- The document discusses Mercury's rotation period and orbital period, and how they relate to other astronomical cycles and periods in the solar system, including Pluto's orbital period. Complex equations are presented relating distances, velocities, and time periods of various astronomical bodies. The author's conclusion is that a light beam traveling before planets created the dimensions of matter, space and time, and planets follow these dimensions like a "slave follows its master."
Why Does Mercury Day Period Need 5040 Seconds To Be 176 Solar Days Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon orbital inclination causes Mercury Day Period to be less than 176 solar days with 84 minutes
Paper Argument
- The paper shows that there are different interactions of motions between the planets regardless the distances between them..
- Specifically,
- The paper claims that, Uranus has a great effect on the inner plants motions and the Earth moon orbital inclination effect on Mercury Day Period is one example of different results cause by Uranus motion interaction with the inner planets motions
- The Earth moon orbital inclination effect causes Mercury day period to be less than 176 solar days with 5040 seconds.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (V)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here uses 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper Question
- The moon orbital inclination is 5.1 degrees
- But the rate 5.1 is used frequently through the planets motions data, for example
- (Venus velocity) / (Uranus velocity) = 5.14
- (Mars velocity) / (Pluto velocity) = 5.14
- (the moon velocity) / (Neptune velocity) = 5.14
- The rate 5.1 is used among tenths of the planets motions data – the question simply is Why?
- The paper provides this data and discuss why this huge number of data rated to one another by this same rate (5.1)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)Gerges francis
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
Venus Rotation Period Analysis (II) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Mercury motion is equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion
- This rate of time (1hour =24 hours) is used in the solar system motion and because of that ( Venus & Uranus motions use this same rate
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar group is a clock, its basic task is to receive the energy of light motion for 1 second and by this energy causes a planet motion for 1 solar day – because of that the rate of time ( 1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- The question is, Why Does The Solar System Need Different Rates Of Time?
- The direct answer for this question is that (to create a configuration for the moon orbital motion during its day period)
- The moon apogee orbital circumference = 2550973 km, where the moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) be = 2598693 km
- This difference in 2 distances is found as a result of the geometrical mechanism by which the rate of time (1 h is equivalent to 24 hours) is created.
- Shortly, because of these 2 distances difference, the moon motion has to create the rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours) in comparison with Mercury motion – which causes Mercury Motion to lead the moon motion. the paper discusses this process geometrical details.
- Notice
- The rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours = 1 solar day) is a rate used in the solar system but –
- The rate of time between Mercury and the moon motions almost is (1 hour of Mercury Motion is equivalent to 2 days of the moon motion) means (1 solar day of the moon motion = a half of hour of Mercury Motion)
- This conclusion is added to the paper discussion after revision – in the paper discussion we have to discuss this rate also in addition to the basic one (1 hour =24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- I have discovered The Earth Moon Basic Equation
- I call it (Gerges equation for the moon orbital motion)
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- I claim, the moon original motion is an identical to The Earth one, i.e. the moon moves daily a distance 2.58 mkm with an angle 0.985 deg. on the horizontal line.
- The moon motion daily rest angle (13.18 deg -0.985 deg= 12.195deg), it's created by of the moon daily displacement (88000 km)
- The moon daily motion depends on the angle (0.985 deg) as Earth motion, each day Earth adds (0.985 deg) to its revolution around the sun (till 360 degrees)
- But, Why the moon uses (The angle θ) in its motion? because
- The moon daily displacement (88000km) isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit, instead, the moon uses this value (88000 km) to create another real displacement suitable with the moon orbit radius… because of that, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its motion. the moon displacement (88000km) will be used as the right triangle hypotenuse, where the real displacement is (L =88000 cos θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Does Mercury Day Period Need 5040 Seconds To Be 176 Solar Days Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The Earth moon orbital inclination causes Mercury Day Period to be less than 176 solar days with 84 minutes
Paper Argument
- The paper shows that there are different interactions of motions between the planets regardless the distances between them..
- Specifically,
- The paper claims that, Uranus has a great effect on the inner plants motions and the Earth moon orbital inclination effect on Mercury Day Period is one example of different results cause by Uranus motion interaction with the inner planets motions
- The Earth moon orbital inclination effect causes Mercury day period to be less than 176 solar days with 5040 seconds.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (V)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here uses 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper Question
- The moon orbital inclination is 5.1 degrees
- But the rate 5.1 is used frequently through the planets motions data, for example
- (Venus velocity) / (Uranus velocity) = 5.14
- (Mars velocity) / (Pluto velocity) = 5.14
- (the moon velocity) / (Neptune velocity) = 5.14
- The rate 5.1 is used among tenths of the planets motions data – the question simply is Why?
- The paper provides this data and discuss why this huge number of data rated to one another by this same rate (5.1)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mercury day = 3 mercury rotation periods =2 mercury orbital periods, why (1)Gerges francis
Abstract
Mercury Day = 4222.6 hours, Mercury rotation period = 1407.6 hours and Mercury orbital period = 88 days
I claim the following:
- These three cycles are related to each other
- These three cycles depend on Jupiter Uranus distance (2095 mkm)
- Please remember that, Earth moon Metonic Cycle also depends on Jupiter Uranus distance which makes these 4 cycles are related to each other
By proving the previous claim I try to support my basic claim in all my papers that:
The Solar Group is one machine or one body, each planet should be considered as a gear in this machine or as a member in this body.
i.e.
No Planet Motion is Found Independent From Other Planets Motions
Venus Rotation Period Analysis (II) (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Mercury motion is equivalent to 24 hours of the moon motion
- This rate of time (1hour =24 hours) is used in the solar system motion and because of that ( Venus & Uranus motions use this same rate
The hypothesis explanation
- The solar group is a clock, its basic task is to receive the energy of light motion for 1 second and by this energy causes a planet motion for 1 solar day – because of that the rate of time ( 1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day)
- The question is, Why Does The Solar System Need Different Rates Of Time?
- The direct answer for this question is that (to create a configuration for the moon orbital motion during its day period)
- The moon apogee orbital circumference = 2550973 km, where the moon displacements total during its day period (29.53 days) be = 2598693 km
- This difference in 2 distances is found as a result of the geometrical mechanism by which the rate of time (1 h is equivalent to 24 hours) is created.
- Shortly, because of these 2 distances difference, the moon motion has to create the rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours) in comparison with Mercury motion – which causes Mercury Motion to lead the moon motion. the paper discusses this process geometrical details.
- Notice
- The rate of time (1 hour = 24 hours = 1 solar day) is a rate used in the solar system but –
- The rate of time between Mercury and the moon motions almost is (1 hour of Mercury Motion is equivalent to 2 days of the moon motion) means (1 solar day of the moon motion = a half of hour of Mercury Motion)
- This conclusion is added to the paper discussion after revision – in the paper discussion we have to discuss this rate also in addition to the basic one (1 hour =24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time (II)Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- We still discuss this same rule which we have discovered and tested in the previous paper…What we try to do here?
- I hope to test this same rule again in more planets data – because this rule gives an essential key to explain planets data creation, and this rule supports my research 2 basic hypothesis which are
- Hypothesis No. 1 (Planet motion depends on light motion)
- Hypothesis No. 2 (Light motion for 1 second causes planet motion for 1 solar day)
- Based on these 2 hypotheses this rule is concluded that (equal distances are use for different rates of time) –
- This rule is so interesting to be used because I have discovered many equal distances in the solar system but couldn't explain why these distances are equal – for that reason – this rule gives us a crucial key to answer this question
Let's remember the research progress points – where I have discovered light motion features in planet motion (13 features) and because of that I had to suggest my research 1st hypothesis and then the 2nd one – where the research 2nd hypothesis suggests that (there are different rates of time found in the solar system motion), then by analysis to know how these different rates of time are created and working, I have concluded this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) and now we test this rule in different examples to know it it's a correct one, if we prove that, this rule is a correct one that will support the research 2 hypothesis and its whole concept
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- I have discovered The Earth Moon Basic Equation
- I call it (Gerges equation for the moon orbital motion)
Gerges Equation For The Moon Orbital Motion
θ Per Solar Day = θ Of The Previous Day + 0.985 degrees
- The angle θ is the smallest one in a Pythagoras triangle
- 0.985 degrees = (360 degrees /365.25 days)
The Equation Concept
- I claim, the moon original motion is an identical to The Earth one, i.e. the moon moves daily a distance 2.58 mkm with an angle 0.985 deg. on the horizontal line.
- The moon motion daily rest angle (13.18 deg -0.985 deg= 12.195deg), it's created by of the moon daily displacement (88000 km)
- The moon daily motion depends on the angle (0.985 deg) as Earth motion, each day Earth adds (0.985 deg) to its revolution around the sun (till 360 degrees)
- But, Why the moon uses (The angle θ) in its motion? because
- The moon daily displacement (88000km) isn't used as a real displacement through the moon orbit, instead, the moon uses this value (88000 km) to create another real displacement suitable with the moon orbit radius… because of that, the moon uses Pythagoras triangle in its motion. the moon displacement (88000km) will be used as the right triangle hypotenuse, where the real displacement is (L =88000 cos θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
-Planet diameter (or circumference) is created as a function in another planet diameter and velocity
The hypothesis explanation
- By this technique the produced planet diameter will be in harmony with the parent one, and accordingly, will be in harmony with all other planets diameters, circumferences and motions
- This harmony is a necessary to guarantee the planets motions general harmony..
- Planet diameter creation depending on another planet diameter and velocity, is done by A Motion Transportation Process, and by that planet diameter is created in harmony with its velocity and day period
Based on this concept we can explain the following data
- Jupiter moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (+4%)
- Saturn moves during its day period a distance = its circumference (-1.2%)
- Neptune moves during its day period a distance = its circumference x 2
- This specific data is produced as results for the motion transportation process
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here use 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
- By that, 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion –
- This definition of the time rates depend on a new suggested rule tells that (Equal Distances create different rates of time)
- The paper tries to prove that, these rates of time are fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
-The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- This paper shows one more application using the previous rule … let's remember how we have concluded this rule in following
1. I have discussed light motion features in Planet motion
2. To explain these features of light motion, I had to provide the 1st hypothesis which tells (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
3. Then we needed to extent the discussion so I have added the 2nd hypothesis which tells (Light motion for 1 second causes Planet Motion for 1 solar day)
4. 2nd hypothesis tells us that, there are different rates of time in the solar system motion, so we have tried to discover these different rats of time through planets data analysis
5. then I have discovered this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) this rule tells us, Planets move equal distances to create different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VIII)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 2 Planets Velocities Rate expresses the rate of time between these 2 planets
The hypothesis explanation
- The hypotheses tells,
- Where (Earth Velocity / Pluto Velocity) =6.34, because of that, 1 hour of Earth motion be equivalent to 6.34 hours of Pluto Motion.
- By that the hypothesis shows the used rule for planet motion rate of time definition
- This hypothesis is required to answer the question (Can the 1 second period of time for any planet be = the 1 second period of time of another planet?)
- The idea tells us, where the (1 second period of time) is defined based on planet motion features, that may cause the (1 second period) to be different from a planet to another. (otherwise we need to answer, Why the period of 1 second of Earth day = the period of 1 second of Venus day?!)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Venus Motion = 24 hours of Uranus Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a great clock, its basic task is to uses a motion of 1 second (a light beam motion) to produce a motion of 1 solar day ( a planet motion)
- Because of that, the rate of time 1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours is used
- I claim, 1 hour of Venus motion is equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- This rate of time is produced by geometrical mechanism and interaction between the planets motions – for that – the light beam velocity isn't used to produce this rate directly by Lorentz Transformations
- This data is so important because it tells there's another method by which a different rate of time can be created – we discuss this method in this paper and tries to see how this different rate of time is produced by a motion transportation among the planets as among the gears
- The paper uses Venus rotation period as a platform for its discussion to explain ho this rate of time be created
- This rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a part of the great rate of time (1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day) – we discuss in this paper the rate (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why does Saturn move during its day period (10.7 h) a distance = (373644 km) = 98.67% of Saturn Circumference (378675 km)?
The Question Explanation
- Better we need to ask (Why should Saturn move in its day period a distance = its circumference?), what geometrical effect can be produced by that?
- If a planet moves during its day period a distance = its Circumference, that creates a proportionality between this planet circumference, its orbital circumference, its day period and its orbital period, showing this planet motion data is defined based on each other.
- So, if a planet moves during its day period a distance = its circumference, that may create one question controls these 4 planet motion data.
- Saturn gives us this chance, but not accurately, because Saturn moves during its day period a distance = 98.67% of its Circumference (there's a difference between the 2 distances =1.33%)
- Where the difference is so small, the same result can be produced but with some complexities.
- The paper analyzes Saturn motion data to see if such equation can be defined and what difficulties are still found in its way.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VII) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Uranus effect on the moon orbit causes the period of 1 hour (of a planet motion) to be equivalent to 1 solar day (of another planet motion)
- We still analyze the interesting data (the moon circumference =10921 km)
o Pluto moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Uranus diameter
o Jupiter moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Jupiter diameter
o But
o 51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 6.8 km/sc x 7511 seconds, the equation tells that, Uranus has to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = Uranus diameter (where 7511 km = Pluto circumference) – On The Other Side- Pluto has to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass (by rotation) 7511 km x6.8 = 51118 km (a distance = Uranus diameter)
o 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) = 13.1 km/sc x 10921 seconds, Jupiter moves 10921 seconds for its diameter and On The Other Side the moon has to rotate around its axis 13.1 times to pass a distance = Jupiter diameter
Paper question
o What geometrical mechanism behind this data?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motionGerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- There's a rate of time which is (1 hour of a planet motion is equivalent to 24 hours of another planet motion)? Why is this rate required for the solar system geometry?
The Question Explanation
- Pluto motion on one side in proportionality with the 3 inner planets motions total (Mercury + Venus + Earth) on the other side –causes to create this rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Why is this rate required?
- Because this rate of time is necessary for Saturn motion –shortly – Saturn motion depends on this rate of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Venus motion connects Mercury & Earth Motions
- Venus motion causes to create the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Venus rotation period is the main platform to use the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
- Venus uses (1 h) of (Mercury Motion) to be equivalent to (24 h) of Earth motion
- Venus motion shows one clear example of (the motion transportation) among the solar planets. (For Venus motion the transportation is done between Mercury and Earth motions)
- The solar group is A Great Clock (= a machine of gears) and the motion is transported among the planets as among gears.
The hypothesis Explanation
Paper objective:
- The paper analyzes Venus rotation period role in the rate of time creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 4) (There's A light Beam Velocity = 1.16 mkm per second)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 million km per second.
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis proves that a light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec must be found in the universe.
- Shortly, the solar planets data is created depends on a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec. And if this light beam isn't found the solar planets data can't be created.
