This document introduces arguments and critical thinking. It defines an argument as a set of propositions where one is the conclusion and the others are premises intended to support the conclusion. Arguments can be identified by finding the conclusion and premises. The conclusion of one argument can also serve as a premise for another argument. Critical thinking is important for citizens to properly evaluate moral, social, economic and political issues and have good reasons for what they believe.
Technical Communication; Definition and ClassificationShan Loveres
Technical Communication
Definition and Classification
You can add some hyperlink so the ppt become more presentable.
Disclaimer. Credits for the references I used for the examples.
Technical Communication; Definition and ClassificationShan Loveres
Technical Communication
Definition and Classification
You can add some hyperlink so the ppt become more presentable.
Disclaimer. Credits for the references I used for the examples.
What drives our results? Personally, professionally, entrepreneurially, financially? What’s behind it? Being in THE ZONE.
When you are in THE ZONE you experience…
Inner certainty
The ability to remain calm and peaceful amidst change and chaos
Your choices seem effortless and easier to commit to
You see more angles and perspectives
You’re more present in the moment and enjoy it more fully
You don’t wait to be engaged; you choose how you want to lean in, engage and play full out
Isn’t this the experience you’ve been looking for?
Learn more at www.E3.solutions
Dr Travis Bradbury’s: The 9 Worst Mistakes You Can Ever Make at Work
A version of this article first appeared at TalentSmart.com and was inspired by a piece authored by Mike Myatt.
www.E3.solutions
Providing effective training for club leaders is critical to creating a successful club. When club officers are well-trained to perform their duties, club members are better served. This makes the member experience more positive, which leads to a quality club experience and increased member retention. Without properly trained leaders at every level, districts and clubs cannot meet members' needs or introduce the benefits of Toastmasters to others. This presentation was created by District 1 to train club officers. Learn more at www.E3.solutions
The most influential leaders are unleashing their full power and potential by becoming more anabolic and less catabolic.
www.e3.solutions
Keys to Boosting Performance
How to Become a Better Leader
Employee engagement workshops
Employee engagement solutions
Energy Leadership workshops
According to Gallup's latest Employee Engagement Poll, 87% of the global workforce is disengaged. It's now more important than ever to inspire, motivate and engage your leadership team. To do that you'll want to use these proven employee engagement solutions. What follows is a presentation of ways managers, directors and senior executives alike can inspire, motivate and engage their employees.
Standard Form ArgumentsDiscussion TitleThe central tool of.docxwhitneyleman54422
Standard Form Arguments
Discussion Title
The central tool of logic is the argument. Accordingly, constructing good arguments is the central element of this course. Each writing assignment in this course will give you an opportunity to construct and improve upon an argument that you will develop as the course progresses. This discussion post allows you to begin the process of developing your argument by presenting good reasoning on both sides of an issue.
The requirement for this discussion is a minimum of four posts on four separate days, including at least two substantive responses to peers. The total combined word count for all of your posts for this discussion, counted together, should be at least 400 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt, and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly. In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by responding substantively to the replies that others make to you as well. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can.
Prepare: To prepare for this discussion, make sure to read the assigned chapters of the primary text and to review the required resources, including the videos about arguments (in the “Lectures” link on the left). Before responding to the prompt, make sure as well to participate in the interactive scenario at the top of this page titledThe Raise to gain more appreciation of the importance of constructing good arguments in life.
Reflect: Choose a topic from thePHI103 Final Paper Options list. It should be a topic that you find interesting, but also for which you will be able defend a position with careful logical reasoning. Construct the strongest argument that you can on each side of the issue. Strengthen your arguments by contemplating possible objections to each argument, and revise your arguments in light of the objections. Continue this process until you feel that your arguments for each side are as convincing as you can possibly make them.
Write: Present your two arguments (one on each side of the issue) in standard form (with each premise and conclusion on a separate line) on the topic you selected from thePHI103 Final Paper Options list. The two arguments should defend different positions on the topic. For example, if your topic was the existence of Santa Claus, then you would present one argument for the claim that Santa Claus does exist and another argument that Santa Claus does not exist. The premises of each argument will present reasons for thinking that the conclusion is true.
Here is an example of what an argument in standard form looks like:
Premise 1: If Santa Claus exists, then he lives at the North Pole.
Prem.
Critical Thinking 63In general, it is fairly rare that som.docxmydrynan
Critical Thinking 63
In general, it is fairly rare that someone will become confused as to whether a
particular passage is an argument or an explanation. Most people are fairly good
at recognizing when an attempt to persuade is being made. The fundamental
question to ask is whether the force of the language is to convince one to accept
a particular position or to explain why something that is already accepted is the
case.
The principle of charity
A further word on interpretation involves what philosophers call the principle
of charity, according to which one is in some sense obligated to offer the strong-
est possible interpretation of an opposing argument. This may seem somewhat
counterintuitive. Why, after all, should one try to make an opponent’s position
stronger? There are several compelling reasons for doing just that. The first of
these is simply to save time. Suppose that an opponent offers an objection to a
weak interpretation of an argument. In response to such an objection, a defender
of the position can simply reformulate the argument in a stronger way. If, how-
ever, an opponent interprets the argument in the strongest possible form from
the outset, such an option is not available to the defender, who must then offer a
more substantive defence of the position. A second reason to do this is to reduce
the chances of committing a straw man fallacy (see 4.2).
The best reason for operating under a principle of charity, however, is to
maximize the force of an objection. Consider how in competitive sports a vic-
tory can be soured by the fact that the defeated team had some of their best play-
ers out of the match with injuries. It can always be said that the winning team
won only because the defeated team was playing at a disadvantage. The ideal
scenario is to defeat opponents when they are at their strongest. In a similar way,
if an opponent interprets the argument in the best possible light (perhaps in an
even stronger form than the proponent originally stated it!) and grants as many
of the premises as possible, a devastating objection is all the more damaging.
5.2 Evaluating Complex Arguments
In the real world, arguments are often embedded in speeches or essays that may
or may not be clearly worded. Crucial premises or even the conclusion may be
Co
py
ri
gh
t
@
20
07
.
Hu
ma
ni
ti
es
-E
bo
ok
s.
Al
l
ri
gh
ts
r
es
er
ve
d.
M
ay
n
ot
b
e
re
pr
od
uc
ed
i
n
an
y
fo
rm
w
it
ho
ut
p
er
mi
ss
io
n
fr
om
t
he
p
ub
li
sh
er
,
ex
ce
pt
f
ai
r
us
es
p
er
mi
tt
ed
u
nd
er
U
.S
.
or
a
pp
li
ca
bl
e
co
py
ri
gh
t
la
w.
EBSCO : eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 10/12/2018 8:18 PM via FAYETTEVILLE TECH COMM CLG
AN: 373337 ; Crews-Anderson, Timothy A..; Critical Thinking and Informal Logic
Account: s5824366.main.eds
Critical Thinking 64
tacitly implied and never explicitly stated. An argument that contains one or
more unstated propositions is called an enthymeme, and.
2. Every day we are bombarded with messages
apparently telling us what to do or not to do,
what to believe or not to believe and many
more.
When we ask the question ‘why?’ we’re asking
for a reason for doing what we are being
enjoined to do, or for believing what we are
being enjoined to believe.
3. You may find it surprising to think of an
‘argument’ as a term for giving someone a
reason to do or believe something.
Example: You and your friends or family give
each other reasons for believing something or
doing something all the time – why we should
expect our friend to be late for dinner, why we
should walk rather than wait for the bus, and
so on.
4. It is a good reflection of the importance of the
skills you are developing that those in power
sometimes fear the effects of those who can
think critically about moral, social, economic
and political issues. The ability to think critically,
then, is essential if one is to function
properly in one’s role as a citizen. It is not for
nothing that Socrates, the most famous of
critical thinkers, was sometimes referred to as
‘the Gadfly’.
5. BEGINNING TO THINK CRITICALLY:
RECOGNISING ARGUMENTS
We do many things with language – state a
fact, ask a question, tell someone to do
something, insult someone, praise someone,
promise to do something, swear an oath,
make a threat, tell a story, recite a poem, sing
a song, say a character’s lines in a play, cheer
on a football team.
6. Rhetoric
; Any verbal or written attempt to persuade
someone to believe, desire or do something
that does not attempt to give good reasons for
the belief, desire or action, but attempts to
motivate that belief, desire or action solely
through the power of the words used.
7. To say that a claim is true is to say that what
is claimed is how things actually are.
An argument
A set of propositions of which one is a
conclusion and the remainder are premises,
intended as support for the conclusion.
8. what exactly do we mean by a
proposition?
A proposition
The factual content expressed by a declarative sentence on a
particular occasion.
The same proposition may be expressed by different
sentences. For example, on a given occasion, ‘The
Government has decided to hold a public enquiry into the
affair’ would express the same proposition as ‘It was decided
that the Government would hold a public enquiry into the
affair’.
9. ASPECTS OF MEANING
• Rhetorical force
This is the rhetorical aspect of a
sentence’smeaning. It is not part of the
propositional content that it expresses; rather,
it is the emotive or otherwise suggestive
window-dressing surrounding the proposition,
which may be used to persuade us.
10. • Implicature
Implicature is meaning, which is not stated,
but which one can reasonably take to be
intended, given the context in which the
sentence is written or uttered (it is known
more generally in linguistics as conversational
implicature).
11. • Definitions
Definitions tell us what it takes for something
to qualify as a particular type of thing. The
kind of definition with which you are most
familiar is probably a dictionary definition.
12. In reconstructing arguments you should follow
the example below by taking these steps:
• Identify the conclusion.
• Identify the premises.
• Number the premises and write them out in
order.
• Draw in the inference bar.
• Write out the conclusion, placing ‘C)’ in front of it.
13. IDENTIFYING CONCLUSIONS AND
PREMISES
• IDENTIFYING CONCLUSIONS
Once you have determined that a text or speech
contains an attempt to persuade by argument, it
is easiest to proceed by identifying its conclusion.
• INTERMEDIATE CONCLUSIONS
The conclusion of one argument may serve as a
premise of a subsequent argument. The
conclusion of that argument may itself serve as a
premise for another argument and so on.
14. • STANDARD FORM
An argument may be about any subject and
have any number of premises, but it will
always have only one final conclusion.
15. • CHAPTER SUMMARY
Critical thinking enables us to ensure that we
have good reasons to believe or do that which
people attempt to persuade us to do or to
believe. Attempts to persuade may be
argumentative or non-argumentative.