Saturn Velocity 9.7 km Per Second? Gerges francis
Paper Question
- Why Jupiter velocity =13.1 km per second?
- Jupiter needs by this velocity a period =10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
- But
- 10921 km = The Earth moon circumference
- How this value can be used as 10921 seconds?
- The paper tries to discover some geometrical method to solve this question
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- There's a rate of time which is (1 hour of a planet motion is equivalent to 24 hours of another planet motion)? Why is this rate required for the solar system geometry?
The Question Explanation
- Pluto motion on one side in proportionality with the 3 inner planets motions total (Mercury + Venus + Earth) on the other side –causes to create this rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Why is this rate required?
- Because this rate of time is necessary for Saturn motion –shortly – Saturn motion depends on this rate of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 4) (There's A light Beam Velocity = 1.16 mkm per second)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 million km per second.
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis proves that a light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec must be found in the universe.
- Shortly, the solar planets data is created depends on a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec. And if this light beam isn't found the solar planets data can't be created.
Paper objective
- The paper provides and discuss the planets data which proves the hypothesis.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
- The document discusses the author's hypothesis that there is an interaction between the motions of Earth, Moon, and Mars that causes Earth's 4-year rotational cycle.
- The author notes relationships between orbital periods of these bodies that current theories consider mere coincidences. The author aims to prove the motions are interacting using planetary data.
- Definitions of distance and time are proposed that view them as forms of energy observable from different frames of reference. A theory is presented that matter consists of "bright fringes" resulting from the coherence of light.
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- (1 hour = 1 day) this rate of time is produced by Uranus Motion Effect.
The hypothesis explanation
- Uranus motion causes 1 hour of a planet motion = 1 day of another planet motion –
- This process is done by Saturn motion interaction with Uranus motion –
- This rate of time is a part of the general rate of time (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 day of planet motion).
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the geometrical mechanism by which this process is done.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Does Mercury Day Period Need 5040 Seconds To Be 176 Solar Days Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon orbital inclination causes Mercury Day Period to be less than 176 solar days with 84 minutes
Paper Argument
- The paper shows that there are different interactions of motions between the planets regardless the distances between them..
- Specifically,
- The paper claims that, Uranus has a great effect on the inner plants motions and the Earth moon orbital inclination effect on Mercury Day Period is one example of different results cause by Uranus motion interaction with the inner planets motions
- The Earth moon orbital inclination effect causes Mercury day period to be less than 176 solar days with 5040 seconds.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure Proves The Following Conclusions:
Primary Conclusions
(1) Solar Group Can't be created neither by Big Bang Theory Nor Sun Gravity Concept.
(2) The Solar Group is created of Only One Energy travels through the group
(3) This one Energy creates planets matters (E=mc2 supports that) and planets orbital distances (because Space = Energy –my hypothesis)
(4) Solar Group can be similar to one train and each planet is a carriage of it.
(5) Solar Group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it
(6) Solar Group can be similar to one building and each planet is a part of it
(7) So, when a planet moves – means - this planet moves as a carriage in one train –all solar planets move together in one general motion
Paper Basic Conclusion:
Energy must be Transported from Jupiter to Earth Moon Orbit
The paper tries to prove this fact
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day) is used in the solar system motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Earth moves during its day period a distance = 2.573 mkm = Pluto motion distance during its day period (error 1%)
- The paper claims, the previous data is found because Earth and Pluto motions are used to create the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
- That means, 1 hour of Earth motion = 24 hours of Pluto motion
- This rate needs Mercury, Venus and the moon cooperation to be created.
- This idea can be supported by the fact that (The moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) =2.573 mkm = Earth motion distance during its day = Pluto motion distance during its day period (153.3 hours)
- The rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a proof for the motion transportation through the solar planets – that means- the motion is transported from a planet to another planet as among gears.
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the creation of the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
There's An Interaction Between Mercury And Jupiter Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
Mercury Motion is interacted with Jupiter Motion
That Means
Mercury Motion would be changed if Jupiter Motion changed even if no other change is occurred in the solar system.
Jupiter Motion also would be changed with any change in Mercury motion.
The interaction between Jupiter and Mercury Motions can't be explained based on the masses gravity forces
Mercury & Jupiter Motions Interaction proves that the planet motion is done depending on light motion
Where
The light motion is the distance creator and energy provider but the planet moves to follow the light motion
The Planet Motion Basic Rule "The Plant Passes The Same Distance Which Is Passed By Light Motion But With A Different Rate Of Time"
Mercury & Jupiter Motions Interaction proves this fact and shows the geometrical structure of the solar planets motions mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper objective
- The paper will test the moon motion basic equation during (17 days), day after day to see if the Equation can predict the moon distance to Earth accurately
The Moon Motion Basic Equation
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
Where
- The angle (θ) is the smallest one in Pythagoras triangle.
- The 0.985 degrees (360 degrees/ 365.25days)
- Let's remember this equation basic concept in following:
- The moon motion distance daily = 88000km, but the moon doesn't use this distance totally as a daily displacement, instead the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its real displacement. Based on that the moon uses its daily distance (88000km) as the right triangle hypotenuse and the real distance (L) will be a triangle other dimension (L = 88000 km Cos θ) where , the angle (θ) is the smallest angle in right triangle angles
- Based on that, the moon real displacement is changing with the angle (θ). But
- The greatest available displacement for the moon through the perigee orbit is 77200 km, because during 29.53 days this displacement (77200 x 29.5= 2.27mkm) an this is the perigee orbital circumference, i.e. No Greater Displacement is available through perigee orbit – so any greater displacement necessitates the moon to move higher than Perigee Radius (0r=0.363 mkm) to find more wide orbit to perform any greater displacement than 77200 km.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference(V)Gerges francis
Paper Question
- Why Jupiter motion effects on the Earth moon as similar to Uranus motion effect on Pluto? Let's prove that in following
For Jupiter
- Jupiter Velocity =13.1 km/sec, that means, Jupiter has to move during a period 10921 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km = Jupiter diameter
- where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference
For Uranus
- Uranus Velocity =6.8 km/sec, that means, Uranus has to move during a period 7511 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter
- where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
- The previous interesting data is just a window to complex relationships on both sides we have to discuss in this paper – any way the question asks directly why both planets are dealt by the same manner? Because
Paper Hypothesis
- Jupiter Orbital Distance is created as 2 Parts (778.6 mkm = 760 mkm +17.8 mkm), each one of the previous 2 relationships caused to create one part of Jupiter orbital distance
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Paper hypothesis
- The motion is transported between Venus, Saturn and Uranus
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a clock and
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) between Venus & Uranus Motions (as supposed in the previous paper)
- The motion is considered to be transported among the planets as similar to the motion transportation among the gears.
- But
- The planets aren't gears. Because of that, some different rules should control the motion transportation process (if it's found really)
Paper objective
- The paper provides a new example of (a motion transportation among the planets), in this example, the paper discussion tries to conclude the basic rules on which the motion can be transported among the planets.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 3) (Planet 8 Days Cycle)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Planets Motions depend On 2 Basic Cycles which are:
(A Cycle Of 8 Days) and (A Cycle of 6 days)
The hypothesis explanation
- The paper hypothesis tells, the solar planet motion can't be considered as an independent motion, because the planets move together based on one general system. This system uses (8 days Cycle) of some planets and (6 days Cycle) of other planets to create a general unified motion.
- Based on that the solar planets motions should be considered as (A Train Carriages Motion). The Planets move together one unified motion in which the planets motions data be complementary with each other
- That proves the claim, the solar group is created based on one geometrical design and that necessitates the planets data to be complementary with one another. by that the solar group should be considered as one machine of Gears and each planet is a gear in it.
- The (8 days) and (6 days) cycles should be used as a proof for this fact.
Paper contents
- The paper explains and discusses the 2 basic Cycles.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Triangle (General discussion) (V) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
-The moon orbital motion causes the moon orbit regression 19 degrees per sidereal year (365.25 days)
Paper Argument:
The Moon Orbital Triangle Basic Uses:
(1) The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of its orbital motion techniques, based on that, the triangle supports the moon motion equation definition.
(2) There's 2nd force effects on the moon orbital motion and this force can be concluded from the moon orbital triangle
(3) There's 2nd orbit for the moon motion, and this orbit can be discovered by the moon orbital triangle data analysis
(4) The moon orbital triangle declination angle (1.1 degrees) on the horizontal level has a massive geometrical effect on the moon motion.
(5) The triangle shows that, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is defined based on geometrical rules.
(6) The Triangle shows why the moon can't move beyond apogee orbit (r= 0.406 mkm).
Paper conclusion:
1. Earth Does A Displacement As A Result Of The Moon Orbit Regression.
2. Earth and its moon motions are interacted with each deeply
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Triangle (General discussion) (V) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon orbital motion causes the moon orbit regression 19 degrees per sidereal year (365.25 days)
Paper Argument:
The Moon Orbital Triangle Basic Uses:
(1) The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of its orbital motion techniques, based on that, the triangle supports the moon motion equation definition.
(2) There's 2nd force effects on the moon orbital motion and this force can be concluded from the moon orbital triangle
(3) There's 2nd orbit for the moon motion, and this orbit can be discovered by the moon orbital triangle data analysis
(4) The moon orbital triangle declination angle (1.1 degrees) on the horizontal level has a massive geometrical effect on the moon motion.
(5) The triangle shows that, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is defined based on geometrical rules.
(6) The Triangle shows why the moon can't move beyond apogee orbit (r= 0.406 mkm).
Paper conclusion:
1. Earth Does A Displacement As A Result Of The Moon Orbit Regression.
2. Earth and its moon motions are interacted with each deeply
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why The Moon Apogee Circumference =2.55 mkm? Gerges francis
-The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km and during 29.53 solar days the total displacements be = 2598693 km
-This distance should be the moon orbital circumference, based on that this distance 2598693 km = 2π x 413600 km
-The moon apogee radius = 406000 km
-Where the moon apogee point is the most far point the moon reach from Earth, that creates a question how the apogee radius be =406000 km instead be =413600 km?
-The difference =2%
-This question is solved by explain the moon Pythagorean triangle technique.
-In this technique the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level and by that the real displacement (L) will be shorter than 88000 km where (L = 88000 cos (θ)).
-As a result the total (real) displacements will be shorter than 2598693 km and be limited to 2550973 km where the apogee radius be 406000 km NOT 413600 km.
Uranus is perpendicular on earth moon orbit (viii) (revised)Gerges francis
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VIII) (revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The moon and Pluto motions are transported from one to another through the solar planets motions.
Paper Investigation
- We analyze the moon orbital triangle to see this motion transportation
Paper conclusion
- Planet diameter is created based on this planet motion
- There's a transportation of motion between the Earth moon and Pluto.
- The planets do this motion transportation, that causes this motion features to be seen on all planets motions
- The argument proves that, the planets can't be considered as separated masses points, on the contrary they are knots in the same rope, where all solar planets are created from the same one trajectory of energy and move by it.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- Imagine there's another rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- How does the solar system use this rate of time in its motion?
The Question Answer Summary
- The solar system depends on the distance to use this rate of time – So- the solar system geometry creates different rates between the distance and time period
- For example
- Some planet motion uses 1 million km for 1 hour
- And another planet motion uses 1 million km for 1 solar day
- By the motion transportation between the planets these 2 different rates of time relative to the equal distances create a configuration for the general harmony.
- And based on that these 2 rates of time be parts of the general motions harmony and be parts in one machine.
- The paper provides detailed examples to explain how this system can work
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the mechanism by which the different rates of time works
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper question
How the matter is created?
The Question Explanation
(1)
- Uranus Day Period = 61920 seconds and
- (61920 seconds /12104 seconds) = 5.1 = (Venus velocity / Uranus velocity)
- Where 12104 km = Venus Diameter
(2)
- Saturn orbital period = 257928 hours = 10.7 hours x 12104 x 2
- Where 10.7 hours = Saturn Day Period
(3)
- 10.7 hours x 3600 seconds x π = 120536 seconds
- Where
- 120536 km = Saturn diameter and
- (12104 x π)2 = 120536 km x 12104 = Saturn Orbital Distance (error 1%)
- The paper argument tells that, the planet diameter is created based on geometrical calculations taken into consideration the other planets data
- Specifically, Venus diameter =12104 km because it's created based on geometrical calculations concerns Uranus Motion Data.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why is Saturn Velocity 9.7 km Per Second (II) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Planet Day Period Definition
- The planet day period is the period during which the planet moves a distance = its circumference.
- Saturn follows this definition and moves during its day period 10.7 hours a distance = Saturn Circumference (error 1.3)
But
- Neptune moves during its day period (16.1 hours) a distance = 2 Neptune Circumferences
- Why not all planets follow this same definition? How the planet day period is defined?
- The paper discusses these questions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why is Saturn Velocity 9.7 km Per Second? Gerges francis
Paper Question
- Why Jupiter velocity =13.1 km per second?
- Jupiter needs by this velocity a period =10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
- But
- 10921 km = The Earth moon circumference
- How this value can be used as 10921 seconds?
- The paper tries to discover some geometrical method to solve this question
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- There's a rate of time which is (1 hour of a planet motion is equivalent to 24 hours of another planet motion)? Why is this rate required for the solar system geometry?
The Question Explanation
- Pluto motion on one side in proportionality with the 3 inner planets motions total (Mercury + Venus + Earth) on the other side –causes to create this rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Why is this rate required?
- Because this rate of time is necessary for Saturn motion –shortly – Saturn motion depends on this rate of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 4) (There's A light Beam Velocity = 1.16 mkm per second)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 million km per second.
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis proves that a light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec must be found in the universe.
- Shortly, the solar planets data is created depends on a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec. And if this light beam isn't found the solar planets data can't be created.
Paper objective
- The paper provides and discuss the planets data which proves the hypothesis.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
- The document discusses the author's hypothesis that there is an interaction between the motions of Earth, Moon, and Mars that causes Earth's 4-year rotational cycle.
- The author notes relationships between orbital periods of these bodies that current theories consider mere coincidences. The author aims to prove the motions are interacting using planetary data.
- Definitions of distance and time are proposed that view them as forms of energy observable from different frames of reference. A theory is presented that matter consists of "bright fringes" resulting from the coherence of light.
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- (1 hour = 1 day) this rate of time is produced by Uranus Motion Effect.
The hypothesis explanation
- Uranus motion causes 1 hour of a planet motion = 1 day of another planet motion –
- This process is done by Saturn motion interaction with Uranus motion –
- This rate of time is a part of the general rate of time (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 day of planet motion).
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the geometrical mechanism by which this process is done.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Does Mercury Day Period Need 5040 Seconds To Be 176 Solar Days Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon orbital inclination causes Mercury Day Period to be less than 176 solar days with 84 minutes
Paper Argument
- The paper shows that there are different interactions of motions between the planets regardless the distances between them..
- Specifically,
- The paper claims that, Uranus has a great effect on the inner plants motions and the Earth moon orbital inclination effect on Mercury Day Period is one example of different results cause by Uranus motion interaction with the inner planets motions
- The Earth moon orbital inclination effect causes Mercury day period to be less than 176 solar days with 5040 seconds.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure Proves The Following Conclusions:
Primary Conclusions
(1) Solar Group Can't be created neither by Big Bang Theory Nor Sun Gravity Concept.
(2) The Solar Group is created of Only One Energy travels through the group
(3) This one Energy creates planets matters (E=mc2 supports that) and planets orbital distances (because Space = Energy –my hypothesis)
(4) Solar Group can be similar to one train and each planet is a carriage of it.
(5) Solar Group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in it
(6) Solar Group can be similar to one building and each planet is a part of it
(7) So, when a planet moves – means - this planet moves as a carriage in one train –all solar planets move together in one general motion
Paper Basic Conclusion:
Energy must be Transported from Jupiter to Earth Moon Orbit
The paper tries to prove this fact
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 1 solar day) is used in the solar system motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Earth moves during its day period a distance = 2.573 mkm = Pluto motion distance during its day period (error 1%)
- The paper claims, the previous data is found because Earth and Pluto motions are used to create the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
- That means, 1 hour of Earth motion = 24 hours of Pluto motion
- This rate needs Mercury, Venus and the moon cooperation to be created.
- This idea can be supported by the fact that (The moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) =2.573 mkm = Earth motion distance during its day = Pluto motion distance during its day period (153.3 hours)
- The rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a proof for the motion transportation through the solar planets – that means- the motion is transported from a planet to another planet as among gears.
Paper objective
- The paper discusses the creation of the rate of time (1 hour =1 solar day)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Hypothesis
There's An Interaction Between Mercury And Jupiter Motion
The Hypothesis Explanation
Mercury Motion is interacted with Jupiter Motion
That Means
Mercury Motion would be changed if Jupiter Motion changed even if no other change is occurred in the solar system.
Jupiter Motion also would be changed with any change in Mercury motion.
The interaction between Jupiter and Mercury Motions can't be explained based on the masses gravity forces
Mercury & Jupiter Motions Interaction proves that the planet motion is done depending on light motion
Where
The light motion is the distance creator and energy provider but the planet moves to follow the light motion
The Planet Motion Basic Rule "The Plant Passes The Same Distance Which Is Passed By Light Motion But With A Different Rate Of Time"
Mercury & Jupiter Motions Interaction proves this fact and shows the geometrical structure of the solar planets motions mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper objective
- The paper will test the moon motion basic equation during (17 days), day after day to see if the Equation can predict the moon distance to Earth accurately
The Moon Motion Basic Equation
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
Where
- The angle (θ) is the smallest one in Pythagoras triangle.
- The 0.985 degrees (360 degrees/ 365.25days)
- Let's remember this equation basic concept in following:
- The moon motion distance daily = 88000km, but the moon doesn't use this distance totally as a daily displacement, instead the moon uses Pythagoras triangle to define its real displacement. Based on that the moon uses its daily distance (88000km) as the right triangle hypotenuse and the real distance (L) will be a triangle other dimension (L = 88000 km Cos θ) where , the angle (θ) is the smallest angle in right triangle angles
- Based on that, the moon real displacement is changing with the angle (θ). But
- The greatest available displacement for the moon through the perigee orbit is 77200 km, because during 29.53 days this displacement (77200 x 29.5= 2.27mkm) an this is the perigee orbital circumference, i.e. No Greater Displacement is available through perigee orbit – so any greater displacement necessitates the moon to move higher than Perigee Radius (0r=0.363 mkm) to find more wide orbit to perform any greater displacement than 77200 km.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference(V)Gerges francis
Paper Question
- Why Jupiter motion effects on the Earth moon as similar to Uranus motion effect on Pluto? Let's prove that in following
For Jupiter
- Jupiter Velocity =13.1 km/sec, that means, Jupiter has to move during a period 10921 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km = Jupiter diameter
- where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference
For Uranus
- Uranus Velocity =6.8 km/sec, that means, Uranus has to move during a period 7511 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter
- where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
- The previous interesting data is just a window to complex relationships on both sides we have to discuss in this paper – any way the question asks directly why both planets are dealt by the same manner? Because
Paper Hypothesis
- Jupiter Orbital Distance is created as 2 Parts (778.6 mkm = 760 mkm +17.8 mkm), each one of the previous 2 relationships caused to create one part of Jupiter orbital distance
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Paper hypothesis
- The motion is transported between Venus, Saturn and Uranus
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a clock and
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) between Venus & Uranus Motions (as supposed in the previous paper)
- The motion is considered to be transported among the planets as similar to the motion transportation among the gears.
- But
- The planets aren't gears. Because of that, some different rules should control the motion transportation process (if it's found really)
Paper objective
- The paper provides a new example of (a motion transportation among the planets), in this example, the paper discussion tries to conclude the basic rules on which the motion can be transported among the planets.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 3) (Planet 8 Days Cycle)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Planets Motions depend On 2 Basic Cycles which are:
(A Cycle Of 8 Days) and (A Cycle of 6 days)
The hypothesis explanation
- The paper hypothesis tells, the solar planet motion can't be considered as an independent motion, because the planets move together based on one general system. This system uses (8 days Cycle) of some planets and (6 days Cycle) of other planets to create a general unified motion.
- Based on that the solar planets motions should be considered as (A Train Carriages Motion). The Planets move together one unified motion in which the planets motions data be complementary with each other
- That proves the claim, the solar group is created based on one geometrical design and that necessitates the planets data to be complementary with one another. by that the solar group should be considered as one machine of Gears and each planet is a gear in it.
- The (8 days) and (6 days) cycles should be used as a proof for this fact.
Paper contents
- The paper explains and discusses the 2 basic Cycles.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Questions
How to describe the Moon Motion Trajectory?
Let's review our conclusions in following:
- The research 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- The research 2nd one (light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 day)
- The 2nd hypothesis tells that there are different rates of time in the solar system,
- The basic rule tells (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
The Moon Orbital Motion Trajectory:
- Earth moves per solar day a distance =2.58 million km with an angle =0.985 deg on the horizontal line, the moon moves a very similar motion to Earth motion
- If there's no (Lorentz Length Contraction phenomenon) in the solar system, the moon motion would be as a parallel line to Earth motion trajectory … but
- Because of the contraction rate (1.0725) the moon motion distance daily (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be 2.41 mkm
- The difference (2.58 mkm -2.41 mkm) is a distance required necessary to be added to the moon motion distance to save the moon and Earth motions accompanying.
- 0.17 mkm is required to be passed daily
- The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km depending on Earth Gravity
- But, Earth Mass = The 4 Inner Planets Masses Total (error 1%)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Triangle (General discussion) (V) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
-The moon orbital motion causes the moon orbit regression 19 degrees per sidereal year (365.25 days)
Paper Argument:
The Moon Orbital Triangle Basic Uses:
(1) The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of its orbital motion techniques, based on that, the triangle supports the moon motion equation definition.
(2) There's 2nd force effects on the moon orbital motion and this force can be concluded from the moon orbital triangle
(3) There's 2nd orbit for the moon motion, and this orbit can be discovered by the moon orbital triangle data analysis
(4) The moon orbital triangle declination angle (1.1 degrees) on the horizontal level has a massive geometrical effect on the moon motion.
(5) The triangle shows that, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is defined based on geometrical rules.
(6) The Triangle shows why the moon can't move beyond apogee orbit (r= 0.406 mkm).
Paper conclusion:
1. Earth Does A Displacement As A Result Of The Moon Orbit Regression.
2. Earth and its moon motions are interacted with each deeply
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Triangle (General discussion) (V) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon orbital motion causes the moon orbit regression 19 degrees per sidereal year (365.25 days)
Paper Argument:
The Moon Orbital Triangle Basic Uses:
(1) The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of its orbital motion techniques, based on that, the triangle supports the moon motion equation definition.
(2) There's 2nd force effects on the moon orbital motion and this force can be concluded from the moon orbital triangle
(3) There's 2nd orbit for the moon motion, and this orbit can be discovered by the moon orbital triangle data analysis
(4) The moon orbital triangle declination angle (1.1 degrees) on the horizontal level has a massive geometrical effect on the moon motion.
(5) The triangle shows that, the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is defined based on geometrical rules.
(6) The Triangle shows why the moon can't move beyond apogee orbit (r= 0.406 mkm).
Paper conclusion:
1. Earth Does A Displacement As A Result Of The Moon Orbit Regression.
2. Earth and its moon motions are interacted with each deeply
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why The Moon Apogee Circumference =2.55 mkm? Gerges francis
-The moon moves daily a displacement =88000 km and during 29.53 solar days the total displacements be = 2598693 km
-This distance should be the moon orbital circumference, based on that this distance 2598693 km = 2π x 413600 km
-The moon apogee radius = 406000 km
-Where the moon apogee point is the most far point the moon reach from Earth, that creates a question how the apogee radius be =406000 km instead be =413600 km?
-The difference =2%
-This question is solved by explain the moon Pythagorean triangle technique.
-In this technique the moon creates an angle (θ) between its displacement motion direction and its orbit horizontal level and by that the real displacement (L) will be shorter than 88000 km where (L = 88000 cos (θ)).
-As a result the total (real) displacements will be shorter than 2598693 km and be limited to 2550973 km where the apogee radius be 406000 km NOT 413600 km.
Uranus is perpendicular on earth moon orbit (viii) (revised)Gerges francis
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VIII) (revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The moon and Pluto motions are transported from one to another through the solar planets motions.
Paper Investigation
- We analyze the moon orbital triangle to see this motion transportation
Paper conclusion
- Planet diameter is created based on this planet motion
- There's a transportation of motion between the Earth moon and Pluto.
- The planets do this motion transportation, that causes this motion features to be seen on all planets motions
- The argument proves that, the planets can't be considered as separated masses points, on the contrary they are knots in the same rope, where all solar planets are created from the same one trajectory of energy and move by it.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus is perpendicular on earth moon orbit (viii)Gerges francis
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VIII)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The moon and Pluto motions are transported from one to another through the solar planets motions.
Paper Investigation
- We analyze the moon orbital triangle to see this motion transportation
Paper conclusion
- Planet diameter is created based on this planet motion
- There's a transportation of motion between the Earth moon and Pluto.
- The planets do this motion transportation, that causes this motion features to be seen on all planets motions
- The argument proves that, the planets can't be considered as separated masses points, on the contrary they are knots in the same rope, where all solar planets are created from the same one trajectory of energy and move by it.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper tries to prove this fact
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper Question
How to form the required hypothesis?
The Question Explanation
- The data analysis method 1st step is (The Directed Data Definition)
- The data analysis method 2nd step is (The hypothesis formation)
- The hypothesis is the task without which the data can't create any meaning.
- The hypothesis basically tries to answer (How the directed data is created?)
- Sometimes the data be so difficult to enable any hypothesis to be formed but the hypothesis is a basic step can't be canceled, in this case such data can not be used.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This document presents a hypothesis that Earth's motion is the source of light energy in the solar system. The author proposes that Earth's velocity around the sun produces a beam of light equal to the supposed velocity of light. Various equations are presented analyzing distances, velocities, and time periods related to Earth's orbit and the orbits of other planets and celestial bodies. The author concludes that Earth is the source of energy for the entire solar system. References are provided for the author's other works on similar topics analyzing planetary motion and trajectories.
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (III)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Planet Day Period Definition : The Period Through Which The Planet Moves A Distance = Its Circumference.
Paper Question No. (1)
Is There An Interaction Between The Earth Moon & Jupiter Motions?
- Because
- Jupiter Diameter 142984 = The Earth Moon Circumference 10921 km x 13.1
- Where
- 13.1 km /sec = Jupiter Velocity …………And
- 13.18 degrees = the Earth moon motion degrees per solar day
- Shortly
- Are these 2 values (13.1 and 13.18) created depending on each other
- Which proves an interaction between Jupiter & the Earth moon Velocities
Paper Question No. (2)
If This interaction is found, can it effect on both Planets Days Periods?
- The paper discusses these questions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Light Effects On Plant Motion By Undefined Force Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-Light Motion Effects On Planet Motion By Undefined Force
The hypothesis Explanation
-The solar system motions can't be explained by Classical Machines Laws!
-Because Light motion effects on planet motion by undefined force, resulting all classical mechanics laws clearly be violated by planets motions.
Example No. (1)
o Jupiter velocity =13.1 km/sec, i.e. Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter, where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference! And
o (Jupiter orbital circumference = Jupiter circumference x 10921)
o Uranus velocity =6.8 km, i.e. Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = 51118 km = Uranus diameter, where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
o (Uranus Pluto distance =Pluto velocity per solar day x 7511)
Example No. (2)
o 13.18 degrees = the moon motion degrees per solar day/ 0.526 degrees (Mars motion degrees per solar day) =25.2 (where Mars axial tilt =25.2 deg)
o (687 days Mars orbital period = 27.3 days the moon orbital period) x 25.2
Example No. (3)
o Light velocity (0.3mkm/sec) = Earth velocity x 10000 But
o 365.25 days (Earth year) x 27.3 days (the moon orbital period) =10000
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Let's remember our main argument in this papers series "Matter Creation Principle"
I have claimed the following:
(1) Light with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec travels for 1 second period only
(2) Light Motion for 1Second causes Planet to move for 1 solar day
(3) Based on Planet motion for 1 solar day – Solar Planets are created…
(4) Specifically – Pluto motion for 1 solar day is a result of light motion for 1 second period (light velocity =1.16 mkm/sec) and based on Pluto motion for 1 solar day – the planets diameters are created that's why Pluto Motion Distance Daily = 406000 km= Planets Diameters Total
But
(5) We have discovered that Earth Moon Orbit defines solar Planets diameters Where
a. Apogee Radius = Solar Planets Diameters Total
b. Perigee Radius = Outer Planets Diameters Total
c. Apogee–Perigee Distance =inner planets diameters total =Earth Circumference
(6) Based on the previous data we have concluded that (1st Conclusion) Pluto and Earth Moon together effect on Solar Planets Diameters Creation process (2nd Conclusion) light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec is sent from Pluto to Earth causes the Earth Axial Tilt (23.45degrees)
Also
(7) We have discovered that 2 Jupiter Diameters +1 Saturn Diameter = Solar Planets Diameters Total =406000 km
(8) i.e. Jupiter Diameter = 8 Planets Diameters Total
(9) These relationships are depended also on light beam velocity 1.16 mkm /sec
What we need to do in this paper?
The previous claim is a heavy one, so we need to discuss (1st) More Proves & Details (2nd) How does this machine work?
Let's start immediately…
Please Note
Paper Methodology is mentioned in "Matter Creation Principle (Part III)"
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VII) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Uranus effect on the moon orbit causes the period of 1 hour (of a planet motion) to be equivalent to 1 solar day (of another planet motion)
- We still analyze the interesting data (the moon circumference =10921 km)
o Pluto moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Uranus diameter
o Jupiter moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Jupiter diameter
o But
o 51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 6.8 km/sc x 7511 seconds, the equation tells that, Uranus has to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = Uranus diameter (where 7511 km = Pluto circumference) – On The Other Side- Pluto has to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass (by rotation) 7511 km x6.8 = 51118 km (a distance = Uranus diameter)
o 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) = 13.1 km/sc x 10921 seconds, Jupiter moves 10921 seconds for its diameter and On The Other Side the moon has to rotate around its axis 13.1 times to pass a distance = Jupiter diameter
Paper question
o What geometrical mechanism behind this data?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper hypothesis:
- 2 New Cycles are discovered which are:
o A Cycle of 8 of Pluto Days Period (1226.4 hours)
o A Cycle of 8 of Jupiter Days Period (79.2 hours)
o Jupiter Day Cycle depends on Pluto Day Cycle
Paper Argument:
- The new discovered cycles proves the following arguments
o The motion energy is transported from Uranus to Jupiter then to Saturn (Or from Neptune to Uranus to Jupiter and then to Saturn)
o Planet Circumference is a player effects on the produced cycles by this planet motion.
o Planets Motions are a network created based on interactions between these planets motions – Planets data is created based on this network motions interactions.
o Saturn data is effected by Uranus and Neptune Motions Interaction.
The Earth moon is a planet found inside basic motions interactions and because of that, Its data is effected by almost (all) planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Venus Motion = 24 hours of Uranus Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a great clock, its basic task is to uses a motion of 1 second (a light beam motion) to produce a motion of 1 solar day ( a planet motion)
- Because of that, the rate of time 1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours is used
- I claim, 1 hour of Venus motion is equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- This rate of time is produced by geometrical mechanism and interaction between the planets motions – for that – the light beam velocity isn't used to produce this rate directly by Lorentz Transformations
- This data is so important because it tells there's another method by which a different rate of time can be created – we discuss this method in this paper and tries to see how this different rate of time is produced by a motion transportation among the planets as among the gears
- The paper uses Venus rotation period as a platform for its discussion to explain ho this rate of time be created
- This rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a part of the great rate of time (1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day) – we discuss in this paper the rate (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-The Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets.
The hypothesis explanation
-The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km
-Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during (153.3 h) a distance = 2593836 km
-Why These Distances Are Equal?
-How the motion at distance be done? or by what geometrical mechanism the masses gravity causes a motion at distance? These questions still need answers
- The motion transportation among the planets can be answer for these questions.
- What does mean "A motion Transportation"?
- It means, a planet motion causes another planet to move, and this motion depends on the planet motion and not on its masses gravity only. That tells, the motion transportation process must be done based on new geometrical rules.
- If the paper hypothesis is true and the motion is transported among the solar planets, that will answer why these 2 distances are equal? Because the motion is transported from one planet to another and by that the 2 planets move equal distances in defined periods of time.
Paper objective
- The paper tries to prove that, the motion is transported from a planet to another planet through the solar system and this motion transportation caused Pluto motion distance during its day period to be = the moon displacements total
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference (II)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Planet Day Period Definition
The Period Through Which The Planet Moves A Distance = Its Circumference.
The hypothesis Explanation
- Saturn and Jupiter velocities support the paper hypothesis
- But
- The other planets don’t follow this same rule ….Why?
- Because
- The motion is transported through the (outer planets) as motion of gears, i.e. Each planet defines the next planet motion.
- Then
- The outer planets motions total is balanced with the inner planets motions to create a general harmony for the solar system.. the motion transportation provides a strong proof that, the solar system in one geometrical building and no planet can be considered as a separated point from the whole trajectory of energy which created the solar system.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Is There another Orbit For The Moon Motion? Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis No. (1)
-Another Orbit must be found for the moon motion.
Paper Hypothesis No. (2)
-An interaction is found between Jupiter and the Earth moon motions, this interaction shows that another orbit must be found for the moon motion –
Paper Objective
-The paper tries to prove that, there's an interaction between Jupiter and the moon motion.
-And
-Based on this interaction, Jupiter effect on the moon motion suggests that another orbit is required necessary for the moon orbital motion.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- The document discusses Mercury's rotation period and orbital period, and how they relate to other astronomical cycles and periods in the solar system, including Pluto's orbital period. Complex equations are presented relating distances, velocities, and time periods of various astronomical bodies. The author's conclusion is that a light beam traveling before planets created the dimensions of matter, space and time, and planets follow these dimensions like a "slave follows its master."
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
The document discusses Kepler's law that a planet's orbit defines its velocity. It provides 5 points to explain this: 1) Planet data is based on exact equations, not random factors. 2) A planet's diameter should be indirectly related to its orbital distance to avoid breaking during motion. 3) A planet's mass affects its orbital inclination and limits variables in diameter equations. 4) A function is needed between a planet's orbit and velocity to connect variables like rotation period. 5) Newton's gravity theory and the Big Bang theory are incorrect because planet data requires exact geometrical rules, not chaos. The document aims to show planetary motions result from one precise geometrical design, not random forces.
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
A Research Presentation Summary
Abstract
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (No Planet moves by the sun gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation and using to prove (Mars Migration Theory) and (The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Planet Data Analysis As Astrophysics Scientific Method.pdfGerges francis
Planet Data Analysis As Astrophysics Scientific Method
Abstract
Paper Discovery
- Planet Data Analysis should be considered the astrophysics research basic method.
- The paper proves that – We have to use planets data analysis to discover how the solar system be created and moving – the method provides safe approaches to conclude the facts and protects from the imaginary ideas –
- On the other side –
- Planets data analysis method proves – The big bang theory is wrong and Newton theory of the sun gravity is wrong – (also the method proves one light beam its velocity 1.16 million km per second be found) –
- The method opens a new page in the physics book because it provides a new source of knowledge to discover how the solar system be created and moving.
- The paper provides a new concept tells
(Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Rules And Exact Equations)
And (One Law Controls All Planets Data)
- Based on this new concept – Planet Data Analysis can show The Geometrical Rules based on which this planet be created and moving.
- The paper explains and proves the idea shortly.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Planet Data Depends On 5 Equations (Revised).pdfGerges francis
Planet Data Depends On 5 Equations (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet data means
- (Planet Mass, Diameter, Orbital Distance, Period, Inclination, Rotation Period And Axial Tilt) (Planet Fact Sheet)
- Planet data be created based on exact equations as a plane creation process.
- The creation process uses exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all other specifications and data
- The paper proves that based on 5 equations the planets data be created
- The paper disproves any random process, initial conditions or unknown historical factors to be effective on the planet data creation.
- On the contrary,
- The paper proves (Based On Exact Equations The Planet Data Be Created)
- The equations are
- (1) Planet Orbital Distance Equation
- d2 = 4 d0 (d-d0)
- d = A Planet Orbital Distance
- d0= Its Direct Previous Neighbor Planet Orbital Distance
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Microbial interaction
Microorganisms interacts with each other and can be physically associated with another organisms in a variety of ways.
One organism can be located on the surface of another organism as an ectobiont or located within another organism as endobiont.
Microbial interaction may be positive such as mutualism, proto-cooperation, commensalism or may be negative such as parasitism, predation or competition
Types of microbial interaction
Positive interaction: mutualism, proto-cooperation, commensalism
Negative interaction: Ammensalism (antagonism), parasitism, predation, competition
I. Mutualism:
It is defined as the relationship in which each organism in interaction gets benefits from association. It is an obligatory relationship in which mutualist and host are metabolically dependent on each other.
Mutualistic relationship is very specific where one member of association cannot be replaced by another species.
Mutualism require close physical contact between interacting organisms.
Relationship of mutualism allows organisms to exist in habitat that could not occupied by either species alone.
Mutualistic relationship between organisms allows them to act as a single organism.
Examples of mutualism:
i. Lichens:
Lichens are excellent example of mutualism.
They are the association of specific fungi and certain genus of algae. In lichen, fungal partner is called mycobiont and algal partner is called
II. Syntrophism:
It is an association in which the growth of one organism either depends on or improved by the substrate provided by another organism.
In syntrophism both organism in association gets benefits.
Compound A
Utilized by population 1
Compound B
Utilized by population 2
Compound C
utilized by both Population 1+2
Products
In this theoretical example of syntrophism, population 1 is able to utilize and metabolize compound A, forming compound B but cannot metabolize beyond compound B without co-operation of population 2. Population 2is unable to utilize compound A but it can metabolize compound B forming compound C. Then both population 1 and 2 are able to carry out metabolic reaction which leads to formation of end product that neither population could produce alone.
Examples of syntrophism:
i. Methanogenic ecosystem in sludge digester
Methane produced by methanogenic bacteria depends upon interspecies hydrogen transfer by other fermentative bacteria.
Anaerobic fermentative bacteria generate CO2 and H2 utilizing carbohydrates which is then utilized by methanogenic bacteria (Methanobacter) to produce methane.
ii. Lactobacillus arobinosus and Enterococcus faecalis:
In the minimal media, Lactobacillus arobinosus and Enterococcus faecalis are able to grow together but not alone.
The synergistic relationship between E. faecalis and L. arobinosus occurs in which E. faecalis require folic acid
PPT on Alternate Wetting and Drying presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...Sérgio Sacani
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
PPT on Direct Seeded Rice presented at the three-day 'Training and Validation Workshop on Modules of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Technologies in South Asia' workshop on April 22, 2024.
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...Leonel Morgado
Current descriptions of immersive learning cases are often difficult or impossible to compare. This is due to a myriad of different options on what details to include, which aspects are relevant, and on the descriptive approaches employed. Also, these aspects often combine very specific details with more general guidelines or indicate intents and rationales without clarifying their implementation. In this paper we provide a method to describe immersive learning cases that is structured to enable comparisons, yet flexible enough to allow researchers and practitioners to decide which aspects to include. This method leverages a taxonomy that classifies educational aspects at three levels (uses, practices, and strategies) and then utilizes two frameworks, the Immersive Learning Brain and the Immersion Cube, to enable a structured description and interpretation of immersive learning cases. The method is then demonstrated on a published immersive learning case on training for wind turbine maintenance using virtual reality. Applying the method results in a structured artifact, the Immersive Learning Case Sheet, that tags the case with its proximal uses, practices, and strategies, and refines the free text case description to ensure that matching details are included. This contribution is thus a case description method in support of future comparative research of immersive learning cases. We then discuss how the resulting description and interpretation can be leveraged to change immersion learning cases, by enriching them (considering low-effort changes or additions) or innovating (exploring more challenging avenues of transformation). The method holds significant promise to support better-grounded research in immersive learning.
Anti-Universe And Emergent Gravity and the Dark UniverseSérgio Sacani
Recent theoretical progress indicates that spacetime and gravity emerge together from the entanglement structure of an underlying microscopic theory. These ideas are best understood in Anti-de Sitter space, where they rely on the area law for entanglement entropy. The extension to de Sitter space requires taking into account the entropy and temperature associated with the cosmological horizon. Using insights from string theory, black hole physics and quantum information theory we argue that the positive dark energy leads to a thermal volume law contribution to the entropy that overtakes the area law precisely at the cosmological horizon. Due to the competition between area and volume law entanglement the microscopic de Sitter states do not thermalise at sub-Hubble scales: they exhibit memory effects in the form of an entropy displacement caused by matter. The emergent laws of gravity contain an additional ‘dark’ gravitational force describing the ‘elastic’ response due to the entropy displacement. We derive an estimate of the strength of this extra force in terms of the baryonic mass, Newton’s constant and the Hubble acceleration scale a0 = cH0, and provide evidence for the fact that this additional ‘dark gravity force’ explains the observed phenomena in galaxies and clusters currently attributed to dark matter.
The cost of acquiring information by natural selectionCarl Bergstrom
This is a short talk that I gave at the Banff International Research Station workshop on Modeling and Theory in Population Biology. The idea is to try to understand how the burden of natural selection relates to the amount of information that selection puts into the genome.
It's based on the first part of this research paper:
The cost of information acquisition by natural selection
Ryan Seamus McGee, Olivia Kosterlitz, Artem Kaznatcheev, Benjamin Kerr, Carl T. Bergstrom
bioRxiv 2022.07.02.498577; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.02.498577
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
(June 12, 2024) Webinar: Development of PET theranostics targeting the molecu...Scintica Instrumentation
Targeting Hsp90 and its pathogen Orthologs with Tethered Inhibitors as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategy for cancer and infectious diseases with Dr. Timothy Haystead.
Candidate young stellar objects in the S-cluster: Kinematic analysis of a sub...Sérgio Sacani
Context. The observation of several L-band emission sources in the S cluster has led to a rich discussion of their nature. However, a definitive answer to the classification of the dusty objects requires an explanation for the detection of compact Doppler-shifted Brγ emission. The ionized hydrogen in combination with the observation of mid-infrared L-band continuum emission suggests that most of these sources are embedded in a dusty envelope. These embedded sources are part of the S-cluster, and their relationship to the S-stars is still under debate. To date, the question of the origin of these two populations has been vague, although all explanations favor migration processes for the individual cluster members. Aims. This work revisits the S-cluster and its dusty members orbiting the supermassive black hole SgrA* on bound Keplerian orbits from a kinematic perspective. The aim is to explore the Keplerian parameters for patterns that might imply a nonrandom distribution of the sample. Additionally, various analytical aspects are considered to address the nature of the dusty sources. Methods. Based on the photometric analysis, we estimated the individual H−K and K−L colors for the source sample and compared the results to known cluster members. The classification revealed a noticeable contrast between the S-stars and the dusty sources. To fit the flux-density distribution, we utilized the radiative transfer code HYPERION and implemented a young stellar object Class I model. We obtained the position angle from the Keplerian fit results; additionally, we analyzed the distribution of the inclinations and the longitudes of the ascending node. Results. The colors of the dusty sources suggest a stellar nature consistent with the spectral energy distribution in the near and midinfrared domains. Furthermore, the evaporation timescales of dusty and gaseous clumps in the vicinity of SgrA* are much shorter ( 2yr) than the epochs covered by the observations (≈15yr). In addition to the strong evidence for the stellar classification of the D-sources, we also find a clear disk-like pattern following the arrangements of S-stars proposed in the literature. Furthermore, we find a global intrinsic inclination for all dusty sources of 60 ± 20◦, implying a common formation process. Conclusions. The pattern of the dusty sources manifested in the distribution of the position angles, inclinations, and longitudes of the ascending node strongly suggests two different scenarios: the main-sequence stars and the dusty stellar S-cluster sources share a common formation history or migrated with a similar formation channel in the vicinity of SgrA*. Alternatively, the gravitational influence of SgrA* in combination with a massive perturber, such as a putative intermediate mass black hole in the IRS 13 cluster, forces the dusty objects and S-stars to follow a particular orbital arrangement. Key words. stars: black holes– stars: formation– Galaxy: center– galaxies: star formation
The debris of the ‘last major merger’ is dynamically youngSérgio Sacani
The Milky Way’s (MW) inner stellar halo contains an [Fe/H]-rich component with highly eccentric orbits, often referred to as the
‘last major merger.’ Hypotheses for the origin of this component include Gaia-Sausage/Enceladus (GSE), where the progenitor
collided with the MW proto-disc 8–11 Gyr ago, and the Virgo Radial Merger (VRM), where the progenitor collided with the
MW disc within the last 3 Gyr. These two scenarios make different predictions about observable structure in local phase space,
because the morphology of debris depends on how long it has had to phase mix. The recently identified phase-space folds in Gaia
DR3 have positive caustic velocities, making them fundamentally different than the phase-mixed chevrons found in simulations
at late times. Roughly 20 per cent of the stars in the prograde local stellar halo are associated with the observed caustics. Based
on a simple phase-mixing model, the observed number of caustics are consistent with a merger that occurred 1–2 Gyr ago.
We also compare the observed phase-space distribution to FIRE-2 Latte simulations of GSE-like mergers, using a quantitative
measurement of phase mixing (2D causticality). The observed local phase-space distribution best matches the simulated data
1–2 Gyr after collision, and certainly not later than 3 Gyr. This is further evidence that the progenitor of the ‘last major merger’
did not collide with the MW proto-disc at early times, as is thought for the GSE, but instead collided with the MW disc within
the last few Gyr, consistent with the body of work surrounding the VRM.
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt – 24th
December 2020
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
- Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Of Its Days Period
(Jupiter day =9.9 hours, i.e. Jupiter has a cycle each 79.2 hours)
The hypothesis explanation
- Jupiter has a cycle during 79.2 hours = 8 of Jupiter days
- This cycle is created by Jupiter motion but effects also on Saturn and Neptune
motions
Paper Objective:
- The paper tries to prove this fact
Paper Contents:
1- Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days
2- The Moon Orbital Triangle Discussion
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
1- Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days
1-1 Jupiter Cycle (8 days) Creation 1-2 Jupiter Cycle (8 days) Discussion
1-3 Jupiter Cycle (8 days) Role
1-4 Planet Velocity And Diameter Dependency
1-1 Jupiter Cycle (8 days) Creation
- Jupiter moves during its day period (9.9 hours) distance = 466884 km
- Jupiter Circumference = 449197 km
- The Difference = 17687 km
o During 8 days of Jupiter days (8 x 9.9 hours =79.2 hours), Jupiter moves a
distance = 3735072 km = 8 Jupiter Circumferences + 1 Jupiter Diameter
- Because of (1 Jupiter Diameter) We have concluded that, (8 of Jupiter days)
creates a cycle for Jupiter motion because the produced distance (3735072 km)
creates a defined a defined distance (NO ERROR) i.e.
- Jupiter motion mentioned to pass a distance during (8 of Jupiter days) = 8 Jupiter
Circumferences + 1 Jupiter Diameter
- What do we try to do in this paper?
- We analyze this cycle (8 of Jupiter days) to know how this cycle is created and
Why?
- To make our objective clear as possible, we will analyze 2 lines of data which are
o Jupiter motion during its day period (9.9 h) moves a distance =466884 km
o Jupiter motion during 9.53 h moves a distance = 449197km
o Where ( 449197 km) = Jupiter Circumference
- I want to say that, there are 2 geometrical machines by which these 2 values are
created because the difference between these 2 values (466884 km and 449197
km) creates a cycle for Jupiter done each (8 of Jupiter days), means we have
geometrical mechanism produced this cycle and this cycle is produced for some
geometrical reason …. So we try to see the behind complex interactions based on
which this cycle is created
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
1-2 Jupiter Cycle (8 days) Discussion
Part I
Equation no. (a)
π x (10921) s x 13.1 km /s (Jupiter Velocity)= 449197 km (Jupiter Circumference)
Equation no. (b)
7511 seconds x 4.7 km /sec (Pluto Velocity) = 35289 km = 3600 x 9.8
Where
10921 km = The Earth Moon Circumference 13.1 km/s = Jupiter Velocity
7511 km = Pluto Circumference 4.7 km/s = Pluto Velocity
- Equation no. (a) tells us how Jupiter pass a distance = Jupiter circumference, it's a
simple equation, where Jupiter during (10921 seconds) moves a distance = 142984
km = Jupiter diameter and based on that during (π x 10921 seconds) will move a
distance = Jupiter Circumference, i.e. Jupiter uses the Earth Moon Circumference
(10921 km) as a period of time (10921 seconds) and during this period of time
Jupiter moves a distance = its diameter
- We don't try to explain the data now until the data be completed
- Equation no. (b) tells that, Pluto moves during a period (7511 seconds) a distance
= 35289 km where 7511 km = Pluto Circumference
- If we use the distance 35289km as a period of time 35289 seconds = 9.8 hours But
Jupiter day =9.9 hours and the difference =1%
o The previous 2 equations try to investigate how Jupiter Cycle (8 of Jupiter
days) is created, because we have 2 values are defined by 2 different
branches both are used by Jupiter to produce its cycle (8 of Jupiter days)
o To make the discussion as clear s possible , we need to us how the 2 values
(π x 10921 seconds) and (7511 seconds) are used because based on these 2
values Jupiter motion during its day period is different with Jupiter
circumference with 4% and this difference creates a Jupiter diameter during
8 of Jupiter days which causes the cycle
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
First the value 34309 seconds = (π x 10921 seconds)
Equation no. (c)
51118 km = 6.8 km /s x 7511 seconds = 4.7 km/s x 10921 seconds
Where
6.8 km /s Uranus Velocity 51118 km = Uranus Diameter
4.7 km/s Pluto Velocity
- Uranus moves during (7511 seconds) a distance = 51118 km = Uranus diameter
- Pluto moves during (10921 seconds) a distance = 51118 km = Uranus diameter
- Equation no. (c) tells, there's a deep consistency between the moon circumference
(10921 km) and Pluto Circumference (7511 km) to be used as periods of time on a
side and Uranus & Pluto Velocities on the other side, all equations are controlled
by Uranus diameter!
- I want to say that
o To create Jupiter cycle (8 of Jupiter days), there are 2 branches of data are
used, (1st
Branch) uses the period (π x 10921 seconds) and (2nd
branch)
uses the period 7511 seconds, both values (10921 and 7511) are created in
consistency with each other because of Uranus effect but the branches are
extending through the solar system… means … the solar planets are divided
into 2 teams, one team uses (10921 seconds) and the other team uses (7511
seconds) and by that (Jupiter Cycle of its 8 days) express a general cycle in
the solar system motion… we analyze the data to see what planets belong to
what team and by what mechanism and why
o In this point (First) we deal with the period (π x 10921 seconds) and we try
to know what planets move by this period
(1)
- We know that, Jupiter moves during (π x 10921 seconds) a distance = 449197 km
= Jupiter Circumference
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
(2)
- The Earth moon moves during (π x 10921 seconds) a distance = 943817 km the
perimeter of the moon orbital triangle (ACE) (Error 1%)
o (Please Review The Moon Orbital Triangle Data)
o Notice (1) , The moon orbital triangle (ACE) whose perimeter = 943817 km
its base (EA) = 449197 km = Jupiter Circumference
o Notice (2), the equation, 13.1 km/s x 10921 s =142984 km, tells that Jupiter
moves during (10921 seconds) a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter,
means, the moon circumference (10921 km) which is used here as a period
of time should be created by a direct effect of Jupiter motion! So, how to
find this consistency between (10921 seconds ) and (7511 seconds)? For
better understanding, we may consider Pluto data (7511 km or seconds) is
created based on Uranus effect but the moon data (10921 km or seconds) is
a point of connection between Pluto and Jupiter, but Pluto is effected by
Uranus and that means, the moon is a connection point between Uranus
(through Pluto) and Jupiter and by that the moon belongs to Jupiter and
Uranus in the same time…
- Let's ask the question clearly as possible, what planet uses (π x 10921 seconds)
in its motion?!
o Jupiter moves during (π x 10921 sec) a distance = Jupiter Circumference
o Pluto move during (π x 10921 sec) a distance = Uranus Circumference
o The moon moves during (π x 10921 sec.) a distance = The Perimeter (ACE)
(Error 1%)
o Venus moves during (10921 sec.) a distance = Saturn Circumference
(Error 1%)
o Earth moves during (10921 sec.) a distance =2 Uranus Circumferences
(Error 1.3%)
- The data tells there are 5 planets use the value (10921 seconds) in their motions.
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
- But
- Can the value (π x 10921 km) be produced by planet motion? by what planet?!
o 6.8 km/s x 5040 seconds = (π x 10921 km), the equation tells, Uranus
moves during (5040 seconds) a distance = (π x 10921 km)
o We remember that, Mercury Day needs (5040 sec.) to be 176 solar days
o 5.4 km/s x 6378 seconds = (π x 10921 km), the equation tells, Neptune
(whose velocity 5.4 km/sec) moves during (6378 seconds) a distance = (π x
10921 km)
o We know that, Earth radius = 6378 km
- We notice that, planet diameter and circumference is used easily as period of time,
spite the geometrical mechanism by such using is absent we can't refuse it because
it's found frequently
- The previous 2 equations are distinguish because Uranus equation uses a period of
time (5040 seconds) as a period of time but Neptune equation uses Earth radius as
a period of time, so the near equation to our geometry book is Uranus equation
- That tells, the moon circumference may be defined by Uranus basically
- But
o 29.8 km/s x 365.25 seconds = 10921 km, the equation tells that during
365.25 seconds Earth (whose velocity 29.8 km/sec) moves a distance =
10921 km = the moon circumference
- But
o 35 km/s x 311 seconds = 10921 km, the equation tells that Venus (whose
velocity 35 km/sec) moves during (311 seconds) a distance = 10921 km
And
o 24.1 km/s x 311 seconds = 7511 km, the equation tells that Mars (whose
velocity 24.1 km/sec) moves during (311 seconds) a distance = 7511 km
o I wish the deep interactions are seen in the data, we simply move inside a
network of interactions between different data… the dependency between
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
10921 and 7511 are so deep which push us to conclude that these 2 values
(10921 and 7511) are created for geometrical necessities and they together
create an effect greater than our consideration for both planets effects.
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
Second The Value 7511 Seconds = (Pluto Circumference 7511 km)
- Pluto motion causes even more puzzled data, so let's move step by step
o 7511 seconds x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) = 35302 km
o But
o 35302 seconds = 3600 x 9.8 hours (Jupiter Day =9.9 hours) (error 1%)
- Let's ask the question clearly as possible, what planets use the value 7511 seconds?
o 6.8 km/sec x 7511 seconds=51118 km, the equation tells, Uranus (whose
velocity 6.8 km/s) moves during 7511 seconds a distance = 51118 km=
Uranus diameter
o 5.4 km/sec x 7511 seconds=40080 km, the equation tells, Neptune (whose
velocity 5.4 km/s) moves during 7511 seconds a distance = 40080 km=
Earth Circumference (error 1%)
Please Note
o The value (π x 10921 km) is produced by motions of 2 planets only which
are (Uranus 6.8 km/s x 5040 seconds = (π x 10921 km)), and (Neptune 5.4
km/s x 6378 seconds = (π x 10921 km))
o So, Uranus and Neptune motions during 2 different periods produced ((π x
10921 km) and used the period (7511 seconds) to produce 2 different
distances
o Even if the geometrical mechanism is absent but we have 2 specific players
to effect on the 2 values we search for (π x 10921 km) and (7511 km)
o That tells the consistency between these 2 values has a geometrical reason
behind
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
Let's summarize what we have till now in following:
- Jupiter has a cycle of (8 days of Jupiter days period)
- To create this cycle …..
o Jupiter moves during its day period a distance greater than Jupiter
circumference with 4%
o During 8 of Jupiter days period
o Jupiter moves a distance = 8 Jupiter circumferences + 1 Jupiter diameter
o Because the additional distance (4%) creates a distance = Jupiter diameter in
8 days of Jupiter days, that tells us, Jupiter has a cycle of 8 days
- We analyzed the data to know how this cycle is created, and found that,
o Pluto Circumference (7511 km) is used as a period of time for Pluto velocity
(4.7 km/sec) to produce a distance 35302 km but 35302 seconds = 9.8 hours
which has a difference 1% with Jupiter day period ….And
o The Earth moon circumference 10921 km, if be used as a period of time
10921 seconds, so during (π x 10921 seconds) Jupiter (whose velocity 13.1
km/s) moves a distance = 449197 km = Jupiter Circumference
So
o The cycle 2 data branches are (7511 and 10921) and these 2 branches cause
the cycle to be created
And
o We analyzed the data to see what planets follow what branch and we have
found that, Uranus and Neptune motions effect on both branches (10921 and
7511) by different methods which may cause to create the consistency in
both branches effect on the planets motions
o And we have concluded that, Pluto is created by Uranus effect and the moon
is the connection point between Uranus and Jupiter motions interaction.
That creates the consistency between the moon and Pluto where Neptune
effect is almost seen through Jupiter effect.
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
1-3 Jupiter Cycle (8 days) Role
I-Data
(d)
9.9 x 3600 x 13.1 km/sec x 8 = 10.7 x 3600 x 9.7 km /sec x 10 (error 1%)
(e)
10.7 x 3600 x 9.7 km/sec x 8 = 16.1 x 3600 x 5.4 km /sec x 10 (error 4.5 %)
II-Discussion
Equation (d)
9.9 x 3600 x 13.1 km/sec x 8 = 10.7 x 3600 x 9.7 km /sec x 10 (error 1%)
- Equation no. (d) tells us why Jupiter has a cycle in 8 days…. Let's summarize the
idea in following
o Jupiter moves during 8 of its days (8 x 9.9 hours x3600 = 285120 seconds) a
distance = 3735072 km
o This same distance is passed by Saturn during (10) of Saturn days period (10
x 10.7 hours x 3600 = 385200 seconds), during this period Saturn moves a
distance = 3735072 km
o That means,
o Jupiter motion distance in 8 its days = Saturn motion distance in its 10 days
o But
o 3735072 km doesn't = 10 x Saturn Circumference
o Where
o 10 x Saturn Circumference = 3786750 km
o The difference 3786750 km - 3735072 km =51118 km =Uranus Diameter
So
- In 8 of Jupiter days, Jupiter moves a distance = 8 Jupiter circumferences +1 Jupiter
diameter, and this same distance of Jupiter motion = Saturn motion during 10 of its
days and Saturn motion distance = 10 Saturn circumferences +1 Uranus diameter
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
- The cycle is seen clearly, it's a quantum of energy and because of that it creates a
cycle in Jupiter motion and a cycle in Saturn motion and these cycles are defined
by the planets diameters (Jupiter and Uranus)
- Let's remember here equation no (a and c)
o (a) 13.1 km x 10921 seconds = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
o (c) 6.8 km x 7511 seconds = 51118 km = Uranus diameter
o These 2 equations are specific 2 equations and no other equations are similar
because the planet uses its velocity to move a distance = its diameter
i.e.
o Jupiter during (10921 s) moves a distance = Jupiter Diameter
And
o Uranus during (7511 s) moves a distance = Uranus Diameter
o The complex interaction should be seen in more light with the equation no.
(c)
o (c) 6.8 km x 7511 seconds = 51118 km = 4.7 km/s x 10921 s
o By this equation, a harmony is created between Jupiter and Uranus motions
based on the deep interaction between Pluto and the moon data
Here
o Uranus diameter (51118 km) is a real player in this interaction and has a
great effect on the solar system motion…
Let's move to the next equation
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
Equation (e)
10.7 x 3600 x 9.7 km/sec x 8 = 16.1 x 3600 x 5.4 km /sec x 10 (error 4.5 %)
- This equation uses the same concept which is used in the previous one (no. d)
- I suppose that, Saturn motion distance during 8 of its days = Neptune Motion
distance during 10 days, so I built this equation based on this same concept but it
has an error 4.5%!
- Because
- Neptune moves during 10 of its days period a distance = 3129840 km
- Saturn motion distance during 8 of its days = 2989152 km
- The difference around 142984 km (Jupiter Diameter) (error 1.6%)
- Neptune moves a distance during (10 of its days) greater than Saturn motion
distance during (8 of its days)…!
o This information causes a serious problem, because I suppose that, the
motion energy is transported from Jupiter to Saturn by a rate 80% for that
reason (8 of Jupiter days) of motion produces a distance = Saturn motion
distance during (10 of its days)
o By this same concept I suppose the motion energy is transported from
Saturn to Neptune! Here 2 questions are created
(1st
) why Saturn doesn't transport its motion energy to Uranus at first?
(2n
) how Neptune motion distance can be greater than Saturn if
Saturn is the source of energy of Neptune motion?!
- The questions answers need more analysis
- Any way the error in Neptune equation (no. e) doesn't disprove the idea but Uranus
data completely disproves it, Uranus motion during 10 of its days completely
different from Saturn motion distance during 8 days and that tells the energy is
transported from Saturn to Neptune and by some trick Neptune could move a
distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter as additional distance to its defined by
Saturn motion energy.
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
Jupiter Cycle (8 days) General Discussion
- How to explain the previous data?
- The planets aren't separated rigid bodies revolve around the sun independently
from each other
- The data shows that this description is incorrect, instead:
o The solar system is consisted of one trajectory of energy
o This trajectory has 2 ends (or poles) and these poles are Jupiter and Uranus
o The solar system is similar to a piece of textile it's made by 2 threads used to
weave this piece of textile one thread is perpendicular on the other, the first
one is Jupiter and the second is Uranus
o The weaving between the 2 threads created the other planets as knots in this
same thread
o The weaving process is done based on geometrical rules
o So planets velocities are created depends on each other by geometrical rules
o The basic difficulty is the planet diameter or circumference using as a period
of time, such using is found widely in the solar system motions, let's explain
why…!
o 142984 km =13.1 km/s x 10921 seconds, in this equation, Jupiter is created
before the Earth moon, so Jupiter diameter is known and also Jupiter
velocity, what's not know is the moon circumference (10921 km), so Jupiter
creates a period of time (10921 second) based on its own data to create a
planet circumference by using 1 km for each 1 second! why? because the
born planet data will be in harmony with Jupiter motion data, it's a giving
birth process, the parent gives birth for a child who's born with data similar
to its parents, that will provide the general harmony of motion – but this
explanation doesn't solve the question by what geometrical mechanism the
planet velocity can use planet diameter or circumference as a period of time
because light velocity can do that but planet with love velocity can't?
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
o The previous data pushes us far from this concept inside the mechanism
details… We know that, Uranus effect on Pluto greatly, so Uranus and Pluto
can be considered as one team…. Then Uranus and Pluto team will meet
Jupiter on the Earth moon circumference… that makes the Earth moon is so
specific point of interaction between Jupiter and Uranus motions…
Notice
- Pluto Axial Tilt 122.5 degrees x 0.8 degrees (Uranus orbital inclination) =97.8 deg
o (97.8 degrees = Uranus Axial Tilt)
- We consider that, Uranus axial tilt (97.8 deg) is the most great force effected on
the inner planets and specifically on the moon orbit
- And this equation tells us that, Pluto and Uranus behave together as one team and
specifically the value (97.8 degrees) (Uranus axial tilt) can be used by Uranus data
or by Pluto data as the equation tells us
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
1-4 Planet Velocity And Diameter Dependency
I- Data
(1)
VelocityPlutokm/sec4.7
VelocityJupiterkm/sec13.1
DiameterUranuskm51118
DiameterJupiterkm142984
=
(2)
VelocitySaturnkm/sec9.7
VelocityJupiterkm/sec13.1
ceCircumfernVenuskm38026
DiameterUranuskm51118
=
(3)
VelocityUranuskm/sec6.8
VelocityJupiterkm/sec13.1
DiameterMarskm3475
DiameterMarskm6792
= (1.5%)
(4)
VelocityNeptunekm/sec5.4
VelocityJupiterkm/sec13.1
DiameterNeptunekm49528
DiameterSaturnkm120536
=
(5)
VelocityMoonThekm/sec27.7
VelocityVenuskm/sec35
VelocityNeptunekm/sec5.4
VelocityUranuskm/sec6.8
ceCircumfernEarthkm40080
DiameterUranuskm51118
==
(6) (Error 1.3%)
VelocityUranuskm/sec6.8
VelocityMarskm/sec24.1
ceCircumfernEarthkm40080
DiameterJupiterkm142984
=
(7)
VelocityEarthkm/sec29.8
VelocityVenuskm/sec35
DiameterSaturnkm120536
DiameterJupiterkm142984
=
(8)
VelocityUranuskm/sec6.8
VelocityMoonThekm/sec27.78
RadiusPlutokm1195
DiameterMercurykm4879
=
(9)
VelocityPlutokm/sec4.7
VelocityUranuskm/sec6.8
VelocityMarskm/sec24.1
VelocityVenuskm/sec35
DiameterPlutokm2390
DiameterMoonThekm3475
==
(10)
VelocitySaturnkm/sec9.7
VelocityMarskm/sec24.1
DiameterMercurykm4879
DiameterVenuskm12104
=
(11)
VelocityEarthkm/sec29.8
VelocityMercurykm/sec47.4
DiameterMarskm6792
ceCircumfernMoonThekm10921
= (1%)
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
II- Discussion
General Notices
- Planets diameters are created as function in the planets velocities (or vice versa,
Planets Velocities are created depending on their diameters)
- The outer planets velocities are created based on Jupiter Velocity as functions in
the planets diameters, that because of the motion transportation from Jupiter to
Saturn to Neptune….
- The inner planets velocities (Venus, The Moon and Mars) are created as functions
in Earth and Uranus diameters!
- Earth velocity is created with Venus Velocity as functions in Saturn and Jupiter
diameters
- Mercury velocity is created based on Earth velocity as function in the moon and
Mars diameters.
- The previous data tells that
- Planet velocity can't be created independent from other planets data and that
supports the one geometrical building description for the solar system, where the
solar system is one building and each planet is a part of this same building
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
2- The Moon Orbital Triangle Discussion
2-1 The Moon orbital triangle Data (Revision)
Figure No. (1) (my figure)
Let's Review The Moon Orbital Triangle Data
(1st
Point)
- The figure I brought from internet to use in the Explanation -
- We have supposed that the inner circle is Perigee orbit and
the outer circle is apogee orbit – and we have calculated the
tangent DB = 181843 km
- AB = 363686 km (= perigee radius approximately)
- Perigee radius r =0.363 mkm Apogee radius r =0.406 mkm
- Based on that, the triangle (ODB) is a specific Pythagoras
triangle (1, 2 and 51/2
)
- The triangle (ODB) angles are 26.564 deg. and 63.435 deg.
(2nd
Point) The Moon Orbital Triangle Data Correction
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
- EB = Perigee radius = 363000 km
- ED = Apogee radius = 406000 km
- EA= (Jupiter Circumference) =449197 km
- AC = (Saturn diameter) =121620 km (error 1%)
- ES = total solar eclipse radius = 373900 km (error 1%)
(EC = 373000 km = Earth moon distance at T. Solar eclipse, BUT point C is NOT
the moon position in T. solar eclipse, because the distance BC= 86000 km but the
distance between perigee point and total solar eclipse point = 11000 km)
- CX= =87521 km
- CS = = 86690 km
- CZ= (the moon daily displacement) =88000 km
- CF= 88526.8 km CD =96150.9 km CY= 97766 km
- BA = BC = 86000 km
- BS= (the moon Circumference) =10921 km
- BZ = 18586 km BF =21000 km
- BD = DA = 43000 km
- BY = = 46475 km
- SZ = 7665 km ZF= 2414 km
- DY = 3475 km BX= 16203 km
THE ANGLES
- The angle between the black and red lines (under E) = 1.1 degrees
- (E) = 13.33 degrees (C)= 121.67 degrees (A) = 45 degrees
- (ECB) = 76.67 degrees (BCA) = 45 degrees
- (BCS = 7.23 deg) (BCZ = 12.195 deg) (BCF = 13.72 deg) (BCD = 26.564 deg)
(ACD = 18.435 deg)
- (BSC = 82.7 deg) (BZC = 77.8 deg) (BFC = 76.82 deg) (BDC = 63.434 deg)
- (CSA =97.23 deg) (CZA =102.195 deg) (CFA= 103.7 deg) (CDA = 116.564 deg)
- (CYA = 118.3 deg)
- BCY = 28.39 degrees ECZ= 88.9 degrees
- XCE = 66 degrees
- CZS = 77.8 degrees
- CZF =102.195 degrees
- XCB = 10.67deg
- (Uranus Axial Tilt = 97.8 degrees = FSC 97.2 degrees + 0.6 degrees) (i.e. the
angle under FSC)
- Angle under (E) = 13.33 degrees 1.1 degrees = 14.43 degrees
- Ecliptic Line creates 0.5 degrees with the moon orbital triangle base (EA)
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
2-2 The Moon Orbital Triangle Details Discussion
- How to draw The Moon Orbital Triangle….?
- The first horizontal black thick line which is under all triangle details and has zero
angle with the horizontal level this black line is the Moon Axial Tilt (6.7 degrees)
- The triangle base (red) thick line declines on the horizontal level (the black line)
with an angle =1.1 degrees
- Point E represents the Earth
- Point B represents Perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm)
- Point D represents Apogee radius (r=0.406 mkm)
- Point A represents a point in space far from Apogee radius with 43000 km at the
same horizontal level, means no angle between these points (E,B,D,A)
- The Ecliptic Line which is seen in the triangle has an angle = 0.5 degrees between
it and the moon orbital triangle base (The red line), why?!
- Because 1.6 degrees is found between the Earth Ecliptic & The Moon Axial Tilt
- The moon orbital motion is ranged between the point (B) (Perigee radius r=0.363
mkm) and the point D (Apogee radius =0.406 mkm).
- We will discuss the triangle details in full analysis one after one – but – at first
- Our basic discussion triangle is the triangle BCD because it contains the moon
orbital motion from perigee (Point B) to apogee (Point D)
- Please Note, the triangle (BCD) is a similar to the general triangle we have
discussed in the small figure separately (the triangle DOB) where the dimensions
are rated (406000km , 363000 mkm and 181843 km) and (96151 km, 86000km
and 43000km), because of that the angles are equal, which makes both triangles
are similar, both are typical to Pythagoras triangle (1,2, (5)1/2
)
- Our consideration now should be directed to the line BC =86000 km, this is the
value which we have found in the moon motion 4 points definition and we have
asked why all points use this dimension (86000 km) which is not found in the
moon orbital motion data, let's consider it in following
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
The Dimension 86000 km
- The moon orbital triangle is a vertical triangle, the line BC is perpendicular on
the base EA (=449197 km)
- By that
- While the moon motion is done from perigee (B) to apogee (D) on (x-y plain) the
line BC is found on (z-axis) perpendicular on the base EA.
- Based on that,
- The line CE =373000 km = The Total Solar Eclipse Radius …… BUT
- The line CE Is NOT the Total Solar Eclipse Radius Because
- The line CE is found vertical level (z=axis) while the moon moves on (x-y plain)
- Shortly
- The moon orbital triangle is a Pythagoras triangle found on the vertical level
(z=axis) and this triangle defines the moon orbital motion points using Pythagoras
rule….
- The dimension 86000 km is found on the vertical level (z-axis)…
- What does that tell us?
- The distance EC =373000 km has an angle =13.33 degrees with the horizontal
base (EA) because the point (C) is on the vertical axis (BC) (z-axis) but when this
angle 13.33 deg be not found, the distance EC =373000 km on the horizontal level
will = the total solar eclipse radius..
Means
- The moon orbital triangle (Pythagoras triangle) defines the moon orbital motion
points vertically but the moon uses the (vertical) definition by its horizontal motion
and by that, the points definition which is done by the vertical triangle is used by
the moon horizontal motion
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
The Point (A)
- The moon orbital triangle geometrical structure depends on 3 points (E, C and A),
E is Earth (by its gravity the moon revolves around it) and C is a vertical point
found by geometrical necessity. Because the moon orbital triangle (Pythagoras
triangle) is a vertical triangle on the base (EA), because of that the point (C) is
found on (Z-axis) by geometrical necessities and form one of the triangle basic
points. BUT
- What's the point (A)? how this point can be created and can effect on the moon
orbital triangle and motion?! Where this point is far from apogee radius with
43000 km and the moon can't move beyond the apogee radius, and can never reach
to this point (A). So how this point is found and why it has an effect on the moon
orbital triangle and motion?! So this point (A) raises an essential question in the
moon orbital triangle geometrical structure analysis.
But
- Geometrically the point (A) is one pillar of the moon orbital triangle pillars,
means, the geometrical structure forces us to accept the massive importance of the
point (A) and we have to find the reason by which this point (A) is created here
and causes such massive effect on the moon orbital triangle and motion.
The Ecliptic Line
- The ecliptic line is seen in the figure creates an angle = 0.5 degrees with the
triangle base (red line), because the moon axial tilt declines on the Earth ecliptic
with (1.6 degrees).
- Please Note, This angle (0.5 degrees), If its right triangle hypotenuse =396800
km, so its dimension will be =3475 km (the moon diameter), but if its right triangle
hypotenuse =1.392 mkm (lunar umbra length), so its dimension will be =12104 km
(Venus diameter).
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
2nd
Force Effects On The Moon Orbital Motion
- We have discussed the Point (A) before
- I suggest that, there's another force effects on the moon orbital motion and this
point (A) is a proof for this second force existence
- There's one more reason to suppose this (2nd
) force …. Because, the moon motion
needs 2 displacements (2 x 88000 km) to cover the distance (0.17 mkm), but the
moon moves one displacement seen by us through its orbit, where's the other
displacement be passed?
- That creates 2 reasons support the same conclusion that, there's one more force
effect on the moon orbital motion…
- This 2nd
force I claim, is found by interaction between the sun and Jupiter masses
gravities effect on the moon motion, because the sun gravity effect on the moon is
greater than Earth gravity effect on the moon, and Jupiter effect here creates an
interaction with the sun gravity to create specific effect on the moon motion..
Shortly.. 2 points of gravities total are created, Earth and its moon (these are the 2
points) and these 2 points are effected by (The sun & Jupiter) gravities interactive
effect, by that, another force is created and be effective on the point (A) found on
43000 km from apogee radius (0.406 mkm).
Please remember
- 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance) = 1047 x 142984 km (Jupiter diameter),
this equation shows that (the sun /Jupiter) masses rate effects on the Earth orbital
distance definition and that tells Jupiter effects on Earth orbital distance, and by
this same effect Jupiter effects on the moon orbital motion and that causes the
distance (EA) to be = 449197 km = Jupiter Circumference
1047 = (The Sun Mass /Jupiter Mass)
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
23
2nd
Orbit Is Found For The Moon Motion
- The moon needs to move one more displacement =88000 km, to cover the
distance 0.17 mkm.
- The moon moves its first displacement (88000 km) through its orbit around Earth,
but where the moon moves the second displacement?
- There must be 2nd
orbit for the moon motion, but where this orbit?
- We know that, the lunar eclipse umbra length = 1.392 mkm = the sun diameter
- And
- The distance EA = 449197 km = Jupiter diameter
- The distance from the point (A) to the end of the lunar umbra length = 942803 km
- But
- The Triangle EAC Perimeter = 942803 km
- That tells us, the point (A) separates between 2 equal values (2 equal distances)
- The first value is the triangle EAC perimeter and the second value is the distance
from the point (A) to the end of lunar umbra length…
- That tells us, the moon 2nd
orbit is a neighbor one to the first orbit, simply the point
(A) separates between the moon 2 orbits…
- But how to understand that?
- Can the moon be out of apogee radius (0.406 mkm)?! Because Earth gravity
prevents the moon to move out of apogee radius… but
- The 2nd
orbit position is defined clearly by the previous data analysis, and we have
to accept that this definition is a correct one and there's one more orbit found
beyond the point (A), even if the moon can't move through this orbit
- So we have some dilemma here because the data tells a second orbit must be found
for the moon motion but there's no way to use this second orbit by the moon
because the moon is a prisoner behind the apogee radius (r=0.406 mkm)
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
24
- How to solve this dilemma?
- The power which is provided by the moon orbital triangle is the geometrical rules,
the triangle shows that the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules
perfectly an by that, the geometrical structure shows many data about this motion
- So, what advantage can be provided by the Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure?
- Let's imagine a simple description in following
o Imagine a car connected by a chain of steel with another car both are the
same type and manufacturer and production date, simply 2 typical cars
o One moves by its motor and the other doesn't
o Both cars are on 2 different tracks as 2 prisoners cars, no one can be out of
its track
o The only available motion is to forward… now the working car moves by its
motor and can pass the track but the other can't move …. But because the 2
cars are connected with chain of steel the working car pulls the other one
and both move equal distances through the 2 tracks… that perform 2
distances by one car motion.
o What do we need to perform this experiment?
o We need a suitable geometrical structure only…
o The moon doesn't move beyond apogee radius (r=0.406 mkm) but the other
displacement (88000 km) is passed through the other orbit (behind the point
A) how? Because the moon orbital geometrical structure provides this
chance for the moon orbital motion and this is the basic positive result of the
complex geometrical structure of the moon orbital triangle
Shortly
o The second force which effects on the moon orbital motion, effects to create
a geometrical structure interactive with the moon orbital motion and create a
parallel displacement in the (2nd
orbit) as a result for the moon displacement
in its orbit around Earth and by that the moon moves both displacements and
creates the total distance (0.17 mkm) to cover the difference.
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
25
26. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
26
References
Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in-planet-motion
or
https://www.academia.edu/44286772/Light_Motion_Features_Are_Discovered_in_Planet_Motion
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (II)
https://www.academia.edu/44368860/The_Moon_Motion_Trajectory_Analysis_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-motion-trajectory-analysis-ii
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II)
https://www.academia.edu/44334645/Can_Different_Rates_Of_Time_Be_Found_In_The_Solar_System_Motion_II_
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous