A Research Presentation Summary.pdf

IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawdrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
A Research Presentation Summary
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –11th
June 2022
Abstract
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st
Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (No Planet moves by the sun
gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation and using to prove (Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from
One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
(Please scan the figure (ORCID)

I do this research
2nd
2
POINT NO. (1) (Planet Orbital Distance Equation)
My first equation d2
= 4d0 (d-d0)
where
d= planet orbital distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
The equation be used by 2 direct neighbor planets only
Example No. (1)
(108.2 million km)2
= 4 x 57.9 million km x 50.3 million km (error less 1%)
108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance
57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance
50.3 million km = Mercury Venus Distance
Example No. (2)
(1433 million km)2
= 4 x 778.6 million km x 655 million km (error less 1%)
1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance
778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance
655 million km = Saturn Jupiter Distance
The Equation discussion
(a)
The Equation tells each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor
planet orbital distance – but – there are 3 exceptions which are –
Earth depends on Mercury not Venus –
Mars depends on Venus not Earth–
Pluto depends on Uranus not Neptune–
(b)
The equation be used with all planets sufficiently with max error (1%) except with
Earth (error 3%) and Neptune (error 4%)
(c)
We don't use the forma (d= 2d0) because it creates great errors with all planets data
And

I do this research
2nd
3
The forma (d=2d0)2
causes max error (1%) with all ((Earth 3%) and (Neptune 4%)
But
The forma (d=2d0)3
causes NO Error at all
(d)
My equation shows – the distance from the sun to Pluto be distributed based on one
geometrical design – means – the distances be created together as one group in one a
network form – the distances be similar to the chess board distances- they are
distributed geometrically and in one network based on one design -
Shortly
No Single Distance be Created independently or individually – we deal with one
network of distances -
(e)
Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) – this concept is used in my third
equation (d1/d2) = (v2/v1)2
where d= Planet Orbital Distance and v = Planet Velocity
The equation tells – If we know a planet orbital distance, we can conclude its velocity
theoretically -
Shortly
By my first equation (d2
= 4d0 (d-d0)) and kepler laws we can conclude theoretically
without observation all planets orbital distances, periods and velocities by using one
data only which is (Mercury orbital Distance =57.9 million km)
That tells planet motion data (orbital distance, period and velocity) be created based
on geometrical rules and can be concluded theoretically without observation.
The Conclusion of Point No. (1)
The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Rules – and no
motion data be created by random process or initial conditions.

I do this research
2nd
4
POINT NO. (2) The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by the sun gravity)
Because
By One Force the planet be created and moving – means– One Force Does The 2 Jobs
(Creation and Motion) – Why?
Suppose a planet be created by any force and after creation the sun mass gravity
causes this planet to move – in this case – this planet will move against its internal
structure and it will be broken –
Shortly
One force caused the planet creation and motion
The sun didn't create any planet, Because of that No planet moves by the sun gravity
Based on this idea – we conclude –
Mercury Creation and Motion Data be in harmony because they be created by one
force – now let's ask
Can we have 9 forces in the solar system – one force for each planet??
Of Course NOT
We have only one force for the 9 planets and their moons – all planets be created and
moving by One Force only –
The Conclusion of Point No. (2)
There's One Force Caused all planets Creations and Motions –
That necessitates to find One Geometrical Design Behind the Solar System
By this one design (the one force) can cause all planets creations and motions.
Notice
Planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor orbital distance (my 1st
equation
proves that) and planet velocity depends on its orbital distance (by Kepler laws)
As a result, the concept (Planet Motion Depends On Its Mass) lost its 2 components
and the concept has no any proof.
The gravitation equation is wrong because it can't define any planet orbital distance

I do this research
2nd
5
But
The physicists claim – The planets order contradict the gravitation equation – because
of their initial conditions
But
We have proved now that – Planets Motions Data be Created based on Geometrical
rules and no initial conditions effect on them –
And my 1st
equation defines each planet orbital distance clearly and no initial
condition be discovered.
Means,
The initial condition is a fake idea and the gravitation equation is a wrong one.

I do this research
2nd
6
POINT NO. (3) The Research Method Explanation And Using
- The research method is (Planet Data Analysis)
- This method puts planets data in comparison with the theory tries to explain these
planets motions – by that – the planets data be used as a reference for the theory –
means- the theory explains a planet motion has to explain how this planet data be
created (Planet data means, planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, …..etc)
- How does this method work? (by 3 steps)
- The method needs (interesting data) and (a hypothesis explains this data) and
(more data proves the hypothesis)
- Let's use 2 examples to explain how this method works
- Example No. (A) (Mars Migration Theory)
- We need interesting data
- The 3 planets (Mercury – Venus – Earth) are order in their diameters, masses and
orbital distances – this is interesting data-
- What hypothesis can we create?
- (Mars Original Position Was Between Mercury And Venus)
- If this is the original position of Mars the planets order will be
- (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth)
- The 4 planets be in order for their diameters, masses and orbital distances
- Can we prove this hypothesis? Yes
- Mars had migrated from its original orbital distance to its current one – and Mars
in its migration motion had collided with Venus and then with Earth and Mars
itself caused to create the Earth Moon!
- Giant-Impact hypothesis tells, a planet in Mars Size had collided with the Earth
and caused the moon creation.
- Can Mars Itself do that? the theory tells No Hope
- But, our data analysis shows (Mars had migrated from its original position)
- Let's move with this hypothesis for a while

I do this research
2nd
7
- Suppose Mars was the second planet after Mercury and had migrated to its current
point (227.9 million km) and Mars had collided with Venus and then with Earth –
can this idea help Giant-impact hypothesis? for example can this idea answer
(Why Does Venus Have No Moon?) let's try to answer
- (a)
- Imagine Mars was the second planet after Mercury and had migrated to its current
position (227.9 mkm), in its displacement, Mars was pushing by force and had
collided with Venus and pushed all debris with it in its motion direction - Venus
had found no debris around – for that Venus couldn't create its own moon-
- (b)
- Another question asks about (the origin of the lunar magma ocean!) Venus, The
Lunar Magma Ocean is came from Venus, it's a part of Venus found by the
collision between Mars and Venus but Mars had pushed all debris with it in its
motion direction and left Venus without debris
- Earth gravity is greater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their momentum
and by that the Earth could create its moon where the moon rocks are consisted of
Venus, Earth and Mars debris
- The fact Mars has 2 moons is one more proof for this idea, because Mars with
small mass could attract 2 moons and Venus couldn't.
- The rest debris be attracted by Jupiter and consisted the asteroid belt
- Example No. (B) (The Moon Orbital Motion Equation)
- (The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
- (1)
- First (we search for interesting data)
- The moon daily displacement =88000 km and during 29.53 solar days the
displacements total be = 2.598 million km = 2π x 413600 km
- This data is interesting – why
- Because

I do this research
2nd
8
- The data tells the moon orbital apogee radius should be 413600 km
- But, the moon orbital apogee radius in fact be =406000 km!
- And
- The data tells also,
- The moon daily displacement (88000 km) be so long, because of that, the moon
should be prisoner in the orbit with radius (=413600 km) and the moon can't
revolve around the Earth through any more near orbit!
- Not facts – the moon revolves around the Earth through more near orbits and can
reach to perigee radius (363000 km)
- How to explain this interesting data?? What hypothesis can we create?
- The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit
horizontal level by that the real displacement (L) through the orbit be less than
(88000 km) because it be (L = 88000 km cos θ) by that the real displacement be
shorter than (88000 km) and the total displacement be less than (2.598 million km)
and that makes the moon orbital apogee radius to be decreased from 413600 km to
406000 km.
- We should pay attention to the angle (θ), because this angle controls the moon
motion features – where- with the angle (θ) increasing the real displacement (L) be
shorter and the moon can revolve around the Earth through more near orbits – but
–with the angle (θ) deceasing the real displacement (L) be longer and that pushes
the moon far from the Earth to more far orbits.
- The moon orbital motion equation (my equation) depends on the angle (θ)
- (θ1 = θ0 +1.7 deg) where (θ1= the today angle and θ0=the yesterday angle) the
equation defines the moon position (today) based on its position (yesterday) – the
equation is tested in my paper-
- In fact, the idea of the angle (θ) solves many basic problems in the moon orbital
motion explanation – we can discover this idea only by using planets data analysis
method–

I do this research
2nd
9
- Notice–
- The Moon Orbital Perigee Radius = 363000 km
- The Total Solar Eclipse Radius = 373000 km
- The Moon Orbital Distance = 384000 km
- The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km
- But
- (363000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (373000 km)2
- (373000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (384000 km)2
- (384000 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (393500 km)2
- (393500 km)2
+ (86000 km)2
= (406000 km)2
(error 1%)
The data simply tells, the moon 4 basic orbital radiuses be created depending on one
another by using Pythagorean rule because of the moon using of the angle (θ) in its
motion. this data should be considered one more proof for the idea (The moon using
of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
In fact
This data provides some discovery in the moon orbital motion explanation – and
almost no one knew before that the moon orbital apogee radius should be =413600
km and be decreased by some intelligent technique to be 406000 km –
This whole point of discussion in the moon orbital motion was absent and unknown
because no one uses planet data analysis method in astrophysics research.

I do this research
2nd
10
POINT NO. (4) (The Solar System Original Energy)
The Research hypothesis
The planets matters and their distances be created of One Energy
Means
The planets matters be created of energy and their distances be created of energy, and
the hypothesis tells it's the same one energy from which all planets matters and their
distances be created
The hypothesis proves
4-1 Planet Motion Analysis
4-2 The Big bang theory Refutation
4-3 One Geometrical Design Be Found Behind The Solar System
4-4 There's a continuum in the solar system
4-5 The solar system distances be in a network form
4-6 My Fourth Equation (Planet Diameter Equation)
4-7 Planet diameter depends on its distance d = r (r + R)
4-8 Planet Diameter And Distance proportionality (d = r x 1092
)
The point question
If Planet motion data depends on geometrical rules, can this planet creation data
contradict these rules of motion data?
4-1 Planet Motion Analysis
We accepted that (One Force Caused The Planet Creation And Motion) and we have
agreed that (One Force Caused All Planets Creation And Motion) and also we have
agreed that (If One force causes all planets creation and motion – that necessitates to
have one geometrical design behind the solar system creation and motion)
This description of the solar system can be found only if it created of One Energy
Shortly – One Energy was found in a geometrical design from which the solar
planets matters and their distances be created

I do this research
2nd
11
Because – the energy was in a geometrical design – this geometrical design be found
behind the solar system creation and motion.
Means one law controls the solar planets creation and motion.
(As in the double production experiment – electron and positron be created from
gamma ray – one law controls the 2 particles creation and motion – as a result – the 2
particles charges total are zero because Gamma ray is zero charge)
One Geometrical Design (means)
Planet creation data isn't independent data but it's a part of a larger group of data – by
that the planets data be created together based on one law
The creatures male and female bodies can be used as example – the 2 creatures are
created by ONE LAW – they aren't independent creatures –
The double production experiment be another example
Similar to that,
The solar planets be created by One Law and based on One Geometrical Design –
because it be created from the same one energy.
This idea answers the point question –
If planet motion data depends on geometrical rules, can this planet creation data
contradicts these rules of motion data?
Of course not, it's impossible – if planet motion data be created based on geometrical
rules and exact equations – that necessitates this planet creation data to be created
based on geometrical rules and exact equations otherwise this planet will be broken.
Because there's a contradiction between its creation data and its motion data –
Means – this planet moves against its internal structure – as you force a human to
walk on his hands in place of his feet – the planet will be broken -
As a result we conclude– one geometrical design controls the solar system creation
and motion data.

I do this research
2nd
12
4-2 The Big bang theory is wrong
The big bang theory is wrong because it told us the original energy was in a chaos
form – as a result of the first explosion – that caused the physicists to believe that
(Planets data be created by random process, historical unknown factors and initial
conditions) – this is a wrong idea – the energy was in a geometrical design and by that
all planets data be created based on geometrical rules and exact equations (NO Chaos)
4-3 One Geometrical Design Be Found Behind The Solar System
(1) The Meaning Of "The One Geometrical Design"
(2) The Proof Of "The One Geometrical Design"
(3) The Reason of "The One Geometrical Design"
(4) The Result of "The One Geometrical Design"
Item No. (1) The Meaning Of (The One Geometrical Design)
(a)
One Law Controls All Planets Creation And Motion Data
(b)
The planets orbital and internal distances be created as One Group and in A Network
Form – My first equation proves this meaning (among many other proves)
d2
= 4 d0 (d- d0)
by that the distances be one network as chess board distances created as one group
Item No. (2) The Proof Of (The One Geometrical Design)
(i) (Planet Data Depends On 5 Equations)
My 5 equations prove that, planets creation and motion data depend on geometrical
rules – proving that – one geometrical design be found behind the solar system.
(ii) Planet Motion Analysis
One force should create the planet and cause its motion – we have discussed that –
and concluded that – the solar planets motions depend on one geometrical design

I do this research
2nd
13
(iii) There's A Continuum In The Solar System
We discuss it in a separated point
Item No. (3) The Reason Of (The One Geometrical Design)
The solar planets (matters) and their distances be created of one energy – this original
energy features can be summarized in following:
The Original Energy Features
- It's One Energy From Which The Planets Matters And Distances Be Created
- This energy was in A Geometrical Design and was controlled by geometrical
rules – my 5 equations prove this idea.
- Also planet motion analysis proves this idea (as we have discussed before)
- This energy has a continuum effect which be seen in wide range of planets data–
and can't be explained unless by a continuum in the original energy (discuss later)
- The big bang theory is wrong– because it supposed the original energy was in a
chaos form while it was in a geometrical design form- means- the first explosion
be described by the big bang theory if happened couldn't cause the original energy
to be in a chaos form -
- The solar system data uses the distances and periods values as equivalent one
another (this feature tells that the original energy was in a geometrical design
because it was an energy of One Light Beam – later we discuss that)
Item No. (4) The Result Of (The One Geometrical Design)
The Planets Motions Be Complementary One Another And By That – The Planets
Motions Be Integrated Into One Unified General Motion.
As a result – the planets move as gears in one machine of gears –
Shortly – the solar system moves as one creature motion and this motion be created
by all planets motions integration.
That makes the solar system to be similar to a machine of gears – or – a great
mechanical clock.

I do this research
2nd
14
4-4 There's A Continuum In The Solar System
The continuum effect proves (From One Energy The Planets Matters And Their
Distances Be Created)
The continuum is a force effected on a wide range of data – the data types be different
but the effect is the same! Let's see an example
Example / (the rate 1.0725)
This rate (1.0725) effects on a wide range of data in the solar system – the data be
different in types
(i) 40% Of All Distances In The Solar System Be Effected By This Rate 1.0725
(ii) 50% of Planets axial tilts also be rated by it
(iii) many cycle periods be rated also by it and many other data
Let's refer to some data in following
Jupiter Distances
778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance) = 1.0725 x 720.7 mkm (Jupiter Mercury distance)
720.7 mkm (Jupiter Mercury distance) = 1.0725 x 671 mkm (Jupiter Venus distance)
671 mkm (Jupiter Venus distance) = 1.0725 x 629 mkm (Jupiter Earth distance)
629 mkm (Jupiter Earth distance) = (1.0725)2
x 550 mkm (Jupiter Mars distance)
Planets Axial Tilts
(28.3/26.7) = (26.7/25.2) = (25.2/23.4) = (122.5/113.4) = ( 97.8 /91.3) = 1.0725
28.3 degrees = Neptune Axial Tilt 26.7 degrees = Saturn Axial Tilt
25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt 23.4 degrees = Earth Axial Tilt
113.4 degrees= 23.4 degrees +90 degrees
122.5 degrees= Pluto Axial Tilt 97.8 degrees = Uranus Axial Tilt
91.3 degrees = 90 degrees + 1.3 degrees (Jupiter Orbital Inclination)
The rate (1.0725) also be used between cycles periods for example
Cycles Periods
(29.53 days /27.3 days) = (224.7 days /243 days) =1.0725
29.5 days = the moon day period and 27.3 days = the moon orbital period

I do this research
2nd
15
224.7 days = Venus Orbital Period and 243 days = Venues Rotation Period
We can explain the continuum effect only by the hypothesis (from One Energy the
planets matters and distances be created) -Because
The continuum was in the original one energy, that explains how it effects so widely
on data.
4-5 The Solar System Distances Be In A Network Form
My first equation proves that the solar system distances be created in a network form
(d2
= 4d0 (d-d0) Means, the distances be created as one group in one network form,
that can support the idea (from one energy the planets and distance be created)

I do this research
2nd
16
4-6 My Fourth Equation (Planet Diameter Equation)
v1/v2= s/r= I
v1 = Planet Velocity v2 = Another Planet Velocity
r = Planet Diameter of one planet of the 2
s = The Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I = Planet Orbital Inclination
(v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet but v1 be belonged to another one)
Example No. (1) (Neptune Equation)
(89143 /49528) = (9.7 /5.4) =1.8
- Neptune Orbital Period (59800 days) has 89143 Neptune rotation periods (16.1 h)
- 49528 km = Neptune Diameter
- 9.7 km/s = Saturn Velocity
- 5.4 km/s = Neptune Velocity
- The data follows the rule perfectly – error less than 1%
- Also 9.7 /5.4 = 1.8 where 1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination
Example No. (2) (Mars Equation)
671/6792 = (4.7 /24.1 x 2) = 0.098 (error 1.3%)
- 6792 km = Mars Diameter
- 24.1 km/s = Mars Velocity
- 4.7 km/s = Pluto Velocity
- 671 = Mars Orbital Period (687 days) has 671 Mars rotation periods
Example No. (3) (Saturn Equation)
(24106 x2 /120536) = (9.7 /24.1) =2.5
- Saturn Orbital Period (10747 solar days) has 24106 Saturn rotation periods (10.7h)
- 120536 km = Saturn Diameter
- 24.1 km/s = Mars Velocity (2.5 degrees =Saturn orbital inclination)

I do this research
2nd
17
The Equation Discussion
- (1)
- The equation has modifications with each planet data – but these modifications are
so limited and can't destroy the equation main concept. Let's refer to these
modifications in following
- (a)
- Mars and Saturn use no. (2) in their data which isn't found in the original equation
– Jupiter also uses no. (6) in its data
- Earth uses no (5.6) in its data (almost as a result for the moon motion effect on
Earth data)
- Notice (5.6 deg = 5.1 deg the moon orbital inclination + 0.5 deg the moon
diameter angle)
- (b)
- Uranus data causes an error (5%)
- (c)
- Jupiter and Saturn data use (r/s) in place of (s/r) which be used by the equation
- (d)
- Just 3 planets data produce results (I) equal to planets orbital inclinations – the
other planets produced values need analysis
- (e)
- The equation be used from the Earth to Pluto because the moon orbital period =
the moon rotation period.
- These modifications can't cause to destroy the equation main concept.
- (2)
- There are difficulties to define the used units in the equation – Why??
- Because of
- (a) The Light Motion Effect
- (b) The Geometrical Interactions Effect

I do this research
2nd
18
- Let's explain that in following..
- The solar system is created of one light beam- the light beam creates the planets
matters and distances – by that – the planets data be created by light motion but we
see from the other side – for example –
- Light (300000 km/s) travels during a solar day (86400 s) a distance = 25920
million km but we see it as 25920 years (The Precession Cycle) – means- the
period 25920 years is created by light motion but we see from the other side.
- The geometrical interactions cause similar effects – for example -
- Mercury orbital circumference =360 million km and = 360 degrees that tells 1
degree = 1 million km
- I try to show that – it's a great machine depend on one light beam motion – by that
– the data be created by many geometrical effects -
- (3)
- The equation provides a new concept tells (Planet Diameter Depends On Its
Motion Data) –
- Let's remember the question – if planet motion data depends on geometrical rules
can this planet creation data contradict these rules? of course Not otherwise this
planet will be broken – but the concept is a new in astrophysics and a new in its
meaning – it tells – Planet diameter depends on its motion – and if planet velocity
be changed its diameter will be changed also!
- Let's use an example to explain this meaning
- Imagine water moves through a canal and in some point the water motion creates a
vortex – and – for some reason – the water has to loss its minerals and salts in this
vortex – later – the salts caused to create some rock in a tube form – through this
rock tube the water moves – and later the rock tube itself be released from its roots
and be moving with the water around the vortex while the water still moves
through the tube

I do this research
2nd
19
- The rock tube dimensions be in full harmony with the water motion
- Similar to this description, planet diameter be created depending on its motion
- (4)
- Why do Jupiter and Saturn use (r/s) in place of (s/r)?
- The solar system is one light beam – and in Saturn position there's some reflection
of energy – the data is reflected on Saturn both sides – that may explain why
Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance – because the reflection causes to
create equal energies and the distance is energy –
- Also 4900 million km = Jupiter orbital circumference and 4900 days be needed
from Uranus to move a distance = Uranus orbital distance
- This few data tries to show that the data be reflected on both 2 sides of Saturn
(later be discussed in more details)
- Notice
- The moon orbital period = the moon rotation period =27.3
- That causes the number (s) for the moon motion be equal =1 and that causes the
equation doesn't work with the moon data but starts from the Earth to Pluto –
- I want to say
- It's one light beam which started from the sun to Pluto – and that creates – one
geometrical design along the solar system – as a result
- The question (why the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period?) this
question has an answer but it's not a real one – (the tidal locking idea) can't be
sufficient answer this question because my fourth equation shows the moon cycles
equality be used as a base to create planets diameters as function in their motions
data – means- the moon cycles periods equality is a necessary to create my fourth
equation based on which the planets diameters be created
- The idea can be supported by 2 facts
- (a) (The Moon Day Period/ The Moon Orbital Period) = (Venus Rotation Period /
Venus Orbital Period)

I do this research
2nd
20
- This data tells, the moon cycles periods are supported by Venus Cycles periods
that means the base of equation isn't the moon motion but supported also by Venus
motion
- (b) The Earth Moon Distance At Apogee Point = 406000 km = The Planets
Diameters Total
- In fact the moon orbit be divided geometrically by some puzzled data because
-
- The moon orbital perigee radius =363000 km = the outer planets diameters total
(error 1%)
- The moon orbital apogee radius =406000 km = the planets diameters total
- And
- The distance between the perigee and apogee = 43000 km
- Through this distance the moon moves – but– the moon diameter = 3475 km –
means – the space without the moon diameter = 39525 km = the inner planets
diameters total = Earth Circumference (error 1%)
- That tells
- The distances between the Earth and the moon be distributed geometrically in
comparison with the planets diameters total and we have no explanation for this
interesting data except my fourth equation which caused to create the planets
diameters based on the moon cycles periods equality.
- Please note
- The solar system is one light beam – means- this data be created by one light beam
motion – while we attribute the data to the moon motion but the fact is that the
light motion is behind it and causes to create the data – we need to discover the
light motion rules to know how this data be created by light motion.

I do this research
2nd
21
4-7 Planet diameter depends on its orbital distance d = r (r + R)
d = The Planets Orbital Distances Total
r = The Inner Planets Diameters Total
R= The Outer Planets Diameters Total
Shortly
16030 million km = 40000 km x 0.406 million km
Where
16030 million km = The Planets Orbital Distances Total
40000 km = The Inner Planets Diameters Total
406000 km = The Solar Planets Diameters Total
The data tries to prove that, the planets diameters be created based on geometrical
rules - this proof is very important because – if the planets motion and creation data
depend on geometrical rules that can prove one energy and one geometrical design be
found behind the solar system
My fourth equation provides a good proof for this idea – but – I try to add more
proves in the same direction – because – it's the theory cornerstone
We notice that – the planets orbital distances be distributed based on one geometrical
design and in one group – as we have proved by my first equation (d2
= 4d0(d-d0)) and
by the continuum effect we have discussed –
That tells the planets diameters be created based on some geometrical distribution –
means – not only the diameters be created depending on geometrical rules but also the
rules control the distribution is one group and under one law
That may explain the frequent using of the distance (406000 km) which be used as
(the moon orbital apogee radius) and also as (the distance be passed by Pluto in a
solar day) – I try to show that we deal with one geometrical mechanism
(notice /40000 km = the Earth Circumference)

I do this research
2nd
22
4-8 Planet Diameter And Distance proportionality (d = r x 1092
)
d (Planet Orbital Distance) = r (Planet Diameter) x 1092
there are 3 planets follow this rule
57.9 million km (Mercury orbital distance) = 4879 km(Mercury diameter) x 1092
149.6 million km (Earth orbital distance) = 12756 km (Earth diameter) x 1092
1433 million km (Saturn orbital distance) = 120536 km (Earth diameter) x 1092
The data tells
This is the rule between planet orbital distance and its diameter but because of the
planets migration (Mars migration theory) this rule no longer be used
Notice
Pluto also had migrated with Mars (Pluto was the Mercury moon)
Shortly
The idea tells
Planet diameter be created as a function in its orbital distance – but this rule be
covered later because of the planets migration and its resulted changes
For example
7070 km x 1092
= 84 million km
Means,
When Mars was in its original orbital distance (84 million km) its diameter was 7070
km, but, after Mars Migration, its diameter be decreased by 4% (6792 km) as a result
for the collision with Venus and Earth

I do this research
2nd
23
POINT NO. (5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
And
POINT NO. (6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
These 2 points we have to discuss together
The hypothesis
- The Solar Planets Matters and their distances be created of one energy – this one
energy be provided by one light beam – this light beam travels by a velocity
1160000 km/s (1.16 million km per second) –
- This velocity be registered in the planets creation and motion data.
- (The hypothesis disproves the special theory of relativity hypothesis)
1-Preface
- The solar system is one light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s- this light beam
creates the planets matters and their distances from its energy – the planets matters
are created by this light beam energy –Matter Is Created Of Energy – But How?
- Matter is a geometrical point in the energy trajectory – imagine we have one rope
and we created knots on this rope by itself – now we have the rope with 9 knots –
the knots be similar to the planets and the robe be seen as space (it's a trajectory of
energy not necessary to be bright)
- Based on this vision the planets matters are geometrical points be created by light
(energy) trajectory motion and the planets motions depend on this light motion –
by that – the planets be similar to ship sail over a sea and the sea be similar to a
network of light motions.
- Light motion creates the data but we see it by different vision – for example – light
(300000 km/s) travels during a solar day (86400 s) a distance = 25920 million km
but we see this value as (25920 years = The Precession Cycle) - As a result the

I do this research
2nd
24
simple question (why the moon diameter be =3475 km)? can answer by some very
complex answer- Based on this vision
- The solar system one geometrical design be created by light motion effect –
because – it's one light beam – it creates one geometrical design – as in the double
production experiment – from Gamma ray an electron and a positron can be
created – by that – the 2 particles be controlled by one law – similar to that – one
light beam energy be the source of the solar planets creation and motion for that
reason the solar planets be created based on one geometrical design and controlled
by one law.
- Let's remember one example because it helps greatly our discussion
- Imagine water moves through a canal and in some point the water motion creates a
vortex – and – for some reason – the water has to loss its minerals and salts in this
vortex – later – the salts caused to create some rock in a tube form – through this
rock tube the water moves – and later the rock tube itself be released from its roots
and be moving with the water around the vortex while the water still moves
through the tube
- The rock tube dimensions be in full harmony with the water motion
- This is the most near picture for the light motion and matter creation and motion
depends on the light energy
- We should notice– the matter moves with light motion but uses different rate of
time in this motion – by that – one second of light motion can equal one hour of
planet motion as many following data will show this rate of time.
- We still have a difficulty in our analysis – because we don't know the rules be used
by light motion to create the matters and space – by that – the whole geometrical
process be done but we catch nothing because we don't know the rules
- For example – imagine you observe a person on a mountain left a rock to descend
from the mountain apex to the ground – but you know nothing about the potential
energy what will happen? You will not understand what he does and you can't

I do this research
2nd
25
explain why the rock be dropped from the mountain – the geometrical process is
far from you because you don't know the used rule
- We are in a similar position because we don't know the geometrical rules – we
can't catch what happens! Let's give one example to explain that
- Example no. (1)
- Pluto moves in its day period a distance = the moon displacements total during
29.53 days = Earth motion distance during its day period (error 1%) why?
- 3 planets move equal distances in their days periods (why?) and what's the result of
this equality? It’s a usual using in the solar system – all planets use this system
and move equal distances in different cycle periods – for example – Jupiter moves
in its day period a distance = Neptune motion distance in a solar day
- Why??
- We get nothing from this data– the geometrical process be done but we understand
nothing! Because the used rule is unknown
- Example no. (2)
- Light (300000 km/s) travels during 2094 seconds a distance =629 million km
- Where
- 2094 million km = Jupiter Uranus Distance
- 629 million km = Jupiter Earth Distance
- Again, this type of data is beyond our understanding – some great puzzle –
- The light stands on Jupiter and uses the distance from Jupiter to Uranus as a period
of time (2094 second) to travel to pass from Jupiter to the Earth (629 million km).
- No pure coincidence of numbers here it's usual using in the solar system
- Another example
- Light (300000 km/s) travels during 2723 s x 2 a distance =1622 million km
- 1622 million km = Uranus Neptune Distance
- 2723 million km = Uranus Earth Distance
- Shortly

I do this research
2nd
26
- Because the rules are unknown I put the data as clear as possible to prove that one
geometrical design be found behind the solar system and this geometrical design
depends on a light beam its velocity 1.16 million km/s.
- Notice
- (1.16/0.3) x 2π =24.3
- Where
- 1.16 million km /s = light supposed velocity
- 0.3 million km /s = light known velocity
- The value (24.3) refers to (24 hours) because the time is created here.
- The calculation refers to how the matter be created
- The creation process input was a light beam its velocity 1.16 million km/s
- The creation process output were (matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- That means,
- The light (1160000km/s) loss some of its energy in matter and space creation and
by that the rest of energy be seen in light known velocity (300000 km/s)
- This idea tells that Matter is created with space (and no space without matter)
- Now
- After the creation, the light (300000 km/s) is traveled and caused 2 results:
- (1)
- The output energy be (matter + space) less in value than the input energy because
the light 300000 km/s consumes some of this energy – by that – the energy in the
matter will be prisoner in it forever because it can't return again to its original form
as light beam
- The produced matter be movable in nature and moves with light motion
- (2)
- The matter moves in a circular or elliptical forms of trajectory because of the rate
(2π) we find in the calculation – that explains why all motions in the universe be in
circular and elliptical forms.

I do this research
2nd
27
The Proves
II-My 5th
Equation
- V1V2= 322
- This equation tells that
- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves during 6.8 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 47.4 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 2 x 4.7 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
- Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 2 x 35 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
- (error 2%)
- Earth (29.8 km/s) moves during 2 x 5.4 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 2 x 29.8 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
- Mars (24.1 km/s) moves during 13.1 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
- Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 24.1 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
- (Error 2%) (In fact Jupiter moves during 24.6 hours a distance 1.16 mkm)
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 9.7 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
- Saturn (9.7 km/s) moves during 35 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
(error 5%)
- The planets velocities be defined complementary one another based on the
distance 11600000 km (why?)
- Notice, Kepler stated that (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and that means the
distance 1.16 million km is a player also in planet orbital distance definition as its
velocity – the equation refers strongly to the value 1.16 million km

I do this research
2nd
28
III-The Rate (1.0725)
- Data
- (1)
- (1.0725)2
= 1.16
- (2)
- (778.6/720.7) = (720.7 /671) = (671/629) = (629/550.7)0.5
=1.0725
- (3)
- (28.3/26.7) = (26.7/25.2) = (25.2/23.4) = (122.5/113.4) = ( 97.8 /91.3) = 1.0725
Discussion
- The rate (1.0725) we have examined before frequently and used it as a proof for a
continuum existence in the solar system. and the data no. (2) and (3) we have seen
frequently – let's remember them here
- (778.6/720.7) = (720.7 /671) = (671/629) = (629/550.7)0.5
=1.0725
- Where
- 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance
- 720.7 million km = Jupiter Mercury Distance
- 671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance
- 550.7 million km = Jupiter Mars Distance
- And
- (28.3/26.7) = (26.7/25.2) = (25.2/23.4) = (122.5/113.4) = ( 97.8 /91.3) = 1.0725
- 28.3 degrees = Neptune Axial Tilt
- 26.7 degrees = Saturn Axial Tilt
- 25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt
- 23.4 degrees = Earth Axial Tilt
- 113.4 degrees= 23.4 degrees +90 degrees
- 122.5 degrees= Pluto Axial Tilt 97.8 degrees = Uranus Axial Tilt
- 91.3 degrees = 90 degrees + 1.3 degrees (Jupiter Orbital Inclination)
-

I do this research
2nd
29
- Shortly
- the rate (1.0725) which be used as a rate between 40% of all distances in the solar
system and 50% of planets axial tilts and be used also between planets cycles
periods and other different data – this wide-using rate depends on the rate (1.16).
- I try to show that – we have a defined player behind which is (1.16) and this player
produces different effects on the data and by that the data be in harmony with it
frequently
- I have more reasons to believe that this rate (1.16) refers to light beam velocity
1.16 million km per second – as I will prove –
- But in case the physicist refuses my proof – he has to explain why thousands of
data be created in proportionality with this rate.
IV- The Distances Creation
- Data
- (A)
- (778.6/671) =(720.7 /629) = (629/550.7) =(550 x 2 / 940) = 1.16 (Max error 1.5%)
- (B)
- (5906/5127) = (4900/4224) = (4331/3717) = (4900/5678) = 1.16
- (C)
- (2094/6939.75) = (629/2094)= 0.3
- Discussion
- Data No (A)
- The data tells, light uses the distances as periods of time to create more distances
in a harmony with the first. Jupiter distances can be used as a good example
- Light (1160000 km/s) travels during 671 seconds a distance = 778.6 million km
- Light (1160000 km/s) travels during 629 seconds a distance = 720.7 million km
- Light (1160000 km/s) travels during 940 seconds a distance = 2 x550 million km
- Where

I do this research
2nd
30
- 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance
- 720.7 million km = Jupiter Mercury Distance
- 671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance
- 550 million km = Jupiter Mars Distance
- 940 million km = Earth Orbital Circumference
- The data no. (A) shows the distances be created based on one another – that proves
the theory (Planets distances be created together in a network form)
- Data No (B)
- (5906/5127) = (4900/4224) = (4331/3717) = (5678/4900) = 1.16
- This data behaves perfectly as the previous one
- Light (1160000 km/s) travels during 5127 seconds a distance = 5906 million km
- Where
- 5906 million km = Pluto Orbital Distance
- 5127 million km = Jupiter Pluto Distance
- 4900 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference
- 4224 million km = 2 x 2094 million km Jupiter Uranus Distance
- 3717 million km = Jupiter Neptune Distance
- 5678 million km = Jupiter Mars Distance
- 4331 days = Jupiter Orbital Period
- I try to show that – this is the method by which the light creates the distances
because all distances be created by this same method – that causes the distances to
be created in a network form
- And
- Because we deal with light motion – the data has flexibility to be used in distance
or period forms – simply – it's a light motion feature

I do this research
2nd
31
- Please note, it's a frequent using for example – light (300000 km/s) travels during a
solar day (86400 seconds) a distance =25920 million km but we see this distance
as 25920 years (the precession cycle)
- So, it's light motion effect on data to use the produced values in distance or periods
forms –
- Data No. (C)
- (2094/6939.75) = (629/2094) = 0.3
- This data uses the light (300000 km/s) to create the distances by the same method
we have seen with the light (1160000 km/s) proves that it's a light motion behavior
- Light (300000 km/s) travels during 6939.75 s a distance 2094 million km
- Light (300000 km/s) travels during 2094 s a distance 629 million km
- Where
- This data may explain the process more clear – we have one light started from the
Earth to Jupiter to Uranus (or vice versa) – the light creates the 2 distances in its
motion – another data can support this meaning
- Light (300000 km/s) travels during 2723 seconds x 2 a distance 1620 million km
- Where
- 2723 million km = Uranus Earth Distance
- 1622 million km = Uranus Neptune Distance
- This data tells a similar meaning, the light beam started from the Earth to Uranus
and then to Neptune (or vice versa)
- (Notice- I prefer The Sun Light Motion Direction)

I do this research
2nd
32
V- The Basic Data
- In following I provide the basic data which proves the research hypothesis tells
o The Solar Planets Matters and their distances be created of one energy –
this one energy be provided by one light beam – this light beam travels
by a velocity 1160000 km/s (1.16 million km per second) –
o This velocity be registered in the planets creation and motion data.
o (The hypothesis disproves the special theory of relativity hypothesis)
- The basic data is consisted of 7 data they examine as possible the solar system
basic design – but
- Because – many rules are unknown – this data isn't so clear to prove the hypothesis
– for that reason – I depend on one argument which is
- The solar system data depends on 2 basic players which are
- 4900 million km (Jupiter Orbital Circumference) and
- 1.16 million km /sec (Light supposed velocity)
- On these 2 values the whole solar system depend and be created
- That means –
- In the following 7 data we observe the numbers (4900 and 1.16) to see how deep
these 2 numbers effect on the solar system one geometrical design- that also
proves that – the solar system basic data depend on one geometrical design we
don't deal with separated planets but with one light beam starts from the sun to
Pluto and in its motion the light beam created the planets matters and their
distances
- Notice
- We deal with light motion – that means – the distance 4900 million km can be
used as 4900 solar days
- The data is put together at first and then be analyzed in the discussion.

I do this research
2nd
33
(Data No. 1)
Light (1160000 km/s) travels during (86400 s) a distance =100733 million km
(100733 million km = The Solar Planets Orbital Circumferences Total)
(Data No. 2)
- (A)
- 100733 million km x 2 = 4900 million km x 41
- 100733 million km = π x 32200 million km
- 32200 million km = (37100 million km – 4900 million km)
- 41 = 2π ((37100 million km /4900 million km) -1)
- (B)
- 16330 seconds x light (300000 km/s) = 4900 million km
- 2 x 16330 seconds x light (1160000 km/s) = 37100 million km (error 2%)
- (C)
- 100733 million km = 2π x 16030 million km
- (between 4900 and 4810 the error 2%)
- Where
- 100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total
- 37100 million km = Pluto Orbital Circumference
- 41 degrees = The Planets Orbital Inclinations Total

I do this research
2nd
34
(Data No. 3)
- (I)
- (2 x 100733 /197393) = (1.16/1.1318) = (0.6/0.5875)
- (II)
- (1.16/0.6) = (47.4/24.1) = (13.1/6.8) = (35/17.9)
- Where
- 197393 days = The Planets Orbital Periods Total
- 1.16 million km /s = The Light Supposed Velocity
- 0.6 million km = Light (300000 km/s) moves for 2 seconds
- 1.1318 million km = Jupiter Motion Distance Per Solar Day
- 0.5875 million km = Uranus Motion Distance Per Solar Day
(Data No. 4)
- (4900/3600) = (47.4/35) = (13.1/9.7) = (1.16)2
- Where
- 3600 second = an hour
- 47.4 km/s = Mercury Velocity
- 35 km/s = Venus Velocity
- 13.1 km/s = Jupiter Velocity
(Data No. 5)
- 3600 seconds x light (300000 km/s) = 2 x 550.7 million km (error 2%)
- 3600 seconds x light (1160000 km/s) = 2 x 2094 million km
- And
- 2094 seconds x light (1160000 km/s) x 2 = 4860 million km

I do this research
2nd
35
- Where
- 550.7 million km = Jupiter Mars Distance
- 4860 million km = Jupiter Orbital circumference (4900 million km error 1%)
(Data No. 6)
- (i)
- Light (300000 km/s) x 4900 seconds = 1461 million km
- (ii)
- 25920 million km = 1461 days x 17.75 million km /day
- (iii)
- Where
- 17.75 million km = The planets motions distances total during a solar day
(including the moon motion distance)
- (17.75 =4.095+3.024+ 2.57+ 2.57 +2.082+ 1.1318+ 0.838+ 0.587+ 0.4668 +0.406)
- 1461 days = Earth Cycle (365 +365 +365 +366)
(Data No. 7)
- (I)
- (6939.75)2
= 2x (4900)2
- (II)
- 6585.4 = 4900 x (1.16)2
- Where
- 6939.75 days = Metonic Cycle Period
- 6585.4 days = Saros Cycle Period

I do this research
2nd
36
Discussion
(Data No. 2)
- (A)
- 100733 million km x 2 = 4900 million km x 41
- 100733 million km = π x 32200 million km
- 32200 million km = (37100 million km – 4900 million km)
- (B)
- 2 x 16330 seconds x light (1160000 km/s) = 37100 million km (error 2%)
- (C)
- (between 4900 and 4810 the error 2%)
- Where
- 37100 million km = Pluto Orbital Circumference
- 41 degrees = The Planets Orbital Inclinations Total
- Notice
- We use light supposed velocity 1.16 million km per second
- And Light motion uses the distances as periods of time
What does this Data No. (2) tell? it tells
- The distances 4900 million km and 37100 million km depend on the period 16330
seconds by using the 2 light velocities (300000 km/s and 1160000 km/s), that tells
one period be used for the 2 distances

I do this research
2nd
37
- The data tells the planets orbital circumferences depend on these 2 distances
- Specifically,
- This equation tells, the planets orbital circumferences total (100733 million km)
depends on the 2 distances (37100 million km and 4900 million km) because the
rate 41 be produced based on them and (100733 = 4900 x 41)
- That tells, the planets orbital circumferences be created based on 4900 mkm and
37100 mkm as 2 basic points and these 2 points depend on the period 16330
seconds for the 2 light beam velocities – the next equation prove that-
- The period 16330 seconds is the original period based on which the 2 distances
(37100 mkm and 4900 mkm) be created and based on these 2 distances the planets
orbital circumferences be created
- But, because the motion is light motion – the distances be used as periods of time
and that explains the data.
- Shortly, the data tells we deal with one geometrical design – the idea is proved
clearly by the provided data – because – if the planets are rigid bodies separated
from one another how to explain this data
- Notice
- The difference from 16330 and 16030 is 2% which equals the difference between
197393 days the planets orbital periods total) and 2 x 100733 million km (the
planets orbital circumferences total) (also the difference =2%)
- The light motion caused to create the distances = the periods because x=ct by that
when c=1 the result will be x=t, that explains the data but more detailed discussion
be in the next equations
- Notice, Mars orbital period =16330 hours (error 1%) (we discuss later)

I do this research
2nd
38
- Data No. (2) Proves
(1) The Solar System Is One Geometrical Design
(2) Planets data be created by light motion behind
(3) The solar system geometrical design depends on the distance 4900 million km
as its base and principle distance.
(Data No. 3)
- (I)
- (2 x 100733 /197393) = (1.16/1.1318) = (0.6/0.5875)
- Where
- 197393 days = The Planets Orbital Periods Total
- 1.16 million km /s = The Light Supposed Velocity
- 0.6 million km = Light (300000 km/s) moves for 2 seconds
- 1.1318 million km = Jupiter Motion Distance Per Solar Day
- 0.5875 million km = Uranus Motion Distance Per Solar Day
- (II)
- (1.16/0.6) = (47.4/24.1) = (13.1/6.8) (35/17.9)
- Where
- 24.1 km/s = Mars Velocity
- 6.8 km/s = Uranus Velocity
- 17.9 km/s = Ceres Velocity

I do this research
2nd
39
- The Data No. (3) tells
- The Planets velocities be created in proportionality with light velocities
(300000km/s and 1160000 km/s)
- The Planets orbital circumferences and periods total be created based on light
motion velocities
- Jupiter and Uranus group is the only group can be used in the equation no. (I)
means, spite the other planets be in proportionality but their velocities
proportionality don't enable them to be used in Equation no. (I) that tells, because
Jupiter orbital circumference = 4900 million km and Uranus needs 4900 days to
pass a distance = Uranus orbital distance which means the value 4900 be used as
basic data in the 2 planets data – this 4900 – enable the 2 planets velocities to be
rated by the same rate between the planets orbital circumferences and periods total
while the other planets can do that because they don't use the value (4900) as their
basic data.
- (notice, we don't distinguish between the distance 4900 million km and he period
4900 days because light motion use both exchange)
- The data shows clearly that, one geometrical design be found behind the solar
system where this one design depends on the distance 4900 million km as its
principle distance
- Notice
- The data uses also (2 x 100733 million km) as the data no. (2), that tells the using
of the distance 2 x 100733 million km is a fact that because
- 2 x 100733 million km = 4900 million km x 41
- 41 degrees = the planets orbital inclinations total, if the equation uses only (100733
million km) that will produce the rate (20.5) which gives no geometrical meaning.

I do this research
2nd
40
(Data No. 4)
- (4900/3600) = (47.4/35) = (13.1/9.7) = (1.16)2
- Where
- Please notice, 3600 means 3600 seconds = an hour,
- The data tells,
- 4900 be created in comparison with 3600 based on 4 planets velocities rates
- That tells, the value 4900 be found by geometrical necessity
- Let's explain the data in more details
- Light (1160000 km/s) travels during 3600 seconds = 4176 million km
- And
- Light (1160000 km/s) travels during 4176 seconds = 4900 million km
- Where
- 4176 million km = 2 x 2094 million km (Jupiter Uranus Distance)
- By that the distances 2094 million km and 4900 million km are used distances in
the solar system data – we deal here with a geometrical design and not individual
rigid bodies –
- The next data can help that greatly
(Data No. 5)
- 3600 seconds x light (300000 km/s) = 2 x 550.7 million km (error 2%)
- 3600 seconds x light (1160000 km/s) = 2 x 2094 million km
- And
- 2094 seconds x light (1160000 km/s) x 2 = 4860 million km

I do this research
2nd
41
- The input are 3600 and 2094 seconds
- The out put are 550.7 million km (Jupiter Mars Distance), 2094 million km
(Jupiter Uranus Distance), 629 million km (Jupiter Earth Distance) and 4900
million km (Jupiter orbital Circumference)
- All Output Distances Be Used In The Solar System Distances (All Of Them Are
Jupiter Distances)
- Notice
- Light (1160000 km/s) during 550.7 seconds passes (629 million km) (error 2%)
- Light (1160000 km/s) during 629 seconds passes (720.7 million km) (error 1%)
(720.7 million km = Mercury Jupiter Distance)
Also
- Light (1160000 km/s) during 4900 seconds passes (5678 million km)
(5678 million km = Pluto Mars Distance)
- The data shows,
- The Distances Be Created Based On One Another, because, the light uses the
distances as periods of time to create other distances
- The data proves that we deal with one geometrical design because the distances be
created by light motion based on one another.
(Data No. 6)
- (i)
- Light (300000 km/s) x 4900 seconds = 1461 million km
- (ii)
- (iii)
- Where
- 17.75 million km = The planets motions distances total during a solar day
(including the moon motion distance)

I do this research
2nd
42
- (4.095+3.024+2.57+2.57+2.082+1.1318+0.838+0.587+0.4668+0.406)
- 1461 days = Earth Cycle (365 +365 +365 +366)
- The data tells
- The light creates the solar day period (86400 seconds) because light (1160000
km/s) travels during a solar day (86400 s) a distance = 100733 million km = The
Planets Orbital Circumferences Total.
- And
- The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total (= 100733 million km) defines the
distance 4900 million km
- The rate (86400/4900) defines the planets velocities total per solar day (17.75
million km)
- The data tells, the distance 4900 million km is comparable to the solar day period
(86400 seconds)
- Means
- The distance 4900 million km is the principle distance in the solar system
-
(Data No. 7)
- (I)
- (6939.75)2
= 2x (4900)2
- (II)
- 6585.4 = 4900 x (1.16)2
- Where
- 6939.75 days = Metonic Cycle Period
- 6585.4 days = Saros Cycle Period
- The data tells,
- There's one connection or continuum moves through the data – by that – this
continuum creates connections between different data – the continuum refers to
light motion effect on planets data -

I do this research
2nd
43
(Data No. 8) (Satrun Reflection)
- (a)
- (b)
- 4900 days = Uranus needs this period to pass a distance = Uranus Orbital Distance
- (c)
- (10747 /9800) = (9800 /9007)
- Where
- 10747 days = Saturn Orbital Period
- 9007 million km = Saturn Orbital Circumference
- 9800 = 2 x 4900
- Discussion
- The idea tells, some reflection be done at Saturn because the data shows reflection
at Saturn.
- By that, what's used as a distance before Saturn (4900 million km) (Jupiter) be
used as a period of time (4900 days) after Saturn (Uranus)
- Saturn itself uses 4900 as a period and distance together – Saturn data shows that
- The reflection is so complex than this simple idea because
- Uranus needs 4900 days to pass a distance = Uranus Orbital Distance
- Neptune needs 2 x 4900 days to pass a distance = Neptune Orbital Distance
- Pluto needs 3 x 4900 days to pass a distance = Pluto Orbital Distance
- (Neptune error 2% and Pluto error 1%)
- The 3 planets dependency on the period 4900 days is found by the following fact
- Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 x Saturn Orbital Distance
- Neptune Orbital Distance = π x Saturn Orbital Distance
- Pluto Orbital Distance = (π+1) x Saturn Orbital Distance
- Notice
- The discussion and proves of the point
- A Light Beam With A Velocity =1.16 million km /sec be found

I do this research
2nd
44
References and Biography
The Solar System Be Created By A Light Beam Its Velocity 1.16 mkm/Sec (Revised)
https://www.academia.edu/65143114/The_Solar_System_Be_Created_By_A_Light_Beam_Its_Velocity_1_16_mkm_Sec_Revised_
(Preprint No. 1) Mars Migration Theory
https://www.academia.edu/49051037/_Preprint_No_1_Mars_Migration_Theory
(Preprint No. 2) The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
https://www.academia.edu/49051029/_Preprint_No_2_The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Equation
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (II)
https://www.academia.edu/45181646/The_Moon_Orbital_Motion_Geometry_II_
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GergesTawdrous1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
VK https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Discord https://discord.gg/sgQFvUvT
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
Please scan the figure (ORCID)

A Research Presentation Summary.pdf

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to A Research Presentation Summary.pdf

Similar to A Research Presentation Summary.pdf (20)

More from Gerges francis

More from Gerges francis (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

A Research Presentation Summary.pdf