Paper objective
- The paper provides and discuss the planets data which proves the hypothesis.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.5 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Questions
- The previous paper (Earth and Moon Motions Interaction) left us with 3 questions which are:
- (1st Question) If the Earth moon moves daily 2.58 mkm why we don't see it?
- (2nd Question) If the moon motion distance (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be (2.41 mkm), and the moon has to move 2.58 mkm to save its motion companying with Earth, how the moon creates the different distance (0.17 mkm) …..
o This question answered told us that, Venus Day Period (116.7 days) effects on the moon motion to causes the moon daily displacement 88000 km to be = (2 x 88000 km =0.17 mkm)
o But no geometrical mechanism is suggested to explain how Venus day does this task…
- (3rd Question) – Is Metonic Cycle a vertical motion?
Also
- Many points were necessary to be discussed in the previous paper, but I couldn't because we have stopped with the 2nd question (by what geometrical mechanism does Venus Day Period effect on the moon daily displacement 88000 km to make it equal 170000 km?)
- So let's discuss this question immediately…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (3)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why The Moon Orbital Circumference At Apogee Orbit = 2.55 Mkm?
The Question Explanation
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
Paper answer
- The moon uses a geometrical interaction depends on the difference between these 2 distances (2.55 mkm &2.598 mkm) to create the moon orbital inclination5.1 deg.
Paper hypotheses
(1st) There's a 2nd force effects on the moon motion in addition to Earth gravity
(2nd) Uranus Motion effects on the moon orbital motion and cause Metonic Cycle
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why Pluto Day Period = 153.3 hours?
The question explanation
- Pluto day period =153.3 hours
- Where the outer planets days periods are (9.9 h, 10.7 h, 17.2 h and 16.1 h).
- That shows Pluto day period = 3 folds their total together!
- Why Pluto has this long day period and how it's defined?
- Also
- Pluto (9.7 km/s) moves during its day period (153.3 h) a distance =2593836 km = Earth motion distance during the solar day 2574720 km (error 1%)
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km = Pluto motion distance during its day period 2593836 km (Zero Error)
- Can these distances equality be a reason behind Pluto day definition? Where
- (Pluto day period / Earth day period) = (Earth velocity/ Pluto velocity)
- Can this data be created based on a geometrical rules, depending on each other?
- Pluto motion distance during a solar day/ the Earth moon displacement daily) = (the Earth moon day period/ Pluto day period).
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Paper Hypothesis
- Planet Orbital Period, Rotation Period And Day Period (Planet Cycles Periods), Are Defined Depending On Each Other And On Other Planets Cycles Periods.
- 1 Hour On Mercury = 1 Solar Day On Earth (Venus Also uses This Rate Of Time)
- The Solar Group Is One Machine Works As A Mechanical Clock- Transports The Motion From Planet To Another With Different Rates Of Time, Aiming To Enable Light Motion During 1 Second Period To Cause A Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference(V)Gerges francis
Paper Question
- Why Jupiter motion effects on the Earth moon as similar to Uranus motion effect on Pluto? Let's prove that in following
For Jupiter
- Jupiter Velocity =13.1 km/sec, that means, Jupiter has to move during a period 10921 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km = Jupiter diameter
- where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference
For Uranus
- Uranus Velocity =6.8 km/sec, that means, Uranus has to move during a period 7511 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter
- where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
- The previous interesting data is just a window to complex relationships on both sides we have to discuss in this paper – any way the question asks directly why both planets are dealt by the same manner? Because
Paper Hypothesis
- Jupiter Orbital Distance is created as 2 Parts (778.6 mkm = 760 mkm +17.8 mkm), each one of the previous 2 relationships caused to create one part of Jupiter orbital distance
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
- 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Group is a great clock
- The Solar group uses energy of a motion for 1 second to cause another motion by this energy continues for 1 solar day
- Based on that, the solar planets work as gears transport the motion from one gear to another
- The motion transportation through the solar planets is done by creating different rates of time between the planets motions –
- Because of that, different rates of time are used among the solar planets
- The paper hypothesis provides one part of the general rate of time – we here use 4 planets motions and define their motions rates of time relative to each other
- By that, 48 h of the moon motion is equivalent to 1 h of Mercury motion and equivalent to 24 h of Mars Motion and equivalent to 9.23 h of Pluto motion –
- This definition of the time rates depend on a new suggested rule tells that (Equal Distances create different rates of time)
- The paper tries to prove that, these rates of time are fact
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
-The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
-The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of TimeGerges francis
Paper Claim
Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time
- This paper shows one more application using the previous rule … let's remember how we have concluded this rule in following
1. I have discussed light motion features in Planet motion
2. To explain these features of light motion, I had to provide the 1st hypothesis which tells (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
3. Then we needed to extent the discussion so I have added the 2nd hypothesis which tells (Light motion for 1 second causes Planet Motion for 1 solar day)
4. 2nd hypothesis tells us that, there are different rates of time in the solar system motion, so we have tried to discover these different rats of time through planets data analysis
5. then I have discovered this rule (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time) this rule tells us, Planets move equal distances to create different rates of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion.
Paper Argument
- Light motion can be similar to water motion and a planet motion is similar to waterwheel motion. the planet motion is done in a cycle but light motion is continuous one (as water never return back to the water wheel).
- Uranus motion data shows light motion effects on Mercury motion, by that, Mercury moves through its orbit (a cyclic motion) but light motion which causes planet motion does a continuous motion.
- By light motion effect, Mercury orbital period (88 days) is seen in the Earth moon motion as a distance (88000 km), and because the moon needs double value of its daily displacement (88000 km x 2! WHY?) Mercury makes its day period = 176 days =2 x 88 days (Mercury Orbital Period)
Shortly
- Uranus Effect on Mercury & the moon motions causes their motions to be done in one cooperative motion.
- Because of that, Mercury day period needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days because the moon orbital inclination =5.1 degrees effects on Mercury Day Period.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group is A Clock (VIII)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 2 Planets Velocities Rate expresses the rate of time between these 2 planets
The hypothesis explanation
- The hypotheses tells,
- Where (Earth Velocity / Pluto Velocity) =6.34, because of that, 1 hour of Earth motion be equivalent to 6.34 hours of Pluto Motion.
- By that the hypothesis shows the used rule for planet motion rate of time definition
- This hypothesis is required to answer the question (Can the 1 second period of time for any planet be = the 1 second period of time of another planet?)
- The idea tells us, where the (1 second period of time) is defined based on planet motion features, that may cause the (1 second period) to be different from a planet to another. (otherwise we need to answer, Why the period of 1 second of Earth day = the period of 1 second of Venus day?!)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis:
-The Earth moon is found inside an interaction occurred between Mercury and Jupiter Motions, because of that, the moon orbital motion can't be explained independent from Mercury and Jupiter Motions.
The hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells that, Mercury and Jupiter motions effect on the moon motion and creates features can't be explained independent of Mercury and Jupiter Motions effect.
- The claim refers to that, the moon orbital motion is done based on geometrical rules that means, the moon moves by gravity force by not in a direct effect but through geometrical rules, to explain that, let's imagine a car moves on a track and this track has walls on both sides, so the car has one option only to move forward, so this motion of car is done by its motor but if the walls aren't found the car could move in different directions but now the car has only one option – similar to that- the moon moves by gravity forces but in a geometrical designed track and because of that the moon has only limited options to do its motion- by that – the motion doesn't depend on gravity forces only but also on the track geometrical design.
Paper objective
- The paper analyzes the moon orbital motion track geometrical design and rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- 1 hour of Venus Motion = 24 hours of Uranus Motion
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a great clock, its basic task is to uses a motion of 1 second (a light beam motion) to produce a motion of 1 solar day ( a planet motion)
- Because of that, the rate of time 1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours is used
- I claim, 1 hour of Venus motion is equivalent to 24 hours of Uranus motion
- This rate of time is produced by geometrical mechanism and interaction between the planets motions – for that – the light beam velocity isn't used to produce this rate directly by Lorentz Transformations
- This data is so important because it tells there's another method by which a different rate of time can be created – we discuss this method in this paper and tries to see how this different rate of time is produced by a motion transportation among the planets as among the gears
- The paper uses Venus rotation period as a platform for its discussion to explain ho this rate of time be created
- This rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) is a part of the great rate of time (1 second is equivalent to 1 solar day) – we discuss in this paper the rate (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why does Saturn move during its day period (10.7 h) a distance = (373644 km) = 98.67% of Saturn Circumference (378675 km)?
The Question Explanation
- Better we need to ask (Why should Saturn move in its day period a distance = its circumference?), what geometrical effect can be produced by that?
- If a planet moves during its day period a distance = its Circumference, that creates a proportionality between this planet circumference, its orbital circumference, its day period and its orbital period, showing this planet motion data is defined based on each other.
- So, if a planet moves during its day period a distance = its circumference, that may create one question controls these 4 planet motion data.
- Saturn gives us this chance, but not accurately, because Saturn moves during its day period a distance = 98.67% of its Circumference (there's a difference between the 2 distances =1.33%)
- Where the difference is so small, the same result can be produced but with some complexities.
- The paper analyzes Saturn motion data to see if such equation can be defined and what difficulties are still found in its way.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Uranus Is Perpendicular On Earth Moon Orbit (VII) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
Uranus effect on the moon orbit causes the period of 1 hour (of a planet motion) to be equivalent to 1 solar day (of another planet motion)
- We still analyze the interesting data (the moon circumference =10921 km)
o Pluto moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Uranus diameter
o Jupiter moves during 10921 seconds a distance = Jupiter diameter
o But
o 51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 6.8 km/sc x 7511 seconds, the equation tells that, Uranus has to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance = Uranus diameter (where 7511 km = Pluto circumference) – On The Other Side- Pluto has to rotate 6.8 times around its axis to pass (by rotation) 7511 km x6.8 = 51118 km (a distance = Uranus diameter)
o 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) = 13.1 km/sc x 10921 seconds, Jupiter moves 10921 seconds for its diameter and On The Other Side the moon has to rotate around its axis 13.1 times to pass a distance = Jupiter diameter
Paper question
o What geometrical mechanism behind this data?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon uses pythagoras triangle technique in its orbital motionGerges francis
The Moon Uses Pythagoras Triangle Technique In Its Orbital Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle as one of the moon orbital motion techniques
The hypothesis Explanation:
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) by using Pythagoras triangle technique.
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- That means, if the moon displacement (88000 km) can't be decreased and be its daily orbital displacement through its, the moon would revolve around Earth through only its orbit apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and can't revolve through any more near orbits.
- The moon using of Pythagoras triangle in its orbital motion, creates a great Pythagoras triangle controls the moon orbital motion and its orbit geometrical structure.
Paper objective:
- The paper proves this fact and discusses the geometrical basics based on which the moon orbital triangle is created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- There's a rate of time which is (1 hour of a planet motion is equivalent to 24 hours of another planet motion)? Why is this rate required for the solar system geometry?
The Question Explanation
- Pluto motion on one side in proportionality with the 3 inner planets motions total (Mercury + Venus + Earth) on the other side –causes to create this rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Why is this rate required?
- Because this rate of time is necessary for Saturn motion –shortly – Saturn motion depends on this rate of time
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Venus motion connects Mercury & Earth Motions
- Venus motion causes to create the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours)
- Venus rotation period is the main platform to use the rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours).
- Venus uses (1 h) of (Mercury Motion) to be equivalent to (24 h) of Earth motion
- Venus motion shows one clear example of (the motion transportation) among the solar planets. (For Venus motion the transportation is done between Mercury and Earth motions)
- The solar group is A Great Clock (= a machine of gears) and the motion is transported among the planets as among gears.
The hypothesis Explanation
Paper objective:
- The paper analyzes Venus rotation period role in the rate of time creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
(Preprint No. 4) (There's A light Beam Velocity = 1.16 mkm per second)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 million km per second.
The hypothesis explanation
- The Solar Planets Data Analysis proves that a light beam with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec must be found in the universe.
- Shortly, the solar planets data is created depends on a light beam its velocity 1.16 mkm/sec. And if this light beam isn't found the solar planets data can't be created.
Paper objective
- The paper provides and discuss the planets data which proves the hypothesis.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
A Modification In
The Moon Orbital Motion Equation
The Old Form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 (of Previous Day) + 0.98562 degrees
The Modified form
θ1 (Per Solar Day) = θ0 ( of Previous Day) + 1.5 degrees
- The Equation uses 1.5 degrees in place of the angle (0.98562 degrees) because the moon axial tilt declines on the Earth Ecliptic line with 1.5 degrees.
- This paper tests the new modification on the equation accuracy
- The modified equation defines the moon position with an accuracy =96.12 %
(where the error is (3.88 %))
The Equation Concept
- The moon uses Pythagoras triangle to do the following job. While the moon moves a daily displacement =88000 km, The moon real displacement (L) through its orbit can be less than (88000 km) where (L =88000 Cos (θ))
- The moon needs to decrease its daily displacement (88000 km) through its orbit to enable the moon to revolve around Earth in more near orbits to Earth
- The angle (θ) defines the moon real displacement and its distance to perigee radius (r=0.363 mkm).
- For that reason the equation depends on the angle (θ).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Questions
- The previous paper (Earth and Moon Motions Interaction) left us with 3 questions which are:
- (1st Question) If the Earth moon moves daily 2.58 mkm why we don't see it?
- (2nd Question) If the moon motion distance (2.58 mkm) is contracted to be (2.41 mkm), and the moon has to move 2.58 mkm to save its motion companying with Earth, how the moon creates the different distance (0.17 mkm) …..
o This question answered told us that, Venus Day Period (116.7 days) effects on the moon motion to causes the moon daily displacement 88000 km to be = (2 x 88000 km =0.17 mkm)
o But no geometrical mechanism is suggested to explain how Venus day does this task…
- (3rd Question) – Is Metonic Cycle a vertical motion?
Also
- Many points were necessary to be discussed in the previous paper, but I couldn't because we have stopped with the 2nd question (by what geometrical mechanism does Venus Day Period effect on the moon daily displacement 88000 km to make it equal 170000 km?)
- So let's discuss this question immediately…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Orbital Motion Geometry (Revised) (3)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypotheses
Hypothesis no. 1
Pluto motion effects on the moon orbital motion and causes to create the moon orbital inclination (5.1 degrees)
As a result of this effect the moon orbital circumference at apogee orbit be shorter than the moon displacements total during 29.53 days with 1%
Hypothesis no. 2
Pluto and Uranus Axial Tilts Interaction causes the moon orbit regression (19 degrees per year) and also causes Venus Axial Tilt Regression.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why The Moon Orbital Circumference At Apogee Orbit = 2.55 Mkm?
The Question Explanation
- The moon displacement daily = 88000 km, and during 29.5 days (The Moon Day Period), the total displacements will =2.598 mkm, which should be = the moon orbital circumference. But 2.598 mkm = 2π x 413000 km
- The apogee radius =406000 km, is the most far point the moon can reach from Earth, where the perigee radius =363000 km, which is its nearest one
- Why the moon orbital circumference at apogee doesn't = 2.598 mkm?!
Paper answer
- The moon uses a geometrical interaction depends on the difference between these 2 distances (2.55 mkm &2.598 mkm) to create the moon orbital inclination5.1 deg.
Paper hypotheses
(1st) There's a 2nd force effects on the moon motion in addition to Earth gravity
(2nd) Uranus Motion effects on the moon orbital motion and cause Metonic Cycle
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
Why Pluto Day Period = 153.3 hours?
The question explanation
- Pluto day period =153.3 hours
- Where the outer planets days periods are (9.9 h, 10.7 h, 17.2 h and 16.1 h).
- That shows Pluto day period = 3 folds their total together!
- Why Pluto has this long day period and how it's defined?
- Also
- Pluto (9.7 km/s) moves during its day period (153.3 h) a distance =2593836 km = Earth motion distance during the solar day 2574720 km (error 1%)
- The Earth moon displacements total during 29.53 days = 2598693 km = Pluto motion distance during its day period 2593836 km (Zero Error)
- Can these distances equality be a reason behind Pluto day definition? Where
- (Pluto day period / Earth day period) = (Earth velocity/ Pluto velocity)
- Can this data be created based on a geometrical rules, depending on each other?
- Pluto motion distance during a solar day/ the Earth moon displacement daily) = (the Earth moon day period/ Pluto day period).
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper tries to summarize the main ideas and questions in my previous papers -
It's just a guide through my papers – and I add some data for references which can be used in planets data analysis
Paper Hypothesis
- Planet Orbital Period, Rotation Period And Day Period (Planet Cycles Periods), Are Defined Depending On Each Other And On Other Planets Cycles Periods.
- 1 Hour On Mercury = 1 Solar Day On Earth (Venus Also uses This Rate Of Time)
- The Solar Group Is One Machine Works As A Mechanical Clock- Transports The Motion From Planet To Another With Different Rates Of Time, Aiming To Enable Light Motion During 1 Second Period To Cause A Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day
Does Planet Day Period Depend On Its Circumference(V)Gerges francis
Paper Question
- Why Jupiter motion effects on the Earth moon as similar to Uranus motion effect on Pluto? Let's prove that in following
For Jupiter
- Jupiter Velocity =13.1 km/sec, that means, Jupiter has to move during a period 10921 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km = Jupiter diameter
- where 10921 km = the Earth moon circumference
For Uranus
- Uranus Velocity =6.8 km/sec, that means, Uranus has to move during a period 7511 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter
- where 7511 km = Pluto circumference
- The previous interesting data is just a window to complex relationships on both sides we have to discuss in this paper – any way the question asks directly why both planets are dealt by the same manner? Because
Paper Hypothesis
- Jupiter Orbital Distance is created as 2 Parts (778.6 mkm = 760 mkm +17.8 mkm), each one of the previous 2 relationships caused to create one part of Jupiter orbital distance
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis
- The motion is transported between Venus, Saturn and Uranus
The hypothesis explanation
- Because the solar group is a clock and
- There's a rate of time (1 hour is equivalent to 24 hours) between Venus & Uranus Motions (as supposed in the previous paper)
- The motion is considered to be transported among the planets as similar to the motion transportation among the gears.
- But
- The planets aren't gears. Because of that, some different rules should control the motion transportation process (if it's found really)
Paper objective
- The paper provides a new example of (a motion transportation among the planets), in this example, the paper discussion tries to conclude the basic rules on which the motion can be transported among the planets.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why the moon synodic month (29.53 days) is increased by 2.23 days on the moon sidereal month (27.3 days)?
(The moon word means the Earth Moon where the paper deals with no other moon)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves)
Abstract
Time And Distance Values Can Be Equivalent In Higher Velocity
i.e.
Time & Distance Values Equivalence Is Occurred As A Relativistic Effect.
Briefly ….
When a particle moves with high velocity (near to light velocity), So this particle may suffer from the following effects:
1- Mass Increasing
2- Length Contraction
3- Time Dilation
4- Time & Distance Values Equivalence
Point No. 4 is my conclusion I have reach through The Solar Planets Data Analysis -
This paper tries to prove this fact that
(Time and Distance Values can be equivalent – In Higher Velocity)
Why Mercury Day Period = 4222.6 hours? (II)Gerges francis
-There's a light beam travels with velocity 1.16 mkm/sec
-The Solar System is a puppets theater – the planets move together one unified motion as a train carriage
-The solar system unified motion depends on a period = 8 Mercury Day Periods =1407.6 solar days
-The planets unified motion main cycle (1461 days) depends on the period 1407.6 days (=8 Mercury Day Periods)
-The solar system is a machine moves to create different rates of time - so a planet cycle uses the second period to create the minute period –another cycle uses the minutes to create the hour period, and another uses the hours to create the solar day …..etc
- For example Mercury 8 days period (1407.6 solar days) is used as its rotation period (1407.6 hours) –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why is Saturn Velocity 9.7 km Per Second (II) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Planet Day Period Definition
- The planet day period is the period during which the planet moves a distance = its circumference.
- Saturn follows this definition and moves during its day period 10.7 hours a distance = Saturn Circumference (error 1.3)
But
- Neptune moves during its day period (16.1 hours) a distance = 2 Neptune Circumferences
- Why not all planets follow this same definition? How the planet day period is defined?
- The paper discusses these questions
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Gerges francis
Paper Claim
Venus and Mars Motions Interactive Effect Causes To Create A New Rate Of Time In The Solar System Motion
Let's remember the different rates of time argument in following:
- I have discovered many of light motion features in Planet Motion
- Because of that, I have tried to explain how such features are created, then I had to suggest the 1st hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
- For detailed investigation I had to suggest the 2nd hypothesis (Light Motion For 1 Second Causes Planet Motion For 1 Day)
- The research 2nd hypothesis suggests that, there are different rate of time in the solar system, then I have concluded the basic rule to create these different rates of time which is (Equal Distances Are Used For Different Rates Of Time)
Then
- I have found that, the original rate of time which is (1 Second Of Light Motion Is Equivalent For 1 Solar Day (86400 seconds) Of Planet Motion) this rate of time is valid always in the solar system motion ….
But
- In the Earth moon orbit, this rate is changed into one more rate of time which is (1 Day Of The Sun Is Equivalent Of A Year (365.25 Days) Of Earth)
i.e.
- The 1st rate of time is found generally in the solar system but the 2nd rate of time is found in the Earth moon orbit – the nest question should be why??
- This is happened because of Venus & Mars Motions Interactive Effect On The Earth Moon Orbit And Motion.. so this paper tries to discover the geometrical mechanism by which this effect is created…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Earth Motion
1- Abstract
Earth motion is one paper I have promised to write from years, just now I can do that!
Why have I promised but couldn't? ….the reason was the following…
- The moon orbital radius at total solar eclipse = 0.370 mkm, its circumference = 2.32 mkm = 58.6 x 40080 km (Earth Circumference)
- Now let's imagine:
- If the moon orbital circumference (2.32 mkm) is a great gear and the Earth circumference (40080 km) is a small gear …. Now let's these gears to rotate
- The great gear (2.32 mkm) needs to rotates (one time only), and that will causes the small gear to rotate 58.6 times, means Earth circumference will rotate around its axis 58.6 times but one rotation of Earth circumference means one solar day, so Earth will rotate (58.6 solar days).
- But ….Earth moves per solar day a distance = 2.58 million km
- 2.58 mkm x 58.6 days = 149.6 million km (Earth Orbital Distance)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity (Part No.2)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Planet diameter be created depending on a period of time? And can it be used as a period of time by the rate (1 km = 1 second)?
Paper question explanation
- One more time we have to ask
- Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?
- What's the planet diameter according to Newton Vision?, But
- Jupiter diameter 142984 km can be = 4 Jupiter days periods total
- Saturn diameter 120536 km can be = (π x 10.7 h) (Saturn day period 10.7 h)
- The moon circumference can be = 1/8 of the solar day (if 1 km =1 sec)
- This data be considered as results of pure coincidences of numbers by Newton vision but more data shows that – in fact – Planet diameter be created as a function in some period of time and be used as a period of time – for example
- Venus (35 km/s) moves during 12104 s a distance = 421056 km = Uranus motion distance during its day period (where 12104 km = Venus diameter) and
- Neptune (5.4 km/s) moves during 155597 s a distance = 838000 km = 7 Saturn diameters = Saturn motion distance during a solar day
- Newton simply didn't see these motions because he supposed the planet diameter is a piece of rock created by some random process
- Newton theory of the sun gravity is mistaken because the theory components are not defined – the planet diameter is an example
- I want to say
- The solar system is a complex network of motions – Newton theory sees only the planets revolutions around the sun – and by that the basic part of motions be hidden and not defined by the theory
- As a result
- The planets motions features be far from Newton Theory- basically for 3 reasons which are
(1) The Motion Be Transported Among The Solar Planets
(2) The Solar System Distances Be Created Based On A Continuum –and not as individual independent distances
(3) The planets motions effect mutually on one another and these effects can't be attributed to the mass gravity forces
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Objective
The Moon Motion Trajectory Rules Definition
- There 3 basic rules are known in the moon motion trajectory, which can help us in our investigation to discover the moon motion trajectory…
- The 1st rule
o "There Is Another Force Equal Earth Gravity Force Effect On The Moon Motion Trajectory, This force Is expressed By point (A) in The moon orbital triangle, This Point (A) is found beyond apogee point with 43000 km, i.e. The distance between the Earth and this point (A) = 449000 km"
- The 2nd rule
o The moon orbital triangle shows that, the moon motion 4 basic radius (which are Perigee, Apogee, total solar eclipse, and the orbital distance), these 4 points are defined based on each other by using Pythagoras rule (the Pythagoras equation should use the term 86000 km as a right triangle dimension and the other dimension should be any radius of the 4 radiuses and the result will be another radius of them) – so is this the way by which the moon move? i.e. does the moon move through its motion trajectory based on Pythagoras rule?)
- The 3r rule
o The Cycle 1290 days of the moon motion, this cycle gives us a clear light about how the moon moves through its orbital motion trajectory
- Because we know the rules No 1 and 3, the paper will discuss only the rule no. 3 and review both old rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
- Solar Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
That means
- Planet motion at least is a double motions – i.e. light and planet moves together
Or
- In more clear words – Plant motion is resulted from light motion –
That Means
- Light motion produces energy which planet uses for its motion – so planet motion is done depending on light motion
How to understand that??
- Is there a light beam moves with each planet?? NO
- The solar group is one machine (one train) – and there's one light beam moves and causes by his motion to move the whole solar group (the train) –
So
- Solar Planets motions are NOT several motions – on the contrary – it's only one motion – all solar planets move together in ONE Motion as a train (planets = Train carriages) – but for solar planets not all planets move by the same velocity that doesn't disprove the theory – the motion is one but the gears (Planets) move with different velocities
This paper tries to prove this fact
Earth Moon moves with 2 Rates Of Time (Part IV)Gerges francis
Why Mercury Day Period = 2 Mercury Orbital Periods= 3 Mercury Rotation Periods?
We still discuss this question whose discussion is started in the previous paper
"Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 Saturn Orbital Distances"
Also we try to know If the previous relationship has any effect of Mercury Data
We complete the same discussion (in previous parts of the same series
The paper adds more data to prove the same concept that
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Let's review this concept argument in following:
-Why did I suggest that "Planet Motion depends on light Motion?"
-The main reason is that
-"Planet Motion Shows Geometrical Rules And Interactions Can't Be Explained By The Rigid Body Motion Mechanics"
-Planet Motion shows complex geometrical structures can't be found in the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (II)" I have provided 9 geometrical features are observed in the solar system geometry which can't be found by the rigid body motion mechanics
And
In the previous paper "Could Plato Cave Be A Fact? (III)" I have provided many questions and a theoretical investigation concerning this same concept
In this paper I provide more data which can support the concept clearly
Now … If really "Planet Motion depends On Light Motion" that will explain clearly Plato cave because we see the planets motions while the light motions are found hidden behind these planets motions and because of that we are prisoners in the cave
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper hypothesis:
- 2 New Cycles are discovered which are:
o A Cycle of 8 of Pluto Days Period (1226.4 hours)
o A Cycle of 8 of Jupiter Days Period (79.2 hours)
o Jupiter Day Cycle depends on Pluto Day Cycle
Paper Argument:
- The new discovered cycles proves the following arguments
o The motion energy is transported from Uranus to Jupiter then to Saturn (Or from Neptune to Uranus to Jupiter and then to Saturn)
o Planet Circumference is a player effects on the produced cycles by this planet motion.
o Planets Motions are a network created based on interactions between these planets motions – Planets data is created based on this network motions interactions.
o Saturn data is effected by Uranus and Neptune Motions Interaction.
The Earth moon is a planet found inside basic motions interactions and because of that, Its data is effected by almost (all) planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
- Mercury Day Period =2 Mercury Orbital period = 3 Mercury Rotation period
- Why?
The Question Explanation
- Frequently we have asked this question, it's noticeable and promised data, which may hides behind the solar system creation and motion secrets
- Now, the answer be available, let's summarize it in following:
- The solar system motion depends on a cycle of (8 days) of some planets
- Also
Paper Objective
- The paper discusses the cycles (8 and 6 days) origin and effect
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Question
Why the moon orbital circumference =Earth Motion distance during 1solar day?
- This question was the first one I have faced in the moon orbital motion- may try to solve it in following….
- Planet motion depends on light motion based on the hypothesis (1 second of light motion causes Planet motion for 1 solar day), this hypothesis creates the 1st rate of time in the solar system which is (1 second of light = 1 day of planet)
- The 1st rate of time dominates any planet motion – but – in the Earth Moon Orbit, this rate is changed by Venus & Mars Motions Effect
- (86400 = 237 x 365), where 237 = (Venus rotation period/ Mars rotation period) and 365 =(Earth orbital circumference /the moon orbital circumference)
- Venus & Mars Motions Interaction cause to remove the rate (237) from the previous equation- and because of that (1 day on the sun = 365 days on Earth) and that causes the moon orbital circumference = Earth motion distance daily
But
- The moon circumference shows also this same rate, as we have concluded that from (10921 km the moon circumference x 86400 seconds = 940 mk) This equation tells that, if Earth revolves around the sun a complete revolution in one Solar Day Only, so the moon circumference in this case will equal the Earth motion distance during 1 second…means the rate (1 is equivalent to 365) is seen again in the moon circumference as we have seen it in the moon orbit..!
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Why does Earth rotate 4-years Cycle?
Because there's an interaction and coherence between Earth, Moon and Mars Motions, this interaction causes this 4-years Cycle
This paper tries to prove this fact, and explains its mechanism.
Also we discuss here the "Distance" and "Time" Definitions, explaining how to distinguish between the matter and space.
(Preprint No. 3) (Planet 8 Days Cycle)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Planets Motions depend On 2 Basic Cycles which are:
(A Cycle Of 8 Days) and (A Cycle of 6 days)
The hypothesis explanation
- The paper hypothesis tells, the solar planet motion can't be considered as an independent motion, because the planets move together based on one general system. This system uses (8 days Cycle) of some planets and (6 days Cycle) of other planets to create a general unified motion.
- Based on that the solar planets motions should be considered as (A Train Carriages Motion). The Planets move together one unified motion in which the planets motions data be complementary with each other
- That proves the claim, the solar group is created based on one geometrical design and that necessitates the planets data to be complementary with one another. by that the solar group should be considered as one machine of Gears and each planet is a gear in it.
- The (8 days) and (6 days) cycles should be used as a proof for this fact.
Paper contents
- The paper explains and discusses the 2 basic Cycles.
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? (Kepler Law Analysis)
Abstract
Paper question
Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) - Why?
What would happen if (Planet Orbit Doesn't Define Its Velocity)?
The answer of this question be summarized in 5 points which are:
(1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
(2)
Planet Diameter Should Be An Indirect Function In Its Orbital Distance
(3)
Planet Mass Effects On Its Diameter Definition Equation
(4)
The Necessity Of The Function Between Planet Orbit And Its Velocity
(5)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity And The Big Bang Theory.
Let's consider each point in some details in following
(Point No. 1)
Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
- Planet data (Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, velocity, rotation period and axial tilt), this data be created based on exact equations and no single data be created by random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
- As in a plane or rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight….etc – all data and specifications be defined based on exact equations – similar to that Planet data be created based on exact equations.
- If planet data doesn't depend on exact equations, this planet can't move because the planet is moving through its trajectory and if this motion suffer from no harmony with All planet data – this planet will be broken through its motion – because it moves against its internal structure – we will discuss this idea deeply later.
(continued)
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Cancer cell metabolism: special Reference to Lactate PathwayAADYARAJPANDEY1
Normal Cell Metabolism:
Cellular respiration describes the series of steps that cells use to break down sugar and other chemicals to get the energy we need to function.
Energy is stored in the bonds of glucose and when glucose is broken down, much of that energy is released.
Cell utilize energy in the form of ATP.
The first step of respiration is called glycolysis. In a series of steps, glycolysis breaks glucose into two smaller molecules - a chemical called pyruvate. A small amount of ATP is formed during this process.
Most healthy cells continue the breakdown in a second process, called the Kreb's cycle. The Kreb's cycle allows cells to “burn” the pyruvates made in glycolysis to get more ATP.
The last step in the breakdown of glucose is called oxidative phosphorylation (Ox-Phos).
It takes place in specialized cell structures called mitochondria. This process produces a large amount of ATP. Importantly, cells need oxygen to complete oxidative phosphorylation.
If a cell completes only glycolysis, only 2 molecules of ATP are made per glucose. However, if the cell completes the entire respiration process (glycolysis - Kreb's - oxidative phosphorylation), about 36 molecules of ATP are created, giving it much more energy to use.
IN CANCER CELL:
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
Unlike healthy cells that "burn" the entire molecule of sugar to capture a large amount of energy as ATP, cancer cells are wasteful.
Cancer cells only partially break down sugar molecules. They overuse the first step of respiration, glycolysis. They frequently do not complete the second step, oxidative phosphorylation.
This results in only 2 molecules of ATP per each glucose molecule instead of the 36 or so ATPs healthy cells gain. As a result, cancer cells need to use a lot more sugar molecules to get enough energy to survive.
introduction to WARBERG PHENOMENA:
WARBURG EFFECT Usually, cancer cells are highly glycolytic (glucose addiction) and take up more glucose than do normal cells from outside.
Otto Heinrich Warburg (; 8 October 1883 – 1 August 1970) In 1931 was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology for his "discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme.
WARNBURG EFFECT : cancer cells under aerobic (well-oxygenated) conditions to metabolize glucose to lactate (aerobic glycolysis) is known as the Warburg effect. Warburg made the observation that tumor slices consume glucose and secrete lactate at a higher rate than normal tissues.
(May 29th, 2024) Advancements in Intravital Microscopy- Insights for Preclini...Scintica Instrumentation
Intravital microscopy (IVM) is a powerful tool utilized to study cellular behavior over time and space in vivo. Much of our understanding of cell biology has been accomplished using various in vitro and ex vivo methods; however, these studies do not necessarily reflect the natural dynamics of biological processes. Unlike traditional cell culture or fixed tissue imaging, IVM allows for the ultra-fast high-resolution imaging of cellular processes over time and space and were studied in its natural environment. Real-time visualization of biological processes in the context of an intact organism helps maintain physiological relevance and provide insights into the progression of disease, response to treatments or developmental processes.
In this webinar we give an overview of advanced applications of the IVM system in preclinical research. IVIM technology is a provider of all-in-one intravital microscopy systems and solutions optimized for in vivo imaging of live animal models at sub-micron resolution. The system’s unique features and user-friendly software enables researchers to probe fast dynamic biological processes such as immune cell tracking, cell-cell interaction as well as vascularization and tumor metastasis with exceptional detail. This webinar will also give an overview of IVM being utilized in drug development, offering a view into the intricate interaction between drugs/nanoparticles and tissues in vivo and allows for the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in a variety of tissues and organs. This interdisciplinary collaboration continues to drive the advancements of novel therapeutic strategies.
The increased availability of biomedical data, particularly in the public domain, offers the opportunity to better understand human health and to develop effective therapeutics for a wide range of unmet medical needs. However, data scientists remain stymied by the fact that data remain hard to find and to productively reuse because data and their metadata i) are wholly inaccessible, ii) are in non-standard or incompatible representations, iii) do not conform to community standards, and iv) have unclear or highly restricted terms and conditions that preclude legitimate reuse. These limitations require a rethink on data can be made machine and AI-ready - the key motivation behind the FAIR Guiding Principles. Concurrently, while recent efforts have explored the use of deep learning to fuse disparate data into predictive models for a wide range of biomedical applications, these models often fail even when the correct answer is already known, and fail to explain individual predictions in terms that data scientists can appreciate. These limitations suggest that new methods to produce practical artificial intelligence are still needed.
In this talk, I will discuss our work in (1) building an integrative knowledge infrastructure to prepare FAIR and "AI-ready" data and services along with (2) neurosymbolic AI methods to improve the quality of predictions and to generate plausible explanations. Attention is given to standards, platforms, and methods to wrangle knowledge into simple, but effective semantic and latent representations, and to make these available into standards-compliant and discoverable interfaces that can be used in model building, validation, and explanation. Our work, and those of others in the field, creates a baseline for building trustworthy and easy to deploy AI models in biomedicine.
Bio
Dr. Michel Dumontier is the Distinguished Professor of Data Science at Maastricht University, founder and executive director of the Institute of Data Science, and co-founder of the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) data principles. His research explores socio-technological approaches for responsible discovery science, which includes collaborative multi-modal knowledge graphs, privacy-preserving distributed data mining, and AI methods for drug discovery and personalized medicine. His work is supported through the Dutch National Research Agenda, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Horizon Europe, the European Open Science Cloud, the US National Institutes of Health, and a Marie-Curie Innovative Training Network. He is the editor-in-chief for the journal Data Science and is internationally recognized for his contributions in bioinformatics, biomedical informatics, and semantic technologies including ontologies and linked data.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
A brief information about the SCOP protein database used in bioinformatics.
The Structural Classification of Proteins (SCOP) database is a comprehensive and authoritative resource for the structural and evolutionary relationships of proteins. It provides a detailed and curated classification of protein structures, grouping them into families, superfamilies, and folds based on their structural and sequence similarities.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Mercury Rotation Period Creation
The Author Authorized To Be Used By
Mr. Gerges Francis Tawdrous
A Student–Physics Department- Physics
& Mathematics Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate Professor (Mathematical Analysis
and Theory of Functions Department)
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
(RUDN University) – Moscow – Russia
Phone +201022532292
E-Mail: mrwaheid@gmail.com
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
Phone +7 (495) 952-35-83
E-Mail: budochkina-sa@rudn.ru, sbudotchkina@yandex.ru
Website
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=19024
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo –Egypt –20th
November 2020
Abstract
- 142984 km = 13.1 km/sec (Jupiter velocity) x10921 seconds, this equation tells
that, Jupiter needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km
(= Jupiter diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, the Earth moon needs
to rotate 13.1 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 142984 km (the
Earth moon circumference 10921 km) (The moon needs 27.3 days to rotate around
its axis and by that the 13.1 rotations needs 13.1 x 27.3 = 358 days = 1 year)
- 51118 km = 6.8 km/sec (Uranus velocity)x 7511 seconds, this equation tells that,
Uranus needs to move during 7511 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km
(=Uranus diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, Pluto needs to rotate
6.8 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 51118 km (Pluto
circumference 7511 km) (Pluto 153.3 hours to rotate around its axis and by that the
6.8 rotations needs 6.8 x 153.3 = 1042.5 hours)
- 51118 km = 4.7 km/sec (Pluto velocity) x 10921 seconds, this equation tells that,
Pluto needs to move during 10921 seconds to pass a distance =51118 km
(=Uranus diameter). But on the other side, the equation tells, the Earth moon needs
to rotate 4.7 times around its axis to pass by rotation a distance = 51118 km (The
moon needs 27.3 days to rotate around its axis and by that the 4.7 rotations needs
4.7 x 27.3 = 128.3 days).
- 142984 km = 4.7 km/sec (Pluto velocity) x 30589 seconds, this equation tells
that, Pluto needs to move during 30589 seconds to pass a distance =142984 km
(=Jupiter diameter). But on the other side 30589 days = Uranus orbital period.
Equation No. (1)
- The moon (rotation) to move (51118 km) needs 128.3 days BUT Pluto (rotation)
to move (51118 km) needs 1042.5 hours (=43.32 days) i.e. (128.3/43.3) = 3
Equation No. (2)
- The moon (rotation) to move (142984 km) needs 1year days BUT Pluto (rotation)
to move (142984 km) needs 30589 seconds (suppose days) (30589 /346.6) =88
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
- The 30589 seconds are used as 30589 solar days in Equation no. (2), let's left the
reason behind this using till the end of the discussion.
- What have we here?
- Mercury day period (175.9 days) = 3 x 58.66 days (Mercury rotation period),
where no. (3) is equation No. 1 result
- Mercury orbital period= 88 days (Equation no. 2 result)
Notice No. (1)
- 346.6 days (the nodal year) x 88 days (Mercury orbital period) = 30501 days and
- 30589 days (Uranus orbital period) = 30501 days + 88 days (accurately)
- This is astronomical cycles behaviors which proves that, Uranus orbital period
depends on (the nodal year and Mercury orbital period)
- How to prove that, this is astronomical behavior? Because we have seen it before
- 6939.75 days (Metonic Cycle period) =6585.3 days (Saros Cycle) +354.36 days
(Lunar synodic year), that means, the greater cycle is consisted by addition one
cycle to another smaller cycle – So Metonic is produced by addition of saros plus
one synodic year – here Also, Uranus orbital period is produced by addition the
value 30501 days (=346.6 x 88) to the value 88 days which is Mercury cycle
- Also we have seen that the cycle (2737 years) depends on smaller cycle (2736
years) where this last one (2736 years) depends on the moon metonic cycle (where
2736 = 144 x 19) and by that the cycle 2737 is produced by addition only 1 year.
- The Analysis Results
- We have 88 days (Mercury orbital period) and we have the rate (3) which is the
rate between Mercury day period and its rotation period – but we don't have any of
these 2 periods! How to create them
Equation No. (3)
- 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) = 2 x 778.6 mkm x 58.66 days
- 58.66 days = Mercury rotation period
- 778.6 mkm = (Jupiter Orbital Distance) (2 because the equation use the orbital
diameter which is 1557 mkm = 2 x 778.6 mkm).
- (Question No.1) Why Mercury rotation period is created based on Pluto orbital
period? Because Pluto orbital period is the solar system original period! How?
Equation No. (4)
- 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) = 1461 days x 2π3
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
- We know (1461 days = 365+365+365+366 days), but this period should be
considered as the basic period in the solar system because this value is produced
directly by a light motion as we may remember
o 86400 seconds x 0.3 mkm /sec (light known velocity) = 25920 mkm
o 17.75mkm (planets motions distances daily total) x 1461 days = 25920 mkm
So
o Light motion distance in 1 solar day = planets motions distances total during
1461 days – which makes this cycle (1461 days) as first cycle produced in
comparison with light motion – that makes it an original cycle period -
because of that the solar system depends on it to define Mercury rotation
period and based on the 2 equations (no. 1 and 2) mercury orbital period and
day period are produced.
- (Question No.2) Why does the equation (no.3) depends on Jupiter orbital diameter
1557.2 mkm to define Mercury cycles periods?
- Jupiter orbital circumference = Jupiter circumference x the moon circumference,
the previous different motions are done to pass distance (= Jupiter diameter) or a
distance (= Uranus diameter) –that shows – the previous motions have relationship
with the used terms in the equation.
- I want to say that, there's some geometrical machine here, this machine uses the
previous planets motions to define these data, so Jupiter orbital distance is defined
to be in consistency with Jupiter diameter which is defined to be in consistency
with the previous planets motions!!
- Who created this consistency – it's not the gravity force- it's a geometrical ability
which can create the matter, space, time and motions dimensions in such great
harmony- but why this harmony is necessary? Why if the moon motion to pass a
distance = Jupiter diameter was defined by another period of time, what would
happen in this case?
- My conclusion is the same one which is
A light beam traveled before the planet, and this light beam created the matter, space
and time dimensions to be in consistency then the planet is the slave follow its master
and perform its instructions.
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
References
The Moon Motion Trajectory Analysis (II)
https://www.academia.edu/44368860/The_Moon_Motion_Trajectory_Analysis_II_
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-motion-trajectory-analysis-ii
Light Motion Features Are Discovered in Planet Motion
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/light-motion-features-are-discovered-in-planet-motion
or
https://www.academia.edu/44286772/Light_Motion_Features_Are_Discovered_in_Planet_Motion
Can Different Rates Of Time Be Found In The Solar System Motion?(II)
https://www.academia.edu/44334645/Can_Different_Rates_Of_Time_Be_Found_In_The_Solar_System_Motion_II_
Does Particle Data Depend on Its Motion? (Lorentz Transformations Analysis)
https://vixra.org/abs/1912.0134
Dr. Budochkina, Svetlana Aleksandrovna
Associate professor - Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences (2005)
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/person22119
List of publications on Google Scholar
List of publications on ZentralBlatt
https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/MRAuthorID/757317
http://elibrary.ru/author_items.asp?spin=6087-3245
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-0425
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/G-7453-2014
http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=6507007003
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Svetlana_Budochkina
Full list of
publications:
http://web-local.rudn.ru/web-
local/prep/rj/index.php?id=2944&p=15209
Mr.Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-F-Tawdrous
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous